From Bad to Catastrophic: MULTIPLE AI Artists Now On Country Chart

As predicted, the matter of AI artists infiltrating Billboard’s country charts and the music industry in general has gone from bad to absolutely catastrophic in the matter of a singular human-measured week. And with AI’s exponential growth, we could be measuring the utter evisceration of the entire human-based recorded music industry in a matter of weeks—not months—unless dramatic, emergency steps are taken.
Forget “Saving Country Music.” This is about saving all music, and all human creative expression. This is an existential threat. You cannot be too hyperbolic in this moment. And the most alarming thing is that it might already be too late to do anything about it. AI music has escaped the lab, and those entrusted with protecting human creators are facilitating the pandemic levels of its spread, afraid of taking hard stances and being accused of “gatekeeping.”
Remember just earlier this week when you probably saw your favorite music outlet, social media influencer, or maybe even one of your favorite artists talking about how an AI “artist” named Breaking Rust topped the Billboard Country Digital Song Sales Chart with a 100% AI song called “Walk My Walk”? Well now the next week’s chart is out, and not only is “Walk My Walk” still at #1, another completely AI-generated artist named Cain Walker has 100% AI-generated songs at the #3, #9, and #11 spots on that same chart.
It’s AI artist Breaking Rust’s “Walk My Walk” at #1, Ella Langley’s “Choosin’ Texas” at #2, and AI artist Cain Walker’s “Don’t Tread On Me” at #3. We’re not just talking about an AI anomaly on the top of this particular chart. AI is dominating it.
That said—and this is extremely important to understand—this is only happening on Billboard’s Country Digital Songs Sales chart, which only measures downloads of songs. Despite much reporting and anecdotal accounts to the contrary, Breaking Rust’s “Walk My Walk” is not the #1 song in country music. In fact, it’s not even close. It’s only charting at all due to digital downloads, which are arguably the easiest metric to manipulate because spending $5,000+ to get 5,000 downloads can immediately put you in contention on this chart, if not topping it.
However, as we have seen the story about Breaking Rust’s “Walk My Walk” charting in country become the biggest story in all of music, this has created a feeding frenzy/Streisand Effect that has funneled even more attention, and even more spins, streams, and downloads for the song, along with a large share of press coverage and social media buzz boosting this song significantly, very specifically due to how the song is topping a chart.
There isn’t just one surreptitious market manipulation going on with these AI songs. There are multiple ones that go beyond the artificial generation of the artist and the track itself. Few if anyone downloads songs anymore, and the people that do are unlikely to find appeal in tracks like Breaking Rust’s “Walk My Walk” and Cain Walker’s “Don’t Tread On Me.” These AI artists are very likely being astroturfed via downloads, and probably via fake streams as well, as Billboard allows these songs to top and dominate one of their charts virtually unscrutinized.
If there is any silver lining, As Saving Country Music demanded be done earlier this week, these artists are being marked as “virtual acts” by Billboard. But that is the extent of the curation by the publication. Otherwise, they are being 100% permissive to these tracks, taking the download data at face value.
One question many people might have is, why has country been targeted by these AI artists as opposed to genres like pop, hip-hop, or dance/EDM where electronic-generated tracks and elements are common? Country is one of the very last genres where it is mostly human musicians playing actual instruments, and writing/singing songs organically.
There are likely multiple reasons for this. Remember when Lil Nas X gripped the music world when his single “Old Town Road” charted on the country charts in 2019? Lil Nas X and his manger Danny Kang admitted later that the reason Lil Nas X submitted the song to country as opposed to hip-hop was they knew it was likely to chart higher, and create a bigger buzz as opposed to just being another track in hip-hop.
In 2023 when addressing the emerging AI issue amid the rise of Chat GPT, the opinion was given that country music would be more insulated from AI’s effects specifically due to how country is more organic and human-based compared to other genres. But ironically, this might actually be the reason these AI creators are targeting country first. Some country fans are notoriously gullible, and country is also very popular right now. And if they can infiltrate country, the rest of music will be a piece of cake.
Also, Billboard’s country charts and chart managers have proven in the past to be managing the most permissive charts in all of music. As Beyoncé released an album even she said “ain’t a country album,” Billboard and other institutions rubber stamped it, worried about accusations of racism, while the communities of hip-hop, EDM, dance, rock, and even pop are more guarded and gated these days with what’s allowed in.
It wasn’t Lil Nas X’s inclusion on the country charts with “Old Town Road” that stimulated controversy. Barely anyone even paid attention. It was his removal that made it the most popular song in all of music, the biggest hit of 2019, and ultimately, one of the biggest songs of all time. Lil Nas X wanted to stir controversy to create the same kind of buzz we’re currently seeing for Breaking Rust’s “Walk My Walk.”
But even amid all the backlash, Billboard stood by their decision to remove “Old Town Road” from the country charts. It was the right decision then, and removing these AI songs that are clearly being artificially boosted (let alone artificially made) is the right decision now, and is likely to be met with applause as opposed to controversy. This is a Milli Vanill-level fraud being perpetrated on music consumers, facilitated by Billboard’s permissive approach to their charts.
There is a very big decision that needs to be made right here, right now. Will Billboard and other institutions put their foot down and disallow intellectual property pirates who are exploiting their permissive systems be the spark that ignites the AI revolution in music, and ironically, through the placement on a chart in a genre that prides itself in organic authenticity and instilling the human touch in its creative expressions? Or will they do the only reasonable thing and impede this unethical and surreptitious activity that is actively manipulating the market?
AI is here, and it will dominate the music industry sooner than later, irrevocably, and catastrophically for human creators. Every single other concern plaguing the industry is downstream from this. But it is in critically-important moments like this when decisions can be made that will at least give human creators a fighting chance moving forward, meaning not having to compete on charts with songs clearly made artificially, and boosted artificially.
Billboard must remove these AI tracks from the Country Digital Song Sales charts, if not because they’re AI, then because they’re being propped up by what is very likely fraudulent activity.
– – – – – – –
If you found this article valuable, consider leaving Saving Country Music A TIP.

November 13, 2025 @ 1:37 pm
The sure fire fix is to throw the charts out the window because they were already messed up by attempts to turn stream counts into album purchases and efforts to game the system (outright fraud). How much does Billboard really matter to your average non-music exec non-marketing/advertising person?
November 13, 2025 @ 4:01 pm
Billboard’s charts matter dramatically less after they put them behind a paywall, and made them inaccessible to the vast majority of music fans. So yes, they’re now more just an industry tool, which in my opinion, has been a catastrophic mistake for their brand and company, and aided in the downfall of music literacy.
That said, every single news outlet in America is running stories about how an AI song is topping a country chart, and it’s one of the most talked about stories in America behind the Epstein revelations. Many of the stories and posts are falsely saying the song is #1 in country, or that it’s #1 on THE country chart, once again, because people just don’t know one chart from another. So in this case, this Billboard chart is EVERYTHING. It’s the entire reason we all know these songs and artists exist. That is exactly what the people behind these songs were banking on, and Billboard is playing right into their hands.
November 14, 2025 @ 9:39 am
“That said, every single news outlet in America is running stories about how an AI song is topping a country chart, and it’s one of the most talked about stories in America behind the Epstein revelations.”
Interesting example of different news bubbles here, I guess. I haven’t seen this story in a single place besides on Saving Country Music. I just did a scroll through all of my usual news sources, and it’s not mentioned on the home page of a single one of them. Not sure what that says or means, but interesting to note.
I’m glad you’re drawing attention to it at least!
November 13, 2025 @ 4:22 pm
Charts. There are several things going on with this example.
1) country music has a rabidly loyal audience. WHY are we all not also regularly paying a tiny amount to download artists’ music? You don’t have to listen to it in that MP3 format, but it’s a cheap way to tip people.
If it only takes 3000 songs to make a huge effect on the digital sales charts, it becomes obvious that legitimate digital sales of legitimate songs SUPER low. People mentioned the 3k number a couple years back in the context of Oliver Anthony. Surely there are 3k of us
I know we all buy vinyl sometimes but it’s just so so so so cheap and easy to tip your favorite artists by buying a digital download. you can buy an entire digital album for about $10- you have to look to see if it’s on bandcamp or the artist’s own website or AMazon Music, but there’s always a way to buy the thing- and they list tracks separately so you can always just buy a song for a dollar, and it’s still more money than they get from you listening to it on Spotify.
Think of it as tipping and make it a regular part of your music apprecitaiotn. I try to make a habit of spending x dollars a month on digital music even though I still usually just listen to the same music on streaming.
There are lots of ways to generate viral attention to an artificially promoted track (whether we’re talking about AI ‘music’, or other schemes that people have done in the past. I mentioned in another comment that there’s a crazy “influencer” from Connecticut who attempted to go viral by buying chart placement in a tiny African iTunes chart and then advertising that he was a legitimate hit singer who was “#1 on iTunes” wihtout mentioning what kind of chart the hit was on. He failed to gain traction because he’s truly awful, but there have been other similar schemes. I’m sure people use bots when they want to manipulate streaming charts but that’s not not the only way to go.
Lastly, AI music hitting hte charts, with some kind of artificial manipulation- this kind of stuff has been happening in pop, jazz, ambient music, and other genres for many years now, I think even going back to pre-pandemic. It’s new in country music (as of the past couple of years ) because AI vocals are SORTA better now but it’s affected all the ‘lean-back listening’ (background music) genres for years and years.
November 14, 2025 @ 9:21 am
Oh, I always buy merch and albums. I have a pile of albums, mostly still wrapped and unlistened to on physical media, so that I can 1 – support the artists and 2 – have a physical copy. It’s just bullshit games with the numbers that that counts differently than streams or downloads to the degree that it does, and now in order for the numbers to actually reflect my appreciation for the music I have to get the merch and the CD and then download the album too. It was bad before MP3s, but somehow now it’s even more expensive to support the artist than before and even harder to tell if you are actually supporting them or if that money is being siphoned off by some asshole in a suit.
And I think you’re just proving my point with Oliver Anthony – the charts mean NOTHING outside of the gamesmanship. The charts are miserable at actually measuring fan engagement with the music. If you actually look at the numbers provided by Spotify, Travelin’ Soldier has about twice as many streams and has been out only a week instead of a month. Especially interesting is that from the stats I can find, most of the AI slop streams have come since the articles started appearing. Is it possible that all of the fans of Travelin’ Soldier are only on Spotify and none of them are on Apple Music or Youtube*? Sure. Does that really explain how the AI slop is ahead in the Billboard charts?
Interestingly, I just had a conversation about precision engineering and the craftsman movement of the 1920s and how things that are handmade feel better that sounded almost exactly like what we’re talking about. Not unlike the latest Marvel schlock vs an original story that isn’t a reboot (Severance/Game of Thrones/Ted Lasso, or even new stories set in familiar worlds, like Andor). We learn NOTHING from our past.
* Youtube is a bit of a challenge because apparently he’s been covering Travelin’ Soldier live for years, so there are many videos of it available with a combined tens of millions of streams plus the not that many streams for the ‘studio visualizer’ video.
November 14, 2025 @ 2:02 pm
I think the issue is not so much the charts but just the whole concept of virality in general. That’s caused so many different problems when it comes to Art and media.
The digital sales chart is just a jumping off point for this specific virality strategy that I think Oliver Anthony used as well as these yahoos.
November 13, 2025 @ 1:38 pm
Somebody wake up Hicks.
November 13, 2025 @ 1:45 pm
Rick Beato pointed out the other day how the Breaking Rust song had 3k in downloads. All someone has to do is pay 3k for a song to be 1# in the digital downloads category. The negative attention and views are still views and possibly generating ad revenue. My view is that this trend will die out quicker if it’s allowed to become absurdly popular and people realize how dumb it is.
I also feel vindicated in my complaints of heavily pitch corrected artists being a slippery slope for these AI songs. If some producer is using software to help with heavy pitch correction and the finished song is nothing like a singer’s raw vocal, that isn’t far removed from AI making an entire song.
Can we all collectively agree to shame the retards making songs with Suno? You aren’t an artist of any kind for using Suno.
November 13, 2025 @ 2:45 pm
“Rick Beato pointed out the other day how the Breaking Rust song had 3k in downloads. All someone has to do is pay 3k for a song to be 1# in the digital downloads category.”
And all someone has to do to be mentioned by Rick Beato who is one of the biggest YouTubers in music is get to #1 on the Digital Song Sales chart with an AI song. That not a bad return on investment at all, and the reason country music and that chart were targeted specifically. What Billboard is being permissive to this, I can’t explain.
November 13, 2025 @ 2:54 pm
Billboard doesn’t have any reverence for Country music as a genre so it’s not a surprise. If 3k downloads was the most downloads of any song in the genre, then it’s inclusion makes sense…if the downloads were organic. If someone paid for the downloads that should be flagged as fraud.
Cody Wolfe is turning over in his entry level job in Connecticut right now thinking about how he should have used AI.
November 13, 2025 @ 3:44 pm
lol Cody Wolfe
no, don’t google that. It’s a crazy guy from Connecticut who a few years ago bought a #1 spot in something like the south African charts (similar to how the scheme Trigger is descriing works) and did a photoshoot with an airplane (there are places you can pay to sit in a private plane for a photoshoot if you want to pretend to own one), and then pretended for years that he was a #1 hit country singer. The only ‘real’ evidence of him existinfg is him playing a show at a pizza place in Connecticut. It’s the wildest example of influencer fraud, but he was just so so so so so bad at it it was hilarious. He also stalked BJ Barham for a minute. It was wild.
November 14, 2025 @ 6:53 am
lmao wait what
November 14, 2025 @ 8:28 am
The Cody Wolfe saga is hilarious. It goes back 10 years or so. He even started a beef with Bobby Bones and got mentioned on his show – but that’s since been scrubbed from the internet. 5 years ago or so he even sang the National Anthem at some Vandy game (I think) and posted it on his instagram and was getting completely ripped for how bad it was. There are many other stories.
November 13, 2025 @ 1:49 pm
To quote a REAL song written by REAL people, “Ain’t Nothing Like The Real Thing Baby”!
I like your solution Trigger, label these songs with an AI designation. Then we can avoid them like the plague!
November 13, 2025 @ 2:16 pm
If they start infiltrating the catalog of Billy Joel or Kristofferson, I am going to put on the brass knuckles and there will be some rearranging of visages!
I am terrified what AI is going to do for artistic expression, cancel culture, and a host of other things that can drastically impact real and good people.
November 13, 2025 @ 2:32 pm
It wouldn’t be hard to do ‘Uptown Server’ or ‘Sunday Morning Unexpected Shutdown’
November 13, 2025 @ 2:21 pm
I was listening to ‘The Managers Playbook’ podcast yesterday and learned (at the 51-minute mark) that Old Town Road originated from a video game. Lil Nas X made a song inspired by the game and then it was being posted on memes which is how it went viral (and no labels were interested)…and then it jumped to TikTok (and labels got interested when they saw $$). He got signed because of this. So essentially an independent sync song that gained popularity within the gaming community evolved to the country arena. Marketing > music. This seems to be the real problem with music. It’s no longer about the quality of the music – it’s chasing the next viral moment, coming up with creative ways to sneak your songs into established/niche communities, and milking as many ‘stories’ as you can on social media (out of every aspect of your life & musical life). We are in an era where the music industry has become the reality show industry. Just as reality shows replaced music videos on MTV, now these things are replacing the importance of actual music. Luke Combs was on the Armchair Expert podcast (38-minute mark) where he talked about this. You have to market your story and/or game the system in some way in order to make headway. And even if you do make the headway, the audience’s attention span is 30 seconds or less. So while I do agree that there are many things that need to be ironed out with AI (and that it is scary and messy), AI is the Napster of this generation – it is the broken music ecosystem that is the problem and no one wants to fix it because those at the top still make their $$. The ones who truly control the music ecosystem are suing Suno and making it look like they care about artists, but they really care that their bottom line is being threatened by AI. Labels apparently decide who goes #1, ‘country songs’ spend 52+ weeks on the charts, and true talent continues to be overlooked by awards shows. Music venues appear to be in trouble, musicians are forced to be monkeys who dance for the camera while making $.003 or living in the red and questioning why the even continue to do it. I like Rick Beato’s take on this AI song ‘going #1’, but because the music industry is such a cluster – adding AI seems to be like putting a paperweight on this house of cards. For those who work full time, have a disability that prevents them from performing, don’t have the funds, or live in remote places – but still have a passion for music – AI is a nice tool to use to be able to express yourself. I also saw another clip of the CEO of the Grammy’s (I think-trying to remember the post I saw earlier this morning) saying that he has seen AI in action in every room he has been in over the past year. Surely there are watermarks (so to speak) embedded in AI assisted songs and when you submit them to music distributors those are noticed and could be flagged as AI assisted songs? I heard someone else bring up the point that when AI is trained on listening to music – that is where things will get even more sketchy…although aren’t we already there with all the ‘bots’ and paying for boosts and plays? Are streaming numbers even real? I don’t know…
November 13, 2025 @ 2:48 pm
You aren’t actually expressing yourself if computer software is doing the vocals, music, and the lyrics. Without sugar-coating it, if you cannot sing, or play an instrument, or write lyrics, then you have nothing to “express” in the first place. It reminds me of certain coworkers who felt that they had creativity deep inside them but they didnt know how to express it, didn’t have any actual talent, yet still felt that they had creativity in them. ..They didn’t.
I realize I’m being “mean-spirited” but this literally is where the line is as far as what defines “music.” If the line isn’t there then AI-music is valid.
November 13, 2025 @ 3:05 pm
I guess I tend to think (and speak) in terms of the ‘I use AI partially’ crowd and don’t really think or speak about those who use it for a 100% AI generated song. I feel like with those songs it is obvious (for now) that they are 100% AI generated and not worth anyone’s time. But I agree with you. Once the AI gets trained up well – will it produce decent songs in the 100% prompt situation with no human input whatsoever? I am against the 100% AI generated stuff, but feel like the AI at the moment is spitting out ‘Friday’ by Rebecca Black quality ‘songs’ in those instances.
November 13, 2025 @ 3:15 pm
Average people are using Suno to make complete songs that are of the same quality as the Breaking Rust song. This dog park friend on my Facebook has been posting AI created music – with a complete band and AI-generated vocals – and it has the same level of production as the Randy Travis AI song. Passively listening thru an iPhone speaker the AI-generated instruments are hard to distinguish from actual instruments.
November 14, 2025 @ 9:34 am
I think you can be an artist without talent and express yourself, it’s just nobody wants to hear it. A bad artist is still putting their feelings into the work, it’s just they can’t get the feelings to the music/canvas/sculpture. The AI “art” problem is that there are no feelings there from the AI, so even if it is a genuine effort to make art, the feelings will never get to the end product.
November 14, 2025 @ 10:02 am
Without any degree of talent that makes someone a poser. There are boundaries to what is “real” music. Not everyone has to be a virtuoso – one can even be the true definition of a ‘bedroom player’ but it still takes a degree of work on one’s own part.
The other side of not having talent but still attempting to be an artist is anti-art; it’s subversive art like Noise music or GG Allin.
Having a AI software do everything for you is worse than the two definitions I listed above.
November 13, 2025 @ 2:57 pm
I feel like this is just the beginning of a particularly nefarious plot by music industry power players. The soulless executives strategy is probably to gradually throw out some AI slop, artificially pump numbers to get on the chart, and the general public will consume the product because its “popular”. This conumdrum will reveal a lot about how hollow, greedy, and consumerist much of modern society has become (if it wasn’t already apparent). I do have some hope that strong communities will form between people that like and support HUMAN created music as much as I do.
November 13, 2025 @ 4:10 pm
The particular songs topping the Digital Sales Chart were made by rogue actors who are just trying to exploit loopholes in the system to bilk the public and the expense of actual creators. But my guess is Billboard does not want to remove them, because they see how major labels are investing millions in AI, understand that signed AI “artists” are already in the pipeline, and don’t want to undercut the industry they serve by sequestering this nefarious activity on separate charts. Many firms are already paying for streams and fudging numbers, so this doesn’t make these AI artists exceptional. And probably just like major labels, Billboard is salivating over the idea of being able to replace its workforce with AI, and shutter their HR department. So who are they to judge.
I do agree that no matter what happens, communities of human creators will persist. The question is will it be with the blessing of the conventional music industry, with its opposition, or in the ashes of it?
November 13, 2025 @ 3:25 pm
I suspect country music was targeted first because of the vacuity of pop country. It is a very small step from a song written by a committee to a song written by AI.
This highlights the importance of going to live events, purchasing a shirt, getting an album on vinyl if that’s your thing, and supporting your favorite artists in general.
November 13, 2025 @ 4:16 pm
I’d say about 90% of the comments I’ve seen on this topic on social media say something to the effect of, “It’s better than Morgan Wallen,” or “This is what country deserves for releasing slop for so many years.”
First, it’s not a very small step from a song composed by four songwriters, demoed, funded, recorded in a studio with a mix of live musicians and electronic production, and a song created from a prompt that’s spit out in three seconds. Maybe the quality is somewhat similar, but the existential crisis this creates for the entire music industry is hard to put into words.
And the people who will suffer first will not be Morgan Wallen. Artist like him are the ones who will be most insulated from whatever comes next. It’s the artist who is still in high school, or just learning guitar that would become the next Zach Bryan, Tyler Childers, or Billy Strings that will never even get that opportunity because there is no space for a human creator. This isn’t the future of music or even the present. That is what’s happened in music over the last year that will now be codified by this most recent AI activity.
November 13, 2025 @ 3:25 pm
I admit to being an Ella Langley fan, and I love “Choosin’ Texas,” but to think that she’s now the lone actual performer in Billboard’s top 3 is beyond scary.
November 13, 2025 @ 3:43 pm
I like Merle Haggard’s voice. I like The Strangers sound. I can ask Suno to make “Merle songs” till the cows come home. Who’s gonna compete with that?
What assumptions am I making that are wrong?
November 14, 2025 @ 9:42 am
LLM AI is derivative by definition. It can sound like Merle, it can sound like the Strangers, but it can’t create. It takes a note, and then it does some math to predict the next most likely note based on everything it has ever been exposed to. Then it takes those two notes, and it does some math to predict the next most likely note, etc. It cannot be anything other than derivative. Maybe catchy, maybe technically flawless, but devoid of emotion, devoid of meaning, absolutely the average of every artist it has ever heard. An AI would never try to follow Okie from Muskogee with Irma Jackson, even if it could manage to write both.
November 14, 2025 @ 10:03 am
Because it isn’t just Merle’s voice that is missing. It’s the passion and feeling that he put into the songs. It is lacking the heart and artistry of a human being. So no. You aren’t actually getting the spark of himself that Merle put into his work.
November 13, 2025 @ 7:18 pm
I’m taking a glass half full with this AI nonsense. There’s a lot of serious talent out there in the Americana and Bluegrass world and it will prevail.
November 13, 2025 @ 7:56 pm
Hey Trig,
You got TheFlow on your radar? It’s some new type of creator owned social media/music platform. I have nothing to do with this organization, I just know all my bluegrass and americana folks are chatting a lot about it. I think it’s supposed to launch soon? Anywho, just seeing if it’s on your radar.
November 14, 2025 @ 9:29 am
Have not heard of The Flow previously, but I will check it out. It’s an extremely heavy lift attempting to start a social media platform because you need en masse buy in from the public, but I wish them the best.
November 13, 2025 @ 8:09 pm
They sound like all of the rest of the junk that’s on those charts. Who even pays attention to those charts anyway?
November 13, 2025 @ 8:20 pm
There is a proper place and purpose for AI music, and if like me you subscribe to “Obscurest Vinyl”, you know just what that is.
November 13, 2025 @ 8:45 pm
Drake Milligan is the best thing in country music. This album “Tumbleweed” gives you everything…a brilliant tribute to the classic country artists with a Milligan twist !! 🔥❤️ We’re loving it !!!🎉
November 14, 2025 @ 4:05 am
This all sucks, but at least the name Cain Walker is hilarious. If they were to release a song called Walking Cane, I’d have to listen.
November 14, 2025 @ 4:43 am
I hate to say this, but isnt this Nashvilles Chickens coming home to roost? At least with chartable country, youre talking about an industry that favors tight controls over what music sounds like, what acceptable content is, what a superstar looks like etc. that you dont see in other genre industries except for maybe when Max Martin wrote every pop song and boy band song or the Brill Building way back in the day.
And yes, this website does an amazing job at highlighting those artists that have broken that mold (thank you, by the way) but very few of them are like Zach Bryan and Tyler Childers who control their own music AND are successful. And most of those guys do their recording far away from Nashville anyways, which has been true for decades… the more independent of a thinker/recorder you are, the faster you get out of dodge (Nashville) and instead go to Austin or Bakersfield or wherever you arent under strict conservative controls or like the Dixie Chicks just leave the genre altogether. So what you have left in the city that tries to control amd generate the hits is an attempt to standardize the message, the music, the lyrics and the image of the hunky cowboy (whose never lived a day like colter wall in his life) singing it for country radio (which, basically was Jason Isbells point about Jason Aldean and “Try that in a small town”).
When you have all of these parameters and reset controls built into your acceptable sound, and creativity isnt really one of them, it becomes the lowest hanging fruit for AI to replicate. Honestly, im not even sure the Nashville machine cares as long as what AI produces advances its agenda.
Anyways I appreciate this site both bringing the attention to AI, but also pointing us in the direction of country artists who cant as easily be replicated by chat gpt… keep it up
November 14, 2025 @ 4:51 am
I just bought tickets to see Breaking Rust at the Algorythm Festival. Cain Walker is opening!
November 14, 2025 @ 9:48 am
Reminds me of the old Carol Burnett skit – Raisin’ Cain.
Or was it, Raisin’ Cane … i forget how they spelled it.
November 14, 2025 @ 6:12 am
This is similar to what I said in a comment a couple of days ago – Youtube full of these songs with AI cover art and generic names. Cain Walker might have been one for sure. When I tried to google these artists I could find absolutely nothing to indicate these were real people (after all, people do use AI for cover art sometimes). What scares me is when the AI is so good that I can’t tell; it was the AI art that tipped me off initially because it was on all of them that popped up in my queue not just a couple. Then the fact that none of the names were familiar at all because I do follow music more than the average person. That’s why I read Saving Country Music!
November 14, 2025 @ 8:04 am
YouTube is the epicenter to all of this because it’s so easy and free to upload a video. There are at least some hoops to jump through with DSPs.
November 14, 2025 @ 6:35 am
I don’t worry about AI-generated stuff. I pay zero attention to any charts (especially Billboard’s) and I use this site as a primary source of information on country music new and old. Radio has been useless for a really long time. Spotify keeps trying to push certain artists into my streams, but I look for what I want. I trust the opinions of my like-minded friends regarding any music, and there are a few sites out there that still offer some decent suggestions.
As long as Trig doesn’t morph into something out of “I, Robot,” I figure I’m safe from the drones.
November 14, 2025 @ 7:43 am
It’s really gross how AI has infiltrated music. When a song is explicit, there’s an “E” next to it. Too bad we can’t something like “AI” next to all these fake tracks, the people behind this are dishonest.
November 14, 2025 @ 8:34 am
I am a local and regional artist (Northwest USA). I play various genres of music and originals and do about 60 gigs a year. For years I’ve mostly listened to local and regional artists.but I appreciate SCM for clueing me into what I’m else is out there. At 70 y.o. I play slot of bluegrass (I’ve seen Colby Acuff perform locally as a youngster) and play all the bluegrass instruments (guitar, mandolin, banjo, Dobro, fiddle). The best way to counter AI garbage is to support LIVE LOCAL music!
November 14, 2025 @ 11:07 am
AI is sadly here to stay and the number of chart entries is going to increase dramatically. The investment required is significantly less than the real thing and the potential for profit is big. The charts have lost much of their relevance in recent years as has radio. I can only see that changing for the worse.
November 14, 2025 @ 7:39 pm
Well maybe this will drive people back to buying actual albums in local record shops. I am seeing this trend SLIGHTLY in my area.
And if it is happening in country lord know it is happening in all genres some harder to root out like hiphop or EDM.
November 15, 2025 @ 9:12 am
Vinyl sales continue to increase year over year. This is a positive sign, and could be an indemnity against AI.
November 15, 2025 @ 12:11 pm
Big Chance for CD and LP sale! Greetings from Switzerland!
November 15, 2025 @ 1:39 pm
Just so you know, you were quoted by NBC News regarding Breaking Rust, and that article ended up on the front page of Yahoo.
https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/music/articles/mysterious-stranger-rode-town-topped-100000923.html
November 15, 2025 @ 2:25 pm
Thanks for the link. I was also interviewed by TIME Magazine about this:
https://time.com/7333738/ai-country-song-breaking-rust-walk-my/
Someone commented above that they haven’t really seen any press coverage for it. That can be the case depending on where you get your news, but I would say it was easily the biggest story in music last week.
November 16, 2025 @ 9:26 am
The fear of AI music is overrated and will eventually be great for music for one simple reason. Humans adapt. There is a reason why “genres” and “sub genres” of the best music in history have tended to originate out of localized geographic regions. Competition makes people better. It’s a fact of life in everything, music or otherwise. I have no doubt that humans, with their creative spark, will rise to the challenge and music will actually become good again.
November 16, 2025 @ 5:38 pm
How I see it: Nothing of any consequence will happen until this truly starts to impact pop or hip hop.
Notice how it seems to have used country as a test, since country was utterly ineffective in its fighting off Little Nas X, Beyoncé or other interolopers – because of the usual PC fears of gatekerping, racism, canceling and all of that. Face it, country is no financial behemoth and rock’n-roll, jazz and other forms are expendable as well. Complacency too, with some iffy new talent clouding the waters too.
This will change only if (a) big breakout AI tune(s) cut(s) adjacently into territory (critically, artistically or intellectual property wise via image/style imitation perhaps) of let’s say Beyoncé (in her home turf of R&B) or Taylor Swift (pop). Taylor’s handlers will sue to protect the investments. Jay’s blood will boil citing appropriation, racism and boycotting calls. Their voices will be heard, since both of them have financial clout greatly surpassing record companies and the entertainment industry in general – rendering them moot in the argument. Those two will be able to actually accomplish this from a pure intellectual property standpoint, by virtue of their financial power- and the resources they will he able to pull in.
The record companies will have mixed results but will profit either way.
The fans? Well, we all see how boycotts work (and fail). We all see how Big Fat Butt the Plug made inroads and how willing they will accept “out of genre singers” sob stories because they make a good “coutry” song. (As castigate us for our “discriminating” tastes)We still aren’t far removed yet from bro, boyfriend and hick hop either.
The tragedy is that so many of the gifted up and comers will have to work harder and settle for niche status more because of this. And true fans, whether old timers or yungins’ looking for a tangible history to touch will have challenges finding the needles in the haystack.
November 18, 2025 @ 11:56 am
https://www.boston.com/news/business/2025/11/18/ai-generated-country-hit-tops-billboard-chart-using-tech-built-in-massachusetts/?p1=hp_secondary
December 5, 2025 @ 4:14 pm
Maybe if the “country music” radio stations would play actual country music, instead of the bullshit pop they’ve been pushing down out throats for 10+ years, this AI stuff wouldn’t be a thing.
Maybe listen to people and play real fuckin music from real fuckin artists and maybe, just maybe, we wouldn’t have to resort to making ‘our own’ music with AI.
This isn’t a catastrophe, its a fuckin message to the Holywood influenced boy-band “country” music industry that we’re tired of the bullshit and want real fuckin music.
Y’all can either listen to us and change, or die on the vine. Choice is your’s.