Cumulus Media’s VP Admits Country Can’t Be Delineated from Pop — Wants to Bring Taylor Swift Back to Country
Last month a couple of Cumulus Media-owned country radio stations raised eyebrows when they mixed pop songs into their otherwise country rotations. The NASH-branded Cumulus flagship in New York WNSH, and KSCS 96.3 in Dallas both experimented to see what would happen if they added a few out-of-format spins, with WNSH 94.7 in New York City since moving on from the test, but KSCS in Dallas doubling down and now consistently playing one Taylor Swift song per hour on average, as well as songs from Ed Sheeran and other pop artists.
The next question from radio observers and KSCS listeners was “Why?” KSCS addressed the decision to listeners publicly, saying in part, “If the audience that loves Taylor is forced to go to pop exclusively to find her, we’re hurting our chance of growing our radio station. So the real question is, ‘Why can’t it happen in reverse?’”
But now Executive Vice President of Programming and Content for Cumulus John Dickey has come out to explain the KSCS move, and not only does it sound permanent, it sounds like it’s just the preemptive beginning to what we may see from more Cumulus-owned country stations in the future. And along with addressing the KSCS issue, John Dickey also dropped a few pretty succulent observations about country’s pop-leaning trajectory that offer some insight into how radio is looking to handle the issues of Taylor Swift’s departure in the long-term, and the big question of another country music quandary: Sam Hunt.
“We are defining what country is in those markets,” John Dickey said in this week’s Country Aircheck.“We own the only Country station in New York and at this point we own the only two Country stations in Dallas. And if there were to ever be a third, we would own it as well. So we’re in good stead and therefore have the opportunity to try a few things.”
Basically John Dickey said that since Cumulus has a monopoly on the mainstream country stations in these major media markets, they could do as they please without fear of competition usurping their standing with listeners, highlighting one of the issues with radio consolidation and deregulation. Also, by saying the company is “defining what country is,” in markets, it shows the arrogance of Cumulus and the type of influence they peddle over the listening population. Cumulus also owns KPLX in Dallas—a station that for the moment is sticking to a more country format. But KSCS is featuring Taylor Swift in fairly heavy rotation.
“The key for us is what we’re doing with Taylor Swift there and in Dallas by playing her every hour,” John Dickey says. “We’re going to see how it works, and maybe eventually roll it out more … The real story is not so much that we occasionally play an Echosmith or Ed Sheeran song; it’s why have we been sending people to Top 40 for Taylor Swift for the last 15 months? … Why let the Top 40 stations have a monopoly on the biggest artist on the planet because she wanted to creatively expand her horizons? It’s crazy … We are back in the Taylor business and this is why. That’s the story.”
Yes ladies and gentlemen, that means despite leaving the country format, Taylor Swift, including some of her new singles, could be coming to a country station near you through Cumulus’ massive country radio network. The question when Taylor Swift left country music was would country music let her? The answer for the most part has been “yes” except for a few stragglers and outlier stations. But now that country radio is struggling with the key 18 to 34-year-old demographic, it looks like they’re being tempted to add Taylor Swift back to rotations.
But that’s just where the bad news for country from John Dickey begins. The sum of all country music fears is realized in another statement Dickey made about how the country format is basically lying to itself at the moment about its genre autonomy.
“You don’t know these artists. You’re just listening to just a few hooks of their songs,” John Dickey says. “You tell me what they are. Florida Georgia Line country, rock or pop? We can do Brantley Gilbert, Eric Church or Sam Hunt. You’re telling me Sam Hunt’s song is country? Today Country is successful because it’s co-oping other audiences into the format. The problem that our business will always have and that will keep it from realizing its full potential is the narrow-mindedness of the industry; the inability of people inside our business to look at what we’re trying to do and not be so formatically rigid about what defines Country.”
In other words, John Dickey, the EVP of the second-largest radio station owner of the country is admitting that if you turn on one of his country radio stations, you can’t tell the difference between country artists, and the artists of pop and rock. This might be the biggest executive admission that country radio has lost control of its autonomy. Yet John Dickey still goes on to call the industry narrow minded for not opening the doors even wider in country to attract even more listeners.
But what may be good for country radio might be bad for country music. Facing competition from new consumer technologies that give listeners more choice, radio has to resort to attempting to appeal to everyone to keep enough listeners tuned in. But at the same time, by alienating country radio’s core listenership, especially older listeners who are more likely to tune into country radio as opposed to new technologies, Cumulus Media’s solution is also continuously exacerbating the problem. Meanwhile if the country format cannot delineate itself from everything else in the music world, then how can it define a future for itself? Basically John Dickey is admitting the mono-genre is here, and not only should we embrace it, we should solidify it by bringing more non-country music into the format.
And what might even be worse is what John Dickey didn’t talk about in the Country Aircheck interview—specifically that not a peep was uttered about NASH Icon: The Cumulus Media solution to the dilemma of older country artists getting shuffled aside in the rush to youth, many while their still economically viable on a macro scale with loyal fan bases. The hope was the country format would eventually split into two separate formats, with Top 40 country on one side, and more older country on the other. Now this idea appears to be off the table.
With the rise of Sam Hunt, with so many male country artist chasing the new EDM/R&B trend with recent singles in an attempt to keep up, and the re-integration of Taylor Swift back into a format she formally and consciously left, country music could be looking at losing its connection with anything and everything that traditionally defines the genre and separates it from other music by as soon as the 3rd quarter of this year. Meanwhile Music Row’s major labels are fueling the trend, Billboard appears complicit to include songs and artists that sonically would be more appropriate for other genres on country music charts, and the CMA is asleep at the wheel.
Beyond the tired discussions of what is country music and what isn’t, time appears to be running out to save the last vestiges of what country music once was before it is completely incorporated as just a separate but equivalent version of American pop.
Jay
April 29, 2015 @ 8:30 am
Trig you should start your own awards show, and give awards to all the music industry idiots killing us with their ignorance. Call it the CDA’s, the country darwin awards.
Jared
April 29, 2015 @ 8:37 am
Wait…there’s only two country stations in Dallas??
Trigger
April 29, 2015 @ 8:40 am
Once again it shows the arrogance and power of a company like Cumulus that can basically control the airwaves in the 5th largest media market in the country. For all intents and purposes though, he’s right. That’s not an insult to 95.9 The Ranch and others, but the share of the market they have is so low, basically a company like Cumulus can just laugh them off.
Clovis
April 29, 2015 @ 8:56 am
I’m in Plano, and I’d love to listen to The Ranch but can’t pick it up 🙁
MH
April 29, 2015 @ 9:14 am
I listen to it on the interwebs. In Nashville.
Clovis
April 29, 2015 @ 10:50 am
Sure. I do check in on the internet, too. It’s just frustrating to be that close to the station, and not even be able to pick it up while in my car. I end up having to listen to The Wolf because it’s the lesser of the two Cumulus evils.
Trigger
April 29, 2015 @ 9:45 am
That’s part of the problem. When one major company owns all the stations with the biggest signal strength in one market, it doesn’t even matter if they have competition. It’s using the FCC’s regulations to stifle competition as opposed to encouraging it.
Bobby
April 29, 2015 @ 7:45 pm
KHYI 95.3 The Range is also good.
JC Eldredge
April 29, 2015 @ 8:38 am
If they want to play Pop then they should change the format of their station, period. If I want to listen to country, I don’t want to turn on a country station and hear Ariana Grande. There is room for all different types of stations, they don’t need to alienate most country fans to appease a few. We have a new station here called Tailgate, it plays top 40 songs from all genres, from the 80’s to today. I’ve listened to it some and its actually not too bad. One day it went from Elton John to Guns and Roses to Luke Bryan to John Mellancamp to Alan Jackson. The biggest thing I like about it is, with all the material to choose from, they don’t play the same thing over and over. However when I turn it on, I know I’m not going to hear just country, because they are clear about their format. A company that wants to please everyone on one station should add something like that.
Fuzzy TwoShirts
April 29, 2015 @ 8:43 am
I just bring a tub of cds along when I go for a trip now. (Cassettes if I take my 94 GMC.) This way when I want to hear Stringbean I get Stringbean and when I want Van Halen I get Van Halen. I suppose it’s people like me to blame for the state of radio because they’re trying so hard to get us back. Oh wait, they drove us away by being terrible, so it’s their fault.
Scotty J
April 29, 2015 @ 8:55 am
Sadly I’m afraid that traditional country music is dead as a force in mainstream radio and maybe even the wider culture.
Great country music will still be made but I just don’t think that anyone making that kind of music will ever reach the success levels of a George Strait or Alan Jackson ever again.
I really hope I’m wrong but I just think a confluence of events have moved the culture at large away from what we have all loved.
sbach66
April 29, 2015 @ 9:02 am
Yet one more reason why I don’t listen to country radio any more.
Jared
April 29, 2015 @ 9:03 am
I advocate that we stop using the term “traditional country” in favor of “authentic country.”
Hawkeye
April 30, 2015 @ 6:23 pm
Also we should stop using the terms “Bro-country” and “Metro-politan” for a term that will describe ALL the CRAP on country radio these days.
Anyone esle up for the term Nu-Country?
Also anything played on country radio that’s actually worth listening to should be called Anomaly-Country.
the pistolero
April 29, 2015 @ 9:04 am
country music could be looking at losing its connection with anything and everything that traditionally defines the genre and separates it from other music by as soon as the 3rd quarter of this year.
I’m not sure about that. There are still the Texas and Americana and red dirt scenes, and the stations that play that music. I do understand that all that is a pretty small segment of the overall country music picture, and I do understand the trepidation here. But if Gary Overton was wrong ”” and he obviously was ”” might this be overblown a bit?
Trigger
April 29, 2015 @ 10:08 am
I am speaking about mainstream country radio symbolized by companies like Cumulus and iHeartMedia. Obviously there is still plenty of love for country in small, outlier stations and communities, but as symbolized by the words of Gary Overton, and now John Dickey, they basically don’t matter in the grand scheme of things when it comes to the mainstream mindset.
the pistolero
April 29, 2015 @ 5:28 pm
Ah, gotcha. But I still don’t know. I mean, I know what you’ve said in the past about the dangers of the “I got mine, everybody else can go screw” school of thought,” but there’s still a thriving market for music that isn’t played on the radio as evidenced by the success of Sturgill Simpson and Aaron Watson. And I think that what’s gotten them to where they are is going to do a lot to carry the genre itself on, even if it isn’t as culturally prominent as it once was.
MH
April 29, 2015 @ 9:14 am
Taylor Swift is played once an hour? They’re definitely trying to run off the last of the 35-and-up listeners.
Can’t wait to see Ed Sheeran and Ariana Grande up for CMA Entertainer of the Year!
MC
April 29, 2015 @ 9:32 am
The problem that our business will always have and that will keep it from realizing its full potential is the narrow-mindedness of the industry; the inability of people inside our business to look at what we”™re trying to do and not be so formatically rigid about what defines Country.” (quote from above article)
Wait! Isn’t that the point? That a Country radio station plays music that Pop stations do not and is thus defined as a “Country Station?” These Bozos are drivin’ me crazy!
Albert
April 29, 2015 @ 10:06 am
Imagine turning on your local TV station to watch the ball game and finding they’ve decided to air a chess tournament instead . Imagine going to a movie expecting The Avengers and they change up the schedule and play Paul Blart , Mall Cop without telling you . Imagine buying a BMW , getting it home and finding it’s a Mazda engine in there . WTF …..how do these radio stations reflect any integrity or respect when they pull this shit on long time listeners who’ve kept them in business ?
Silver24ado
May 4, 2015 @ 11:10 am
I like your analogies, you hit the nail on the head. It is how I feel, like I’m being ripped off. There’s a reason I “went country” in the 90’s and discovered many artists and songs (old and new then) that I was missing in the Pop/Rock/Rap…world. I was yerning for some substance and musicality that spoke to me. I found it in country music.
I’m tired of trying to explain to people how bad mainstream “country” sucks and their retort is, “It’s good to me and they win awards and put on excellent shows and sell millions of albums and it’s evolving and 10, 000 people were at the show so it must be good and they rock and it makes me wanna dance and you’re just a hater…..” Fine. It still doesn’t mean it’s country music, or even “good” for that matter.
I’m gonna use this analogy in the future: It’s like tuning into MTV and realizing it’s all (bad) “reality” shows. Where’d the music go?
Albert
April 29, 2015 @ 9:35 am
” Mama let the wolf in ” – Alison Moorer
You don’t have to be a genius to trace the roots of this catastrophic scenario to Taylor Swift . In fact , this interview says as much . As soon as she was forced upon ” country ” music and garnered a teeny-bopper audience , the writing was on the wall . It was the demise of a mature and much loved genre. In fact , it could have been Bieber or Jessica Simpson a few years earlier had they had access to the deep pockets and business expereince T.S. did through her family . It sickens me to think that a 16 year old with NO musical experience , no life experience , little to no talent and nothing to say lyrically to anyone over 14 was allowed to single-handedly destroy the integrity and the careers of so many worthy and much-needed artists , musicians and songwriters because the ‘industry’ couldn’t see past the dollar signs of her financial success. Even more disturbing and frustrating was watching the very artists whose amazing careers were being destroyed embrace her as a ‘ guest ‘ artist , having her open tours for them , joining her on award shows and album cuts , cutting duets with her , hitching theri wagons to her in whatever way they could ,applauding everything she touched and said and recorded like she was the second coming of the Lord. And yet as tragic as I feel all of this is , I can’t help feeling that the industry got what they deserved when they let the wolf in hoping to make money off her . The Empress had no clothes …..but they didn’t care . They were seduced so completely they’ve helped her earn enough to buy the whole store and put themselves out of business .
Albert
April 29, 2015 @ 3:52 pm
Just in case you still think Ms Taylor is a good ( country, pop ..whatever ) singer, have a listen to this disastrously pitchy performance at the Opry to remind you of where it all went off the rails . She wouldn’t have made it past the first 10 thousand applications as a contestant for Idol , the Voice ,or our local grocery store singing competition .
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-cFIJKat0Z0
Eric
April 29, 2015 @ 9:51 pm
Absolutely ridiculous.
Just listen to Taylor’s first 3 albums (the ones that actually got significant country radio play) and compare the songs to bro-country or metro-country. There is no contest: country Taylor was far more country. As for Jessica Simpson: by the time Taylor gained prominence in country music, Jessica Simpson had already amassed magnitudes greater wealth and income than Taylor’s family. Also, keep in mind that Taylor started out on a small label with very little capital; the reason why Big Machine and Borchetta are so powerful today is because of Taylor’s hard work and ability to connect with the audience.
Now, I will grant that Taylor may have indirectly contributed to the current woes of country music by introducing a large pop-loving young audience to the genre. I remember reading an article from around 2010 or 2011 discussing how Music Row’s marketing research was showing that the country music fan demographic had changed significantly and that the labels were planning to retool to cater to the new young fans.
Liza
April 30, 2015 @ 9:33 pm
I always thought the demise started with Big and Rich.
BanditDarville
May 4, 2015 @ 6:26 pm
Shania Twain.
CountryKnight
May 5, 2015 @ 11:27 pm
I remember debating about Taylor Swift in high school a couple of years ago. None of my opponents could understand that I didn’t necessary dislike Taylor Swift’s music, I disliked her existence on the country radio. They were too big of fans of her to listen to any reason. One girl asked me if I would marry her and I replied: “Of course, she makes millions!” 🙂
My fraternity Big grew up in a town near her and she told me that Taylor Swift was not the nice, sweet angel that the PR sells. That statement started off a big argument in our coed service fraternity.
Fuzzmeister TwoShirts
April 29, 2015 @ 9:45 am
I’ve said the same thing about Taylor, Albert. Give it about an hour and Eric will tell us once again why she isn’t to blame for the fate of country radio, so have your arguments ready.
CountryKnight
May 5, 2015 @ 11:20 pm
I was really looking forward to the debate. 🙁
Kale
April 29, 2015 @ 9:56 am
Isn’t this one of the signs of the end of days?
Hawkeye
April 30, 2015 @ 6:27 pm
Checked Revelation
Nothing about bad music but if “country” musians start urging everyone to get a chip or something in their hand then one of them is the antichrist.
Screw Marylin Manson, pop and country is where the true satanist are. Only the devil can make something that horrible!
Bear
April 29, 2015 @ 10:29 am
This makes me think of vanity sizing in clothing stores where the mislabel pants as 32 when they are actually 38. And it is suggested you buy what looks good on you and cut out the number.
So if they want to play pop music because that has a larger audience, fine. Just cut out the damn genre label and stop claiming to play country.
lisa
April 29, 2015 @ 10:34 am
This makes me so glad for Pandora, Spotify, and any other music-streaming service. Within the last year I’ve stopped listening to my local country stations-I’ve actually found that I would rather drive in silence, or just listen to a straight-up pop station-if I’m going to listen to pop, at least I’m not listening to a station thats lying about what it is. There were two up until last year, and they played a good mix of older and newer mainstream country, up until last year, when “The Bull” came into Boston. Its a Clear Channel station, featuring Bobby Bones morning show, playing only “new country.” Once they started, gone was any variety from the older two stations. One station used to have “Sunday Morning Country Oldies” which disappeared the same week “The Bull 101.7” went live-could they have been more obvious that they now just wanted to keep up with the “new hot” station?
Six String Richie
April 29, 2015 @ 11:00 am
Isn’t this gonna drive a lot of baby boomers out of the format? Baby boomers have the most buying power of any age group. They’re the reason why Bruce Springstein, Elton John, Billy Joel, The Rolling Stones and countless other aging acts still draw the biggest crowds. If country loses the baby boomers, they will loose a lot of fans with a lot of disposable income. Including fans that buy physical albums and concert tickets.
Trigger
April 29, 2015 @ 11:07 am
That’s exactly what is happening according to research. By trying to court young listeners, radio is cutting its own legs off and betting their future on consumers more apt to use other technologies to listen to music. All the research supports this, but they seem to be unable to wrestle themselves away from the idea that 18-year-olds drive the market.
Enjoy Every Sandwich
April 29, 2015 @ 12:45 pm
Just being cranky I guess, but I sometimes wonder if they just hold us older folk in such contempt that they think we are unable to comprehend new-fangled technology and will thus have no choice but to listen to their radio stations regardless of what they play. If so they’re in for a big shock; the young ‘uns may use the new tech, but who do they think created it? I can get by fine without radio; the only reason I still even have one in my vehicle is for traffic reports, weather, etc. And it’s really obsolescent for even those purposes.
Eric
April 29, 2015 @ 9:58 pm
Older people are still far less likely to listen to online radio than younger people.
Habits die hard.
Enjoy Every Sandwich
April 30, 2015 @ 5:23 am
I hear what you’re saying, but I’ll tell you: habits do die hard, but they can die if they’re beaten badly enough. The habit certainly died with me. And if country radio continues down this path it’ll die with more folks. And online radio is not the only alternative path.
Scotty J
April 29, 2015 @ 12:57 pm
It is the surest sign that the people running country music have not come from the country music industry. One of the main things that has stood out about country music is the longevity of careers and the loyalty of performers to their fans and vice versa. This kind of loyalty should be gold to any business but the people in charge come from other genres where the churn is so fast that it’s onto the next thing and then the next and the next.
It really can’t be pointed out enough how the people in charge actually HATE the genre of music that they are working in. So they change it.
Albert
April 29, 2015 @ 1:11 pm
” One of the main things that has stood out about country music is the longevity of careers and the loyalty of performers to their fans and vice versa. This kind of loyalty should be gold to any business but the people in charge come from other genres ……”
SOOO important . Loyalty , trust and respect is the foundation of ANY relationship …a couple , an artist and his fans , a radio station and the listeners that got them where they are . NONE of this seems to hold significant importance to the ‘ industry’ any more .
Eric
April 29, 2015 @ 9:55 pm
Baby Boomers also constituted the heart of the neotraditional country movement of the late 80s and early 90s. Maybe Cumulus realizes this too, which is why Nash Icon will focus on that period.
Charlie
April 29, 2015 @ 11:00 am
Well, fuck. The pickin’s on radio were already getting slimmer and slimmer–looks the downward trend will continue. If so, I would say it will be effectively un-listenable, even for someone with my wide strike zone!
I hate to have to pay for 100% of the music I listen to. But that’s where I’m at, since there is not a streaming service that ‘has it all’.
Kale
April 29, 2015 @ 11:10 am
In their quest to dominate all music, they aren’t thinking logically. Why compete with pop for the 16-34 or whatever demographic and ultimately fail, when they can aim for the audience that actually listens to more radio? It would be much more lucrative than alienating the true fans and catering to trend chasers.
Dr. Doom
April 29, 2015 @ 11:44 am
Loki, Ultron, and I are making a country album. It’s called “Country Music is Doomed.” Ironic that Tom Hiddleston plays Loki on movies and will also play Hank Williams. He does an excellent Tyler Hubbard impression. And kids like rapping robot voices, that’s why Ultron is on there. I’ll also be hosting an awards show with Hank… no Tom… no LOKI which will be called SCM, which stands for “Screw Country Music.”
Jason
April 29, 2015 @ 11:58 am
God, was April a horrible month for country music. Heck, even just this week seemed to have bad news every day.
Zac Brown Band released a decent album, but even they fell to the levels of Sam Hunt with “Beautiful Drug”. Tyler Farr released a new album that was average at best, to nobody’s surprise. Nelly has a “country” album announced. Now, we see that country and pop are pretty much the same, even in the eyes of radio stations.
Here’s to hoping May is better.
Mike W.
April 29, 2015 @ 1:51 pm
The flipside to the mainstream Country world continuing to be pretty terrible, is that April saw the release of great albums from Dwight Yoakam, Randy Rogers/Wade Bowen, John Moreland, etc.
Mainstream Country music sucks and looks like it will continue to suck for the foreseeable future, but the independent scene is getting stronger and stronger.
Albert
April 29, 2015 @ 3:45 pm
Yes …great point , Mike . There ARE so many great artists out there writing and performing honest country music . Hopefully the mainstream demographic gets bored with the same ol same ol and looks elsewhere for the good stuff .
Clint
April 29, 2015 @ 11:59 am
I hope, that when John Dickey gets to Hell, Satan runs his buns, day and night, with a flaming pineapple.
86TELE
April 29, 2015 @ 12:04 pm
Mr. Dickey, may the bird of paradise fly up your nose!
Kuzco
April 29, 2015 @ 12:15 pm
This is one of the most shortsighted business strategies I’ve ever heard of. Let me get this straight, John Dickey thinks that the way to save country radio is to play pop music on it? Sure, they’ll draw more listeners in the short term because that’s what’s popular, but this will have two effects: 1)if they keep going down this road, they will put themselves in direct competition with top 40 stations, which are by definition the most popular 2)it will drive away the older demographic who is more likely to stick with radio over the long term. The young so-called “key” demographic is leaving radio behind, and radio stations need to accept that as the new reality if they want to survive. So basically they’re screwing country music just so they can shoot themselves in the foot.
Scotty J
April 29, 2015 @ 12:48 pm
We have to kill the patient to save the patient!
CountryKnight
April 29, 2015 @ 5:53 pm
If even Kuzco gets it, then the concept cannot be that tough! 😉
(Love the Emperor’s New Groove!) Great handle
Eric
April 29, 2015 @ 10:00 pm
The main issue here is less about age than about authentic country vs pop fans. There are far more pop fans than authentic country fans. As a result, the country radio industry thinks that they can maximize their profits by going pop.
Kuzco
April 30, 2015 @ 4:35 am
Good point, Eric. I think it’s important to note that unlike pop fans who tend to just listen to whatever ear candy they happen across, authentic country fans tend to demonstrate a strong loyalty to their genre (if you want evidence, just look to how much everyone at this site cares about what’s happening at country radio, even though we barely like any of the songs!). I’m sure the industry will profit in the short term by the move to pop, but they continue to chase away their loyal customer base at every turn. One day, when the “key demographic” has moved on to more mature music, the industry will look up and realize that no one wants what they’re trying to sell.
David
April 29, 2015 @ 1:02 pm
I’m in the Detroit area, and our biggest local country station has been playing Taylor Swift’s “Wildest Dreams” a couple times a day. The station is a Cumulus station I believe, but I could be wrong about that.
Mike
April 29, 2015 @ 2:24 pm
They are never going to stop, are they? Corporate radio and media will not stop until country music is truly dead.
Chris
April 29, 2015 @ 4:13 pm
In other words they want to sell country radio out to pop as much as possible to keep me and millions of country music fans from listening to country radio. And they wonder why they are losing listeners.
Bob Papanos
April 29, 2015 @ 7:48 pm
It’s fun to blame it all on Swift, but the arguments get pretty silly/stupid when on the one hand she has no talent, nothing to say, and her Daddy bought it for her, while on the other hand she held a gun to head of established artists like George and Kenny and Brad and forced them to follow her lead into Bubblegum Land. Can’t have it both ways, and the argument gets confused by a seemingly total failure to understand what a radio station does. A radio station does not champion a genre or a tradition, a radio station sells advertising. Those who own stations seeks to maximize advertising revenue by broadcasting programming that will attract the demographic that advertisers will pay to reach. We all say, of course we understand this, but in fact we treat our local station as a public utility which ought to broadcast what we want to listen to, regardless of how valuable our ears are. I recently read an article ranking the stations in the U.S. by ad revenue [http://www.statista.com/statistics/305902/highest-revenue-radio-stations-usa/], and the #1 was Ryan Seacrest’s KISS in Los Angeles, the world temple of teeny-bop. But five of the top 10 were news-talk-sports stations. A country station did not make the list. None of us likes to admit that we are too old (and/or too poor) to attract advertising, but that’s the base of the problem, not one artist. One has to agree with Trigger that Cumulus is probably making a mistake, but that’s capitalism. When I drive, I listen to my iPod full of 2 days worth of music I selected. If I drove a lot, I would have satellite radio installed. I personally have no use for radio stations, as I am over 70 and the last DooWop station recently changed formats. We all like to listen to the music that was burned into our adolescent brains between about 14 and 19. The key question is how we separate the argument over what radio stations play from the discussion of how to save the music we like and the artists who produce it. Increasingly, radio stations will disappear, and can not be relied on to save anything. The consolidation of the past decade is a sign of weakness, not strength. Overall the business is highly leveraged and not very profitable. The music we like can only be supported by buying concert tickets and downloading/purchasing the songs we want to hear, either new or old. Come on — we figured out car radios, then FM. We could play 45’s and 33’s on our record players, then 8-tracks, and cassettes, then CD’s, and now streaming. It’s not that difficult to keep up, nor very expensive when Spotify lets you do it all for free.
Kuzco
April 30, 2015 @ 4:42 am
You’re absolutely right that it’s all about advertising, which is why they’re trying to chase young people. I just wonder whether they would be better off by cultivating loyal listeners. It may not pay as much now, but it’s sustainable in the long run.
You’re also right about the Taylor Swift arguments. She’s never been the ultimate problem with country music.
And thank God for the internet.
Chris
April 30, 2015 @ 7:31 pm
They are trying to save a sinking ship by doing more of what is causing it to sink. Keeping loyal country fan listeners is worth more than temporary pop and rock fan listeners. Maybe one loyal country fan listener is worth more than five bandwagon pop fans or something like that.
Alex
April 30, 2015 @ 3:30 pm
I’m with you for the most part, I just think Taylor does have something to say (albeit, not to the 35-year-old-once-majority-of-country-music-listeners). She has some better lyrics than anything that has come from Brad/Kenny/George in the past 5 years. And, as much as her dad bought her all the tools/connections she needed, she was the one promoting her stuff non-stop from the time she was fifteen (and she’s arguably written more songs than any other successful musician her age).
Regardless of where you stand on her talent, it doesn’t make sense to blame a sixteen-year-old who wants to be a famous musician for where country music has gone, as you said. Blame the radio stations, blame Borchetta, blame Cumulus. This shouldn’t be about condemning a young woman (who has said numerous times that her current album is /not/ country and she doesn’t want it to count as such, but that one day she may go back to the genre), but condemning people who want money over good music.
Eric
April 29, 2015 @ 10:29 pm
“Today Country is successful because it”™s co-oping other audiences into the format. The problem that our business will always have and that will keep it from realizing its full potential is the narrow-mindedness of the industry; the inability of people inside our business to look at what we”™re trying to do and not be so formatically rigid about what defines Country.””
This has got to be one of the most idiotic statements I have ever heard about music. Putting aside Dickey’s utter lack of understanding of the definition of a genre and discussing his strategy in purely economic terms, the whole point of running a genre-specific radio station is to sacrifice some potential fans and short-term profit in exchange for a long-term loyal fan base. If the sole purpose of every radio station is to maximize immediate profit, then there is absolutely no point to country radio and every station should switch to a modern pop format.
Eduardo Vargas
April 30, 2015 @ 6:33 am
Oh dear. To be honest I can’t see Nellys album being a success and I don’t think that all of those R&B/EDM songs will be hits, but if THIS happens, then it could be the straw that breaks the camels back
jimmy row
May 1, 2015 @ 10:13 am
Maybe if they didnt buy up every goddamn radio station in the country it wouldnt be such a problem trying to please everybody all the time including the goddamn stockholders! Fuck them and their fucking pompous attitudes. It is infuriating that they snatch up most of the “public” airwaves and fucking destroy every redeeming quality the stations had to offer. Then have the audacity to complain about waining profits especially in the coveted 18-34 market. Streaming is nice, but there is a level of disconnect that exists and people tend to isolate themselves. Remember when people would talk about the good shows they heard on radio?
sweet on stuart
May 1, 2015 @ 4:53 pm
Is it possible that this could be a radio revolution in general? Radio stations have always been segregated in terms of genre ie Rock, R & B, country, jazz. Growing up on Long Island in the mid-late 60’s /70’s I mostly heard WABC which was the big Top 40 station. I remember hearing different genres being played in succession. Everything that crossed over was played, Stones, Aretha, Roberta Flack,Elton John, Carly Simon, Stevie Wonder, Croce, Charlie Rich , Steely Dan,,,well you get the picture.
Is it possible that music “appreciation” is getting so broad that stations just have to become more eclectic just to get more ears listening? Just a thought. Does America still want their music to be categorized?
I know you can’t please everyone but my ideal format would be everything but the kitchen sink. I’d love to hear CSNY and Roxy Music followed by Marvin, Cash and even some Taylor Swift. And a few NPR-ish acts. Just mix it up. It’s probably a pipe dream. It would take a genius programmer to carry that out and please the masses and Madison Ave.
Country Blog Jim
May 2, 2015 @ 7:05 am
I couldn’t agree with you more. Country music is falling apart so quickly that it may be impossible to stop. The problem with these stations playing pop music is that listeners that aren’t fans of Country hear the music and think “Wow, I guess I do like Country music!”, but it ain’t Country, and they don’t even realize it. So now there is an enormous audience out there that thinks they like Country music and they don’t even know what Country really is. And the record labels and artists don’t make it any better because all they care about is making as much money as possible, heck they’d start doing heavy metal if that’s what people wanted to buy. Meanwhile, artists like Kacey Musgraves continue to get looked over because they sing real Country.
pete marshall
May 2, 2015 @ 7:21 pm
I really like Taylor Swift and I would like her move back to country music. If she does country not pop. Trigger than you for helping me understand about country today isn’t really that great: some is good and some are not good.
Pete
May 3, 2015 @ 8:19 am
Hey Trig… I have a thought, a suggestion. You may personally find it controversial, but please hear me out and sleep on it. There’s no doubt your writing and knowledge of the country music genre and its artists is amazing, probably the best there is. You have tons of fans for it, including myself. I think the blog had / has a noble cause, in trying to change the tide of what I’ll call “country music broadcasts”, e.g. the radio format, award ceremonies, “country music specials”, etc., in favor of keeping alive a more traditional sense of country music. Here’s the thing… I think many of us can agree the cause is dead. I don’t think there is any reversing the tide at this point. An analogy, let’s say a famous actor had some sort of health issue, and the news outlets were covering the potential recovery. And everyone was rooting. But eventually, the unfortunate happened and the actor slipped into a coma. And it became apparent they were never going to wake up. But the news still covered the person, just watching him move further into a vegetative state, covering the slow and painful death. I don’t want your blog to become that news coverage. Because in the next hospital room over, maybe a beautiful baby was born, and we can cover all the awesome things that kid is gonna do over its lifetime. You have single-handedly introduced me to the Sturgill Simpsons, the Eric Strickland and the B Sides’s, re-introduced me to Kelly Picklers of the world who I had previously hadn’t given a second thought after her Idol days. Maybe, just give it a thought, it’s time to refresh the direction of the blog. Maybe shift just a little bit away from covering Nelly and his ridiculous foray into Country, or what Bobby Bones is doing, and focus more on exposing us to the artists who are still creating more traditional country music today. Maybe call the blog “Promoting Authentic Country Music”. Because if instead of reading a signficant part of your blog devoting to letting us all know what we already know to be the case (that the broadcast country music format is pretty much dead), you spent more time shedding light on all the rising “real” country stars, I would get much more excited about visiting your blog, I would (happily) spend a ton more money toward supporting those country artists that you introduced me to, and I would finish reading your writing feeling invigorated and excited about the future of country music, rather than depressed and defeated. You are a master-craftsman when it comes to writing and knowledge. I want to see that gift put to good use. And who knows, if after reading your blog, people go out and support those country artists and they became super-successful, maybe broadcast country radio would actually want to play them again. Wouldn’t that be something great. Just my 2 cents.
Trigger
May 3, 2015 @ 1:13 pm
Hey Pete,
Thanks for your input. I really appreciate it.
A few things here:
First, it is my position to never give up on the cause of country music, however fruitless it might seem. Even if it’s just to to make an archive to let the future know that the core fans of country music were not happy with what was happening and allow our voices to be heard. Even if all of this is raging against the dying of the light, I still see it as as valuable.
Having said that, last year a solution was presented of how more traditional-sounding country music could find its way back to the mainstream through splitting the country music format into two mainstream segments. In my opinion, this was one of the biggest opportunities to help turn the tide possibly ever presented in the genre. It’s in that context that I published this particular article, to attempt to try and restart dialogue and discussion about where the country format is headed. Would the format split be ideal from a traditional country fan’s perspective? Probably not, but it would be a step in the right direction.
To carry out your analogy, sometimes when something has reached it’s lowest point, that’s when the opportunity for a rebound presents itself. Or when something dies, that’s the opportunity for a rebirth. Maybe this is innocent optimism, but I for one will never give up on the cause to save country music.
As for reversing field and never covering these negative articles and only promoting the great traditional artists worth listening to: First off, I already do a tremendous amount of that. Unfortunately, this is the least read, and least shared material this site publishes, while all of the negative coverage is what get most of the attention. And I’m talking 10 to 1. For every person who read my review of Todd Grebe yesterday, 10 people read the story about Nelly making a country record. Now I’m still going to post reviews for Todd Grebe and others because I believe in it. But I never see comments saying, “Hey, stop posting album reviews for cool traditional artists and post more negative stuff.” Why? Because that’s not cool. But the simple fact is it’s a great challenge to get people to engage with that stuff, because in the end most independent and traditional fans are just averted as mainstream fans are to listen to something new. They just want their opinions validated.
Something else everyone should appreciate is just who reads Saving Country Music. It’s not just independent and traditional country music fans. It’s DJ’s, publicists, managers, label heads, other journalists and critics, mainstream fans, and others. You would be blown away by the diversity and exactly who reads this site. And believe it or not, coverage like this article makes a difference, and is changing mindsets. I don’t want to preach to a choir, I want to take the fight to them. I want the money changers on Music Row to feel the heat, and know there’s someone out there watching what they’re doing, and if they do something wrong, they’re going to hear about it, and from a viable outlet that their peers and co-workers are going to read.
Last week was a negative week on SCM, and TRUST ME, there was nobody more aware of that than I. I have a radar in my head, and I don’t need anyone to tell me when they think the site is going in too negative of a direction, or when other trends are developing. There were some things out of my control that were the result of the negativity, principally that a Zac Brown album that a lot of folks were hoping would be a big net positive for country music ended up being a HUGE sum negative. Then a couple of other negative things happened, and all of a sudden everyone thinks SCM has gone off track with its purpose. But you go back to the week before that, and it’s one positive album review after another, stories about Willie & Merle, and other cool stuff. That’s just the way it is. That’s the news cycle, and I do my best to pull things positive when I can. But there has to be positive stories. There has to be that great country record out there for me to talk about. I am consistently listening to music and looking for the next great artist to share with everyone. Nothing motivates me more. But sometimes, they’re just not out there at the moment. Sometimes there’s four excellent albums released on the same day as happened last week.
Finally as for changing the name: This is something that’s been brought up for years. Basically, it will never happen. To change the name of the site, I go back to zero. 2/3’rds to 3/4’s of the traffic that comes to this site comes from Google, and if I changed the name, it would take roughly take 8 years to get back to where I am now, if that was even possible, which it probably wouldn’t be. From a very basic technical standpoint, it is an impossibility and would be suicide for the site.
All that said, I appreciate you and others would like to see more positive coverage for the worthy artists working hard to save country music as opposed to so much negative stuff. I am doing everything I can as a one man operation to help make this happen.
Pete
May 3, 2015 @ 4:40 pm
Thanks for the thoughtful response. All your comments are well taken. Believe me, we both want to see the same thing. (I would also love to have have seen the split format.)
I hope you know I don’t think your blog is all negative. That’s why I mentioned just a few of the great artists you’ve introduced me to, that I’ve read in your positive reviews.
As for the readership and share stats for the various types of articles, yep, I totally get that. I was talking to my other half about this, and that was my assumption. I’ll be totally upfront, whenever I see the word “Rant” next to an article, I get a little excited because I know I’m in for a good laugh, and hearing in your writing what I know everyone is thinking (at least your readers!). I actually found you way back when, when I was googling how awful one of the awards shows was, and you were live-blogging comments. I was hooked.
Regarding the potential futility of it all, I’m glad you’re fighting the good fight. Someone’s gotta do it. I’ve joined many of your other readers who have primarily given up on mainstream country radio, and I listen to the more specialized Sirius/XM stations or my own playlists of whatever country music I like. And that’s where your writing has been so influential and why I look forward to it. While I’ll never get sick of listening to George(s), Hank, or Alan Jackson, it’s been really nice to have some freshness in my playlists with the Sturgills and Erick Stricklands in there.
Lastly, yeah the site name comment was more just a side-comment. I have my own sites and I’m all about SEO, so I hear ya. And hey, it’s still Saving Country Music, one way or another.
Thanks for all you do.
Stephen
May 3, 2015 @ 9:57 am
Why would anyone who loves traditional-sounding country music listen to mainstream, Top 40 country-pop radio stations.
On my phone, I have the KOKE FM app, the WSM app, and the SiriusXM app for Outlaw Country and Willie’s Roadhouse.
Forget so-called mainstream country radio, folks. It’s forever dead and buried.
Albert
May 3, 2015 @ 11:57 pm
Stephen …I’m with you . There are some terrific alternatives to mainstream country radio . But I don’t think that’s the entire solution . Too many younger music fans are coming to country radio thinking that what they’re hearing is country music when its not …..not by a long shot . Everything about the ‘product ‘ from the songwriting to the talent-less ‘singers’ to the anything-but-traditional productions to the rap influences to the absence of female artists to the generic nature of the music to the short shelf life of inferior material is cheating the listener of a much more satisfying musical experience . I think its not only important to the integrity of the genre but to young uninformed listeners to ‘fight the good fight’ in the open to ensure that young listeners are aware of the options and to , hopefully , cultivate a growing fan base of listeners that are not only aware of the options but demand they are played on mainstream radio . I think its borderline criminal the way young listeners are dumbed-down and taken advantage of by meaningless , generic-sounding ‘safe’ playlists on these networks . I know just from my experience as a music teacher , songwriting teacher and demo producer that once these young artists have been introduced to the options ( current and legendary ) they ‘ wake up’ and their own creative output improves immensely . I’m convinced people want something better .
Mike
May 4, 2015 @ 2:48 pm
At this point, I am totally numb to it all. Sooner or later, the corporations are going to get every type of music. They will dilute it, prepackage it, and recreate it in their over-perfected, soulless image. They did it to metal. They did it to rock ‘n roll, jazz, and Rhythm and blues. They even did it to hip hop. I was naive to think they wouldn’t try and succeed doing it to country. And as long as there are people willing to sell their souls to the machine for profit and acceptance, it will never change. The only thing we traditional country music fans can do is refuse the existence of this insulting farce of what we love and simply give all our support to those who do country music the right way. Because trust me, all the effort in the world is not going to change the fact the corporations have too much power and cannot be stopped head on.
Darryl Ryan
September 2, 2015 @ 2:02 pm
Well written article