Endless Russia: The Emergence of the Permanent Political Media State
Another week, and another round of layoffs have hit entertainment media. Vice Media, which started as a government-funded magazine to cover music in Montreal, and now owns a vast multimedia empire valued at $5.7 billion, announced last week that it is laying off 60 employees, and specifically in its print staff to make way for more video-centric and international content.
Though the Vice layoffs will affect a wide array of the media company’s business, the two sectors that will feel the brunt are the sports division, which has been shuttered, and Vice’s Thump subdomain, which covers electronic music and will now be folded into the main Vice website. Vice says it will pull from its other channels to make up for the coverage losses.
“All good things come to an end,” said Jorge Arangure, editor-in-chief of Vice Sports on Friday (7-21). “Vice Sports will cease [to] exist as a site. And I will no longer work at Vice. It was a great run. Thanks for reading.”Â
The layoffs come as MTV and Fox Sports made similar moves recently to vacate print and personality spots on their employment rosters to save on payroll and make way for cheaper video production staff. The contraction in entertainment media is also being felt by decidedly smaller outfits like popshifter.com, which decided last week it will cease operations. Of the smaller blogs and websites that survived the late 2015 contraction in media due to the widespread adoption of ad blockers and the shift from Google to Facebook as the primary driver of web traffic, only a few are still holding on in the increasingly adverse economic environment for online publishing.
Amid the continued contraction in sports and entertainment coverage, from the massive layoffs recently at ESPN to the scores of smaller blogs and websites who’ve now called it quits, not enough is being made about how the Russian collusion controversy and the endless political news cycle surrounding it are undoubtedly pulling time and attention from the elective reading in the entertainment sector.
One consistency in the recent media contraction is it seems to be affecting sports and music disproportionately to other entertainment coverage such as celebrity news and gossip. Just like with Vice, which targeted both music and sports coverage for its layoffs, it seems like when one story about layoffs at a music outlet emerges, it is chased with similar news from a sports outlet. This is in contrast to the trend in previous years for music and entertainment outlets like Vice and Rolling Stone to add sports coverage to their beat due to the emerging popularity of sports commentary, or for sports outlets like Deadspin or ESPN’s now shuttered Grantland to add music and culture coverage to grow and diversify their audience.
But that was all before the polarizing 2016 election cycle. Even the NFL—which many believed was an untouchable juggernaut of entertainment with expectations for nothing but expansion well into the foreseeable future—experienced a surprising down tick in ratings last season, and caught many entertainment experts by surprise. The Presidential election was thought to have a significant effect on the ratings down slide.
After the election ended in November, and President Trump took office in February, prognosticators assumed a sense of normalcy would eventually return to the media space, and to life in America. However due to the Russia saga, no such shift has occurred. If anything, the polarization of American culture has only solidified.
The drama surrounding San Francisco 49’ers backup quarterback Colin Kaepernick’s refusal to stand during the National Anthem, or the various controversies surrounding ESPN and what some conservatives feel is a liberal agenda show that the polarization of the American population is not just drowning out information and interest in leisure and entertainment, it is permeating it. Similar controversies have gripped the music space, such as Beyoncé’s Album of the Year loss at the 2017 Grammy Awards, and the anger over Beyoncé being excluded from consideration in the Grammy Awards’ country music categories.
In the month of June, aside from a few moments, it felt like life, including in the entertainment world, was finally returning to some sense of equilibrium as the Russia story smoldered, but didn’t flare up as it had done in previous months. People were able to enjoy the NBA and NHL Finals in relative peace. But as recent new revelations in the Russian investigation have emerged, and the healthcare battle has heated up, the protracted political cycle is once again clogging the social media and news feeds of consumers, pulling attention away from entertainment, and turning the economics of covering anything but politics into a prohibitive proposition for media both big and small.
This leads to further polarization of the media, as media outlets feel the need to choose sides in the political battle, or begin to shift to more political-oriented coverage to lure in lost readers in the environment of endless polarization and seething political vitriol. This allows political cycle to become even more elongated and deeply-rooted, permeating throughout culture beyond the standard political boundaries.
However it’s hard to couch the media itself as a victim here, especially print media. Perhaps entertainment media is a victim, but it is print media that has been the catalyst for the slow drip of Russia coverage, driving the narrative, and insuring that a sense of normalcy cannot be realized by incrementally releasing developments through government leakers on a seemingly regular basis, and at times even seeming to checkmate positive news or moments of consensus or normalcy with fresh revelations.
Where newspapers such as The New York Times and The Washington Post were facing an existential threat in recent years due to the internet and alternative news sources, and the efficacy of the traditional print story delivered by professional journalists was severely in question, now all of a sudden these outlets are like the rock stars of the media, making one new revelation on the Russia story after another, and sitting in the driver’s seat of the national narrative.
Amid all the talk of media outlets emptying their offices of print journalists for savvy multimedia producers, print media in the political space is experiencing not just a renewal, but a Cambrian explosion of interest and productivity, and having profound effects on politics and culture like never before. Print media is also laying off art critics and lifestyle reporters for more political reporters, pundits and commentators. The information on the Russia story is not coming from the government, independent investigators, lawyers, or politicians in an official capacity. It is coming from local newspapers, resulting in an international impact on not just Russia, but an array of political subjects.
However the incessant march of political revelations in a purposeful trickle that won’t allow the public or the media to regain a sense of the normal news cycle is causing long-term, damning affects on how Americans fundamentally live their lives, and how they interface with each other, their communities, and engage in entertainment and leisure, through media coverage or directly.
Where before Americans were consumed with rooting for their favorite sports team or perhaps their favorite entertainer to win a Grammy or an Oscar, now their rooting interests are drawn down political lines. Though this level of political engagement may be seen as a positive compared to the apathy of eras past, or seen as important by either side because of the graveness of the matters, when the result is the constant undermining of each other’s goals based on political differences, and there’s no sportsmanship involved, the impact is not just less attention on elective activities in life such as music and sports, it’s the stultification of progress, and the seizing up of any actions that might result in sum positives for the American population, even when there is consensus.
The pursuit of happiness in America has been replaced by a national obsession to incessantly undermine the will of anyone seen as a political adversary. And similar to the Shia/Sunni conflict in the Middle East, the internal conflict had rendered the United States unable to pursue its collective will as a country, and has allowed it to become vacant on the international stage.
The accusations against the Trump Administration are grave and serious, and should be investigated. If that investigation is attempting to be impeded by the Administration, or politicized by any governmental entity, then the media should report on this. And in a Democracy, it is imperative on the media to police and report on these public institutions, especially if corruption or illegal activity is believed to be involved.
However as any investigator will tell you, leaking details of an ongoing investigation to the public, or attempting to try a case in the court of public opinion, only hinders the fact finding process, impedes the ability of all parties to fair action under the law, and overall is damaging to the pursuit of justice.
The intent of Russia in meddling in America’s 2016 Presidential election—if we are to believe the reports—was not just to help win the election of President Trump. It was to sow disharmony throughout the entire political process and to pit Americans against each other, with the results being the weakening of the United States, and its ability to project power around the world. Not in spite of the media coverage on Russia, but through it, the Russians have been able to achieve their goals of constant and endless disruption in American life by forcing everyone to choose a side, and to pay attention.
In this case, the incessant media coverage of the Russian issue, and the baiting of the American public by governmental leakers and their willing accomplices in the media, is not the workings of the checks and balances on power, it is the American media and their plants in the government working as unwitting pawns, doing the bidding of Russia to sow disharmony in both the government, and in public life.
The antidote to Russian meddling is not the incremental exposure of disjointed and incomplete facts through unnamed sources and still yet-to-be-revealed-evidence, it’s allowing the investigative process to move forward unimpeded by outside pressures, and soap-opera style leaks of gossip that are ultimately inconsequential to the efficacy of the investigation, and are more to feed the appetite of a public that wants to be polarized and angry at the other side of the political divide. There should be consensus in the need for a complete a thorough investigation where guilty parties can be brought to justice, or the accused can be ultimately exonerated. And the media should be a part of this process, not undermining it.
Granted, some believe disruption of society and government is the path forward for their particular political ideals. It just happens to be that if we are to believe all the reports on Russian meddling in the election, the Russians would agree. If the government can’t function effectively, then it’s less likely to get involved in Syria, The Ukraine, or other places where Russians are looking to take advantage of American discord.
There is a lot of quoting and comparisons of George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984 these days, especially in how propaganda and fake news seems to pervade the media cycle, revisionist history seems to be the rule of the day, the world seems to be under the thumb of crooked politicians, and surveillance of our every move and thought has reached levels that just a few years ago would have incited panic.
But one element of George Orwell’s iconic novel that is regularly left out of the comparisons is how the 1984 world was marked by endless conflict. In fact in the novel, the endless conflict is the reason that the ruling party deems it necessary to authorize deep intrusions into people’s personal lives, and receives it from a worried and fearful public. Whether there actually is a conflict, and the scale of it or the seriousness of the threat is left open to interpretation.
Similarly, today it feels like politics both domestic and international is in an endless cycle that now permeates every part of human life. It is no longer compartmentalized to political campaign seasons, or the political elements of the government and culture. It affects every sector, and demands every moment of our attention, including the elective ones, while the 50/50 division of opinion makes for the perfect environment for the media and politicians to implore the public to remain engaged, and to continue to pour money into the political industrial complex, lest the other side gain a slight advantage and end up in the majority.
Even when the Russian investigation resolves, no matter the outcome, it still may be years for the endless ripping of scars that has occurred through the dripping news cycle of this Russian collusion investigation to truly heal, if they ever do. The media has found its perfect story to keep the public continuously fearful, angry, polarized, and most importantly, engaged. After years of contraction due to the disparate nature of the internet and the emergence of countless independent outlets and social media, the media at large has now regained control of the public narrative through the Russian story. The question is when it’s all over—if it ever ends—will we be able to come back together to enjoy a baseball game, or a music concert together? Or will political polarization undermine the pursuit of happiness in America?
Fuzzy TwoShirts
July 24, 2017 @ 9:44 am
(deep breath. deep breath. deep breath)
(resists urge to go all political and insult people who disagree)
phew, calm again.
Anyway: good thoughts.
I feel like we are living in a constant state of “need attention”
and maybe part of that is, like George Orwell would have said, a mad-grab to distract or control the general public to make sure they are focusing on a certain thing instead of another thing.
BUT the ordinary way of expecting such a scenario would be that it’s the government producing said media, not government being criticized by said media.
I mean, it just doesn’t add up.
But as for how this affects music:
I was reading an article that only the most diehard partisans are exerting so much time and energy into the back and forth. the more moderate or less invested public (so… most people) are ignoring a lot of the blah blah blah.
so the idea that everybody is buying in is maybe misguided. most people are buying out.
they’re sick of it.
The way I’m sick of the endless back and forth about the identity of Country Music and Sam Hunt.
most people only want news that affects them, at this point.
AS I see it, the Orwellian panic that undertones this article is maybe exaggerating some of the symptoms.
“There is a lot of quoting and comparisons of George Orwell’s dystopian novel 1984 these days, especially in how propaganda and fake news seems to pervade the media cycle, revisionist history seems to be the rule of the day, the world seems to be under the thumb of crooked politicians, and surveillance of our every move and thought has reached levels that just a few years ago would have incited panic.”
can any of this be backed up?
how much has surveillance increased? what do the polls say about public support? is revisionist history reallya widely accepted thing?
because I was udner the impression that it was a very vocal minority making most of the stink about taking down monuments, and that a much more moderate crowd was remaining disinterested…
as for crooked politicians… didn’t Brexit and the Trump election indicate that crooked politicians were loosing their grip?
not that Trump ain’t crooked but in a crooked politician’s world Billary would have been President…
or am I not seeing something?
surveillance of our every move and thought? this seems exaggerated.
And the only real reference to music is an off-hand reference to music concerts tucked away in a paragraph…
does any of this affect concerts?
except those by artists who constantly want to spew their opinions?
aren’t most concerns politically neutral except in cases when the artist takes a stance and spews off on stage a la Natalie Maines?
I’m glad she’s not around feeding this fire. we have enough problems without a self-important crazy lady fanning the flames and getting into Twitter feuds with the President;
and like it or not he is the President. and we’re just going to have to duck and hope that he doesn’t get us into something too bad.
until 2020 when Oprah becomes President.
Lil Dale boring country music ombudsman of the yeer
July 24, 2017 @ 4:30 pm
go back to russia then boy they aint evan got no media over there
pinky
July 25, 2017 @ 5:09 am
Most Americans grew up understanding the social contracts under which the country operated..While i can’t remember voting for a president who actually won, life went on, and I didn’t take to the streets, nor did anyone else I knew.,Russia has always been a p.i.t.a., but somehow we all managed.
The current media a-holes are so consumed by hatred, they don’t care if the country falls apart. Believing in their own ‘specialness’, they forget that their own oxen will get gored too in the breakdown.
As to music and sports; check the price of tickets, now check average salaries, and voila! , this is not unrelated..Too few people have become way too big for their britches..
seak05
July 24, 2017 @ 10:00 am
Um, Trigger, the Wash Post and NYT are breaking these stories just as fast as they can. Remember they’re also competing against each other, and other media such as the WSJ, CNN (I’d say Fox but they refuse to cover it). Are you saying they should stop covering Russia, Healthcare etc so that we don’t have to think about it, and can enjoy music and sports in blissful ignorance?
BTW political scandals have nearly always been uncovered by the press, not through official channels. Shockingly official channels aren’t really interested in digging out scandals on those from the same political party…. & remember one party holds all the power (no Dems in the house cannot issue a subpoena).
But the idea that this is new is silly, you and I are both old enough to remember the endless investigation into the Clinton’s that lasted for nearly 6 years: from the foster’s to the land deal, to Lewinsky. And just slightly before that we had Reagan and the whole Iran situation.
seak05
July 24, 2017 @ 10:06 am
(also technically speaking the Kushner emails did come from an official source because Kushner published them himself when he learned the NYT was going to publish them the next day…..yet another argument against the orchestrated slow drip btw).
Trigger
July 24, 2017 @ 10:18 am
Even in this instance, as you illustrate, the media is driving the narrative, not the individuals. They are dealing with the realities presented by the media.
Kek
July 24, 2017 @ 4:02 pm
You are referring to Don Jr., not Kushner.
Trigger
July 24, 2017 @ 10:17 am
“Are you saying they should stop covering Russia, Healthcare etc so that we don’t have to think about it, and can enjoy music and sports in blissful ignorance?”
No.
““But the idea that this is new is silly, you and I are both old enough to remember the endless investigation into the Clinton’s that lasted for nearly 6 years: from the foster’s to the land deal, to Lewinsky. And just slightly before that we had Reagan and the whole Iran situation.”
The Clinton scandals were met by wholesale apathy throughout out culture, despite the media. See the voter turnouts in the 2000 election. Read the stories from the era where political apathy was at an all time high. And it wasn’t in spite of the Clinton scandal, it was because of it.
Seak05
July 24, 2017 @ 11:06 am
Than I’m not sure what you want from the media? Or is it that you want congress to also be investigating? But again historically most political scandal coverage has had a strong media investigative component. It’s basically the point of the free press.
I would say though that I think most of the public is fairly apathetic to Russia, or certainly not more interested in it than they were the Clinton sex scandals. A lot of the political engagement is really being driven by healthcare, which has proven to be a political engager in the past as well.
Trigger
July 24, 2017 @ 4:02 pm
The point of this article is to explain how the Russia story permeating every single news and social media feed is causing the evaporation of media coverage of virtually everything else.
It is a political tool to always compare one political scenario to another political scenario and say there is a double standard. That’s because all of politics is beset with double standards.
seak05
July 24, 2017 @ 4:45 pm
I mean, I’ve seen plenty of coverage on healthcare too. And I guarantee you’ll see a of stories tonight and tomorrow about Pres Trump turning the Boy Scout Jamboree into a political event, and a chance to take shots at a lot of people.
Tom Smith
July 24, 2017 @ 10:10 am
I would argue that we are beyond over-saturated with all types of media at this point. Mostly political media, but all types of entertainment as well. Sorry, but I can’t feel that bad about less media. In my humble opinion, the 24 hour news cycle has been one of the worst things to happen to our society. It’s built upon a foundation of ratings based on confrontation, outrage, the outrageous, gossip, and just plain useless information designed to fill air time. And it’s put us at each other’s throats.
Maybe we should shoot for quality over quantity. We’d all be better off if we just tuned out and turned off a little bit. We’ve been fed a lie that we need to know everything that is happening at every minute of the day. Try going media-free for a month. You’ll be a better person for it.
Jordan
July 24, 2017 @ 10:22 am
I have a ton of friends who cut the cord when ESPN went political and Kaepernick disrespectfully took a knee. I also have yet to see how Russia “hacked” the election, since most polls are counted individually and not on any hackable network.
It is funny though, Romney brought up Russia as a threat 4 years ago and the Obama made fun of him while the media swooned. Now that same media won’t talk about anything but Russia.
“But you like country music” – sunny Sweeney and brennen leigh
Mike
July 24, 2017 @ 10:54 am
I think the majority of the “Russia hacked the election” is less centered around a “hackable” network and more that Russia supported Assange who hacked the DNC, who had incriminating emails that slowly dripped out. Plus, Russia has been well-known to have individuals create truly “fake” news stories that are designed to discredit faith in American democracy/electoral system and confuse citizens. Russia has done this in other counties, I doubt they would abstain from doing this to the U.S.
Now, my argument would be the “average” American should hopefully be smart enough to figure out what is a credible news source and what is not. Sadly, we live in a nation that gets its news from Facebook and has forgotten the art of critical thinking.
As for Kaep, while I don’t disagree that his protest was “disrespectful”, I fully support his right to do so. Plus, the dude has been punished enough as evidenced by the fact a guy like Dan Orlovsky is getting a QB job and Kaep is still getting blackballed by the NFL owners.
I dislike ESPN, but I also feel they were in a tough spot with the political stuff. The mainstream media was covering Kaepernicks protest, ESPN would be hard-pressed not to cover it and still try to call themselves a “legit” sports news organization. I suspect ESPN has lost a lot more viewers due to the generally low quality of their programming, than their supposed political affiliations. I for one do not want to watch hour-after-hour of Stephen A. Smith and Skip Bayless spitting out stupid, ill-informed “hot takes” on if Lebron is better than Jordan.
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 11:39 am
Kaep isn’t blackballed. He opted out of his contract with the 49ers. The reason why he hasn’t been picked up is because no NFL team desires a major distraction in their backup QB. If Kaep had the talent of Brady or Carr, he would be starting.
Remember the NFL left Vick come back. They let Greg Hardy play. If you can play, the NFL doesn’t care about your personality. But if you can’t play well enough to overcome the distraction element than forget it. Same thing happened to Tebow. Now, Tebow wasn’t responsible for the firestorm. No, it was the media fueling the endless stories but NFL teams don’t care. Second stringers are like little children. To be seen and not heard. Kaep simply isn’t worth the amount of publicity and distraction.
Jimsouls
July 24, 2017 @ 3:12 pm
White people telling black people how to respond to the institutional racism they must endure every day. Ain’t that Murica?
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 4:28 pm
In cities, like Baltimore for example, where minorities hold key offices in every position?
Kaepernick looked foolish throughout his stance. He wore socks descripting the police as pigs, wore a Castro shirt and didn’t even vote in the election. His stance offered nothing to solve the problems that he claimed to be fighting.
This writer sat down with him and Kaep looked lost: http://www.miamiherald.com/sports/spt-columns-blogs/armando-salguero/article117033883.html
seak05
July 24, 2017 @ 5:52 pm
You literally know nothing about what happened in Baltimore, or Baltimore itself. Or why the cops in the Freddy Grey case got off, or how poor African-Americans in the city are treated by cops, most of whom don’t live in the city. Baltimore is where I grew up, it’s my hometown, go prattle on in your ignorance about your own.
Jimsouls
July 24, 2017 @ 6:39 pm
The issue is white people telling black people how to think about and react to what’s going on around them. Or, men doing the same to women.
As for th racial stuff, this much is clear. Trumpos base is united by one cause”: Make America White Again. It’s why they are willing to lose their own healthcare or don’t bat an eye each time 45 embarrasses our nation. This Bannon’s has role in our governemt: to keep these bigots united. Any hardcore Trump supporter who denies this is a liar.
Seak05
July 24, 2017 @ 3:50 pm
Tebow was bad. Following Denver he had chances with the Jets, Patriots, and Eagles. Kaepernick isn’t great, but he’s better than Tebow, which teams have given him a second chance? Exactly.
Also, comparing either Tebow or Kaepernick to Hardy? That’s just BS. Those situations are not similar (& I’m someone who is ok with allowing pple who have had arrests & even convictions to play).
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 4:20 pm
What chance with the Jets? He never even played QB while the team fell apart under Butt Fumble Sanchez. He did have tryouts with the Patriots and Eagles. But there is more to Tebow.
https://thelacesout.com/why-no-one-in-the-nfl-wants-tim-tebow-26d93b674ab5?gi=265887f079de#.dd3rxclsy
I explained why teams aren’t interested in Kaepernick. He isn’t worth the distraction that his position entails. I went to two NFL message boards and both boards came to the same conclusion. He is not worth it. He is an aging QB who requires a different kind of offense to run. He is not a typical drop back and throw QB. Most teams prefer their backup to be similar to their starter. That is why my Raiders wouldn’t sign him. Also, our WR Crabtree hates the guy and Kaep stole Aldon Smith’s (our suspended DE) girl.
Reading comprehension. Try it out. I didn’t compare them to Hardy. I used Hardy and Vick as examples to show that the NFL does not give a CRAP if a player kills dogs or beats up women, just as long as they can perform at a high enough level to overcome any distractions or negative publicity. Or if they are desperate enough to win i.e Cowboys (Jerry Jones) signing Hardy.
And what people are missing is that Kaepernick gave up his job. He had an option with the Niners and he left. That was his mistake.
Seak05
July 24, 2017 @ 11:02 am
If your friends “cut the cord” bc of espn going political that must mean they were shelling out 50+ dollars a month just to watch espn. That is not the majority of cord cutters.
Toby in AK
July 25, 2017 @ 5:00 pm
Professional sports is one of the last holdouts to the “cutting the chord” movement because of how they handle their licensing. All the pro sports leagues have tried to avoid the move away from cable and it worked to a point. “That must mean they were shelling out 50+ dollars a month just to watch espn”. I think you’d be surprised at how many people only have cable to watch sports, anything else is fairly easy to find online.
Although the whole politics issue is a little overblown, there are definitely people who cut espn because of the politics. I’m not out to prove that but in addition to the anecdotal evidence, they have done some polling to measure the effect and you can look it up if you care.
seak05
July 25, 2017 @ 5:04 pm
I wholeheartedly agree with you that many people keep cable for sports, but sports and espn are not synonyms. In fact of the sports channels ESPN is the easiest to get post cord cutting (with sling tv etc). Now say your local baseball and basketball teams are much harder. ESPN doesn’t exactly have a ton of live premium sports programing now a days if you haven’t noticed.
Seak05
July 24, 2017 @ 11:10 am
How on earth do you justify espn not covering Kapernick kneeling btw? Oh and politics and sports have always been entertained (same with music). And how is Kapernick more of a problem for you than NFL players committing DV, assault, battery,
DUI etc. since I’m assuming you still watch the NFL.
Jordan
July 24, 2017 @ 11:15 am
He’s not. Different subject.
True. I cut the cord two years ago cause it was controlling my life
Mike Obama also did this in Israel and nobody batted an eye. And I would argue that was leaked info we needed to know
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 12:59 pm
Yeah. Obama tried to influence the election of our best ally in the Middle East and nobody really cared.
Jared S
July 24, 2017 @ 2:08 pm
The State Department provided funding to an NGO that seeks to support peace negotiations between Israel and Palestine. The organization may have used some of the funds to support a political campaign against Netanyahu.
You claim “Obama tried to influence the election of our best ally.” Do you have any evidence that he did any such thing, or are you just pointing to what may be a coincidence without any direct involvement of the President and saying, “Look! He’s guilty too!!!”?
merf
July 24, 2017 @ 1:04 pm
No, no, seak, you don’t understand. Politics and sports can mix as long as the result doesn’t make people feel uncomfortable. Unless those people are liberals, but liberals aren’t really people anyway, right haha LOL!!11 Flyovers/military displays and “exploitative bullsh**t” (my serviceperson sibling’s words, not mine) staged reunions of military and their families for everyone!
/s
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 1:07 pm
The National Anthem represents America to most people. It represents a flag they themselves for or that family members and friends fought for. It is a powerful symbol. Its value can’t be compared to players committing criminal acts.
And actually, the number of NFL players that are involved in criminal acts is lower than the national average. I am trying to remember the article where I saw that stat. The NFL just receives more publicity.
seak05
July 24, 2017 @ 3:08 pm
Neither the national anthem nor the flag represent America, they represent the ideals that America stands for. US servicemen and women don’t fight and die for the flag or the anthem, they fight and die for the ideals the country stands for. Never make the symbol more important than what it symbolizes.
One of those ideals is freedom of speech. As someone who loves America, you should be standing up and shouting for CK’s right to protest, even if you don’t agree with what he’s doing. That’s American, that’s being patriotic. And that’s why many service people took to social media to defend him.
(and yes you are correct about the NFL having a lower rate of violence, but one Domestic violence offender is worse than a person protesting the flag, so if one person is enough to piss you off, than perhaps that should be what does it).
WRS
July 24, 2017 @ 4:31 pm
I believe if CK wanted to bring attention to an issue he could have chosen a better way than what he did, but that’s just my opinion. He had the right to do what he did even if you disagree with him. It wouldn’t be freedom of speech if you couldn’t say or express yourself if people disagreed with you. We here in America are very fortunate to have this freedom. I think most people that disagreed with CK weren’t saying he shouldn’t have been able to do what he did, they just disagreed with what he did. I think burning the flag is deplorable but I also think you should have the right to do so if you choose. I also think it’s ironic that we are on a music blog talking about freedom of speech and CK, and he likes to wear Che Guevara shirts who hated music, freedom of speech, was a racist and bigot among other things.
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 4:36 pm
You are arguing semantics. The flag and the national anthem are tangible symbols that represent America. When people think of America, they think of the flag and anthem.
And in the days where flags were carried on the battlefields, people did literally die for the flag. Some Medal of Honor citations were given because a soldier saved the flag or captured the enemy’s flag.
You have no right to tell me what I should do. I never said he couldn’t protest. So scratch that.
I never said Kaep was worse than domestic violence or assault. I never said I stopped watching the NFL because of Kaep. Quit speculating on my behalf.
seak05
July 24, 2017 @ 4:43 pm
No it’s not semantics, not even remotely. The ideas are what’s important; not the song (of which we leave out the part where it glorifies slavery, fyi), or the flag. They are literally only important because of the ideas. If America turned into a dictatorship, the flag means nothing.
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 11:47 am
Oh yeah, I remember that. The Cold War called for their policy back.
The media laughed and laughed. Made Romney out to be a fool.
Bunch of hypocrites. The free press: more like free of any responsibility press.
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 11:42 am
I don’t feel sorry for the media. They created their own mess. Every single incident was blown up beyond its proportion. They kept this Russia narrative going based on nothing but their own desires. A Harvard study shows how historically negative their coverage of President Trump has been. People are tired of the bull crap.
Corncaster
July 24, 2017 @ 11:44 am
it’s a nothingburger (van jones) designed to slow the Trump administration and give the bankrupt DNC some thread to hold onto for survival — but all the so-called progressives (see: Venezuela) will be fine because their uniparty bow-tied republican asshats are in the end the same breed: feckless idiotic self-interested politicians who can’t be trusted with a lawn service much less the Free World
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 11:51 am
I remember where a friend once said about the two parties:
Democrats: evil party
Republicans: stupid party (as in being unable to get their promises accomplished, not their policies in general.)
So true.
RD
July 24, 2017 @ 12:33 pm
There are two parties. The evil party and the stupid party. Occasionally they get together and do something that is both stupid and evil, that is called bipartisanship. I saw Sam Francis say that, but I’m not sure if he said it first.
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 12:57 pm
Indeed.
The Republicans had years to develop a plan to save health care and they didn’t. Stupid.
RD
July 24, 2017 @ 5:29 pm
The Republicans only want to conserve all of the evil things that the Democrats did yesterday. We have only the party of the revolutionary Left and the party of the extreme Left. The middle and the right have absolutely no representation.
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 11:55 am
Let’s be honest about this Russia story. It is an excuse that the Left and friends are using to explain why Queen Hillary lost on her way to the coronation. It couldn’t be that she was a terrible, corrupt candidate who ran a lackluster campaign or that the common people have grown weary of being ignored and told to stuff it by politicians who don’t give a damn about them. Nope, it had to be some outside force. They will ignore the contents of those emails. That is not important at all.
#TeamOverCountry as usual for them.
scott
July 25, 2017 @ 5:48 am
The. Truth.
ShadeGrown
July 24, 2017 @ 12:09 pm
I don’t see it ever changing cause nowadays if you have a different ideology the other side labels you as a bad person. And if you have a different ideology the other side labels you as either a snowflake or Trumper and in their eyes you can’t possibly have voted for anyone different than Clinton or Trump. You can’t possibly agree with Trump or Hillary about anything without supporting everything they’ve ever done or said. This trend has been getting steadily worse since the 90s and there’s no end in site.
Nate
July 24, 2017 @ 6:48 pm
Exactly, as soon as a Republican Congressman opposes Trump on ONE thing, not everything, just one thing, they are labeled as a RINO and disowned by the party for some reason. This is why Paul Ryan and the likes don’t have any balls. Nobody wants to stand up when Trump says/does something stupid and risk losing reelection. It’s no different in the Democratic party either. Just look at how much Hillary feminists loathe Bernie bros. And that’s just interparty. When you start going Democrat vs Republican it’s an even bigger mess.
Robert Hill
July 24, 2017 @ 12:10 pm
Trigger,
A fine write-up, but your historical context for polarization is a bit short. Let’s head back nearly 30 years and discuss Rush Limbaugh.
At his peak, he had greater than 20 million listeners, and even today he has over 13 million listeners. Talkers Magazine as the greatest of all time, and he continues to have tremendous influence on public discourse. Limbaugh is fully credited with paving the way for all other conservative talk shows from Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Michael Savage, Hugh Hewitt, Laura Ingraham, Glenn Beck, Dennis Prager, Lars Larson, and others. He also is credited with highlighting the need for a conservative news outlet, and thus became FoxNews. Lastly, his foray in to writing books opened up the door to Ann Coulter and many, many others. But what Limbaugh should be most credited for is beginning the era of thoroughly villainizing and disparaging those who are not conservatives.
Rush Limbaugh started a movement to mainstream the idea that “Us and Them” is simply conservative vs liberal (or Republican vs Democrat). Taking a page out of Saul Alinsky (and yes, conservatives love this book too), Limbaugh bit hard on the rule that “ridicule is man’s most potent weapon.” Liberals were no longer fellow Americans who needed to be convinced of conservative ideals. No, Limbaugh normalized the belief that liberals/Democrats were not real Americans, nor were they patriotic. Instead, “those people” undermined traditional American values and were all poising to launch socialism or some other type of totalitarianism that would create a “1984” American of government control. Simply, liberalism (and liberals) were the enemy of America.
I know this because I started listening to Limbaugh in the early 1990s. However, I never imagined that even Limbaugh’s vitriol would spawn the unrelenting attacks that hosts like Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, Glenn Beck, and Michael Savage (all with millions of daily listeners) would unleash toward non-conservatives. To underscore this, it was amazing that in 2016 Glenn Beck realized what he had done and apologized for it. And please note that I have not addressed that vast network of conservative news and opinion sites like Drudge, Breitbart, WND, NewsMax, Townhall, Daily Wire, Red State, The Federalist, etc, who generally begin and end each day with a mantra of “evil liberals.” Has there been anti-conservative attacks from the left? Sure, but that is all after Limbaugh began and certainly nowhere near the level of direct villainization. And certainly not the reach. Just check out the number of listeners for conservative radio shows or number of hits on conservative websites.
So, Trigger, the damage is already permanent. I’m 48 years old and, except for the 1984 election when Reagan won in the greatest landslide in history, the attacks on 9/11 are the only time we have thought of each other as “fellow Americans.” Think of that. It took a catastrophic event to bring us together, and that disappeared once the U.S. invaded Iraq.
Anyone can feel free to be optimistic all they want. But when I, a farm-raised retired military officer who thinks that Castle Doctrine should be the 28th Amendment, votes as a Democrat like my WWII veteran, union coal miner father did but am still labeled an un-American POS by conservatives, then there is no reason to feel anyway else.
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 12:22 pm
TLDR version:
Rush Limbaugh is responsible for America’s divide. One guy.
Not the fact that many liberals practiced the same tactics or that their most of their ideas run counter to America’s ideals of self-reliance or founding principles.
You do realize that those conservative websites and radio shows have more hits because with the exception of Fox, every other mainstream media site leans to the left, don’t you? Those websites and shows filled a free market void. Like Fox did. Conservatives were left out in the cold.
Tom Smith
July 24, 2017 @ 12:42 pm
I’m conservative and I stopped listening to the likes of Rush years ago. He set the template for every conservative to follow, and the liberal media picked it up and ran with it. If you don’t agree with the host, you’re either an idiot or a traitor. However, I disagree with you that the Left is not as bad. Now the format is employed by both sides — My Side: Good, Your Side: Evil.
Maddow, Oberman, etc. are just liberal versions of Hannity, Levin, etc. Maybe a more subtle tone in some cases, but it’s still the same result — we’re always right and the other side is always wrong.
I’m convinced that half of these people don’t even believe the garbage they spew. It’s all about ratings and making billions of dollars by keeping the Left and Right in a constant state of outrage and fear.
Trigger
July 24, 2017 @ 12:47 pm
Rush Limbaugh and the rise of conservative talk radio definitely had affect on the polarization of the public. However despite his large audience, Rush Limbaugh was still considered very much a fringe actor in media. He was a commentator with a mostly AM-based radio show.
The difference in the Russian narrative is it is mainstream and pervasive. Rush Limbaugh was able to do so well because there was a vacuum in political thought due to apathy. Today, there’s not enough room to forward an objective thought.
Clint
July 24, 2017 @ 12:27 pm
The problem with pretty much politics and music is purity tests. If you dont agree with every single thing on a checklist, you are called an other.
It is just as bad on music and it happens here all the time. People are liked because they are or arent from Texas. Are they male or female? Do they sing about depressing songs or do they sing about picking up girls? Did they have a sexualized song a few times, write them off. Did they say they supported gay marriage, well we dont need those hippies here.
Tim McGraw is a perfect example. He has put out great songs, terrible ones and ones in between. Sometimes he goes for the money or hit song and then he will go with one of the best real Country songs of the year.
I read this site every day and I think some of the articles and diacourse here are a big problem. We should all be nicer to each other if we like Sam or Sturgill.
Trigger
July 24, 2017 @ 12:51 pm
Tim McGraw is a great example, and an artist I’ve commonly praised here recently, despite his unpopularity with traditional and independent fans. I’ve also had positive things to say about Florida Georgia Line songs, Luke Bryan songs, and others. I would say something positive about Sam Hunt, but first he has to do something positive.
And despite people thinking I’m a Sturgill Simpson cheerleader, I remain his harshest critic on record.
CountryKnight
July 24, 2017 @ 1:03 pm
Clint,
You are absolutely right about purity tests on here. Jamey Johnson got destroyed for writing one dumb song. Many times, I will see a poster dismiss a singer because he or she sang one dud. As if, the greatest
legends never did the same. Some posters won’t give any mainstream singer the time of day. Some think country music died in the early 1990s. Look out if you don’t like Simpson or Jinks. Etc.
Jim Z
July 24, 2017 @ 2:42 pm
let me know when you get back to some country music.
and know I didn’t read it.
Trigger
July 24, 2017 @ 4:14 pm
But isn’t that the rub. If the Russia story continues to dominate every news and social feed, there will be no more media left to cover country music. The only country music coverage you will see will be how it interfaces with politics, or lifestyle coverage of who just got engaged, and who just had a baby. This isn’t a hypothetical, music journalists are being laid off in droves, and music coverage is being marginalized across culture due to the focus on politics, and specifically Russia.
This story may not seem to have anything to do with music or country music, but it has everything to do with it. If music journalism cannot survive, there is no vehicle for independent artists to be discovered and find the support they need to launch sustainable careers.
This threat is existential.
Jim Z
July 25, 2017 @ 9:46 am
stick with what you know bubba
Chris
July 24, 2017 @ 3:14 pm
What we are seeing at a certain level is healthy.
Namely, that institutions believe that they are above reproach and they find out they are not.
And I’m not talking about the 2 political parties or the Russians.
I’m talking about the news media generally and about others (like ESPN) which try to moralize to people who don’t want to be preached at (when they’re trying to learn a MLB box score).
What this has done for me is to facilitate my general exit from a huge swath of the media industrial complex and free up more time on my part for reading, music, etc.
No man, woman or institution is too important to not be jettisoned by the public.
That includes the media, it includes ESPN, it includes NASCAR, it includes other sports (I attended a triple A minor league game last week which had a lot less than 1,000 fans in attendance – on a Sunday afternoon), outlets and sacred cows which have the regrettable common denominator of perceiving themselves as too big to fail.
They have all misjudged the people – silly them.
In doing so, they have marginalized themselves.
Ratings bumps and similar notions aside, these former powerhouses have outlived their useful lives.
I focus my free time on things which are important to me, which almost never includes getting bogged down in the scandal de jour that would be blasting over the airwaves at me if I were watching an alphabet network show, as opposed to, say, a deep sea fishing show or the recently concluded Tour de France.
Jimsouls
July 24, 2017 @ 3:19 pm
This Russia story is very real. The D.C. corps of journalists are exhausted chasing and following up on its many leads. Be patient snd th truth will come out. It always does.
Meanwhile. white supremacist Steve Bannon continues to play a major role (perhaps THE major role) in this presidency. Why is this…or is the reason obvious
Mike Honcho
July 24, 2017 @ 4:22 pm
Oh, geez. LMAO.
Jimsouls
July 24, 2017 @ 6:30 pm
Mike Honcho, are you one of those people unified by Bannon?
Mike Honcho
July 24, 2017 @ 7:23 pm
Nope. I don’t look to politicians for answers. Why look to those that create the problem in the first place to fix it? There is nothing that doesn’t work better with less government.
GrantH
July 24, 2017 @ 3:22 pm
I don’t think the Left will ever give up the Russia story, no matter how many people are found no guilty of collusion. The Left simply refuses to admit that they nominated a garbage candidate who embodies everything that is evil about career Washington D.C. politics and had to literally cheat in the primaries just to barely beat a washed-up communist.
GrantH
July 24, 2017 @ 3:23 pm
*not guilty. Lots of typos today, my bad.
Bo Fiddley
July 24, 2017 @ 4:10 pm
“The Left simply refuses to admit that they nominated a garbage candidate… ”
So does the Right. Clinton vs Trump is about as embarrassing as the CMAs.
DJ
July 24, 2017 @ 4:13 pm
The media (alphabet networks) refuses to acknowledge their are options.
GrantH
July 24, 2017 @ 4:15 pm
The Republicans aren’t the party making up bullshit excuses for why their candidate lost the election, last I checked…
Nate
July 24, 2017 @ 6:54 pm
Nope, just bullshit excuses for why they won it.
“In addition to winning the Electoral College in a landslide, I won the popular vote if you deduct the millions of people who voted illegally”
OK Mr President, whatever you say.
GrantH
July 24, 2017 @ 7:01 pm
So illegal voter fraud isn’t an issue then, in your opinion? I live in California and I can tell you first hand that it’s a problem. The reason why lefties love those precious illegal aliens so much is because they’re such a reliable voting base. I’m much more concerned about non-citizens being able to vote than Russia “hacking” my vote for Trump. And nobody on the right is making excuses. We’re having a fun time right now, to be honest. Stay salty.
Nate
July 24, 2017 @ 7:57 pm
Nah man, I’m saying both parties are equally stupid. I’m not salty, I actually agree that the Democrats keep making up bullshit excuses. I just happen to think the Republicans make up bullshit too.
Bo Fiddley
July 24, 2017 @ 7:45 pm
That has nothing to do with the fact that they nominated an ass clown for president. Same goes for the left. Our political system is like our justice system. Prosecutors don’t care if they convict the innocent and defense attorneys don’t care if they acquit the guilty, they just want to win.
Toby in AK
July 25, 2017 @ 5:12 pm
As bad as Clinton is as a candidate, she won the popular vote and would have won the electoral with even a small tweak in strategy.
I could not vote for Clinton… but Trump was so bad he got less votes than Romney despite facing Clinton instead of Obama.
DJ
July 24, 2017 @ 4:10 pm
Watch the right hand, pay no attention to the left hand.
To the OT, concerning video vs written. I do written 99% of the time. My music video’s are you tube only when I want to listen to selected music. If I want to watch a movie there are many movies available with credible actors not celebrity wanna be’s, be they alleged journalist or politicians with their sound bites. Neither opinion will change the course we’re on nor will the Russians or any other nation. I am so glad I’m as old as I am. If I were younger I’d likely wind up in jail. The idiots in DC and the complicit media are too self centered to be trusted to be dog catchers, never mind law makers or news casters, and it’s mostly the fault of people my age who were taught to trust the fucking gov’t. Fucking being the key and their vaseline and/or KY jelly is brittle and old and talking heads on radio and TV are useless as tits on boar hogs, except for entertainment value because the music played on “country radio” isn’t entertaining.
Scott
July 24, 2017 @ 5:04 pm
Straight, Christian white people have the luxury of pretending these things aren’t going on and seeking out normalcy because their entire existence is not being threatened on a daily basis. You think that people don’t want to return to their normal lives? How is a person of color supposed to go on about their normal business when we have white supremacists like Steve Bannon and Jeff Sessions working to actively dehumanize them? Transgender people whose civil rights are being taken away? Muslim Americans? The LGBT community? Mexican-Americans? I think you are trying to negate the seriousness of what is happening in our country right now because it causes you discomfort. Seriously – just do a quick google search for “trump and white supremacy” and read a few of the articles that come up. Start with this one: http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2017/03/14/how_is_steve_bannon_getting_away_with_this.html
This is the biggest crisis our country has faced in most of our lifetimes. Every facet of our democracy is being threatened. Freedom of speech, freedom of religion, civil rights, voting rights, everything is up in the air. Sorry if Vice can’t write about EDM right now.
ShadeGrown
July 24, 2017 @ 5:39 pm
Fuckin’ straight Christian white people!!!
HayesCarll23
July 24, 2017 @ 7:22 pm
This seriously made no sense and displays the critical thinking skills of a 3rd grader at best.
CountryKnight
July 25, 2017 @ 5:52 am
Slate. LOL
And I love how you lump all straight, Christian, white people together. How tolerant.
And for the record, I prefer Anglo-American.
Jack Williams
July 25, 2017 @ 6:17 am
Speak for yourself. We’re not all Anglos, chief.
CountryKnight
July 25, 2017 @ 6:46 am
That is why I said, “I” and not “we.”
Reading comprehension. Try it out, chief.
Jack Williams
July 25, 2017 @ 8:59 am
Nice try. You said you prefer Anglo-American to “white people.” Anglos make up maybe 10 to 15 percent of those who are considered white. You seem to be lumping all white people together. How’s that for irony?
CountryKnight
July 25, 2017 @ 9:28 am
Good grief, how thick are you? I was pretty clear in saying that I prefer being labeled Anglo-American. Not all white people. They can chose any label they want. Italian-American, Polish-American, white, etc.
Here it is again: perfectly clear for you to understand. I, Country Knight, identify as Anglo-American. I am not claiming that designation for any other white people.
scott
July 25, 2017 @ 5:54 am
If you’re getting your news, and views, from Slate…well, good luck with that.
WRS
July 24, 2017 @ 5:49 pm
Now gently remove the tin foil hat from your head.
WRS
July 24, 2017 @ 5:50 pm
for Scott
Justin C
July 24, 2017 @ 8:10 pm
On a side note, this whole Donald Trump thing is similar to Nashville. We need some true country music people to go to Nashville and drain the swamp cause there are still blue collar working class Americans that miss true Country music, instead of this globalized pop bullshit. And that voice isn’t being heard or respected even though they do listen to Chris Stapleton, sturgill Simpson, etc.
Bill
July 24, 2017 @ 8:55 pm
I was so happy I found SCM a little over a year ago because I love the music and wanted an escape from all the political crap going on, even though I do care and definitely have views on issues. I do agree with the central theme that everything is so overhyped and polarized with 24/7 coverage competing news outlets.
Ulysses McCaskill
July 24, 2017 @ 10:00 pm
I’m beyond tired of hearing about a new scandal every day, no matter which party or candidate is in office. It’s frankly a joke that we elected a man like Trump. On the flip side, what the left offers up is literally no better. Say Hillary didn’t cheat to win the primary, do we really think Bernie Sanders would have been a good president??? The guy’s literally a communist. People should be fed up with both far-left and far-right politics alike by now.
Trainwreck92
July 25, 2017 @ 10:23 am
If you think Sanders is a commie, you don’t know much about communism. Actually commies wouldn’t vote for Sanders because to them, there’s no difference between Bernie and Hillary.
Ulysses McCaskill
July 25, 2017 @ 11:32 am
Regardless, he’s still far left.
RD
July 25, 2017 @ 11:42 am
The saying goes that the revolution devours its own children. More accurately, it devours its parents. Bernie is a commie from a different time. The revolution has moved on down the road.
DJ
July 25, 2017 @ 6:29 am
It’s all BS. The war mongers, on both sides of the aisle, need a boogey man. The threats we’re told about are almost non-existent and our biggest threat is from within by politico’s buying votes and selling fear to retain their ill gotten powers which destroy our civil liberties. This Russian crap is such a non issue except that the talking heads need to feel relevant again. As the article eluded to, they are being left behind and they can’t stand the thought they aren’t the gods they believe themselves to be, just like the politico’s they vilify or defend.
Chris
July 25, 2017 @ 8:43 am
Trig –
You did a great job covering this matter without making it partisan (by overwhelming it with your own political beliefs).
That’s not easy to do.
It’s good to be able to discuss important topics without the usual ad hominem vitriol resulting from the fact that we didn’t all vote for the same candidate(s).
Benny Lee
July 25, 2017 @ 9:05 am
The Free Press is one of the cornerstones of every democracy on earth.
Nixon would not have been forced out if not for investigative journalism.
I bet if you look back, you’ll find that it took investigate journalism to uncover most, if not all, of our nation’s biggest political crimes.
The Free Press doing its job has had zero effect on my love and enjoyment of music.
Trigger
July 25, 2017 @ 12:51 pm
I a not against investigative journalism. I have practiced investigative journalism myself on this very site, and for other outlets. I am a firm believer in investigative journalism. I am also against the press gaming the public, and pitting segments of people against each other to generate clicks in an attempt to prop up a dying industry.
Chris
July 25, 2017 @ 2:55 pm
You say it very well in referring to gaming the public and trying to further divide our country.
The press prospers, from a viewership perspective, if there is plenty of controversy.
Controversy, and not simply news, becomes its stock and trade.
There is a difference between investigative journalism (e.g. the press’s superb role in the uncovering of the Watergate scandal) and agenda-driven journalism (CBS’s 5-year pursuit of the story that GWB played hookey while in the Texas Air National Guard).
That was fake news generated by a major US television network in an attempt to alter the outcome of a US Presidential election.
Even though CBS chased the story for 5 years and got the facts wrong, the story came completely unraveled through the work of some bloggers over the course of an evening.
CBS responded by sticking with the story and standing behind its reporters for a few days until CBS finally came to accept what the rest of the country could easily see – namely, that it had been lied to by its reporters.
This journalistic fraud led to a rather ignominious end to Dan Rather’s 45 or 50 year career as a journalist.
Consider the case of NBC, which rigged a GMC pick-up truck with incendiary devices which caused the fuel tank to rupture and catch fire.
But its video was staged and, unfortunately for NBC, the fuel tank started exploding before the vehicle was hit by the second vehicle.
This is major journalistic fraud by yet another major US network.
And then NBC had its reporters get into a canoe in New Orleans post-Katrina to give the false impression as to the depth of the flood waters, only to have someone walk by during the telecast, revealing that the canoe sat in 6 inches of water.
More journalistic fraud.
Investigative news takes the reporter where the evidence leads and the reporter objectively reports such evidence.
Agenda-driven journalism tries to find a story to fit a desired narrative.
Witness, the UVa baseless rape case falsely reported by Rolling Stone Magazine in which the reporter was not investigating facts, but instead actively looking around the country to find a story in which some rich, spoiled fraternity kids sexually assaulted a not so rich female.
The reporter, and Rolling Stone, got what they wanted – a story.
The fact that Rolling Stone Magazine is not owned by a national fraternity is beyond me.
Honest investigative journalism is fact-driven.
Agenda-driven journalism is not.
So, today I have no inherent confidence in the accuracy of most reported news.
I have no reason to.
So I have slowly eliminated a good bit of it from my daily routine.
Benny Lee
July 25, 2017 @ 6:02 pm
I agree with your last sentence, Trigger. It’s easy to see what both sides are doing politically. All you have to do is watch 5 minutes of FOX and MSNBC.
I was disagreeing with what you said about the reporting on Russia. It is absolutely the job of the media to get this out in the open even though there is an ongoing federal investigation. In fact, there would be no investigation without all the investigative reporting.
It can be hard for people to separate the real stuff from the fluff, though. I think maybe that was more your point? The real story (i.e. “The facts”) is there, but then it instantly gets turned into garbage “shock news” by al the talking heads. A discerning consumer can get past the junk, but it takes way more effort than it should.
Kind of like finding good country music these days. It should just be there on the radio, but instead we’re fed junk, and discerning consumers must dig for the good stuff.
Toby in AK
July 25, 2017 @ 1:58 pm
I think there’s no way you can win with an article like this, because you’ve bit off such a monumental subject that you can’t give it justice in a short column. You are touching on something important though. So that I don’t end up in the same bind, I’m going to try limiting my response to a couple brief points.
– on Russian interference: if the Russian KGB (or whatever it’s called now) is truly out to create a hall of mirrors to sow distrust and distort reality, then I believe the media is either a willing accomplice or a bunch of useful idiots. The current model of reporting on every controversy ASAP with sloppily researched rumors and all the economic incentives for doing so has really been a boon to anyone (Russian or otherwise) who wishes to conflate truth with fiction.
– on print media: You said it in a nutshell “NY Times and Washington Post”. The economic realities of the newspaper industry has created a situation where those two outlets have a near monopoly on coverage. It used to be that every city had a newspaper with subscribers, and the flow of stories went in both directions. WAPO would occasionally print some big stories aggregated from Kansas City, St. Louis, Salt Lake City, or even some small paper in the middle of bumfuck nowhere. Today, when I visit my local papers website, I’d estimate 75% of their content is reprinted from WAPO. There is no longer a market to sustain newspapers in small markets, giving coverage to local stories. The big papers (WAPO, NYT, WSJ, maybe LA Times) overwhelmingly hire journalists that either currently live or originate in those cities. I think that adds to the partisan response because print media no longer represents a cross-section of America, therefore they are less in touch with it. That is a reflection of an old business model that has died off, and a new decentralized market has not yet filled the space. There are many more articles that touch on this, here is one with a more quantitative look at the phenomenon:
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/04/25/media-bubble-real-journalism-jobs-east-coast-215048
– The media (or at least a few very centralized outfits) is benefiting greatly from all of this financially speaking. Subscriptions are up at NYT and WAPO, ratings at CNN must be breaking records. But the profession of journalism is hurting, badly. If you are a journalists reading this, here’s a little piece of advice however unhelpful: if you want people to trust you make up a good lie – tell them you are a lawyer or something. If a journalist tried to interview me for a story there’s no way I’d trust them to accurately report on my statements or give any sort of good faith effort to passing along my voice. I’d fear instead that they’d chop and screw in any way needed to create a “Toby in AK” remix that either ridiculed me, distorted my viewpoints to match their narrative, or even create me into some sort of villain for the social media lynch mob to set upon. I don’t think I’m in the minority feeling that way.
– The mixing of news, opinion and entertainment hasn’t helped. John Oliver, Tucker Carlson, John Stewart, Steven Colbert, Bill O’Reilly, or whomever… they serve up red meat for us masses by picking the low hanging fruit among us and holding it up for ridicule.
Chad
July 25, 2017 @ 7:49 pm
I’m late to this party, but wow, Trigger. This is some kind of mental contortionism you’re performing to connect two disparate dots.
There are so many off-the-wall takes in this one.
This is an *opinion* piece (it’s your site, you can do that, of course), which doesn’t necessarily require much in the way of evidence. If you want to argue that this is a “news” article, what are your specific examples of “Print media is also laying off art critics and lifestyle reporters for more political reporters, pundits and commentators”? ESPN and Fox Sports’ problems have zero to do politics and everything to do with the shifting nature of viewership/readership/advertising on cable and online.
New media companies have been going under/morphing completely since the advent of “new media.” The last six months are no different from the last six or 16 years.
You often revisit this refrain of “why can’t we keep politics out of music (or sports or everything or whatever)?” That’s impossible; politics are in *every* single corner of *everyone’s* life, deciding how we get health care and who we marry and how our kids get educated and whether my street gets paved and what type of porn we can look at. To pretend otherwise adds to the disfunction.
Jojoba
July 26, 2017 @ 9:26 am
Imma just come in at at the end of this thing because I just read it. But I think this is one of the best articles I’ve read about what is currently happening. I also know I’ll be shouting into the wind a bit here but I’m not really even sure where I can go to talk about this. As someone who would probably be considered liberal and progressive by the rest of the country, my friends have gone so far left that they are almost socialist. And I feel as a long time supporter, the left is losing its dang mind. I feel the right has lost its dang mind as well. I think those strongly on the left and those strongly on the right actauly have more in common then people in the center. They have been given this great gift, the gift of being able to blame others for what is happening there lives. For 8yrs the right blamed Obama for everything (#thanksalotObama) but now they have a Repub POTUS and control the house so what do they do? They still blame liberals??? HUH? Meanwhile after 8yrs of their dream POTUS the left woke up on Nov 9th to find out the world is vastly different then what they thought. What to do? Blame the Repubs.
Now I’m not saying Trump is my dream POTUS (he’s a disaster) but if people in this country do not start taking personal responsibility for their actions we are doomed. I am truly worried that the progressive areas that have driven the new economy in aspects of technology will begin to disenfranchise themselves and become enamored with falling too in love with their own victimization. Sadly I don’t see any end to it. Americans on both songs have become so addicted to anger that I am at a loose as to see a way through.
Fuzzy TwoShirts
July 28, 2017 @ 10:05 am
(as Steve Martin) “It’s spelled jojoba… but pronounced oh-oh-ba…”
Anne
July 26, 2017 @ 6:12 pm
America is a republic, not a democracy.