Big Names Cash In On ‘Third For A Word’ Songwriting Rule
When music fans think about the art of songwriting, they usually want to have a romantic vision of the process–their favorite songwriters sitting down late at night in a dimly lit room, deep in the throes of passion and inspiration. Maybe a candle flickering above a blank piece of paper, with a glass of wine or whiskey to the side, and tears staining the page as they alleviate their heartache by bearing their soul in a song.
In truth, mainstream songwriting more resembles the unappealing aesthetics of industrial food production, especially in Nashville, where legions of songwriters peck away in cubicle farms from 9 to 5 under florescent track lights, trying to manufacture a hit with very formulaic approaches.
The Beatles and Bob Dylan revolutionized everything for rock music back in the day by writing their own songs. The Brill Building in New York once was like a beehive full of hit makers trying to strike gold, but as artists took up their own songwriting duties in the realm of rock and pop, that all fell by the wayside. Except for in Nashville.
Over the last few months there has been a number of intriguing articles about Nashville’s songwriting establishment and culture, that have really helped draw the curtain back and expose just how antiquated, and sometimes how sinister Nashville’s songwriting culture can be.
Read NPR’s detailed breakdown of how a hit is made in Nashville
A great example of the contrast between songwriting approaches is the Rose family of Nashville. Mother Liz Rose is a career non-performing songwriter, and maybe the most important behind-the-scenes person to Taylor Swift’s success. As a single mother of three, she took the young songstress under her wing and helped pen many of her biggest hits. Though not a household name like Swift, Liz co-wrote seven of the songs on Taylor’s debut album, and worked on 2008’s Fearless, co-writing the song “White Horse” that won the Grammy for Best Country Song of the Year in 2010, and “You Belong With Me” which was nominated for the Song of the Year Grammy for all of music. The success of the songwriting duo helped lead to Taylor’s monster wins at the 2009 CMA Awards, where she took home Female Vocalist of the Year, Album of the Year for Fearless, and Entertainer of the Year.
Meanwhile daughter Caitlin Rose is going about songwriting in an old-school fashion, playing songwriter and performer. Blessed with an immaculate voice and songwriting in her genes, she is trying to make her way from the ground up, recently releasing the album Own Side Now in the UK, which will be available in the US in March. I saw her recently opening for Justin Townes Earle, where she gave thanks to people for letting her crash on their floors as she faces the all too common struggles of up and coming artists that do not have the spotlight celebrity franchises like Taylor Swift have.
What percentage of those Swift songs did mama Rose write? The anti-Taylor crowd will tell you she wrote nearly everything, but thanks to an old school tradition of the country music writing establishment called “Third For A Word”, regardless of Liz Rose’s contributions to these songs, Taylor will get equal rights in regards to songwriting credit and revenue.
Music Row’s songwriting machine is a bevy of collaboration, where many songwriters work with each other to get kinks worked out or power through mental blocks. Even if a songwriter or performer only contributes one word, they will still get a third of the songwriting rights if there were two other writers involved. And as music sales plummet and superstars look to cash in on whatever revenue streams they can, lucrative songwriting rights have enticed more big-named performers, many who have never written their own songs, to contribute a “Word for a Third”, leaving some behind-the-scenes songwriters perturbed. Songwriting revenues are one of the few things in the music industry that are actually increasing, rising 7% last year, and as a songwriting article in The Tennessean points out:
Recent albums by Carrie Underwood, Reba McEntire and Kellie Pickler included several co-writing credits by each of those performers, which was a rarity or even nonexistent on the artists’ previous albums. That trend has sparked its share of controversy among nonperforming songwriters who, behind the scenes, are critical of artists who show up at songwriting sessions, contribute little to the process but claim credit and future royalties for the songs created.
Songwriting has become so lucrative because as album and song sales have decreased, cross-marketing opportunities for songs in movies, TV, commercials, video games, and other places have increased. But the amount of professional songwriters in Nashville has decreased 75% in the last five years because the business has become more cutthroat. The always-present struggle of journeyman songwriters in Nashville trying to get the attention of the stars they want to perform their songs has led to some relinquishing rights in the “Third for a Word” rule just to get their song some attention from a big name.
As the music industry’s infrastructure and control continues to crumble, and as the one increasing revenue stream for music continues to be songwriting, how the politics of songwriting unfold might be the key to the industry’s continued declines, its potential stabilization, or its eventual recovery. If songwriting revues are co-opted to keep celebrity-named music franchises like “Carrie Underwood” and “Reba McEntire” in operation, this could be at the expense of some of Nashville’s best wordsmiths. Some career songwriters have now quit the business, or have to moonlight as waiters or work at Home Depot to keep the lights on, taking time and energy from their passion. It is not hard to surmise that in this environment, creativity and diversity amongst Music Row’s songwriting pool will continue to dry up as celebrities use the good intentions of “Third For A Word” to help keep their infrastructure and top-shelf wealth afloat.
February 1, 2011 @ 1:29 pm
The Industry is failing from within. Hehehe. Die corporate music die! Maybe the rest of the songwriters will grow some brains and do something that will benefit to themselves instead.
February 1, 2011 @ 2:10 pm
Amen.
February 1, 2011 @ 1:41 pm
I think the Third For A Word thing is pretty annoying. It gives the pop fanbase what they think is ammo, as if their favorite cookie cutter so-called artist actually wrote their songs. It’s a pathetic facade of authenticity that they’re going to cling to when they come around to piss and moan at you when one of the “This pop country guy is a fucking moron” articles gets posted.
February 1, 2011 @ 3:34 pm
In that respect it is like auto-tune. It creates an inauthentic picture of what is actually going on.
February 1, 2011 @ 1:54 pm
and the old do-gooder in me dies just a little bit more…
February 1, 2011 @ 2:14 pm
LOVE this Trig. Great article. And the industrial food thing wasn’t lost on me…way to pull me into being even more disgusted by this than I could have imagined.
Fight the power!
…only, what is the answer to this, eh?
February 1, 2011 @ 2:38 pm
Given the quality of many of the artist cowrites, I believe the artists, particularly the ladies mentioned in The Tennessean article, are contributing quite a bit more than a word. Probably whole verses at a minimum. I would say that the correct criticism in the case of the Carrie Underwood/Martina McBride/Reba McEntire/et al. situations is not that they’re not doing the work. The criticism ought to be leveled at the creatively stifling nature of the “by committee” approach and at labels for not having a higher standard for what ends up on their albums. Unless you believe the conspiracy theorists, Taylor Swift solo wrote all of her current album and I think the lack of Liz Rose shows through the incoherence and awkward scanning of many of the songs.
February 1, 2011 @ 3:43 pm
I think I had a piece to say about the stifling nature of “by committee” as well, thought that wasn’t my focus. I don’t know if the quality of the co-writes necessarily point to more involvement from the artists, or the ever-present effect of Nashville to makes a great song good or fair so that it appeals to more people.
I am keeping a close eye on how these new Taylor Swift songs are being received. They are long, much longer than what is normally accepted by radio, and involved. One of the reasons they might have run away from the Liz Sloan relationship is because they wanted to prove that Taylor could be “more mature.” But you’re right, many of the lyrics in the songs are incongruent. But the production might be so good that nobody will notice. And guess who gets to keep all of the songwriting revenue?
February 1, 2011 @ 2:48 pm
ol’ waylons song nashville bum explains this pretty damn good…
February 1, 2011 @ 3:32 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cd9OB7DFP2s
“You can change a word or two, and I’ll give half of it to you.
I’ll be a star tomorrow, but today I’m a Nashville bum.”
February 1, 2011 @ 4:24 pm
Don Henley and Glenn Frey used to pull this trick whenever Randy Meisner or Benrie Leadon and later on Don Felder would write a song and think it was done only to have Frey or Henley change one word and claim songwriting credit..Tom parker even had a policy for some songwriters that if they wanted Elvis to record a song they had to give him co-writing credit.. alot of them like Dolly Parton said no
February 1, 2011 @ 4:45 pm
All I’m gonna say is that Caitlin Rose can write, and sing, circles around Taylor Swift. With one had tied behind her back no less.
February 1, 2011 @ 6:40 pm
I don’t know if the Colonel pioneered this system, but I do know that Elvis was always co-credited for songwriting, even though (I believe) he only ever penned one song. Wish I could remember the damned name of it …..
February 4, 2011 @ 6:02 am
Carla, he actually penned two songs: “You’ll Be Gone” and “That’s Someone You Never Forget.” But, no, the Colonel didn’t start the practice. It was very common in that era. When Elvis found out about it, he had this stopped abruptly around 1957.
February 4, 2011 @ 5:26 pm
Thanks so much for that info Adam. What a treat: I am listening to ‘That’s Someone You Never Forget’ as I’m typing this. As a huge Elvis fan it’s such a rare occurrence to not only hear a song of his I’d not heard before but one he wrote himself. ‘You’ll be Gone’ is the one I’d read about and had heard. I love it and it it saddens me he didn’t write more. I can’t remember where I read about it (possibly the Guralnick bio’s) but I seem to recollect he was discouraged from writing songs. Is this correct? According to Scotty Moore he was a phenomenal guitarist as well but his playing went by the wayside when he gained popularity. Appreciate the heads up Adam. Do you have any articles you’ve written about Elvis you can link me to? PS Sorry for hijacking your comments section about something totally unrelated Triggerman!
October 31, 2015 @ 10:27 pm
Say what you will about her. but we know Taylor Swift can write songs. Her early work showed that. Of course, on her recent album, 1989 most of the music seems to be by her cadre of Swedish song doctors.
February 1, 2011 @ 8:53 pm
I’ve been reading a book lately that so far has a few chapters that really look at the recording process in Nashville in the mid-to-late 90’s. I think Nashville, from all that I’ve read about it so far in this book and others, has been fucked for quite some time now. Even before country became pop.
And sadly I still have yet to finish up Robert Altmans film. One of these days…
February 2, 2011 @ 10:09 am
Isn’t that what Tin Pan Alley was? Changing a word on a published and copyrighted work is prohibited, but if the “songwriter” wants to bring someone in and give that much credit that shows you are the “songwriter” is what they are establishing, a business transaction that gives copyright equally. I write songs, poetry and whatknot Triggerman, and sometimes it is tear stained paper underneath.
I finally took off the plastic on my Rachel Brooke Demo CD. Nothing like a blizzard to get you the time to listen to some new stuff.
February 2, 2011 @ 10:54 am
As much as you would like to think/hope, Liz Rose is very marginal character in Taylor Swifts success. She has admitted many times that she has NOT written ONE song in Taylors albums. She served there as an editor.
That is why it was so easy for her (Taylor) to ditch her. Her part in Taylors songs is extremely marginal.
Man who really is a big part of her songs (musical part) is Nathan Chapman. That dude really is her goldmine.
February 3, 2011 @ 9:38 pm
This has been going on forever here in nashville. the nickname of this town shouldnt be music city usa, rather call it music factory usa.
today i changed the radio station in a co-workers office from 103.3 (country) to 107.5 (pop). the music at the low level he keeps it in, took him a half hour to realize that it wasnt country station anymore. only realized when a rap song came on.
This city produces pop. Thats it folks. If you want country here you gotta look for it online.
Just my two cents worth.
August 13, 2022 @ 9:17 am
This wouldn’t have become a trend if so many music fans didn’t act like a singer has to write their own material to be considered legitimate.