No I Said, What Kind of Bird, Are YOU?
In the 2012 Wes Anderson film Moonrise Kingdom, an adventurous 12-year-old Khaki Scout named Sam gets bored during a stage production of Noah’s Ark, and decides to go exploring the bowels of the building where the play is being held. It is backstage where he happens upon a group of six girls dressed as birds getting ready to take the stage. As the girls apply the final touches to their makeup in the mirror, Sam clears his throat to get the girls’ attention.
“What kind of bird are you?” he asks, singling out one of the girls dressed in black.
As one of the other girls begins to rattle off the respective bird species that each girl is supposed to be, Sam interrupts her. “No I said, what kind of bird, are you?” pointing at who would be Sam’s love interest for the rest of the film—a 12-year-old girl named Suzy.
The scene is a illustration, and a lesson on both romance, and how women, especially younger women and girls, are often grouped together almost as a habit, where their singular characteristics are many times seen as nothing more as a slight variance from the whole or menu items to choose from as opposed to seeing these women as completely independent and unique individuals. Or as the character Jay of Jay and Silent Bob fame in the much less genteel film by Kevin Smith called Chasing Amy puts it, “There’s just one bitch in the world, one bitch with many faces.”
In Moonrise Kingdom, Sam flatters Suzy by making her feel special; by making her feel singular. Right now the big question on the minds of many country music journalists, label heads, publicists, and managers is, how do we get the proper attention for female artists who seem to be setting the pace for quality with their music, but are institutionally ignored by many fans, country radio, and other large swaths of the entertainment industry?
One effort has been to institutionalize media coverage of these artists through programs like CMT’s Next Women of Country, the Song Suffragettes, and other such efforts. In Billboard’s recent Nashville issue, there was a big roundtable discussion with some of the country music’s most important, but ultimately under-appreciated female stars of today, specifically Cam, Margo Price, Kacey Musgraves, Mickey Guyton, Aubrie Sellers, and Maren Morris.
Some excellent insight is garnered, and points are put across in the roundtable conducted by well-respected country journalist Jewly Hight, just as often is the case with these stories and events that try to shine a bigger light on female country stars by combining them together. The Billboard roundtable was accompanied by an alluring photo shoot, with the six artists posing together, just as you often see at promotional events for female artists where six or seven songwriters or performers are put all in a row on stools with acoustic guitars and asked to perform.
Any effort to help promote female artists in the current environment, or to raise the issues facing them is a worthy one. Despite now being over a year removed from Tomatogate and some symbolic victories, female artists are still struggling mightily. But you don’t just have to look at it from a gender perspective. According to critics, new albums from Brandy Clark and Lori McKenna are a two of the best released so far this year. But commercially, they are struggling, while radio is a pipe dream for them. The effort to instill more support behind females has been a mixed bag so far, unless you’re willing to go pop like Maren Morris and Kelsea Ballerini, but that opportunity has always been out there.
If someone is apt to not pay attention to female artists from the beginning, whether that’s a garden variety country fan or a major label executive, bunching female artists together is probably not going to garner their attention, it’s probably going to turn them off even more, especially if the premise of putting these artists together is an attempt to break through the perceived gender bias. Saving Country Music has made this point before, which should not be taken as non support of CMT’s Next Women of Country, the Song Suffragettes, or anything else. But each time I see these events or articles, there’s something about it that appears almost like we’re standardizing these artists as second-class, or unworthy of them being singled out.
Even though the effort is meant to instill more support behind these female artists, lumping them together in one setting almost speaks to the bias against them as much as anything else, like editors and producers can’t spare the expense to feature these artists one at a time and ask, “No, what kind of bird, are you?” Yet putting six or more of them together, that combines the respective fan bases and Facebook pages of each to garner enough attention to the media item to justify the effort.
As Cam says in Billboard’s roundtable, “But now there’s this excuse sometimes where if something doesn’t go 100% right, perfectly in your career, it’s like, ‘Well, we are trying to break a female.'” It’s almost as if we expect females to fail.
Sometimes we lump male artists together too, but it is usually in smaller groups, and it’s usually meant to call attention to their success, whether that’s Jason Isbell, Sturgill Simpson, and Chris Stapleton, or even Bro-Country artists who get massed together due to their massive commercial success.
Again, there’s nothing wrong with the Billboard’s new roundtable or any of these other efforts. But each time a new one is rolled out, I find myself asking, “No, what kind of bird, are you?”—wondering where the coverage is singling each of these artists out, drawing readers and listeners deeper into each artist’s personal narratives, and going beyond the challenges female artists face to hopefully find some resonance with listeners that can morph into fandom.
This is not about female artists vs. male artists. This is about good music vs. bad music. It just happens to be that more often than not, the good vs. bad divide is drawn down gender lines in mainstream country at the moment. And to save country music, we first have to continue to make a serious effort to push female artists to the forefront in a way that doesn’t immediately turn the country music oligarchs off, but persuades them into paying attention.
Every female artists deserves her moment in the spotlight, the opportunity to be singled out, and have the question asked of her “No, what kind of bird, are you?” Sam the Khaki Scout understood this, and we should too.
Kale
August 9, 2016 @ 11:45 am
I’d like to know what’s so special about the Bro-Country singers. They’re all the same, and they suck. If any type of artist deserves to be lumped together and ignored, it’s them.
Kevin Smith
August 9, 2016 @ 12:20 pm
There is a long history of successful females in country music who hit big time. Reba, Patsy, Dolly,Loretta, Patty Loveless, Martina McBride,Miranda etc.Women have always been part of country music going back to the Carter Family.The latest trends will not last of minimizing female artists. II believe the pendulum will swing the other way eventually.
My point is that country radio is in the worst period it’s ever been. Between bro country and this Sam Hunt pseudo R&B nonsense, women are perhaps being marginalized by current Trashville fads du jour.But I predict it will change, it always does.
Meanwhile, we have so many other ways than country radio to find the female talent. Go out and support live music. There are plenty of female artists waiting to be discovered.
Fuzzy TwoShirts
August 9, 2016 @ 3:05 pm
“to save country music, we first have to continue to make a serious effort to push female artists to the forefront”
what you have just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul
The idea that women are magically making quality music because they are women is delusion and outrageous. The problem is not women versus men, okay?
the sexism criticism that has been flung at Country Music over the past five or six years means that literally any women who says she makes Country Music will get at least token radio play because she’s a women, it’s reverse discrimination at its finest, that’s why Cam and that girl you think smells nice have record deals.
It’s only a coincidence that the women are making quality music, because the quality of the music is not the reason they are on the radio.
I REPEAT: the women on Country Radio are being played only because they are women, and not because of the quality of their music. the music row executives DO NOT CARE about the quality of the music, that’s why they are still shafting Sturgill Simpson and Chris Stapleton.
THEY ARE NOT PLAYING FEMALE ARTISTS BECAUSE OF THE QUALITY OF THEIR ART, THEY ARE DOING IT TO AVOID BEING CALLED SEXIST.
we CANNOT save Country Music just by waving our arms around and demanding that more females will be played, because all we will get is stupid music sung by females.
again: all we will get is stupid music sung by females.
we have to save Country Music, we have to get people, male or female, who play REAL COUNTRY MUSIC, instead of getting sidetracked in a fight for equality that will not improve the quality of the music.
Let’s focus on taking our genre back from Luke Bryan and Scott Borchetta first, okay?
because it doesn’t matter how many women are played on the radio if the music still sucks.
let’s put out the bigger dumpster fire first.
Trigger
August 9, 2016 @ 3:25 pm
Fuzzy, you took one sentence completely out of context to go on your rant about. The two sentences right before the one you yanked were critical to completing the thought:
“This is not about female artists vs. male artists. This is about good music vs. bad music. It just happens to be that more often than not, the good vs. bad divide is drawn down gender lines in mainstream country at the moment.”
Now maybe because my thoughts were “rambling” and “incoherent” (and they were not a “response” to anything in particular), you didn’t pick up on the context. But it appears to me you wanted to twist off on a positioning statement you’ve already made here numerous times, so you selected a piece of text to read autonomously as if it was the entire point of the article.
Fuzzy TwoShirts
August 9, 2016 @ 5:21 pm
maybe in “mainstream” Country Music, and yes, I kind of went a little off the rails, but I think my point is valid, that the thing Country Music needs the most of is honesty, integrity, real emotion, maturity, melody. etc, not just “females, women, she-males”
and as I said, I think the higher quality of the females on Country Radio is not why their getting played, I think it’s more about pushing diversity.
But follow my thoughts here:
lots of male artists are making great Country Music and aren’t getting played, lots of females are making poor Country Music, and are getting played just for diversity’s sake.
So I disagree that the FIRST thing to do is to push female Country artists. I think the first thing to do is push REAL Country artists, male or female, who make quality music, play real music without computers and make quality music.
We have to at least consider the reality that maybe they aren’t being played because of their quality music, but because of a diversity push to make a crumbling system seem more marketable.
and hey, some of them are talented, and are making great music, but what about all the talented people who aren’t on the radio?
more importantly, how about the untalented ones who ARE on the radio?
as much as I’m happy for Maren Morris and Margo Price, the bigger problem is that quality songwriting and musicianship aren’t being rewarded or demanded.
more women won’t fix the stupid problem, we’ll just get stupid music made by women, we’ll get more Kelsea Ballerinis and we’ll get more Kimberly Perrys…
And no, I’m not trying to rant on and on like a discount Donald Trump, I’m just confused by a set of priorities, that in my mind, don’t adequately address the problems facing my genre…
because I don’t feel that it matters if the performers are men or women as long as the performers make good music that I want to listen to.
So no, I don’t just want “more women” in Country Music.
I just want music that I enjoy listening to that isn’t stupid beer and trucks and Sam Kane Brown B.S.
whether it’s made by men OR women.
Trigger
August 9, 2016 @ 7:54 pm
“lots of females are making poor Country Music, and are getting played just for diversity’s sake.”
Not true. The women aren’t getting played at all unless they go pop.
“So I disagree that the FIRST thing to do is to push female Country artists.”
But I never said that. As I went out of my way to explain in the article, it just happens to be that females also represnt a move to quality for country radio if they would only adopt.
I understand what you’re trying to say and I agree with a lot of it, but you’re acting like I’m taking an opposite viewpoint when I went out of my way to clarify that we shouldn’t just push certain music solely because it’s from women.
Donny
August 11, 2016 @ 9:16 am
Fuzzy with the comment of the year. Glad to see someone sticking up for our fellow men.
Trigger
August 11, 2016 @ 9:23 am
Who is attacking them?
Toby in AK
August 9, 2016 @ 3:35 pm
Really tempted to make an off color joke here. I can’t be the only one thinking it.
I’d love to see these women getting more individualized coverage. I’d love to see all of them succeed at doing their own thing, and I think in a way each of them will but it won’t come in the form of radio play. I want to know why has Ashley Monroe, who wasn’t on the panel, not had the kind of attention she deserves? It’s tragic.
Then there is a part of me that says “but, but”. It’s not like the male artists are given much of a chance to be their own bird either. Compared to the women, at least they get a chance to choose which of the cookie cutter shapes they want to fit into. For the women it’s all about sex appeal and powerful voice. I’m not sure this fits the theme of this article but those are my thoughts.
Erik North
August 9, 2016 @ 5:42 pm
It seems to me that the Saladgate Boys (Keith Hill, et. al), beyond the two “sure things” that are Carrie Underwood and Miranda Lambert, seem to be looking for only two other kinds of female artists on the radio, both of which are stereotypical and atrocious. One type is personified as the pseudo-Taylor Swift wanna-be Kelsea Ballerini, with that irritatingly hammy teen twang of hers on “Dibs”. And the other is a worst type: women who try to pander to the idea of being a Bromeister’s truck’s hood ornament, like Jana Kramer, with “Said No One Ever”, and Claire Dunn with “Tuxedo”. Thus a situation that was already bad is just made a lot worse, because that mentality keeps a lot of groundbreaking women out of the loop.
Like so many female artists of the last sixty years who have become superstars (Dolly Parton; Loretta Lynn; Patsy Cline; Linda Ronstadt; Emmylou Harris, etc.), the best female artists of today are the ones that don’t conform to the aforementioned Keith Hill/Scott Borchetta mentality, but who strike out on their own unique paths, taking what they learned from their female forebears and applying that to forge themselves into authentic artists all their own. It isn’t a situation that is unique to country music by any means, but I don’t think there’s any other genre where this kind of sexism is currently this pervasive or this out in the open in terms of the media. I feel really bad for a lot of the womenfolk because they are making far better music than the “Bros”, including Margo Price, whose album MIDWEST FARMER’S DAUGHTER has to rank as one of the best albums by anybody in any gender and any music genre this year because of its “old school” sound, a mix of honky-tonk and country-rock that really works.
The mentality of the Hill/Borchetta cabal suggests that country music listeners are turned off by strong, independent women. To say that I find this inaccurate would be putting it quite mildly.
Corncaster
August 9, 2016 @ 7:14 pm
Let the dead bury their dead.
And no one is going to save anything by virtue of their genitalia.
Get a grip.
Joshua
August 9, 2016 @ 7:40 pm
So in today’s news: the best songwriter ever finally gets some recognition but still no airplay. Meanwhile a bunch of pretty girls with mediocre talent complain about not getting instant superstar status.
I really can’t take Kacey Musgraves seriously anymore. She had a hit, then she made an album called ‘reject material’, phoned in the production and when no one cares she gets all feminist.
Anyway, I’ll keep buying Emmylou, Roseanne, holly williams, lindi ortega, etc because their music is consistently fresh and amazing. It’s almost like they prefer making music to complaining.
Trigger
August 9, 2016 @ 7:49 pm
See, this is why I wince when I see articles like the recent one in Billboard. To many, the girls just come across as whiners.
Joshua
August 9, 2016 @ 8:22 pm
I get that there is a bias problem, but I think there is also a talent problem. Too many female songs have managed to be successful to prove it can be done, just not many manage.
BTW, I just got a new phone, yours was the first website I opened and I got popup ads. You have a problem somewhere.
Jacob Ware
August 9, 2016 @ 8:44 pm
Its actually simple, the ratio of male to female performers is 3 to 1. The ratio of male artists making good music is 4 to 1. The ratio of female artists making good music is 4 to 1. If there are 150 male artists and 50 female artists, 38 male artists are making quality music while only 13 female artists are making quality music. Its simple math, female artists are making crappy music at too high of a rate for their population, drowning out the few that do make good music. So get over it, radio is dying anyway,
Charlie
August 10, 2016 @ 4:27 am
The playing of legitimate female acts on radio would be an indirect indicator of the health of country music–a bellwether species. See a bunch of frogs, then the ecosystem is healthy. Hear Sunny Sweeney on iFart radio, then all is right with the audio world.
Instead we have Kelsea Ballerini. So, like a sugary mutant frog from the candy factory runoff pond.
Craig
August 10, 2016 @ 4:45 am
Nashville uses all manner of statistical analysis and marketing psychology to push whatever flavor they think will be the next big thing. But at the end of the day they’re just making an educated guess. The consumer wants what the consumer wants. We hate bro-country and vanilla R&B around here but a whole lot of people like it and want it, which is why it’s playing on the radio. The consumer is not an easily manipulated moron. Not even the FGL consumer. They know hype when they see it. If they like what’s being hyped, they’ll buy it. If not, they won’t (there are a lot of options these days). Shania Twain RULED country radio for a decade. Were we less patriarchal then? To Nashville, an artist is a sexless product. Either that artist makes money or not. If the consumer indicates that they like the flavor and want more, Nashville will push it until everyone is vomiting in the gutter.
RobertS
August 10, 2016 @ 8:32 am
I just started listening to the free preview of Kelsey Waldon’s new album right now, and I really like what I’ve heard so far. Lots of steel ! Off topic, I can also highly recommend Cody Jinks’ new album, which is also running a free preview.
Frank the Tank
August 10, 2016 @ 5:43 pm
I’ve listened to Kelsey Waldon’s new album and it’s excellent. The steel guitar is very prominent, which is nice to hear.
A.K.A. City
August 10, 2016 @ 8:51 am
As a female, I hate women being regulated into one box- whether a programming slot, article, or being the token woman in an otherwise all-male festival line-up. I agree with the point that Trigger is trying to make- we need to approach each female artist individually as an artist, not as “insert woman performer here.”
I’m not as familiar with the country music industry as I am with other entertainment sectors (namely film and television), but what would help dramatically is not only focus on female performers, but more on the position of women as “gatekeepers,” be it radio programmers, music producers, media relations, or concert organizers. By balancing the ratios in the industry as a whole, the quality of representation will begin to increase.
I have a teenage stepdaughter whom I would love to have better choices and role models presented to her. She loves Brantley Gilbert and Colt Ford. When given the alternative of listening to Kelsea Ballerini, I almost understand her choices. And yes, I try to gently expose other influences like Kacey Musgraves to her, but you know, I’m old and unhip.
I appreciate the coverage and conversation in regards to this subject that this site has started. What can I do as a consumer to help the cause? Share on social media good articles and reviews about female performers (I shared the NPR First Listen of the new Brandy Clark album more than once on Facebook), attend shows, buy merchandise, buy music, like and retweet things. I generally think that the industry will follow the dollar, but that isn’t always the case, as it seems that most of radio still doesn’t know what to do with Chris Stapleton. Any other ideas would be great.
Corncaster
August 10, 2016 @ 9:57 am
Well, if they don’t know what to do with Chris Stapleton, we need more artists with the Chris Stapleton effect to crash a broken system. Just continue to tell your daughter to listen for quality, male or female, doesn’t matter. Listen for what’s truer, and deeper. My daughter nearly wept on the bus when she heard Miranda Lambert’s “The House That Built Me.” She’s ten years old.
You know what disgusts me? The apparent fact that Nashville, Inc. (but not only Nashville, Inc.) evidently thinks my daughter is a brainless, illiterate twit who only cares about shaking her butt and running after tattooed douche-bags with boy trucks, deadbeat virtues, and no professional prospects. That’s what sticks in my craw. My daughter is *worlds* better than that. And she’s also better, and less bitter, than the “grrl power” type music that tells her lies from the opposite side of the ideological coin.
“Bro Country” has an opposite called “Grrl Country.” Neither effort will get so much as a nickel from me.
Trigger
August 10, 2016 @ 10:16 am
Good point about the positions of influence also needing to be represented by women. That is another push happening in country music. There are basically no female producers in mainstream country right now. There are a decent amount of executive positions filled by women, specifically at the CMA, which is one of country’s biggest governing bodies, and CMT. But radio is still a good ol’ boys club. Again, it’s not just about men and women. We have to focus on the music first.
Erik North
August 10, 2016 @ 7:23 pm
I totally agree that a resuscitation of country music has to be by both the men and the women, and in a fairly sizeable amount of quality AND quantity, to make a difference.
But while people may want more artists like Chris Stapleton to appear on the scene to counteract the Bromeisters, I think it’s important to remember that not everyone is necessarily going to do it EXACTLY his way, nor should they. Similarly, with the womenfolk, they are each going to take their own individual approaches, hopefully rooted in the traditional spirit of country music, but also with the knowledge that traditionalism and progressive values can co-exist side by side, as Linda and Emmylou both demonstrated on their many great recordings.
As much as people may decry the idea of “pop country”, the bottom line is that pop and rock HAVE influenced country music in some form or another since the first explosion of rock and roll sixty years ago; it’s something that’s unavoidable. The problem these days is how to integrate those influences in a way that doesn’t destroy the country genre’s integrity. It’s been done well in the past, but the current trend to incorporate rap and hip-hop influences (hence the “Bro” trend, “hick-hop”, “Metro Bro”, etc.) has been nothing short of an artistic holocaust genre in our present context. Just from my perspective, the women, and I include Margo Price, Lindi Ortega, Caitlin Rose and others, are showing that the traditional/progressive combination can work to influence country in a positive way. What they need is a legitimate shot, and not the Shaft (IMHO).
Trigger
August 10, 2016 @ 8:00 pm
Good points Erik.
“with the womenfolk, they are each going to take their own individual approaches, hopefully rooted in the traditional spirit of country music, but also with the knowledge that traditionalism and progressive values can co-exist side by side, as Linda and Emmylou both demonstrated on their many great recordings.”
See, that’s why I think it is so important to single female artists out as opposed to saying, “Here’s six women. Support them becuase supporting women in country is the right thing to do.” There’s nothing wrong with that approach either, but folks like Loretta Lynn found fans in both men AND women by being unique and country and singing songs everyone could relate to, even if they were from a distinctly female perspective.
Dana M
August 12, 2016 @ 12:29 am
As a country music fan who listens primarily to female artists, it can be frustrating waiting to hear my favourite female artists played anywhere outside my iPod. Or expecting them to get the same coverage as their male counterparts. It’s painful waiting for albums every year from my favourite artists too. But with releases from Loretta Lynn, Lori McKenna, Sara Watkins, Sarah Jarosz, Margo Price, Brandy Clark, Michaela Ann, Kree Harrison, Aubrie Sellers, Dori Freeman, Elizabeth Cook, Lucinda Williams, Bonnie Bishop, Cheryl Deseree, Kirsty Lee Akers, Sierra Hull, Wynnona and the Big Noise and Dolly Parton it’s shaping up to be a good year. I’ve been waiting for the Sierra Hull one for a good while so it’s been especially awesome.
Dana M
August 12, 2016 @ 12:34 am
Forgot Kelsey Waldon, who I was listening to as I was typing my first comment!