Billboard’s Senior Country Chart Manager Departs. What It Could Mean

Unless you work in the country music industry, the name Jim Asker probably doesn’t ring a bell to you. But as Billboard’s senior manager of the country music charts, some of his decisions over the last decade have been the most titanic, and historically significant in the genre’s history. Taking over the role from Wade Jessen who held the position for 20 years previously, Asker presided over the moments that have made the term “country” more open, more obfuscated from its original meaning, and more confused and full of conflict than ever before.
When Jim Asker took over the position in 2015 while presiding over the Christian and Gospel charts as well, country music and the Billboard charts were already going through a dramatic period of transition. The country songs charts had recently been split into one chart measuring radio play, and another measuring consumption in the “Hot Country Songs” chart. Billboard had also just ushered in an era where song streams were weighted in album calculations.
This was also at the height of Bro-Country when the boundaries in popular country were being pushed farther and wider than ever before.
The Billboard chart manager position could be considered one of the premier “gatekeepers” of the entire country music industry, if not the biggest gatekeeper since its their decision what ends up on the country charts, and what doesn’t. Early in his tenure, Jim Asker signaled that perhaps he would take this responsibility seriously, safeguarding what could be considered “country.” If anything, his definition was too austere when he forbid the Fort Worth-based band Green River Ordinance from appearing on the country charts, while acts like Sam Hunt and Florida Georgia Line appeared on the charts unquestioned.
Perhaps the most controversial and consequential decision Jim Asker ever made is when Lil Nas X’s “Old Town Road” first appeared on the Billboard Hot Country Songs chart at #19 on March 11th, 2019, before Asker decided the song actually wasn’t country, and removed it from the chart published March 18th, deciding Lil Nas X had purposely manipulated the track’s metadata, fully knowing it would chart higher if sent to country as opposed to hip-hop/R&B.
After Asker’s decision, Rolling Stone published an article called Lil Nas X’s ‘Old Town Road’ Was a Country Hit. Then Country Changed Its Mind on March 26th—a full nine days after the removal of the song. In fact a whole new weekly chart cycle had passed and been published when Rolling Stone chose to address the issue. However with the misleading headline of the article blaming “country music” as opposed to Billboard and Jim Asker for the removal—and with the insinuations by Rolling Stone that the removal had been racially motivated—it set off a media firestorm on if Lil Nas X had been a victim of racism.
Within days, the biggest story in all of entertainment media was how “country music” had removed Lil Nas X from the country charts because he was Black, with little context or counterpoints being offered about how and why Billboard and Asker had arrived at their conclusions. Strangely, Pitchfork, Salon, NPR, and other outlets falsely claimed it was Saving Country Music that somehow was responsible for the removal, even though SCM didn’t even address “Old Town Road” until after Asker made his decision.
Nonetheless, “Old Town Road” remained removed from country, and that decision stands to this day. But with the overwhelming claims of racism stemming from the incident, this set the table for the inclusion of other songs and albums that likely didn’t deserve to be considered for Billboard’s country charts, namely Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter, which the superstar herself said “ain’t a country album,” but Billboard chose to include in country anyway, likely knowing the backlash would be incindiary if they chose otherwise.
This issue would come up again when Beyoncé’s Cowboy Carter tour was also named the “biggest tour in Billboard boxscore history.”
But perhaps the most significant decision during Jim Asker’s tenure did not involve race at all. It was deciding that pop star Bebe Rexha’s song “Meant To Be” deserved to be on the Billboard Hot Country Songs chart despite not even characterizing itself as a country song, and simply because Florida Georgia Line appeared on the track.
To this day, it’s a pop star and a pop song that holds the Billboard Hot Country Songs record for the most weeks at #1 with 50. Bebe Rexha has subsequently never shown interest in country at all, and didn’t even know who Florida Georgia Line was when she collaborated with them. The song beat out another dubious Jim Asker inclusion in Sam Hunt’s “Body Like a Backroad” to earn the historic, and likely, insurmountable achievement.
By all accounts, Jim Asker is a good guy on a personal level. He’s a Leukemia survivor, despite at one point only being given weeks to live, and is an avid marathon runner. Billboard penned a glowing tribute to Asker ahead of his official departure on August 15th. No replacement has been named as of yet. Asker plans to return to academia where worked before taking the position at Billboard.
For the country music fans who believe that the genre should have some semblance of borders, however loosely defined, should they hold out hope that the departure of Jim Asker will usher in a new era where some sonic sanity returns to the Billboard Country charts? That feels like very wishful thinking. It might be difficult to impossible to put that genie back in the bottle with the precedents the Jim Asker era has now set. But one can hold out hope a new regime might mean a fresh approach.
But in truth, the cumulative decisions not just by Jim Asker, but the entirety of the Billboard universe have made the most important charts in the music industry virtually meaningless to many, if not the majority of the actual country music community. They have long ceased to measure the interests and economic activity of actual country music fans, and instead carry water for the agendas of individuals decidedly outside of the country music fold, often with ulterior purposes.
The false pretense that having country music sound like every other genre somehow celebrates “diversity” instead of ushering in the death of it—and demanding that non-country artists, albums, and songs be counted on country charts—has made those charts more irrelevant than ever. It’s a great illustration of how institutions attempting to placate the loudest voices in the room often results in winning (or avoiding) battles online, but losing the overall war.
– – – – – – –
If you found this article valuable, consider leaving Saving Country Music A TIP.
August 12, 2025 @ 12:53 pm
Off-topic question but how long does it take you to typically write an article?
August 12, 2025 @ 1:56 pm
It really depends on the article. The vast majority of my time is spent listening to albums, screening through albums considering them for review, and writing reviews. Since reviews are inherently cliche, they are extremely difficult, time consuming, and tedious to write. If an article requires a lot of research, it can take a lot of time as well. An article like this where I am very familiar with the subject matter so all the info is in RAM memory so to speak, I can knock it out in 90 minutes, believe it or not. Then it’s on to spending the next 90 minutes struggling to get two sentences written for my next album review.
August 12, 2025 @ 2:42 pm
Well, that explains it.
August 12, 2025 @ 2:44 pm
“Asker plans to return to academia where worked before taking the position at Billboard.”
LMAO
SMH
August 12, 2025 @ 2:46 pm
By “it” I mean the unspeakable dreck that plays on country radio and on hell’s soundtrack.
August 12, 2025 @ 3:26 pm
Hi Trigger! If you could write a four or five point “Code of Ethics” (I couldn’t come up with a more descriptive phrase) for the next person to sit in Asker’s position, what would you include?
August 12, 2025 @ 4:51 pm
To me, the two fundamental points to ask before including a song or album on a country charts is, 1) Does it sound more like another genre than it does country? 2) Is it 51% or more country?
The Billboard Hot 100 and the Billboard 200 Albums charts are there for the top pop artists to be measured against all the rest of music. The genre specific charts should be there to measure the music that fits specific genres. When you have pop and hip-hop artists being put on the country charts, this diminishes the country artists who are not trying to compete with pop, but with other country artists, while these pop stars gain little by country chart placement.
I’m not against Lil Nas X, Beyonce, Bebe Rexha, or any other artist. I wish them all the best. And if a pop artist actually wants to labor to make a country record, that should be considered for the country charts as well. But otherwise, these artists belong on the pop and hip-hop charts. We don’t demand country artists get recognized on the hip-hop charts. I don;t know why it’s seen as some sort of moral crusade to demand hip-hop artists be recognized as country.
August 12, 2025 @ 4:27 pm
I know I’m probably one of the few besides Trigger on here that actually reads the Billboard Country Music update newsletter that comes out every Tuesday with the charts of the “Hot Country Songs” filled with 90% Wallen and other drivel in the top 25 before you might get to the 2 Zach Top songs that are at #33 #34 today ….woo hoo!! Oh look there are 2 female artists in the top 25, Megan and Lainey. There are a lot of ads record companies pay for asking for “your consideration” to vote for their artists for CMA Awards, many of whom are nowhere near deserving, not to mention a few nobody has ever even heard of. I read it because I like to see if we’ve made any headway and if any of our favorites might squeeze in somewhere?
Looking at the Top Country Albums, we see Wallen in the top 3 spots, followed by Shaboozey, Post Malone, before we get to Childers, Bryan, and Top, that’s not so bad, and of course, looking towards the bottom, there’s Ella and Megan. Again, I just read them with my Tuesday morning coffee like I look at Baseball standings even though I don’t like most of the teams. I don’t trust what I see on these charts one bit. Let’s hope whoever takes over for this guy can fix it or shake it up.
August 12, 2025 @ 4:56 pm
Anddddd Beyoncé continues to live rent free…🙄
August 12, 2025 @ 8:48 pm
Or maybe a story about the significant decisions that the outgoing manager for Billboard’s country charts made would invariably mention Beyonce, and it would be peculiar if it didn’t. Tyler Childers, Jason Isbell, Sturgill Simpson, Taylor Swift, Eric Church, and so on and so forth also live rent free in my head. Or maybe, and just hear me out. Maybe, I run a country music website, and so these names have come up commonly over the years.
August 13, 2025 @ 4:24 am
Please.”Body Like A Backroad” at seven thirty in the morning ? WHY?
August 13, 2025 @ 2:13 pm
Trigger, I’ve been wondering about the different charts out there for Country Radio Airplay. Billboard is probably the most well known. But I’ve noticed that the other charts include artists that don’t chart on Billboard Country Airplay. For example, the current CDX Traction Mainstream Country chart includes songs by Ned LeDoux, Cody Jinks and even Eddy Raven. Here’s the link for it: https://cdxcharts.com/charts/songs/mainstream_country_singles
And there’s also the Mediabase Activator chart which has in the recent past included artists that don’t make Billboard, including veteran artists like Sawyer Brown and Shenandoah.
Are these charts considered on the same level or accuracy as Billboard Country Airplay?
August 13, 2025 @ 2:32 pm
Good question.
These radio charts are made up of “panels,” which are basically a group of 30-50 radio stations that send all their data to these charting roganizations, and then use it to tabulate the charts. So the reasons there’s differences in the charts is they’re made up of different radio stations in their panels.
This is one of the things that drives me crazy about country radio. These charts don’t represent country radio in its entirety. The often only represent a few big radio stations in a few big markets, all of which are going to skew mainstream. Even worse, if a station starts to play more classic country or more Texas/Red Dirt, this won’t necessarily influence the chart. These charting companies will kick them off the panel because they’re not “mainstream” enough.
There are actually a lot of independent artists getting radio play, and there would be more if stations wouldn’t get kicked off panels. But barely any of this is measured in these charts.
FYI, there are also individual charts for Texas Radio, and Americana. They tend to have many more of the artists you might see mentioned around here.
August 16, 2025 @ 11:23 am
To borrow a phrase from Trigger’s article, I hope it’s not too late “to put the genie back in the bottle” and install an actual gatekeeper at the country music gate.
If, objectively, a song has nothing to do with country, either musically or lyrically, it simply shouldn’t be allowed on the country chart. And just because a song was written and recorded in Nashville, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s country. In the same way, just because a product is manufactured in Detroit, it doesn’t necessarily mean it’s an automobile.
August 18, 2025 @ 7:40 am
As the manager for Green River Ordinance during their Red Fire Night / Fifteen era, I want to thank Trigger and Saving Country Music for helping light the fire.
In 2016, GRO had multiple number one hits on the Texas Country charts, a Top 3 iTunes Country album, strong support from Spotify and iHeart playlists, and were literally playing the Ryman and the Grand Ole Opry when Billboard told us they were not country enough.
Jim Asker made that call. I do not want to flatten Jim as a person. But the decision was still baffling, especially considering the other songs and artists being included at the time.
What followed proved to be even more significant. The Tennessean ran a front-page article with the Super Bowl winners on one half and Green River Ordinance on the other. The piece featured commentary from some of the top industry leaders at the time and dropped on the opening day of Country Radio Seminar, right when decision makers across the genre were tuned in.
Looking back, that moment ended up galvanizing the band’s identity more than a chart placement ever could have. It forced a bigger conversation about how country music defines itself and who gets counted. Trigger and SCM were instrumental in pushing that conversation forward when few others were willing to.
This was never just about one band. It is about the ongoing contradictions in how the genre draws its borders.
Credit where credit is due. This moment, this reflection, and possibly even the chapter would not of happened without the spark you guys helped ignite.