Live Review – Sturgill Simpson at ACL Live
Sturgill Simpson embarked on the second night of a two-night sold-out stop at The Moody Theater in downtown Austin, on Friday (5-6). It was the second night on his current tour, and one of the first glimpses of what fans can expect from an expanded lineup, and a new sound that veers slightly away from the country style Sturgill’s career has been known for up to this point.
Seeing how Sturgill has been so outspoken about his desire for folks to listen to his new album A Sailor’s Guide to Earth in sequential order, it was no surprise the show started off with the album being played in its entirety and relatively loyal to the recording, aided by a three-piece horn section on a riser at the back of the stage, and guitar player Laur Joamets switching back and forth from lead to pedal steel guitar. The live rendition of the new album was inspired and salty, and had the ACL Live crowd enraptured.
As many may have seen already, Sturgill spends some of the time in the current lineup not playing guitar, but walking around the stage with the mic. “I’m still trying to figure out what do do with my hands,” Sturgill said at one point. During the second song, “Breaker’s Roar,” he sat on the edge of the stage with his feet dangling down into the buffer zone between the stage and the crowd as he quilled out the quiet song like he was conducting story time for grade schoolers. During another slower song, he sat down on the row of vintage amps on stage—their power bulbs glowing like a disjointed string of Christmas lights across the front of the horn riser. When he was playing guitar, Sturgill would switch between acoustic and electric, though it was strictly electric for the Sailor’s Guide to Earth material.
The folks waiting for the more country-oriented songs would have to be patient for a while longer after the end of the Sailor’s Guide to Earth segment, as selections like Simpson’s cover of “The Promise,” and other more rock-sounding efforts continued into the 2nd half of the show. Then Sturgill sang a rousing version of his Gospel-feeling song “Walk That Road,” and from there the sound turned country hard and heavy. The half-timed “Livin’ The Dream” came next, leading into “Long White Line” that Sturgill prefaced by waylaying those who would question his use of horns in the band.
“People talk so much shit. They can kiss my ass. Another famous country singer from around here used horns. Nobody gave him shit.”
During “Long White Line,” Sturgill also changed the lyric in one stanza from, “Looking for the end of that long white line” to “Looking for some more horns for my band.”
Piss and vinegar pockmarked the presentation from Sturgill, as it has most all of the shows at the start of his current tour. At one point, he pointed out someone in the crowd on their cell phone. “Look at him, checking his Facebook and shit,” Sturgill chided as the crowd craned their necks in unison, following Sturgill’s hairy eyeball affixed on the guilty party.
After rattling off a good dose of country material, and making reference to a show at Austin’s Rattle Inn a few years ago that only eight people attended (present company included), the concert went in a strange direction, with the band playing an extended interval of funk riffs, including one that didn’t seem to be tied to any specific song, didn’t really go anywhere, and seemed even more self-indulgent than putting horns in your country band.
“We’re going to stretch it out a little,” Sturgill said into the microphone, and then proceeded to hang on the same generic funk riff for a good four minutes without any real change or progression whatsoever. Part of the problem was there was no real groove to lay down in. Finding a groove is not just about playing the right notes and switching over to the wah wah pedal. It’s a feeling that was hard to discern if Sturgill’s band ever found. Even at the risk of being called out from the stage, some folks started fumbling with their phones as the funk portion of the presentation became elongated, and seemed to expose the difficulty of trying to fill two hours without the aid of an opening band.
Three or four times in one song, Sturgill and the band would enact these sonic flourishes that basically involved Sturgill and Laur Joamets raking their guitar strings as fast as they could while sliding a bar chord pattern up the neck to create a crescendo. This has become a signature of the Sturgill Simpson live experience, but usually once, maybe twice in a set. After the 7th or 8th time affixed to various songs, it had lost its magic, like watching the woman getting sawed in half over and over to the point where the entertainment value was lost to cliché, even if you still hadn’t figured out the trick.
After the indiscriminate funk number, Sturgill said, “The next record is gonna be reggae. And it will be made with a Roland TR-8 drum machine and a bunch of synthesizers just to piss people off!”
At this point late in the show, the anger being emitted from the stage didn’t feel spontaneous and in good spirit. It felt palpable and premeditated. As a country music fan or someone who started listening to Sturgill’s music within the confines of country, you couldn’t help but to feel somewhat alienated.
It is unlikely Sturgill Simpson’s next album will be a drum machine-driven reggae affair. But the aggressiveness towards fans who put their heart and soul into Simpson’s music and career, built him up from playing in front of eight people in an Austin bar to selling out two consecutive nights at a 2,700-capacity venue, and who may have wished that Sturgill would have stuck a little closer to his country roots, was hard to overlook.
Along with the misnomers about Sturgill Simpson being akin to Waylon Jennings or a purveyor of “drug music,” a similar misconception is that Sturgill’s music is only bred from love. Maybe this is partly true of his recorded efforts, even though within his albums are hidden and overt jabs at plenty of institutions and ideologies. But in the live situation, Simpson is at his best when anger is guiding his hands. Anger is where the Sunday Valley sound emanated from (Sturgill’s first band), and anger is where Sturgill finds the uninhibited passion to be himself.
Throughout Sturgill Simpson’s rise—through the High Top Mountain and Metamodern Sounds era—his anger was noticeably missing. That is why despite the praise he was receiving from many sectors, and the undeniable traction his career was experiencing, those who saw what Sturgill Simpson was capable of previously knew he was holding something back. By choking his anger back, the result was an awkwardness on stage—a disquieted energy where he didn’t know what to do with himself as a performer. 2013 Sturgill Simpson would have never had the rocks to walk out on stage without a guitar to help steady his hands and hide behind.
Beyond the new material, or any talk of horn sections, the unleashing of Sturgill Simpson’s anger is the strongest takeaway from what you can expect from his current live show. He’s moves around the stage like a lion circling his prey. He points to the crowd to finish lines of songs. He calls out members of the crowd or things he doesn’t like, be damned the repercussions, or what may end up on YouTube or in the press the next day. And he is a much more magnetic and engaging performer for it. If you had overlooked Sturgill’s singing prowess before, there is no escaping it now. It all blossoms out from his vocals.
And forget the idea of Sturgill Simpson killing his ego. To stand in front of 2,700 people and sing intimate songs meant for your son and blistering covers of well-recognized rock anthems, you must be an egomaniac. And that’s okay. It comes with the territory. It’s arguably essential. And instead of acting guilty about it, it should be embraced and channeled into entertainment value. Music is not refined visual art hanging in a quiet space, it is raucous entertainment at its core, and a little bit of cockiness is necessary for any performer to pull off what Sturgill is trying to accomplish.
But there is collateral damage in the way Sturgill is being so pointed and indiscriminate with his words and approach at the moment. He’s trying to piss people off as if it’s a virtue, or an element of performance art. That is not entirely a poor decision in itself, but some of the people who are at the receiving end of his pointed words are the very same people who helped him ascend to his current musical pulpit.
The misconceptions about Sturgill’s current music run both ways. Sure, there are some closed-minded rednecks who fail to understand that even Bob Wills used horns in his music, and Merle Haggard died with a saxophone player in his band. But many others were just hoping for a more country effort from his last record, and are still looking forward to one in the future, if they’re not turned off by the scorn coming from Sturgill these days, and aided by the “non genre” press who only know country music from the outside looking in.
Upon the “country-ness” of his music, Sturgill’s message has been mixed at best lately, and downright contradictory at other times, and this has put some of his fans in a difficult position. Instead of building bridges, Sturgill Simpson is drawing lines in the sand, and looking to weed out certain elements from his fan base that he’s apparently embarrassed by. At a recent show in Dallas, Simpson said, “But don’t you worry, you won’t see my ass at the CMA’s or the ACM’s. Cornball, hayseed bullshit. It might take 10 years, but there’s gonna come a day when they need me, and I’ll give them two of THESE”—holding up his two middle fingers in the air.
Years ago a move like this might be considered defiant and cool. It certainly was when Sturgill sang “You won’t hear my songs on the radio, see me on the CMA,” in his song “Life Ain’t Fair”—a song he later changed that lyric to, and eventually would completely strike from his set due to his own disillusionment with the message. Now Simpson’s perspective has regressed, and this sentiment seems childish, spiteful, and outdated coming from him. First, there is nothing cornball or hayseed about either the ACM’s and CMA’s. Cornball and hayseed would be a spectacular improvement to these presentations. And by flipping them off, he’s basically flipping off Chris Stapleton by proxy, who is the reigning king of both at the moment. He’s also calling out “hayseeds,” which is offensive slang to many of the same rural people who identified with Simpson’s earlier music.
Things are changing in country, and for the better. Progress is finally being made in the effort to return the music back to the people, to open the music up to more creative freedom, and to usher in more diversity in the performer base. And Sturgill Simpson was supposed to be a part of that effort. And he would have been if he had just stuck a little bit closer to his established sound and message, and didn’t start hurling grenades from the stage. Sturgill was at the tip of the spearhead, and partly responsible for this new upward momentum. Now quite frankly, he risks jeopardizing that momentum by side stepping it and impugning the people who want to see continued improvement.
If Sturgill Simpson wants to run off and make a different style of music, that’s completely within his right as an artist, and he should be supported in that endeavor by his true fans, especially if the effort is admirable, which A Sailor’s Guide to Earth is. And it has always been unfair to Sturgill, or anyone to lump the burden of being a “Country Music Savior” on their shoulders. But Sturgill also can’t turn around and blame others for being ignored by country music institutions. It was all right there for Sturgill. Chris Stapleton had shattered the glass ceilings for him. No “hayseeds” or “assholes” were in his way. Only Sturgill himself.
There has always been an unsettledness about Sturgill (see above), but the unsheathing of it during the early shows of his current tour has been a little unnerving. And though it will be raining plaudits from the majority of media outlets in the always-sunny echo chamber that permeates the music press these days, this dissenting opinion is not solo. Kevin Curtain writing for the Austin Chronicle about the 1st installment of Sturgill’s Austin stint, and partially blaming a bad sound setup and a sore throat from Sturgill concluded, “Eventually, they … closed down a strange two-hour set that felt like the first night of tour – propelled equally by fearlessness and discomfort. Rule one in Sturgill Simpson’s sailing guide: Captains don’t wear life jackets.”
If you asked yourself at the beginning of the evening, “Are the horns essential?” Only on one or two of the songs would you have answered, “yes,” even though there were a few more that featured horn solos. But horns were not the problem here. It was Sturgill’s attitude. It disrupted the positive vibe that wanted to take hold of the room, was counter to the message of his music, and the final third of the set felt devoid of message or direction at all.
Sturgill Simpson put on an enjoyable show and will have no issues having most attendees eating out of his hands as he criss crosses the country with his new lineup and material. But the final portion of his second Austin show was one of the few disappointing efforts witnessed in his career, and the anger towards well-meaning country fans is unhelpful and confounding.
Dirk Laguna
May 9, 2016 @ 8:43 am
I know all artists evolve and change. That said, I miss Sunday Valley…
Country Music Archive Brazil
May 9, 2016 @ 9:20 am
Hey, New (arrogant) Sturgill. You’re not at the Country Music throne. You sing very well, their songs are good, but there is only one person who can record a reggae record, and this person is called Willie Nelson.
The Original WTF Guy
May 11, 2016 @ 1:11 am
Uh, what? The only person who can record a reggae record is Willie Nelson? I’m guessing there are hundreds of artists from Jamaica who might take a different perspective. Now, there may only be one old, white, red-haired, dope-smoking *country* singer that can record a reggae record, but even there I believe I would disagree.
Country Music Archive Brazil
May 11, 2016 @ 9:27 am
Hey dude. That was just irony. But… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countryman_%28album%29
Jim Bob
May 9, 2016 @ 9:27 am
Eh, if I’d spent the last couple years hearing everyone call me the 2nd coming of Waylon and the savior of country music, calling all of my music psychedelic country about drugs, and watching bandwagon hipster douche bags filling my audience, I’d be a little pissed off, too. Kinda surprised the guy hadn’t snapped already.
But at the end of the day, as long as Sturgill’s making great music he can be as angry as he wants to be. Hell, I kinda like it.
Charlie
May 9, 2016 @ 9:53 am
‘Nuff said. Drop that mic, Jim Bob. 200 likes to you, sir.
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 10:51 am
“I’d be a little pissed off, too.”
Yes, but at who?
Jim Bob
May 9, 2016 @ 11:00 am
Whover’s standing in front of me. Especially the guy standing in front of me checking his phone. Yeah, especially that guy.
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 11:15 am
Okay, but the problem is some of the things Sturgill is saying is catching folks who just simply hoped that he had made a more country-oriented record in the crossfire, and those folks feel alienated and abandoned. And I’m not entirely talking about the people saying, “Horns don’t belong in country!” There is that element to it, but that’s not what is at the heart of this issue.
And by the way, I know this article is once again one of my convoluted efforts that is likely to be misunderstood my many. But please note that I still felt like my experience at Sturgill’s show was more positive than negative. I also don’t think his anger is an entirely bad thing. As I said above, I think it was what was missing in Sturgill’s music over the last few years. I think he is a better performer when he’s angry. I welcome the new attitude. My issue is that this anger is not always being channeled in the proper way.
Jim Bob
May 9, 2016 @ 11:39 am
Yeah, I totally get where you’re coming from and I can’t say I really disagree. Hell, I would count as one of those wishing he’d stayed more country and getting caught in the crossfire.
I was just trying to look at it from his point of view-if I went from virtual anonymity, playing to 8 people, to almost overnight having people nationwide putting words in my mouth and labels on my back I’d be pissed off. And I wouldn’t really know who specifically to be pissed off at, so it’d be directed at just about anybody.
But I also know you’ve covered Sturgill more than anyone else (and done a WAY better job of it btw), so I know nothing I’ve just said is something you’re not already very well aware of. More just my opinion that I should feel alienated and abandoned by it, but I kinda get where it’s coming from so it doesn’t bother me a bit.
Big Cat
May 9, 2016 @ 6:21 pm
Well said. Ironically reminds me a lot of Kurt Cobain’s struggles at the end with much of the same. Hopefully Sturgill keeps it together. I don’t blame the guy; he’s constantly being pulled in every direction and seemingly pissing people off no matter which direction he goes.
But I disagree with the review. Sturgill’s always struggled with anger. Seen him kick a monitor and cuss the crowd out for bad sound in 2014. He’s had a chip on stage since SV.
Of course this couldnt be written without a Chris Stapleton holy grail reference. Fuck that. Music needs attitude and Sturgill has it.
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 7:21 pm
Today I’ve had people chide me for comparing Sturgill to Chris Stapleton, which I clearly didn’t. I’ve had people chide me for saying that Sturgill “owes” something to Chris Stapleton, which he clearly doesn’t. Now the fact that I mentioned Chris Stapleton’s name in passing as part of a 20-paragraph review is being seized up to say I had to make a “Holy Grail” reference.
What I said about Chris Stapleton is what I said. And nothing else should be implied, inferred, or assumed. THe ONLY reason I mentioned Chris Stapleton, and very briefly, is because it was Sturgill Simpson’s “Metamodern Sounds in Country Music” that very directly inspired Chris Stapleton to record “Traveller,” which has now become the best-selling country music album in the last two years. We all saw that famous photo from GQ with Stapleton, Sturgill, and Jason Isbell standing in an alley together. Stapleton stretched the limits of where an artist like Sturgill Simpson could go. That doesn’t mean I’m licking Stapleton’s asshole, comparing him to Sturgill, or anything else.
The problem here, still, is that the people who enjoy Sturgill’s new direction are making incorrect, wild-eyed assumptions about the people who don’t, and admonishing many of them for things they don’t believe. And Sturgill Simpson is leading this charge. Go read my review of “A Sailor’s Guide.” It is mostly positive. This review is more positive than negative. But if you dare say something critical about Sturgill, you’re a closed-minded, simple, hayseed asshole.
And I’m not saying that Sturgill hasn’t emitted anger on stage previously. We’re all products of our own experiences, and I’ve seen Sturgill live as much as anyone. In my opinion, this current tour is the re-emergence of angry Sturgill. This opinion also appears to be validated by other professional reviewers.
Big Cat
May 10, 2016 @ 4:08 am
Love the reply. Love the site. I’m just personally tired of hearing some of same rhetoric over and over (not just you).
It’s a new age. Social media and web have changed everything. Let’s just all hope for the sake of music sturgill keeps it together because I can easily see him saying “fuck it” and bowing stage left.
Jt
May 9, 2016 @ 7:43 pm
Agree completely. Fuck country radio and any who base their career on radio and the asshats who are running Nashville Pop music.
As a fan, if you take it personal when hearing Sturgill being critical and unleashing his vitriol …then you are probably one of the people he was directing that vitriol at.
I’m a Sturgill fan, a Rodney Crowell fan, a Reckless Kelly fan…etc. I’m not a specific country music fan. Especially not country radio.
Long live those that buck and spit in the system’s face.
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 8:41 pm
Who mentioned country radio? What does that have to do with anything.
SteveG
May 10, 2016 @ 6:57 am
Widespread critical acclaim and commercial success must really suck.
Fuzzy TwoShirts
May 9, 2016 @ 10:11 am
Sturgill is off his rocker, and in a good way. He doesn’t play anybody’s game or play by someone else’s rules. I bought my tickets and am looking forward to seeing him.
Will he dethrone Dailey and Vincent as the best show I’ve ever seen? I don’t expect him to.
Sturgill’s not a “real” person, an accessible everyman like Jamie Dailey or Dolly Parton. He’s got more in common with Thelonious Monk, Miles Davis and Axl Rose than with the types of “real” people “normally” associated with Country Music.
And let me be clear: I’m not saying he isn’t authentic. He’s as authentic and honest as they come, but he’s not a “regular” kind of person. He has something going on inside him that us “normal” people can never comprehend. He’s one of those people who just needs to cut loose, break rules, and let his emotions run wild because he’s so intense on the inside that if he isn’t out of control he’ll just waste away inside.
and he’s kind of anti-social by nature, that much seems obvious. The constant attention he’s receiving must get real under his skin.
He’s one of those rare people who plays music because it’s the only way to make sense of his complicated emotions.
He’s a genius, but more of a Nikola Tesla type mad genius than an Einstein type genius.
Coop
May 9, 2016 @ 10:46 am
Goddamn Fuzzy. This, this is it. I would try to add something, but you just verbalized (or rather, scribed) exactly my feelings on this.
More Jim “Lizard King” Morrison than Johnny Cash.
And it’s awesome!
GregN
May 9, 2016 @ 3:55 pm
Trig, you know I respect and appreciate your opinions. The charges on my credit card are proof of that!
But to be honest, I don’t give 2 craps if he’s country, angry, or horny. This man is making music like I haven’t heard since Marvin or Shawn Phillips, genre be damned. My 33 year old daughter, upon first hearing this album, said “I hear Shawn at times”. And she knows his music inside out.
My other daughter, 32, has seen Sturgill live twice now in Seattle and is a HUGE Nirvana fan too. She’s flying home and we’re making the drive from Chicago to Milwaukee to see him early June as a family.
Bottom line, if the music moves you (as it does us), I don’t care if he plays with his back to the audience or gives us multiple fingers.
We aren’t there to “support” him, we’re there to appreciate him and be moved by the music.
Jack Williams
May 9, 2016 @ 8:04 pm
Bottom line, if the music moves you (as it does us), I don’t care if he plays with his back to the audience or gives us multiple fingers.
Not me. If an artist can’t be at least civil to the audience or worse, is outright hostile towards the audience, I’ll probably stay home the next time and listen to the albums. Because for me, it’s mainly about the music, but not just about the music. It’s also about community. And if I feel disrespected by the artist, he/she won’t get my money the next time.
Nadia Lockheart
May 9, 2016 @ 5:31 pm
That is much the same reason why I’ve always respected Adam Duritz of the Counting Crows growing up, even though many would dismiss him as a drama king because of how emotionally intense he can be during certain concerts depending on his mood that given day.
Much like Duritz is diagnosed with a disassociative disorder, which obviously directly impacts his psyche and how he communicates both within and outside of his songwriting, Simpson and countless others all have their own unique expressions and dispositions.
I personally can’t connect with some of the more acerbic remarks made on stage, but that’s more a reflection of my own personality as opposed to an indictment of his.
You got Steved
May 10, 2016 @ 5:34 am
He is in no way shape or form a genius.
Jordan Kirk
May 11, 2016 @ 6:11 am
Love Dailey and Vincent! Wish I could see them live.
seak05
May 9, 2016 @ 10:17 am
Random questions (not sure where to put them) a) speaking of new trends in country music: does every major label release now need a duet with a popstar? (Elle King, Pitbull being two examples off of Dierks and Keith) b) speaking of duets: are you going to do a review of the Blake/Gwen collaboration?
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 10:53 am
I might. I have to hear it first.
TeddyRay
May 9, 2016 @ 10:42 am
somebody is upset that sturgill aint making honky tonk records no more. I aint. good on him. more horns, add synths too. hell, add a goddamn harp for all I care. long as he is doing what he wants.
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 11:01 am
Somebody didn’t read the review.
Saying that anyone that is concerned about Sturgill Simpson’s attitude has to be sour grapes because of the presence of horns, etc. is such an incredible reduction and misunderstanding of what is at the heart of this concern about Sturgill’s direction. That is why there is conflict between Sturgill and certain elements of his fan base. Sturgill himself is boiling it all down to “Kiss my ass if you don’t like horns” when the issues are much deeper than that.
seak05
May 9, 2016 @ 11:59 am
I liked Sturgill’s record, it’s not country. It doesn’t bother me that it’s not country (I mean I’d be happy if it was, but I like good music of all genres). It seems to bother him though that it’s not country? Like he can’t enjoy what he’s currently doing….
Stringbuzz
May 9, 2016 @ 12:00 pm
Personally I think a lot of people are acting like the pissed off ex-girlfriend that someone is moving on to what they feel are better things.
People act like he owes you something. He really doesn’t.
You can either like what he is doing, or not like it.
But because he may have moved on from what he was previously doing (A sound more in line with what you traditionalists/purist hope to get), people are acting like their f’in feelings are hurt and he should be more in line with your wishes!
F’ that.
But we were there from the beginning and this isn’t what we originally liked about him.
F’that too.
It is still part of who he is and what he has done.
Artists (all forms of art) need to move on and explore.
The guy can not win with everyone.
I think it is great he tells the freaking establishment to F off.
I don’t even mind him calling jokers out in the audience, that frankly annoys me too when I am at a show.
I like the bravado.
Tell the ACMs and CMAs to F off too. What have they, or will they do for him? Why should he build bridges with that crap? They haven’t tried to build any bridges to him or any of the other real f’in country artists putting it on the line.
Make idiots of themselves the way they have trying to deal with Stapleton being popular. F that too.
I can understand where Sturgill is coming from.
“Chris Stapleton had shattered the glass ceilings for him.”
That is a f’in laughable statement. He owes Stapleton nothing.
He was on his way before Stapleton and personally, I believe he will be here long after.
Nothing against Stapleton, but he has one album, let’s see where he goes from here.
I am sure everyone will bitch about that too.
Everyone doesn’t need to be a superstar.
I think Sturgill be happy with enough success to make the music he wants and take care of his family.
I don’t think he will have trouble doing that.
If I don’t like the next album, or the direction he wants to go, I ain’t gonna cry about it, it’s his music and career choices.
I’ll move on to something better.
Coop
May 9, 2016 @ 12:09 pm
It’s completely alright to curse on the internetz. No need to “beat around the bush”.
Jim Bob
May 9, 2016 @ 1:45 pm
Fucking A, man!
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 3:10 pm
“Personally I think a lot of people are acting like the pissed off ex-girlfriend that someone is moving on to what they feel are better things … (A sound more in line with what you traditionalists/purist hope to get)”
See, this is the exact incorrect attitude that is creating conflict where there doesn’t need to be any. You are completely missing the problem many people have with what is going on with Sturgill at the moment. And most of them are not “purists/traditionalists.” I get labeled that all the time, and it couldn’t be further from the truth. It’s a misnomer, just like Sturgill thinking you can boil down why people are pissed of to the fact that he has horns in his band.
The reason I started Saving Country Music was because I felt there were many people out there disgruntled about the direction of country music, and they needed a place to voice their concern. There are a lot of people concerned about Sturgill’s direction, and once again, nobody is listening. They’re being lampooned as “hayseeds” and “purists/ traditionalists” when in reality they’re just average Joe country fans who wish he hadn’t gone in this new direction. But they understand and respect Sturgill, so they’re willing to hang with him. But when he starts insulting them from stage, and doing things to purposefully piss them off because he sees no value in their opinion or presence in his fan base, it’s an entirely new issue.
The reason I raised this issue is not because I’m pissed off at Sturgill or angry at his new direction. The reason I did it was to attempt to share some insight into how many people are feeling. If folks want to laugh it off as crybaby bullshit from a purist asshole, fair enough. But it was offered constructively.
“He owes Stapleton nothing.”
Who said he did?
Jt
May 9, 2016 @ 7:56 pm
Trigger, I think you are making it more complicated than it really is. People for months have been whining and complaining about Sturgill leaving his roots. ‘Abandoning his roots and fans’. Bunch of bullshit. And you are trying to excuse these so called Country/Nashville fans that their concern is coming from a ‘good place’. You make no sense or you are taking out of both sides of your mouth. Which is it. Mainstream Nashville and fans who’ve tried to pigeonhole Sturgill have done nothing for him. I’d tell Sturgill to flip off those AssHats nightly. Sturgill is straight up Texas Music Scene BadAss ornery right now. Either hang on for a wild ride or go buy tickets to your nearest Abba/Rascall Flats concert.
Cue the steel guitar and the goddamn horn section and let’s blow the roof off this Mutha!
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 8:46 pm
If you think that the people concerned about Sturgill’s direction are, and I quote, “Mainstream Nashville and fans who’ve tried to pigeonhole Sturgill”, or that Sturgill Simpson has ANYTHING to do with the “Texas Music Scene,” and that the people who want him to stay MORE country than he is at the moment need to get tickets to the “nearest Abba/Rascall Flats concert,” then you my friend have absolutely, positively, certifiably no clue what you’re talking about.
Stringbuzz
May 10, 2016 @ 7:26 am
“You are completely missing the problem many people have with what is going on with Sturgill at the moment. ”
I guess I am missing the problem.
The guy just put out a kick ass album, poured his heart and soul into it, the album he wanted to make and he get’s shyt for it..
People don’t like it fine.
But all this crap about him abandoning his fans, and what is wrong with him, and this is what we wanted, is ridiculous.
Your disappointed, I get it.. He’s not making albums to live up to you’re expectations, but his.
That’s what real artists I can respect do.
no wonder the guy is pissed off.
Saying Chris Stapleton shattered the glass ceiling for him does come across as you insinuating Sturgill owes him something, or shouldn’t give the FU to ACM or CMAs because Stapleton is part of that.
If anything Stapleton got the balls to put out his album after hearing Metamodern..
The only organization that has embraced Sturgil as with Isbell, is the Americana.
BwareDWare94
May 9, 2016 @ 6:56 pm
The idea that an artist owes nothing to the people that have given him/her/them their livelihood has always bothered me.
The idea bothers me because it’s bullshit. Now, this doesn’t really apply to Sturgill because he made a phenomenal record, regardless of how drastically different it is from his prior releases.
My point is this–artists absolutely owe their fans one thing–quality art. If an artist ventures into the mainstream by watering down their sound, that is a problem, and they’ve failed to give their fans what they owe them, but like I said, that doesn’t apply to Sturgill with this release because it’s 9 great to incredible songs.
Applejack
May 9, 2016 @ 1:43 pm
Dang. I haven’t seen Sturgill on his current tour, but based on this, it sounds to me like he’s taking on a confrontational attitude because he’s pre-emptively anticipating some kind of harsh, negative reaction to his new musical style, as if he’s Bob Dylan in 1966 playing loud electric music over the boos and jeers of the audience. But, you know, it’s not as if people are booing Sturgill. As far as I can tell, the majority reaction to his new album has been positive. The sales were good, his Facebook page is flooded with glowing comments and posts, and folks are apparently still showing up to his gigs eager to listen. And while I do think there’s a certain segment of his audience being overly critical of his new direction, it’s not like it would be that hard to ignore them. I mean, there might be a few people talking crap on Twitter or whatever, but I’m not sure Sturgill actually uses his own Twitter account anyway.
Also, if Sturgill was asked (or “begged”) to make an appearance at the CMAs or ACMs, his response would be to flip them the bird? Geez, that sucks. I think it’d be awesome to see Sturgill on the CMAs, for the same reason I think was cool that he got invited to go on tour with Zac Brown Band or that Jason Isbell recently got asked to play the at the big Country Music Hall of Fame benefit alongside Keith Urban or whatever. And if the CMAs, for instance, were to invite Sturgill to do his own thing on stage as opposed to forcing him into some kind of cheesy collaboration or whatever, why not do it? Of course, it’s entirely possible Sturgill was just joking around with that comment, or talking shit to stir up the audience, ha ha. Otherwise, I’ll just say that I think there’s a difference between being an independent artist and burning bridges.
Rita
May 9, 2016 @ 2:02 pm
From a non-corporate radio station view point…we get TONS of phone/online requests for Sturgill’s music…which we play and have played for 4 years, but it isn’t the hipsters requesting his music…trust me. It is the so called “hayseeds” wanting to hear it.
Applejack
May 9, 2016 @ 2:02 pm
By the way, I was one of those who was initially skeptical about Sturgill recording an entire album with horns, and I was wrong, and I may well be wrong again, but…
…. I really hope Sturgill doesn’t record a reggae album next. Honestly, I don’t think even he could pull that off.
Oh well. Jah’s will be done.
Andrew
May 9, 2016 @ 2:08 pm
I’m just really curious to see what Sturgill’s career will look like in 30 years, and how he’ll be remembered.
Dennis
May 9, 2016 @ 2:52 pm
Gonna see him in June. Saw him in September and it was a great show. If this show sucks I’ll just leave and find a jukebox, it’s that easy.
D. Wayne
May 9, 2016 @ 3:24 pm
Sturgill Simpson served as an enlisted man in the US Navy. They don’t blow kisses and hug easily. This isn’t a Belmont U grad in music. He sounds a little ornery and has attitude. Good ! We need more real people in the music business, why ? They have more soul and you feel it when you hear the music.
Brad
May 9, 2016 @ 4:45 pm
I saw Sturgill play in Dallas on Saturday night, and I thought his mood was rather curious. Yes, he did make that remark about the CMAs (mostly, it seemed, just to fire up the audience), but I couldn’t help but notice how PLAYFUL he seemed.
Other than his irritation at Dallas’ notoriously sedate concertgoers, he was in good spirits and downright chatty. In fact, near the end of the show he remarked that that was probably the most he’d ever spoken on stage. He paused a couple times to check out the enormity of the crowd, and I was close enough to see him interact with the other band members with a sly smile and a bit of a twinkle in his eye. During “Voices,” he even sang a couple lines of Randy Travis’ “Digging Up Bones” just for kicks.
Overall, he seemed like he was having fun and was genuinely amazed at how big the audience had gotten in less than 2 years. And while the jamming toward the end was a little indulgent, it felt more like he was trying to jumpstart his bands creative impulses at the beginning of the tour rather than wait to let it happen over time. But it was a great show, and at this point I’ll follow him anywhere.
KrysS
May 9, 2016 @ 4:54 pm
I’ve lurked here for a few years now but never commented, just wanted to jump in… I’m going to his show tomorrow night in Houston (my first time to see him live). I’m looking forward to it, but now definitely very curious as to how the show will go.
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 5:30 pm
There is no reason anyone should be apprehensive about seeing Sturgill Simpson live. As I said in this review, I expect the majority of attendees to his show will have a great time, and I walked away from my experience with a more positive than negative outlook.
KrysS
May 9, 2016 @ 7:58 pm
I wouldn’t say I’m apprehensive, really. It’s more like… Eager anticipation. I have no doubt the show will be amazing. We weren’t able to make it the last couple of times he played here, so I’ve been looking forward to this for quite a while.
Nadia Lockheart
May 9, 2016 @ 5:21 pm
The way you described the latter portion of this show vaguely reminds me of a lot of eye-browing reviews Billy Corgan received following the time he decided to resume “The Smashing Pumpkins” beginning with “Zeitgeist”, on through some of the “Teargarden by Kaleidyscope” era.
During that time, Corgan got a lot of bad press for much the same reason: his shows were more inundated with piss and vinegar than crowd-pleasing. Plenty of those shows, too, were bogged down by pretentiously long and aimless instrumentals……………….and I also recall one time he closed a show with a song where he and his band members at the time played a cover song entirely with kazoos: which struck many fans as a “F*** You!” to them.
*
I still absolutely can’t wait to see Sturgill Simpson live someday soon, and really don’t need any specific reason to. His talent speaks for itself.
But I’m nonetheless greatly worried that he is falling prey to the similar trappings of insecurity as an artist much like Billy Corgan and others. Hopefully he weaves past this phase and feels more of a natural confidence seeing the bigger picture.
the pistolero
May 9, 2016 @ 5:38 pm
Well, that’s…special. What’s next, Sturgill telling us he “(doesn’t) like fucking country music” and that he “only played it as an irony”? Maybe a cover of Taylor Swift’s Red in the style of Iron Maiden? (Come to think of it, that might be kinda cool for at least a couple of listens…)
I get that he’s pissed, but shitting all over the audience that got him to where he is just isn’t cool. We’re not all a bunch of hipster douchebags or closed-minded purists.
Sara
May 9, 2016 @ 6:13 pm
“some of the people who are at the receiving end of his pointed words are the very same people who helped him ascend to his current musical pulpit.”
Yes. Yes. And yes again. To me it seems he want to be embraced by “country music” as it existed many years ago, but not as it exists today. That’s fine, but what’s the alternative? He found it, but doesn’t want it either. What exactly does he want? I don’t think he will ever be content and people will get tired of him. To Sturgill I say, keep making the music that is true to you and be glad it moves people.
Jim Bob
May 10, 2016 @ 5:04 am
You’re right, I don’t think he’ll ever be content. Except that’s a good thing. He 100% strikes me as the kind of guy who’d simply walk away from it all the moment he was content with it.
Big Cat
May 9, 2016 @ 6:38 pm
I’m hearing the shows were very good from folks I trust. As stated above to say he hasn’t had an angry chip for years is just wrong. I’ve seen him cuss people out and bash monitors in shows over bad sound. The guy is not stable and never has been but that’s what makes him so fucking interesting.
I don’t want to watch 10 Chris Stapeltons at the CMA’s. I’ll shoot two middle fingers at that shit too. Music needs more unquie personalities and Sturgill is sure nuff one
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 9:00 pm
Big Cat,
I respectfully disagree with your take on Sturgill’s anger. Perhaps you saw a show in previous years where he lost his shit, and so you have a different perspective on this. But having been closely following Sturgill’s career for many years, having seen him during many different eras and in many different venues, and also referencing other professional reviews from Austin and Dallas, and having been at a show on this current tour, I can assure you the anger and energy has taken a dramatic step up. Don’t take my word for it. Go read some other reviews from Austin and Dallas. In fact Sturgill even said at the Dallas show that he was talking more during a show than he ever has before. During the High Top and Metamodern era, people were complaining he was too demure. Go read my previous live reviews and album reviews for Sturgill. I mentioned Sturgill’s anger and energy specifically.
Also, I am in no way saying this is a bad thing. It think it’s great. I think Sturgill is at his best when he’s angry. But I also think he’s pointing his anger at some of the wrong people. Frankly, I think he’s pissed because certain people had greater expectations for his record than what it delivered, and now he’s taking it out on folks that have nothing to do with it.
Big Cat
May 10, 2016 @ 4:19 am
Ok I’m not going to argue with a professional. Not sure exact number but I’ve seen him 12-15 times. Out of those I’ve seen a handful of situations that I’ve never seen from another live musician. He complains about sound A LOT. He complains about/at certain types of fans a lot (just like your cell phone story I saw him bitch people out for talking during a Roy cover last year). But I trust you in your longer professional observation. I have also not seen him on this tour but will.
I very much agree on the origin of the latest anger.
Good job
Bear
May 9, 2016 @ 7:59 pm
He will be on WTF podcast Thurs. Marc Marin should be able to the bottom of the anger a little.
Parth Venkat
May 9, 2016 @ 8:41 pm
anyone go to both shows? I went Thursday and didn’t feel that super angry vibe … had a blast though I his voice wasn’t his best due to the evil that is Austin allergies
Trigger
May 9, 2016 @ 8:52 pm
Kevin Curtain, writing for the Austin Chronicle (which I also referenced and linked to above), made specific reference to Sturgill’s anger during the set on Thursday.
http://www.austinchronicle.com/daily/music/2016-05-06/sturgill-simpson-sink-or-swim/
” Horns detailed the classic material, most notably on “A Little Light,” in which they imitated a Telecaster twang and then went off on a three-part solo that Simpson dedicated “to the haters.”
“They tell me I fucked up: There aren’t no horns in country music,” offered the increasingly riled-up Simpson. “I say tell Merle Haggard. That’s where I stole it!”
My opinion on Simpson’s anger is not just from my observance, and not just from Friday night. It was also specifically referenced by the three professional reviews that came out of the Dallas show. We all have varying perspectives based on our experiences. But the idea that Sturgill has unleashed his anger on his current tour is being pretty universally-recognized by the folks paid to give their observations. It was by far my biggest takeaway Friday night.
Josh K
May 9, 2016 @ 10:22 pm
I’ll venture a tentative theory – Sturgill seems to be of a personality type that is very introspective and philosophizing. (I’m guessing enneagram 5 with a 4 wing.) When unhealthy, I bet he can become a little detached from reality, and dark. Combine this with with growing up wage class rural Appalachian. (I can identify with these elements, being of a similar age, from not to far away from his hometown, and probably sharing many personality traits.) Rural Appalachian folks have been collectively shat upon for so long that many of us unfortunately can become self-sabotaging and we often have real struggles with accepting success gracefully.
Trigger I agree that anger can be a potent fuel for effective musical expression. But there are types of anger and there are ways to direct it creatively. Reading your review makes me think that Sturgill was just mad and kind of sabotaging himself: “Fuck you, fuck everybody, fuck me…” Maybe he has a hard time with the pressure of becoming so popular so fast and is lost in some navel gazing, existential ennui, and reacting from self-recrimination. It’s a shame if true but I can identify with that.
Tom
May 10, 2016 @ 12:23 am
It also doesn’t make much sense because the people who are pissed about the horns probably aren’t many of the ones buying tickets knowing they’re going to hear horns. The setlist is also.. curious. The last tour you’d usually get 4-5 bluegrass songs, and he killed it on all of them at the show I saw and on plenty of videos, so cutting to ~0 is odd. Maybe it’s just not having a good plan for the horns for those songs, but I wonder if it’s an intentional FU to people wanting to hear his older sounds.
Mike W.
May 10, 2016 @ 6:17 am
Great review, honestly Simpson’s new album has grown on me some the more I listen to it. When it initially came out, I think I gave it something like 6/10, but digging deeper into some of the songs I have to say it has grown on me quite a bit.
As for Simpson’s anger, it probably comes from a variety of places. Let’s face it, Simpson is a personality unique to Country music. The guy pretty much legitimately self-made his career ascension (with the help obviously of lots of good to great review and publicity from sites such as this one) and maybe that gives him a bit of a chip on his shoulder. I don’t say this to slap anyone in the face, but Simpson is routinely tossed in with Jason Isbell and Chris Stapleton as the trio of Country music “saviors”. Well, let’s face it, Stapleton has a shit-ton of Music Row friends and allies from his time as a songwriter for guys like Bryan, Strait, etc. etc. Isbell got his start and a big career bump from being a part of the Drive-By Truckers when they were (arguably) at their peak as a band commercially and creatively. Maybe the fact that Simpson didn’t earn/get handed/whatever similar breaks kind of pisses him off deep down inside. And now he is getting tossed in with those guys.
Plus, I would argue that Simpson is a pretty deep, intelligent thinker. With that, he also seems highly opinionated when you get him rolling. Maybe he is tired of seeing so many millennials showing up at his shows, staring at their phones the entire show or posting whatever to social media instead of taking in the show and fully enjoying it. I know Louis CK has gone on a number of public rants of late of the lack of attention span and narcissism tied to our collective addiction to the smart phone. Wouldn’t surprise me if Simpson, as a guy probably older than large tracts of his audiences, is more than a little dismayed at this social phenomena.
Jack Williams
May 10, 2016 @ 7:30 am
Lots of good stuff there. With respect to Jason Isbell and DBT, I’d say it was a symbiotic relationship and he was integral part of their rise. He joined them just after Southern Rock Opera was starting to get some traction. The first time I laid eyes on him was a DBT show in summer 2002 at Iota in Arlington, VA. It’s a small room with maybe a 200 person capacity. Now, they’ll play two nights at the 9:30 Cub, which is the big DC rock club. He helped put them over the top with his songwriting on Decoration Day and The Dirty South, which I think are their two best, with TDS at #1. Plus, he was guitar player #1 during his time with them.
Mike W.
May 10, 2016 @ 9:53 am
That’s fair, you are right that Isbell played a big role in pushing DBT to that “next level”. As awesome as Hood and Cooley are, ” Outfit” is likely going to go down as their most recognizable song ever.
Charlie
May 10, 2016 @ 6:42 am
Fear of success manifests itself in funny ways. Lashing out at the very people who support you, setting up roadblocks, wandering off course.
You’ll never hear him brag about which song bought him what house.
Rick
May 10, 2016 @ 1:21 pm
Nope you wont…
Mostly because he still lives in the same Nashville townhouse he lived in before he blew up and he still drives an old beat up Ford Bronco.
The dude is certainly not in it for the fame & money I’ll give him that.
Wicket
May 10, 2016 @ 6:45 am
You miss Sturgill playing country as much as I miss you reviewing music. This is the 3rd Sturgill “review” that seems more like an unsolicited therapy session than a show analysis. And let’s be honest, Sturgill is doing pretty well right now, so why have you got him on the ropes here? Even the commentors that went to the show are saying he was being more sanguine & playful than angry. I don’t see the anger mentioned in the other reviews either, even in the quotes you pulled. Maybe growing pains for the show, but that’s expected, right?
Maybe it’s my personal preference, but I’m more interested in how the show sounds rather than how you think Sturgill thinks and feels. It’s weird, presumptive & tabloidish. Was the show good? Did it sound good? Since your only take away is that he’s angry (a very specific anger direct towards people like you), reading this review I would think he just got up there split the fans into groups & yelled at the ones he was angry with, or even better sent a direct coded message that only they would understand. I don’t buy it. I guess I’ll have to read the reviews written by people who don’t insert their personal feelings into the evening. And why only with Sturgill? Your other reviews seem to still be reviews. I like this site, but am weirded out by all the feelings. Back to the basics please.
Trigger
May 10, 2016 @ 10:03 am
Wicket,
First off, I talked about the show, I talked about the lineup, I talked about the songs, I talked about the various segments where he played the album in its entirety, then played rock stuff, then played country stuff, then played funk/soul stuff. The reason I mentioned his anger is because it’s your job when you review someone to find the biggest takeaway and then expound on it. That’s called narrative. There’s nothing tabloid about it.
And what you, and many other folks are missing is that I said his anger was an ASSET to his music.
QUOTE:
“The unleashing of Sturgill Simpson’s anger is the strongest takeaway from what you can expect from his current live show. He’s moves around the stage like a lion circling his prey. He points to the crowd to finish lines of songs. He calls out members of the crowd or things he doesn’t like, be damned the repercussions, or what may end up on YouTube or in the press the next day. And he is a much more magnetic and engaging performer for it.“
Also, the idea that none of these other reviews are elucidating on Sturgill’s anger is insane. It was basically the basis for the reviews coming out of the Dallas show. Another one was posted yesterday by The Dallas Observer. Here’s the title: “Sturgill Simpson Flipped the Bird to the Country Establishment at The Bomb Factory”
http://www.dallasobserver.com/music/sturgill-simpson-flipped-the-bird-to-the-country-establishment-at-the-bomb-factory-8283697
So you’re telling me there’s no anger in that?
Cornball, hayseed bullshit,” Simpson said, insisting that while his new album — A Sailor’s Guide to the Universe, released in April — debuted at No. 1 on the country charts, he doesn’t consider himself a part of the genre. “There’s gonna be a time when they need me, and this is what I’m going to say.” From there, he let his two extended middle fingers — a hearty fuck you to the country music establishment — do all the talking.”
Are you still not seeing the anger?
There’s these Sturgill fans who are characterizing folks who wished he’d made a country record as jilted ex-lovers. But all the anger I’m seeing is coming from Sturgill and his defenders.
And by the way, this was a positive review. Because overall, I enjoyed the show.
Wicket
May 10, 2016 @ 11:19 am
Tabloid journalism is promoting stories based on speculation rather than fact. He flipped off the industry & called the CMA’s corny (which they are egregiously so), and you for whatever reason took it personally & reported that Sturgill is angry at his fans. I think he even said that he’d rather be playing for his fans than at some awards show….but that’s neither here nor there. You can say he played angrily, but when you start telling people why he’s angry without being him, you are speculating. What happens then is people presume you are reporting fact and walk away thinking he lashed out at his fans on stage because he’s angry at them. That’s not very responsible reporting in my opinion. I’d rather read a review where they told me what happened & I could judge for myself. Or if you plan on editorializing about Sturgill or whoever and why you think they do things, just call it that and not a review.
Trigger
May 10, 2016 @ 11:55 am
Look Wicket, I don;t really want to argue with you because I don’t really think our opinions are that far off. I like Sturgill’s latest record. I have resolved myself with the lesser country direction of his music. I am happy to see the return of Sturgill’s energy on stage. But I had a few concerns about how he is using that energy, that is all. Facts are fact, and opinion is not tabloid, it’s based on someone’s perspective. Tabloid would be, “Sturgill Simpson has unresolved anger issues because of something happening in his personal life,” and I didn’t go there.
“What happens then is people presume you are reporting fact and walk away thinking he lashed out at his fans on stage because he’s angry at them.”
Sturgill said from the stage Friday night, and I quote, ““The next record is gonna be reggae. And it will be made with a Roland TR-8 drum machine and a bunch of synthesizers just to piss people off!”
That sure sounds like he’s trying to piss people off. Of course he’s being sarcastic.
I did plenty of describing what happened at the show, and one of the things that happened was he emitted a lot of anger from him we haven’t seen in previous years. Which is generally a good thing. I just wish he would channel that anger in a different direction.
Wicket
May 10, 2016 @ 11:30 am
And I’ve actually seen Sturgill shows when he had this attitude like others who have commented. They were mostly Sunday Valley shows many years ago, and I would say the bravado seemed to be the exact opposite of anger. Throwing out fbombs & calling out fans he seemed to be happier than a pig in shit.
Trigger
May 10, 2016 @ 11:48 am
Yes, exactly. Witnessing Sturgill’s energy during the Sunday Valley era, then seeing it disappear to an extent in recent years, and then seeing it reappear on this current tour is why I remarked on it. I saw this as a sea change in Sturgill’s apprach, and felt like it was important to expound on.
SteveG
May 10, 2016 @ 7:05 am
Perhaps Sturgill feels that in order to be a musical iconoclast ala Bob Dylan, he has to gin up controversy and position himself in the crosshairs of certain longtime fans or musical establishment. Where is all this coming from? Is he really receiving much backlash from his use of horns? His album went number 1, it has accumulated massive critical acclaim, including an insanely high score on Metacritic. By most accounts, he’s being showered upon with praise and commercial success. Why does he feel the need to act like he’s being persecuted for doing what he wants? He sounds awfully petulant here.
Trigger
May 10, 2016 @ 10:08 am
Exactly Steve G. I think there’s a few closed-minded rednecks who immediately hated Sturgill’s last record because it had horns. But I think the MAJORITY of fans are just regular Joe country fans, many of which are probably smart folks who listen to artists like Sturgill instead of mainstream radio, who simply wished he had made another country record, and hope he will sometime in the future. But they’re getting slandered and attacked for this opinion.
I really like Sturgill’s new album. I gave it a very positive review. 8 out of 10. And even I’m getting attacked for hating Sturgill’s new direction.
SteveG
May 10, 2016 @ 7:20 am
Oh, and one more thing. There are millions of people in this country who are working their fingers to the bone in dirty or backbreaking jobs just trying to get by and provide for their families, and they’re barely hanging on paycheck to paycheck. I have no sympathy for a man who is lauded by critics and is thriving in commercial acclaim for doing what he wants, and his only negative repercussions are being criticized by a select few for the way he does what he wants. He can stomp his foot and yell and cuss and act like an iconoclast all he wants. Sorry, but I’m all out of fucks to give.
Wicket
May 10, 2016 @ 7:42 am
I don’t think it was Sturgill actually lashing out at his fans, none of the other reviews said that. I think this “review” is all about the person writing it. You may want to hold off on dismissing Sturgill as a petulant asshole until you see a show. Or fuck it, go on & give up on him. Ain’t nobody got time for this shit.
SteveG
May 10, 2016 @ 9:22 am
I gotcha. I was mainly directing my comment at some of the comments in this thread where people were seemingly sympathizing with him and his frustration. I personally don’t care if he’s frustrated or not. It doesn’t bother me. I will be a fan of his music regardless, as I have been since Sunday Valley. I’m just saying that I’m indifferent about it all, and I certainly don’t feel pity, because he’s “living the dream.”
Mark
May 10, 2016 @ 7:38 am
I can see a person having some anger, growing up in a coalfield town in Kentucky. There’s much to be angry about in that part of America.
There are a few youtube live performance videos of the current band doing tunes from the latest album.
And thanks for the thoughtful review.
Whiskey Pete
May 10, 2016 @ 11:31 am
Kinda want to punch Sturgill Simpson in the face. Next album from the Sturge will be reggae and jungle themed. Complete with sounds from grey parrots, chimpanzees, leopards, and other critters that roam the jungle. Oh and of course the fucking horns.
Swannanoa
May 10, 2016 @ 5:39 pm
I hate to even be the guy that says this but it needs to be said. If I am at a show that’s not the only thing going on in my life, if I get a text or whatever I’m gonna respond. Artists disregarding the people that paid good money too see them is the worst. He can say whatever he wants about Nashville or the CMA’s but should be careful how he references his fans.
Old Sul Hoss
May 10, 2016 @ 9:30 pm
Just saw Sturgill in Houston. One of the best concerts I’ve been to in a long time. Hell of a show.
Stringbuzz
May 11, 2016 @ 7:19 am
How angry was he? LOL
Old Sul Hoss
May 11, 2016 @ 11:10 am
He wasn’t angry at all. Was enjoyable all around. He actually did a pretty great job of working in the horns into his songs. Was pretty impressed overall.
KrysS
May 11, 2016 @ 9:06 am
Hell yes. The show was absolutely incredible. I was lucky enough to be right up front, and was blown away. I’ll definitely see him again next time he comes to Houston.
He didn’t talk much between songs, but I didn’t get the angry vibe at all.
Trigger
May 11, 2016 @ 2:14 pm
From reading the Houston review, it sounds like the set was quite different from Austin and Dallas, but still very well-received. He didn’t play “Sailors Guide” in its entirety at the start, and instead played “Metamodern” in its entirety in the center of the show. Also haven’t seen anything about anything he said on stage at all like KrysS says. Will be interesting to see how the set list develops as the tour goes on.
RD
May 11, 2016 @ 9:01 am
Energy Schmenergy. Write a good song. Play the shit out of your instruments. I don’t care if you do it from a hospital bed. Most of the time, performers rely on energy for the same reason they rely on costumes or seizure-inducing light shows: The songs suck and the music sucks.