How PBS, NPR Funding Cuts Could Affect Country & Roots Music
For decades, whenever the federal budget came due in the United States, threats to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting were bandied about, especially when Republicans were in charge. Much was made over the political bias of PBS and NPR—which is true—inspiring budget hawks to threaten slashing funding. Meanwhile, others spoke up over the importance of PBS and NPR to local communities, especially rural ones—which is also true—and the cuts would never go through.
Well in 2025, they finally did. Congress passed a law to eliminate all public broadcasting funding to the tune of $1.1 billion in savings. Interestingly though, the funding cuts currently only last for the next two years, meaning they’re temporary for now.
One defense NPR always brought up for itself in these budget battles was to cite how only 2% of its national budget was publicly funded. But of course, this argument works both ways. If public funding was only 2%, why would it be existential to do without it? As NPR journalist David Folkenflik explains,
“While NPR receives just a small amount of direct federal government support, PBS and local stations rely on it far more heavily. For public radio stations, federal funding makes up, on average, 8-10% of their budgets; for PBS and its member stations, the figure stands on average at about 15%. But that level varies widely. Executives at small stations — especially those that serve rural or tribal audiences — warn they could be devastated or even knocked off the air when aid from Washington fails to arrive.”
For independent country and roots music, this threat to NPR stations plays an outsized role. Not only are some of the most robust NPR affiliates located in rural areas, NPR stations make up a large portion of the infrastructure for Americana radio, which in turn comprises a large, non-commercial alternative to the rabidly commercial radio of the country mainstream.
Where you’d never hear many of the artists you read about on Saving Country Music on your local country radio station, you very well might on the local NPR affiliate. Where country radio refuses to play singles from many of the women in country music, Americana has. Charley Crockett has achieved multiple #1 songs and #1 albums on the Americana radio chart, and is a favorite of the format, for example.
Currently in the Top 20 of the Americana Radio Albums chart, artists like the Turnpike Troubadours, Jesse Daniel, Kelsey Waldon, Tami Neilson, James McMurtry, and The Shootouts appear.
WXPN out of the University of Philadelphia is a major supporter of independent country and roots music. Roots Radio WMOT 89.5 out of middle Tennessee is the largest Americana radio station in the United States. Austin’s KUT and KUTX that support Texas artists say they will lose $1.1 million annually in the budget cuts. WAMU 88.5 FM in Washington, DC operates one of the biggest bluegrass radio stations in the world, including a 24/7 station at bluegrasscountry.org.
On the television side with PBS, you have critically-important programming such as Austin City Limits. “This is a kick in the gut, and it really does hurt,” says Terry Lickona, ACL‘s long-time Executive Producer. The show will lose a reported $3 million out of their operating budget due to the federal cuts. That makes up about 25% of their operating costs to produce 20 artist tapings, and 13 original shows per year.
Luckily, at this point, no specific station or program is proclaiming they’re doomed, though belt tightening and budget cutting are definitely on the way. NPR is no stranger to these actions, laying off 10% of their music staff in 2023 alone.
One way NPR and PBS could have insulated themselves from accusations of political bias was to try and diversify newsrooms with reporters of more varied and agnostic political ideologies. After all, these accusations have been evergreen against these outlets for decades. But despite the bias accusations being central to the threats of the public funding, this never happened. Often it’s not how NPR covers certain stories, but what they choose to cover, and what they choose not to cover where this bias comes through.
In fact, a strong case can be made that NPR’s bias has only become more pronounced and entrenched over time. It was discovered recently that NPR’s current CEO Katherine Maher specifically called out President Trump in a series of tweets she’s since said she regrets. When ABC’s Terry Moran made lesser comments about Trump advisor Stepher Miller recently, he was let go, as would be customary with any major media outlet.
NPR has stuck by Katherine Maher who unfortunately has been unable to lead NPR into calmer waters. Some dispute NPR’s alleged political bias. But for any objective observer, it’s about as clear as the bias nature of Fox News. If there is a silver lining of the budget cuts, it’s that without public funding, NPR and PBS can take whatever slant they want with their programming. It was the public funding that made this slant concerning.
A parallel phenomenon that has been putting pressure on NPR is the diminishing importance of radio—something the country music industry knows very well. Similarly, television is also a slowly dying medium as Internet programming and YouTube podcasts continue to dominate more and more of the American attention span. Though some love to characterize PBS and NPR as irreplaceable, they’re quickly becoming obsolete. This was also part of the calculus behind the recent decision by CBS to end The Late Show.
And even though NPR and PBS receive public funding, viewers and listeners still interface with plenty of corporate sponsorship reads that might as well be commercials, along with seemingly incessant pleas for donations and membership with the ever-present refrain of existential threats looming over programs, stations, and the entire public broadcasting format.
Austin City Limits was originally founded to focus on musicians from the Austin music scene and give them a national platform. While worthy bands like Silverada and Shane Smith & the Saints still wait for their opportunity, big national names such as Billie Ellish, Coldplay, and Kendrick Lamar perform on the program to entice corporate underwriters, which is code from commercial sponsors. Unfortunately, despite the public funding, some of these NPR/PBS programs still participate in clout chasing.
While Austin City Limits was running a budget deficit of $350,000 even before the recent cuts, they also have a licensing agreement with Live Nation for the multi-weekend Austin City Limits Festival each year in October. Live Nation made $23.16 billion in total revenue in 2024. Perhaps since they’re exploiting the Austin City Limits name, Live Nation should step up to help the program that made the ACL brand so valuable.
For some consumers, it’s easy to cast off PBS and NPR as unnecessary in the internet age—especially those who never take advantage of PBS or NPR programming. It’s also easy to sit back and second guess some of the organization’s moves and decisions, especially over the last few years.
But those who utilize WMOT as a resources to find their next favorite artist, enjoy Austin City Limits when they do have a new artist perform worthy of discovery, or take advantage of a local NPR affiliate’s rural farm and ranch reports and emergency warnings, these are invaluable institutions that if they go away, will be difficult to impossible to replace.
It’s true that as time goes on, the Internet is slowly replacing all of these outlets and resources, though sometimes with inferior options. Again, at the moment, the funding cuts hurt, but have not resulted in any major cancellations or shuttering of affiliates. But that doesn’t mean the funding cuts won’t affect American life in fundamental ways, especially when it comes to infrastructure supporting music that otherwise wouldn’t be heard on airwaves or seen on television at all.
July 22, 2025 @ 8:53 am
Matt Taibbi summed it up perfectly in my mind, regarding NPR:
“If you’ve reached the stage of calling the Declaration of Independence “a document that contains offensive language,” you probably shouldn’t be working as a guardian of “national” public radio. If a private outlet feels the need to go there, mazel tov, but the federal government shouldn’t be issuing Surgeon General’s warnings for its foundational ideas. If it is doing that, it’s probably appropriate to wonder what’s behind that messaging imperative.”
July 22, 2025 @ 9:21 am
I am of two minds about this issue. I think that NPR/PBS offer some excellent programming that is important to communities, including the independent country/roots music community that this website is a part of. NPR affiliates play no small role in helping to promote and support these artists, including tour support as they roll through local markets. If the NPR Americana radio network went away, this would be a big blow.
But for DECADES, the impetus for these funding cut discussions has been the political bias that’s obvious to just about everyone who listens and watches, including their staunch supporters. Why there hasn’t been efforts, even tokenary, to attempt to address these concerns and how they’re tied to public funding is beyond me, and that has put the entire public broadcasting platform under threat now. At the worst they could have hired a CEO that doesn’t come with such heavy political baggage. Hire someone actually from the country and roots community who can cover this music from an apolitical lens.
I personally was mischaracterized on NPR’s Morning Edition around the whole Lil Nas X imbroglio in 2018 when they falsely mischaracterized a story I wrote AFTER “Old Town Road” had been taken off the country charts as being the catalyst for the removal, so I’ve dealt with this first hand.
I hope that over the next two years, NPR and PBS see it in the public interest to figure out how to be public broadcasting for EVERYONE, and will get their funding renewed and be supported into the future, as long as television and radio are viable mediums.
July 22, 2025 @ 9:32 am
Exactly.
July 22, 2025 @ 9:34 am
Except that the government or the CEO doesn’t control what is written. More than 70% of the Corporation for Public Broadcasting’s federal appropriation for 2025 of US$1.1 billion flows through to roughly 1,500 independently governed local stations, most of which are NPR or PBS affiliates but some of which are unaffiliated community broadcasters. CPB headquarters retains only about 5% of that federal funding. Congress allocates funds, while community nonprofits, university boards, state authorities, or other local license holders actually own and run the stations.
Also, a national poll of likely voters released July 14, 2025, found that 53% of respondents trust public media to report news “fully, accurately and fairly,” while only 35% extend that trust to “the media in general.” A majority also opposed eliminating federal support. Both sides believe everyone is out to get them.
July 22, 2025 @ 9:58 am
I really like Matt Taibbi. He’s one of the few actual journalists out there who has integrity – and to think he used to work for Rolling Stone magazine.
July 22, 2025 @ 3:09 pm
Taibbi has written some less left-leaning commentary in the last few years, some of which I agree with. That said, I find it hard to forget the disgusting things he has written about conservative women.
July 22, 2025 @ 11:25 am
Was curious about this so looked up the transcript (I assume) referenced by Taibbi:
https://www.npr.org/2021/07/02/1012680822/examining-a-racist-passage-in-the-declaration-of-independence
Seems like a fairly reasonable discussion.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:30 pm
That passage was not erroneous. Indians routinely smashed babies against trees, slaughtered families, butchered pregnant women, and burned prisoners at the stake.
Savage is the correct description for those acts. No one in the 1770s would have looked sideways.
More historical revisionism from NPR during a time of celebration.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:57 pm
It seems fairly obvious on its face that the ears of many modern listeners would be raised at hearing the term, so they they engaged in a contextual discussion about it with a historian, who validates many of the ideas as foundational while also recognizing the document and its writers as imperfect. Just blindly celebrating or refusing to engage in a nuanced discussion would seem more biased to me. I don’t doubt that on the whole the content that NPR chooses to report skews left, but this one, which seemed really terrible to me when I saw it referenced out of context in these comments, actually comes across as pretty reasonable. (Im sure Trigger would come chase us off now for veering so far off topic.)
July 22, 2025 @ 3:44 pm
I read the transcript. It was one-sided hogwash with presences at legitimacy because a “historian” said so.
It presented the Indians as peaceful and harmless folk. Complete falsehood.
July 22, 2025 @ 1:13 pm
Savage Name Meaning
English: of Norman origin, a nickname for a wild or uncouth person, from Middle English and Old French salvage, sauvage ‘wild, untamed’ (from Late Latin salvaticus, literally ‘man of the woods’, a derivative of Latin silva ‘wood’ influenced by Latin salvus ‘whole’, i.e. natural). Compare French Sauvage .
History: Jacob Savage, born in Exeter, Devon, England, in 1604, is recorded in Essex, NJ, by the early 1630s. Edward Savage, of Huguenot descent, emigrated from Ireland to Massachusetts in 1696. His grandson and namesake, who was born in Princeton, MA, in 1761 gained fame as an artist for his portrait of George Washington (1789–90).
July 22, 2025 @ 9:17 am
Thank you for raising this issue, Trig. It is important to point out that it does tend to lean left; overall, they are very center and reliable. Comparing them to any other news outlet as well, they are center. They also cover local and state issues that are filling a void left by the shutdown of newspapers. They cover state legislatures, city councils, townships, and other regional bodies, uncovering corruption and exposing individuals who try to operate without scrutiny.
But as you point out, the music piece and programming are so crucial. They provide cultural content from books, music, the arts, and the performing arts, as well as other essential elements, that are vital to rural communities across the country. These stations serve as an information hub for rural communities that most for-profit companies, such as Tenga, aren’t going to operate in.
I really hope the cuts stay temporary.
July 22, 2025 @ 9:38 am
I haven’t listened to NPR news coverage in years, though in the 2000s and early 10s it seemed more to me that they were laundering corporate and military industrialist viewpoints from Capitol Hill in a more palatable way that could appeal to highly educated (and increasingly left leaning) audiences. The joke was that NPR stood for “Nice Polite Republicans”
July 22, 2025 @ 9:53 am
Nothing screams center like calling the Declaration of Independence “a document that contains offensive language.”
King George III would be proud.
July 22, 2025 @ 10:24 am
King George Strait likely would not
July 22, 2025 @ 10:24 am
Are you disputing the fact that it does? Every person and institution has moments they aren’t or shouldn’t be proud of. We can’t have a discussion about it without being labeled woke? I don’t understand burying history. It is what it is. I don’t feel we have to deny it, celebrate it, or feel ashamed about it. We can acknowledge it happened and be better for it.
July 22, 2025 @ 11:55 am
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript
Where is the offensive language?
July 22, 2025 @ 12:40 pm
I think the “offensive language” discussion you seem to referencing, possibly without even looking to see what it was about, had to do with the “merciless Indian Savages” part. From what I’ve read in the articles, there’s nothing that merits a woke left label deserving to be canceled. Maybe there’s more, correct me if I’m wrong.
All media is biased. PBS/NPR I see is center-left. You know that going in and adjust your expectations. Is there far left content sometimes? Certainly, which is I reason I haven’t bothered with it in years. However, it’s more center than Fox, CNN, and MSNBC. I’d prefer to keep a center-left outlet in a world where most outlets are far left or right.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:46 pm
See Moses Mendoza’s post above. It’s a reply in the original thread.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:52 pm
“He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.”
I know of the clause, and none of that is offensive.
Every item in that grievance is correct. The Indians practiced total warfare. Their hit-and-run warparty tactics were hugely effective and nearly impossible to defend against. They massacred men, women, and children indiscriminately, forced prisoners to run the gauntlet, regularly burnt prisoners at the stake, smashed babies against trees, and tomahawked pregnant women and children. That is savage behavior. Many British officers hated using Indian allies because of their tendencies for wanton destruction. Burgoyne’s Saratoga campaign lost its momentum after he tried to corral their raids.
If NPR and PBS want taxpayer dollars, play it down-the-center.
My hometown area was frontierland during the Revolutionary War. I am well-aware of the true history, and not the guilt-ridden narratives pushed today. The Indians were the best hit-and-run and ambush fighters in history. Well, you could argue for the Monguls in the top spot. Our best Indian fighters, the Simon Kentons, the Samuel Bradys, and Lewis Wetzels, only reached that level by copying everything their foes did.
I don’t care that some ivory-tower professor or soft modern society thinks it is a terrible blight and mean passage. It was reality as Thomas Jefferson and company knew it. The Indians were a powerful and terrible enemy.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:25 pm
I agree with this. Compared to other outlets they actual political reporting is bland and unbiased-sounding (despite the actual beliefs of the people speaking them). Often they will just read from AP news.
I see nothing wrong with funding the music side of public radio – especially with licensing fees being so high. Part of me also doesn’t care that they are losing funding when I universally read lies and mischaracterizations of why Colbert and the Late Show are being cancelled because virtually all of the Public Radio employees are Liberals and will be parroting those same lies. I’m not fully sure how to defend the music side while also letting them lay in the bed that they made since things got hyper partisan after Obama’s second term.
July 22, 2025 @ 1:23 pm
So the indigenous white man was defending itself against the immigrant Indian savages? All our land acquisition was done in good faith?
July 22, 2025 @ 12:36 pm
“It is important to point out that it does tend to lean left; overall, they are very center and reliable.”
Hunter Biden’s laptop and the Covid origins reporting would like to challenge your assertion…
July 22, 2025 @ 9:18 am
💯 on 🎯
July 22, 2025 @ 9:23 am
My compliments to Trigger for writing such an eloquent and balanced take on a topic that usually devolves into a virtual fist fight in mere seconds. My counterpoint to the argument that NPR/PBS also do good in instances such as exposing new music artists or providing rural farm reports doesn’t ultimately make the case that the taxpayer should therefore fund it.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:39 pm
We’re talking about an anachronism as well. You could make an argument at a point in history that reporting on music outside of the mainstream zeitgeist and exposing the public to that music was worthy of money from the treasury. But what percentage of people under the age of 50 are being exposed to new music through PBS/NPR? 5% would probably be a generous guess.
July 22, 2025 @ 1:34 pm
Tiny desk concerts cost the taxpayer billions.
What a scam.
July 22, 2025 @ 9:31 am
I’m sure when the funding was first passed and established it was very much needed. PBS offered so many early learning programs to kids when there were really only the Big 3 broadcast networks to choose from. But does anyone really think in this day in age were you can find news or entertainment about anywhere in the palm of your hand, they still need to be federally funded and supported? They do give a platform to a lot of Americana and independent artists, but so do hundreds of other online radio stations and programs. I’m also sure the affiliates that offer value and entertainment to their local areas will have no problems with their communities stepping up to support them.
July 22, 2025 @ 9:51 am
They were never needed. The public was gaslighted into believing it was the case.
Radio and television, like most things, were irreparably harmed by government intervention. The DuPont Network would have survived if the government hadn’t limited stations.
July 22, 2025 @ 10:18 am
The DuMont Network would have likely survived if they could have gotten the two licenses they requested, giving them the maximum of five allowed at the time. The DuPont Network did not survive because it never existed.
July 22, 2025 @ 11:56 am
Bring back the edit button!
July 22, 2025 @ 9:49 am
NPR and PBS dug their graves.
They chose not to play fair. The bill always comes due eventually.
The lesson is worth losing a few Austin Center Limits shows.
Country music will be fine.
July 22, 2025 @ 10:31 am
Exactly! When your newsroom employs 87 registered Democrats and 0 Republicans, you deserve to be defunded!
July 22, 2025 @ 11:57 am
Jeff thinks that ratio represents down-the-center reporting!
July 22, 2025 @ 10:46 am
Exactly.
July 22, 2025 @ 1:04 pm
Republican majority media outlets have never been beacons of the arts (Unless you want to count the 700 Club and Pat Robertson…but that was just creativity in stealing money from gullible old people.)
I held much more hardline Republican views in the 2000’s and I never had an issue with PBS and NPR then – and this was before all forms of media moved online I don’t understand shitting on what PBS has been aside from very recently with the pushing the Covid Vax to children on Sesame Street and including Gay Pride stuff on kid’s shows. I guess that is what created this whole divide – identity politics. It took people away from talking about issues and topics to internalizing the political divide and just picking their tribe and defending it’s talking points down to the letter.
There are people who are moderate on both sides and I think once the smoke clears that will be the majority of us, but the forces on both sides are too strong to let those voices speak most loudly.
July 22, 2025 @ 9:55 am
There was a time when there was no “public radio” at all, and what we got was a creative ecosystem that gave us American music.
Eventually commercial music got corporatized, and eventually cosy public/private partnerships developed (there’s a nasty word for that), and music was affected by all those changes.
Now the landscape has changed again. It is cheap and easy to make content to reach a global audience. No one needs to depend on any source or filter. But of course, some people like to push their preferred content and act as a filter with State Muscle. This makes them feel important and gives them purpose in life. Sorry, but that day has come and gone. No one cares, and no one needs that. We can all find people like Trigger, voluntarily.
Make music and share it. Talk about it. Send links to your friends and family. Your grandparents and great-grandparents didn’t complain. They entertained themselves and created entire traditions for you to participate in. Stop consuming all the time. Start producing. It’s more fun.
One of the best couples in our county own a barn on an idyllic piece of land south of town. They host barn parties. People bring food, spouses, lovers, and kids, and there’s a dance with live music in the barn, which is open on both sides. Teens in the hayloft. Cornfields across the road. Woods behind. Fireflies. That’s the way you do it.
Heaven.
July 22, 2025 @ 10:50 am
Amen.
July 22, 2025 @ 10:03 am
I hear the announcement on WMOT (Roots radio Nashville) last night about the fear of them being unable to pay for music licensing fees because of the budget cuts. I appreciate how they don’t have commercials and how they highlight independent artists and a good selection of other artists and genres.
I also know that a Democrat administration wouldn’t fund public radio if it esposed strictly Conservative viewpoints. I regularly listen to WMOT but I haven’t been able to listen to NPR for awhile now because every time I turned it on it was always gender ideology bullshit.
July 22, 2025 @ 10:10 am
Is radio viable anymore with so many streaming? TV is probably still viable but just about and not for long. In the UK, the BBC is the public broadcaster of radio and TV. It is often criticised and accused of a lack of objectivity (with some justification) and it’s programming is often poor although it does have some good moments. However, not enough to justify the cost. It is funded with a TV licence (£175 or about US $230), which you have to pay if you watch live TV, whether or not you use the BBC. The BBC is increasingly finding it difficult to justify its licence fee. I am not sure it can. I wonder if public broadcasting has a place in the modern age. Does public broadcasting do enough to justify the cost? I think not in the UK but cannot comment on the USA. An interesting and thought provoking article.
July 22, 2025 @ 10:40 am
Paramount just reached a streaming rights deal with Trey Parker and Matt Stone (South Park) for five years and $1.5 billion. Time for the UK to defund the BBC. They have nothing to lose but their chains.
July 22, 2025 @ 10:53 am
Oh, smack.
Tell it.
July 22, 2025 @ 10:21 am
PBS is garbage propaganda coming from the British Crown through the BBC, and always has been.
Today’s Democrats are mostly loyal Tory subjects, hence PBS’s thinly veiled hatred of Our Declaration of Independence.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:01 pm
The Tories were respectable foes. Today’s Democrats are soulless automations.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:11 pm
Let’s please keep the discussion on PBS, NPR, and the public funding surrounding them. Not sure how we got into global politics here, but it’s a tangent.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:36 pm
The Democrats are Fabian Socialists.
July 22, 2025 @ 1:41 pm
PBS is run by the BBC and billed to the US taxpayer.
Example:
Comforting British Dramas to Stream Right Now!
If you’re in need of comfort, warmth, and escape from reality, there’s no better place to turn than period dramas from the country that brought the world “Keep Calm & Carry On.” Here are several British series from PBS MASTERPIECE you can stream right now for a bingeable infusion of solace, fortitude, inspiration…and the obligatory sassy zinger! Watch them all with PBS Passport, an added member benefit.
https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/masterpiece/specialfeatures/comforting-british-dramas-to-stream-right-now/#
July 22, 2025 @ 1:50 pm
PBS was the only reason I got to see episodes of Red Dwarf, Black Adder, and Fawlty Towers growing up, so you start coming for the Brit Coms, you get on the fightin’ side of me. 🙂
July 22, 2025 @ 3:38 pm
Yeah, dirty British comedies were somehow “educational television” in the American colonies in the 80s and 90s.
PBS showed tons of prurient nudity on Monte Python when I was a kid, not to mention nearly every other joke was homosexual in nature.
I hope you are joking about fighting, because this American will gladly beat your redcoat-loving ass.
Fuck the British Crown.
July 22, 2025 @ 4:22 pm
Yeah, comments like this are a great example of how politics is the domain of the irrational. So because I geeked out Red Dwarf at 1:00 am Sunday mornings when I was a teen, you feel the need to assert that you will “beat my redcoat-loving ass”? Like seriously, what the fuck dude? This is an article about how public funding cuts could affect country music played on NPR stations.
What I also find so intriguing about this issue is nearly ALL of the anger over this issue is coming from the political right. The Facebook comments section on this subject is even worse. Republicans won. The funding was stripped. Yet it’s people from the right who are acting like the aggrieved party and are seething over this issue. Most of the people on the left are disappointed, but see it as inevitable, and are simply stepping up to support these stations directly.
Also, now that I’ve received physical threats over sharing by love for Britcom’s, we’re officially done with this off-topic tangent.
July 22, 2025 @ 3:47 pm
Americans have always held a cultural inferiority to the British.
You see it in how PBS presents British entertainment as high brow and why so many of our villains use a British accent.
That being said, the British gave literature Spenser, Milton, Shakespeare, Donne, CS Lewis, and more greats. Our literary tradition compares poorly.
July 22, 2025 @ 4:25 pm
“Americans have always held a cultural inferiority to the British.”
That is absolutely insane, and most British people would disagree with you as well. America has held more cultural cache every since WW2. The Beatles, Rolling Stones, Led Zepplin all emulated American artists.
“You see it in how PBS presents British entertainment as high brow”
You clearly never saw an episode of Red Dwarf then.
And again, why the fuck are we talking about Britain in this thread?
July 22, 2025 @ 11:09 am
Comparing NPR to Fox News is hilarious. No, public broadcasting is not as biased as entertainment masquerading as news.
July 22, 2025 @ 11:22 am
For the record, I compared the bias slant of coverage of NPR to Fox News, not how that news is delivered. Obviously, Fox News and NPR are on the opposite side of the spectrum in that regard.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:59 pm
Many people think NPR is leftist entertainment masquerading as news. Including people who worked there at the highest levels for a decade. The difference is Fox News makes money in the free market because people want to watch it. NPR is propped up by the government. And by the way, I can give you multiple examples of so-called “entertainment” reported by Fox News that turned out to be absolutely 100% true while NPR was pushing total and utter bullshit.
July 22, 2025 @ 3:30 pm
I haven’t watched FOX News since they canned Tucker but pretending that NPR resides on higher moral ground is absurd.
Both pander to a certain constituency. NPR merely has better PR.
July 22, 2025 @ 11:16 am
Watch out!
Trigger wants PBS to keep sucking taxpayer money while they teach children to hate the nation which houses them and gives them opportunity. Triggster believes every single liberal left trope imaginable, including how the WNBA should be paid the same money as the NBA despite taking 45% of their funding from NBA subsidies because women do not bring in the same crowd and, henceforth and so-on, DO NOT bring in the same money.
But fair is fair, even if you aren’t earning it. Right, Trigginator?
Let that heart bleed, Triggy-poo. We gotchu, bruv!
Keep doubling down on stupid and wrong, Trigger. You’ll get there someday.
July 22, 2025 @ 11:44 am
You stumbled on the wrong site my friend. Incoherent ranting about stuff that is not even mentioned nor implied in any way in this fair, well-researched, and fact-laden article is just ridiculous. Please go back to whatever rock you crawled out from under and stay the hell out of SCM’s comment section. This is NOT a political website to lob your bombs in. When the heck has Trigger ever uttered a word on this site about the WNBA???
Sorry SCM readers but this is the kind of garbage that drives me nuts and I’m already in a foul mood. I’m sure nobody, including Trigger, took this idiot (or idiot bot) seriously but c’mon.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:11 pm
I’m one of the most conservative people you’ll ever meet, and no fan of the agenda that NPR puts forth. That said, this is one of the most pathetic takes I have ever read on this site. There’s just no place for it here.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:11 pm
One defense NPR always brought up for itself in these budget battles was to cite how only 2% of its national budget was publicly funded.”
“While NPR receives just a small amount of direct federal government support, PBS and local stations rely on it far more heavily. For public radio stations, federal funding makes up, on average, 8-10% of their budgets; for PBS and its member stations, the figure stands on average at about 15%.”
Here’s the thing I can’t figure out, and I actually worked at a public TV station many years ago. -Why- are the rural stations more dependent on that federal money compared to stations in major markets? Couldn’t you just redeploy the donations and corporate sponsor money to stations where they are most needed? This has always seemed like a pretty basic accounting puzzle more than anything else.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:44 pm
I imagine the donations often have strings attached, or are advertising dollars masquerading as ‘donations’.
July 22, 2025 @ 1:13 pm
Funny, I live in a big city whose PBS will be fine. I’m fine with hehaw land losing their PBS. It’s what they want and we’ll both be happy.
July 22, 2025 @ 3:45 pm
You’ll be fine in the big city until we stop delivering food and your vibrant immigrant communities get hungry.
July 22, 2025 @ 3:49 pm
“I think we shall be [virtuous], as long as agriculture is our principal object, which will be the case, while there remain vacant lands in any part of America. When we get piled upon one another in large cities, as in Europe, we shall become corrupt as in Europe, and go to eating one another as they do there.”
-Thomas Jefferson
The Master of Monticello called it again. The man was a genius.
July 22, 2025 @ 3:53 pm
That’s why you shouldn’t keep pets like cats and dogs if you live in the city.
July 22, 2025 @ 2:31 pm
Because they’re poors? The same reason rural states can’t pull themselves up by their bootstraps. They leach federal dollars and talk about self reliance
July 22, 2025 @ 12:24 pm
Not going to get involved in the politics here, just telling anyone who cares that WUMB Boston has supported Americana/roots/folk/traditional country music for decades. They stream, and have been a regular listening stop for me dating back to my years living in the Boston area (that’s the ’80s). I’d hate to see this station disappear. It is totally non-political, just as my favorite public classical music station here in Vermont is, and their presence would be very much missed.
July 22, 2025 @ 4:02 pm
I often stream WUMB from the other side of the country. They do an OK job of hiding it, but they are in the tank for the insane gender and racial ideology that’s sent the Democratic Party to the shoals generally. The mask slips sometimes.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:24 pm
If you own a house, and on the front porch every night you put on a lovely concert for the neighborhood to enjoy, but then meanwhile in the basement you’re cooking heroin for distribution night and day, and you’ve been repeatedly warned to stop with the heroin but you repeatedly deny and refuse, then don’t come crying to me when the cops come and shut it all down.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:36 pm
I enjoy Antiques Roadshow, but if it is a casualty of this development, so be it.
Per the free market, the good shows will survive, and the subsidized baloney will disappear.
National radio and television are relics, especially when they have betrayed their core concept and principles for decades.
Years ago, when conservatives mentioned the mainstream network bias, they were told to “make their own channels.” The same goes for this situation.
July 22, 2025 @ 12:54 pm
Or I can come to this website for free and hang onto my tax dollars. If it’s truly valuable, it will survive in the marketplace. If it’s not it will fail. There is so much content available on the Internet for free these days that it is almost impossible to justify public funding of any media source. This is how you get a $37 trillion deficit. You think the government should be involved in everything and anything.
July 22, 2025 @ 1:32 pm
The defunding of NPR can’t come soon enough for me! You only have to tune in for a minute to hear the nonstop “Orange Man Bad!” rant on every one of their programs. When they take a break from abusing Trump, they start their “Straight White Capitalist Christian Man Bad!” rant. It never ends! NPR has turned into a leftist propaganda machine!
The good old days of “A Prairie Home Companion” are long gone!
July 22, 2025 @ 2:26 pm
All NPR had to do was put a minimum of effort into being non-partisan. Any truthful listener knows they just could not help themselves…and here we are.
July 22, 2025 @ 4:03 pm
I like NPR/PBS/public radio’s americana/roots stuff as much as anybody, but this could not have happened to a nicer group of people, and not a minute too soon.
July 22, 2025 @ 4:05 pm
NPR brought this on themselves. Now get the chainsaw out.