Album Review – Taylor Swift’s “Speak Now” (Taylor’s Version)

Yes, we’re going here, and for good reason.
Taylor Swift’s Speak Now is the best album of her career. That’s certified by how it sold the least amount of copies out of her original five albums. It includes her best song, “Dear John.” It includes her most country song, the double Grammy-winning “Mean.” It includes all songs that she wrote by herself—something absolutely unprecedented in mainstream country, let alone from a woman, and even more striking from one under the legal drinking age at the time the album was released. Swift also produced the album, with assistance from multi-instrumentalist Nathan Chapman.
Speak Now marked a significant shift in the career of Taylor Swift, in the trajectory of country music, and in all of popular music in ways that are still resonating today, both positively, and in many respects, adversely. It symbolizes a crossroads in Taylor Swift’s life from girl to woman, and from a career of pretend country to almost purely pop. But the songwriting is what has endured, and makes it worth remarking upon as the new “Taylor’s Version” of this album is released.
No strong opinion is tendered here about Taylor deciding to re-record her music after the sale of her masters to Ithica Holdings and Scooter Braun, who later sold them to Shamrock Capitol. Though Big Machine Records owner Scott Borchetta has been handsomely criticized for not selling the masters to Swift directly, it’s not as if the vast majority of major label artists ever get the opportunity to own their own music. Borchetta took a chance on Swift when nobody else would, and except for Taylor herself, he is the person most responsible for her overwhelming success. This opinion is coming from someone who in 2010 when Speak Now was originally released was regularly referring to Borchetta as the “Country Music Antichrist.”
Regardless, Taylor Swift has made a mint re-recording her old Big Machine albums, and good for her. Artists should own their own music. Garth Brooks is the king of selling consumers the same song twice (or three or four or five times), and even he must be sitting back and salivating over how one can pull off a similar scheme to Swift. Other country artists have re-recorded their old songs in the past, and they fade like a fart in the wind. Taylor Swift is setting chart records with them. It’s good work if you can get it.
Regarding the differences between the old versions and the new versions of the Speak Now songs, there is little to no significant change. It’s hard to recreate some of the original guitar tones, or to get the mixing quite right where the match is exact. But if your gray matter has latched onto the original versions and you hear these new ones, it won’t put up much of an objection. Swift’s vocal signal does seem a bit stronger on the newer versions, matched to what is probably now a stronger and more confident singer than 13 years ago. Remember, “Mean” was written in response to criticism Swift received for singing out of tune with Stevie Nicks on the Grammy Awards, including from Saving Country Music.
Some gruff has been given about Swift deciding to change a line in the song “Better Than Revenge” from “She’s better known for the things that she does on the mattress” to “He was a moth to the flame, she was holding the matches.” To some this is the musical equivalent of making Greedo shoot at Han Solo first in the Mos Eisley space port. Creators can’t help but go back and change things that have always bothered them in newer versions. But in this instance, the line still works, even if Swift is trying to hide some of the immaturity of her writing at the time.
Speak Now (Taylor’s Version) also includes two of the three songs originally released on the deluxe version of the album, including “Ours” that became a #1 country song (“If This Were A Movie” is left off). All of these new versions were produced by Swift with Christopher Rowe, giving them a similar consistency to how Swift originally recorded the songs exclusively with Nathan Chapman.
Then the new Speak Now version also offers six “From The Vault” songs written by Swift herself presumably for the original Speak Now sessions, but that never made it on the original or deluxe edition. Aside from “Ours,” the deluxe edition selections were already a bit of a step down in quality, and when it comes to the “From The Vault” material, it’s arguably a step down even further.

There is a reason these songs were 86’d from the album originally, though you can’t necessarily fault Swift for including them here to give dedicated fans something new in this re-recorded album, and perhaps contractual obligations would have allowed scrapped studio versions of these songs to be released in the future, so Swift might have wanted to beat them to the punch. Still, a song like “Emma Falls in Love” meanders and struggles to make its point, forgoing the often incisive lyricism of Speak Now.
Unlike all the original and deluxe tracks of Speak Now (Taylor’s Version), Swift uses producers Aaron Dessner and Jack Antonoff on the “From The Vault” tracks, and you can tell because they don’t exactly fit with the rest of the record. Antonoff chooses to use electronic drums and other MIDI/laptop-constructed music to built out Swift’s collaboration with Hayley Williams called “Castles Crumbling.” The original Speak Now sessions were nearly all organic, at times even veering into aggressive rock. Jack Antonoff is the king of taking country acts and turning them even more pop.
Arguably the gem of the “From The Vault” selections is the final track called “Timeless.” This is where you find Taylor Swift’s insightful writing re-emerge, and the track is surprisingly organic in its instrumentation with guitar and ukelele, despite Antonoff being behind the mixing board.
– – – – – – – – –
But beyond the unique contours to these new recordings or reactions to the newish songs, Speak Now (Taylor’s Version) offers an awesome opportunity for a retrospective upon how this album helped portend future events that have present and future implications in music. It really was a fulcrum of cultural change in country music and beyond.
It was due to the album’s poor commercial performance that Scott Borchetta decided Taylor Swift’s songs needed more “lift,” and invited pop super producers Max Martin and Shellback into the process, which facilitated Taylor Swift’s shift to pop entirely. Their collaborations made up the lion’s share of her next album Red, leading to her album 1989 where Swift outright declared her allegiance to pop forevermore.
The reverberations of this action are still very much felt in country music today. To traditionalists in 2010, Taylor Swift and her two CMA Entertainer of the Year Awards posed the greatest existential threat to the genre that had ever existed up to that point, or so they thought. When Swift won her first Entertainer of the Year in 2009, some top musical pundits of the time declared country music dead, and placed the blood on Swift’s hands.
Little did we know what major label executives like Scott Borchetta had in store for us in the coming years. Borchetta signed a promising young duo named Florida Georgia Line, ultimately leading to the scourge of Bro-Country so catastrophically infesting the country industry from stem to stern that we prayed for the era when Taylor Swift’s little pop songs were the worst that country music had to offer.
Taylor Swift’s departure also helped facilitate the virtual evisceration of female representation in the mainstream country genre, not just because it ushered in the Bro-Country era, but because Swift took her highly-awarded, super popular, and radio play-assured music to other pastures, leaving a gaping hole we’re not just the most popular woman in all of country music once stood, but where the most popular artist in all of country music once stood.
But a lot of people held a newfound respect for Taylor Swift after she officially declared herself a pop artist. She was finally being honest, confirming what purists and traditionalists had been saying the whole time, and alleviating that conflict by leaving the country genre. To this day, it would be great if other pop artists such as Sam Hunt and Maren Morris would follow her lead. And from Swift being so forthright, country fans could actually enjoy her music and songs without all the drama and concern about them being mislabeled.
It was also through Speak Now that many of Taylor Swift’s staunchest critics found a higher level of respect for her. By writing and producing the album herself, she quashed the criticisms that she was a product and puppet of the industry.
Taylor Swift took her heartbreak from John Mayer who was 32 when she was 19, and turned it into a epic, nearly 7-minute track. She took the criticism for her singing, and turned it into a Grammy-winning country song. She took the loss of her own innocence, and cemented those feelings superbly in “Never Grow Up.” She learned how to be wrong and humble in “Back to December.” And these songs were so good, Taylor Swift can release them a second time and they still resonate—and according to the numbers, they resonate even more than her two previous album re-releases, setting Spotify records.
Speak Now is the real Taylor Swift, and always will be. It’s Taylor Swift after she had matured into her true self, and before the denizens of commercial pop got a hold of her. It’s not perfect, and it’s definitely not country. But it’s sincere human sentiments set to organic music, and something that has clearly withstood the last 13 years, and will likely withstand many, many more.
– – – – – – – – – –
Purchase Speak Now (Taylor’s Version)
July 11, 2023 @ 9:11 am
Not to sound like Anton ego in the opening lines of ratatouille, but I feel like we live in some sort of dystopian chef gusteau Influenced nightmare where just anyone can create music
And no, I don’t believe anyone can create music.
And frankly, I believe Taylor Swift helped usher in this bizarre signal shift in the music world, in which, and from which was born this misconception that as long as you get the right people to help you, people will want to listen to whatever is on your mind, set to Music.
I believe creating music at a professional level, requires maturity, charisma, insight, and most of all, ability
Most of maturity comes with age, but every time I point out that I don’t wanna hear high school music by people barely out of high school people point out that Hank Williams was in his 20s when he was riding his music. That was a long time ago. Get over it. Regardless of how old Hank Williams was, I don’t wanna hear high school thoughts from people, barely out of high school on radio stations, in movies, or in any other format.
Yes, high school was bad to me. It was a place where shallow, clueless people interacted with curriculum Regurgitator’s who would hand you a problem in math class that asked how long it would take 30 musicians to play Beethoven if 60 musicians did it in 45 minutes
When I got out of high school, I couldn’t look back. And Taylor Swift was really popular when I got out of high school. And Florida Georgia Line was just around the corner. And maybe my aversion, to her, and to them, and that style of music, was just how juvenile it all was
Great, Taylor Swift has matured, it’s about damn time. Maybe over a decade of performing on stage regularly will have given her enough practice to sing on pitch.
But the damage has been done. A whole bunch of children in adult bodies started producing music with the mentality of a teenager, for people with them in Tallardy of a teenager. And that is the cardinal sin. The opinions of teenagers have no business in adult spaces. That’s why you teenagers already have their own music space where they can listen to the Jonas Brothers and Justin Bieber.
But normalizing, allowing stuff intended for teenagers to dominate formats meant for adults is damaging not just to country music but to all music, all movies, and all media.
That’s why Fox doesn’t play Pokémon. I love Pokémon, but it belongs on the cartoon channel. It doesn’t belong on Fox, Hallmark, or truTV.
Comic books don’t belong on the shelf at bed Bath and beyond anymore than a my pillow belongs on the shelf at a comic book store.
And now we live in a world where lots of childish music has inundated country music. And we are finally getting it shoveled out. Unfortunately, the damage has been done and a whole bunch of people went through middle school, high school and college thinking that that was normal for country music. There are grown ass adults who think country music should sound like one endless tailgate party and a rural stereotype because that’s what it sounded like when they were in seventh grade.
Props to Taylor Swift, for saying that she wasn’t country, but that was a little too little too late. She already had a whole world of people hoodwinked into thinking the future of music was letting teenage artists Take music intended for teenagers into adult stations and adult intended airplay.
Pokémon belongs on the cartoon channel. Hannah Montana belongs on the Disney Channel. Worlds dumbest belongs on the adult channel. Family guy belongs on adult swim. Music, intended for teenagers belongs in stations and labels and festivals intended for teenagers. And Music intended for adults belongs at events, and in airspace is intended for adults.
And blurring that line means somebody could put a steel guitar in Rebecca blacks Friday and release it to country radio.
It’s not about whether or not Taylor Swift is talented, it’s about whether her insights belong in place is intended for adults when she’s a teenager, making music for people, her own age.
That’s why Mark O’Connor was supposed to play in the junior division in the national fiddle contests. It wasn’t whether or not he was good enough to compete with the adults. Of course he was. Winning against the adults was a foregone conclusion. The point is keeping the sanctity of the contests space
July 11, 2023 @ 9:30 am
First off, Fox did have a Mon anime in the form of Digimon that aired to counteract Pokémon because they realized too late they made a mistake passing on it given how much money it made Warner Brothers
Secondly by your logic Johnny Cash shouldn’t have recorded “My Grandfather’s Clock” “I’m being swallowed by a boa constrictor” (yes he recorded this Shel Silverstein song) and “Rock Island Line” because they were children’s songs and therefore unfit for adult radio even though plenty of oldies stations play them with other fare like BJ the DJ. I think what the problem is how the message is handled; Swift is incapable of doing anything that’s not whining about broken relationships and trolls and that includes covers she did like Last Christmas and summer of 69. If she could find something else to sing it would’ve done better but that sadly hasn’t happened yet.
July 20, 2023 @ 7:25 pm
As an aside: seeing both Pokémon and Digimon brought up on SCM is mind-boggling stuff. And I’ve been a fan of both and country music since childhood.
It’s probably not that surprising, with the passage of time and younger generations of country emerge. In fact, there is another country blog (by another Kyle) that posts about Splatoon and other Nintendo games as well.
July 11, 2023 @ 9:39 am
The problem with this rant is that it’s stock against Taylor Swift, as opposed to specific to the album being reviewed, which very much eschewed and answered the criticisms against Taylor Swift for her lack of maturity. As laid out in the review, it was “Speak Now” where Taylor Swift answered these maturity criticisms in a very direct manner, and put many of her critics in their place. It displayed rather stunning maturity for a 19 year old. It doesn’t mean it’s country, and it doesn’t mean it’s something you have to like. But saying this album approaches life with the mentality of a teenager is to just give an opinion that is uninformed. It’s perhaps more relevant to her later albums ‘Red’ and ‘1989,” if only because they include more silly, catchy pop singles.
July 12, 2023 @ 3:18 am
Yeah, Speak Now is a very odd album to level this rant at.
Her first couple of albums were smarter and sadder than they had to be…but this is the first one that was properly good, cover-to-cover, in large part because it wasn’t focused on HS drama!
It’s a far sight from traditional country by any means…but Speak Now is what pop country should be.
July 11, 2023 @ 9:43 am
There’s always been bubblegum pop music recorded by teenagers and people in their early 20s.
Not just now, not just ten years ago, but as long as there has been recorded music.
To think that’s the fault of Taylor Swift is missing a lot of music history.
There’s also always been low quality popular music.
You’re projecting your preferences onto reality.
July 11, 2023 @ 2:41 pm
Little Stevie Wonder became Stevie Wonder. Michael Jackson left his brothers in the dust. The Beatles certainly transcended .. Well, everything.
July 11, 2023 @ 9:51 am
Country music is the music of the people. That means it’s meant to be relatable for the listener, regardless of age. For you, songs about HS romance and heartbreak may not be relatable. But similarly, for young people in HS or college, songs about divorce or alcoholism or any of the other many tropes of country music may not be very relatable. But is it really fitting to make a dividing line between “adult” country and “juvenile” country? Or instead, can we just realize that there’s place for both on country radio?
There will always be songs you don’t like within the genre of country music that you do. Why can’t you just include these “juvenile” country songs among those songs that you don’t like, even while admitting they ARE country music and belong on country radio stations?
Of course I’m narrowing the conversation here to country music, this being a country music website and all, but there’s no reason you can’t generalize this conversation to pop or hip hop or any other genre you choose. Not to say there isn’t or shouldn’t still be some idea of teen pop, the type of music that plays on the Disney channel, but are we going to force Olivia Rodrigo to sing about getting her driver’s license and dealing with a breakup in HS exclusively on such channels when it’s overall extremely popular music? Even if you don’t find it relatable, that doesn’t mean you can’t consider it to be good music worth listening to.
The problem with music is when artists start becoming disingenuous to themselves, not to their listeners. It’s trends like 46 y/o Luke Bryan singing about hooking up and partying on the beach all day that are bad for music. It’s not bad for music to have teenagers making quality music that deals with things that are personal for them. I’d feel just as uncomfortable listening to an 18 y/o singing about cheating on his wife as I would listening to Luke Bryan singing about the aforementioned things. If you don’t like the music made by teenagers / young adults, that’s understandable, but just don’t listen to it. Obviously being in the streaming era makes it very easy for you to avoid that.
I agree that not just anyone can create music, but that’s because not everyone is talented enough as a singer, songwriter, instrument player, etc. That’s not because there should be some age minimum in order to create popular music.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:23 am
“It’s trends like 46 y/o Luke Bryan singing about hooking up and partying on the beach all day that are bad for music.”
Was going to make this exact point myself. THIS is the problem, not songs that happen to appeal to teenagers.
But again, this specific album does not have “Love Story” on it, or “We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together” or “Shake It Off.” I’m not saying there isn’t some younger viewpoints shared on it, but this specific album showed surprising maturity from a 19-year-old.
July 12, 2023 @ 2:25 am
Change the lyrics to include Lake Shasta instead of “the beach” and allude to sex by saying “spent all night long on the floor”, then it’s mature.
July 15, 2023 @ 5:52 am
Virtually all of her country chart hits are broken heart songs or relationship adjacent. In a sense, that’s as country as it gets.
July 12, 2023 @ 3:19 am
The bit about teenagers cheating on their wives is a great point…and it’s why I never really vibed with Colter Wall, early on.
July 12, 2023 @ 6:20 am
Huh?
July 13, 2023 @ 6:08 am
Kid was 21 years old when his first LP came out. 13 Silver Dollars was great, but the rest felt a bit like a kid dress up.
July 11, 2023 @ 9:56 am
Would you have made the same argument against LeAnn Rimes and Tanya Tucker, who both even younger than Taylor Swift when they first started making country hits
Were songs like Blue and Delta Dawn only intended for teenagers or is it possible that maybe teenagers can make music for everyone, just like everyone else
July 11, 2023 @ 10:20 am
Johnny Cash – “Ballad of a Teenage Queen”
Marty Robbins – “White Sport Coat (and a Pink Carnation)”
July 12, 2023 @ 12:31 pm
Webb Pierce – “Teenage Boogie”
Burl Ives – “Call Me Mr. In- Between”.
July 15, 2023 @ 5:56 am
I would have loved an old -school hip-hop album from Burl Ives.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:17 am
“And frankly, I believe Taylor Swift helped usher in this bizarre signal shift in the music world, in which, and from which was born this misconception that as long as you get the right people to help you, people will want to listen to whatever is on your mind, set to Music.”
I agree with this paragraph but I would argue that Swift ushered in an era where marketing and persona overwhelmed singing and music videos. Her rise was based more on the idea that she was one of her many fans despite dating a Kennedy and living in mansions. Her marketing skills are impressive. Grant it, her target demographic is easily maneuvered by such tactics but she built this aura where otherwise rational people are indoctrinated into the Cult of Taylor. We live now in the age of persona cults where groups of people cut away by traditional cultural keystones now gravitate to sports teams and celebrities to fill that void. We have made false deities of humans.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:36 am
And maybe if those cultural keystones hadn’t “cut away” so many people, there wouldn’t need to be a Taylor Swift to fill that void. That she is doing it by being an emblem of personal, professional, and creative empowerment for a generation of listeners is, on the whole, a net positive.
Taste is subjective, but the phenomenon surrounding her is real (even if she isn’t as “everywoman” as she makes herself out to be)
July 11, 2023 @ 11:50 am
The cultural keystones didn’t cut away people. They were systematically attacked so as to be removed from society.
July 11, 2023 @ 12:27 pm
Thats not how I and those who have been alienated by traditional culture see it. But we can agree to disagree.
July 15, 2023 @ 5:54 am
Luke Bryan says he keeps getting older, but Spring Break girls stay the same age.
July 11, 2023 @ 1:42 pm
While you’ve made some undeniably valid points, one thing you are failing to address is that Taylor’s music has grown as she has. She is singing more adult and more mature songs. And if you were willing to give her music a chance, I think you’d be surprised as to what she has to offer.
No, it still isn’t country, but as Trigger has often said here, just because something isn’t country doesn’t mean it isn’t good. Listen to her albums “folklore” and “evermore” and try to tell me she hasn’t matured as a songwriter and as an individual.
And listen to “All Too Well” (especially the ten minute version) and tell me it isn’t a freaking masterpiece.
July 11, 2023 @ 3:42 pm
I’m going to just respond at the end of this thread, rather than try and rig but everyone individually. I don’t think it makes a difference how much Taylor Swift has improved. I can start doing my business in the bathroom after a week of doing it on the floor but unless I clean up the mess I made on the floor the whole house is still going to stink. And that’s where we stand with country music. Taylor Swift may have personally owned up to being a pop artist and deliberately cut ties with country music publicly, and made a show of faith to stop interloping in the genre. The problem is that her success within the genre before she publicly cut ties with it lead for a lot of imitators, who are still in the genre.
Whether or not Taylor Swift, personally, as an individual, is still doing damage to country music isn’t the point. Taylor Swift the institution is very much damaging country music to this day. We are going on two decades Now of people Putting similar stuff on country radio. Most of it worse than her stuff.
This is why gatekeepers are so important.
And there is this big misconception that folk songs are Kidsongs, folk songs are songs of the people. The reason we all heard them as kids is because they were everywhere, they are a fabric of cultural identity. Oh, Susanna isn’t a kid song. It’s an essential part of American musical history.
And songs about teenagers can still be for adults. The problem is that when you take something that is specifically intended For useful consumption and pass it off as intended for adult consumption.
And yes. I am bitter about the damage that’s been done to country music. Because I used to be able to say that I liked country music in public. Now I can’t even bother because it’s going to lead to a huge argument just like this one about what is and isn’t country music. So I don’t say anything at all about liking country music to anybody for any reason in any context. Because nobody understands where I’m coming from anymore. I shouldn’t have to specify that I like country music before 1989. I shouldn’t have to specify Country music, but not that kind of country music. It’s not worth it. So yes, I am a little uptight about it.
And yes, I realize that it all isn’t Taylor Swift the individual personally doing things. The problem is that the phenomena resulting from Taylor Swift the institution, has led to this.
If Taylor Swift, the individual grew up and showed her critics, she was really up to the job, great. If she put in the practice and stop singing off pitch, good for her, props for the commitment. If she’s actually up to the job, you know what’s the harm. Because she’s honest about what she’s doing. The problem is that along the way, she created a vacuum effect that made a huge mess in her week that, so far as I know, she has not personally addressed. Not that I think we should complain to Taylor Swift every time Thomas Rhett wins Entertainer of the year, but it’s the principle of the thing
We have to acknowledge that the primary reason people like Thomas Rhett even started succeeding is because Taylor Swift succeeded.
And the problem is that water is still coming through that hole, there is still a problem.
July 11, 2023 @ 5:23 pm
I have no idea what you are talking about. Taylor Swift’s country career is much more unicorn than you are saying. She came and went and left a vacuum that really was never filled. Her copycats and proteges are more Olivia Rodrigo and don’t really exist in the country space (although I feel like Morgan Wallen is dipping into an early Taylor Swift male version now). Thomas Rhett and the like are more an evolution of the Keith Urbans and Kenny Chesneys of the world. I dont think you can draw any line from Taylor Swift to bro country other than marking Borchetta as the common thread. If you see links from Swift to people like Kelsea Ballerini or Maren Morris or any other American Idol flash in the pan, I don’t see what you are seeing. None of these people are “doing” Taylor Swift. And really that all comes down to songwriting.
July 11, 2023 @ 6:21 pm
*clap clap clap*
This, 100%
July 12, 2023 @ 3:25 am
I wouldn’t say Morgan Wallen’s got an “Early Taylor Swift” vibe at all – after all, Swift writes her own songs.
The “Taylor Swift for 20-something guys” lane is pretty firmly taken by Zach Bryan, haha!
July 12, 2023 @ 3:26 am
You’re using so many words, when all you’re saying is:
“This isn’t for me. Therefore, it shouldn’t exist.”
July 12, 2023 @ 7:47 pm
Cool Lester Smooth summed up that diatribe that fuzzy posted perfectly. “I don’t like it, make it end.” Fuzzy, sorry you didn’t date anyone in HS. Other people did, and therefore, they related to her music. Never did it for me, as I was never a teenage girl, but I don’t think all music should be tailored for me.
July 12, 2023 @ 4:15 am
“And songs about teenagers can still be for adults. The problem is that when you take something that is specifically intended For useful consumption and pass it off as intended for adult consumption.”
Aren’t adults capable of deciding what music they like and want to listen too? Teenagers, too, for that matter.
July 12, 2023 @ 5:36 am
Even if we take your comment at face value, you’re blaming the downfall of popular country on albums made by a girl when she was 15, 18 and 19. If a teenage girl can upend a genre and send it into a 2 decade tailspin.. was the genre really on stable footing to begin with?
If Taylor Swift never released a single country album, Scott Bruscetta would have found someone else (or a group of others) to do the same thing.
______
I don’t take your comment at face value though. To me, Florida Georgia Line is was the catalyst for pop-country’s demise. Listen to early albums from Luke Bryan, Jason Aldean, Blake Shelton… and then listen to their albums after FGL.
FGL caused the whole genre to chase the bro-country fad. And once the fad was done, the genre was lost. The top artists were now too old. The new artists didn’t have original sounds or fanbases. That’s how we got stuck in that weird Sam Hunt/Thomas Rhett metro phase (which was much worse than bro-country to listen to.)
The cycle is now has mostly come full circle with Luke Combs and Morgan Wallen having a more organic sound akin to the 2000-2010 era. There are still remnants of bro-country and the metro bullshit out there though.
July 12, 2023 @ 7:53 am
100% on FGL, and the late great Peter Cooper agrees with you. In his country music class, he ended his first lecture by playing Cruise for the students, which at the time had just broken the record for most weeks at number 1 on the country charts. He basically played it for laughs as a jarring juxtaposition to the previous 90 minutes of introduction to the sound and history of country music.
July 12, 2023 @ 8:02 am
Tom C’s got it right.
July 16, 2023 @ 1:29 pm
Mr fuzzy, I really want to know what Taylor did to you to know why you hate her so much.
Personally she’s one of my favorite singers and speak now is my favorite album by her
No not pure country but definitely has some “country” aspects.
Because I like this music am I a horrible person? (Not necessarily directed at you, mr fuzzy, tho you do take some shots, but at the people who ruthlessly tear apart Fgl fans) music is subjective, as some people on this site seem to forget at times. Trigger provides an unbiased opinion more than 90% of the time, but he is about the only person I have found like that. Good article trig. interesting comment mr fuzzy.
Blaming the entire downfall of a genre on a 19 year old girl is an interesting opinion( tho I don’t agree with it )
Sorry for lack of punctuation as I did this on my phone.
July 12, 2023 @ 6:38 am
r/Iamverysmart material right here. Maybe even bordering neckbeard levels.
July 12, 2023 @ 8:13 am
I sort of understand your point if I squint a little. I thought some of Taylor Swifts early stuff was really good. I can’t stand Taylor Swift later on and I have never liked Tim McGraw, but her song “Tim McGraw” is a great song that I will listen to every time I hear it. I think she was 16 when she wrote it. Teardrops On My Guitar is another one I will listen to every time I hear it somewhere. Those songs were written and recorded by a teenager. We both agree that just about every bro-country song we hear is written by a team of uninspired writers and recorded by some tight jeans 45 year old man singing about 20 year old girls. Modern day old man Conway Twittys! It is creepy when Luke Bryan sings about that stuff. Twenty-something Zack Bryan seems a million times more genuine when he is writing about lost love and stuff like that.
July 11, 2023 @ 9:42 am
Before there was Florida Georgia Line, there was Taylor Swift. Before there was Taylor Swift, there was Shania Twain. It’s all where you draw the line….Shania was my line.
I met somebody once you said that before there were these people, there was Johnny Cash…
July 12, 2023 @ 7:49 am
I don’t know how to tell you this, but the 80s were full of garbage country music.
July 15, 2023 @ 5:45 am
I reflexively want to make the same rant, but that would be like raging against the 1998 Yankees. Sometimes you just have to stand there and tip your cap to talent. That’s what made it possible for me to accept the kid as a legitimate force in country at the time, even though her voice as a teenager had the range of a first baseman.
July 11, 2023 @ 9:59 am
While maybe only very tenuously related to the topic, Cody Canada’s recent re-recording of “Soul Gravy” is really, really good (maybe even better than the original). And that is coming from someone who hated the idea and didn’t want to like it.
Hat’s off to artists who had the foresight to never let go of their music (hello BJ Barham).
July 11, 2023 @ 9:59 am
The best Taylor Swift album still doesn’t equal average.
I miss the SCM when Trigger wasn’t playing the castle defender for Princess Taylor.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:17 am
There are many who hold this false notion that Saving Country Music perpetually just started covering mainstream country and pop country music recently, when in truth I’ve been covering the mainstream the entire time. I reviewed “Speak Now” back when it was originally released—13 years ago. That was also less than two years after Saving Country Music started.
TONS of folks have asked me to review these Taylor Swift reissues. What I told them is I would say something when she released “Speak Now,” because it’s her best album, and the one I’m most familiar with so I can speak upon it with authority. That’s what I’ve done.
July 11, 2023 @ 11:41 am
That is your opinion and you are entitled to it. She may not be country and she may have never been country, but to deny her songwriting talent is just ignorant. To deny the progress she’s made as a songwriter is ignorant. To deny her talent as a singer is ignorant.
You don’t virtually break the Ticketmaster website without having some level of talent.
You may not like her, but the woman is undeniably talented and trying to deny that just makes you look bitter.
July 11, 2023 @ 11:54 am
You can write the same comment about Luke Bryan, FGL, Kane Brown, Maren Morris, Jason Aldean, and countless others from popular music regarding their success.
Criticism doesn’t equal bitterness.
July 11, 2023 @ 1:29 pm
No, actually, I couldn’t write the same comment about them because none of them have broken Ticketmaster.
And your comments don’t equal criticism. Your comments equal pure bitterness.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:48 pm
You are not really comparing Taylor Swift to Jason Aldean, right? Because that might be one of the dumbest things I have ever read in my 34 years of life.
July 12, 2023 @ 3:28 am
Leaving aside the fact that none of those people have ever broken Ticketmaster…none of them write their own songs, either.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:05 am
“Artists should own their own music.”
Why? Studios and executives play a large role in the production of good and bad music. What about the session musicians? Shouldn’t they have a cut too? None of these singers are making the music by themselves.
And guess what? Artists can own their musical rights. Swift, like countless others, chose to sign with a major studio because she wanted the fastest shortcut to fame and success. That is their right to do, but to act like the studios are wrong (as many people have alleged) for not selling or giving back the rights is pure naivety.
It is a business. Taylor Swift is much a business as Big Machine. That is something her cult of fans refuse to recognize.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:13 am
CountryKnight,
I posted a whole paragraph giving the rather heterodox opinion that Taylor Swift is not really in a position to complain about owning her own masters, and how if it wasn’t for Scott Borchetta, she likely wouldn’t even have the career that she currently enjoys. I said that whole thing. Don’t pull quote me and act like I didn’t make a concerted effort to give greater context to her battle to own her own music, which resulted in these re-released albums.
That said, I do think all artists should own their own music, and I think that’s a reality that is coming more and more true as time goers on.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:23 am
Trigger,
I pulled that quote to speak regarding the overall movement.
That is well and good, and I am not impacted either way on ownership. Far as I am concerned, both the artists and studios don’t care about fans, just making money. But the studios have just as much right to the music as the artists do. If the artists want to own the music, self-produce, or arrange for a contract that allows it.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:39 am
I think the issue comes from the fact that at the time of the sale, Taylor was financially able to buy back her masters and they weren’t even offered to her in the first place as a courtesy. “its a business” is often used as a blanket excuse any time someone wants to worship profit making at all costs, but believe it or not there used to be something called “ethics” in business.
July 11, 2023 @ 11:58 am
It is not a matter of ethics. Taylor’s masters are a financially lucrative asset. Why would any company offer them up unless they were desperate for short-term income?
It would be unethical if the company ignored a provision in her contract that stated the masters would be available for purchase at a certain time.
No one is worshipping profit. If you were in charge of Big Machine, you wouldn’t be giving away those masters either.
July 11, 2023 @ 12:47 pm
Nowhere did I state that Big machine should have “given” her the masters or even cut a sweetheart deal for them. That Taylor Swift has access to capital (which is not the same as saying she had the cash to pay for it herself) – and lots of it – should not be a point we are debating here. She was cut out of the process from the get go and then when she said she should be able to bid she was told she had to sign up for 6 more albums with a company run by someone who produced a music video that showed sexually violent imagery of someone who looked a lot like her. If you think that the process was “fair” to her, then I can only hope you end up on the business end of a “fair” deal like that yourself someday.
July 12, 2023 @ 4:12 am
There is no reason musicians shouldn’t own their music, at least at some point after the label has recouped their investment and made some amount of profit. Taylor merely fought, and basically won, the same battle Prince fought back in the day.
July 11, 2023 @ 2:05 pm
I believe “it’s just business” was Michael Jackson’s response to Paul McCartney after buying up a good chunk of The Beatles’ catalog….
July 11, 2023 @ 12:22 pm
You can’t have it both ways, CountryKnight. You can’t justify an artist not owning their own music by saying “it’s a business,” while also simultaneously complaining about the corporatization of music and that independent artists don’t get a fair shot because they don’t have the power of a label promoting them to radio. Isn’t that a “business” as well?
July 11, 2023 @ 12:22 pm
“What about the session musicians?”… I’m gonna go off topic for a second here, but you left an opening and I’m going dive right on through it.
This has always driven me crazy. Writers in Nashville often use the phrase “word for a third”, meaning if they can contribute a couple of words or a line to a lyric, they can often get a third of the publishing. Something similar should apply to session musicians when they contribute musical ideas to the song. These tune are – by and large – so simplistic harmonically and melodically the only thing that sets one song apart from the next are the hooks and arrangements, 90% of which are contributed by the session musicians. I heard recently that in Europe session musicians get a cut of the publishing. I don’t know if that’s true, but they absolutely should.
Anywho, back to Taylor Swift…
July 11, 2023 @ 10:07 am
I can say with all honesty I had never heard a single Taylor Swift song until a few minutes ago. Couldnt pick her out of a lineup either- I’m pretty good at ignoring pop and celebrity both. But I gave Dear John an honest listen with an open mind. Meh. Turned it off at the 90 second mark. Sounded like sappy chick music. Dont get me wrong- many of my favorite singers are female, but they have a more universal appeal. This sounded tailor made (no pun intended) for teenage girls. Thanks for confirming what I suspected.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:25 am
Maybe you should listen to the whole song.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:41 am
I’m not a teenager anyone and I’ve never been a girl, and yet I’ve never had a problem with listening to music made by someone with that perspective, or music that’s targeted at that demographic
Songs don’t have to be made for you in order for you to understand them
Dear John isn’t even that difficult to relate to. Anyone who’s had a partner jerk them around, string them along, gaslight them, or manipulate them should be able grasp the sentiment of the song. And if you can’t relate to it, you can at least empathize with it.
You should probably listen to the whole song before criticizing it
July 11, 2023 @ 11:22 am
I dont see why. We all emotionally connect with the music we like and dont connect with the music we dont. Im sure there are types far different from this site- hip hop, death metal, something that rubs you the wrong way. You cant fault people for the sounds that appeal (or dont appeal to them). No thanks- I dont like this sound one bit. Enjoy it- power to you! It would be a pretty lame world if we all liked the same stuff.
Interestingly when people made comments about the On The Boat Again piece a couple weeks back no one faulted them for disliking it in 90 seconds and turning it off that quickly- Why the hypocrisy? Just because you like this one and not that one?
July 11, 2023 @ 12:00 pm
Pretty much.
It is popular here when Trigger is bashing a song to write “listened to 30 seconds. Turn it off.” And it is a sentiment that is never rebuffed unless it is a Swift song.
July 11, 2023 @ 1:33 pm
For someone who can’t stand Taylor Swift, you sure are commenting a lot on an article about her.
July 12, 2023 @ 7:15 am
‘On the boat again’ was at least funny in a bad dad-joke way. And it paid some homage to an actual country song. Much better than these two songs.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:10 am
Trigger,
Please quit acting like Swift’s move to pop was based on any sort of altruistic behavior. It was a pure business decision. She made the move because she couldn’t afford any lingering ties to country music if she wanted to dominate the pop scene and because her brand was big enough to cut ties with country. Hunt and Morris simply aren’t.
I miss Adrian’s comments on Swift. His analysis of her was always insightful and top-notch.
It had nothing to do with music integrity. Because if she had musical integrity, she wouldn’t have spent years pumping pop music on the country airwaves.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:29 am
Taylor Swift moved to pop because there was more money and fame there, clearly. But, she could have just declared herself pop or started releasing pop albums, and moved on. Instead, she provided specific statements that said that it was important to be honest with the public, herself, and her fans about the style of her music to avoid unnecessary conflict. She then went on to battle Scott Borchetta, who still wanted to release some of her singles to country radio, and told him “No, I’m a pop star.”
This is what we’ve been asking for artists like Sam Hunt, Maren Morris, Kelsea Ballerini, and Walker Hays to do. They don’t do it. Taylor Swift did. She deserves credit for that, even if the primary reason was commercial concerns as opposed to ethical ones.
July 11, 2023 @ 11:57 am
But they also pay the price for not doing it?
Kane Brown does double-releases, with some singles specifically sent to pop, but they never go much higher than Top 10-15 on the pop chart and part of that is because he’s still viewed as a country star. “Be Like That” had exceptional callouts and “Thank God” sold really well and was a clear pop song, so there’s no explanation for those songs not doing much better at pop radio.
Body Like A Back Road was one of the most recognizable songs in all of music when it came out, and it didn’t hit #1 at pop either. As much as it pains me to say (since the song is so awful), “Fancy Like” was much bigger in terms of cultural and commercial impact than its pop airplay suggests.
And we’re even seeing that with Morgan Wallen and Luke Combs. Morgan Wallen is the biggest recording artist in all of American music right now, his album dominantly ranks as the year’s best-performing, Last Night is a pop song that has spent 13 weeks atop the Hot 100, and radio has been dragging its feet. There is zero reason why that song isn’t already #1 on the pop airplay chart (let alone hot adult contemporary) – other than the fact that it’s being viewed as “not pop” by a segment of pop radio programmers.
“Fast Car” literally IS a pop-rock/hot adult contemporary song, and it’s also been smoking every major pop hit on the charts, yet it’s not even near the Top 10 at pop radio. The only explanation is that “Luke Combs is a country artist, so we have to treat this as a fringe/crossover song.”
So, yes, establishing yourself as a “pop artist” is absolutely in your commercial best interest if you want to get maximum support from pop gatekeepers. I mean, we even saw this with Taylor herself – her “Red” singles were nowhere near as massive as the songs from “1989” even though they came from the same big-name pop producers and had absolutely no sonic connection to country.
July 11, 2023 @ 12:08 pm
Those statements were part of the marketing to sell herself as “authentic.” It was typical Taylor marketing. “I am the real deal.” “I am the girl with the teardrops on the guitar.” “I am just like you.”
It was her version of bro-country marketing.
She battled Borchetta not over musical integrity but because she knew she couldn’t afford to be tainted as “country.”
Those artists don’t make the move because they know they would be marginal players in the pop world. They, like Swift, are making commercial decisions. Swift just happened to be popular enough to officially change genres because she fit the pop demographic and image.
Giving someone credit for making a smart financial decision is hilarious. Swift was risking nothing but officially converting to pop. It was a surefire move.
July 11, 2023 @ 12:41 pm
Taylor Swift benefits none from a marketing standpoint by specifically calling her music not country. That is why Scott Borchetta disagreed with the decision, and wanted to push her music to country anyway. Better to push her music to pop AND country.
“Swift was risking nothing but officially converting to pop. It was a surefire move. “
Are you sure about that? Ask fellow Big Machine-signed act The Band Perry.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:44 am
“Red” was the only album of hers that was predominantly a pop record that got promoted to country. Yes, her earlier efforts would best be described as pop/country but pop-leaning country has been around since the 1950s and has its place in the genre.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:18 am
I have to wonder if writing about love and breakups is low hanging fruit or if it is just easier to do. I know that with grunge, it was quite easy for some of those dudes to write about depression and angst.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:32 am
Thought this was a great review and I’ve always loved this album the most for the reasons you say. Really well done. I will echo disappointment a bit at changing the lyrics of better than revenge. Same as picture to burn, to me the appeal of Taylor swifts early stuff is it sounds like a teenage girl writing music for a teenage girl to sing, instead of a 45 year old man faking that voice. The immaturity was the point and the appeal in some ways.
But yeah great write up here.
July 11, 2023 @ 12:15 pm
The Picture To Burn lyric change came during its original release, and it makes sense. Even though the original line isn’t actually homophobic when you break it down, it ultimately involves weaponizing sexuality as a mic-dropping act of revenge. Plus, it is juxtaposed with insults like “obsessive and crazy,” which just feels in poor taste. Society moved past this kind of thing.
But the line change in Better Than Revenge is awful, and I’m not sure why Trigger thinks it works. It might eliminate the overt sl0t-shaming vibe of the original lyric, but it loses the other, more biting half of the insult (that she’s an unsuccessful actress). Plus, the whole song is still about getting revenge on THE GIRL, which means that for all her talk, she’s still blaming Camilla Belle for stealing Joe Jonas as opposed to blaming Joe Jonas for being unfaithful. Which is still very anti-modern feminism. So she got rid of the most memorable line, thus weakening the song, but did nothing to change its “problematic” element.
Based on her current personas and political stances, the reality is that she should have re-written the song to blame the guy rather than the girl.
July 11, 2023 @ 12:39 pm
I honestly don’t have a strong opinion on the lyrical change either way. When I say “it works,” I basically mean it rhymes. Since there is a lot of interest in this album, fans and the media are searching for discussion points, and I’ll leave it to others to debate the lyrical change ad naueum, which they have. My brain gets tired by over-analyzing stuff that basically comes down to semantics, though I appreciate you detailing the finer points.
July 11, 2023 @ 10:33 am
I’m waiting for “In Search of a Song (Taylor’s Version),” Rainbow Stew Live (Taylor’s Version)” and a cover of Jill Sobule’s “I Kissed a Girl (Taylor’s Version).” 🙂
July 11, 2023 @ 10:36 am
Geez. Will someone please tell me when this woman will freaking GO AWAY!
July 11, 2023 @ 12:25 pm
She ain’t going anywhere for a long, long time.
July 11, 2023 @ 12:35 pm
She’s easily the biggest star in all of music, so not anytime soon.
July 12, 2023 @ 3:34 pm
Unfortunately 🙁
July 11, 2023 @ 5:15 pm
You could’ve just not clicked on the article. That’s what most people do when they’re not interested in something.
July 12, 2023 @ 3:35 pm
But I was interested. Interested in her getting swept into the dust bin of history.
July 12, 2023 @ 7:52 pm
And you thought commenting about an album on a country music website was gonna do that? Damn. You have a high opinion of your comments.
July 13, 2023 @ 10:59 am
Uh no. I thought that commenting on a country music website would share my opinion about her. Seems that you’re the one that thinks my comment has direct, real-world impact. Thanks for the complement!
July 13, 2023 @ 3:49 am
That’s not gonna happen. She’s going to be remembered as the biggest female pop star of all time.
July 11, 2023 @ 11:20 am
Country music has always had a pop side, be it Anne Murray or Kenny Rogers, a lot of Glen Campbell’s stuff, and even mid-career Ray Price and mid-early career Marty Robbins. Nothing wrong with it — it’s a big tent. I’ve always enjoyed Taylor’s country-pop; in fact, “Fearless” remains among my top 100 or so favorite songs of all-time.
I gave SN(TV) a listen, and it’s enjoyable. The more mature vocals really give some of these songs a new shine. I keep an open mind when it comes to music, and really don’t mind when Taylor pops up on my shuffle between Cash and Haggard. Country-pop has a place in the tent.
July 13, 2023 @ 7:17 am
But the thing is, this is pure pop. It’s not country by any definition (with the exception of maybe “Mean”). And that’s not a bad thing. There is plenty of great music that isn’t country, but even on its original release this shouldn’t have been labeled as country.
So, I can understand the frustration people have over that.
But she is clearly defining herself as pop, now. And I’ve always tried to look at her music through a pop lens and that is what has allowed me to enjoy it. She is a gifted songwriter and singer and I am not ashamed to admit I am a huge fan.
July 11, 2023 @ 12:49 pm
I will say two things;
Taylor Swift is an undeniably talented singer/songwriter.
Taylor Swift is everything wrong with pop culture and pop music, bar none.
July 11, 2023 @ 12:54 pm
“Garth Brooks is the king of selling consumers the same song twice (or three or four or five times), and even he must be sitting back and salivating over how one can pull off a similar scheme to Swift.”
Brooks owns his masters; he has for decades. So there’s no reason for him to salivate or rerecord his albums. Read Jimmy Bowen’s book on how Garth pulled that one off. Capital Records Nashville was almost destroyed because of his greed and need for control. Talk to the artists on the labels whose careers were cut short because all the money had to be diverted to the Garth deal.
Back when Taylor, a spoiled rich kid, signed her deal, most labels with backing were dumping millions of dollars into new artists (that’s per artist). Maybe 1 in 10 hit. It’s a business, and that money needs to be recouped. Swift had a chance to buy her masters, but didn’t want to pay what they were valued at. Borchetta made a business move, and good for him. He gambled with Big Machine, and lost money on a lot of artists that didn’t break, and also did well.
I think re-recorded albums are lame (and rarely come close to matching the innocence or inspiration of the original). It’s about money. How much is enough? For many, it’s never enough.
Except for the song “Carolina,” Swift’s music has never moved me in any way. It sounds calculated and hollow (to me). But there’s no denying how powerful it is to millions of fans, and that’s who buys it and enjoys it, and that’s the bottom line, really.
July 11, 2023 @ 6:04 pm
One of the (many) unfortunate consequences of “Stan culture” is that fans are becoming too caught up in the recording artist and insufficiently appreciative of the people behind the scenes. Of course Borchetta isn’t the sole reason Taylor was successful (if he was, he would have had more success stories like hers), but he — as well as the entire business, marketing, and creative teams behind her — contributed. To act like every single person BUT the artist is a leech unentitled to their fair share of credit and profit is a real shame.
And this isn’t just an issue for the business types; it also affects creatives. I’ve seen segments of BTS and K-pop fans getting upset at songwriters celebrating #1s, since it’s not THEIR number one (even though they wrote the song) but BTS’ number one. People simply don’t see today’s music as a “teamwork makes the dream work” situation; it’s “artist deserves all the credit, behind the scenes people should be happy they get their small cut.”
That said, even though Taylor doesn’t need the money and seems to be letting her fanbase exaggerate the extent to which Borchetta and Braun are “villains” here, there’s merit to the re-recording process. The truth is that many young artists ARE taken advantage of when it comes to giving away things like masters (especially artists have to shoulder far more of the promotional burden in today’s social media-driven landscape), and this is a good precedent for either giving them a way to reclaim control retroactively … or creating negotiating leverage upfront to help more artists own their masters from day one.
July 11, 2023 @ 6:27 pm
So many more artists these days have control over their own masters, at least in the country/roots space. It’s in large part due to Thirty Tigers, which allows artists to keep control of their own music, and doesn’t make them sign huge multi album contracts. Even when artists go to major labels now, they can ask to retain their rights through their own publishing company because that’s the deal Thirty Tigers is offering them. This is what guys like Tyler Childers and Zach Bryan have done, and now they can even release albums for others through their deals.
This is a huge sea change since Taylor Swift first came onto the scene. Also, now with the internet and streaming, artists can build huge fan bases before they approach labels, and negotiate better terms. It’s rare these days to see a label dispute with an artist, where they want out of a bad contract, or can’t release the music they want. When Saving Country Music started, they were happening all the time. It’s one of the reasons I founded the site.
July 11, 2023 @ 8:22 pm
Can you explain more about how the rights work when an artist re-records an old album?
July 12, 2023 @ 9:03 am
Well, this probably deserves its own article, but here’s an attempt at a succinct explanation.
Record labels are basically like banks. An artist comes to them wanting to record music, and so they float the money to pay for studio time, a producer, studio players, manufacturing of physical product, promotion of that music to radio, the public, and the press, and so forth, and so on. Since it’s the label paying for those specific recordings, they own them, usually. Then the artist makes royalties off of them, both as a performer, and if it’s their songs, as a songwriter.
If an artist blows up like Taylor Swift did, they may get big enough to be able to pay for all of this stuff themselves. This is one of the reasons labels make artists sign multi-album deals, so in the case of them blowing up, they don’t just jump ship. This is what Swift did with Big Machine, signing (I believe) a five album deal. So even though she didn’t need the “bank” (Big Machine) to pay for everything, she was contractually obligated to continue to work with them, which is fine, because they also handle a lot of the stuff an artist doesn’t want to.
But when Swift walked away from Big Machine, Big Machine still controlled all of her “Masters,” meaning the actual recordings of the actual songs.
However, anyone can record any song they want, regardless of who wrote it, thanks to the 1st Amendment. This includes the original artist if they so choose. So in this case, Taylor Swift re-records her original Big Machine songs in hopes they will supplant the original versions so she now de facto takes back control over those recordings. The original recordings will still be out there, but having told her fans what happened, they are more likely to consume “Taylor’s version,” devaluing the original Master recordings in the marketplace.
Taylor Swift is not the first to do this by far. But she is absolutely the most successful. Usually these re-recordings just get tossed aside by fans because our brains latch onto the original recordings, and don’t like the new ones. It’s like New Coke. But Swift appears to have struck the balance between the new and the familiar, and these re-recordings are becoming massive success stories all unto themselves. “Speak Now (Taylor’s Version)” is the biggest album released in 2023 so far, at least after five days.
July 12, 2023 @ 9:44 am
I believe she also had to wait a certain amount of time to start this process, if I’m recalling correctly a comment she made when announcing the re-recording process.
July 11, 2023 @ 1:26 pm
I am not a Taylor fan, but anyone that denies her songwriting skills is simply disingenuous. From what I’ve heard she also puts on one hell of a show. Ya don’t have to like someone’s music to appreciate the talent. I think some people make hating Taylor Swift a part of their personality & that’s just lame.
July 13, 2023 @ 10:51 am
I must say that a week ago, I sounded like all the snotty commenters here criticizing Taylor Swift. I accompanied my wife to a Taylor Swift concert over the weekend though and it 100% changed my opinion of Swift. I feel like I “get” it now.
July 13, 2023 @ 11:19 am
my sister is a big fan & also has pretty good taste in music. she said her show is one of the best she has seen. we are all taking a vacation to Scotland & England next summer & are going to see her in Edinburgh. I am actually looking forward to seeing her show.
July 11, 2023 @ 1:29 pm
I love early TS and not ashamed of it.
Personally I always thought Red was her ultimate album. Yes, quite pop/rock driven, but more mature and still lyrically driven.
Anyway, i think TS has pulled off one of the best marketing scams ever.
First, create a moral high ground reason for re-recording, 2nd, go back and fix anything she didn’t like or doesn’t fit her current persona. 3rd, resell it.
So she has managed to repackage an item, make her back catalogue seem more polished, and get away with it and with everyone’s sympathy.
Even hipsters aren’t saying “the original is best”.
Very smart girl.
And hey, good luck to her. I just thought i’d share my thoughts.
July 11, 2023 @ 6:26 pm
“go back and fix anything she didn’t like or doesn’t fit her current persona. 3rd, resell it.”
She changed one line in one song. That’s literally the only thing she “fixed.”
July 11, 2023 @ 7:33 pm
You were there in the studio when she rerecorded the albums? I guarantee they fixed lots of things (which is normal and makes sense). Changing a line in a song is different than fixing things that the average fan boy/girl wouldn’t notice.
July 11, 2023 @ 9:46 pm
I didn’t say change it majorly.
Admittedly I haven’t heard this version of Speak Now, but I did a comparison with Red and thought she made it a bit more polished and pop. Which will sound better to her current fans, and that would make sense to her now. Lots of artists would wish their earlier records appealed to current fans
Anyway, my favourite version of Better than Revenge is on the Speak Now live album with the sweet as twin rock guitar solo. I saw that tour and it absolutely ripped (better than Jeremy Pinnell 😉 )
July 11, 2023 @ 2:30 pm
Agreed that this album is a step up in quality from most of her albums. I’d still contend that if Red did not include the Shellback tracks (22, Trouble, Never Getting Back Together), it’d be her best album in her catalog. Folklore, and to a degree Evermore, was also an outstanding album.
It amazing to see her have a bit of a comeback. From 2017-2020, it seemed like she had fallen out of favor with new music. Now she’s the undisputed biggest act in music.
It’s also impressive to see her stretch her boundaries a bit while keeping the same level of songwriting. Yes, all of her albums are squarely in the pop genre, but they’ve touched pop-country, indie/pop-folk, regular Top 40 etc. We could do much worse for a top act in music.
July 12, 2023 @ 3:38 am
I’d honestly take evermore over folklore – felt it was far more lyric driven than the latter, which occasionally fell into being twee and “a mood.”
July 11, 2023 @ 2:56 pm
Little Stevie Wonder became Stevie Wonder. Michael Jackson left his brothers in the dust. The Beatles certainly transcended .. Well, everything.
July 11, 2023 @ 3:35 pm
Tim McGraw probably gets a kick out of the fact that the first time the world heard of Taylor Swift, she was singing about being a fan-girl of Tim McGraw.
July 11, 2023 @ 4:23 pm
I always enjoyed Taylor’s brand of pop-country in the late 2000s—early 2010s. Granted, I was in the age demographic for her music at the time, but I can still enjoy songs from her debut album, Fearless, Speak Now, and Red even as an adult. I even thought “Betty” and “No Body, No Crime” were good songs.
July 11, 2023 @ 5:12 pm
Aaron Watson did a great cover od “Never Grow Up” with his daughter that I highly reccomend
July 11, 2023 @ 8:23 pm
I liken Taylor Swift to Olivia Newton John. Both started off as country pop, then transitioned fully into pop. The practice of re-recording her albums because her original masters are not in her control is both petty and appropriate. She may not own them, but she is reclaiming them in this fashion. History has shown her to be a strong, fiercely powerful woman who lets nothing stop her from her ideals. She has this knack of turning her heartbreaks from broken relationships into billion selling songs.
Personally, I have never been a fan of her music and I do wish her continued success in her endeavors. she did the right move to transition out of country like what Olivia Newton John did. I say this because while they may have started out in country, it didn’t define them as an artist. I respect both for this decision, unlike Shania who calls herself country but has yet to prove it.
July 12, 2023 @ 2:31 am
Taylor Swift not being the world’s greatest singer is such a non-issue. I have heard so many stories of how Kenny Chesney and Dierks Bentley started as terrible singers and continue to use pitch correction tools today.
July 12, 2023 @ 6:47 am
@Trigger what did you think of her re-recording of Fearless? I have to say, I always grew up with the notion how Swift was ‘never country’, but was actually pleasantly surprised by the arrangements on Fearless. Unlike most ‘pop-country’ songs on the radio these days, the songs on Fearless (and even more so her debut album) actually include a lot of traditional country instruments like banjo, fiddle, mandolin and pedal steel. She really captured the essence of small town living on these songs. Frankly, if her first two albums would’ve been released today, I don’t think there would’ve been much fuzz about them being ‘too pop’, although that probably says more about how much country radio has shifted towards electronic pop sounds nowadays.
Speak Now and Red I consider pure pop-rock albums though. Very generic production.
July 12, 2023 @ 8:50 am
When trying to judge re-recordings, I think you really have to be well-versed in the material to pick up on the subtleties between the two versions. I’m just not as intimately familiar with Swift’s first two albums to feel comfortable doing that. I would agree though, the instrumentation on her first two albums is more “country” than “Speak Now” or “Red,” though these are the two albums I’m most familiar with.
July 12, 2023 @ 7:12 am
This stuff sounds like a 19-year old wrote it. Doesn’t sound country either. I missed it the first time around and gave it about 20 seconds this time.
What this has to do with Merle Haggard is beyond my dumb redneck comprehension.
July 12, 2023 @ 7:48 am
Someone mentioned Zach Bryan as a comparison. This confused the hell out of of me. But let’s break down why.
One, most Zach Bryan songs are significantly darker than anything Taylor Swift has written, to my knowledge.
Two, Zach Bryan is from somewhere and writes like it. Taylor Swift is from Pennsylvania apparently, and writes like she’s from nowhere.
Zach Bryan, whatever criticisms you might have, nails the experience of growing up in the rural US Midwest, south or west and the dark shit that can emerge from those environs. Let’s look at “Oklahoma Smokeshow.” The line “them boys are out and they’re angry and they’re looking for blood / in the back of a blue old pickup truck” means something different and pretty specific if you’ve run across ‘the boys’ on a back road or been one of ‘the boys’ yourself, (though maybe looking more for mischief than a fight).
The song also implies that said smokeshow may have died, or will die, due to domestic violence. It’s a murder ballad, a doomed love song and a cautionary tale delivered in a subtle way. The perspective switching to the speaker/narrator’s observation is also brilliant. This is light years beyond “it was timeless” and the garbage cliches from nowhere.
July 13, 2023 @ 6:48 am
Man, I love Zach Bryan, haha!
Precisely because he “nails the experience of growing up in the rural US Midwest, south or west” for 20-something guys as brilliantly and specifically as Taylor Swift’s early stuff captured the experience of being a teenaged girl growing up in the suburbs.
You also seem impressively unfamiliar with Swift’s work, haha – there’s a murder ballad on her previous album!
A lot of y’all seem to really struggle to differentiate between whether music is for you and whether it’s effective at what it is doing.
July 13, 2023 @ 12:52 pm
I looked up said murder ballad. This is a sheltered15-year old girl’s idea of what a revenge murder might be like. It includes the line “smells like infidelity,” a phrase no one anywhere has ever actually said out loud.
Zach’s song references the sad reality of how many women die without being preachy about it. Different universes.
I’m glad Taylor Swift hasn’t had to live through some real dark shit like some people have. God keep her. That doesn’t mean she’s a good songwriter.
If you’re into suburban girl power stuff, you do you. But it isn’t country music and it isn’t worth me getting familiar with.
July 14, 2023 @ 3:34 pm
…dear God.
As someone who saw a Zach Bryan show that definitely happened before you’d ever heard his name…any reply would be wasted effort, given how thoroughly you exemplify my last line.
Good luck in senior year, champ!
July 14, 2023 @ 6:01 pm
Sorry man. I don’t care who saw who/what/where/when.
I will say that I have I known two adult males who were admitted fans of Taylor Swift.
One moved to downtown Portland, OR because his wife wanted him to—she liked the lifestyle and the politics.
Another let his wife sleep with other men. She divorced him.
Now, you may not find anything embarrassing about either of these two situations. And if so, that only speaks to the gulf of understanding between us, and why I might look at these artists a little differently than you do.
July 12, 2023 @ 8:23 am
I’ll fully admit I’ve always had a “soft” spot for Swift’s first 3 or 4 albums.
July 12, 2023 @ 8:50 am
Thanks for making this 60-something not feel creepy for loving “Ours.”
I am stunned that this album gets reviewed before “Whitsitt Chapel” or “Religiously,” though. To me, those albums represent significant shifts in the mainstream and I expected to see you opine on them weeks ago.
July 12, 2023 @ 9:05 am
I may review both of those albums soon. So many albums, so little time.
July 13, 2023 @ 7:49 am
Yet it *is* creepy.
Grown men defending their love of Taylor Swift… Don’t admit this to your friends!
July 13, 2023 @ 11:57 am
Actual “grown men” aren’t embarrassed about liking smart, well-written pop songs, haha.
“People throw rocks at things that shine” is an absolute BAR.
July 13, 2023 @ 12:39 pm
Nah.
Have yourself a good day.
July 13, 2023 @ 1:32 pm
I’m gonna go with Howard and Lester on this. I’m a 38 year old man and I’m unashamed to be a Taylor Swift fan.
July 13, 2023 @ 5:05 pm
Ronnie Dunn’s a few years older than me, and he’s not embarrassed one bit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HrTiD6KliJc
July 13, 2023 @ 7:35 am
I’ve liked everything Taylor has put out, up to and including Midnights.
There, I said it.
July 13, 2023 @ 8:42 am
The thing about her becoming a predominantly pop-oriented artist is that she is making the best, most artistically interesting pop music of anyone out there these days.
Again, totally cool if thats not your taste but I think some people have trouble with the very existence of pop music.
July 13, 2023 @ 12:08 pm
I don’t love the 1989->Lover era…but each of those albums has at least two great songs!
July 13, 2023 @ 8:42 am
The thing about her becoming a predominantly pop-oriented artist is that she is making the best, most artistically interesting pop music of anyone out there these days.
Again, totally cool if thats not your taste but I think some people have trouble with the very existence of pop music.
July 13, 2023 @ 8:43 am
sorry for the double comment. Pleas remove.
July 14, 2023 @ 11:43 am
I’m a huge SCM fan and a huge Swiftie, just wanted to offer a couple points. I saw a video from the recording of Speak Now (the first time) that showed Nathan doing drums on midi – not sure if that was just as they were demoing but was interesting to see.
Also, I always thought Never Grow Up was generally accepted to be about her brother and Mean was about highschool girls.
July 15, 2023 @ 11:02 am
amazing
like this was the last spot on earth where we dont have to hear about this overrated greedy pretentious annoying rich songster
you need to listen to more good music
July 15, 2023 @ 11:16 am
One thing I have always found interesting about the comments on country-pop is we forget that the sound of pop music has changed.
I am a huge lover of traditional country music. And get frustrated over the state of most of the current country music.
However, almost from the beginning of country music, it has mirrored the current sound of pop. Some of the stars that are revered as traditional artists or pure country had hits with songs that were as big on the pop charts, in some cases bigger hits.
Johnny Cash, Patsy Cline, Marty Robbins, Johnny Horton, Roger Miller, Wanda Jackson, Dolly Parton, Willie Nelson, Sonny James, Jim Reeves…these are some examples of artists we would without a doubt call country artists. Yet, they all courted the pop market with success. Hell, even Elvis had songs on the country chart before before becoming the King and his songs still were #1’s on the country chart as well.
The difference? The sound of pop changed. Yes, Taylor was never “country”. But, this album also brought a lot of listeners to country that would not have tuned in otherwise. As has been said already, the songs were all written by her. They are story songs. Songs about her life that a lot of people can and do relate to. I am well over the age of being able to relate to the songs (her age times 2), but compared to a lot of the shit that came out back then (Carrie at her worse, Martina in her bland period, etc) and compared to most of the writing on current country albums (how many f’ing writers are needed to come up with a song now??), it is still better than a chunk of the others. It starts a conversation with passionate views from different perspectives. Most of the music is so boring who the hell cares to even discuss it? Love it or hate it, both are ok to do.
July 22, 2023 @ 8:06 pm
How in the names of Haggard and Jones is ANYTHING to do with this goofy little girl and her electro-pop diary entries relevant to “Saving Country Music”?
And people used to call Alabama too poppy.
How can I wake up from this nightmare?
July 22, 2023 @ 8:13 pm
I think Trigger is strangely sensitive about this silly girl, so he didn’t let one of my previous comments through.
Oh, well. It doesn’t change the fact that Swift is a pop hack without the tinniest iota of country in her: not in sound, not in feeling, and not in authenticity. She simply doesn’t belong in any serious discussion of…well… anything.
July 28, 2023 @ 7:12 am
Taylor is a gifted and talented artist. The one thing that bothers me- this is a bit in the weeds of music biz- is if these new recordings kill sales of the original recordings the musicians of those original sessions will be cut out of new use royalties. I asked one of the players on the original recordings if they were invited to play on these new versions. They were not. They did not sound happy about it.