The Ballad of Charley Crockett and Satanic Band Twin Temple

You can tell it’s a slow news week when it’s a nothing burger with cheese like this that creates the biggest nontroversy in all of music. Editors have been approving multiple stories about Charley Crockett ditching one of his openers, and influencers are feeling like they must chime in on the hot topic. And despite the silliness of this entire situation, it has turned into something that probably is worth commenting on, if only due to the secondary fallout that has created some unfortunate misconceptions and collateral damage.
For those who are unaware, earlier this week the supposed “Satanic” doo-wop band Twin Temple took to social media to complain they’d been kicked off the Charley Crockett tour due to their demonic ties. They previously had been scheduled to open shows for Crockett on July 14th and July 18th.
“Today we were informed that Charley Crockett has decided to remove Twin Temple from his upcoming shows next week due to our Satanic imagery,” the duo said in a statement. “Unfortunately, that means we will not be able to perform for you next week as planned. We are really disappointed as we were looking forward to getting back out and seeing you, and also what it means as far as bringing different types of people and music lovers together. We are sorry to everyone who was planning to see us. We’re grateful for your support, not only of Twin Temple, but more importantly of artistic freedom. HAIL SATAN! 93/93″
Charley Crockett responded about a day later with a picture of Johnny Cash standing in front of a cross and the caption, “If they did it to Jesus, imagine what they’ll do to you.” Subsequently, he’s responded even more as he seems to be the one getting the brunt of the backlash, not the husband and wife due who profess they’re advocates for sacrificing children to Satan, and literally get audiences to pledge their allegiance to Satan at shows.
For the record, Crockett has never really professed any religious leanings previously. But you don’t necessarily have to be a hardcore Christian to be turned off by Satanism. He’s also most certainly not “a MAGA country star” as many online trolls are attacking him for being.
First and foremost, despite the imagery and the cosplay marketing, let’s establish that Twin Temple is not an actual “Satanic” band. The true Satanists in society would never come out and say such in public, beyond the people who promote things like the Satanic Church. The actual Satanists are the oligarchs that run tech/AI companies, sitting politicians in positions of power, business titans and top intellectuals that are part of secret societies that profess being Christian on the surface, but otherwise participate in Jeffrey Epstein-style social circles.
Actual Satanism is not just being “anti Christian.” To be an actual Satanist, you first have to believe in God, believe in The Bible, believe Jesus is the Lord and Savior, and then believe that Lucifer is a fallen angel that you then worship for worldly gain and pleasure. Any true Satanist would not take to social media to complain about getting kicked off a tour, or say it’s their mission to bring “different types of people and music lovers together.” That’s some pansy shit to an actual Satanist.
Of course husband and wife Alexandra and Zachary James of Twin Temple are not “Satanists,” even if they think they are. They’re art class dorks from Los Angeles who try to eat a socially conscious diet and have a cat named Salem. They literally try to use the banner of Satanism to “battle against sexism,” when actual Satanism professes the slavish servitude of all flesh. Their “Satanism” is equivalent to a 14-year-old boy throwing eggs at the bedroom window of a girl he likes before smoking a joint with his friends behind the local Dollar General.
The music of Twin Temple is simply a form of performance art. For all the folks who want to accuse Charley Crockett of being a cosplay cowboy, Twin Temple are cosplay Satanists of the highest order, unless they’re actually sacrificing babies to Satan, and then they should be prosecuted for infanticide.
For the record, Saving Country Music had heard Twin Temple’s music in the past, and was familiar with the band before the recent imbroglio. As an outlet that covers Gothic roots music, they came onto the radar via suggestions from readers. The most concise way to describe the band is doo-wop with Satanic lyricism that tries to draw contrast between the innocent ’50s era and demonic ideas.
As a musical project, Twin Temple is good at what they do. Their recording technique to make their songs sound like they’re from the ’50s is impressive, and Zachary James is a good guitar player and composer. But if you listen to one or two of the band’s songs, you’ve pretty much heard them all. There’s a very “one note” aspect to the music since most all the songs work the same.
Should the fact that they’re not actual “Satanists” mean that Charley Crockett is being too uptight? No. It’s a weird band that never should have been booked opening for Charley Crockett anyway. Twin Temple works better on the punk and metal circuit, which is where they commonly perform. But this leads us to the actual problem with this whole thing.
Right now, the Charley Crockett camp is kind of a mess. Crockett getting stopped at the Canadian border and not being able to fulfill his tour there felt like something that could have been resolved beforehand. His potential improper vetting of Island Records and/or his contract that he later complained about also seems like an unforced error for an independent artist. He released the album Clovis as an act of protest against Island, but in a way that put him in legal jeopardy and had the album taken down due to violating his Island contract.
These unforced errors on Charley Crockett’s part that have become distractions to what’s supposed to be the primary focus: the music. And it’s a shame since Crockett’s current album Clovis might be his best.
Then there’s the dozen plus managers Crockett’s run through over the last few years, his unnecessary veering into politics that have made an already polarizing performer even more polarizing. Sure, if he wants to speak out on specific issues, he should have the right and the latitude to do so. But one of his statements about the firing of Twin Temple started off “F–K Trump,” though in part, this was to fend off online trolls that were basically painting him as an equivalent to Jason Aldean.
Why isn’t Charley Crockett hand selecting his openers for every one of his shows, and fully knowledgeable of them? He’s had some great openers in the past, and his career very much started opening for the Turnpike Troubadours and others. Twin Temple should have never been booked in the first place, and if someone else did it and put Crockett in this precarious position, they should have to answer for it too. But ultimately, Charley should be in charge of these decisions.
Nonetheless, the folks trying to couch Twin Temple as victims are being a bit over-the-top too. Jack White sent the whole issue into the stratosphere when he piped up and offered to put Twin Temple on the bill of his September 29th show in L.A at the Palladium. Now all of a sudden these supposed Satanists and their fans are crying about persecution? That’s in part because they’ve co-opted Satanism into some weird progressive political stance that actual Satanism doesn’t actually profess.
This whole thing just feels incredibly stupid. Yes, Crockett should have avoided this issue by properly vetting Twin Temple. But Twin Temple trying to pander for sympathy, and getting it from the “they deserve artistic freedom” crowd and claiming Crockett’s MAGA are just as insufferable. Yeah, you start saying things like “Satan Loves All The Children” in the post Epstein Files world, and people are smart to distance.
Nonetheless, this has been the best publicity boost Twin Temple and their music could ever ask for—much better than opening for Crockett, which was a poor pairing anyway—while Crockett will recover just like he does from all of these silly and mild controversies.
If there’s anything this episode should underscore for everyone, it’s how important choosing the right openers is. So often it’s left to booking agents that seem to have no clue how to curate a good night of music, or is subject to industry politics where labels or managers have some band they need to pay off, or are trying to push on a certain market.
Charley Crockett was right to recognize Twin Temple wouldn’t be a good opener for him. He was wrong to rubber stamp them in the first place.
Now, let’s all move on to more important matters.
– – – – – – – –
If you found this article valuable, consider leaving Saving Country Music A TIP.

July 11, 2026 @ 7:14 am
You make a really good point on asking the question why was this group ever booked as opener? With all the recent errors, if he has a manager, he needs a new one! A bizarre year or so for Crockett who puts out great music and from what I have read puts on a great show. He is right to dispense with this opener who should never have been booked in the first place.
July 11, 2026 @ 12:13 pm
I agree that they weren’t a good fit. I love outlaw country And black metal and everything in between. One note, it appears SCM doesn’t really understand satanism. Most satanist are non-theistic satanists, which is all South individual freedom and standing up the tyranny of Christian hypocrisy. Most ideas of what “real” satanism is stem from the satanic panic of the 1980s, which was a lie made up by the same evangelical flim flam men who exploit rural America today.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:30 pm
How the hell (no pun intended) did Trigger completely miss the whole thing where modern Satanism exists (it’s fucking amazing, it exists mostly to enforce the first amendment you morons, but they also feed the homeless and create community projects of all kinds. They have kids programs to provide an alternative to Christian after school programs. I would have fucking loved it in fourth grade as a smartass child atheist).
Yes, it’s tongue in cheek but also it’s one of those “be good without God” projects that some people who can’t create their own community outside of spirituality find helpful.
The twin Temple folks are just performance art. They’re not really part of that movement as far as I know. It’s just a joke kind of like trigger describes.
Seriously though, there’s a really great book about modern Satanism by a theology professor at some University in Texas that tries to address whether or not this silly movement is starting to turn into an actual spiritual movement in the same vein as a new age stuff.
There’s a bunch of ways to do community and spirituality and they seem to be finding their way from one to the other in addition to doing their first amendment activities. I’ll be watching carefully because I’m nervous about well-intentioned things becoming cults but currently it’s not.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:35 pm
Forgot to mention the book title. Speak Of The Devil by Joseph Laycock. He also has one about the Satanic Panic of the 80’s and how it led to a moral Panic about Dungeons and Dragons. Having gotten in trouble at church camp for liking D&D during that exact time period, and generally living through that mess, I found both books fantastic.
July 11, 2026 @ 7:22 am
Charley Crockett has been reading the DJT playbook. “Keep them thumbing their phones” and let’s see how they react.
100% set up
TT has had more clicks in a week than they had before this even started, and CC has received a ton too
Now, a real good vs evil show would be the Strays and TT
July 11, 2026 @ 7:32 am
This has been a huge boon for Twin Temple. I strongly disagree this is working out for Charley Crockett. The reason he keeps posting about it is because he’s in major damage control mode.
The problem here for Crockett is he’s previously come out criticizing Trump, yet the attacks he’s receiving from people defending Twin Temple is that he’s a MAGA country star. This is creating a crossfire where Crockett has no allies and he’s getting incoming from both sides of the political binary.
By the way, the idea that “Satanism” is a bastion for battling against sexism, racism, and the climate crisis couldn’t be a more stupid, asinine, ludicrous assertion from aggressive idiots who just want to come across as edgy with no actual knowledge of religion whatsoever.
July 11, 2026 @ 8:11 am
I love Charley’s music and will keep listening, but this is all really stupid. I agree that it’s entirely an error on his part, and while he’s completely within his right to drop an opener, it’s painfully obvious he should have never booked them in the first place because of their performance incompatibility. And even then, he could have handled the fallout in a polite post where he took some responsibility for not doing due diligence, apologized to the band and their fans, and it would have been done.
Instead he’s turning this into a weird crusade and almost making it seem like he was tricked into this by Old Scratch himself, and worse, that Twin Temple is actually in the wrong for exercising their artistic and religious freedom. Not a good look, especially for an outlaw country artist. And especially for an outlaw country artist who has access to Spotify and who could have looked up any of their songs beforehand lol
Anyway, hopefully Charley hires a PR person who can tell him when to log off and give advice on how to take very simple steps to avoid blowing situations up. And glad to see Twin Temple landing on their feet.
July 11, 2026 @ 8:37 am
“Old Scratch” is good, I had to look that up.
But between this and the record label bit, Charlie does come off like he’s getting pretty big for his (already quite big) britches. Likes to have his cake and eat it too, that sort of thing. He should run for president!
July 11, 2026 @ 10:36 am
“he could have handled the fallout in a polite post where he took some responsibility for not doing due diligence, apologized to the band and their fans, and it would have been done.”
“Not a good look, especially for an outlaw country artist.”
I agree Charley could have handled this better with his statements. He put himself in a pair of finger cuffs, and now the harder he tries to wrestle free, the worse it gets.
That said, I do have some sympathy for him, because the online mob came after him after the Twin Temple post. Otherwise, I don’t think Crockett would have addressed it at all. He had people coming for him, saying he was a dumb country hick, and he had an emotional reaction. His response was kind of “Outlaw,” though I agree, he just fueled the fire instead of dousing it.
What’s also unreasonable is Twin Temple fans thinking they would have gone over well at a Charley Crockett show. It would have been terrible for them, and Charley Crockett.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:59 am
Look, I don’t know anything about this band, or really care that much to. But to me the whole “satanism” thing sounds like a counterpoint to so-called Christians who only love themselves and their money. Trying to tie it back to biblical satanism is really besides the point.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:05 pm
“Trying to tie it back to biblical satanism is really besides the point.”
Without The Bible and Christianity, you don’t have Satanism. The word “Satan,” the imagery, the ritual, it’s all derived from The Bible and Christianity. You can be anti-Christian or an atheist without being a Satanist. You cannot have Satanism without Christianity. That’s just a fact.
July 11, 2026 @ 6:11 pm
Yeah, you can’t have Satanists without taking the name from the Bible, but that doesn’t mean that modern satanists are worshipping the devil and trying to bring about the end times. Most modern satanists are like the Satanic Temple – non-theistic, holding up Satan as a symbol of being skeptical of authority, thinking for yourself, and standing up for the underdog. They are using the term that the Christians came up with to define themselves, but they do not believe in any aspects of Christian belief.
When I say performative Christians, I mean those who miss stuff like “Beware of practicing your righteousness before other people in order to be seen by them, for then you will have no reward from your Father who is in heaven”
July 11, 2026 @ 6:33 pm
Satan is a Hebrew word for adversary or accuser, hence why in the Bible the character of Satan, such as in the book of Job, is more of a prosecutor role than an antagonistic character. Not saying we wouldn’t have satanism without the Bible, but the Bible can’t even decide what a Satan is, much less for any sort of philosophy to be birthed from it.
July 11, 2026 @ 7:20 pm
Twin Temple plays shows in Nudie-style suits with upside down crosses on the shoulders and back. They start each show with a Satanic ritual at an alter that is flanked by two upside down crosses. The cross is a sign of the crucifixion of Christ in the Gospel books of the New Testament, which is considered the heart of modern Christianity. The power of the symbolism is derived from the power that the cross has in the Christian faith.
You can see the upside down crosses here:
https://youtu.be/ToR2V4WLdAw?si=EnD-e–VJPOPzt11&t=13
For the record, this symbolism is different than the pentagram used by the Church of Satan and other organizations.
You don’t have the symbolism Twin Temple uses without the foundation of the Christian doctrine.
July 12, 2026 @ 9:57 am
The Church of Satan has been around for 60 years, mate – it and the Satanic Temple (a free speech group that’s been around for 15 years) are rather obviously what Twin Temple are talking up.
Very much a “No gods, no masters” vibe.
July 12, 2026 @ 11:02 am
And the Pagan and Witchcraft traditions that morphed into actual Satanism have been around for thousands of years.
I never mentioned the Church of Satan or the Temple of Satan. I said “Satanism.” You’re the ones conflating things.
Also, the HUGE point some are missing is that the reason I drew this comparison and said Twin Temple were NOT Satanists was to explain this contrast to a country audience. In the effort for people to falsely undermine my position, they’re completely missing the point of it.
July 12, 2026 @ 8:47 am
Yeah it’s funny cuz the Strays would be “good” but they are actually terrible racist people. Charley has lost the plot and his mind with social media. dude needs to throw away his phone
July 12, 2026 @ 10:16 am
“…terribly racist people…”
Sure they. 😂
July 11, 2026 @ 7:28 am
A Hell of a situation.
July 11, 2026 @ 7:28 am
I’ll say this: I appreciate Crockett introducing me to Twin Temple. I otherwise never would have heard of them, and they are (as the kids say) a vibe.
Also, Trig, your description of “Satanists” is pretty uninformed and jaundiced, but beside the point anyway,
July 11, 2026 @ 7:39 am
My description of Satanists is not uninformed at all. Satanism has been co-opted just like Christianity to push whatever people want it to, including idiots who think it’s a stand-in for equality and climate justice like Twin Temple is trying to peddle. The only way an upside down cross has power is if you believe Jesus Christ was the Lord and Savior and was crucified on one.
July 11, 2026 @ 7:43 am
It has significant rhetorical power in a majority Christian polity, which is why the Church of Satan (the advocacy group, not weirdos who believe in a nonexistent entity) use it. That people get wrapped around the axle about depictions of Baphomet or whatever is the point.
I’m not a member of the CoS, for the record, but I appreciate from a pragmatic perspective the leveraging of the signaling function of religious iconography.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:19 pm
There are basically two types of Satanists, Laveyan and Theological. The first follow the teachings of Anton Lavey and use Satan as a symbol of anti-religion. They follow the Satanic Bible written by Anton (1969) and they are mostly pissed off atheists. They don’t believe God or Satan exist. TT likely falls into this group. The theological ones really do believe in Satan and they are evil AF. They are fortunately a much smaller group. Both are ridiculous in my opinion, but they are different.
If Charley approved them for the show he should have known better. Watch one music video on YouTube and you’ll know their schtick. Given the situation it is best he took them off the bill. Had they played the show the blowback likely would have been much worse.
July 11, 2026 @ 7:30 am
I was on the fence with Crockett for the past few years. He seems to be forcing his “coolness” and touts himself as the real deal which is a big turn off for me. It’s like giving yourself your own cool nickname. He spends the majority of his time on social media worshipping “outlaws” and talking about how real he is. The real ones dont do that. And, can we please acknowledge how fake his speech is? He is clearly putting on an act, moreover than any mainstream artist I can think of. As a native Texas, it is downright corny and almost offensive the way he charicaturizes himself.
The way he has been handling this was the final nail in the coffin for me as a fan. He’s showing that any class he has is influenced by his ego.
July 11, 2026 @ 7:32 am
When I first read about this, it crossed my mind that this was nothing more than a publicity stunt. Both acts got a ton of free press and even Jack White got in on the deal.
July 11, 2026 @ 7:03 pm
And of course, Jack will probably offer to produce TT’s next project, thereby adding to the brouhaha.
I had to go back and look up some of my old guitar magazines, and I found it. The February 2006 Guitar World.
Jack White and Jimmy Page on the cover.
Title? “The Art Of Playing The Devil’s Music”.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:06 pm
Satanic imagery in rock ‘n’ roll goes all the way back to the blues. I cannot believe all the pearl-clutching.
July 12, 2026 @ 11:07 am
“Rock is the devil’s music. You can’t convince me that it isn’t…I believe rock’n’roll is dangerous…I fear that we’re heralding something even darker than ourselves…”
David Bowie, “Ground Control To Davy Jones”, Rolling Stone, February 12, 1976.
July 11, 2026 @ 7:37 am
I don’t know which adjective — deranged or moronic — applies better here, but thanks in either case for keeping your head in your commentary on this inglorious moment. I just hope I haven’t lost treasured IQ points in my exposure to this “controversy.”
July 11, 2026 @ 8:18 am
Chris Knight after reading this SCM article: “Amateurs”
July 11, 2026 @ 8:19 am
Why Charley didn’t vet his openers better is beyond me. It takes exactly 2 seconds of research to figure out what Twin Temples is about. They are either a really bad fart joke or actually into some really dark stuff. According to their socials they sell vinyl with actual blood in it which is just insane to me.
I love the production of their records but songs like “Let’s Have a Satanic Orgy” have no place in civilized society. I’m not offended by their music, but they might as well be writing songs called “Let’s all Eat Chicken Poop and Die.” It’s not good art.
Madeleine L’Engle says “Bad art is bad religion no matter how pious the subject.” I’d say Twin Temples are the flip side of that coin. Charley was wrong to book them without proper vetting and right to cancel their performances.
July 11, 2026 @ 8:40 am
Conrad, “They sell vinyl with actual blood in it” is a schtick that KISS invented when they put literally 1 drop of blood in the ink of their comic book release. We laughed!!! Don’t read too much into it buddy. The Twin Temple kids are about as scary as a basket full of puppies. It’s entertainment, pure and simple. These days there is no excuse for any artist to let anyone open for them that doesn’t belong there or offends people, and we all know thousands of artists who are more deserving to have this slot.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:39 am
Understood. I’ve seen other artists do the same thing, and I’m not offended by any of this. There’s gotta be a line somewhere, and I draw mine just north of blood for sale in anything other than filet mignon.
July 11, 2026 @ 8:25 am
The criticism of TT being “one note” and clearly an act is interesting because I think you could say the same of Charlie Crockett. In spite (or perhaps because of) his (over)abundance of recorded music it all kind of sounds the same to me. Frankly I think he relies on quantity to try to distract from the relative death of quality.
I utterly revere Jack White on account of the first 4 White Stripes albums. That band could also be called “one note” but what a great note it was! His solo stuff I could never listen to until this last one (“Frozen Charlotte” just released last Friday). I listened to the whole thing, not because it’s particularly good but because there isn’t any other good mainstream rock music being made in 2026.
But as far as this as a news story: how can you not love it?! Cowboys and bluesmen, icons and unknowns, conservatives and liberals, and of course, Satanic doo-wop — it’s like some weird indie music pulp novel tabloid! Somebody get Danhausen involved in this.
July 11, 2026 @ 8:30 am
I DO NOT SUPPORT THIS SATANIC BLACK MAGIC SICK SHIT THANK YOU
July 11, 2026 @ 8:42 am
But, have no doubt.
Trig does.
And, he has for quite some time.
He even practices it.
Doesn’t keep me from praying for him
July 11, 2026 @ 10:38 am
Yes, I’m a Satanist. Yet here you are, still supporting me by clicking on my articles, and engaging them with comments, which helps boost the signal. You know how many other options you have for reading in the internet? Yet you continue to support someone you claim is reprehensible. Joke’s on you, Di.
July 12, 2026 @ 5:09 am
Are you being sarcastic or you really a satanist .?
I think I better stay off this site
July 12, 2026 @ 7:03 am
I was probably being sarcastic.
It’s going to be difficult for me to stay off this site if it’s going to continue to exist.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:03 am
Aw, he must be devastated now.
I might be harsh and cynical at times, and Trigger sure doesn’t hold back in some of his replies to my comments, but the fact that he let my – and yours – comments through, tells me that he is a fair guy, giving us a lot of slack.
So, yeah, he’s probably a vile satanist, but he’s a better human than you.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:59 am
Kyle’s favorite song is Friend of the Devil, so…
July 11, 2026 @ 1:06 pm
This is true 🙂
July 11, 2026 @ 8:48 am
He said he was doing a favor for a friend and since Shooter is a fan of TT it may have been Shooter that he was doing the favor for. Either way I honestly can’t believe this got so blown up! TT fans and even folks that never heard of them before were on a massive hate hail satan rampage on social media. There was even a point when Sierra Ferrell chimed in and was full on verbally attacked! All in the name of satan-this shit cray!
July 11, 2026 @ 9:11 am
I think what’s important for all of us to take a step back and understand is that even though this seems to be a fight over religion, it’s actually a fight over politics. Twin Temple has used “Satanism” as a stand-in for their left-leaning ideology, and this appeals to people who are decidedly non-religious. So when they heard a country artist cancelled them, they immediately made it political. Ironically, Charley Crockett’s politics probably align more with Twin Temple than they do your average mainstream country star. Same with Sierra Ferrell. So by coming after them, they’re undermining their own interests. It’s also this political fervor that is fueling the passion with which they’re undermining these otherwise progressive country artists.
For the record, Sierra Ferrell is a Christian and has professed that publicly. Charley Crockett never has, and really even hasn’t through this whole situation. He’s just stood up against the idea of “Satanism.”
A lot of wild-eyed assumptions being drawn by Twin Temple fans, and others that got sucked into the fray thinking they’re battling “MAGA.”
July 11, 2026 @ 9:19 am
I agree with all of what you just said 100%
July 11, 2026 @ 11:03 am
This is a religious issue. Despite the horrors continuously being inflicted on our society by the religious minded amongst us, I, as a nonbeliever would not fire a gospel or Christian rock act from a tour if I had already booked them. This is pure discrimination, coming from people so naive and childlike that they believe in something as ridiculous as Satan or genuine satanists. It’s only political in the sense of the right being historically conservative in their political views. I’ve seen no leftist ideology from anyone, Jack White is doing right by TT in what is supposed to be a pluralistic society. I guess Charley missed the memo. He ain’t no Outlaw, kissin Christian ass like this.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:28 am
“I’ve seen no leftist ideology from anyone.”
An integral part of the Twin Temple stage show is to compel the audience to hold their hands out in devil horns, and pledge their allegiance to Satan. I spoke about this in the article, and hyperlinked to a video of them doing this very thing. As part of that pledge they say, quote, “Satan, send us the very flames of hell so we may burn down sexism, so that we may burn down racism.” They go on from there.
VIDEO:
https://youtu.be/ToR2V4WLdAw?si=1vQXtskIXAZSMO4M&t=124
As I said explicitly in the article, I don’t think Twin Temple are actual “Satanists.” As I have also said multiple times now, people have co-opted Christianity to push things the religion doesn’t stand for, just like Twin Temple has done in their art project.
Not wanting someone to come out on your stage an make your fans pledge their allegiance to Satan is not “kissing Christian ass.” It is the most sane, normal position for most any human to take.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:14 pm
Charlie Crockett did not say that he had a problem with the political aspect of their show, he has stated over and over again that it is Satansts that he has a problem with. So again, how is this a political issue when he explicitly states his problem with them is their endorsement of satanism?which he expresses using religious imagery and language.
It’s religious, full stop.
And you didn’t even attempt to answer my central question, which is how is this not discrimination? The story of Abraham and Isaac is pure evil, so why shouldn’t a nonbeliever kick a Christian musician off a tour once booked? After all, Christians have done a lot more damage to our society than any Satanists.
You also keep mentioning these “Real Satanist’s” as if this is a force of any size or reality in the United States. It’s not real.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:38 pm
Charley Crockett*
You’re missing my point, JBird. The reason this very small issue turned into a massive internet furor is due to the political nature of this issue. I was in arrears about 24-36 hours publishing this article. The reason for that is because I took my time, scanned through every internet and social media thread I could find to understand this issue. What I found was one comment after another declaring Charley Crockett “MAGA.” I saw other comments saying he was a “fascist” and a “Nazi,” and many equating him to country artists like Jason Aldean and Morgan Wallen, all of which are categorically false.
Why did Charley Crockett start off his second social post about this with “Fuck Trump”? Because that was the prevailing criticism coming at him, that he was a Trump supporter.
Here it is:
https://www.facebook.com/photo?fbid=1562567175238945&set=a.270892877739721
So yes, politics is very much a player in this.
Charley Crockett made a mistake booking Twin Temple in the first place. I was very expressive about that in this article. Ultimately, this is on Charley Crockett. But it was 100% the right decision, not just for Crockett, but for Twin Temple. You cannot open a country show with a Satanic Ritual where you compel the audience to pledge allegiance to Satan. A lot of folks are acting like they put a pentagram on a T-shirt, and Charley freaked out. No, it’s beyond all.
And quit trying to deflect by bringing up Christian atrocities. We all know that history, and how terrible it is. You can be against that, and posting symbolic sacrificing of babies on the internet.
July 11, 2026 @ 4:31 pm
Wait a minute. Sexism and racism are partisan? Please explain how being anti sexist and anti racist are liberal values.
July 11, 2026 @ 5:00 pm
Please explain to me how they’re Satanic values.
Let’s not get in the weeds here. Go to any social media thread on this issue and it will be dominated with people attacking Charley Crockett for being MAGA. The political quotient was injected into this issue and made it explode. That’s my point.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:18 am
This entire article feels like you don’t understand satanism at all. Nobody who describes themselves as such actually believes in the fucking devil nor do they actually perform rituals. It is supposed to be about self empowerment and to be kind to others. You call them theatre dorks I call you clueless
July 11, 2026 @ 12:01 pm
I saw a clip where they said they perform satanic rituals not only on stage but also at home and there is even a clip where they have a fake baby doll they are sacrificing to satan or some shit and if that’s not enough they also perform Baptisms for cash at shows… They really do seem like theater dorks tbh
July 11, 2026 @ 1:09 pm
“there is even a clip where they have a fake baby doll they are sacrificing to satan”
Yeah, but there’s nothing to see here! The only possible way you can be against this band opening for you on tour is if you’re an uptight bigot. Let’s cancel Charley Crockett!
July 11, 2026 @ 12:58 pm
“Nobody who describes themselves as such actually believes in the fucking devil nor do they actually perform rituals.”
7th paragraph of the article, “Of course husband and wife Alexandra and Zachary James of Twin Temple are not “Satanists,”
That said, Twin Temple opens their show with a Satanic ritual. They call it a ritual. They call their show a ritual. They hold swords and have a Satanic altar. The woman holds two fingers up, with three pointed below, which is the anti-pontiff hand gesture. They chime a bell which is part of the Satanic ritual. Then they compel the audience to all hold out devil horns and pledge their allegiance to Satan.
You can see it here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ToR2V4WLdAw
All that said, I agree, these people are not actual Satanists. Actual Satanists do their business in the shadows. That is part of the Satanic code.
I believe Charley Crockett caught wind of this band, probably while in LA, heard the music and determined it was roots-oriented enough, and rubber stamped booking them on a tour. Then someone saw them on a show poster, maybe a manager or a booking agent got an email, showed them the ritual that they start their show with, and smartly, the whole thing was 86’d. Because if had not been, the blowback would be x10 if Twin Temple had actually taken the stage at a Charley Crockett show. The reason Charley Crockett acted like he did in response is because people came at him as a White Christian Nationalist Trump-supporting MAGA country hick, and he took offense.
July 11, 2026 @ 4:43 pm
“…and smartly, the whole thing was 86’d. Because if had not been, the blowback would be x10 if Twin Temple had actually taken the stage at a Charley Crockett show.”
I agree. There’s controversy now, but they headed off something much worse.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:40 am
Scooter Jennings is the kiss of death.
July 11, 2026 @ 8:49 am
This whole thing is so goofy and weird, and has the air of a limp-wristed slap fight between a mime and a circus clown. Just a couple goofballs in costume fighting – about what exactly? Jesus vs. the devil? Gimme a break.
I guess the most interesting thing we learned here is that Crockett doesn’t vet is openers – which is odd, considering what a torchbearer for “real deal” country music he claims to be.
July 11, 2026 @ 9:15 am
No sympathy for the devil here…
July 11, 2026 @ 9:25 am
It seems odd that whoever manages Charley and/or Charley himself wouldnt know who they were booking as the support act. Most gigs I go too the opening act has some sort of connection to the opening act. Maybe Charley had a satan inspired country record in the bag after Clovis and changed his mind (joking).
Among the comments people claim that Charley records too much material and that it sounds similar what ive heard of Clovis so far doesnt sound similar to what hes put out to me so far. and doesnt anyone have a signature sound anyway whether its old crow medicine show , turnpike troubadours or whoever ?
July 11, 2026 @ 9:38 am
Just have to say I like almost all you writing Trigger, but this writing made me smile and was spot on about hipster types and 14 year old mentality adults that use things like Satanism or Anarchy as their brand to pretend to be different. Best article I’ve read anywhere in a long while. Hail Trigger! Ha!
July 11, 2026 @ 9:39 am
…some make it into cmhof with a devil woman, others probably not.
July 11, 2026 @ 9:46 am
El Paso. That’s all he needed.
July 11, 2026 @ 9:44 am
Good I’m glad he did it. And it’s a win win, big boost for he cringey Satanist band and those who are impressed by such things, meanwhile the rest of CC’s audience doesn’t have to sit through the edgelord performance.
As much as they like to pretend it’s about humanism, trolling is what it really is. Anyone out of their teens should be able to figure that out
July 11, 2026 @ 9:48 am
Wouldn’t it be a hoot if this was all a hoax? Charley wanting to get extra publicity for the Twin Temple group. I’m pretty sure in the last few days the Temple has more than doubled their online listens.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:39 am
If it’s a hoax, it’s one Charley Crockett is paying out the nose for.
July 11, 2026 @ 12:21 pm
Not really. It likely gave Crockett a big boost with Christians and conservatives.
“Not today, Satan,” is a cliche.often used by Christians to express faith.
That was Chucky’s target.
He already has all the leftists.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:16 am
A month or two back I commented, comparing the drama of following CC with the drama of dating can chasers…
My sincerest apologies to the barrel racers – I love yall 😂
July 11, 2026 @ 10:16 am
Here is the problem with all of this…Charley knew exactly who they were. He has liked posts from them in the last two years on Instagram and his wife still follows them on Instagram as of last night. They also attended a party with them along with Shooter and his wife in October. Those are facts. Something about this whole deal is just off.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:48 am
The level of buy-in to this controversy where you now have been scanning for “likes” and follows on Instagram and going after other artists like Sierra Ferrell really speaks to the unhinged, disproportionate nature with which it’s being handled.
I wouldn’t be surprised if Charley Crockett met Twin Temple at a Shooter party, thought they were kind of cool, scanned their music and heard that it sounded like retro rock, and when asked if they could open for him, said “sure.”
Having scanned through a lot of the social chatter and delving deeper into the band itself, to me the deal killer probably was the fact that it’s part of Twin Temple’s show to get the entire audience to pledge allegiance to Satan. That kind of feels like that crosses a pretty big line, and it’s something that would have gone over catastrophically for both Twin Temple, and Charley Crockett at a Charley Crockett show. And you have to dig down and extra layer to understand that’s part of their show, even if it’s part of their “anti-sexism, anti-racism” bit.
Charley Crockett does not come across as a particularly religious dude. But the pledge to Satan is particularly over-the-top. He did Twin Temple a MASSIVE favor by canceling their shows, both on the front end, and on the back end.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:09 am
What are you talking about? I hope the first part of your reply was worded poorly and not directed at me. I have not “scanned for likes” I came across it on Charleys reddit. I have never said a negative word about Sierra ever. I am a huge fan of hers. You need to edit that, I don’t appreciate being accused of going after Sierra. Get your facts straight.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:19 am
Foxontherun25,
I was highlighting the fact that you have people scanning Instagram for who liked who, and who is following who, speaking to the depth in which some have bought into this controversy. If that’s not you, don’t take it personal. But you cited this info in your comment, and I responded. Same for the Sierra Ferrell comment. I’m simply illustrating how this molehill of a situation is getting turned into a mountain disproportionately to how it should be handled. Right after I left my comment, someone left a comment here saying, “Sierra Ferrell really came out as a loony on this one.” So there you go. It’s not enough we go after Crockett for making the right decision to not have Satanists come out on stage and make his fans pledge their allegiance to Satan. Now we have to go after Sierra Ferrell. I’m not saying you are. I’m saying this illustrates the collateral damage being createed by the ludicrous amount of focus and rage on this issue.
July 11, 2026 @ 12:16 pm
FWIW, there’s a YouTube video of Charley at the Greek in LA from 2024 where Taylor, Shooter, Misty and a couple of rockabilly types I didn’t recognize are standing in the wings watching him. I realized yesterday that the couple is TT, looking nothing like satanists or anything except a couple of LA musicians. Seeing them now I can see that their act would have been a very bad fit for a CC show and they would not have gone over well.
Trigger, if anyone is wondering whether Shooter and Charley are still friends they should read the very long post SJ made to Facebook this morning. He really goes into depth about his friendship with CC and the making of Clovis.
July 11, 2026 @ 12:06 pm
Imagine being at Charley’s concert and the opening band has a satanic ritual and spits fake blood on your 100x custom beaver hat LOL like NOT today satan! Hard pass!
July 11, 2026 @ 11:34 am
That’s really interesting, and more or less confirms a suspicion I’ve always had about Crockett, along with a big part of his fanbase (as I’ve observed at about half a dozen of his live shows I’ve attended) – they’re blue city hipsters who treat everything as an ironic joke, obsessed with retro Americana kitsch, who dress up in heavily curated western-wear bought at expansive second-hand shops.
Wouldn’t surprise me if Crockett and his wife are, in fact, cool with Twin Temple – after all, the aesthetic and ethos is similar, even if the lyrical subject matter isn’t. It’s all a show and this kerfuffle is good press, because in this day and age there’s no such thing as bad press.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:45 am
“they’re blue city hipsters”— are they unhappy about something?
July 11, 2026 @ 12:56 pm
Oh, yes.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:15 pm
“Wouldn’t surprise me if Crockett and his wife are, in fact, cool with Twin Temple – after all, the aesthetic and ethos is similar, even if the lyrical subject matter isn’t. It’s all a show and this kerfuffle is good press, because in this day and age there’s no such thing as bad press.”
If this was they case, Charley would’ve just had Twin Temple open for them.
I’m telling you folks, it’s my job to monitor such things, gauge how the wind is blowing, and give an objective assessment. This thing is NOT going well for Charley Crockett whatsoever. To me, this is an empirical truth. I said in the article he would be fine in the long run and recover. I still think that’s mostly true. But seeing then venom that hardcore AMERICANA fans are coming after him with, including in this very comments section, I do think this will hurt him. Hell, they’re coming for Sierra Ferrell just because she spoke up in Charley’s defense. This is a total war scenario at the hands of an internet mob made up in part of Charley’s own fans.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:36 am
If all you’re saying is true (I’m not that deep into who follows who or who likes whose posts on socials), then there’s definitely something quite fishy going on here. Whether it’s a publicity stunt or some BTS politics gone haywire at the eleventh hour, who can tell?
And yes, Sierra Ferrell wading into this Alex Jones-style is just the icing on the cake. For what purpose? Again, who can tell?
July 11, 2026 @ 10:23 am
ALL HAIL THE GOAT!
HE WILL RISE.
\M/
July 11, 2026 @ 10:33 am
None of this will make Charley a good guitarist or singer.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:37 am
Throwing eggs at the poor girl’s window Trigger? That’s next level mischief. I feel better now since all I ever mustered the courage to do was kick over her book bag in homeroom! Thanks for the laugh!
July 11, 2026 @ 10:43 am
Any band that has been denounced by Alex Jones in the past is automatically fine by me.
Plus, RCB is right: Trig’s take on Satanism is uninformed. As much as there are theistic schools of thought within it, most of them are more symbolic and philosophical than anything else. This is something a quick search through Google and/or Perplexity would show you. But I guess holding on to the anti-religious cliché is just easier – in more ways than one, if you get my drift.
Anyways, anything I can do to fight media illiteracy is not enough, if I’m allowed to blow my own horn.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:35 am
My take on Satanism is extremely informed and correct. Satanism is a religion. It’s not anti-religion. Anti-religion is atheism, and doesn’t rely on the canon of Christianity to draw it’s beliefs and imagery from. Just like many people have adopted Christianity for their own devices, so have some people with Satanism. But as I expressly stated in the article, I don’t think Twin Temple are Satanists. They are art class hipsters from LA looking to virtue signal for their young adult friends in Silverlake. As an art project, I have respect for what Twin Temple is trying to do. But it’s a bit. Fuck Google AI and Perplexity. In a previous life, I studied this stuff very deeply. I don’t give a shit that hipsters want to practice Satanism as a philosophy. That’s not what it is. That’s like Sam Hunt putting out pop music and calling it country. Bullshit.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:58 am
You’re only undermining yourself here, Trig.
Satanism, like Christianity (and all other religions, really), has different schools of thought. Whether one is more “real” than the other is besides the point. Everything de/evolves over time and no subsect holds exclusive rights to anything. Just like country music or any other art form. It’s just a matter of choosing which one aligns the most with yourself – or embracing a little bit of (almost) every school of thought.
And just so you know, theology overlaps a lot with philosophy, even if they’re different in both practice and ideas. There’s even a school within philosophy which examines religious ideas through philosophical theory. So this is not about hipsters and all other kinds of generalizations – because that’s your main mistake here: you’re generalizing too much and reducing everything to primary colors and broad strokes. By doing that, you end up making a lot of the same mistakes which give social media a bad name; namely, the lack of nuance in thought. I expect more from a self-proclaimed journalistic form of media than that.
Anyways, to each his/her own. I’m not trying to change anyone’s mind, so much as I’m trying to make people see that the world is more shades of gray than black and white – unless you’re dealing with fascism/totalitarianism, of course. But then, those are schools of thought that won’t allow for nuance in any way, right?
July 11, 2026 @ 8:04 pm
“So this is not about hipsters and all other kinds of generalizations – because that’s your main mistake here: you’re generalizing too much and reducing everything to primary colors and broad strokes.”
I’ll take that criticism as fair. But to be honest, I wasn’t trying to generalize. I was trying to be sarcastic because instilling a little humor into this very, very stupid situation that too many folks are taking way too seriously and getting emotionally attached to was the only way I could broach it without feeling like I was going to vomit on myself.
July 11, 2026 @ 4:09 pm
You may be thinking of theological satanism as a religion. They do believe in a literal devil and are dangerous people. The theological satanists are by far a much smaller group, thankfully. Laveyan satanism, which is much more mainstream, is a religion but at the same time very anti-religious. Anton Lavey, the founder of the Satanic church and wrote the Satanic Bible was an atheist. The Bible he wrote says there is no supernatural god. There’s also another group, different from the other two, called The Satanic Temple, they don’t believe in any god either. You might already know but Hank 3 has made music with Anton’s grandson Stanton Levey. H3 has a song on his YouTube channel called Family Jams they did together.
But back to Charley. Had Twin Temple opened for him the crowd would have been smaller when took the stage. Many of his fans would have been so offended they wound have left. Charley has fans of all stripes. And the articles about that would have tried to cancel him.
The whole thing is a gigantic nonthingburger.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:52 am
All publicity is good publicity
CC & TT are the winners here.
Choose your side.
I’m team God
July 11, 2026 @ 10:54 am
Nah. Twin Temple is taking a big win here, Charley Crockett is taking such a big L, it’s bleeding over into other artists like Sierra Ferrell, and affecting perceptions on country music, country artists, and country fans in general.
Charley Crockett will be fine in the long-term. But this is in no way a PR boon for him.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:57 am
There must be a comedic gold mine in there somewheres !
July 11, 2026 @ 11:08 am
Sierra Ferrell really came out as a loony on this one.
July 11, 2026 @ 12:18 pm
Just because you don’t understand doesn’t make her a loony! Sierra lives in the light, you’re surprised she said “rebuke” to dark satan imagery? The post had a pic of a TT flyer asking if you accept satan as your lord and savior! I say REBUKE too!
July 11, 2026 @ 1:22 pm
The fact that we have roots/Americana fans now going after Sierra Ferrell too really speaks to the depravity and seriousness of this situation. Let’s just go ahead and knock out two of independent country’s primary headliners in our banishment of anyone who dare speaks out against Satanic rituals at country concerts.
But hell, why stop there. Tyler Childers has released songs like “Triune God” and “Old Country Church.” How are we supposed to put up with that? Hey, I heard Brandi Carlile is a Christian. She should be cancelled too.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:31 pm
The non-believers are not the intolerant ones in this situation. I have heard no one in the “satanist community” call for the canceling of a Christian show since this happened. This is pure made up nonsense and outrage, coming as usual from literal minded and superstitious people masquerading as humble common folk.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:47 pm
Jbird,
I really appreciate the perspective you’re bringing to this discussion, and I respect your position. However, it really feels like your someone who took your position on this issue very early on, and doesn’t want to come off it. I don’t know anyone who could watch a video of Twin Temple opening one of their shows, and think that’s a good idea to pair with a Charley Crockett concert. Charley made a mistake. He should have never booked them in the first place. When people started coming at him, instead of being contrite, he bristled up, and started trading jabs, which probably didn’t serve him well. But if your a band that starts off your shows with a Satanic ritual, you have to know your place in the world. And that place is not starting off country shows for Charley Crockett. If it was Hank3 or The Goddamn Gallows, I’d say full speed ahead!
July 11, 2026 @ 2:35 pm
I make my comments in good faith(unless I’m talking to honky), and I mean no disrespect in anyway. I’m not calling for the cancellation of anybody or for moral outrage. But it seems to me a matter of principal that if I’m expected to extend tolerance and acceptance to those whose beliefs I disagree with and find repulsive, I should at least expect the same in return. I consider myself a non-believer and would grant that the satanic church is really just a group of atheists who use a shocking name to illicit outrage. As far as genuine Satanists, who supposedly worship a deity or anti-deity, I’ve never met one, never heard of any in reality, and every time they are brought up, it is almost guaranteed to be by someone who is having psychosis induced visions or claims to be the victim of something like an alien abduction. The aftermath is always innocent people being accused of crimes They didn’t commit, most often by people who secretly wish to commit such crimes and usually do down the line. Meanwhile, none of that comes remotely close to the damage done by religion, organized and otherwise. Yet here we are speaking as if it’s understandable that we should all acquiesce to the outrage created by what is essentially close minded superstitious people.
July 11, 2026 @ 4:40 pm
TT are akin to Gwar. If you take them seriously, you are extremely gullible.
July 11, 2026 @ 5:02 pm
Yes, I said this, underscored this, and doubled down on it in the article.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:35 pm
Who is taking Gwar seriously? Nobody believes Gwar are actual aliens.
July 11, 2026 @ 11:41 am
Music can bring different groups together and thats a great thing, but inviting satanists to a country show sounds more like an old episode of Geraldo or Jerry Springer than it does an actual serious idea someone had. I’m glad they cancelled it before anything serious happened, but part of me is kind of bummed we didn’t get to see the chair throwing shitshow first.
July 11, 2026 @ 12:04 pm
maybe they aren’t true Satanists, but that doesn’t make them any less evil. that’s a good point that I’ve never thought of before. Don’t call yourself a satanist if you’re aren’t first willing to admit that god exists and Jesus died on the cross. can’t have one without the other for sure. either way, Charlie did the right thing about kicking these posers to the curb. he’s still an idiot for all of his political nonsense that he’s delved into lately, but he was right to ditch these morons.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:03 pm
They’re not evil, they’re not hurting anybody. It’s just art. Satanic imagery in rock ‘n’ roll is such a cliche at this point that I can’t believe some people are still shocked by it.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:40 pm
Extremely Christian gothic country artist 16 Horsepower (at least it’s front man is extremely Christian and he is one of the founders of the whole Gothic country sound) are playing at a heavy metal festival in a couple of weeks. Pretty sure there’s going to be a good mix of satanic and not at that event.
July 11, 2026 @ 4:01 pm
Is 16 Horsepower playing or Wovenhand? I thought 16 HP was long gone. I’d love to see DEE do more 16 HP stuff?
July 11, 2026 @ 12:13 pm
Great article Trig.
Crockett on stands to lose maybe some momentum and only casual fans. Real fans of Crockett this won’t mean shit. This dude delivers great music, that’s what matters.
And your right Trig, the new record is his best. It’s so much more than just a country record. That’s what’s hurt out of all of this, Clovis. This record is transcendent if given the right push. Now that’s lost with damage control.
TT are indeed the winners, or maybe wieners, er I mean whiners, ah fuck. I’m done.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:49 pm
That’s what I was thinking. All of this nonsense is taking the spotlight off Clovis, which is a helluva album that should be what CC fans are talking about. I hope Shooter’s excellent Facebook post about the making of the album and working with Charley will take some of the spotlight off this mess.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:20 pm
Unfortunately, a lot of the people attacking Charley Crockett have never heard of Charley Crockett previously, don’t know who Shooter Jennings is, and many don’t even know who Twin Temple is. They just heard that a MAGA country star was attacking a band for their Satanic “imagery” (dramatic downplay, btw), and joined the fracas on what they thought was the right side.
July 11, 2026 @ 3:49 pm
Crockett is MAGA? 🤔
July 11, 2026 @ 4:09 pm
No. He’s directly called out Trump multiple times. One of his responses to this who fracas started off “F–K TRUMP,” very specifically because that’s what so many online were attacking him for. That speaks to the ignorance many people have about who Charley Crockett is, and how it was political incitement that fed this stupid controversy.
July 11, 2026 @ 12:24 pm
Whether the duo is cosplaying or not, anyone downplaying the evil of leading crowds in pledges of allegiance to Satan needs to get an education from the Louvin Brothers…
July 11, 2026 @ 1:07 pm
That will always depend on whether the listener/reader even knows what nuance means. We can’t always throw the artists under the bus at all times. People need to take responsability for their lack of culture and (especially) critical spirit.
July 11, 2026 @ 12:42 pm
Let’s get something straight.
satanism is real.
satanic rituals are real.
Chicago, Illinois & Asheville, N. Carolina, are just a few of the havens for murderous rituals, carried out by satanists.
Live human babies are skinned, and their skins are stretched on tree trunks, to dry.
You truly do not want to know what satanists do.
Most people are blissfully unaware.
And, more to the point, GOD is Still in control
July 11, 2026 @ 1:33 pm
This is the comment of an unraveling mind.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:47 pm
: D And, you are an idiot.
Plain and simple.
Dangerous in your ignorance.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:21 pm
Well, Reagan caved back then and closed the asylums, so here you are.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:26 pm
Hahahahahahahahaha! “Live human babies are skinned, and their skins are stretched on tree trunks, to dry.” As far as you calling JBird an idiot, a Wilco song comes to mind. Since “GOD is Still in control”, why doesn’t omniscient and omnipotent God simply kill the baby skinners? If the government, or anyone with power, knew who the baby skinners were but couldn’t be arsed to stop them, you’d think they were a fucking scumbag. Why does God get a pass?
July 11, 2026 @ 5:45 pm
Hey Doug – if there is no God, on what moral grounds do you think it’s not perfectly acceptable to skin babies as anyone sees fit?
And… a Wilco song? Yawn…
July 11, 2026 @ 5:53 pm
Dan, morals do not require a belief in a god. It is immoral to skin and kill babies because I believe that it is immoral. I came to that conclusion on my own. Principles, ethics, morality, etc. are determined by the individual. A religion and other people can tell me what is right or wrong, but I will use my reasoning ability to decide if it does or does not fit my sense of right or wrong. Are you saying that if you were never exposed to, I assume, your religion, you would think it acceptable to kill and skin babies? And dry said skins on tree trunks?
July 11, 2026 @ 6:00 pm
So, your belief is if you determine your morals compel you to skin babies and also me or anyone you choose, it’s your prerogative to do so and it is morally correct because you say so?
July 11, 2026 @ 6:13 pm
Yes, if course. That individual would believe it moral. Since the majority, hopefully!, would believe it immoral, the “skinner”, if you will, would be arrested, tried, convicted and punished in a court of law. That is how civilized societies work. No religion required. The best case scenario is that fear of the legal system would keep them from “skinning”, but that is much too idealistic. Immoral people exist and always will.
July 11, 2026 @ 6:15 pm
I answered your question, Dan. I find it interesting that you did not answer mine.
July 11, 2026 @ 6:33 pm
Doug – if everyone can determine what is moral or legal on their own then we are all just primates who figured out fire, pants, and tools by chance. If moral law is decided by individuals at their whimsy then you are a believer in “might makes right”’. If no objective moral law exists then there can be no morality. It is subject to the whims of the individual at any moment. It is only because of Chistians that this is not a reality in western society. So yes, if I were not exposed to my religion and in fact if the entire world were not exposed to it as it exists now, this would not be the standard of our governance of the place that you love. Have you not read any western philosophical literature?.
July 11, 2026 @ 6:57 pm
Dan, I have read Western philosophical literature. I taught honors philosophy. I understood everything that you said. It still doesn’t explain why religion, or as you say Christianity, is required for humans to have societal morals. Oy vey!
July 11, 2026 @ 7:20 pm
Doug,
Something that you were not aware of, until today, is unfortunately true.
I know for a fact that this happens.
Trig loves to make fun of me, and that is his choice.
Trig also loves to make fun for letting him know that was part of the FBI family who was working the Asheville covens.
The wickedness and repulsion I felt for years that this indeed goes on is a very hard thing.
Did a University term paper on both this, and child predation.
When you have actual knowledge, and do nothing about it – that is on you.
As an FBI family out of God Help Us, Detroit, Charlotte, Tampa, & INDY, knew far more than ever wanted to know about what the covens were/are doing.
Now, it is on you, to man up, and do some research. Respectfully saying.
July 11, 2026 @ 7:51 pm
Also Dan, why are you yawning about a Wilco song? Pot Kettle Black is the perfect song to evoke when an idiot calls someone else an idiot.
July 11, 2026 @ 9:09 pm
Doug – moral law is a farce if every man decides his own moral law. Moral law based on Christian ideals is the singular influence that has produced Western civilization and culture in the modern era. To deny this is a literal and also a literary indication that you either did not understand or completely missed the supposed western philosophy that you taught as an “honors philosophy” teacher. Which is unfortunately not totally surprising.
And also Wilco is Low-T jamband rock. It literally sucks, energy out of every ear that hears it.
July 11, 2026 @ 9:37 pm
Your thick-headedness is exasperating. Regardless of your belief that Christianity has provided the morals for Western culture and civilization, a society can agree on morals for that society without looking to a religion. An individual living in that society can disagree and have their own moral code. They will also suffer the consequences if they act on those individual morals that differ from the society they reside in. Why is that so difficult for you to understand?
Your snide comment about teachers is not surprising. You are so kind and respectful. Describing anything as “Low-T” tells me all I need to know about you. Also regardless of your views on Wilco, it is a fact that the song title “Pot Kettle Black” describes Di Harris.
I’ll let you have the last word. I’m sure it will be “amen”.
July 11, 2026 @ 10:10 pm
Hey Doug –
As for thickheadedness, I’d rather die with a thick head instead of a thin argument.
What consequences should exist from acting different from a societal norm if every man decides what moral law is acceptable to him? Should each individual get to decide what consequences they receive for departing from the generally accepted moral law or should the majority that share the opinion get to decide?
Also, the fact that you take offense to the phrase “Low T” tells everyone what they already knew. So, enjoy your Wilco! Amen!
July 11, 2026 @ 10:22 pm
Dan, I requested we please move on from this comment thread. Doug respected this request. It would be great if you could as well. Thanks.
July 11, 2026 @ 6:31 pm
You don’t need a god to tell you that it is wrong to do things to other people that they do not want you to do. You don’t need a god to tell you to take things that don’t belong to you. There are countless psychology experiments that all primates have an inherent sense of fairness.
July 11, 2026 @ 6:36 pm
Haha. What about the primates who read each others faces and genitalia off, buddy? Is that a sense of fairness?
July 11, 2026 @ 6:49 pm
Dan, I was respectful and answered your questions. I again ask why did you not answer mine? I’ll ask once more. Are you saying that if you were never exposed to, I assume, your religion, you would think it acceptable to kill and skin babies? And dry said skins on tree trunks?
July 11, 2026 @ 9:28 pm
Doug – you are the one who has claimed the moral high ground and declared that morality is what you decide it is. I am not claiming that. I believe in a moral law that transcends generations and cultures. I do not believe in a moral law that says each person gets to decide what is right based on their interests according to what suits them at the moment. And yes, I believe also that I personally, and each one or us is prone to our own impulses without the realization that there is an absolute standard that none of us live up to, myself first and foremost of the transgressors. I can’t even live perfectly according to my own ideals. None of that is in any way evidence and clearly not proof that we are just highly evolved chimps and that it is the will of the mighty that is the de facto moral law. You don’t even believe this yourself, which means you are being intellectually dishonest with yourself and all of us.
July 11, 2026 @ 9:30 pm
Guys, I’m respectfully requesting we move on from this particular discussion. The back and forths are bogging down this comments section from much more relevant comments, and neither of you are going to see eye to eye at this point. Thank you.
July 11, 2026 @ 9:40 pm
I completely understand, Kyle. I left my comment that is currently being moderated prior to seeing your post. I respectfully request that you allow it, as I stated it would be my final comment. Thank you.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:18 pm
“They’re art class dorks from Los Angeles who try to eat a socially conscious diet and have a cat named Salem.”
One of the best sentences in the history of SCM.
July 11, 2026 @ 3:12 pm
I second that!
July 11, 2026 @ 1:28 pm
Regardless of whether they are actual Satanists or not is a moot point when they are asking people to pledge their allegiance to Satan and advocating for the sacrificing of infants. Words do in fact matter. And if you go along with that and especially if you lead people to do that, then you have chosen a side. At some point we all are faced with this decision, such is the nature of this existence whether we want to reckon with it or not. Charlie made the right decision here, however it came about.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:36 pm
I’m tired of Charley Crockett’s constant phony controversies. It makes him seem uncool. If it was a beef over a disagreement with one record label, I could understand. But beefing with multiple record labels PLUS an indie rock band PLUS everyone else he’s beefed with in the past several years (I can’t even keep up with it all)… there is a pattern here and the constant is Mr. Crockett. He’s either combative or cynical or both.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:40 pm
Twin Temple isn’t just an “indie rock band,” but your point and perspective stands. When all you hear about is drama from an artist, it gets tiring. We’ve seen this happen with Zach Bryan too.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:06 pm
Starting to think Charley just might not be a good businessman… Between this and the record label deals it seems clear he doesn’t really read the contracts he signs. And then he makes it worse by running his mouth on social media.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:34 pm
Crockett’s wife is behind most of it.
Charley is an empty vessel.
July 11, 2026 @ 1:53 pm
None of this would be as big of an issue if Crockett would have kept his big mouth shut and moved on, but he had to keep schizoposting, so here we are.
Trigger going off on Twin Temple, and what he believes Satanism to be, is pretty much typical behavior for him: he gets WAY too passionate and parasiocial defending his favorite artists, and he gets weirdly aggressive and insulting towards those he has apparent beef with–be it Tyler Mahan Coe, Zac Brown, and in this case Twin Temple.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:23 pm
“None of this would be as big of an issue if Crockett would have kept his big mouth shut and moved on, but he had to keep schizoposting, so here we are.”
100% agree.
As for the rest of it, did we step into a time portal to 2019? That was the last time I mentioned Tyler Coe, except when paying respects to his father in an obituary.
Zach Brown? Didn’t even know he was one of my adversaries.
As I stated in the article, Twin Temple is good at what they do. I’m not here to run them down. They came out the victors, far and away. But they had no business opening a country show.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:05 pm
If I went to a concert and the opener asked me to pledge allegiance to Satan I would leave.
I assume that I am not alone? Well written Trig.. it’s now Charley’s fault that I’m aware of these attention seeking fake-Satanists.
July 11, 2026 @ 2:30 pm
I think he purposely hired them to fire them as he’s been coming off pretty woke as of late. Trying to gain favor with a normally conservative if not normal, base. His mouth has to be hurting his sales
July 11, 2026 @ 2:54 pm
Trigger has disagreed with people on this point so I know he disagrees. But like I have met self identified “satanists” before and have talked to them. And they’re all exactly like the band in this article. I have asked hey if you believe in Satan doesn’t that mean you think you’re going to hell? Why would you want that?
And the answer I got always was oh I’m an atheist. I don’t believe in Satan. Satanism is a satire of organized religion. It’s there to make the point doesn’t it suck when you have to deal with people practicing their belief in fake supernatural beings in all aspects of your life. Oh you don’t like seeing this shit in public? That’s every day of your life as an atheist.
Just these people fit how I have always encountered these people. And of course it’s not satanists who control the world’s nuclear weapons and who bomb elementary schools. Thats Christians.
July 11, 2026 @ 3:38 pm
For the record and for clarification, I completely understand and am fully aware that there are people who follow the “Church of Satan” and some who consider themselves “Satanists” that are not ACTUAL Satanists that participate in human/baby sacrifice, etc. I’m not an idiot. And as I tried to underscore in this article that was meant to speak mostly to COUNTRY MUSIC fans, not organized Satanists, the members of Twin Temple are NOT the kind of baby-killing Satanists some think of when they see that term. I made that very specific distinction in the article, and though perhaps I could have been more demonstrative about it, it is definitely there, and intentional.
All that said, I will die on this hill that holds that you don’t have true, actual “Satanism” without Christianity, that it a derivative of Christianity, and that there is an element of people who do consider themselves actual “Satanists,” however small it might be. In a previous life, I very deeply studied ancient religions and religious origins, including Christianity and Satanism and Witchcraft, and hold to these truths as being foundational.
And again, this ills, excesses, and contradictions of Christianity is a completely separate topic. That doesn’t mean that Satanism is not Satanism.
Atheists are Atheists.
July 11, 2026 @ 4:31 pm
This is possibly the most ignorant comment in internet history. How many elementary schools have Christian’s bombed, exactly? And I defy you to tell me how Christians, or even the western Christian ideal system as a whole, has been a net negative in
world history.
July 11, 2026 @ 5:08 pm
Every president of the United States has been a Christian.
July 11, 2026 @ 5:27 pm
If it were true that every President of the United States was a Christian, and it is debatable at best, how many elementary schools have POTUS’s bombed, exactly?
July 11, 2026 @ 5:36 pm
As Commander-in-Chief?
July 11, 2026 @ 5:47 pm
Sure, Tom! Let’s hear it! Let’s also hear it from Harris…
July 11, 2026 @ 5:58 pm
Auto da fe. Crusades. Burning witches. Selling indulgences. Hiding child molesters. Promoting moral panics over imaginary happenings. Promoting the hatred of minority groups. Televangelists. Forced conversions. Persecuting heretics. Any number of wars between varying sects of Christianity. Bombing medical clinics. Murdering doctors. The KKK. Pogroms. Shooting up mosques. Shooting up synagogues. Justifying slavery as God’s will. Supporting fascist dictators. Hoarding wealth and preaching helping the poor.
The bombed elementary school they are referring to happened just weeks ago, when a President who posts pictures of himself in a Jesus-like role and his Secretary of Defense who believes in a version of Christianity that is literally at war with the secular world decided to launch cruise missiles without paying attention to what was an Iranian military site and what was an elementary school.
Not that Christianity is unique in the evil done in its name, pretty much every organized religion has blood on their hands whether they admit it or not.
July 11, 2026 @ 8:13 pm
Matt – where are examples of Christian’s bombing elementary schools in this example? Trump has never and this is important, never called himself a Christian or been a representation of the Christian Church or body of believers. So did a Christian bomb an elementary school in the name of Christ or do you have a weak ass position that is silly in an intellectual debate. As for the Crusades? Did you do any research on this? Forced conversions? Have you actually read history? Hatred of minority groups? Brother, do you know that the most diverse coalition of individuals and nationalities and thing groups in the world is Christianity? Bombing medical clinics? I will bet you that the Weather Underground has bombed far more. Shooting up synagogues by Christians? Show me the stats? Shooting up mosques? I defy you to tell me how many more Muslims have been shot up in mosques than Christian’s have been in churches? Do you want to know where chattel slavery came from? Or that more Europeans were slaves than Africans because of Islam? And let’s not wash over the fact that there have probably been many Christian pedophiles, but the doctrine itself and its leader is wholly against it, but, Islam is for it and it’s prophet participated in it. When did Christians support fascist dictators? You are brainwashed. Christianity has been the greatest force for good in the world as we have seen it for the last 2,000 years and everything you enjoy right now is because of it. So believe in whatever you want, but Christians aren’t your enemy.
July 11, 2026 @ 6:22 pm
Us American Indians, who were slaughtered wholesale in pursuit of a Calvinist homeland, quite strongly believe western “Christianity “ to be a net negative, funnily enough.
July 11, 2026 @ 8:35 pm
You guys slaughtered a millenia worth of other Indians yourselves, did you not?
July 11, 2026 @ 9:08 pm
If what you are saying is true, then you are saying 2 wrongs make a right? Christians slaughtering indigenous people’s is moral because indigenous people slaughtered other indigenous people? Best logic ever!
July 11, 2026 @ 9:42 pm
Wrong Doug, again and a pattern emerges. Two wrongs never make a right, but the facts are that Calvinist Christian’s didn’t slaughter most of the Indians and Christianity itself preserved most of what is left of the native North Americans until this day. There was a significant battle over the plains and eastern Rockies between Europeans and the Native North Americans, and in many instances, Indians were mistreated. But hey guess what, the Native Americans were immigrants here as well. What right did they have to slaughter Europeans simply for coming here? Did someone slaughter them when they came? Further, they were the originators of slave trade on this continent. So, what do you care if racist slaver owners were conquered?
July 11, 2026 @ 3:28 pm
My unsolicited 2 cents: Everything about this dude is so corny. The band is hot but I can’t get past the hokey Branson, MO ham-fisted “authentic outlaw cowboy” act. He lays it on so thick which I assume is to compensate for the fact that he can’t write, play, or sing all that well. He’s got a decent wardrobe but still looks like someone you’d catch at a matinee in the Howdy Doody section of a Six Flags. And it would be good fun in that context. But I’ll also be the first to admit that I haven’t delved too much into the music because everything I hear about this guy is about anything but the music. So maybe I just haven’t heard the right songs if anyone would like to recommend some. But so far, to me, it just seems that his popularity is another symptom of an American public that is so disconnected from truth where everything is performative. Which can be fine in the arts since performance is part of it a lot of the time. I love a guy like Tom Waits who seems to be playing a character but also never felt compelled to explain it to his audience. But since the main staple of the American diet is bullshit we stay sucking at the teat of artifice. Plus, this guy just seems like he wants to be famous. This country is imploding and we’re still getting run of the mill, tear in my beer dreck with the sole motive to get a hold of the attention economy and cash out. I need some songs from the heart. Not these tossed off anachronistic ditties that all sound like they got the AI-assisted alley-oop. I’ve seen a video where he’s asked how he writes a song and, in his unmistakable and totally not phony accent, he says first thing he does is listen to some George Jones. He admits that it’s mimicry at best. Ok, I’m rambling. The music industry is so depressing is the real takeaway. And the stuff with substance will always sink to the bottom while the turds float to the top. I’ll show my self the door now. PEACE AND LOVE
July 11, 2026 @ 5:48 pm
Charley is a character man. The dude has had an unusual life. He’s rolled the dice many times and finally hit the jackpot playing his style of music; he calls it Gulf & Western. The Man From Waco and $10 Dollar Cowboy are a good place to start. New album Clovis is good too.
July 11, 2026 @ 8:25 pm
I listened to the new album in its entirety. Part of me feels like I was being harsh and that I can’t really knock the hustle. I live in Austin and do some work behind the scenes and I know just how hard it is to make a living doing the thing. But on the other hand, as a die hard music lover and player, it offends me to no end. It’s so middle of the road and really has no reason to exist. It’s decent background music. If I was in an uber and it was on I would feel relieved that they weren’t blaring some auto-tune gibberish or psyop pop.
I also know people that have worked with him and said this album was influenced by watching old westerns. Meanwhile, the world is on fucking fire. You’d think a songwriter worth his ilk would have no problem finding some contemporary inspiration. But at this point I feel like a lame for adding to the rumor mill. But that’s his fault by making it about anything but the music.
Per the Satan band…Full disclosure, I am a sucker for anything that dabbles in the left-hand path. I’m currently reading a book by a self-proclaimed Satanist (shoutout Mitch Horowitz). But this band is just as corny as Charley. They truly are two peas in a pod. I heard about them a couple of years ago and came to a quick conclusion. I’m not entirely convinced that this wasn’t just some grand PR stunt that backfired, but might also end up benefitting both in the end as it was the plan all along. All press is good press, right?
But I gotta leave on a more positive note. I feel like if I tear an artist down that I should at least recommend someone who I do enjoy, even if I’m not particularly fond of playing the comparison game. And it probably is apples to oranges, but I just threw on the record of one of my favorite artists and live shows from last year. Ryan Davis and the Roadhouse Band – New Threats From The Soul. It might be more alt-country, but it’s Americana to the core. And he’s been at it for years with multiple bands, owns a record label, and doesn’t feel the need to run his mouth to get press. Just lets the songs do the talking
July 12, 2026 @ 6:04 am
I hear ya man, Charley’s music isn’t for everyone. The first album I heard of his was Jukebox Charley, a bunch of old school country covers. I thought his sound was different and pretty cool… Austin has a great music scene! There should be some underground Americana or Country musicians in that area most of us haven’t heard about. I checked out Ryan Davis and the Roadhouse Band. Not a big fan of 10-minute songs but I do like his voice and the sound. Thanks for the recommendation. Charley’s music is heavily influenced by the late Texas Country musician James Hand. He was a Texas Country singer who never got the credit he deserved. He was the real deal. As for the boogyman band in this article, I think their music is gimmicky and monotonous; if you’ve heard one song you’ve pretty much heard them all. I could see them playing the victim card here but most people just don’t care because of what they represent. About the Western film influences on Clovis, that makes sense, the song Clovis sounds like it’s should be in a Western film. Yes, the world’s on fire and Charley’s music doesn’t reflect that. But what it does offer is an escape for a little bit. If I want protest music I’ll go find some punk rock.
July 11, 2026 @ 3:32 pm
I just watched a couple of their videos. I kind of laughed at the imagery. I felt like a legitimate satanic artist wouldn’t try this hard. Unless, of course, this is their lifelong obsession to spread this message and cosplay. I saw the video for their song sex majgick since it’s full of nudity and the usual outline of what satanists might do. I felt like meh…whatever…it’s nothing new and completely expected. The same drama Ozzy Osbourne and Motley Crue and
Dio kind of did in the 80s. Dio’s “Holy Diver” album cover is as sacrilegious as one can get.
I don’t like the music. They do perform it well and she is a good singer. Not my thing. CC should have checked them out before booking them. That’s the mistake. Maybe he did – maybe this is a stunt that they are all in on. Because it all seems so silly to me.
July 11, 2026 @ 3:40 pm
Starting a show with a pledge to the devil is not a good thing, satire or not. I guarantee you that dark forces will take it as an opportunity to imbed themselves into the lives of humans, whether that declaration was serious or in jest.
July 11, 2026 @ 3:56 pm
Precisely.
July 11, 2026 @ 4:20 pm
So “dark forces” are capable of embedding themselves into the lives of humans, but only if a pledge or declaration to the devil is made. Therefore they can only use this amazing power if a human asks them? The same as how incredibly powerful vampires can only enter a building if a human invites them in? But a human with no supernatural powers can influence me without my asking them to or kick my door down and walk in. It all makes perfect sense.
July 11, 2026 @ 5:16 pm
They can influence humans in many ways without a direct invitation, but said invitations can allow for greater demonic control.
July 11, 2026 @ 5:23 pm
Ergo someone could be partially controlled by demons without a direct invite but completely controlled with an invite. The demons wouldn’t be able to use their uninvited partial control to eventually acquire complete control. The demon is unable to use their partial control to get the possesed to invite them, thereby gaining total control. Again, this all makes perfect sense. The logic is sound.
July 11, 2026 @ 9:09 pm
No reply, sir?
July 12, 2026 @ 11:42 am
Sorry, I’m not chronically online.
Would you rather take a shot of arsenic or drink a cup of it? Neither is good, but one is worse.
July 11, 2026 @ 4:33 pm
Lmao
July 11, 2026 @ 3:53 pm
For the record… there is absolutely no credible evidence proving the existence of organized satanic cults that murder or sacrifice babies. It’s not a thing.
July 12, 2026 @ 10:45 am
Lee has said it, so that settles the argument.
July 11, 2026 @ 4:32 pm
Canceling shows because of Satan, what is this the fucking 80s? Satan isn’t real. Time to move on past the religious psychosis people.
July 11, 2026 @ 5:01 pm
“Satan isn’t real. Time to move on past the religious psychosis people.”
Who are you taking to, the non religious Charley Crockett, or the act that opens their shows with a Satanic ritual, Twin Temple?
July 11, 2026 @ 4:44 pm
I have lost all respect for this website, as someone who has been a target of spiritual warfare you have now clue what you are talking about
July 11, 2026 @ 7:31 pm
Well it breaks my heart that I’ve lost a reader, but I think a lot of folks have lost focus on exactly what’s happening here.
First off, the score is Satanists: 1 / Charley Crockett: 0
You won. Twin Temple won. This has been the biggest publicity boon of their career. This is a career defining moment for them, and it might be a career defining moment for Crockett, only in the opposite direction.
So what are folks complaining about? The empirical fact that if Twin Temple had come out on stage opening for Charley Crockett by commencing a Satanic ritual and demanding a bunch of country fans pledge allegiance to Satan, it would have been a disaster for everyone, including Twin Temple? Ultimately, it was Charley Crockett who pulled the boner here. But he did a HUGE favor to them pulling them off those dates, and that’s before the whole imbroglio that’s blowing them up in popularity.
If you’re Twin Temple, this situation is everything you could have ever dreamed of. The whole point of your presentation is to shock, repulse, to be edgy, to stir discussion and controversy. They just accomplished that more than they ever would have without Charley Crockett’s help.
And now you want to get mad at a country music blog because it won’t affirm your worldview? Are y’all Satanists, or people who like to clothe themselves in victimhood?
I appreciate you and everyone else reading, and I always encourage feedback. But I think there’s a lot of folks who need to take a step back from the emotional reaction they’re having to this issue, and appreciate how incredibly stupid this entire episode is.
July 11, 2026 @ 7:30 pm
Hank III evoked Satan.
Look where it got him.
July 12, 2026 @ 6:00 am
It’s too bad all this BS is going to overshadow what a great album Clovis is. The dude has a chance to REALLY break out with this album which I think is his best ever. And instead, we are needing to address goofy things like this. Lets hope this leads to more folks hearing Clovis, but I doubt it will.
July 12, 2026 @ 6:09 am
“Their “Satanism” is equivalent to a 14-year-old boy throwing eggs at the bedroom window of a girl he likes before smoking a joint with his friends behind the local Dollar General.” This is some of your best writing, Trig! Great article! I also need to say that between his political posturing, the Clovis debacle, and this silliness, it’s getting very hard to listen to Charley, for me at least. Sometimes the background noise comes through a little too strong and clouds things.
July 12, 2026 @ 7:30 am
So did any number of blues musicians, Robert Johnson being only the most famous. Because I happen to own it, I know of at least one anthology — I’m sure there are others — devoted to genre recordings in which the devil plays a leading role. Yet blues fans have never fallen into anything like pearl-clutching over Satan’s presence in their music. Attendant lurid rumors and scary anecdotes such as we’ve seen cited in this thread have been notable by their absence.
I might add that Satan is also a character in the occasional centuries-old traditional ballad, where he is sometimes treated (gasp) as a comic character.
True, TT is a particular vapid instance of Satanic imagery. When the couple responsible finally grow up, I expect that they will feel hugely embarrassed by their youthful excess. Maybe they’ll blame hormones.
July 12, 2026 @ 7:39 am
Yeah, citing the devil in a song about selling your soul at the crossroads, or burying a pentagram on an album cover in the ’80s to be a edgy hair metal band is WAY different than starting your show with a straight up Satanic ritual where you come out and demand the audience pledge allegiance to Satan, and your whole bit is every single song is about Satan. Are some people “pearl clutching” here? I guess. But this would have never gone over well at a Charley Crockett concert. Never. It would have been a catastrophe. And so though I appreciate people want to stand up for artistic freedom, the right decision was made here by all parties.
July 12, 2026 @ 8:13 am
I beg to differ.
Each of these instances represents a kind of non-evangelical image of Satan and his role in human affairs. In popular and vernacular songs Satan is often not condemned explicitly or even implicitly. He’s may be just part of the world, to be accepted or, if one wishes, celebrated or emulated (in, e.g., sexual virility and/or betrayal, amoral prowess), or even to serve as a cudgel (as with TT) ith which to beat evangelical literalists, however witlessly.
I praised your piece precisely because it did not clutch pearls. Or so I thought until you clutched them. Though I agree that for all kinds of reasons Crockett should never have hired these clowns — and since they don’t have a constitutional right to work for him, freedom of expression is an irrelevant issue — what TT is doing is simply an extension of cultural elements that were waiting to be exploited long before you took note of this particular manifestation.
July 12, 2026 @ 8:44 am
I’m not “clutching pearls.” I’m creating distinctions. There’s a difference between someone spilling a glass of water, and a water mane breaking in your front yard.
July 12, 2026 @ 9:20 am
Your grasp of Satanic imagery in blues seems limited to the extreme (and cliched) legend of Robert Johnson’s deal with the devil. The imagery is far more pervasive and diverse than that even within Johnson’s repertoire. Moreover, the context is that within Southern rural culture in the genre’s formative years many devout non-fans thought blues artists were active recruiters for Satan.
You’re a busy man, I know, and I sincerely appreciate what you do for us, even when we disagree. But those of us who have time to educate ourselves in other roots genres that you clearly don’t know a lot about — not a crime, understand; you know far more about independent country than I ever will — would sincerely appreciate not being lectured on what’s to know about them.
July 12, 2026 @ 10:57 am
My knowledge of blues music might be limited compared to yours, but that doesn’t mean it’s zero.
Show me the old blues guy who opened his shows with a ritual at a Satanic alter with blood dripping down his mouth before leading the audience in an allegiance chant to Satan, and I’ll eat my hat.
Apples and bowling balls comparison is all I’m saying.
July 12, 2026 @ 11:34 am
Trig,
The connecting thread between old-time blues singers and modern-day pseudo-Satanists like TT is this, as I seem not to be able to make clear to you: it’s playful use of Satanic imagery.
It’s not literal note-for-note repetition, and it’s not literal worship of the devil.
Jeez.
July 12, 2026 @ 7:53 am
Lmao I knew you would have the worst fucking take on this. It’s actually embarrassing how predictable (and uninformed) your opinions are. Not as embarrassing as Cosplay Crockett and his self-mythologizing wall of text, granted, but nonetheless.
July 12, 2026 @ 8:40 am
Can you help me identify how many inches of insulation I REALLY need in my attic? It’s always so confusing.
July 12, 2026 @ 8:18 am
Except Twin Temple is not demanding anything of the audience. The audience can just choose to… not pledge allegiance to Satan, and go grab a beer, check out the merch, or do any of the things that people do if they aren’t digging the opening act.
July 12, 2026 @ 8:55 am
Look. You can think that Twin Temple is a cool band. I think what they’re doing is kind of cool and inventive. You can be for artistic freedom, and believe even a band that opens their shows with a Satanic ritual and compels the audience to pledge allegiance to Satan. You can believe anyone that is offended by that is a pearl-clutching prude. The truth remains, if Twin Temple had opened shows for Charley Crockett, it would have been a disaster for Twin Temple, for Charley Crockett, for the venue, for everyone. People would have left. People would have pulled their phones out, filmed it, posted it on social media, and it would have created outrage. Whether you think it should or not is irrelevant.
Also, THAT IS THE ENTIRE POINT OF TWIN TEMPLE, to shock, to outrage, to push entertainment to the edge, to enrage pearl clutchers. They won in this instance, and Charley Crockett lost. Everything that Twin Temple was built to do was accomplished in this situation without a lick of music being played.
And who is the offended party who won’t let it go? It’s the “Satanists.” They’re the ones being whiny, entitled little babies.
You won. Game over. Now put on a shit-eating grin and move on.
July 12, 2026 @ 8:32 am
If you ask someone to be an opener you have every right to hire or fire them at will for any reason or no reason at all.
My question though is why charley would hire them without listening to their music beforehand. Seems bizarre. Why hire them at all if you don’t know what they sound like? Seems poor decisions on Charley’s contributed to this mess. If he had done his due diligence and taken time to listen to the band they wouldn’t have been hired in the first place. I get being the head honcho comes with stresses and mistakes can be made. This isn’t just a whoopsie oh I forgot to get us water bottles mistake. This is a monumental one and I think shows the poor mental and emotional state of charley. If you hire people without looking into them, what else are you skimping and being careless about?
Lastly, the whole anti trump and anti ice dig he got in in the announcement is moronic. The band he kicked off isn’t republicans nor trump supporters and it has no bearing on trump or Republicans at all. Republicans aren’t known for attracting a large satanic voter base at the polls. To me it seems charley is just self serving, rude and mendacious and wanted to take a non political event. One that’s his own fault, ice and trump weren’t careless in hiring the band. Charley was and is at fault.
He’s a bitter, failed musician, who has put out more music in his fairly short tenure than most will in 50 years. Yet despite the large catalogue he has zero hits, he isn’t influential and will be a footnote in his own subgenre. He makes glorified classic country cover songs that despite being recorded recently, sound dated and staid compared to the classic sounds of 50 years ago. He’s jealous too. Country isn’t interested in his brand of music. He’s been passed over and passed by more talented artists whose work connects with millions of listeners in a way his songs never will. Morgan Wallen whatever you think of him as a person will be remembered and his music means something to millions of fans. He’s the most successful country musician of his lifetime. He has hits upon hits upon hits. Charley will not be remembered nor does he have hits. He isn’t even the most famous and successful person in his own subgenre.
Ultimately it just shows the sad and wasted ways of an artist who never has connected with an audience and even if he releases 60 more albums, likely never will connect.
July 12, 2026 @ 10:42 am
Are you Morgan Wallen’s publicist?
July 12, 2026 @ 10:26 am
‘Their “Satanism” is equivalent to a 14-year-old boy throwing eggs at the bedroom window of a girl he likes before smoking a joint with his friends behind the local Dollar General.”‘
Brilliant.
Trig, you are the Shakespeare of modern music criticism. Bravo.
July 12, 2026 @ 11:02 am
No disrespect to Trigger whatever, but the Shakespeare of modern music criticism is actually Greil Marcus.
July 12, 2026 @ 11:04 am
Dr. Steve Brown once said, “There’s nothing worse than a weenie Christian, except for a weenie atheist.” I’ve met a lot of weenie atheists in my life, and only two real ones.
Most headlining acts don’t know who’s opening their shows. When I was managing a country artist years ago, one headliner had no idea who he was, and, even after meeting and hanging out backstage before both shows, couldn’t remember my artist’s name and kept referring to him as Chewbacca during his own set.
“Let’s have another big round of applause for Chewbacca.”
“I’m going to be bring Chewbacca out to do a song with us tonight.”
It was hilarious.
It’s seems Charlie knew at least knew this duo casually, but perhaps he didn’t know what a clown show they were. Once he found out, he chose to remove them. A good choice. I can’t imagine their schtick going over well with Chuck’s audience.
As Bob Dylan wisely sang so long ago, “You’ve got to serve somebody.”
July 12, 2026 @ 11:29 am
Bottom line, it’s pretty cool we live in a time where faux satanic throwback doo wop exists.