Observations From 2011 Grammy Awards
I feel the need to iterate to you some observations for last night’s 2011 Grammy Awards, if only to get them off my chest. This is not entirely going to be a bitch fest. Every year they air the Grammy’s, and every year people are left scratching their heads and feeling hopelessness for music, and so it was to be expected that this year would be no different. If you want to see someone bitch about how so and so got screwed for such and such award, or how weird Lady Gaga is or specific commentary on how pronounced her camel toe is, there’s plenty of that out there in other places. What I’m more interested in is that as we stand on the brink of the music Apocalypse, and very specifically a country music Apocalypse, what information we can glean from the 2011 Grammy’s.
I just feel the need to say how embarrassed I am to be the benevolent dictator of a website that has the words “country music” in the name today. It wasn’t that Martina McBride and Miranda Lambert’s performances were bad. They were just fine, but just like at the Kennedy Center Honors presentation for Merle Haggard, whenever country music has an opportunity to showcase itself to the rest of the world, it is such a disappointment, and an embarrassment, as the country music establishment is more bent on pushing business agendas than the best talent.
It used to be that country music was virtually ignored by the Grammy’s. These were probably better times. Country music had it’s own awards, and the Grammy’s would maybe throw a country act in there for flavor, but it wasn’t really until the advent of “young country” in the late 80’s–Randy Travis and eventually Garth Brooks–that the Grammy’s started taking country seriously. Now, it probably accounts for 1/3 of the show, once again iterating the viability of the theory that music is becoming two super-genres: rap and country, with “pop” straddling the two.
Another piece of super-genre evidence was the anemic outlook for Rock. Jeff Beck, Neil Young, Tom Petty, Pearl Jam, Alice in Chains, Ozzy Ossbourne, Soundgarden, Stone Temple Pilots, Iron Maiden, Korn, Lamb of God, Megadeth, Slayer. This was the crop of nominees for rock awards for the night.
Most of these names are 20-year-old acts or older, and acts getting no radio play with little relevancy in the grand scheme of things. We’re reaching back to 80’s bands and the grunge era to fill out rock nominees? To say rock is dead is an understatement, and I can’t help but see blood on the hands of country music for helping be a part of this, as many country acts should really be filling these slots as they rip off AC/DC, The Black Crowes, other classic rock riffs, and do their best Bob Seger impersonations as true country music gets forced underground. Maybe this is a sign of what happens to genres when they cannot develop new talent.
And speaking of bad Bob Seger impersonations, where was Kid Rock? It seems like I can’t turn on my boob tube without seeing his mug. He’s on all the country award shows. Hell, he hosted the CMT’s, and here finally is an appropriate venue for him and he’s nowhere to be found.
Same can be said for Taylor Swift. She has the #1 album in the world right now, but she’s not even in the crowd so we can get occasional camera shots of her curiously set-apart eyes and a sparkly dress? The reason? Because what was the talk about at this time last year? Her bombing her performance with Stevie Nicks. She is country’s biggest and brightest star, and we have to treat her like the crazy aunt and hide her in the basement because she can’t sing. Or is this is all marketing because Swift management doesn’t want her getting overexposed, laying her low so she can sweep the awards shows next year.
The problem with presenting country music on a national stage is that there’s little to no talent on the mainstream level. Lady Antebellum, who wronged so many other much more deserving artists from other genres with their wins, is nothing more than a one hit wonder cast in the Taylor Swift mold. They are beneath Taylor Swift, like so many other mainstream country acts at this point. If I was Lady Antebellum, I would be embarrassed by the attention being given, because I would know in my heart it is completely undeserved. It’s one song. One song, and a one very isolated catchy vocal riff in that one song. You take that away, and all they have is a big bag of nothing.
If I was impressed by anything, it was the strength coming from the other super-genre. You can’t make a living in rap, or soul, or R&B without having some talent. I’m not talking about the Ushers and Justin Bieber’s; that’s pop. I’m talking about Eminem and Rihanna, and the new talent they pushed like Esperanza Spalding who won for best new artist. This isn’t my music, certainly not my style or speed, but quality shines through. If the music business is going to be pulled out of its tailspin, it is going to be from that side of the tracks. Country right now is the genre towing American music down.
Overall I was impressed by the sheer quality of everything last night. Maybe this was a product of lowered expectations, or maybe a symptom of watching so many country award shows lately. Comparatively to the CMA’s, the CMT’s, the ACM’s, there seemed to be more attention paid to quality, presentation, and the past at this years Grammy’s. Hell, Charlie Louvin got some face time last night.
One of my favorite performances of the night was The Avett Brothers mashup with Mumford and Sons, and eventually Bob Dylan. This stuff is probably on the very edge of what you might could classify as “country” or “roots,” and though I do think the performances were good, The Avett Brothers are finally getting some attention by getting away from their rootsy lineup and adding drums and electric bass, while Mumford seemed to take The Avett’s place by staying all acoustic and playing a kick drum: the same way The Avett’s cut their teeth. It’s like if roots music wants to be highlighted on a national level, it has to be a reduction. The announcer at one point couldn’t even pronounce The Avett’s name right, once again emphasizing that in the current music landscape, you can be a huge success story, play the Grammy’s, and nobody even knows who you are.
Also the tendency to lump performances into trios I find alarming. Yes, it does create cool pairings and allows more artists to be showcased, but it does so by diminishing the potency one artist, song, or solo performance can have, and just lends to the dwindling attention span of the American consumer. And the transplanted shill crowd of rabid fans right in front of the stage at virtually every nationally-televised music performance is getting old. We all know these people are pronged into acting excited, if not outright paid.
The most alarming incident of the night was the Indie rock performance and “Album of the Year” win for Arcade Fire. As I have stated before, Indie rock is the biggest threat to independent/underground roots music as they move to incorporate roots infrastructure more and more. This win can only embolden this trend. Why is Indie rock getting so much attention? Because Indie rock is safe money. Listen to me, and listen good. Poke and laugh at the hipsters and their funny clothes all you want, but they are coming, in droves, to take away what we have.
Sandman
February 14, 2011 @ 3:52 pm
Indie rock is the new grunge.
Also, I really wish The Grammys would drop the perform & win formula, it makes the awards so predictable.
As for the actual show last night, the best part was the Mumford & Sons/Avett Bros/Bob Dylan performance. If you stayed away from the show, I suggest hunting a youtube clip. One surprise for me that you didn’t mention was when they had Norah Jones, John Mayer and Keith Urban perform Jolene for Dolly Parton. I didn’t know Urban was that good of a guitar player, it certainly doesn’t come through in his music.
"Louie" Chris Lewis
February 14, 2011 @ 3:57 pm
That mashup was also great in my opinion. I’ve always been a fan of Norah Jones and John Mayer. I like Keith Urban as an artist but never cared too much for his music.
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 4:18 pm
Honestly, that happened right at the heart of a Joe Buck interview I was also trying to listen to, and when I saw Keith Urban and John Mayer, I was out. I will say I have observed Keith Urban’s guitar playing before. It is not good, I would call it average. But it is exceptional in that he can actually play the guitar and still be a pop country star. Brad Paisley might be one of the most underrated guitar players of our generation.
Kay
February 14, 2011 @ 5:21 pm
Thanks Triggerman, I love Brad Paisley’s guitar playing. The first time I saw him when he won the horizon award, (I stopped in my tracks and) I said, “there is a guy with real talent.” He has gotten away from his West Virginia roots a bit with the more pop stuff, but I think he really loves experimenting with all sorts of guitar styles, which he can do. He has real respect for real country so I am not ready to give up on him but I have been afraid to mention that I am a big fan before, LOL! To me, talent is talent and I am willing to give people a chance if they have it and work hard. You heard my daughter sing and she sang classical. You’ve never heard her sing country, but if you did, she could sell ya, even though she didn’t grow up poor and downtrodden.
Ernie
February 15, 2011 @ 8:58 am
Whenever I hear Brad Paisley I always think, how can a guy that plays the guitar that well make songs that are so bad.. it’s a shame.
Kay
February 15, 2011 @ 9:48 am
I agree. I do like ,Play, a tribute to Chet Atkins and Come on in with Buck Owens. I hope he gets back to more pure country instead of sucking up to politics anymore.
"Louie" Chris Lewis
February 14, 2011 @ 3:55 pm
Here is my take on the Grammys..I thought overall it was great but like you said out of all the great country music (pop or not) the best was not shown to the world that night. Miranda deserved her awards but I personally didn’t feel her performance was the best she’s done…not sure if she was sick or something. I did like the Mumford and Sons and Avett Brothers..they’re not my favorite entertaining acts but it was good to see some roots/folk music getting attention, but poor Bob Dylan needs to give it up. He never had much of a voice but he doesn’t have any voice now. I thought that was the worst performance of the night. I never liked Lady A and was shocked that they got so much attention as you say for that one hit song.
I also liked the grammys because it really seemed to give respect to the older acts that are still around. Mick Jagger did phenomenal in my opinion. The powerhouse tribute to It also seems that there is still creativity in HipHop, R&B, and Jazz circles. It really seemed to me like maybe Motown is coming back..between the Bruno Mars and Cee Lo Green which was great also. I personally like that it’s coming back.
I did notice that there is no more rock music and that’s a shame as well. As you said all there was no new rock music being presented but older acts which is fine but there should have been new rock acts introduced such as Cage the Elephant, BlackStone Cherry, Maylene and the Sons of Disaster, anything other than electronica british pop rock.
I am glad to see Ryan Bingham, Diamond Rio, Patty Loveless, Marty Stuart, Carolina Chocolate Drops, Buddy Guy, Pinetop Perkins, Switchfoot, and Black Keys got awards but too bad the overall public didn’t get to see those on tv.
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 4:14 pm
Though those awards were not presented on TV, they were presented, and to deserving bands. You would never see this kind of recognition to the lesser commercial side of things from the major country award shows. Marty Stuart gets more love from the Grammy’s than the CMA’s.
The “rap” super-genre is going to become a monster, and they are going to do so by expressing the best talent they have to offer, and being inclusive to jazz and soul and neo-traditionalist artists that are bringing purity. That is their plan. They is the way they are going to beat music contraction, and it is working.
Country’s plan is to continue to sell out to pop acts and make as much money as possible, like a sugar high before everything implodes and they can pull the cord on their golden parachutes.
Seeing how hip-hop is handling the current music climate, make me even more convicted that Music Row has no clue, and only has months to live.
"Louie" Chris Lewis
February 14, 2011 @ 4:32 pm
I wonder the same. I agree with ya that I think Hip Hop genre knows what they are doing and doing it well. To include Soul, R& B, and Jazz artists. They know who the “real” artists and purists are in their field and know how to expose them to the world whereas country and rock genres have fizzled out and have no clue what they are doing anymore. Personally I would like to see someone like T.Bone Burnett spearhead a new “music row” and include country, blues, folk, and bluegrass similiar to how Eminem, Dre, and JayZ have done for their genres. I personally think he has great taste in our genre of music. The same should be done with someone in the rock genre as well.
Kay
February 14, 2011 @ 5:00 pm
Ya, handling the climate….the music industry as we know it or want it to be, is slowly going. Where, I wish I knew. I do know something Some of the Hip Hop performers are some of the richest people in the world. Their beginnings were in drug money laundering and most likely still are. I have personal/professional experience there, (not pleasant ones either.)
IceColdCountry
February 14, 2011 @ 5:10 pm
Kay, I agree with what your saying about the importance of money in the hip hop world and I would caution anyone that is looking at hip hop as a model for the right direction of the future of music.
I am careful to say this, as to not sterotype, but money is the dirver in Hip Hop. Period. In some cases money needs to get laundered through the music. Money is #1, the music is #2. (with the exception of very few)
What they have to do make money they will do, much like the drug game but hopefully not to the violent extreme, althought we have seen that.
We are seeing hiphop/rap pull in acts and make music that is not anything like the hip hop/rap we saw 10-15 yrs. ago. I would argue they sellout a lot, to keep the money coming in. All of a sudden you have legendary jazz and R&B singers showing up in hiphop. Are they doing it right? Ask some hardcore rappers, they are being left behind just like Music Row leaves some behind.
Kay
February 14, 2011 @ 4:42 pm
Happy to see that Marty Stuart won. That song is great. A duo with him and Keith Urban would have been nice. I couldn’t bring myself to watch the show, but wish I would have seen Jagger, he is still the man who can rock. Rhianna is okay but not the great singer that she is acclaimed to be. Eminem is so angry I want to help him. I did like the Chrysler ad he did during the Super Bowl. He does care about Detroit. Can’t stand his “music” though. Repetitive monotone chanting isn’t my thing. Sure hope Indie doesn’t take over but total techno seems to be the new thing, just ask Taylor.
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 5:19 pm
The industry for hip hop music was built by selling poison to its own people, and whenever you hear hip-hop, you should never forget that. I do not own any Eminem albums, I’m not a rap fan, I’m not endorsing any of the music or the way it came into being. Simply as a side by side comparison, hip-hop and black-oriented music is doing a much better job mining, developing, and celebrating the best and the brightest in their world while country is in a talespin, offering bad pop music and uninspired performances as it’s billboard to the world.
Kay
February 14, 2011 @ 5:25 pm
Ah! Agreed my friend, please see my above post regarding this matter!!!
Kay
February 14, 2011 @ 5:41 pm
“while country is in a talespin, offering bad pop music and uninspired performances as it”™s billboard to the world. ”
You are right on!!!
We know, you know, I know, but the world is lapping this stuff up with a spoon. Money is the evil driving force behind everything that looks good and glossy on the surface and the better it looks, the more the youth are drawn to it and sucked in by it.
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 6:00 pm
I don’t know that the world is lapping it up. Sales are plummeting, and if you put country beside real talent like we saw last night, people will catch on even quicker. Country has survived by eating elements of rock, pop, and adult contemporary, but those genres are now spent. If country is going to stay a relevant mainstream genre, they MUST begin to innovate and develop new talent.
Kay
February 14, 2011 @ 6:09 pm
I am talking about the junk like Gaga and Perry.
Carla
February 14, 2011 @ 11:52 pm
Triggerman, sorry I have seriously missed something here. Can you please elaborate on “The industry for hip hop music was built by selling poison to its own people, and whenever you hear hip-hop, you should never forget that”? Cheers!
The Triggerman
February 15, 2011 @ 10:02 am
Well, I don’t want to dictate a history of rap here, but it all started with Eazy-E, who was a drug dealer in Compton, CA who started Ruthless Records with drug money. That is what NWA grew out of, with members Dr. Dre and Ice Cube, both who sold drugs too. Dr. Dre went on to form Death Row Records, and is a huge rap producer and executive these days, and the main man behind Eminem, and performed with him on the Grammy’s. I don’t think Eminem ever sold drugs, but the machine behind him started with drug money.
Jay-Z has admitted to selling crack cocaine to fund his music career.
I’m not saying ever rapper used to be a drug dealer or anything like that, but drug money was huge as forming the labels and structure for rap that is still around today.
Carla
February 15, 2011 @ 3:51 pm
I certainly appreciate the ‘Reader’s Digest History of Rap’ as I had NO idea that the industry was built with dirty money. Incidently, according to the documentary Cocaine Cowboys the impressive Miami skyline that sprung up in the ’80s was basically built with Cocaine profits. Interesting.
IceColdCountry
February 15, 2011 @ 4:05 pm
wow, Trigger, that is gutsy (and somewhat arrogant/ignorant) to state that ” hip hop music was built by selling poison to its own people, and whenever you hear hip-hop, you should never forget that.”
I think the culture that developed rap and hiphop is a bit more complex than reciting a behind the music special on NWA.
Carla, I can’t tell if your surprise is tongue-n-cheek or serious?
NLindsay
February 15, 2011 @ 4:13 pm
Yeah, that is one story behind West Coast rap origins, which was a major factor in raps explosion into the suburbs of America.
The Triggerman
February 15, 2011 @ 4:45 pm
I’m not talking about The Fat Boys and DJ Jazzy Jeff & The Fresh Prince. That was all pop to begin with. Like Nlindsay said, I’m talking about the “gansta rap” that infiltrated white American suburbs and became a widespread cultural phenomenon, and allowed people like Dr. Dre, who was in NWA, funded by Eazy E’s drug money, and now produces everything for Eminem, the biggest rapper ever, to create the same music empire Eminem is still a part of today. And on the east coast Jay Z admits himself he climbed his way up the ladder by selling crack cocaine. I am not saying ALL rap is or was funded by hard drug money, but a lot of it was, including the same infrastructure that Eminem uses today. And i think most rappers would agree with me.
And I haven’t seen any “Behind the Music”. I don’t have cable. I happen to be a helpless music nerd who as studied extensively the origins of “gansta rap”. I can’t tell you who the biggest rappers are now, or name you any of their songs, but I know where it all came from.
You sure do like kicking me in the nuts IceCold.
Gillian
February 15, 2011 @ 4:52 pm
I understand you’re not a fan Trig, but I can’t let this one go. Straight Outta Compton came out in 1988, but hip-hop stated on the streets of the South Bronx a decade prior. I grew up in the city in the 70s and saw the birth of it. MCs (Master of Ceremonies) would throw parties with two turntables and a microphone and kids would make a mat out of a cardboard box and dance on it. That’s how it started.
You can choose to believe the hype the media put out, or your can get a better view on sites like Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hip-hop I’m also not saying it’s without its own drugs and problems but don’t dare make assumptions about something you know nothing about.
IceColdCountry
February 15, 2011 @ 4:58 pm
I’m not kicking you around, but to insinuate that these guys sold drugs to build rap music or get in the music game isn’t exactly accurate. Selling drugs was more how they survived from where they came from. Right or wrong is a whole other discussion.
White kids buying it up, well that would lead a drug dealer to say, hell, I got enough money to buy some studio time and cut an album and sell it to white kids for legit money.
Also, saying “selling poison to its own people”??? what does that mean? Kid Rock sold drugs, Eminem did too. So who is its “own people”?
Not to mention these “people” you refer to weren’t exactly making the drugs in their huge project apartments, it got there by some other people. Again, another discussion.
It is just a pretty strong statement you made on a pretty charged topic.
The Triggerman
February 15, 2011 @ 5:55 pm
Gillian,
I am not talking about the origins of the art form, I am talking about the initial capital behind the machine. Nowhere can you find me talking about the origins of rap on a sonic level. Let me spell it out as simply as I possibly can, and try to re-direct this to how it pertains to the 2011 Grammy’s:
Dr. Dre and Eminem performed together on the show. Dr. Dre is the money man and producer behind Eminem. Dr. Dre was in NWA. NWA got it’s initial capital to start its own record label by selling drugs on the streets of Compton. It’s that simple. Jay Z is another example. He has numerous songs talking about how he got the initial money to do his recordings by selling drugs, and specifically crack cocaine. And this theme can be found in numerous rapper’s lives, as IceCold pointed out, even with Kid Rock and Eminem himself. I am not trying to discount all of rap or start an incendiary argument here. In fact, I am getting my nuts kicked by rednecks right now who think I’m a huge Eminem fan and will never read my site again because I promote rap. I am simply stating obvious facts about parallels to the funding of SOME rap music and the drug trade that I think are very well documented by other sources to the point of being redundantly obvious.
I would hope that as I near the 3 year anniversary of this website, that people would appreciate a little more that I don’t open my mouth and make assertions unless I know what I’m talking about. I’m not saying I know everything, but if I don’t know about something, I will not remark on it, or admit as much. Give me a little more credit than thinking I thought rap started in 1988 on the West Coast.
Gillian
February 15, 2011 @ 8:15 pm
I cannot disagree with your point about the industry represented on this year”™s Grammy show. When I read the sentence “The industry for hip hop music was built by selling poison to its own people, and whenever you hear hip-hop, you should never forget that.” I got mad and figured you really had no idea. I”™m protective over grassroots hip-hop and that statement is too general for me to swallow. I understand your larger point.
Carla
February 16, 2011 @ 1:16 pm
IceColdCountry, my surprise was genuine. I know very little about rap/hip hop. It’s not a genre of music I listen to so really know nothing about it’s roots. I’m always interested in music history though, regardless of the genre. I’m currently reading Peter Guralnick’s Sweet Soul Music and have been listening to a Stax compliation in my car on the drive to work. Hey Triggerman, THAT would be an interview I’d love to see: Peter Guralnick! I am presuming you are a fan?
IceColdCountry
February 16, 2011 @ 1:30 pm
Thanks Carla for the reply.
Your genuine surprise is exactly what my concern was with Trig’s history on hiphop/rap. It is on some level accurate, but not entirely nor close to the whole side. I don’t know every aspect of it, but when someone like yourself asks about it, the person replying should be careful to make statements and paint a broad picture where, in this example, you might think all hiphop comes from drug money. You think that, then tell someone else, who tells someone else, and that isn’t good.
There are some folks that come on this site for the first time and might know little about the music industry or country music industry specifically (me being one), and when someone offers an explaination, it should be with some caution, knowing that the people reading might take it as the truth.
Same when people call other artists souless and give a lame reason. It could keep someone from exploring that artist music simply because someone else made a half-truth statement.
Carla
February 16, 2011 @ 2:14 pm
IceColdCountry, don’t worry too much about it. I am pretty discerning and realised that Triggerman just provided a quick snapshot 🙂 I think he was using broad strokes there to answer my question as the site isn’t called ‘Saving Rap Music’. Heh heh.
Autopsy IV
February 14, 2011 @ 3:58 pm
I’m guessing the “the suburbs” drop was a joke?
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 4:05 pm
No, in my haste to get this out today, I switched band name for album title. Fixed.
Dude Abides
February 14, 2011 @ 4:23 pm
100% spot-on. Well done Sir.
CJ
February 14, 2011 @ 4:30 pm
I was pretty disappointed with Miranda Lambert’s performance. Like you said, it wasn’t bad, but it wasn’t good either. There was no richness with her tone, and she seemed uncomfortable. Perhaps she was nervous? Was the Grammy her biggest audience since she started out?
And Lady Antebellum winning Country Album. Hmmm….so that is country’s best album for the year? Hmmm….
IceColdCountry
February 14, 2011 @ 4:53 pm
It certainly was her first Grammy performance and I thought she looked nervous but it came off as genuine to me. There wasn’t lip syncing, and she is just standing there alone singing. Not to many other acts do that on the grammys.
I was dissapointed in the Lady A pick. I always thought, for the most part, the grammys made a better choice on country albums than CMA’s ACM’s. With who Lady A was up against, they were behind them all for quality of work.
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 5:24 pm
I too felt it was uninspired. I spent about a half hour today trying to run down two videos of Miranda singing the song in two different keys. I was convinced that a key change was the reason it felt so flat, but at this point, I can’t come up with the evidence. One reason could be because here in mid February, this song is just . . . old hat. She’s sung it hundreds of times now. It’s a great song, but you can’t sing last year’s hit on this year’s Grammy’s and expect it to go over well.
Miranda’s performance was the one marquee solo country performance of the night, and look how we are talking about it. This is not the way country needs to be portraying itself to a general audience. I’d rather it not be portrayed at all.
CJ
February 14, 2011 @ 5:34 pm
I felt she had this great chance to show the whole world that you don’t need hype or gimmicks to be effective in performing, that great vocals are enough to capture the audience, and she failed to do so.
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 6:02 pm
That’s a damn good point CJ. Just a simple, heartfelt performance would have made Lady Gaga and Katy Perry look like attention whores with no substance beyond flashy costumes and elaborate dance routines. Instead it just made country look stuffy and uninspired.
Cliff England
February 14, 2011 @ 4:48 pm
Triggerman,
Did you find any significance in the fact Jamey Johnson wasn’t present even though he was nominated?
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 5:29 pm
Hmm. I guess one could surmise its because he doesn’t like the pomp and circumstance of these things, but he has indulged in it before at the country award shows. I’d probably me more inclined to show my mug at the Grammy’s these days than the ACM’s, which are littered with controversy.
Maybe it’s because he knew he was a long shot.
I think that people need to appreciate that even though most country fans know who Jamey Johnson is, and he’s a critic’s darling, and wins lots of awards and gets lots of attention, commercially and in the mainstream world, he is a virtual unknown still, compared to Taylor Swift or Lady Antebellum.
IceColdCountry
February 14, 2011 @ 5:47 pm
Although it is easy to get an individual from one side of the country to the next, but perhaps, looking at Jamey’s tour schedule, he played 2/13 in S.C., then a gig tonight in FLA. Perhaps it was a logistics thing.
IceColdCountry
February 14, 2011 @ 4:50 pm
I found the quality of most performances pretty decent. Coming off the Super Bowl mess and the last 3years worth of shows mainly showcasing Taylor Taylor Taylor, this was refreshing.
I can’t support Lady A as “country”, they are adult contemporary to me. Nothing more, nothing less. But they say “whiskey” in the song, so they get the country tab. I also think Lady A and Sugarland have been the formula for the last few years to find the money that Taylor and Paisley/Urban/Chesney haven’t dominated. I don’t see Lady A being an issue much longer.
What I find concerning with your takes, and most of the articles you write about mainstream award shows, is the lack of support for what actaully is good in the country scene. How about the other nominations for country album? Any of them deserved it more than Lady A if your looking for a more country style, yet you didn’t mention them at all? They might not be the kings of the underground, but not commenting on them at all??? They seem to be fighting a little for the right kind of music.
Dierks bluegrass album was done very well.
Zac Brown- I am not a huge fan, but they at least have talent
Jamey Johnson’s album was very good, and he has a huge following but isn’t a Music Row darling.
Miranda’s album is very good and I think she will only get better. I don’t see her slipping into a pop-country singer.
I just see it as a waste of time to talk about what is wrong with country after every awards show, it is obvious. But your doom and gloom takes are over shadowing what appears to be a few that get through to these shows that isn’t solely based on label support, but they can’t be ignored.
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 5:41 pm
Well, getting nominated at then getting beat out by Lady A IS doom and gloom. That’s the story. Nobody needs to come here to see who got nominated. Those names get plenty of other play all over the web. Again, as I have stated to you before, many many times, I talk about the underground names here more than the big names, because this is the only outlet for the underground names, and the big names have all kinds of support. It’s not necessarily even about preference or taste.
And yeah, I am doom and gloom, because were in the midst of the country music apocalypse. Actually I’d call it less “doom and gloom” and more cold realism.
This was not a review of the Grammy’s, it is simply some observations from various parts of the show that I thought were interesting or informative. Take them or leave them. And I thought I was quite positive about what others are doing in music. As a country hardliner, I am supposed to be naturally opposed to all the hip-hop racket and black bombastic-ness. But they’re getting it right, and we’re getting it wrong. Hopefully hip-hop can prop up the music industry while country tries to figure out how to get it’s shit together.
IceColdCountry
February 14, 2011 @ 5:55 pm
I guess I don’t see what this article was for than? Your not telling us anything we don’t know, just reminding us of your view on the music industry. It is the same basic play by play you give about “country music out of Nashville is going to hell.” So? It is shit music, let it ruin itself. Music Row isn’t going to shut down, it will find its way as it has for generations.
Honestly, blogging about it and stating the obvious does nothing but allow you to say “told you so”.
We all know. When a mainstream awards show comes and goes with nothing good, your right, lots of other websties cover it. So why bother here?
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
Don’t be so confident that Music Row will never shut down my friend. It could happen in mere months. The Opry might still be standing, but all those buildings that house subsidiaries of huge music corporations that are based out of town might pull up stakes any time.
And as for stating the obvious, there may be some of that here, but I sure as hell would have never guessed I would have come on here touting the talent of hip-hoppers on a blog called Saving Country Music. I’m surprised by that myself, and I’m sure there’s many others that are finding it surprising. This is simply an opinion piece. I’m not forcing you to read any of this.
And I’m not complaining about country music to grandstand or to preach to the choir, I am doing it because I love country music and it’s worth fighting for. Believe it or not, my statements are meant to be proactive.
Duluke
February 15, 2011 @ 7:25 am
IceCold, you often have some good points and start good conversations on this site, but why complain about this? The more often this issue is addressed and backed up with facts and a well written article, the better. Why would you prefer Lady A’s unjust wins be ignored by this champion for country music? You don’t see the point of this article, I don’t see the point of your whining.
IceColdCountry
February 15, 2011 @ 8:43 am
I understand that there is some relevance to writng about the award shows, but is anyone surprised Lady A swept it up? We all, and most around the country know they aren’t country, but we all knew they were going to win most likely. You could even tell that with the vibe from the crowds reaction. It wasn’t exactly a huge ovation.
My point is, (and I am not simply whining, I think I do back some things up or give some options) why not make mention (since everywhere else they mention the winners and how good or bad performances were) mention the fact that there are some bands that are more country than pop country starting to show up on these award shows. It takes time to get the whole thing turned around, but it is starting to happen. We know what music is shit. But a site like this (and it is not my site) but just a suggestion, talk about the grammy nods for the others that certainly don’t sound like straight up pop-country.
I turely thought Dierks or Jamey Johnson might pull it out (simply because the grammys in the past have kind of have gone against the CMA/ACM winners). I don’t like to speculate, but what if Dierks or Jamey had won? What would this site be talking about?
The Triggerman
February 15, 2011 @ 10:05 am
I honestly had no idea Lady A would win so many awards, it took me by surprise. I thought Jamey had a chance because the critics have been so strong behind him.
Ga. Outlaw
February 14, 2011 @ 5:14 pm
I’m truely sad. Ever sence I was a little kid I couldn’t wait for all the award shows & all there great preformances. The last award show I tried to watched was the CMT’s. The opening was one of the most offinsive things I’ve ever seen. While not a huge fan I’ve always respected Martina McBride, but I felt ashamed of what she took part in there. The final thing that made me turn it off was the completely unfunny Reba skit featuring the fat kid from Good Burger (now on SNL) & Reba herself. Also the teenage girl presenting with Blake Shelton did nothing but make dirty jokes about his Hillbilly Bone. I felt so emmbaressed for both of them. Cledus T. Juss said it best “Hell No turn it off”.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qqdBvyFc0o
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FV8cW5SONCI
Kay
February 15, 2011 @ 7:45 am
Thanks for those Outlaw,
So darn funny and so darn true!!!!
I am smiling and feeling good to start my day!!
Gillian
February 14, 2011 @ 5:16 pm
I’m overjoyed by Esperanza Spalding’s win. She is the bee’s knees. I also agree that hip-hop is finally running the show right. With all the crap out there (citing your Grammy story last year), it makes it hard to see the great stuff sometimes. One of the things I like most about our genres is the respect for elders. Charlie Louvin has mounting medical bills and one of our best documentarians hits the ground running. DJ Kool Herc is hospitalized and Russell Simmons picks up the tab. What I see in our genre compared to early hip-hop is the love. Rappers wrote love songs about hip-hop (and are constantly fretting over its demise). We cover the greatest songwriters in the world and make our own genius. This is going somewhere because the sheer force of it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g-rWNAQx1ZE
Kay
February 14, 2011 @ 5:31 pm
Very talented gal! I did not watch the Grammys. Did she play electric bass or upright bass on the show?
Gillian
February 15, 2011 @ 6:20 am
I think I saw her on both, but I could be wrong.
Andra
February 14, 2011 @ 5:26 pm
I was so thirlled when The Alan Parson’s Project won all those awards for “Eye in the Sky”. The grammy people kept mispronouncing thier name, calling them Lady Antebelleum or something. I don’t know, but it about time that song got some notice!!!
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 5:53 pm
Ahhh. I have soured slightly on that take since the CMA’s. I still think there is some validity to that claim, but it seems the pro-Parsons side might have fudged some evidence to help them, and I’d prefer the fair fight. I think Lady A is awful enough on their own right without looking desperate and making stretches.
If anybody is wonder what we’re talking about:
https://savingcountrymusic.com/lady-antebellums-cma-single-rips-off-alan-parsons
Andra
February 15, 2011 @ 7:53 am
I concur, they are awful enough. since the mention of APP, every time I hear Lady A, its all I think of!! You’re right, that’s probably why it was so hugely successful!!
Aran
February 14, 2011 @ 5:37 pm
As far as I’m concerned, “Grammy” was a sweet old lady who made cookies and spoiled me and my sister as kids.
Seriously though, it hurt listening to the radio this morning and hearing all about the crap that won awards. Lost count of how many times I announced to my coworkers that Lady Anta-whatever is NOT COUNTRY. I have a good friend who’s been into indie rock since before it was cool, and he recently bemoaned that indie has “gone mainstream”. Well, no doubt of that after last night. We can only hope that, like grunge, it will grow too quickly too fast and implode on itself.
Did Soundgarden play? Do they still have it?
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 5:49 pm
I’m not sure about these grunge and indie rock comparisons. Indie and hipsters have been around for quite a while, and have always been “indie”, meaning independent and somewhat underground. Grunge started as a regional movement that very quickly went international and exploded and dominated the mainstream. I don’t think indie rock, or any movement, can get the same reaction that grunge did, and if it was going to, it would have already happened. It think indie is working much more slowly, seeping into cities, talking over clubs and venues, then working its way up from there. I like some indie rock, and some of the bands do not deserve the negative stereotype that I am probably helping perpetuate here. I hope the best for all heartfelt music, I just don’t want them incorporating my record labels, venues, and institutions to do so.
Aran
February 14, 2011 @ 5:57 pm
You’re right Triggerman. Grunge developed slowly too, just not in the limelight. Once all eyes were on Seattle it took very little time for the whole thing to fall through the floor. Which in my opinion is a crying shame.
I don’t like indie rock, but some of it is good music. No autotune or that other junk. It’s funny to me though that a genre that prides itself on being, well, indie, is so mainstream now. At least in this college town it is.
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 7:45 pm
This is the thing: hipsters like indie rock because they like the independent approach to things. Just like us, they hate big corporate control of music, and they also are ignored by the mainstream, or they used to be. That is why they find roots infrastructure so appealing, because it fits their ideals. They so a cool little venue, or something like Austin City Limits, and they think: “Hey, that not some big corporate bullshit, that is where we belong.” Problem is when they take over, others are kicked out on the street. This is also the reason indie rock will never get too big.
Aran
February 15, 2011 @ 7:13 am
Of all the music I have to listen to at work, indie rock is the style I dislike the least. My philosophy is this: if you have to work SO hard to not be “mainstream”, then you’re just a different kind of mainstream. And the fact that indie rock has gotten so big supports this. I know it’s unrealistic to expect everyone to make music simply for the love of music, but a lot of indie music I’ve heard just sound like they’re trying so hard to sound weird (singing in falsetto, WAY too much reverb, or effects, on the vocals). It’s tiring to listen to.
Denise
February 14, 2011 @ 6:52 pm
How are hipsters going to take away what we have? Great blog Triggerman and I just don’t watch which is a shame seeing how I really love music. All kinds of music. But I don’t like some of that, some of this, political strongholds and corporate greed awarded with a golden disk player. So I just don’t watch.
The Triggerman
February 14, 2011 @ 7:41 pm
I watch these stupid awards shows so others do have to. I get no enjoyment from it.
Indie rock has already co-opted many venues here in the “Live Music Capitol of the World,” Austin, TX. Venues that used to be for roots and country bands are now filled with eepish frap music and fans with headbands and ironic mustaches. Austin City Limits has come out and said they want to cater to a “hipper, younger” crowd, and that is being reflected in their lineups. Similar things are happening in east Nashville and college towns all across the country. Hipsters tend to be from middle to upper class families and tend to have more disposable income than lower class, working roots fans, and so it is seen as a financial upgrade for a venue or institution.
Brooke
February 14, 2011 @ 8:54 pm
Too bad the Mother’s Best recordings did not win in their category.
http://ahankwilliamsjournal.wordpress.com/2011/02/14/beatles-beat-mothers-best-at-grammy-awards/
Carla
February 15, 2011 @ 12:23 am
Much as I’d love to chime in with all the bitching and moaning here, the Grammy’s were not screened in New Zealand. Nothing. Nada. We got many hours of red carpet stuff on E! then nothing. So disappointed.
Speaking of genre crossing: how is it that bands like Iron Maiden, Lamb of God, Megadeth and Slayer get nominated for rock awards? Last time I checked they were metal. Is there not a more appropriate category for them? Just plain weird. That would be just like putting mainstream pop acts like Taylor Swift and Keith Urban in the country category! Ahem.
Whilst I was fortunate enough to NOT have to endure a performance by John “My dick is sort of like a white supremacist” Mayer, I was disturbed to see him sauntering along the red carpet looking like a Johnny Depp impersonator. I actually think that man bugs me more than the Taylor Swifts and Keith Urbans of this world.
I am fascinated by the “indie rock” commentary but don’t feel I can really comment on it as music culture on the other side of the planet is just so very different. NZ has always had a huge American indie rock following – going back decades. It’s the first place on the planet that The White Stripes got their first Gold Record (or a similar accolade, I can’t find any online info on it) There is a genre called “Dub” which I’m sure you’ve heard of, it’s a meshing of reggae and downbeat. It is very underground in the US and UK however here it is Top 20 and sits alongside Justin Bieber, Katy Perry and Lady Gaga and sells hugely. It’s what is played at every backyard BBQ by the most mainstream folks imaginable. Whilst that is irrelevant to this conversation, it’s just to demonstrate the literal ocean that exists between what is mainstream in the US and what is mainstream elsewhere.
And people, please stop hating on the above pop acts I mentioned above! Remember we are not their target demographic and we were 14 once too 😉 When I was 14 I was all about Billy Idol, Motley Crue and G ‘n R!
Kay
February 15, 2011 @ 6:55 am
Oh Carla, please don’t use “hating on.” I am so tired of being called a hater because I disagree with something. It started with Barack Obama and if you don’t agree with his presidency, you are a racist or a hater. Now all the kiddies are saying if we don’t like Taylor, we are either jealous or haters. Lol, it is getting as tiresome as 24/7.
When I was 14, I loved the Beatles, Rolling Stones, Herman’s Hermits, and lots of Mo Town. All of which could actually sing and are still around, classics.
I, however, DO understand your point and to each their own. I think we are just being overwhelmed by fake manufactured music and it is leading many kids down a path of believing that carrying a tune and being able to sing has nothing to do with music.
Kay
February 15, 2011 @ 6:59 am
Carla, I have no problem with Motley Crew or Billy Idol. Real toe tappers, both. I love lots of heavy metal and rock! If they can sing, it’s alright by me!!
Carla
February 15, 2011 @ 3:59 pm
Actually Kay the ‘hating on’ comment was in jest. I thought that would have been obvious by the silly little winking smiley face I inserted there? However I think you missed my point, I am not defending what you call fake manufactured music, I am just pointing out that many of these acts are for the kids – you know those short little people with the high pitched voices? Let them have their pop music! Let them be young. They don’t need to be discerning or concern themselves with anything other than liking what they hear. If it makes them happy it’s served it’s purpose. They will be middle aged, cynical and snobby about music just like me soon enough!
Kay
February 15, 2011 @ 6:03 pm
Haha, we all use smiley faces so much these days, it went right past me. Sorry.
The Triggerman
February 15, 2011 @ 10:09 am
Just to clarify, the metal bands were up for metal awards. I lumped a bunch of nominees together for space. The point is, all of these are older legacy bands. There’s nothing, or very little that’s new.
Carla
February 15, 2011 @ 4:00 pm
Oh okay, my input into this conversation is bordering on the ignorant seeing as I never got to see the damned show.
Pucci
February 15, 2011 @ 8:02 am
I am going to make this comment short and to the point, when i was reading a this, the part where you said
“You can”™t make a living in rap, or soul, or R&B without having some talent. I”™m not talking about the Ushers and Justin Bieber”™s; that”™s pop. I”™m talking about Eminem and Rihanna, and the new talent they pushed like Esperanza Spalding who won for best new artist. This isn”™t my music, certainly not my style or speed, but quality shines through. If the music business is going to be pulled out of its tailspin, it is going to be from that side of the tracks.”
Country might be worse off than Rap, but Rap is also a dying breed of “music” too, though it’s really not music, I’ve been through the “black wanna be phase” once in my life (the sad part of growing up ignorant and trying to be something I’m not) so i have seen how shitty the Rap scene has been, Eminem was good back for his first two albums but not impressed with the rest, though i won’t get into that much since the site isn’t about the crap that Rap has been putting out recently. Anyways, yeah that’s all i have to say.
The Triggerman
February 15, 2011 @ 10:20 am
There’s some people, including some not willing to comment here, that have taken this article as some sort of endorsement of Eminem or rap or whatever. Not saying that is your assertion, but I have heard from some people who feel this way. I have been doing this for three years, and I think it’s pretty clear where my loyalties lie. I simply was commenting on the strength of how rap presented itself compared to how country presented itself, and in my opinion, rap did a much better job, and does a much better job developing talent. I don’t enjoy saying this because I’m a country guy. But I’m also a horrible liar, and a steadfast realist.
I do not think that rap is on the way out. Quite the contrary, I think rap is propping up the rest of the music industry. If you look at the sales #’s from last year, every single genre of music declined by double digits, except for country. It declined by single digits. The only genre to increase sales was rap.
https://savingcountrymusic.com/the-future-of-music-the-mono-genre-micro-genres
4J
February 15, 2011 @ 9:37 am
This is my first visit to this site, and I must say, I really love it. Nice work. While I do think Lady Antebellum is definitely talented, they are obviously in the wrong genre. Do I think Need You Now deserved 5 Grammys? No. That just kicks the door open even wider (if possible) for more pop fluff to be shuffled in.
In regards to Miranda’s performance…..in addition to the understandable nerves she had, her grandmother passed away just the day before. I thought she did great, personally. No bells, no whistles. That, a lot of times, is enough to inpress the hell out of me, no matter who it is.
It’s safe to say I’ll be back for more reading.
The Triggerman
February 15, 2011 @ 10:26 am
When I was watching the Grammy’s I really did sympathize with Lady Antebellum, because the focus on them was unfair, and has now made them subject to ridicule and backlash. Sure, I’m sure they were hoping for a few awards, but 6 probably hurt more than helped. And just like Taylor Swift, in some ways I sympathize with them because someone should have told them NOT to call their music country, just pop or adult contemporary, and now that has left them open to ridicule from “mean” people like me. But of course, the reason they don’t call themselves Adult Contemporary is because that genre has no support any more. It’s either rap or country, and if you want your music heard by the masses, you have to choose one.
I’m sorry to hear that Miranda’s grandmother passed away. That might be the insight we have been looking for. I didn’t think it was a bad performance, just a little flat. Just to play Devil’s Advocate, sometimes a tragedy will lead to an inspired performance.
Guse
February 15, 2011 @ 10:04 am
I appreciate your review of the Grammys. Now I choose to ignore the Grammys. This is the first time Neil Young has won a Grammy for his music…proof that these awards mean nothing, except to Lady Ga Ga and her lawyers.
Do some of them have talent? of course they do.
Is it a representation of the American music scene? Absolutely Not.
It’s fun for some, but you will never see a band like Drive-By Truckers, Lucero, or Yo La Tengo (for you hipsters) win a Grammy. Radio is to blame for most of this. The only place you can access music beyond the mainstream is independent/public radio and the industry does everything it can to stop them, including eliminating government funding.
btw, great site, I just found it today. I look forward to expanding my catalog of real country!
the pistolero
February 15, 2011 @ 12:36 pm
all of these are older legacy bands
I don’t see why this is such a bad thing, though. I can’t speak for Iron Maiden as I haven’t heard enough of their more recent music to comment, but Megadeth’s last album, Endgame, was one of the best they’ve ever made. If those legacy bands are still making good music, why not recognize it?
The Triggerman
February 15, 2011 @ 1:34 pm
That’s a really good point. I’m glad these older acts are getting recognized if they’re still putting out good music, unlike country which when it comes to awards seems to shun its legacy acts. The point I was trying to illustrate is that there’s virtually NO newer rock bands in the mix. If it was half and half, or even 1/4 to 3/4’s, I probably would have not taken notice at all. But when all you have to draw from is artists that have been around for 20+ years, you know you’re not developing any new talent, and your genre is dying. And in the case of rock, the sales numbers back this theory up.
the pistolero
February 15, 2011 @ 11:57 pm
The point I was trying to illustrate is that there”™s virtually NO newer rock bands in the mix.
This is true. I’ll admit I don’t even bother with modern rock; you’ll find me listening to ’70s and ’80s hard rock and heavy metal pretty much exclusively compared to everything after, say, 1994.
On the other hand, are awards in general an honest assessment of where our music is? Generally speaking, that is, not just country. Look at the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame; Mahalia Jackson and Madonna are members but Bad Company and Rush aren’t. Honestly, why should such an institution be given any credibility whatsoever?
The Triggerman
February 16, 2011 @ 12:02 am
Another good point Pistolero.
IceColdCountry
February 15, 2011 @ 3:26 pm
Totally out of left field a bit, but does anyone see that the music is a reflection on some levels, of the fashon trends?
’80’s styles are coming back fashion wise. (no comment on whether that is good or bad) And you see/hear that in the music too. Rap isn’t hard rap anymore, and HipHop is becoming more techno/80’s than ever before.
Current “Rock” bands- Arcade Fire, are a version of “80’s punk rock”
Hard Rock music has a fashion style as well, and that isn’t the current fashion trend. (black leather, grundge whatever, isn’t “in”) It is tight jeans and high tops, so not a lot of hard rockers coming up through the ranks.
Who’s the next good looking hard rocker? Bring him in wearing black leather and big hair and watch the hard rock genre come back.
Everyone wanted to dress like an urban cowboy a few years ago, but that has changed. People see through the urban cowboy and would rather see the real deal cowboy. Thus I think that the “suburb friendly” pop country music is following suit.
Fashion has a lot to do with what music is on top and vice versa. Some music will never make it on top, but radio follows music trends, which sets and follows fashion trends.
It all comes back around. How you get it will be different, but to think that real country can’t be back on top, is a bit extreme.
The Triggerman
February 15, 2011 @ 5:00 pm
This is a very interesting point. As much as it sickens me, fashion and music tend to go hand in hand. The Sex Pistols grew out of a scene that was centered around a clothing store. I think a lot of the “hipsters” we’ve been talking about come for the fashion scene, and stay for the music. Just like any type of music, there are variations, and I think there is a lot of good, heartfelt “indie rock”, but a lot of it is based solely on image, with very little substance. Eeepish, falsetto vocals like Aran said above, and flair.
Arcade Fire had a girl drummer that I paid specific attention to. They had two drummers. The one was actually playing. She was simply there for show, like the dancing guy from the Might Mighty Bosstones or something. She was holding her drumsticks in the middle and barely playing. This would be like holding a baseball bat in the middle, and trying to hit a ball. There is absolutely no redeeming value to holding your drumsticks that way. It was almost like she wanted to telegraph that she didn’t know what she was doing. Because that looks cool. In the case of a lot of indie rock, the need for fashion and acceptance impinges on the substance of the music. That is a bad thing.
Carla
February 16, 2011 @ 1:31 pm
“The Sex Pistols grew out of a scene that was centered around a clothing store”
Oh Triggerman, not just a clothing store but a clothing store started by Vivienne Westwood! I don’t follow fashion and I have no understanding of why people spend zillions on designer labels however the ONE fashion designer I have respect for is her. She’s a wonderful train wreck of a woman. She’s still around, doing her thing. The Sex Pistols …. hmmmm, they’ve been rather quiet for some time now.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vivienne_Westwood
Pucci
February 15, 2011 @ 6:54 pm
that’s the sad part of living in this era, music is mainly about how you dress and if you don’t dress that way then you’re not that genre, obviously Country being the biggest, because Country, like Punk and Goth, is a State of Mind, not a Fashion Statement. i might be from New York (not the City, not even close) and i might not be as Country as the folks in the South, but i damn sure am Country.
Pucci
February 15, 2011 @ 7:05 pm
i meant “but Country, like Punk and Goth, is a State of Mind, not a Fashion Statement”
NLindsay
February 15, 2011 @ 7:30 pm
Interesting point to bring up. I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the answer to the question of ‘What is country music?’.
For anyone who likes reading books about music, I just finished what I found to be a really entertaining and fairly informative book called “Dreaming Out Loud”. It mostly focuses on the mid 90’s country scene as that’s when the author did his research so be warned, there is quite a bit about the Garth Brooks machine, The Judds and Wade Hayes.
Throughout the book the author touches on the idea that at one time, country music was region or geography based. By that I mean it was music for people who had moved from the countryside to the urban areas out of necessity. The second part of the idea is that around a blurry time between the 80’s – 90’s, country music (at least popular country music) transitioned from being region-based to values-based, which is what helped turn a lot of folks onto it.
Obviously there’s a lot more factors than that involved over the years and maybe someone will bring them up here, but it’s just an idea that got me thinking as to what the base of popular country music is today. it certainly does seem to be (like nearly everything popular in our culture) to be based on image. Style over substance is the best I’ve come up with. Damn, now I lost my train of though while typing this. Anyways, I dug the book, look it up if it sounds interesting.
And on that note, here’s a TV commercial that cracks me up everytime because it’s like someone made a parody of pop-country that hits close enough to home to piss us off. Unfortunately, I’m pretty sure it’s legit.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S63EI63nvIE
GAG!
NLindsay
February 15, 2011 @ 7:48 pm
Holy crap I think Trig is onto something with the mono-genre prediction. I just found a site where you can download that video in THREE flavors. Country, pop/urban, or Spanish.
The Triggerman
February 15, 2011 @ 8:01 pm
I love how they tell us that the jingle chick is a “recording artist” like that holds some clout, or the onus is on you to know who she is. I sure as hell have never heard of her.
And please people, don’t ever rent a couch. That is the essence of throwing away your money.
Kay
February 16, 2011 @ 2:05 pm
Haha, never rent to own anything if you an help it, waste of lots of money.
This video proves what I have been saying about the blond image/interchangeable blond thing that hey are using to sell music. Lol, just had to get that in. (Hey Iced Cold, this is what I was saying). 🙂
Carla
February 16, 2011 @ 1:33 pm
That is pretty much the most awesome thing I have ever seen. That dancing dog is my favourite.
Roscoe
February 15, 2011 @ 8:03 pm
I think Indie rock is getting bigger because people might be looking for something authentic that doesn’t mean the machine won’t capitalize on it but
Rob
February 16, 2011 @ 7:44 pm
Grammy highlight: lifetime achievement for the Ramones
Kenny
February 23, 2012 @ 12:12 am
I saw Arcade Fire live and have listened to their music for years since Funeral. Other than Bright Eyes I haven’t seen any other band play for the crowd and display the kind of energy they put into every single show. And they are big and they deserve the recognition because their music is genuine, unique and a light in the dark for so many people. Say what you want about cliche “indie” and its impending mainstream takeover, I see it happening too. Some of it’s happening through YouTube. Also there’s shit like Pumped Up Dicks that is a pop song with an indie aesthetic, but don’t include Arcade Fire among those bands. They’ve been making the music they want exactly how they want for almost 10 years, while donating money to Haiti the whole time. They’ve also done all of this while remaining on Merge Records, a fucking awesome North Carolina label, and Funeral was the first Billboard album it has had. Arcade Fire could of signed with anyone after that and they’ve stayed with Merge. They have integrity and I will defend it to the death. Sorry for ranting.