Album Review – Jason Isbell’s “Foxes in the Snow”

#570 (Americana) on the Country DDS.
Writing and recording divorce records in the era of non-disclosure agreements has to make for a difficult task. But if there’s any wordsmith out there in the world capable of navigating those hurdles, it’s probably Jason Isbell.
Wanting to capture the immediacy of the moments and the sentiments when they’re fresh, Isbell chose to not take the time to coordinate schedules with his backing band The 400 Unit and fuss with mic’ing drums (which really is a pill). Instead he decided instead to go acoustic. Foxes in the Snow is what it’s called, and it finds Isbell writing for the first time in a while without Amanda Shires second-guessing everything and cursing Dave Cobb under her breath.
The fair question to ask with any acoustic album is if the material is done justice in the stripped-down setting, or if it would be better presented with a full band. Jason Isbell is a more than capable guitar player. In fact, it’s one of his most underrated attributes. And without the aid of overdubs, accompaniment, or even shakers, he sets out to encapsulate the last 18 months or so of his life with mostly favorable results.
Whenever an album like this hits shelves, it’s usually accompanied by some exclusive spread in the press that helps unlock a lot of the meaning. In this case, it was behind the paywall of The Wall Street Journal. Thanks to the folks over at MSN, there’s an alternative version too. It’s there where Isbell reveals that former 400 Unit bass player Jimbo Hart was fired as opposed to choosing to walk away. He also says the Shires divorce was not instigated by either cheating. It was Amanda’s growing resentment as Isbell’s career success that was partly to blame, at least according to Isbell.

Yes I know, these a saucy details. But this is a divorce record, and I’m not the one printing them. Then it gets even saucier when it’s revealed Isbell’s new flame is 29 year old visual artist Anna Weyant, who caused quite a stir in the art world after dating the 79-year-old art tycoon Larry Gagosian (net worth $600 million)—a relationship that is given credit by some for taking Weyant’s paintings from hundreds of dollars in value, to over a million.
What does any of this have to do with the songs of Foxes in the Snow? Actually, quite a bit. Amanda Shires, Isbell’s divorce, and Anna Weyant make up the majority of the inspiration for the songs, some of which feel perfect in the acoustic setting, and some that beg for a more fleshed-out treatment.
To be fair to each track, we’ll address them individually (see below). But overall, the album is entertaining, involved despite the acoustic nature, enriching with the stories and the poetry Isbell weaves into the tracks, though fair to wonder what it would sounds like in the full band setting. Perhaps someday we will find out.
Isbell is definitely one of the few who can take an acoustic song quite far. But it’s also fair to recognize Foxes in the Snow for what it is—a transitional album between eras for Isbell to express things in inside him that is more personal to himself than appealing to a wide audience, while still illustrating his world class-caliber writing.
8/10
– – – – – – – –
Purchase from Jason Isbell
Purchase from Amazon
Song Reviews:
1. Bury Me
Though we think of Jason Isbell through the always nebulous lens of “Americana,” he’s treated us to numerous country songs throughout his career. “Bury Me” might be his first Western one—not especially groundbreaking, but well-provisioned and entertaining nonetheless. One of the good things about an acoustic-only song is it’s like a mound of clay. You can definitely hear some country and Western bands molding this into a cool cut. Compared to the rest of the album, “Bury Me” is a comparatively lighthearted moment to start the album.
2. Ride To Robert’s
If you’re a true country music fan, you should know about the mythology surrounding Robert’s Western World on Lower Broadway in Nashville, which is the entertainment corridor’s last true honky tonk, and where traditional country lives. Isbell does a more than admiral job weaving this reverence into what is actually a love song, but one that works as a Robert’s tribute too, and even makes sure to name drop Don Kelley, who famously commanded audiences from the Robert’s stage for many years.
“Ride To Robert’s” is a great bout of songwriting that illustrates how weaving the elements of place and geography can take a good song to great places. He does this a few times on Foxes in the Snow. The line “easel in the empty room” is a reference to his new girlfriend and artist Anna Weyant.
3. Eileen
This might be the hardest song to pin down the story or inspiration behind. It’s definitely about navigating through a romantic relationship, but might be about a past love, or a current one, or one in-between. Similar to the next song (“Gravelweed”), it includes a melody that sounds strongly indicative of a Jason Isbell song, and one you could hear expanded upon by The 400 Unit.
4. Gravelweed
This is clearly a song about the unraveling of his relationship with Amanda Shires. The line “I was a gravelweed and I needed you to raise me. And you couldn’t reach me once I felt like I was raised,” alludes to how Sires helped Isbell through sobriety, but they couldn’t hack it after he’d matured past that part of his life. “I’m sorry the love songs all mean different things today” is perhaps the most poignant line of the album.
The line before says, “And now that I live to see my melodies betray me…” and “Gravelweed” includes a classic and characteristic Jason Isbell melody. It’s an undeniably great song, but perhaps the strongest of the set that you could hear backed by The 400 Unit, and probably would be even better with them.
5. Don’t Be Tough
One of the simpler compositions of the set, it captures Isbell running through aphorisms. It really works to highlight the dichotomy of the Jason Isbell persona, where he can be so caring and charismatic with a guitar. But when punching away with his thumbs on the phone, he can completely lose sight of the humanity, and become a horrible spokesperson for his beliefs as he punches down and insults strangers.
Jason Isbell should listen to himself. When he’s not right of mind, it isn’t just the bottle he should leave be. Social media and it’s dopamine high is an addictive and self-destructive substance too.
6. Open and Close
Jason Isbell has revealed that he’s living part-time in New York, and this song makes numerous references to his life in the city. It also makes specific references to his girlfriend Anna Weyant who was raised in Calgary, with Jason’s self-coaching to “be brave” probably referencing the moment he made his first romantic move. This song feels more personal to Isbell, with the specificity probably hindering it from heavily resonating with the audience. But it’s well-composed nonetheless.
7. Foxes in the Snow
It’s fair to question if this song works, and even more fair to question why it was released as one of the album’s lead singles. Sure, the mood and composition is supposed to come across as a little unhinged to express the uneasiness of a love unraveling. But lines like “I love her mouth” should probably never make it into a song. The line, “I love the carrot but I really like the stick” seems to say a lot, but whatever message the song is meant to convey, Isbell is careful to leave the underlying truths somewhat veiled.
8. Crimson and Clay
This is a song referencing Isbell’s upbringing and ties to Alabama, though some of the specific details and references are probably fictionalized. The song is complimented by an interesting chord selection that with The 400 Unit could result in a gritty, rocking moment. But unlike some of the other songs of Foxes in the Snow, Isbell is able to make “Crimson and Clay” feel more full-bodied by himself.
The reference to a bolt action gun and leaving it behind is about all that passes for a “political” moment on the album, and it’s a soft, passing one at that. Nonetheless, you can expect politics to be the primary barrier for many to this album, which is unfortunate.
9. Good While It Lasted
This could be about Isbell’s new love Anna Weyant, or perhaps someone in-between Weyant and Shires that didn’t last. “The last time I tried this sober I was 17,” is the key line, finding Isbell trying to figure out courtship as a man in his mid 40s. But similar to other songs on the album, this song speaks more to Isbell’s personal experiences as opposed to touching on more universal themes. This album is Isbell processing through stuff, so this shouldn’t be taken as a sin.
10. True Believer
If you’re looking for the one song about the Jason Isbell divorce from Amanda Shires, this is it. Where Isbell forgoes specificity on the divorce for most of the album, he works in some concrete details here. But he also knows when to pull back and let the audience’s imagination fill in blanks, and leave other things cloudy as to not be trite and obvious. There’s is also probably legal boundaries, which like a shock jock, means some things must be left as innuendo. Either way, Isbell pours his emotion out in the song, though this is probably a good moment to point out that there are two sides to every story.
11. Wind Behind The Rain
On an album full of messy sentiments tied to developing and unraveling relationships, “Wind Behind The Rain” is uncharacteristically devotional, and perhaps, hopeful. It also includes some of Isbell’s most intricate playing on the album, following the melody mostly through individual notes as opposed to open chords with embellishments. It helps end a rather stormy album on a somewhat positive note.
March 10, 2025 @ 8:52 am
He list me with his woke bullshat. Won’t be spending another time on this clown.
March 10, 2025 @ 8:56 am
This comment is so inadvertently perfect.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:04 am
List, lost…. go by what I mean Hoss.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:25 am
Don’t know if you heard, but English is our official language, now. Please try to speak/write it if you wish to be in this country.
March 16, 2025 @ 10:47 am
I’m a long time fan..and this album is too personal…and lacks the musicality of his other works..I bought it as I do all his work, but meh
March 10, 2025 @ 11:43 am
Yep. Same.
March 10, 2025 @ 2:07 pm
An artist with compassion for others. The horror!!!
March 11, 2025 @ 11:00 am
I saw JI 2X last year. Met him when he was a drunk in DBTs. I appreciate his music bigly. But its his arrogant, lecturing jackassery that turns people off not his ‘compassion for others’. Confront the truth once in a while – it promotes personal growth.
March 11, 2025 @ 11:56 am
Bullshit, and you know it. Funny how you feel justified calling Isbell names but when he calls an asshole an asshole, you have a problem with it.
March 11, 2025 @ 1:03 pm
No surprise ID supports holier-than-thou poser Isbell.
March 13, 2025 @ 7:03 am
He never use to call anybody names when he was drawing 700 people a show. Once he made his bank, he turns into a libiot shitshow. Songs of white guilt, popping off at certain hats…. fuck him. Not another dime or the effort to go see his show.
March 13, 2025 @ 5:27 pm
Awww….Is Mikey butthurt over being told certain truths?
March 10, 2025 @ 4:48 pm
Silas House keeps him on a short leash.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:06 am
Love how he took the high road….
“It got to the point where, if something really good happened to me, I wouldn’t even mention it, because I knew it would hurt her,”
He wouldn’t tell her about his achievements in the moment but then let’s that quote out.
Great musician, clown man
March 10, 2025 @ 9:16 am
He’s got a Dumble amp and she doesn’t…so she can suck it.
March 10, 2025 @ 4:51 pm
He paid over half a million for “red eye.”
March 11, 2025 @ 7:31 am
Honestly I don’t see any issue with that. Joe Bonamassa doesn’t need yet another classic Gibson or Dumble Amp while us plebians scrap away at the bottom on our mexican strats.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:16 am
I mean…he wasn’t talking about good stuff happening in the moment, because doing so would have hurt his wife.
He doesn’t have the same duty of care to his ex-wife.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:18 am
Maybe so, but “mother of my child” means there’s still some duty of care!
May God have mercy on his soul now that this is all out there. Hell hath no fury!
March 10, 2025 @ 9:27 am
Oh, for sure!
But compared to what they put out for public consumption in Running With Our Eyes Closed…that line’s pretty damn tame, ahaha
March 10, 2025 @ 9:30 am
I keep forgetting to watch that, thanks for reminder!
March 16, 2025 @ 10:48 am
I’m a long time fan..and this album is too personal…and lacks the musicality of his other works..I bought it as I do all his work, but meh
March 10, 2025 @ 10:03 am
If the basis for enjoying music is how you view an artists politics and/or their quality as relationship partners you ain’t going to be enjoying a lot of music…
March 10, 2025 @ 12:22 pm
I’ll be the judge of that, thank you very much
March 10, 2025 @ 2:45 pm
If you can point out what I said that isn’t factual, have at it.
The history of Country music is littered with legends who had many unsavory aspects to their personalities.
If Isbell’s biggest crime is he is an “insufferable liberal” and “bad husband”, that makes him a borderline saint compared to some of the other Country/Southern Rock/Americana artists throughout history.
March 10, 2025 @ 3:02 pm
I was just joking. I listen to Isbell and will
Continue to do so, but throwing his ex-wife under the bus like that was, to me, worthy of derision in this comment section.
March 13, 2025 @ 8:54 am
Insufferable liberal is more dangerous to this country than a druggie musician.
March 11, 2025 @ 9:24 am
Id say that is normally true unless the artist has no qualms about passing that judgement on to others, very openly.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:06 am
I’m a big fan since Southeastern. The sound of this record drew me in immediately, it’s very enjoyable to listen to the acoustic guitar and folk/country songwriting. I’m not sure lyrically it will hold my attention for months like most of his records do, as it just seems so personal that it’s hard to relate to. But I’m enjoying it for now.
Gravelweed and Good While It Lasted are standouts for me.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:09 am
Honestly question:
Is Gravelweed his best song since Vampires…or since Cover Me Up?
It’s the indelible way he has of stabbing your heart in the balls with a melody that you roar along to.
(Caught the “Evening With” tour in Dublin…and the songs from this album were incredible acoustic – Can’t wait to see what they’ll look like with the full crew.)
March 10, 2025 @ 9:27 am
It’s definitely a continuation of the “Cover Me Up” narrative, and probably has the strongest melody of the album, and probably the strongest writing. Isbell is sort of known for struggling with his melodies a little bit despite his gifts as a songwriter. “Gravelweed” and “Eileen” are the two songs with the strongest melodies, and the two songs my brain most wanted to hear with a full band behind them, which we very well might in the future.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:14 am
I’ll listen to the album soon. I just don’t feel any sympathy for Isbell and Shire’s divorce strife.
March 12, 2025 @ 1:15 pm
Agreed. As a Sacrament, marriage is essentially an altar upon which both individuals need to make personal sacrifices for the betterment of the union. In the moment, those sacrifices are tough, but it all makes sense as the marriage blossoms. This is not meant to criticize the two of them–many marriages these days don’t have the guidance needed to understand this reality. It’s a shame and they unfortunately have become a public example of it, just like many marriages and eventual divorces between 2 musicians over the years. Hopefully they’re both finding ways to heal and move forward.
I’m excited for a more stripped back album from Isbell and look forward to the opportunity to give it a listen.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:21 am
I liked this album and thought this was a good review. 8/10 for me which yeah for Isbell is kind of on the low side. But also probably room to grow on me. Not the obvious masterpiece southeastern and weathervanes were at first blush. But might grow on me the way something more than free has which is now up there with his best for me.
I will say there’s just nothing controversial in the album or anything to offend people who dislike Isbell because of politics. So any comments to that effect will be funny.
But yeah good album. Maybe a minor note in his catalogue but that’s okay he sets very high standards.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:24 am
Let me guess, you love the album because Isbell is a liberal douchebag
March 10, 2025 @ 9:31 am
That’s exactly why I love this album. We love to meet up and rub our taints together while talking about preferred pronouns.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:44 am
I believe the term is called “Scissorhim”
March 10, 2025 @ 4:16 pm
Thanks for the laugh! It was a good one-
March 10, 2025 @ 9:40 am
Let me guess: you think Muskrat is going to send you a $5,000 check.
March 13, 2025 @ 8:54 am
Musk is an American hero for cutting waste.
Be better.
March 13, 2025 @ 10:30 am
Lol Be better he says. Continuing to worship the orange turd and President Musk and he says be better.
March 13, 2025 @ 5:29 pm
So, tell me CK, if he’s found as much fraud as he claims…where are the arrests? Where are the perp walks of the people committing this fraud?
Oh, wait…that’s right….it’s all smoke and mirrors. You got conned and you still refuse to admit it.
March 13, 2025 @ 7:01 pm
None of these comments are on the topic at hand. Move on.
March 11, 2025 @ 4:43 am
If you read this website and conclude that Trigger is a liberal, you have some serious comprehension problems.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:25 am
Jason’s, Wind Behind The Rain.
Full on Bro country.
He’ll be wailing Cover Me Up, when his gold digger leaves him.
And, still be left with his Bro country composition.
March 10, 2025 @ 1:56 pm
She’s almost certainly wealthier than him but yeah.
March 11, 2025 @ 11:12 am
Ah Di, there you are, I was hoping to bump into you! Just wondering if Ingrid Andress still a hater of America now that she’s sung a decent version of the anthem?!
March 11, 2025 @ 3:35 pm
Have no idea.
Haven’t listened, so, taking your word that she sung a decent version of the anthem.
Happy for her.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:27 am
By the way the greatest divorce record of all time is “ALONE” BY Vern Gosdin. but you didn’t mention that one im sure
March 10, 2025 @ 9:47 am
I think the best divorce record is Blood on the tracks.
March 10, 2025 @ 1:31 pm
Marvin Gaye’s “Here, My Dear” is up there, too
March 10, 2025 @ 7:22 pm
I’ll take “She Got the Gold Mine, I Got the Shaft” over this self-important carp. I don’t give a frak about Jason Isbell’s divorce. At least Jerry Reed made it fun and moved on.
March 11, 2025 @ 8:35 am
My favorite Dylan album.
I think Tunnel of Love is a great divorce album too. Covers the whole relationship range from wanting someone (Ain’t Got You) to marriage (Walk Like a Man, Tunnel of Love) to trouble (Brilliant Disguise) to division (One Step Up) to final separation (When You’re Alone).
March 11, 2025 @ 9:59 pm
Greatest divorce record is Phases And Stages imo
March 10, 2025 @ 9:54 am
I find it a bit annoying that some can never separate the music from the artists’ Political or social beliefs and commentaries. Being from the UK this is something I often have to do with a lot of US artists, otherwise I’d be very limited with the music that I can enjoy. What’s the point of being distracted when you can just get lost in the music. Often when Isbell is mentioned or spoken about some people seem distracted away from the music (mostly in the comments sections).
Trigger, I like your review, this album is growing on me, personally I think Isbell is at his best when the music is stripped back. This album reminds me of my favorite release of his Something More Than Free. I was gutted I couldn’t see him perform live on his recent UK Tour but hopefully one day I’ll get chance. The only thing I’m not keen on here is the number of times you mention how these songs would sound with his band. I think we should just appreciate them as they are presented here. Not everything needs to me loud and rocked up with the 400 Unit IMO.
March 10, 2025 @ 10:13 am
A lot of people can’t differentiate between “Woke” and “Liberal.” Isbell has a history of being openly a jerk to people who hold conservative beliefs and going as far to state how he doesn’t want them at his shows. That’s why I will never fully defend him against this backlash. IDK how much true woke ideology Isbell believes because I am not on Twitter (X). But he is obnoxious and self-righteous.
I do get annoyed when people discount Bruce Springsteen, Tim Mcgraw, Garth Brooks over their political beliefs because none of them have been asshats about it.
March 10, 2025 @ 11:11 am
I mean the difference between woke and liberal is just whatever thing you made up so it’s hard to understand what point you’re making here. Woke is just you are confrontational about liberal beliefs instead of keeping it low key to avoid messing up the money like Tim McGraw?
Woke, PC, whatever boogeyman term Elon musk comes up with next just means liberal. Now liberal and left wing those are very different things. Isbell is just a liberal who actually writes a lot of songs about politics unlike Tim McGraw or Garth brooks.
Also Bruce Springsteen is funny up there considering he’s a guy famous for stopping concerns to give political lectures something I haven’t seen Isbell do in the several times I’ve seen him.
March 10, 2025 @ 11:42 am
I’ve never seen Springsteen in concert, maybe he has given political lectures but I was not aware of that. I have seen Isbell in concert in the Trump era and he didn’t say anything political in concert.
The correct understanding of “Woke” is a fixation on identity politics. (race, gender, sex, Elon-derangement syndrome, etc)
March 10, 2025 @ 1:58 pm
My issue with Elon is he’s not an American but in American government. I’m old school like that.
March 10, 2025 @ 2:04 pm
You are against African-Americans holding an advisory position to Government officials?
March 10, 2025 @ 2:57 pm
We’re off topic folks! This is an article about Jason Isbell’s new album. Please keep comments relevant to that.
March 10, 2025 @ 11:54 am
Again, maybe it’s because I’m from the UK and, for various reasons, I’ve been trying to distance myself from Politics; but I still don’t know why, particularly US country/Americana fans, still find it so difficult to separate an artists music from anything else. In the 21st century is it not possible to like music by artists of a different political leaning, after-all there’s been many politically ouspoken musicians over the years.
I guess though, to a degree, I can see yours and others viewpoints about how difficult it can be, as I, and some other UK music friends recently felt disappointed seeing certain political rants by India Ramey. I believe it was along the lines of her saying if people didn’t agree with her Political views then they should immediately unfollow her. I hadn’t long started enjoying her music but then seeing this non music drivel she posted left me feeling conflicted.
A lot of music I listen to I have no idea what the artists Politcal stances are (and I’m not particularly bothered either). If I like the music, unless the artist has commited a major crime, I’m not going to unlike the music that I enjoy due to Political beliefs or social media posts.
There’s many artists who shove their other interests and viewpoints in people’s faces especially via their music pages. I don’t particularly like artists using their music pages to talk about their other interests like hunting, but that’s me not fully understanding that US culture and way of life. I do wish they’d share that stuff elsewhere but when it comes to the music, I do try hard to park it to one side, as I’d hate for these things to ruin my musical enjoyment.
March 10, 2025 @ 12:34 pm
Most of it is caused by outrage stirred up on social media. Many low-information followers find it contagious. 6 months ago ever other post on my timeline was bad satire of Kid Rock going on tour for an “Anti-Woke” concert or some other made-up BS story that a bunch of dunderheads over the age of 45 just believed without a second thought.
And this is on both sides. A bunch of people turned on Eric Clapton and Van Morrison for speaking out against covid vaccines. Anytime I click on a post of Eric Clapton there are a bunch of people hating on him.
Honestly I think most of it is a big psyop driven by fake accounts that have weaponized many of the mental fucktards in this social war of division. I’m not sure how to be nice about it.
I think for the majority of people political viewpoints are a non-factor in music. I just don’t follow many artists on social media.
In the UK it’s probably smart to distance yourself from politics because you’ll get a knock on your door by the police if you speak out against the wrong thing online, or share the wrong meme. At least in the US we can be stupid and free.
March 10, 2025 @ 1:32 pm
I agree. Social media, especially Twitter, has been the cause of so much division. Clapton says some stupid shot as does Van. Love them both as far as music.
Jason Isbell may indeed be an a-hole bit damn if he doesn’t make great records. It’s easy for an old guy to say but get away from the social media. No good comes from it.
Now go play a record!
March 10, 2025 @ 2:06 pm
Clapton and Van Morrision didn’t say anything stupid!
The only thing Clapton said that was stupid (which he apologized for) was in the late 70’s when he made some racist comments in the deepest part of his heroine addiction.
March 11, 2025 @ 3:25 am
Eric Clapton’s been saying openly racist shit for decades – he was backing Powell in 2004, as well.
He also supports freaking fox hunting
Also, his music fucking rocks, so I listen to it.
March 10, 2025 @ 1:11 pm
When it comes to Jason Isbell and his politics, he truly is an exceptional case, because he’s political-based shaming and bashing is so high-profile, and has been for many years. He once called me an “incel” and a “coward” because I had the audacity to assert that telling his own fans to stop listening to him if they didn’t agree with his politics was counter-productive to his cause.
But even though he’s attacked me personally, I still enjoy his music, and remain a strong advocate for people to put his caustic political behavior aside and listen to the music. But Isbell makes that extremely difficult not just because he shares his political views, but because he so clearly looks down on people who don’t share his.
March 10, 2025 @ 1:27 pm
Thanks Trigger, I’d probably find it a little difficult to enjoy the music as much if I was personally attacked. Well done for continuing to enjoy the music and advocating others to do the same.
It’s very strange and alien to me (and I’m sure others) how an artist can turn on their own fans and attack them for not sharing their other non music views. Surely they can’t be so oblivious to think all those who listen, stream, purchase the music or attend their concerts share all their other beliefs. I wish as a minimum artists at least tried harder to keep the music separate from the other rubbish.
March 10, 2025 @ 1:39 pm
That’s how you know he has a cause worth championing since his first response to disagreement is to name-call
March 11, 2025 @ 8:20 am
I mean…it tracks that Isbell would have very little time for someone so afraid of upsetting his fanbase that his moderation follows an “Embrace Debate” approach to topics like “Are gay people destroying Western Society?” and “Is miscegenation causing the degeneration of the white race?”
It certainly wasn’t nice of him to call you an incel, though.
March 12, 2025 @ 3:01 am
You remind people that have gone political on this thread that its about a review of jason isbells new album then decide to commwnt on Jasons politics which is a bit contradictory. If you dont want discussions on politics its best to steer clear of it in the first place. On this reord he hasnt written a song proclaining that donald trump is an asshole mores the pity we could do with one of those right now. I mean we are told jasons an asshole bit someone voted an even bigger one in as president and the idiots have done it twice too . He was crap the first tine round
March 15, 2025 @ 12:15 am
The fact that he has so fervently demanded that people with political beliefs similar to my own stop listening to him and going to his shows is part of what makes me keep listening and going to his shows. One, I love most of the music, and two, I know the very fact that I am in his audience would piss him off. So it’s a win-win for me.
March 15, 2025 @ 10:12 am
Well, he was a mean abusive drunk, and like all such people, he remains so sober. The fundamentals don’t change. I don’t think it goes any deeper than that. If he wasn’t such an ass (as he always has been), people wouldn’t mind so much if he disagreed with him politically.
March 10, 2025 @ 7:34 pm
A lot of this is Jason’s fault. He invites it upon himself by being outspoken and quite frankly, an asshole, when given the opportunity in public. I’m a huge Isbell fan, have been since his Truckers days, but it’s not an unreasonable take that Jason is a hard dude to live with. That bleeds over into how people perceive his music.
March 11, 2025 @ 6:44 pm
Yep.
Isbell’s a cantankerous dick.
…and if someone whose *moderated* comments section tends to boil down to topics like “Was it the women, the gays, the Jews, or miscegenation that destroyed OUR CULTURE” tries to virtue signal on how he needs to stop alienating fans…there’s no world in which that ends well.
Kyle would definitely tell the Dead Kennedys that they needed to embrace ALL punk fans, circa 2001.
March 11, 2025 @ 7:45 pm
“Nazi Punks Fuck Off” came out in 1981, and as soon as I was old enough to hear it, I was shouting along.
If you think the way to change the world and build consensus behind ideas is to tell ANYONE who might disagree with you in any subtle way to “fuck off!” like Isbell does, you’re doomed to the same outcome of 2024 over and over. Or, if you actually want to change the world, you bend your shoulder to the world of changing minds one at a time.
People do gets told “Fuck Off!” here all the time. You just never see them. But I will never tell that to any soul that I hope can still be reached.
March 12, 2025 @ 2:58 pm
Good shout on the date – my bad.
I resolutely don’t think telling people to fuck off is how we change the world – I actively push against that approach in the political spaces I frequent.
…but I also don’t expect angry alcoholics to shoulder the emotional and mental burden of educating these folks, any more than I expect my Jewish friends to try explaining the difference between a kibbutz and a settlement to dumbass Zoomer “allies.”
I respect that Isbell uses his “Fuck You Money” to say “Fuck You,” rather than trying to shepherd folks who love “TVA” and want the government to keep its goddamn hands off their Medicare…because, much as I enjoyed this Divorce Record, I’m not particularly interested in a Relapse Record.
March 20, 2025 @ 3:05 am
From what I’ve seen, those comments about not wanting people at his shows are normally in response to someone responding to a Tweet or whatever saying “you’ve lost me as a fan” after he’s posted something vaguely political.
March 20, 2025 @ 3:02 am
Fellow UK listener and yeah, it’s tricky. I generally avoid going on too much of a deep dive on anyone I listen to, especially with country music, so unless they are very vocal, then I tend not to know about their politics.
Isbell is pretty vocal, and while I’m certainly left-leaning, I’ve found some of his social media posts a little cringy and certain tracks a little heavy-handed.
I also missed the solo tour, but did catch him and the 400 Unit at Bristol last November.
March 10, 2025 @ 10:00 am
I am no Mandy Shires fan but some of these lyrics just seem unnecessarily cruel.
March 10, 2025 @ 10:23 am
Normally I would agree, but she fired first when she was changing song lyrics during shows to make fun of his teeth right after they split up.
March 10, 2025 @ 11:43 am
I don’t think any of this approaches idiot wind. Or the fleetwood Mac songs where the people getting divorced are both singing on the album and the person they’re singing about cheating on them is cheating on them with other people in the band. Artists make art about their lives. Sometimes that’s messy. It’s part of what art is.
March 14, 2025 @ 12:47 pm
Fleetwood Mac was LITERALLY a clusterfuck in those days. Do you think they could’ve done it sober?
March 10, 2025 @ 10:37 am
A fair amount of commentary drifted pretty far away from the music, but the review was fair – even if I disagreed with the score.
This one was a really pleasant surprise, since I found the singles “Bury Me” and the title track to be two of the weakest on the album.
A single mic, a ($10K Martin) guitar, and man bleeding all over both. It’s music at its best when it’s done correctly, and an absolutel snooze fest otherwise. Think anyone who follows him will find this to be one of the most gripping albums of the year.
I just hope we don’t start taking this level of output for granted because it’s what we’ve come to expect from every release.
March 10, 2025 @ 11:52 am
I definitely recognize that large portions of this review dealt with personal matters and Jason Isbell’s relationships. But that is what this album is about, and it feels unavoidable, especially when describing the themes of the songs. I feel it would be irresponsible to act ignorant of the circumstances these songs were inspired by, especially with the specificity Isbell brings to some of them.
Whenever reviewing acoustic albums or songs, I think it’s only fair to ask if this is the best context to present the song, especially when it’s someone like Isbell with the resources to have other options. On this album, I think most of the songs are fine acoustically, but others that is fair to question. I think about the recent album from Charles Wesley Godwin that was mostly acoustic, but really put the extra effort out to make sure each song was still given it’s proper due in the studio space. I definitely agree that Isbell did a great job with the limitations he put on himself, and core fans will find this album killer. But I tried to be fair with this album and consider how it will be regarded among the greater population.
This was not an easy album to review.
March 10, 2025 @ 12:39 pm
That all makes sense, and is fair criteria, IMO.
I do think the subject context was necessary, especially given how personal the album was, where I mostly got hung up was the “Don’t Be Tough” aside.
March 11, 2025 @ 6:50 am
Isbell’s acoustic playing on many of the tracks is dynamic and interesting – which is hard on acoustic. He’s not a boring guitar player and his playing makes it easier to imagine how a full band would sound on some of these tracks. I tend not to prefer acoustic music – especially if it’s done acoustic as a gimmick. The dynamics of a full band can help sell a song and illicit more emotion. Anyway, I don’t think Isbell gets enough credit for his guitar playing.
March 10, 2025 @ 10:58 am
Been a long-time fan, and wanted to like it, but I just don’t care for this album. The songwriting is a major step down for me. His worst in a long time.
March 10, 2025 @ 12:43 pm
I thoroughly enjoyed the album. There are some haunting lines that stick with you and send chills up your back. Divorce, heartbreak and resilience are not easy to address well but Isbell does a great job. I’ve listened a few times and each time a new song becomes a favourite.
As a Calgarian, I appreciate you filling in the blank for the Calgary reference in “Open and Close”. He’s playing a bar during the Calgary Stampede this July so I hope he busts it out.
March 10, 2025 @ 12:47 pm
I’ve only listened to it once but it seemed awfully specific to me instead of universal. My favorite breakup album will always be Tunnel of Love.
March 10, 2025 @ 6:09 pm
Agree, BSA. Tunnel of Love is a great album and the title song has to be one of the best songs ever written about how hard it is to be in a relationship.
March 11, 2025 @ 9:11 am
I responded to Desolation before I saw your post. Totally agree – I think it’s a masterpiece and the second side is particularly strong. I enjoyed it in HS when it was released and enjoy it on a different level being an empty nester and 24y of marriage behind me.
I like how it weaves through the stages of a relationship and ends with Valentine’s Day – perhaps a light of optimism after a rough story.
FWIW, Phil Collins has the best angry breakup songs. I Don’t Care Anymore, That’s All, Misunderstanding, If Leaving Me is Easy,
March 10, 2025 @ 1:01 pm
As others have said it sucks that people can’t separate their personal beliefs from an artist’s works. Also, with this album release I realized people are way too invested in celebrities’ lives… don’t they have their own issues to worry about?
Anyway I adore this album, though it’s basically made for me genre-wise.
People say the songwriting is worse, but I just think it’s different. I believe Jason mentioned in a recent article something similar. Not everything needs to be metaphors and symbolism, there’s more than one way to write a song.
I love the transition from Bury Me into Ride to Roberts thematically. In the former he sings “One lonely girl is all I need, to tie me to this world, make me believe” which leads into the follow up song where he optimistically sings about this new girl.
Eileen is just a solid Isbell song. Not much to say besides that, but it seems at least somewhat related to Shires. Interesting note is Eileen is apparently the name of his new girlfriend’s friend who she had painted some portraits of.
Gravelweed stands on it’s own. As you said, excellent melody and just a good tune. Not a fan of a line ending in “raise me” and the next ending in “raised” but that might be a bit nitpicky.
Don’t be tough is just a solid little tune, nothing groundbreaking. Little John Prine thing going on there.
Open and Close and Foxes in the snow is another little transition I really enjoy. Open and Close is an excellent song to me. Does an excellent job of conveying the exact feelings Jason was probably feeling in that instance. I feel like you can really visualize everything that’s happening. It’s a sweet song, almost lullaby-esque at times. Then it’s followed by the ominous and rather jarring Foxes in the Snow. While I’m not the biggest fan of the verses (both lyrically and sonically) I really enjoy what I guess I’d call the hook/chorus. That melody really works for me. The juxtaposition of these two songs, almost certainly talking about the same person, feels like it’s really trying to say something. I’m not quite sure what it is, but it just really seems like there is something to unpack.
Crimson and Clay and Good While it Lasted are probably my two favorite tracks on the album. Crimson and Clay can make you nostalgic and emotional about a place you’ve never even visited let alone grown up in (though where I’m from in New Jersey is usually referred to as “basically Alabama”). Good While It Lasted is just such a pleasure to listen to. It’s not overly complex, there’s no belting, it just works. Neat chord progression that doesn’t overdue it and what has to be one of my favorite choruses he’s written. Absolutely killer 1-2 punch.
True Believer doesn’t need much to be said. That’s a song Jason felt like he needed to write clearly, so I’m glad he did. Hearing it live was a different experience than the album recording. To me, live he came off much angrier. There was quite a bit more emotion in his voice singing the chorus.
Lastly there is Wind Behind the Rain. Great song to end the record with. I read that he wrote it for the first dance at his brother’s wedding. Makes a lot of sense for that. Another pleasant song to listen to that let’s you finish the record without a bad taste in your mouth, which I’m sure the rather bitter True Believer does to some.
It definitely finishes stronger than it starts, but I don’t think there is a bad song on the record. I think 8/10 is a fair rating. Though, the more I’ve listened to it the more it creeps up towards a 9 for me.
March 10, 2025 @ 1:28 pm
“Lastly there is Wind Behind the Rain.”
You must be a huge fan of Bro Country.
If ever there was a Bro Country song, Wind Behind The Rain is certainly it.
March 10, 2025 @ 2:59 pm
This was an aggressively, aggressively stupid and embarrassing comment the first time you issued it, Di Harris. But keep on issuing it, and embarrass yourself even more. If you keep repeating it as a manta, maybe it will come true to somebody more than just yourself.
March 10, 2025 @ 7:05 pm
Is “Deeper Than The Holler” also bro country?
March 11, 2025 @ 5:50 am
This might be the dumbest of all the dumb things I’ve seen on this site.
March 11, 2025 @ 10:03 am
What a good little lemming you are.
My comment holds up.
March 12, 2025 @ 11:58 am
Is lady may bro country big dog?
March 10, 2025 @ 2:01 pm
I think the highs are still there but it’s a lot more like Here We Rest for me. 5-6 absolute bangers and 5-6 I’d call filler.
March 10, 2025 @ 2:11 pm
I could not understand Amanda’s frustration in that documentary. “Jason, why are you not incorporating my input into your music.” Uh, because it is not your record girl. It is his. And sorry but he is much better at this than you are. You have to know this.
I am no Isbell stan, but this is a fantastic record.
March 10, 2025 @ 3:15 pm
“The reference to a bolt action gun and leaving it behind is about all that passes for a ‘political’ moment on the album, and it’s a soft, passing one at that.”
FWIW…the narrator in “Crimson and Clay” discards the 1911 pistol that he keeps in his car, not the bolt action rifle that he received as a child.
March 10, 2025 @ 3:27 pm
For me a big payoff in this being an acoustic solo album (instead of with the 400 Unit) was in True Believer.
I think a recording of that one with a full band would have been less raw and powerful than the one we got.
March 10, 2025 @ 4:18 pm
I like this album a lot. Great songs, great lyrics, killer guitar playing.
I could care less about his family/love/politics drama.
Can’t we just put headphones on an listen to and enjoy an album? Seriously.
March 10, 2025 @ 6:05 pm
Right?!? I love you and your reviews Trig, but you more reviewed the artist than the art in this one. Even if that’s not totally correct, you set this comments section in motion by focusing too much on the artist. This album is no more personal that is the new Justin Wells album, Cynthiana. A straight review of this beautiful acoustic album, detached from the baggage people bring about the person, would not include most of the faults described in this review. This album is an easy 8.4.
March 10, 2025 @ 7:42 pm
“I could care less about his family/love/politics drama.”
That’s what this whole album is about. That’s what the songs are about. The whole point of this album, and the reason it was recorded acoustically is to capture the immediacy of Jason Isbell’s sentiments surrounding his divorce from Amanda Shires, and his relationship with his new girlfriend. This is also why the “exclusive” in “The Wall Street Journal” published on the release day was about these things specifically. To act like the family/love drama surrounding Isbell is irrelevant or unimportant is to be disrespectful of Jason Isbell’s songs, and refuse to listen to them to understand his perspective and meanings.
Furthermore, it’s Jason Isbell who has a history of using his relationship drama to market his music. He especially did this with “Reunions” about his blow up with Amanda Shires during the recording in a big spread in “The New York Times,” and later in the documentary about it. The idea that it is me who is imposing this drama onto the music I think is to grossly misunderstand the context in which it’s presented, which is Isbell bearing his emotional soul.
As for any political drama, this was wasn’t broached at all in the review proper, and only 1 out of the 11 song reviews mentioned it. And I do think Isbell is being hypocritical by singing “Don’t Be Tough,” and being a tough guy online. That is the reason you’re seeing the political acrimony in the comments here, not because the perspective of my review.
March 11, 2025 @ 4:49 pm
And I’d be shocked to find out that he’s not a jerk to waiters
March 11, 2025 @ 6:48 pm
I actually have primary sources on this!
Isabell’s lovely to waiters…and he’s also actually 6’3. Not “Tall for a singer; so we’ll call him ‘6’3.’”
I’ve heard less than great things about Amanda…but no one’s ever accused her of being as much of an insane, entitled asshole as Phoebe Bridgers.
March 12, 2025 @ 12:14 pm
There is a vocal group of people who will say “I don’t want to listen to that artist’s music because they are a liberal.” I think those people are a vocal minority who crave a sense of tribalism. For me if an artists goes too far in saying something that I find offensive it still won’t taint their past music but it may affect how I view their current and future music.
March 10, 2025 @ 5:41 pm
This is NPR music. Boring.
March 10, 2025 @ 9:00 pm
Divorce albums begin and end with Shoot Out the Lights by Richard and Linda Thompson.
March 11, 2025 @ 6:18 am
Shoot Out the Lights is great but that title goes to Tunnel of Love.
March 11, 2025 @ 2:24 am
I read all of these comments and I just can’t believe how nobody has said anything about how insanely beautiful, haunting, and how much the title track showcases his talent. For any of you guitar players, that Piedmont blues/Travis picking was so nuanced. The vocal delivery nails it as well. That is my favorite Isbell tune since before Southeastern.
Nobody said anything above about how his delivery has become truly next level.
I don’t give a crap about if he is a jerk or whatever. I have also not been a fan at all of the vanilla dad rock stuff they have been playing recently. I also do not really love a few of the “weaker” tunes on this album, but it has some legendary moments on it.
March 11, 2025 @ 3:39 am
Yeah, part of the lead up to Weathervanes was Shires saying she prefers his harder rocking stuff, because “anyone” can play songs in the style of Southeastern…and I’m pretty sure it’s the same interview where Isbell says that the kid comes first, but the art comes second.
March 12, 2025 @ 8:35 am
Thanks, I had never heard that interview… that’s very telling that she would characterize a truly great album like Southeastern that way. Just very interesting. I much prefer his acoustic and stripped down stuff. I certainly hold a different worldview than Isbell (I don’t like to say “political”), but have tried to disassociate the person and art. It doesn’t always work, but I do keep coming back to listen. Have enjoyed this album.
March 14, 2025 @ 1:12 pm
Do you think Amanda preferred the harder rocking stuff because it provided more of a challenge for her musicianship and gave her more exciting opportunities to show-off and highlight her masterful playing? Like, she really pushed some limits with the work she did on Take it Like a Man. I’m probably never going to listen to it again, but I can recognize what a force it is.
March 13, 2025 @ 12:37 pm
Agree, the main travis picking part in the title track is excellent and sounds like Tommy Emanuel. “Don’t Be Tough” sounds like an ode to “Streets of Bakersfield” by Merle Haggard/Buck Owens.
March 14, 2025 @ 1:16 pm
Thank you, Stanley, for being my best friend today!! I have been scraping the walls of my brain since my “first listen” trying to figure out what in-the-freakin’-Dwight-Yoakum-song was happening there. You got me out of the ditch there, buddy. Appreciate you. 🙂
March 11, 2025 @ 5:17 am
I give this album a 2, It is literal shit, and i mean shit… He lost his muse with Amanda , because she was honest to him about his songs….Obviously, nobody was honest with him on this one. I think this album is just him trying to show off his new teeth and new girlfriend because he f’d up his marriage when his head got too big bc of the fame. Anyway….2 stars…out of 10. And i’m not a hater, i love Isbell’s music, but this a bigger trash fire than the wildfires in Cali were.
March 11, 2025 @ 6:29 am
I listened to it on the road yesterday afternoon and sonically it holds up well as an acoustic album. His guitar playing is strong. Some of these songs should have a full band version. Foxes in the Snow was at the bottom for me.
March 11, 2025 @ 9:42 pm
Acoustic solo studio album and then a full band live album focusing on said studio release is often a best of both worlds situation (then you can build your own ideal version of the album between the versions)
March 11, 2025 @ 6:58 am
Just want to say this album is really great. We are both bama born and I’ve been following you since i saw the truckers in ’03 at h’ville crossroads. time flies!
March 11, 2025 @ 7:39 am
I gave it a couple of listens yesterday and its not bad, but not what I am looking for at the moment. Maybe it’s due to being so far removed from a break-up in my own life. The writing is good as is his playing and I do tend to like acoustic music, but something is missing for me. If I was giving it a rating I’d give it 6.5 ⭐️ .
March 13, 2025 @ 8:27 am
That’s exactly where I find myself Chris S…a long way from my last break up and again, it just sounds so specific to his situation generally. I will listen to it more I’m sure and my opinion might change but I am kind of with you on the 6.5-7 scale.
March 11, 2025 @ 8:08 am
I like this record because it focuses on universal themes. We all know about Isbell’s politics, but I believe he shines brightest when he makes music that most everyone can relate to, no matter what side of the political spectrum we live on. Everyone knows what it’s like to fall in love, and lose that love. we all know about disappointment and happiness. we all know about the kind of Anger, joy and pain that comes with the human experience. I hate that his marriage broke up, but I’m glad it’s caused him to make a record that I can relate to.
March 11, 2025 @ 10:52 am
This guy again??
March 11, 2025 @ 12:05 pm
Love Isbell but…
Is there a worse artist at picking singles prior to album release. (See: last two albums)
He consistently uses the worst songs on the entire album. How is Foxes a single? It kinda sucks.
9/10 for me, it’s a growe
March 11, 2025 @ 1:29 pm
I think “Bury Me” is being uderrated, but it’s not one of the best songs on the album. “Foxes in the Snow” might be the worst track on the album. 100% agree the single selection was a bad call. “Death Wish” was also a terrible pick.
March 12, 2025 @ 10:54 am
It’s funny; I liked both of them. I liked Foxes in the Snow on the first listen. I think it’s the ominous lyrics and theme of the song that draw me to it. It’s mysterious, and I feel like it’s one of the better-written songs on the album. Simple and the message is still not clear.
Bury Me had me excited that he was going in a traditional bluegrass direction. You can imagine Billy Strings singing the same song and taking it to a new level. So I was a bit disappointed that its the only song in that realm.
March 11, 2025 @ 9:14 pm
A “folk singer” is a country singer-songwriter who sounds like an average Joe.
Just an observation.
March 11, 2025 @ 10:01 pm
Amanda if you’re reading this il give it to you better than Jason ever did and you can play your mandolin or whatever it is you do all over my next album.
March 12, 2025 @ 6:15 am
Not surprised an Isbell album has received 106 comments here. Not sure anyone will read 107. But I have noticed a trend on these artists who have become more political spokesman than musicians these days. A majority of the comments will be either be negative political commentary, or people saying that if you can’t separate the music from the politics you are stupid. Yet these same people will take make the same but opposite positions if the political affiliations are reversed.
Truth is that when a public figure jumps on their soapbox and throws themselves into political fires, it does taint the product that they put out to the buying public. And yes there is a difference between an artist who puts subtle hints into their art of their political leanings, and those that beat you over the head on social media and in the press.
So I have no impression on the latest Isbell album. Why? For the same reason I won’t be reading the latest Stephen King book, or watch the latest movie starring Alex Baldwin or the other host of blabbering movie stars. I don’t like them. Some lame statement about enjoying the art despite the artist that you don’t believe yourself won’t change my mind.
March 12, 2025 @ 10:48 am
I completely agree. For me, it’s subjective; if you have some really good music that speaks to me, I can overlook things like this. So, with Jason, I still follow his music. Now, with Zach Bryan, I like his music, but after his constant immature behavior, I am just not into it anymore.
We humans naturally try to always make everything black or white or right or wrong. Just like most things, this is on a spectrum that lives in the gray. So I agree with your sentiment but disagree that there is anyone right or wrong in this situation.
March 12, 2025 @ 3:00 pm
Don’t think we really disagree. I have no problem with you listening to, or being a fan of Isbell. Just pointing out how people will get on their high horses to defend those they agree with and try to belittle those who disagree. Then they take the opposite approach with artists they don’t agree with. Artists are free to express themselves regardless of their opinion or they are not.
For me, I’m saying I’m sick of celebrities and their opinions. Many have become nothing more than arrogant talking heads, and their art nothing more than jingles and commercials for the parties they support. I’ll pass. Others are free to enjoy what they like.
March 12, 2025 @ 6:34 pm
Ironically enough…here we have a comment that essentially boils down to a jingle:
“He said something on Twitter one time that hurt my fee-fees, so I refuse to listen to any of his music…and I’m now desperately trying to find an ‘intellectual’ way to justify my fragility, since no one can pretend this latest album is ‘political.'”
Isbell has directly, and viciously, insulted Trigger…who managed to put on his big boy pants and listen to this incredibly non-political album.
But here you are, a buttercup utterly incapable of sucking it up.
Weak.
Sad.
March 12, 2025 @ 7:17 pm
You’re just proving my point dipstick. I tried not to get too much into left or right, because there are artists on the other side from Isbell who are much the same.
But I notice it’s almost always the left that goes off the hinges at any mere hint of someone leaning towards the right. Carrie Underwood is a recent example. Then the orange man bad comments fly, followed by the name calling like Nazi, white supremacist, and MAGA hillbillies. Yet you want everyone else to put politics aside for love of the art.
Give me a break hypocrite. It’s people like you and your favorite hypocrite celebrities who are the reason people have become fed up.
And I still don’t like Isbell. Your tantrum won’t change that either. Have a nice day.
March 13, 2025 @ 7:18 am
He never use to call anybody names when he was drawing 700 people a show. Once he made his bank, he turns into a libiot shitshow. Songs of white guilt, popping off at certain hats…. fuck him. Not another dime or the effort to go see his show.
March 14, 2025 @ 6:12 am
Even if Jason hadnt upset him on social media hed be reviewing the album, its just that because jason upset him on social media that any chance he can get to bring it up or take a shot at him it happens. Most of us move on from things said on social media a lot quicker because its not real life.
Trigger writes excellent reviews mostly the jason isbell stuff its just so obviously a vendetta that people should just have a big laugh at it.
March 14, 2025 @ 7:31 am
Jason Isbell’s last major album “Weathervanes” got a monster score here, was nominated for Album of the Year, and “King of Oklahoma” WON Song of the Year in 2023. People seem to forget all this stuff when they talk about my supposed Jason Isbell vendetta. If I hated the guy, I probably wouldn’t cover this album at all. If you think not mentioning anything about politics in the review proper, and not mentioning it at all in 10 of the 11 song reviews I did (which by the way, I don’t do for everyone) is somehow taking a run at Jason Isbell for his politics, that speaks more to your sensitivity than my bias.
March 13, 2025 @ 8:59 am
Well said, Scott S.
March 13, 2025 @ 10:35 am
Thanks. Honestly didn’t think anyone would read, much less reply, on comment #107 of a two day old article. While most album reviews here receive about 25 comments with big names getting a few more, it demonstrates how Isbell has become known less as a music artist than as a political firebrand.
March 14, 2025 @ 12:49 pm
Or it just demonstrates that people on the right are soft and can’t handle even a completely non-political album because of the name on it.
Guess we’re not all so different after all.
Would be interested in when the last conservative artist that the left hates put out a completely non-political album and they all lost their minds in a comment section here. It’s probably happened, but I haven’t been around these parts all that long.
March 15, 2025 @ 4:02 pm
Don’t worry, Wilder – folks like Scott S have so much time alone that they’ll be screeching on about how no one listens to [Shit Singer] at the soonest opportunity.
There are only so many times that his mommy can complain about blood on his socks before he makes a change.
(Narrator:
No change is made.
Scott’s mommy prays someone will ever fuck him and take him off her hands.
No one ever does.
Scott starts dressing like mommy…and blames TEH LIBSSSSS”
March 12, 2025 @ 6:12 pm
Country music needs to be made for us, our history, our culture, our traditions and our way of life. Isbell embodies none of that. He’s a whiny sjw woke moron who peddles his communist trash to others, who judging by this comment section, lap it up, and willingly. If isbell decides to say from his social media accounts and on stage that he doesn’t want any fans who are conservative, tries to cancel Morgan Wallen and acts like a self righteous prick asshole, then he and his fans shouldn’t be surprised that he gets massive pushback because of how he acts and behaves. Like all those who share his stances in this industry: get the fuck out of my town, city and industry.
March 12, 2025 @ 7:15 pm
Nobody is calling Jason Isbell country music, including Jason Isbell. He’s been pretty outspoken on this point, and it’s only ill-informed people who claim he’s a “country” artist.
“get the fuck out of my town, city and industry.”
You might want to check the last few election maps. Nashville is solid blue.
March 12, 2025 @ 7:34 pm
“You might want to check the last few election maps. Nashville is solid blue.”
Laughing …
Yet again, another unhinged and misinformed comment from you.
March 12, 2025 @ 8:37 pm
Check the maps Di, any map. Just because you don’t want it to be true doesn’t mean it isn’t.
Anyone, ANYONE who knows anything about Nashville that knows Nashville is a blue city, and this is of absolute verifiable statistical certitude.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election_in_Tennessee#/media/File:Tennessee_Presidential_Election_Results_2024.svg
Now fuck off.
March 12, 2025 @ 9:03 pm
Why are you covering him then? You said it yourself, isbell was a dick to you personally, and is a dick in general to everyone. He’s not country. So why review it? You know people like myself and others are going to rightly call him what he is and it sounds like you agree with good reason. Your review space would be better spent on up and coming country artists, classic legends like that strait review, or general what’s going on in country world type musings. He’s literally hated by half the country, evidently hates YOU, and is a massive fucking asshole. These things aren’t up for debate, that’s literally who he is. Why give him space? Why write about him at all. His music doesn’t sell, he’s admitted he’s an abusive asshole, who treated his exwife like shit and his claim to fame is he was such a waste of life as a junkie he got fired from his own band. A little hint there trigger, we don’t want to hear anymore about this prick. Like, at all. For all I care he can join Rosie and get the fuck out of my country.
March 15, 2025 @ 11:18 am
First, because it’s my fucking website and I’ll cover whatever the hell I want. I don’t charge people money to read. If you don’t want to read it, leave it.
I posted 122 individual album reviews last year alone and post 13 articles per week. There are over 9,000 published articles on this website. I don’t need someone to tell me I’m not doing enough to support country artists.
No, Jason Isbell is not country. He’s Americana. That is the reason I published a Dewey Decimal System for country, and every review is marked with it at the top. Americana is country adjacent. Isbell has been covered by Morgan Wallen, Zac Brown, and other country artists. There are country song on this record.
While you’re screaming at me for covering this record from the right, folks are screaming at me from the left for being so bias and bringing up Isbell’s politics in the review. Simply mentioning his name makes people politically incited (your comments is the perfect example), and I’m very sorry about that, but that’s not my problem. If I hadn’t covered this album, it would have been taken as a political action too, and people would have screamed at me. This is the polarized environment Isbell has created around himself. But leave me out of it. I’m just trying to cover the music people want to read about.
March 15, 2025 @ 10:47 am
Well, he’s (strangely) playing at some bluegrass festival this year, so somebody must think he’s country music.
March 15, 2025 @ 11:19 am
I’ve seen Tenacious D play the Telluride Bluegrass Festival. They always book a few country/roots/Americana artists, just like many country/roots/Americana festivals will book a few bluegrass artists. Jason Isbell is completely appropriate and intuitive to Telluride.
March 13, 2025 @ 9:51 pm
Good evening, Hey. Regarding your first comment, who is the “us” that country music needs be made for, to reflect “our” traditions? Are Charley Pride or Darius Rucker part of that “us?” What about Ray Benson Seifert, you know, the Jewish guy from Philly? I wonder where Charley Crockett fits in to the “us” that is somehow the country music exclusive club?
You know that Andy Statman got multiple ovations at the Opry, right? I wonder if he fits into “our traditions and our culture and our way of life?”
How about that Canadian dude Hank Snow? Or that crazy ANZAC Keith Urban? Jo Dee Messina grew up in suburban Boston.
Seems to me that a drunk from Alabama like Jason Isbell would be more acceptable for your criteria of who owns country music than anybody named above.
But hey, if you don’t like Trigger talking about drunks from Alabama who also release acoustic singer-songwriter albums, maybe find another blog that fits your traditions and culture better?
March 14, 2025 @ 11:05 am
All those artists came in and respected country music, its fans, and its traditions. Well, Urban used to. Pride spent decades talking about how great country music was to him. He claimed kinship. His sister asked him why he listened to Hank Williams albums, claiming it was White man’s music. Pride accurately responded, “It is my music too.” And it was because he made country music. Rucker has done the same – his only sin has been wasting his good voice on bland radio fodder for singles.
Isbell simply doesn’t do the same. He is a scalawag.
March 13, 2025 @ 5:48 am
…fascinating, jason isbell, the man whose live was saved by his now divorced wife amanda shires from drowning in substances just over a decade ago, releases a very personal album dealing with this family tragedy of some magnitude and some folks around here, miss or dismiss this heart of the matter completely for stances that are absolutely irrelevant to this very sad outcome of something that started and blossomed – “cover me up” – on such an incredibly high note.
at this particular point it does not matter at all what isbell’s position on pretty much anything is, except trying to come to terms with a seriously tragic development in his live artistically, which he does in true artist’s fashion even publicly with this album. those, who are just not able to understand and value that, may just return to their center seats on the grand stand of imbeciles.
March 13, 2025 @ 8:44 am
Celebrity dilettante…he’ll never do better than Shonna Tucker.
March 13, 2025 @ 9:00 am
Celebrity couples who plaster their relationship all over social media are fair game for tabloids and fan speculation.
Neither Isbell nor Shires sound like easy people to live with.
The danger of being a muse is that sometimes the content isn’t positive.
March 13, 2025 @ 9:55 pm
Country, I agree with your comment, but while I like the album and might listen to it more, it’s also true that if I got divorced and had a kid who was going to listen to my music this sure as hell wouldn’t be the album I’d put out.
Can you imagine what his daughter is going to think of this when she’s in her 20’s, except, ewww, WTF, dad?
That’s one reason I can’t totally separate the art from the man- because I know there are innocents who may also suffer from his muse.
March 14, 2025 @ 11:14 am
I agree with your overall take. This album is impossible to separate from the man because it is personal.
Isbell is too self-absorbed for that self-reflection. But hey, she can join her peers whose mothers posed for OnlyFans in therapy! Most people never think about tomorrow – they only in today.
March 14, 2025 @ 1:39 pm
Were you *here* for the discussion about – hang with me a minute – how incensed Justin Townes Earle’s widow, Jen, was about Jason writing the JTE “death song” (When We Were Close,” I think) on “Weathervanes” because of the pain and misery it caused her kid when she played it for the 8-year old daughter?
Two observations:
1) Jason Isbell puts it out there and lets the chips, hearts, relationships, and whatever else fall where they may. Maybe it’s artistic integrity; maybe it isn’t, but a lot of people claimed Isbell would NEVER write a song that might hurt is own kid in the future. hashtag:wrong
2) Amanda Shires and her fierce mother will protect Daddy’s little pumpkin from the pain of “True Believer” as long as they possibly can. It’s what I’d do.
March 15, 2025 @ 4:29 pm
Pam, I did see those comments re: When We Were Close and I guess I figured even someone as egotistical as Jason Isbell (and to be clear, lots of great artists have huge egos) wouldn’t put out something that their own kid would find horrible someday.
But I guess I figured wrong.
And it’s still an album I’ll probably listen to again because some of the songs are pretty good and his particular situation has pieces to which many people can connect.
March 13, 2025 @ 12:42 pm
How comes a man in his 40’s now sings like he’s sporting dentures? Very forgettable album.
March 13, 2025 @ 1:13 pm
Oh, and Cody Canada oughta have a word with Mr. Isbell re: ‘Crimson and Clay’, because that opening riff is almost identical to ‘Back Around’.
March 15, 2025 @ 4:38 pm
Because he IS sporting dentures now, but they’re the bougie ones that get surgically implanted instead of living in a Memaw-jar on the bed table at night.
March 18, 2025 @ 7:24 am
Trig- been laughing about your analysis of “Foxes in the Snow” for a solid hour. A buddy of mine and I have a running joke about how historians will look back at Isbell and marvel at the fact that one man could write something as profound as “Speed Trap Town” and something as inane as “Anxiety.” You perfectly captured how I felt about “Foxes in the Snow,” too, which is that it arguably should not exist.