Dumbass Thief Caught Trying to Return Kacey Musgraves’ Stolen Boots — Pants Still Missing
All’s well that ends well for country music starlet Kacey Musgraves. The songwriter and Texas native was the victim of a boot snatching on Monday, January 4th in Nashville after a thief smashed out the window of her car parked across the street from the 3rd and Lindsley music venue, and made off with a brand new pair of Lucchese boots, and another pair of Charlotte Olympias, together valued at about $900.00. Along with the broken window, Kacey was out about $1,400 total from the incident. “Someone had expensive tastes and cheap standards,” Musgraves tweeted out Monday after the incident.
Well luckily the stolen loot was recovered when 30-year-old Darnell Cunningham walked into the Lucchese Boots on 12th Avenue South in Nashville and tried to return the stolen merchandise, complete with the receipt with Kacey’s name on it. The store manager also recognized the boots as being the ones belonging to Musgraves. When the manager began to question Cunningham, he grabbed the boots and attempted to flee the scene. Now he’s been booked into the Metro Jail with a bond of $25,000, and has been charged with theft of property. “Stupidity leads to victory,” Musgraves tweeted out Thursday (1-7) morning.
The next question is if we’ll still get the song Musgraves promised after the theft first occurred. “Next up: a song about stolen boots. Not sure if there’s anything more country,” Musgraves said at the time.
Now that the boots portion of the caper has been solved, perhaps investigators will move on to the question of where Kacey Musgraves’ pants have gone? She first showed up pantless at the CMA awards in November, and in recent stage performances, including at the Grand Ole Opry, Kacey has come out on stage in just skivvies from the waist down.
Let’s hope this is a thief they never catch (hubba hubba).
January 7, 2016 @ 10:29 am
Maybe I am off base but why is she dressed liek a pop star.. Maybe Katy perry rubbed off on her.
I don’t mind a western outfit but a little bit of modest would be great…. Though she is a pretty individual.
January 7, 2016 @ 4:25 pm
Her whole act is basically “Country Music Katy Perry.”
January 7, 2016 @ 10:57 am
That last line is something I picture a bro country act saying. Then the majority of people saying their sexist and misogynistic. (If that’s how you even spell that)
January 7, 2016 @ 11:54 am
No Bro-Country act is going to say “hubba hubba.” You know why? Because it’s completely stupid.
January 7, 2016 @ 12:55 pm
the FGL guys might Hubbard Hubbard though…
January 7, 2016 @ 8:02 pm
Only real Bro-Country act to say something along those lines is Big & Rich but theirs is more “What what”
January 7, 2016 @ 11:01 am
One of the things I love about your writing, Trig, is how you always call out misogyny from the bro country douchebags. But it loses its bite when all your Kacey articles (and other beautiful female artists) include objectifying language.
January 7, 2016 @ 11:03 am
She’s the guilty party here. She’s supposed to set a good example for all women, but instead she just empowers the idea that women have to expose themselves by dressing this way.
January 7, 2016 @ 12:04 pm
I don’t know, does Kacey Musgraves really have that young of a fanbase? I’m sure she has young fans, but it seems to me that most of her fans are beyond the age where you or I need to worry about artists “setting a good example” for them. I mean if she was going the Taylor Swift route of pumping out tunes that appeal to tweens and kids, then I could somewhat see your argument (though I loathe the idea of parents relying on anyone, but themselves to set an example for their children), but Kacey Musgraves sound and subject matter seems more aimed at traditional Country fans, the NPR crowd and–quite frankly–hipsters. I don’t see her crossing over much with the Nicki Minaj, Katy Perry, Taylor Swift crowd much no matter how many shows she opens for one of them.
January 7, 2016 @ 12:48 pm
Parents can try their best to set a good example, but the average kid spends ten times the amount of time at school or other places than with its parents.
And yes, I’m assuming that the average Kacey Musgraves fan is either young, a hipster, a liberal, or a young hipster or young liberal. Or a young hipster liberal. She’s one of many people who is drawing to Country Music an audience not normally interested in the genre: left-wingers. Unlike the bros, who draw rock fans, punks, and people who just want to be cool, Musgraves draws in people whose politics and lifestyle choice is contrary to the majority of what most of us would consider the “Country Music” demographic. So to say she’s aimed at “traditional Country fans” is a bit misleading, although the NPR and Hipster bit is dead on.
I don’t see Musgraves and Taylor Swift having much of a fan-base overlap unless Swift herself makes it a point, because her legions of fans are so rabid and so intense that the less-reasonable among them make it out to belittle every single other entertainer, especially the ones they perceive as encroaching on Taylor’s niche in the music industry.
January 7, 2016 @ 5:59 pm
I have a few quibbles with your comment, Fuzzy. First of all, no self respecting punk would ever be drawn to bro-country. (unless you’re not referring to fans of punk music, and actually just mean dirtbags, in which case I’d agree.) Second, I think Kacey’s music can definitely appeal to traditional country fans if they would take the time to listen to her music. I’m a life-long country fan, and quite enjoy some of Kacey’s music. She’s not my favorite artist by a long shot, but she may very well be the absolute best thing in mainstream country right now.
January 7, 2016 @ 6:26 pm
Yes, I meant punks as in dirtbags, the kind who wear their pants down around their ankles, hats the wrong way, and those stupid shirts that have the sown sleeves so it looks like they have two shirts. I didn’t mean fans of punk music, much of which I really enjoy.
January 8, 2016 @ 1:37 am
So, in other words, you are agreeing with Mike W’s contention that few of her fans are children.
January 8, 2016 @ 7:43 am
The losers who wear their pants too low and their hats the wrong way probably should not be considered adults.
January 9, 2016 @ 4:42 am
Ha, that’s a funny comment!
January 7, 2016 @ 2:29 pm
Who the fuck says she needs to “set an example”?
Kacey Musgraves is responsible for Kacey Musgraves, and what she wants to wear (or not wear) is entirely her business.
You’d think she’d have killed off that “role model” noise after the tenth reference to how much bud she smokes…i.e. before the halfway point of her debut record.
Also, the reason she sells so many albums, despite not being played on the radio, is that she simultaneously appeals to both traditional country fans and the “I usually don’t like country, but” Americana crowd by marrying smart, provocative lyrics to a proudly trad-country style.
January 7, 2016 @ 2:32 pm
When she’s in the public eye she has an obligation to the impressionable minds who might be paying attention to demonstrate proper adult behavior.
January 7, 2016 @ 2:52 pm
…says who?
The third line of the first verse of the first song of her first album begins:
“Light ’em up and smoke ’em if you had ’em.”
She’s never claimed to be a role model, or cultivated a “wholesome” vibe.
I don’t see you saying that Evan Felker “has an obligation to the impressionable minds who might be paying attention to demonstrate proper adult behavior” on the other article, when alcohol abuse is far more damaging to a young person’s life than wearing a one-piece swimsuit in public.
January 7, 2016 @ 3:43 pm
No. She doesn’t.
January 7, 2016 @ 3:48 pm
I don’t know the whole Evan Felker story, that whole mess may blow over.
But Musgraves has repeatedly done something that is harmful towards our desire to move towards gender equality, which is identify herself as something to be looked upon.
Regardless of what she’s claimed to be she is doing the same thing that Lambert and Swift do, which is market herself in ways which are wholly unacceptable in terms of how we treat women.
She needs to let her music speak for itself.
Of course if she did that then she wouldn’t have a career.
January 9, 2016 @ 7:27 pm
What she’s wearing is fine. It could be worse, it could be nearly nothing but electrical tape over her nipples and a thong riding a huge wrecking ball and twerking with Beetlejuice.
January 12, 2016 @ 4:40 am
People used to spout the same nonsense about Guns ‘n’ Roses, that they had to behave for the kids. I disagree. I listened to G’n’R nonstop as my kid was growing up. Sweet Child was acceptable for her to hear. One in a Million and Your Crazy were not. My job, not Axl’s. If they had sensors their output or behavior for your virgin ears they wouldn’t have been GnR. Not an expert on Ms Musgraves lyrics, but I support her right to speak her mind and I support my right to do my job as a parent by either monitoring what my kid listens to or explaining the content to help them navigate right versus wrong. My kid is now 25 and she has a clean record and is a productive part of society. The Gunners did not corrupt her to badly.
January 7, 2016 @ 3:52 pm
As a woman (with a daughter) I find this comment off base. First off, as others pointed out, she is under no obligation to be a role model, and I don’t think is targeting children with her music and lyrics. Young women for sure. But a talented woman who likes to show off her nice legs is in no way a negative role model for young women, in my opinion. Now, depending on where your morals and issues fall, you may take exception to aspects of Kacey Musgraves. But simply wearing short skirts and being a positive role model are not mutually exclusive.
January 7, 2016 @ 4:53 pm
When did we get the notion that artists are supposed to be “examples”, and that fans “have to” imitate their favorite artist?
This is a culture founded on individual expression, not lemming-like conformism.
January 7, 2016 @ 5:02 pm
What individual expression? everything in our society is conformism. The schools do it to each and every child, their peers teach them what’s cool and what isn’t.
Our celebrities are obligated to be good role models because our kids spend more time in schools than with their parents. Every day in the life of a sixth grader is a constant bombardment of the current media happenings and the media machine that promotes lies about Brantley Gilbert’s donations or ignores Jason Aldean’s racism, sexism, and all around crimes against rational intelligent people everywhere. These kids will grow up in a world in which all they see is Hollywood’s fabrications: Miley Cyrus twerking, Musgraves dressing like a tramp, Luke Bryan promoting drunk driving, or Thomas Rhett’s stalking. They’ll grow up believing that these are acceptable behaviors made by rational people. These are unacceptable behaviors made by delinquents.
January 8, 2016 @ 1:47 pm
Some people overemphasize the amount of responsibility that celebrities have for raising other people’s children. Some parents shouldn’t have been parents.
January 8, 2016 @ 9:22 pm
Agreed. But the amount of time children spend exposed to the media and their peers far outweighs the time spent with their parents.
January 7, 2016 @ 11:52 am
Jesus. Can nobody pick up on the screaming sarcasm? Have I cultivated such a high brow readership lately that we can’t have any fun whatsoever? I mean if “hubba hubba” isn’t a loud, screeching siren shooting off fireworks that it’s obviously bullshit, then I don’t know what is. Guess what folks, Kacey Musgraves pants weren’t stolen. I’m sorry if I misrepresented that in the article.
If Kacey Musgraves doesn’t want to be a “victim” of misogyny, then perhaps maybe she should put on a pair of freaking pants. The reason she isn’t wearing pants is because she wants folks to pay attention. Excuse me for pointing that out. I was hoping maybe we could broach an objective dialogue here about if her dress is appropriate for country music, especially on the Opry stage, etc. But instead it’s about how I’m a misogynist asshole. I mean, after all the battles I’ve fought for the women in country here, you’re really going to accuse me of this?
And P.S., not “all” of my Kacey articles include objectifying language about Kacey. 90% of the time I haven’t even mentioned her looks or dress. But Kacey works very hard to put together elaborate stage costumes. It is part of her music and motif, and is fair to comment on no different than any other artist, male or female.
January 7, 2016 @ 12:01 pm
Does anyone ever get on Dolly Parton for her oversized bolt-ons and absurdly tight and low-cut outfits?
January 7, 2016 @ 12:25 pm
That’s why I think Kacey’s dress is is a very interesting case study. On the surface, it’s easy for folks to attack her for sexualizing herself, being inappropriate for country, for being a “pop star” or whatever. But in truth, there’s some historical precedent to what she’s doing, including Dolly Parton’s legacy. Kacey and her band are all dressing very, very traditional—her pants notwithstanding. It’s like the music from her last album. For the most part, it was traditional, or traditionally-leaning country. Yet previously, she’s used her music to broach these progressive ideals, which hypothetically, is counter-intuitive. That is, until you listen to some of Loretta Lynn’s work. Kacey Musgraves is creating this very provocative atmosphere around her which keeps people talking, and is part and parcel with her music. I’m not saying I approve or disapprove. I’m not really sure what to make of it frankly. But I think it’s incredibly interesting. You know, as the Bro-Country misogynist I am. 🙂
January 7, 2016 @ 2:55 pm
Yeah, I’d honestly be interested to read an article about it.
January 10, 2016 @ 10:26 pm
I LOVE the fashion of country music. It has always been an important aspect of the genre and I hope it always will be. It was only a matter of time before someone was smart enough to bring the rhinestones back and I wasn’t at all surprised when I saw Kacey using costuming in this fun/traditional way. Jenny Lewis was the first to drive me mad with jealousy when she put out this HeeHaw inspired video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRpScJzx41U
January 7, 2016 @ 4:12 pm
I do criticize Dolly for that, but most regular readers just think I’m a paranoid fanatic.
I also applaud her recording albums like “9 to 5.”
January 8, 2016 @ 8:43 am
Actually, Dolly herself jokes about it.
January 7, 2016 @ 12:24 pm
Personally, I identify as hubba-kin; my pronouns are hu, hub, and ba; and it triggers me when you say “hubba hubba” because it is insensitive to the struggles of other hubba-kin. Also, Kasey Musgraves not wearing pants triggers me because I also identify as pant-kin and consider it insensitive to not wear pants around those that enjoy wearing pants. I also identify as trigger-kin, so anyone using Trigger as a name is clearly mocking my identification as trigger-kin.
January 7, 2016 @ 2:33 pm
Pfffft XD *falls down laughing*
January 7, 2016 @ 3:56 pm
I like Trigger’s response here, except that I completely disagree that dressing how she does means it’s somehow ok for her to be a victim of misogyny (not that there was any present in this article.) I’m pretty sure she could wear a set of pasties made out of pot leaves and still not deserve to be a victim of misogyny. She may deserve criticism, but not misogyny.
So see- I warned you my feminist radar is always up.
January 9, 2016 @ 7:32 pm
What she’s wearing is fine. What yo said is fine. If you had said something like “I like the way her tits and ass look in that outfit” then I could understand some backlash. People need to lighten up. To bad everyone has to be so PC now and it seems to be getting worse. A lot worse.
So, in regards to what Kacey has been wearing lately, “hubba hubba.”
January 7, 2016 @ 3:44 pm
I am rather sensitive to sexism and misogyny and took absolutely zero issue with what was written here. It came off as a campy compliment and nothing more. And believe me, my feminist radar is always up. But there’s a line.
January 8, 2016 @ 4:36 am
So what the Kacey critics are ultimately saying is….. She’s not “Pagent Material”. Well, she wrote a song about that very thing, I believe.
I didn’t know we stepped back to 1955 all of a sudden with our standards here.
In addition to the aforementioned Dolly Parton, might I direct your attention to the classic album covers of Charley McClaine, or – God forbid – the really creepy sexualization of Tanya Tucker when she wasn’t even old enough to drive.
In other words, there’s nothing new under the sun, y’all.
Maybe Kacey ought to cover “Harper Valley P.T.A.” in response to all this. 🙂
January 7, 2016 @ 11:03 am
I see this one ending up on John Boy & Billy’s “Dumb Crook News.”
I thought her new outfits went along with the “Pageant Material” theme. They look like they should be in the swimsuit portion of a competition.
January 7, 2016 @ 12:05 pm
I’ve Been Everywhere just makes me think of Tim Horton’s…https://youtu.be/Ypirx2Zfg4M
January 7, 2016 @ 12:30 pm
Haha. Trigger, you can’t win for losing. For what it’s worth, I took your comments as tongue in cheek, and wouldn’t have thought anything of it.
As for Kacey’s outfits? Look, they are a part of her whole entertainment package. She certainly isn’t the first female country artist to go that route, though perhaps she’s taking it to a different level. I don’t believe she should be the subject of misogyny or have her musical and intellectual accomplishments minimized based on how she looks and dresses. But, when you show off your body (and you have a nice one) you expect and probably want to hear some appreciation. I think it’s fine to say that she is a talented AND sexy artist. Again, it’s one part of how she is choosing to market herself at this time.
January 7, 2016 @ 2:34 pm
Hell, look at Carrie’s new album cover.
She’s openly Christian, has been happily married since the age of 26 and just had a kid last year.
Is she a “bad role model” because she proudly displays one of the nicest pairs of legs that any of us will ever see?
Absolutely not.
January 7, 2016 @ 3:03 pm
Yep, Lester. Sara Evans is another example, a Christian and a conservative and has always shown a lot of herself. And she’s got some fantastic legs, too (and more importantly, one of my favorite voices of all time).
We’re just schizophrenic in this country when it comes to sex. We sell it on every corner, but are expected to act like we’re ashamed of it at the same time.
Women have it worst. Let’s be honest. We want them to dress provocatively, then we turn around and shame them for it. Or, we mock them if they dress conservatively. They can’t win.
January 7, 2016 @ 4:09 pm
AMEN!! I can’t stand album art that involves these daft schmucks all gauded up like some movie that used a woman’s body to cover up bad acting or a bad screenplay.
Dolly Parton has more talent than Loretta, Tammy and Connie Smith combined and she performs garbage like “The Bargain Store.”
Loretta, on the other hand, is pretty far removed from my list of favorite female vocalists (I’ll admit to hating “Louisiana Woman, Mississippi Man”) but she was a classy lady with some self-respect.
January 8, 2016 @ 9:17 am
Just because a woman dresses in a way that YOU deem inappropriate doesn’t mean she doesn’t have self respect. “Classy” means nothing-it’s just a way for people to try and control how women act in public. Do you think that even young girls look at Dolly and Kacey and think “I’m going to wear a swimsuit or low cut rhinestone top in public?” Do you think that singers have an obligation to not sing about any “unwholesome” activity because it might encourage kids to do the same, or is that just reserved for women who act in a way that you don’t approve of?
January 7, 2016 @ 12:47 pm
Let the woman wear what she wants.
A man might kill someone over his cowboy boots, theif really got off easy.
By the way congrats on writing your first article in a long while with out mentioning Chris what’s his face.
January 7, 2016 @ 1:23 pm
Ehh she can wear what she likes. If she thinks it’s a cute stage outfit, more power to her. I think compared to quality of music, the topic of appearance is pretty irrelevant.
January 7, 2016 @ 1:28 pm
It’s completely relevant if she chooses to enforce the notion that it’s acceptable to dress like this in public.
January 7, 2016 @ 4:45 pm
It is acceptable. Deal with it. How other people dress is none of our business.
January 7, 2016 @ 4:58 pm
reallly?
we have revealing swimsuits designed for 5-yr olds. We have children’s programming than encourages dating and disrespecting parents. The tv commercials always use revealing women, so do the movies.
We have a problem of kids being brought up to think that these behaviors are acceptable.
What do you think the 13 year olds who listen to Jason Aldean will grow up to be like?
What do you think the girls who hear about Kacey in middle school and see her doing this bullshit will grow up and dress like?
Are these the people we’ll want voting? leading our companies?
January 7, 2016 @ 7:18 pm
Yes it really is acceptable, part of the whole free country thing you guys have going on… You don’t have to like it, but it doesn’t mean you get to dictate morality for everyone else. Any parent that doesn’t want their children to grow up thinking certain things they see in popular culture are ok has every right to actually BE a parent and raise their children. You know there are countries where dressing certain ways is actually forbidden, there isn’t a huge lineup to get in…
January 7, 2016 @ 7:27 pm
“You know there are countries where dressing certain ways is actually forbidden, there isn”™t a huge lineup to get in”¦”
Lots of primitive Bedouins are lining up to get into France…
January 7, 2016 @ 10:05 pm
Fuzzy, we have a fundamental disagreement on this topic. I do not believe that there is any such thing as “acceptable” and “unacceptable” behavior regarding dress or [consensual] sexual lifestyle. Such matters certainly have nothing to do with whether one is morally worthy when it comes to voting or running companies. In my opinion, morality about how one treats others. We should teach children to value themselves as independent-thinking individuals and shape their own lifestyle rather than blindly copying celebrities, peers, or even family members. They would do well to heed Kacey’s advice:
“Follow your arrow wherever it points.”
January 8, 2016 @ 7:54 am
Eric:
We are adults, they are children. Their rights to be brought up knowing how to respect people and not to devalue themselves supercede our rights of free expression.
By your logic celebrities should be able to do and say what they want in front of children, because free speech, but never be held responsible for the effects that might have on the children.
By your logic, clothing companies should routinely create and market products that devalue women, market them to children, and never be held responsible for creating a generation of women with no self-respect who have been brought up believing its okay to be objectified, because free expression.
I know its the parents job, but most kids spend more time at school where their peers expose them to these celebrities than at home with their parents.
And no, I don’t hate freedom of speech, I embrace it and defend it regularly, but I think a child’s right to learn responsibility, respect, and value for women supercede Jason Aldean’s right to publicly degrade women and disrespect others.
January 8, 2016 @ 8:04 am
Libertines usually end up in an alley with a needle in their arm, bludegeoned to death my their mistress’s husband, or hanging from a doorway with a belt around their neck in a case of autoerotic asphyxiation gone horribly right. At least they die doing what they love…
January 9, 2016 @ 5:07 am
Let’s not make this into a political issue about the First Amendment. The argument that one’s right to not be disgusted trumps another’s right to free expression is no different from the argument made by the race-obsessed whiners at certain university campuses that “hate” speech should be banned. Let’s instead take back this subject to the sphere of purely personal morality.
Clothing, just like musical genre, is a matter of personal taste. Just like we do not judge instrumental styles by their “morality” or “acceptability”, neither should we judge dress in those terms. Nor does clothing have anything to do with “self-respect”. The only way that the two could be connected is if one believes in the outdated notion that a woman’s worth depends on her role as a sexual gatekeeper. Many females naturally enjoy sex just as much as males, and there is no lack of “self-respect” in them displaying their bodies in a manner that attract males, just like males are not showing a lack of “self-respect” by trying to change the minds of females who have already rejected them.
I have more to say about this matter, but I don’t want to dwell too long on it since this whole discussion is a major diversion from the topic of the thread. On a more germane note, I found Kacey’s performance on the Late Show yesterday to be absolutely lovely. I watch Colbert regularly, but his musical choices have been consistently disappointing, especially when compared to Letterman. Yesterday’s performance was the best that I have seen on the show thus far. This will show Colbert fans what real music sounds like:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HXih-D1KJgg
January 9, 2016 @ 7:25 am
Many females naturally enjoy sex just as much as males, and there is no lack of “self-respect” in them displaying their bodies in a manner that attract males, just like males are not showing a lack of “self-respect” by trying to change the minds of females who have already rejected them.
That liberal Ronnie Van Zant sang about that in the Lynyrd Skynyrd song On the Hunt: 😉
I know who you are baby
I know what they call you girl
Never put you down baby
I’m just like you baby, I’m on the hunt
January 8, 2016 @ 2:27 pm
@fuzzy… I think there’s been enough of men telling women what to wear.
January 12, 2016 @ 7:37 am
You should move to Saudi Arabia. You’d fit in great there and certainly be very happy with the way women are required to dress.
January 7, 2016 @ 1:38 pm
I’ve never thought she was all that her voice is Taylor crossed with Miranda (all completely barely average) and I can’t figure out her areyoumakingfunofcountry/pornstar wannabe getups she’s embarrassing plus.. Watch her on YouTube she is incredibly boring onstage which one of you designated her a star?
Dumb poseur popstar wannabe alert: who leaves overpriced boots like that in plain sight in their car? Third and Lindsley has always been in a sketchy area vagrants walk by constantly and the rescue missions a few blocks away I call Kacey mustbedumb
January 7, 2016 @ 2:39 pm
Everyone I know who’s seen her live has loved her show. She’s not a stadium-filler, she’s more of a packed coffee house singer-songwriter.
January 7, 2016 @ 5:28 pm
The stadium-fillers tend to be the lesser artists.
January 12, 2016 @ 7:41 am
You should not go see her or listen to her music then. I don’t get too excited about her particularly, but I don’t feel the need to judge her for her mode of dress or her music or live act. If you don’t like it, change the channel and don’t buy the product. People should spend less time babbling about their right wing conservative viewpoints on this site and just talk music.
January 7, 2016 @ 1:41 pm
Ps at least the thief left the bumpit… Or rats nest… She had in her hair a couple awards shows ago this chick needs a serious wakeup call… And a full length mirror
January 7, 2016 @ 4:33 pm
Haha even SCM isn’t safe from the P.C. Police these days!
I say you make a “Hottest Country Females” list and really piss em off.
HUBBA HUBBA!
January 8, 2016 @ 11:18 pm
I’m all for this and love seeing internet tears.
January 10, 2016 @ 3:06 pm
To be clear, are the PC Police in the thread the ones saying
“EGAD! Think of the CHILDREN, foul harlot!!”?
January 7, 2016 @ 5:27 pm
C’mon, Trigger. Cut being a wiseguy and send me Kacey’s pants so I can return them to her.
January 7, 2016 @ 11:49 pm
Well this comment section sure took a weird turn.
Anyway, I’m glad Kacey got her boots back.
January 8, 2016 @ 12:19 am
I’m in contact with a pedal steel guitar player from Texas who will be playing for Musgraves on Friday January 8th on Stephen Colbert’s show. I know him through his videos on Instagram and I also message him because I just bought a pedal steel too!
January 8, 2016 @ 4:11 am
Check your browser cache. There is a cookie in there, Matt–just for you!
January 8, 2016 @ 5:31 am
Ok. I made a comment here yesterday…WTH is it?!
January 8, 2016 @ 9:59 am
Not sure Jen. I didn’t delete it, and I just checked the spam and trash folders, and am not seeing anything. Sometimes there’s unforeseen technical errors. I apologize.
January 8, 2016 @ 5:47 am
Think she sounds and looks great and at least she knows what a country music songs is.
January 8, 2016 @ 6:28 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FONN-0uoTHI
January 8, 2016 @ 7:19 pm
Oh brother.
“Miley sets the bar. We try to reach the bar.”
“Don’t know if we want to touch that bar.”
Brad Paisley
January 8, 2016 @ 7:29 pm
If you dress like this broad, you want people to notice. Enough with all the P.C. Horseshit, hippies!
January 9, 2016 @ 11:31 pm
She needs to put some britches on.
January 10, 2016 @ 2:15 pm
As far as her act and wardrobe goes, Kacey has a niche for now. Apparently it’s working, too. If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.
January 12, 2016 @ 7:47 am
PS, unrelated but somewhat related, I often put cmt on for my dog at night (I do explain each time that it’s not real country music) and when I flipped it on, they were playing a video from Musgraves for the song she did with Willie Nelson. Maybe this is old news about the video, but I recall people saying on this site that that was the best track on the recent release and many predicting she would not release it as a single. Anyway, more power to her for that, I only caught part of the song but it sounded like the best thing I had heard by her yet (pants or no pants). My dog liked the video too, she’s a big Willie fan.