Eric Church Says Country’s Becoming Homogenized, & He Can’t Tell New Artists Apart
Eric Church has always said the right things. Or, he’s said the right things most of the time at least. The question with Church has always been where the marketing ends, and where the real Eric Church begins. Really, where Eric Church is at his best is when he doesn’t say anything, and lets his music and his actions speak for him. That’s what he did with his latest record, Mr. Misunderstood, which was critically-acclaimed, award winning, and a commercial smash, despite the lack of a roll out and very little media push afterwards. He let the organic inertia of his noble deeds carry it to the top as opposed to peddling it through conventional channels.
Undoubtedly, Eric Church has built one of the most rabid and loyal fans bases in music by doing it his way, the hard way, and as an antithesis to the way Music Row regularly handles its business. He’s done it through hard touring and taking care of his fans. He’s done it by ruffling feathers, like when he got kicked off the Rascal Flatts tour at the beginning of his career for playing too long and too loud. But he’s also no Cody Jinks or Sturgill Simpson, and sometimes seems a little quick to want to take credit for all of his renegade behavior, when in truth he has been helped by country radio, awards shows, and other Music Row institutions, even if it’s not to the same level as some of his contemporaries.
In a recent feature in The Nashville Scene ahead of two sold out shows at Music City’s Bridgestone Arena, Eric Church explained his philosophical approach to music.
“Artists who have had success and are further on in their career, a lot of them get caught up in making good money,” he tells The Scene‘s Marissa R. Moss. “They keep doing their thing and not rocking the boat. But I’ve never had success that way. I’ve had success rocking the boat. And I see artists who try things and it doesn’t work — they probably made the right decision, but it just didn’t work — so they retreat, and start listening to other people and start trying to go back to the middle. It won’t work that way.”
“The more success I’ve had, the more I try to push the boundaries,” Church continues. “Not saying, ‘Well, “Springsteen” worked, so let’s do that again, let’s make a record of five radio singles with these four hit songwriters!’ I’ve not done that, and music would be better if more successful artists said, ‘Screw this, I have the clout, I can get stuff played, I can make the record I want and get it sold, so let’s go farther towards the Americana world or pushing the agenda.’ What happens is [country] becomes so homogenized, I can’t tell one new guy from another new guy or one new girl from another new girl.”
In the far ranging article, Eric Church also criticizes how music has strayed away from the traditional album. “We make a mistake, at least in Nashville, that it’s all about the EP, those three or four-song digital booklets,” Eric says. But is this really true of Nashville, and especially mainstream country music? Except for emerging acts, most, if not all Music Row artists still adhere to the album cycle. Miranda Lambert just released a double album, and one that many are couching as Americana-influenced. It’s independent artists who seem to have fallen in love with EP lately.
The article also has glowing words for Church from Ray Wylie Hubbard, who received a name drop on Mr. Misunderstood and recently played with Church at a show in Dallas. Rhiannon Giddens, who sings on Church’s “Kill A Word” (and also shares the same manager), has similar praise for Eric’s renegade attitude, as do other artists and industry professionals who praise Church’s independence. Church also talks about his fight against scalpers.
“It’s taking the power away from the entitled,” says Church. “It’s all about exclusivity, everywhere in this country. We’re trying to take that away, and make it about the people. Everyone is equal. You shouldn’t have to pay more for a ticket. You shouldn’t have to get the record last because of the critics or radio.”
And it’s hard to argue with any of the assertions Church makes. He has gone to bat for his fans against scalpers. He did find much of his success without the 100% support of radio, though he’s also found enough radio success to say it aided his ascent, and enough to where he can’t claim he did it all on his own. Eric Church is one of the good guys of the mainstream, or more like one of the bad guys who is willing to do good things inside a bad system.
But sometimes I just wish he would do these good deeds, and make the music he wants, and let the word trickle out organically as opposed to putting out press releases and patting himself on the back about every little thing and about how different he is. This is when I become suspicious that it’s all just part of a grand marketing scheme to re-integrate the disenfranchised country music fan back into the system so they don’t get too far afield and start buying all of their records from Bloodshot and Thirty Tigers.
Eric Church can be his own worst spokesman at times. But it’s not just about what Eric Church says, it’s also about what he does. He puts his money where his mouth is, and has been rewarded by his fans for it. But he’s still part of the Music Row system, even if he refuses to be a party to some of its most malevolent behavior, or know how to follow its rules. He’s more the Music Row enigma than he is the Music Row enemy.
May 30, 2017 @ 11:37 am
“What happens is [country] becomes so homogenized, I can’t tell one new guy from another new guy or one new girl from another new girl.” – Eric Church
Dammit Eric! I always like your music
June 1, 2017 @ 9:34 am
Lester Flatt had your number, Eric
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXEWgbENYu4
LOL
May 30, 2017 @ 11:49 am
I agree. My cousin and I discussed this on our first podcast a few months ago. He does so much right but kind of soils it by patting himself on the back.
May 30, 2017 @ 9:26 pm
Hank Jr made a living since about 1985 by patting himself on the back and singing about how great Bocephus is.
June 2, 2017 @ 9:59 am
that’s because Bocephus really is that great it aint bragging if you got the goods to back it up!!
May 30, 2017 @ 11:57 am
he’s not merle haggard or johnny cash. he’s not even john denver. but in 2017, he’s more or less one of the best we’ve got.
May 30, 2017 @ 12:10 pm
Well, that’s a long way from what he was saying about what was going on in mainstream country being “as good and cool as any format” or however he put it. I’d like to know what caused his change of tune, so to speak.
Totally will him on the scalpers, though. Those people need to have their naughty bits gnawed off by rabid squirrels.
May 30, 2017 @ 9:32 pm
Where did he say that?
As far back as that Rolling Stone interview in 2014, he was saying that modern country radio was “very feel-good. It’s a little bit shallower than it was a few years ago — it’s ‘Let’s drink, forget our worries, beach, bonfire, lake.’ When something’s working, everybody falls into a pattern. One thing I miss is turning on the radio and just having a song punch me in the gut, and, as a songwriter, knock me on my ass. And I think we could use more of that.”
May 30, 2017 @ 12:14 pm
Good read, Trigger. I think the take-away wrt Church is that it takes insiders to foster change. You have mentioned in the past (I paraphrase) how Chris Stapleton, despite his incredible talent, has succeeded writing mainstream songs that we hate but that it paved the way for him to emerge with his own sound. If country is to move away from its torrid recent past, it will take people like Church to make that happen. He needs support from those like us.
May 30, 2017 @ 12:20 pm
It seems like so many of the people really have no set belief system they just sort blow with the wind. Hence one day they praise the new guys for doing their own thing or whatever and then a month later they are bemoaning how every song is about the same thing.
It makes it hard for me to take any of these guys seriously and that goes for the supposed ‘good guys’ like Simpson and Stapleton also. Don’t rock the boat, go along to get along, know your audience, whatever you want to call it but it really hurts the authenticity of these guys when they seem so unmoored.
May 30, 2017 @ 5:59 pm
Maybe I missed something, but I’m not sure where Stapleton comes in here, especially with that whole “I don’t think country music needs saving” bit and that stupid sushi analogy he likes to peddle.
May 30, 2017 @ 9:29 pm
Stapleton doesn’t “try to peddle” anything.
He makes the music that he likes, and he doesn’t really care what other people do.
That’s far more “authentic” to who Chris Stapleton is than pretending to be some Outlaw Country Music Jesus would be.
May 31, 2017 @ 5:09 am
That’s far more “authentic” to who Chris Stapleton is than pretending to be some Outlaw Country Music Jesus would be.
But I never implied it wasn’t, or at least I didn’t mean to.
For the record, I am not a fan of Church OR Stapleton, though in the case of the latter it has more to do with the music itself than the image.
May 31, 2017 @ 6:47 am
Was more referring to how Stapleton has written for Thomas Rhett and the like.
I guess what I’m saying is that none of these mainstream guys can seem to be consistent in their words and actions because they rely on the major label system, which is fine by the way if that’s what they want, and that means that they will always have contradictions all over the place.
It just may be too much to ask for them to be consistent in the world they occupy so I tend to just ‘whatever’ to these types of comments because in a few months will see another article with Church or another guy talking about the ‘new guys’ doing their thing or an awards show performance with one of them.
May 31, 2017 @ 7:17 am
I don’t think that Stapleton has any contradictions, though, because he never pretends to be some sort of purist.
He’s written well-crafted pop songs that he’s recorded while fronting a Grammy-nominated bluegrass band.
He writes well-crafted pop songs that he records as country-influenced blues music.
And he writes well-crafted pop songs that guys like Thomas Rhett record as weird metro-bro shit.
It’s all part of the same package.
May 30, 2017 @ 12:53 pm
I saw Church play in Peoria a few weeks ago. He and his band did a nice job. He definitely worked hard to connect with the audience without a ton of spectacle. And the show was about 3 hours long with just him and his band. I think he does genuinely care about music and about his fans, and he has talent.
I saw Jason Isbell a week before that (smaller venue, obviously), and the Isbell show was absolutely amazing. Church’s show was no comparison. But I bet Eric Church would put on a heck of a show in a small venue with 1500 people on their feet singing along like they were for Isbell
May 30, 2017 @ 1:54 pm
Was that Isbell show the one at The Limelight? Kicking myself for not getting tickets. Is that a decent venue compared to, say Boondocks in Springfield?
May 30, 2017 @ 2:39 pm
Yep. I haven’t been to Boondocks yet, so I can’t compare. The sound at Limelight is great, the view of the stage is good as long as you’re tall enough. The venue is a big warehouse, which is kinda cool, but not as interesting as, say, Castle Theatre in Bloomington.
May 31, 2017 @ 6:17 pm
I was at that Isbell show, too. My gf didn’t like the Limelight for some reason (it’s a shed in the middle of nowhere) but I think the sound was really good. I’ve also seen him at the Castle. Once the music starts, I don’t think there’s a big difference.
June 1, 2017 @ 8:49 am
I’ve also seen Isbell at Castle a couple years ago, and I’ve been to one other show at each venue. I think the sound is better at Limelight, but that could have been influenced by where we were standing. I like the railings and aisles at Castle. Even for a crowded show, you can have some organization. The Isbell show at Limelight required a fair amount of pushing your way through anytime you went to the bathroom or the bar. The sloped/stepped floor at Castle also makes it easier to see no matter where you are in the theater.
May 30, 2017 @ 1:04 pm
I know Eric does seldom press stuff. But I think this interview was conducted and released at this time is because first-round CMA nomination ballots are due in a few weeks. With a solo tour and “Mr. Misunderstood” still producing hits, his team has to know that this is best shot at Entertainer of the Year. It’s a local Nashville magazine, it’ll be freshly in voters mind when it’s time to vote. He’s not hitting all the morning shows or appearing on all the award shows, etc. like other big-name acts who are typical contenders at Entertainer. His team has a streamlined approach at marketing and it works for them, even if the occasional feathers are ruffled.
May 30, 2017 @ 1:18 pm
This! But Eric Church doesn’t care about industry award and accolatons! Or does he? I guess that marketing degree from Appalachian State is paying dividends…
May 30, 2017 @ 3:44 pm
You know he’s gotta want the Entertainer accolade just so he can really prove to the industry that he did it his way. With as hard as he works for it, he would deserve it. He can say he got there bc of the songs and the fans. Not bc of the smoke and the lights and big-time stage productions that most of the other top performers have.
May 30, 2017 @ 8:17 pm
Eric doesn’t care about it, but he also wouldn’t complain; it would be a big career, and moral booster for him, his Management, his team, and fans. I think the situation is similar to Hank Jr in the 80s.
May 30, 2017 @ 1:12 pm
He has always said these things…this isn’t new. He believes in crossing genre boundaries and it’s true, pushing the envelope is his thing…it HAS worked for him. I’m a fan – I don’t think he changes his tune…he’s honest…he still believes in country music, he still thinks it’s a great format, but he does believe it needs some change and to step outside the industry boundaries…I don’t know why that’s not okay to voice. I don’t see his comments as hypocritical or dishonest. I also don’t view this as him “patting himself on the back” – these are the things that the media wants him to talk about, so naturally it is going to be the topic of conversation. Has he helped shape the conversation around him? Obviously. But also, like is pointed out above, he puts his money where his mouth is. Marketing is part of the music biz…it HAS to be…marketing is part of any business, regardless! I sometimes feel he is needlessly criticized for this when others are just as guilty of exactly the same thing (YES, even the guys not as much in the spotlight). And yes I’m an Eric Church devotee, but for good reason. I think he’s the best thing in mainstream country today (along with Stapleton)…and thank goodness he’s around because there isn’t a whole lot left worth anything. Anyways, I always feel obligated to jump into these conversations haha I understand some disagree, but there’s my two cents.
May 30, 2017 @ 1:29 pm
My Eric Church fandom has been all over the place. The first song I ever heard from him, Smoke A Little Smoke, I thought was different and kinda cool, the he hit it big with Springsteen a song I didn’t care for. I kinda ignored him for awhile, but have come around to liking him again. Maybe not Jinks, but if you pick through his albums you can find some good stuff.
May 30, 2017 @ 1:35 pm
Lol Church is definitely better than Jinks
May 30, 2017 @ 1:51 pm
That’s funny. The first time I heard Cody Jinks, I thought “so this is what Eric Church tries to sound like”. I’ll stick with Jinks. Better voice and better songs.
May 30, 2017 @ 1:57 pm
Eric Church wants to be Guitar Town/Exit 0/Copperhead Road-era Steve Earle.
I’m pretty sure “I Ain’t Ever Satisfied” is his stylistic True North.
May 30, 2017 @ 3:05 pm
I’d rather he aim for “Johnny Come Lately,” but maybe that’s just me.
May 30, 2017 @ 3:59 pm
Steve Earle is a fine role model for him to follow!
May 30, 2017 @ 9:33 pm
Eh, they’re both great songs.
May 30, 2017 @ 3:57 pm
Lol! Jinks is a wanna be waylon jennings. Decent songs and I like him but Church is a creative genius and Jinks could never pull off the tour Church just had.
May 30, 2017 @ 4:48 pm
I agree, he is a creative genius. His act is superb.
May 30, 2017 @ 4:53 pm
Trigger, can we add a “-1” feature?
May 30, 2017 @ 5:04 pm
He probably would since he already sensors me. King Strait likes him so thats all that matters, O said I like Jinks but he will never be on Churchs level or have his talent, seen Church in Feb and Jinks a couple weeks ago and its not close. Church is superior
May 30, 2017 @ 6:52 pm
Why are we comparing the two? Apples and Oranges. If you like big shiny things, a fake badass persona in leather, large stadium shows, etc, of course church wins every time.
June 1, 2017 @ 10:47 am
I agree, Eric Church is out making orginal music and trying to make new sounds that are still country and Cody Jinks failed at metal and is now trying to be some sorta new Waylon Jennings
June 1, 2017 @ 11:48 am
Jerry – you have shown repeatedly that you have no ability to critique music. Just give it a rest.
June 1, 2017 @ 5:58 pm
Please explain how my statement is false?
June 1, 2017 @ 9:11 pm
Eric church is formalaic pop country rock. The last thing he is doing is making any “new sounds”. Jinks played metal in his teens and maybe early 20s, before focusing on country. Who cares that he made the switch full time to country. And if you think he sounds like Waylon, you obviously have no idea what you are talking about (shocking!!). So yes, jerry, totally false.
June 2, 2017 @ 11:45 am
I’m going to have to agree with Jtrpdx, Jinks and Waylon(I take it you mean Jennings?) don’t sound much alike at all. Jerry keeps saying this and I can’t for the life of me figure out why. My only guess is the Waylon he keeps mentioning is a completely different Waylon than the one I’m thinking of.
June 2, 2017 @ 12:52 pm
…have you every listened to Creepin, or Knives of New Orleans?
YMMV on how well it works, but Eric Church does a ton of interesting stuff, sonically.
June 5, 2017 @ 2:19 pm
Jim bob open your geriatric ears and you might hear the resemblance. Jtrpdx, youre critiquing is horrible. You have a biased opinion of Church which is making you wrongly critique his music. I dont want this comment sensored since Trigger is apparently a freaking Nazi so I wont talk about how you should go buttfuck your grandma and suck off Jim bob
May 30, 2017 @ 2:33 pm
Sorry but as far as I am concerned he is an egotistical punk. While on a festival tour a few years back we were back stage & witnessed his fit cause he wasn’t on the main stage in the lineup & he was not that big a deal then. He ranted if it was not changed he was leaving the tour. The promoter told us an artist had never quit on him before & was not letting it happen this time. So he got his way & the others in the lineup were not thrilled on the changes or his rant. A lot of respect was lost that day. And his fan club parties are determined by who gets chosen to attend. Fans have given up after 5-6 attempts. First impressions sit w me & this will never be shaken.
May 30, 2017 @ 3:39 pm
I believe that Eric treats his fans better than any act I’ve ever seen. His fan club parties and meet and greets are through a lottery system, so that it’s fair to everyone. In my 40+ Church shows over the past 11 years, I’ve won two meet and greets, but Eric will always take the time to talk/sign records with us and other fans after the show.
May 30, 2017 @ 9:24 pm
Hank3 does a meet and greet for free with every fan at every show
May 30, 2017 @ 10:02 pm
Hank 3 doesn’t sell out huge venues by himself. Like Church’s music or not, he’s good to his fans
May 31, 2017 @ 11:31 am
Hank 3 could have had he made pop country music and had shallow terrible music like Church
June 1, 2017 @ 6:48 am
Assjack is pretty shallow stuff.
May 30, 2017 @ 4:23 pm
Yeah I think this “choosen” fans thing comes down to one specific issue that some Church fans get all bent about. Hey sometimes it’s about who you know…anyways with 100,000 fans in the club you’re bound to have a tough time making the cut. I whole heartedly agree with AT’s comment…
May 30, 2017 @ 4:59 pm
I love Eric Church. He and Sturgill are the ones who will shake things up, and Eric has a much broader audience (for now).
May 30, 2017 @ 9:38 pm
It is odd to see those two in the same breath, as they are so different in my view. Maybe I just need to give Church another try. Seriously though, I can’t get past the stupid press photos with him in his leather jacket and aviators, and the whole bad boy marketing thing. I know that shouldn’t matter when it comes to the music, but man, it sure is lame and taints my ability to respect the music.
May 30, 2017 @ 9:48 pm
But aren’t all press photos somewhat ridiculous? I mean really….they all kind of make me laugh lol and I do mean that….for any artist! All trying to portray some sort of “image” or message…most of them silly…if I were an artist I would probably hate doing those (and music videos). In the end, all about perspective I suppose.
May 31, 2017 @ 12:26 pm
If it helps, he only started wearing sunglasses because his contacts would dry up on stage. x)
May 30, 2017 @ 5:55 pm
“The question with Church has always been where the marketing ends, and where the real Eric Church begins”
bang
“suspicious”
he’ll show his true colors when he ages out
agreed: he has talent, and he’s a survivor
but does he hurt?
May 30, 2017 @ 6:35 pm
I think for those who have been following Church for awhile now, this isn’t an issue. Mostly, you get the real Church. I know there’s a lot of “marketing” associated with him, but really beyond whatever media hype there may have been, he’s been on true to what he’s tried to represent for going on 12 years now. A lot of things kind of stuck with him and the media ran with it (and yes…he perpetuated it at times), but for most of his fans, he’s stayed his own course; and that is why he’s got such a devoted fan base.
May 30, 2017 @ 6:51 pm
come on
“springsteen” is too clever by half
he’s a talented fake
until I hear real pain or joy, he’s just a craftsman reaping coin
May 30, 2017 @ 6:57 pm
Lol okay, I get it, there’s no convincing you….that’s fine.
May 30, 2017 @ 7:02 pm
love you, brother
it is what it is
find your own gold, it’s ok
May 30, 2017 @ 7:07 pm
Now that statement I can get behind
May 30, 2017 @ 9:02 pm
I guess I get why country music fans wouldn’t all necessarily like “Springsteen.” But for me, that was the first Eric Church song that I really liked. It told a good story about a whirlwind romance, and had a decent message about how music can connect us to a moment in time. The “woah woah”s can get a little tiresome, but otherwise I like the song and the lyrics. I still remember hearing that song for the first time on one of the award shows and coming away impressed.
May 30, 2017 @ 6:19 pm
So do you put Jinks and Sturgill on the same level musically?
May 30, 2017 @ 6:33 pm
That would depend on personal taste. “Personally” I think Jinks is the best ‘new’ representative of country music I’ve heard in a long, long time.
May 30, 2017 @ 7:00 pm
jinks knows basic chords, church has a higher musical IQ, but I believe in jinks
cleverness can confuse the ernotional core of the music — but musical ignorance does exactly the same thing
balance between head and heart is everything
listen to Waylon, Merle, Dolly, Willie, …
May 30, 2017 @ 9:34 pm
I like jinks, but comparing him to Sturgill is a bit of a stretch when it comes to songwriting or musicianship (guitar playing and being a band leader). Vocally, jinks is a better pure, clean vocalist in many ways, but at the end of the day, it’s all about the songs. When Jinks puts out an album that has as many ridiculously good songs as Metamodern Sounds…..and does it in the way Sturgill did (recorded and wrote a lot of it in about a week I believe), the comparison conversation will be a bit more warranted.
June 1, 2017 @ 7:44 am
Listen to the last 2 Jinks albums, and get back with us.
June 1, 2017 @ 11:47 am
I have listened to them many times. They are good standard country records, but nothing approaching Sturgill’s level of songwriting.
June 1, 2017 @ 12:06 pm
I usually agree with you around here, but on this you are wrong. LOL. We’ll just disagree, all good.
June 1, 2017 @ 12:07 pm
Most times we’re both shaking our heads at whatever honky pontificates on.
June 1, 2017 @ 9:12 pm
I hear you man!
May 30, 2017 @ 6:23 pm
Eric is a good guy…he has songs that can appeal to everybody I believe. Being a country traditionalist I can still appreciate Eric.
May 30, 2017 @ 7:03 pm
I just realized I meet your description Trig of a “disenfranchised music fan who buys records from Thirty Tigers and Bloodshot”. I don’t want to go “back into the system”, so while I have nothing against Eric, I will just let him do thing while I dig the new Colter Wall.
May 30, 2017 @ 7:50 pm
Perhaps I’ve not had sufficient emersion in the Eric Church catalogue, because I don’t recall hearing any of his songs that left me wanting to hear more. Maybe I only picked up on the ultra-commercial style tunes and there is more depth underpinning his album output (??).
May 30, 2017 @ 8:25 pm
That’s your opinion which is valid but not shared by most ??
May 30, 2017 @ 9:26 pm
I am with you kapam. I have not been at all impressed with the Church stuff I have heard. And couple that with the stupid “bad boy” thing that seems so fake it’s funny, I just have no interest in it all.
May 30, 2017 @ 9:32 pm
If you hate all things mainstream country, you might not care for Eric’s music. If you can appreciate some of what mainstream has to offer, but wish you could get a little more from the kind of music you hear regularly on the radio, you might enjoy it. I wouldn’t say you’re going to hear some sort of deep poetic prose by a long shot lol you’ll get some good stories, clever lyrics, enjoyable songs, various sounds/genre mixing, and some relatable stuff. Depends on your preference, really.
And this has got to be my last comment on this post…flying my fan flag too high. Damn you, Trigger, roping me back into the comments….
May 30, 2017 @ 10:10 pm
I don’t think you come off as too fannish at all – that’s pretty much been Trig’s verdict, too.
Eric Church likes to make rock-country music, and he’s good at it. He’s never going to be mistaken for Patterson Hood, much less Isbell or Earle, but he makes damn good music.
As for authenticity, the man’s always made exactly what he wants to make. I loathe “The Outsiders,” but there’s no doubt in my mind that he got there organically.
Any studio worth its salt would have told him to reheat Chief, and make five songs that sound like Springsteen, and another five like Drink in my Hand. If he’d done that, he’d be bigger than Bryan right now.
Instead, he blew everything up.
May 30, 2017 @ 10:15 pm
Haha oh good….then another comment is fine I guess 😉
And well said with your comments, agree 100%
May 30, 2017 @ 10:25 pm
Lol ? never be mistaken for Isbell is true, he wont make boring music that you would rather bang your grandma than hear again so thats true
May 31, 2017 @ 6:47 am
Someone’s only heard the Isbell songs they play on folk stations.
May 31, 2017 @ 4:32 am
If you have to wear sunglasses indoors, something is wrong.
His music is ok but I’m not buying his pitch personally.
May 31, 2017 @ 6:28 am
Of course, he only ever wears his sunglasses indoors, since his eyes can’t handle the lights at his shows.
May 31, 2017 @ 8:02 am
Oh yea and all his photographs due to the flash
May 31, 2017 @ 12:23 pm
Nah, that’s mostly because they’ve become part of his “brand,” and he’s a bit of a douche.
Doesn’t change the fact that he makes solid music, though.
May 31, 2017 @ 12:37 pm
I was being sarcastic
May 31, 2017 @ 12:38 pm
I know.
May 31, 2017 @ 4:52 am
I just saw both of his shows at Bridgestone (Arena, Nashville). This guy pours so much passion into a 3+ hour show, and he feeds off the energy of the fans. I haven’t seen that kind of passion since Garth Brooks in the 90’s. I think, like Garth (back then), he is making the music he wants to make, and making it for all the right reasons. As the article in the Scene points out, he totally circumvented radio, the DJ’s, and the entire Nashville Machine with this last release (Mr. Misunderstood) by sending it out to his fans first. He made it about the record as a whole, and not just a single with a bunch of filler.
May 31, 2017 @ 7:16 am
“The truth is like a hangman’s noose and it’s holding up my heart tonite”
IDK just always loved that line..
Have to say, always enjoyed Church..
To each his own, but he is not the problem with music..
I see why the guy is successful..
He is a talented writer and performer.
There is nothing wrong with that..
And it is an ugly business.. Let’s not forget..
May 31, 2017 @ 7:40 am
Who could forget that badass, outlaw song “Two Pink Lines?”
May 31, 2017 @ 10:28 am
singing about birth control tests and its possible outcomes isn’t serious enough for you. get it.
May 31, 2017 @ 11:08 am
This is a ridiculous comment…never heard anyone even try to claim this was “outlaw” anything. Ugh.
May 31, 2017 @ 7:47 am
What I love about Eric Church is that he still makes albums. You can actually hear the beginning of a song and think, That’s off Carolina or that’s off Outsiders or that’s off Chief. There is very little carry over from album to album. That’s what I hate about Blake or Luke or even Carrie for that matter. There songs aren’t horrible, but they all sound the same. It’s the same stuff over and over.
As someone who has stopped listening to radio, I also like that face that Eric plays deep cuts. I mean I saw him in Omaha in April and most of the crowd knew the words to Livin Part of Life, which is the final song on Sinners Like Me. I saw Brad Paisley a few years back and he played 20 singles and called it a night.
I do think Eric plays his own music and I think he doesn’t follow trends intentionally and I don’t think he has since he tried to with the release of Love Your Love the Most and Hell on the Heart, which is the worst video I have even seen. I think Church tried to be radio star, but it failed, he hated it and started releasing his own music and we are all better for it.
May 31, 2017 @ 7:55 am
Also, from Wikipedia:
…he headed to Nashville with his father’s financial backing.”
And:
“His father also provided the opportunity to make contacts, and more importantly, time to focus on developing his songwriting ability.”
Having a rich daddy to make it rain for junior’s dream…
OUTLAW!!
May 31, 2017 @ 9:48 am
I don’t think he claims to be an outlaw. He claims to be an outsider of the Nashville mainstream to do things his own way. The fact that he didn’t have to struggle financially doesn’t mean he didn’t pay his dues and earn the respect of his audience and fan base.
May 31, 2017 @ 11:28 am
“I don’t think he claims to be an outlaw.”
Really now?
https://savingcountrymusic.com/eric-church-caught-w-foot-in-mouth-over-outlaw-image/
May 31, 2017 @ 11:41 am
Again, he never referred to himself as an outlaw. Did I miss something?
May 31, 2017 @ 12:36 pm
The only quote from Church in that article features him explicitly saying that he’d never refer to himself as an “outlaw.”
He did sell shirts saying “Outlaw Country Ain’t Dead” five years ago, but that’s actually not the same thing as referring to himself as “an Outlaw.”
May 31, 2017 @ 10:12 am
Well if Wikipedia said so then damn! *biggest eye roll of the century*
May 31, 2017 @ 10:29 am
ever artist should come from a broken family with no support of their parents.. Right on!!
May 31, 2017 @ 11:12 am
Right?!? My parents helped support me through college so I could get an education and have a stable life….so they must be RICH and therefore I’m a spoiled brat..geez, I feel awful now, I obviously must be a complete fake and deserve none of what I’ve earned in life this far 🙁
May 31, 2017 @ 12:37 pm
Right, because no one else’s parents have ever helped them network right after graduating college!
May 31, 2017 @ 4:58 pm
Does this mean the same things for fans too. A classic country fan is true and real if he or she doesn’t get any parental support? Well if that is the case then I guess I must be in violation of that very important rule of being a country music fan. What’s the fine for this breach of rules then huh cause I very do want to keep being a fan of country music? Oh I am so apologetic to have gone through years without knowing this number one rule of being a fan.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
May 31, 2017 @ 9:31 am
Why is there a picture of George Michael at the top of this story?
May 31, 2017 @ 10:02 am
I understand that it’s hard not to dislike some things about him, but I feel like a ton of people let that cause them to not like the definitively good music he puts out. Never let hatred of an artist become hatred of a song. We’ve seen it with “Dirt”–it’s a great song, despite FGL. Hell, Rascall Flatts has great songs. And what gets me the most is that EC isn’t nearly as bad as those guys. Just like the music if you like it.
May 31, 2017 @ 12:44 pm
I fucking hate Dirt. It’s lyrically shallow (the Vincent Adultman of pop-country), and reeks of inauthenticity. It’s far phonier than Cruise, Sun Daze or Get Your Shine On, all of which at least have the small virtue of being the type of music that those idiots actually enjoy making.
Church may frequently come off as a jackass, but he only ever makes the music he wants to listen to.
Sometimes it sucks (see: half the tracks off The Outsiders), but it’s often very good stuff, and always authentically him.
June 1, 2017 @ 5:00 pm
Fuck Eric Church. Ya’ll trash Sam Hunt for not being “country” and making music that he wants to make, yet ya’ll fake clowns on here will praise a sellout, fake outlaw, arrogant asshole, untalented hack like Church who isnt country and hasnt made real country music for many years? This site is turning into a huge joke. Sturgill this, Sturgill that. Isbell this, Isbell that. Any other artist just sucks, right?
June 1, 2017 @ 5:53 pm
Seems like a pretty unfair assessment of this site, the Eric Church opinion asserted in this article, the opinion of a wide variety of artists, or the amount of coverage Sturgill Simpson receives. I’ve posted 3 Sturgill Simpson articles in the last 4 months. Isbell’s received a bit more coverage but he’s about to release an album. Jeez.
June 2, 2017 @ 12:25 am
Trigger, alot of your posts are hypocritical and i know quite a good deal of people have called you out for that, and samr goed for alot of the commenters. Many times, you hit the nail on the head with your articles and comments. But trashing Chris Janson and Sam Hunt, then turning around and praising pop music artists with barely any country sound like Eric Church is the kind of hypocritical stuff im speaking of. So Eric Church can make pop music that has almost no country sound with poppy lyrics and pop music formulas, but because hes “making the music he wants and pushes the boundries” ya’ll on here praise him for that? SAM HUNT ALSO SAID THE EXACT SAME THING as well as that he believes most music on country radio sounds the same and that he wants to “stand out”, but low and behold, ya’ll TRASH Sam Hunt when he said that and any time he releases a new single. Church and Hunt, both pop country artists that hardcore lean towards pop. Their differences are: Church is a fake outlaw…a pussy with a fake image, hes very arrogant he apparently thinks his shit dont stink, he has a terrible whiny voice and lacks any type of real talent, and most of his music does not sound country in any way. Hunt is real and down to earth he dont pretend to be anyone he isnt and admits that he knows his music isnt very country, hes a very kind hearted guy that is sweet to everyone, and he at least tries to mix some country elements in his music and many of his lyrics sound country. Hunt is more country than Church, i dont care what anyone says. Hunts acoustic performances from the Between The Pines album is more country than anything Church has ever done. Im not big on pop country but i have alot of respect for Hunt for being honest about his music and he has a great voice.
June 2, 2017 @ 9:04 am
I understand what you’re saying, but I don’t think you’re giving a fair assessment to my opinions of Eric Church over the years. I spent half a decade ripping this dude apart at the seams for the very things you’re criticizing him for here, and he probably deserved it. I was so anti Eric Church, I once called him a “fucking conformist,” and another journalist read the quote to Church to gauge his reaction.
https://savingcountrymusic.com/mens-journal-reads-saving-country-music-quotes-to-eric-church/
And while I’m posting links, read this one:
https://savingcountrymusic.com/eric-church-is-awesome-just-ask-him-a-bragging-montage/
And not to get all Carly Simon on you, but you do know that Eric Church wrote “Country Music Jesus” after reading one of my articles, right?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mCgma1bMRz0
All that said, each song, each album deserves to be assessed on its own merit, and I thought that “Mr. Misunderstood” was pretty decent. I also think there’s an element of marketing in everything Eric Church does, and I went into that in detail in this article.
I just think you’re letting your Eric Church hatred blind you from my true assessment of him and his music.
June 2, 2017 @ 8:20 am
Summer Jam is one pissed off Sam Hunt fan lol – we shall all feel his wrath!!! ESPECIALLY that damn Eric Church!!!!
June 2, 2017 @ 9:56 am
Ok, I have to say this, even though you will probably not like it…I’ve been pretty opinionated on this thread though,
so why stop now…
I think it’s funny that the same things you have criticized Church for, are some of the same things I thought about YOU
when I first started reading SCM. I noticed you claimed to want to “save” country music, but you spent a whole lot of time
tearing down artists that you supposedly had no interest in. You made a lot of audacious claims, made some pretty over-the-top
and extreme statements, and seemed to just want to get everyone to look at you. Sorry, but it’s true.
NOW, if you’ll bear with me, I will circle back around….so don’t get crazy pissed just yet. Anyways, it seemed like mostly
just a technique to get your name out there and generate website traffic. I mean, it makes sense; be dramatic and make a bunch
of noise by criticizing the top names of today…that oughta get things stirred up. And it worked. It STILL works. BUT you
say “NOPE! I have no interest in such things. I just CARE!” and I roll my eyes and call BS every time. Sound familiar?
After a year or so of sticking around here though, and avoiding the comments occassionally because sometimes they make me weep
for humanity, I have changed my opinion a bit. I still think there is a degree of “calculation” associated with you too. HOWEVER,
like I said before, there are always shades of grey. I’ve come to respect your writing skills, the fact that you take time to
investigate and report on certain issues, and that you still come out with quality reviews and interact with the users of your
website.
Why am I saying this? Because I feel like it, for one; two, because I think it is relevant to the conversation, and to maybe show that
perspective really is everything…and I’m glad I kept an open mind, because I do really enjoy this site a lot of the time.
Do what you will with that…but sometimes I just gotta get these things out…keep writing that good stuff, Trigger! And hey, you can get mad about what I just wrote, or take away the fact that you were able to change my mind about some of it….your choice…
June 2, 2017 @ 11:39 am
@SummerJam
“Hunt is more country than Church”
I just don’t understand how ANYONE could come to this conclusion.
June 2, 2017 @ 11:50 am
“I just think you’re letting your Eric Church hatred blind you from my true assessment of him and his music.”
And i think that your hatred towards mainstream country blinds you from seeing any mainstream song as country or good. You rarely if ever give a mainstream artist a good review, most are negative. I want you to explain to me how Eric Church is any different than any other pop country acts, because i see no difference, he is part of the problem.
June 2, 2017 @ 12:45 pm
I just gave a really glowing review to the new Lee Brice single.
https://savingcountrymusic.com/lee-brice-is-back-and-boy-is-worth-the-hype/
Believe it or not I go out of my way to find positive things to say about mainstream music, and to the ire of many of my independent/underground readers.
June 2, 2017 @ 12:05 pm
The difference is that Church writes his own stuff (which is both rock-country with pop sensibilities and, without a doubt, authentically him), and uses actual instruments.
Also, it’s hilarious that you’re whining about how mean he is to the mainstream, in the context of his saying that a guy who currently has a Top 40 single on the Airplay charts doesn’t suck.
Church is both mainstream as fuck and the real deal musically (even if he’s an asshole).
June 2, 2017 @ 11:53 am
A) It cracks me up that your defense of Sam Hunt’s “making the music he wants to make”…is that he had a really solid acoustic album before he started making his current metro-bro shit.
B) The biggest difference between Church and Hunt’s latest output is that Church’s songs feature instruments, making him infinitely more “country” than Hunt.
I’m sure Hunt is a much nicer person than Church, but he sells sushi and calls it steak, while Church makes hamburgers and calls them that.
June 2, 2017 @ 12:14 pm
I get what you are saying and you have a point. I guess i went a little too far saying Hunt is more country than Church, i just cant stand Church except his very old material that was country. Im real angry that every country artist that made real country music has sold out to the pop country scene or sold out to the ‘pop music on country radio’ fad. Church is a great example, as well as Chris Young and Dierks Bentley.
June 2, 2017 @ 12:25 pm
Summer Jam you are an interesting one lol…I think Church’s older stuff was a bit more “pop-country on the radio” than his newer stuff (well some of it, for sure not all)….not sure what to think about you!
June 2, 2017 @ 12:59 pm
I honestly don’t think that he’s “sold out to the pop country scene,” because there’s no way handlers would have let him follow up Chief with The Outsiders.
I think he’s a guy who genuinely likes making guitar-driven country-rock with pop sensibilities (as evidenced by the fact that he views Love Your Love the Most as a “sellout moment,” because it was trad-country rather than what he likes to play).
It’s totally fine to not enjoy his style, and to think he’s a dick, but I do genuinely think he’s makes the music that he likes, rather than chasing cash like Hunt or Shelton (both of whom know better).
May 31, 2017 @ 10:17 am
Eric Church has no concept of who he actually is. He fancies himself some singing to live kind of tragic bard ala Hank Jr’s dark days but he’s actually just a suburban kid grown into a pleasantly suburban adult who writes some decent country/americana tunes a la John Mellencamp. And he has the good fortune to be writing those songs in the midst of the worst writing in the history of Nashville, so they sound pretty darn good in comparison. But it’s a thin facade, and that’s why it’s best for him to just keep his opining to a minimum and let the music do the talking. And please, for the love of Christ, lose the dopey sunglasses.
May 31, 2017 @ 12:18 pm
I think the guy is so successful because he knows exactly who he is and wants to be.
May 31, 2017 @ 12:48 pm
If I had never actually read a single one of his interviews, and only looked at his publicity photos, I’d think the same thing!
May 31, 2017 @ 6:58 pm
Lol I didn’t realize we had Eric Church’s therapist here on SCM with us…I mean, to know exactly what he thinks of himself…and to be aware of this personal identity crisis he lives with….just wow….
Hahahahaha….do me now! What can you tell me about myself? Should I get a headshot, or press release style photo of myself to help you with the assessment?
May 31, 2017 @ 1:49 pm
Also, I think Sturgill’s dad helped him out on his first album or offered to. I’m not sure what money has to do with being an outlaw, not that he calls himself that anyway.
May 31, 2017 @ 8:39 pm
I had LASIK surgery a few months ago…I still wear sunglasses when it rains. What does it matter when someone wears sunglasses? It may be image, or not.Who knows?!
May 31, 2017 @ 9:58 pm
Donald Trump says he’s an outsider while he hire’s people who invented super pacs. Eric Church is the same animal. He calls himself an outsider while his puppet master Arthur Buenahora, Eric’s wife Catherine Gooch, all of Eric’s co-writers, and current and former management are all Music Row insiders. Church is a product of the machine. That’s why he has to constantly tell everyone what an outsider he is. He’s a fucking suburban boy from money. I’m sorry for those of you that don’t understand that a Waylon or Haggard aren’t made from privilege. They’re self made men. Eric Church is the biggest poser I’ve ever seen and I’ve been around him since he started out trying to make it on Music Row years ago. His leather jacket and sunglasses are an image and everything is calculated. That’s okay for shallow commercial country but let’s not pretend what it really is.
June 1, 2017 @ 6:39 am
Yeah! Church has nearly as much family money as that Townes Van Zandt fellow! Everyone knows what a phony he was!
Also…is anyone calling him a Waylon or a Haggard?
He’s certainly never referred to himself as such.
He’s pretty clearly trying to be Eric Church.
June 1, 2017 @ 7:23 am
Maybe your right about that as Gram Parsons also came from money but my main point of that post is HE IS NOT AN OUTSIDER of Music Row. He is from the exact same machine as Taylor Swift and others. In fact, the guy I mentioned that works with him and has been instrumental in his career also signed Taylor Swift and was instrumental in her career to a point. Eric Church is from the same machine as any other artist you hear on country radio. He just tries to sell himself as this rebel that he’s not. It’s all marketing.
June 1, 2017 @ 8:12 am
He may not be an “outsider to music row” but he is not a Jason Aldean or Luke Bryan…you can’t deny he’s tried to blaze his own trail within whatever big Nashville confines he resides in. George Strait was part of music row too, and made some seriously straight commercial shit, but he is a legend. This hatred for anything “corporate” is very interesting to me….I am kind of loving this discussion…and I’m loving arguing with some of you lol good stuff!
June 1, 2017 @ 8:23 am
No hatred here. I actually like a couple of songs he co-wrote with staff writers on music row. My main point is that he is not authentic when he tries to portray himself as something so different from the rest of the machine. His producer also produces Little Big Town and many others. I guess I was just trying to educate some of you that think he’s a trial blazer. That blows my mind. How can you compare him to George Strait. Strait turned the whole industry around bringing traditional country music back to radio. I wonder how old some of you are and if maybe you only know the George Strait of the last 15 years or so? You say Church isn’t an Aldean or Bryan? Do you remember that terrible song they all did together a few years ago. He’s right in there with them. All of this outsider stuff is just building a brand. A lot of people on this website are very romantic about it all but the truth is everything is calculated. Decisions about music and marketing aren’t made by Church alone. Do you really think he does whatever he wants against the label’s wishes and then they spend millions to promote the product. That just ain’t reality. Before a single goes out or a photo shoot, or an interview is set up, or what songs make an album, there is a whole group of people that have to sign off. It’s called the music BUSINESS. This is a machine at work with big money at stake.
June 1, 2017 @ 12:00 pm
Whoa, I think you’re taking my statements to the extreme. I was trying to use Strait to say YOU can be part of the “machine” (or whatever you want to call it)) and still more or less do your own thing. Also, doing one song with Bryan and Aldean doesn’t make them equals. While Bryan and Aldean have shown NO growth, only followed trends, and done the same exact song a million times over, Church has not. He has experimented, evolved, and yes, I believe, more or less done his own thing. Does that mean I think he runs around and does WHATEVER he wants all the time without his labels sign-off? No. Do I think there is no calculation and it’s just Eric Church running around calling every shot on everything? No. I never claimed I thought that. Everything is not black or white. There are always shades of grey. Anyway, agree to disagree I suppose. Interesting discussion, regardless!
June 1, 2017 @ 8:15 am
I mean, in this interview, he repeatedly refers to Nashville, and Music Row, as “we.”
I don’t think he’s ever claimed to be an outsider, business-wise. The only “rebel” claim he makes is saying that he only ever makes the music he wants to make, regardless of what the label wants…and I think The Outsiders proves that’s the case (and, again, I fucking hate that album).
June 1, 2017 @ 5:28 am
I think some folks just hate due to his success, or other lame reasons, (parents had money) If he was under the radar the past 10 years, still killing it in small clubs across the country putting out the same music, less press, a lot of the haters would be raving ‘you have to check out this guy’. If they would just listen to the full albums without the preconceived notions they would realize he has some damn good music. He may pat himself on the back a bit much but that shouldn’t take away from the music. He’s done a lot. Isbell can come off a bit pretentious at times, but I’m not letting that stop me from appreciating the music he puts out.
June 1, 2017 @ 8:04 am
I think some people are seriously over estimating this “privilege” he supposedly had as well…father sold furniture and mother was a teacher….oh yeah, big time money there lol my uncle sells furniture – he’s top level management…he does well for himself but a far cry from the prestigious upper class of America. I think there’s a degree of self-importance to a lot of musicians…they just tend to be a bit eccentric…shit, to me Sturgil Simpson comes off as sanctimonious as hell, but the SCM faithful praise his every word.
June 1, 2017 @ 8:17 am
I think Sturgill’s a bit pretentious, and that Church is a bit of a jackass.
Both of them make good music, though, so I don’t care.
June 1, 2017 @ 1:25 pm
I always hear this “haters are just jealous” type take. I think this is gets overblown a lot of the time. You could say that about any “successful” artist that’s on country radio and pretty much every traditionalist fan still wouldn’t be on their bandwagon just because they haven’t made it yet. I’m pretty sure most traditionalists would love to turn on country radio and hear real deal artists and would be happy for their success. I will agree with you some get hung up on this “privileged background” thing with so many artists when that shouldn’t matter at all. I personally just don’t care for Church’s music that much, but I’d gladly listen to one of his albums versus having to listen to artist like Aldean. But if Church is playing for free at my local dive, I still wouldn’t go to see his “act”.
June 1, 2017 @ 3:59 pm
I don’t think a lot of people are jealous, because that would lead me to believe that said people make music as well, and feel like he shouldn’t have success. I think most other music artist appreciate what he has done, their cup of tea or not. I do think there is a type of person who puts down anything popular, successful etc, without giving it an honest unbiased chance, just because of that. Not ‘cool’ or ‘underground’ enough for them, too mainstream…..and that is all they need to form a negative perspective.
June 2, 2017 @ 11:35 am
Maybe ‘jealous’ wasn’t the best word, although I have heard it used many time towards the anti pop-country crowd.. The type of person you’re describing is essentially a hipster and I just don’t think there are as many of them(on this site at least) as you think. There have been artist who have taken off and received a ton of attention(ZBB, Stapleton, Sturgil, etc) and they still get a lot of support from the traditionalists crowd.
June 2, 2017 @ 1:16 pm
I agree with some of that.
June 1, 2017 @ 7:56 am
Knew Eric Church was polarizing, but, damn, I had no idea…
June 1, 2017 @ 8:44 am
I bought one of his earlier CD’s, listened to in once and never again.
I will make it a point to pick up Mr. Misunderstood and give it a spin, though, to see what kind of music he currently produces.
He may have experienced a professional maturation over the years.
June 1, 2017 @ 11:05 am
Chief and Mr. Misunderstood are both quite good.
Sinners Like Me and Carolina are both interesting.
The Outsiders is awful.
June 1, 2017 @ 1:52 pm
All personal taste though..
I actually really like the outsiders as much as his other stuff..
June 1, 2017 @ 3:43 pm
That’s fair. I just think there are much more talented operators in the hard rock genre than Eric Church (talented at hard rock, that is).
Wrecking Ball’s a great song, though, and Talladega’s solid stuff, too.
June 1, 2017 @ 9:24 am
“Willie, Waylon, Cash, Church, Sturgill….outlaws my ass, all a bunch of posers. How many folks did they rob & kill?” – Billy The Kid
It’s all perspective.
June 1, 2017 @ 1:55 pm
Eric is totally right. And I really can’t blame him, the only newer male mainstream artists that actually have something to set them apart from the pack are Jon Pardi, William Michael Morgan, Chris Stapleton, Drake White, Mo Pitney, and to a slightly lesser extent, Craig Campbell.
June 1, 2017 @ 4:48 pm
I dont give a rats ass what anyone says, Eric Church is NOT country. His music is pure pop or pop country and has been for many years. The “I Love Your Love The Most” days in the beginning of his career was the only time he sounded somewhat country. I cant stand the guy i have always detested Eric Church, he has a terrible voice. I dont understand why this untalented jackass that plays pop music gets praised by so many traditional country fans and has such a huge fan base. Eric Church is the problem with mainstream country music so he has no room to talk bout how it all sounds the same.
June 1, 2017 @ 5:41 pm
I agree, I can’t stand his voice and he is part of the problem.
June 2, 2017 @ 4:22 am
Folks who think Eric Church is the problem with mainstream country music, are part of the problem with mainstream country music.
June 2, 2017 @ 11:41 am
How is he not a problem? Please explain. Tell me how his hardcore pop leaning music is not a problem? But chris janson and sam hunt get bagged on by this site for doing the same shit Church has been doing for many years?
June 2, 2017 @ 11:53 am
Hardcore pop LOL you’re hilarious. Relax and go listen to some Sam Hunt. It’s not THAT serious…seriously lol
June 2, 2017 @ 12:16 pm
I said hardcore pop LEANING
June 2, 2017 @ 12:21 pm
Hardcore pop though?? Like for reals? lol I wouldn’t even call Sam Hunt hardcore pop leaning. Maybe county pop leaning, even rock-pop leaning…for Sam Hunt maybe hip-hop-pop leaning…but yeah…
June 2, 2017 @ 12:37 pm
I just hate Eric Church. Anything he does in my eyes is trash. He could release a traditional country record tomorrow and id still hate his guts. I think all pop country is basically pop music because very few sounds country.
June 2, 2017 @ 12:38 pm
I can tell…lol
June 2, 2017 @ 12:48 pm
I’m genuinely confused by the idea that anyone could possibly think that Church has a similar sound to either of those guys.
June 5, 2017 @ 7:18 am
I suggest you listen to Body like a Back Road, Fix a Drink and Knives of New Orleans one after the other and then try and argue that Eric Church is in the same category as Sam Hunt or Chris Janson.
June 2, 2017 @ 8:09 am
To each his own… I find it funny though: “I Love Your Love The Most” is the one song he refers to as the one he wishes he had back. It is the one song where he does think he wrote to break in and try to appease. So you and him really don’t click at all and that’s OK.
I don’t really care for labels, genres. I guess they are necessary for trying to describe or file what we hear.
He doesn’t really fit in the box some people want their country music to fit in.
June 2, 2017 @ 1:25 pm
Was gonna say the same thing Stringbuzz. Also, I don’t think he himself would ‘label’ himself country. As far as pop leaning, to me, hardcore pop leaning music is ‘dance’, programmed, type music, stuff you would here in a club, with people dancing to it. This may be a knock on Church’s music, but I don’t think it is very ‘danceable’
June 4, 2017 @ 11:21 am
I’m trying really hard to like Eric Church. The leather and sunglasses indoors thing grinds on me a bit, but he has a few songs on each album I can somewhat enjoy. I was pissed that he butchered his line in “Luckenback Texas” on the CMT Waylon tribute a couple of months ago (around the 1:35 mark https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ZkJDL3E0cc) – looks like he may have just been drinking a bit too much. You can’t mess up on a Waylon tribute – that shit is sacred (lol). There is just an ego/attitude thing there that I’m having a hard time getting past, and the music doesn’t resonate well enough with me to let me do that.
June 4, 2017 @ 11:39 am
Looks like Toby Keith was screwing with him too, so maybe that broke his concentration.
May 7, 2022 @ 6:56 am
Eric Church is part of the homogenization of country. Plastic outlaw.