Over 112 Artists Affected in Sweeping Streaming Song Theft
Since the advent of the streaming market in music, accusations and proven incidents of paid-for streams, fake artists and songs meant to siphon music from the system, and other instances of deceptive, underhanded, or outright illegal activity have been reported on and well-documented. But recently Saving Country Music stumbled upon a situation that appears unprecedented in scope, uniquely brazen in its activity, and directly affects artists, songwriters, and their original material.
Over 112 artists and counting have been confirmed as victims of a sweeping intellectual property theft by having their recordings directly stolen and repurposed by fake artist accounts operating on all major streaming services, including Spotify, Amazon Music, Apple Music, Google Play, YouTube, and others. The theft includes at least 831 total songs, of which 673 Saving Country Music has been able to identify. The stolen songs on the fake accounts have received in excess of 5 millions streams, and are generating an estimated $1,500 a week for the fraudsters.
A total of 24 confirmed fake artist accounts are responsible for the theft, though many more accounts are suspected of being fake, while the system implemented by these fake accounts could be easily replicated under the current streaming model, meaning hundreds, or possibly thousands of similar accounts could exist, funneling money from streaming service subscriptions away from artists to fraudulent third parties.
The vast majority of the tracks and fake accounts are still currently live at the time of posting. To see all the artists affected, all the names of the fake accounts, as well as a statistical breakdown of the stolen tracks, and a catalog of which specific songs were stolen from each artist, check out Sweeping Stream Song Theft: The Data.
– – – – – – –
The rash of fake accounts was first discovered when fans of Canadian country & Western performer Colter Wall noticed that a live version of his rendition of the traditional cowboy song “I Ride Old Paint” appeared in their Discovery Weekly playlists around December 16th, 2019. It was clearly Colter Wall singing, but instead of Colter’s name coming up in the playlist, the track was attributed to an artist named Jason Dover.
But that wasn’t the only song from Jason Dover that belonged to Colter Wall. Four songs taken from a Colter Wall Daytrotter session recorded in March 29th, 2018 were included on a record credited to Jason Dover called Never Come Back first posted to streaming platforms on August 6th 2019. Six other unidentified songs were also on Never Come Back. As soon as Colter Wall’s management was notified about the theft of his tracks by the Jason Dover account, they initiated the process to have the album pulled.
But this turned out to just be the beginning. Even with the removal of the Jason Dover Never Come Back album, the fake account was still allowed to remain live with two other albums containing copyrighted material from other artists. An album entitled Big Escape included five original songs taken from albums of the Austin-based Texas music band The Statesboro Revue. Another 13-song album from Jason Dover called New Step consisted entirely of songs from a Texas-based Christian country singer named John Randolph.
This revelation in itself seemed to illustrate one of the most brazen examples of fraud within the streaming market, and an unprecedented instance of intellectual property theft. But again, this was just scratching the surface. Utilizing the “Fans Also Like” feature on the Jason Dover Spotify account, eventually 24 more fake accounts were revealed via universal signifiers contained on each account, and then verified by using the Shazam application to identify songs. Other songs were identified by cross-referencing track information via other sources when the stolen songs were not currently available through streaming services, or when they came from organizations such as Daytrotter, Noisetrade, or Paste Studios (now all under the Paste umbrella).
All of the fake streaming accounts also used the image generation program “Canva” to create the cover art for these records. This aided in their discovery and identification, and corroborates that the fake accounts could all be from the same individual or group of individuals. Also, each fake account released all the albums from the individual artist on the same day, and all the albums and songs were distributed through DistroKid—a self-service platform that allows independent artists to distribute their music online.
Only one of the 24 fake accounts includes just one album. Most include two or three, and a few include four albums of re-purposed songs. Many include the stolen songs of different artist in random order, some switching genres mid album. None of the fake account names have any other internet presence in music, meaning no social media accounts or websites can be located for these artists, no tour dates, or other identifiers that would refute they are fake. Many of the albums were released during the summer of 2019, but some have been uploaded as recently as December.
Each of the 112 artists who’ve been identified as having work stolen had at least two songs taken, but some had many more. Los Angeles-based acoustic pop artist Katrina Stone had 26 songs taken, and Ohio-based folk artist Charlie Mosbrook had 23. And the issue goes well beyond the country and roots world. Though well-known Texas country artist Rich O’Toole is part of the theft, as is the CMA-nominated former Steel Magnolia member and The Voice contestant Meghan Linsey, there are jazz, rock, and pop artists, EDM artists, as well as a full album of instrumental tracks.
And none of this accounts for the songwriters on the stolen songs, or other content creators who contributed to the repurposed tracks. Though most of the songs taken were original studio recordings that were released professionally, there are 47 total songs taken from Daytrotter/Noisetrade/Paste Studios sessions where artists performed live versions of songs, or cover songs from other artists.
There are also some tracks that sound like they were recorded by amateurs on smartphones, or songs that perhaps were demo or scratch tracks. In this specific cross section of stolen tracks, you can find songs originally written or recorded by the likes of Taylor Swift, Adele, Shania Twain, Coldplay, Michelle Branch, Ingrid Michaelson, Sixpence None The Richer, and Vertical Horizon. Considering these tracks are still earning revenue for the fake account holders despite the crude nature of the recordings, this adds an entirely new dimension to the amount of artists affected by the fraud, while upping the ante in the name-recognition of the performers who’ve been injured in the fraud.
And despite the 112 names of artists verified to have songs taken, there are still 158 songs from artists Saving Country Music was unable to identify, meaning there are more victims out there yet to be identified. There are also six accounts of hip-hop songs that also appear to be fake, as well as an acoustic album. If these accounts prove to be fake as well, this would add another 216 stolen songs for a total of 1,047.
Again, to see all the data from the investigation, check out Sweeping Stream Song Theft: The Data.
– – – – – – –
Ultimately, the point of stealing the tracks is to generate revenue for an end account holder, which in the instance of these fake accounts, was working through a DistroKid account. Then the tracks received plays through streaming mechanisms or by being loaded into playlists for revenue to be generated. Just from the 24 confirmed fake accounts Saving Country Music discovered, the stolen songs were receiving enough streams to generate and estimated $1,500 a week, or $75,000 a year. All the fake accounts came up in groups through the recommended artist features on services like Spotify and Amazon Unlimited due to the same fake listener accounts playing the same fake artist accounts. So even though the music on the fake accounts was of a wide variety, all the fake accounts were linked in the streaming services as being similar.
When Saving Country Music reached out to songwriter and performer Katrina Stone about the theft of her tracks, she was also currently looking into the fraud. Similar to the experience of country artist Colter Wall, she was tipped off to the stolen songs through fans hearing her music through Spotify’s Discovery Weekly feature, meaning stolen songs are actively being promoted and receiving streams via special features on these streaming services, not just automatically by bots. This is also one of the few ways artists or the public can be tipped off to their existence. Otherwise they would never be found since artists, managers, and labels don’t know how to search for them, and the track names don’t always align with the original song.
“I reached out to Spotify, Apple, and Amazon, and they would not help me. They were just too big,” Katrina Stone says. “I had the burden of proof. To put in 26 copyright claims, one per song per streaming site would take forever. So I just went to the source. I reached out to DistroKid, and they opened an inquiry, discovered that all the music was mine, and then they said it would be down in about a week.”
Katrina Stone successfully had the 26 tracks stolen from her removed earlier this week, but since they were originally posted on June 20th, 2019, it means that revenue had been generated by someone else using her songs for 7 1/2 months before it was resolved. And even though she’s one of the few artists who discovered the theft and the songs have now been taken down, there’s no guarantee it won’t happen again.
“There’s nothing really stopping them,” Stone explains. “Even though my stuff was just pulled, they could upload it today under a different name, and I wouldn’t be able to find it. There’s no way for me to search for it. And who does the responsibility fall on? DistroKid makes you click a little box that says, ‘I acknowledge that this work is 100% my own.’ But you can just lie, and then they don’t have any responsibility anymore. Meanwhile streaming services are trusting these distributors. I asked if there was anything DistroKid could do in the future about this, and they said that each streaming platform individually would have to have some sort of algorithm like YouTube has that will screen for preexisting music, and they don’t. So it’s just going to keep happening.”
However most of the stolen tracks are all still being serviced on YouTube as well, which claims to have safeguards in place meant to protect creators and copyright holders.
“I am as independent as you can get. 100%,” Katrina Stone continues. “If I spend all of my time doing this stuff, I can’t make music anymore. Trying to track all this down, it’s just a legal nightmare. And so I just have to have them keep taking it down, and know that my stuff is going to get stolen.”
DistroKid did reach out to the person responsible for the theft. Saving Country Music is currently investigating the legal implications and ramifications of the stolen songs, and will report on that side of the story at a future date. Artists who’ve had their music stolen are encouraged to reach out to DistroKid to try and get the music taken down as opposed to reaching out to the streaming services.
– – – – – – – –
The brazenness and expansiveness of this theft of songs, along with the difficulty of discovering it, and the ability for thieves to easily replicate the system due to the lack of formal protocols or algorithms in place to verify the ownership of songs is what is so disturbing about this story for both musicians and their fans.
The technology to identify the originator of a given music track already exists. The free Shazam app was the primary way Saving Country Music was able to quickly and easily identifymany of the stolen tracks, and who the original owner was. Algorithmic information from tracks provided through organizations like Daytrotter, Noisetrade, NPR’s Tiny Desk, and other free music providers could also be added to this database to safeguard against these caches of music being redistributed for profit.
But until there is regulation or an industry consensus to work to protect creators and their songwriting collaborators, there is no reason to believe the theft of music won’t continue on a grand scale. It’s also a good bet that the fake accounts and stolen songs discovered by Saving Country Music is just the tip of the iceberg of what is out there on the streaming services already, siphoning revenue away from artists as we speak.
– – – – – – –
NOTE: If you are an artist whose music has been affected by the fraud, please feel free to reach out to Saving Country Music via the Contact Forum.
Gabe
January 9, 2020 @ 11:12 am
Wow, mind blowing facts, never been a fan of streaming, this is just more incentive to stay away. Keep up the good work!
Trey
January 9, 2020 @ 11:22 am
Great job man and thanks so much for the heads up!
Colter
January 9, 2020 @ 11:35 am
Fuck streaming and fuck thieves.
hoptowntiger94
January 9, 2020 @ 2:19 pm
What other sources are there to consume music?
Colter
January 9, 2020 @ 2:47 pm
You can buy it and download it.
hoptowntiger94
January 9, 2020 @ 3:15 pm
But aren’t mp3s going away? I’ve already encountered streaming only releases the past two years. I expect eventually mp3s will be as obsolete as physical product.
Colter
January 9, 2020 @ 3:21 pm
I’m not sure about that. I buy pretty much every album on vinyl and probably 9 out of 10 of them include a free download card. And if you buy the record on Amazon they usually give you a free download with it anyway.
Mnnvint
August 9, 2020 @ 6:17 am
Watch out there! Buy and download services are just as vulnerable to this as streaming services.
For instance an old friend of mine who is a moderately successful jazz guitarist in my country, found that she had a copycat account on bandcamp, someone pretending to be her and having uploaded her albums and songs. Bandcamp shows who’s bought the records, so she could see for herself that hundreds of fans had paid the spammer in the belief that they were supporting her. (I can give the artist’s name to Saving Country Music if you’re interested in saving Norwegian Jazz as well… just mail me)
I also recently found a spam album on iTunes, and Amazon (which also operates on a buy-and-download model) seems to have every spam album in existence.
Hey Arnold
January 9, 2020 @ 12:00 pm
What’s everyone’s thoughts on the YouTube mp3 converter? Taking songs via YouTube and converting them into a mp3 media file & placing it into your itunes library. It’s a thing & it’s been happening for years. Is that illegal? Asking for a friend…
Rachel Hurley
January 9, 2020 @ 12:08 pm
it is, in fact, illegal.
Hey Arnold
January 9, 2020 @ 12:28 pm
I only use it for old old songs that aren’t available on itunes or on major streaming sites… like old 50s DooWop. But everything else I buy or pay to stream!
Steve
January 9, 2020 @ 12:29 pm
An artist gets a ridiculously small amount of money from one play on YouTube. You are basically paying .00002 dollars (possibly 0) to your favorite artist for a forever copy of the song. It should be forced to be taken down but YouTube doesn’t give a shit.
WPSP
January 9, 2020 @ 12:46 pm
I think the issue with the YouTube mp3 converter is a little complicated. I’ve know individuals who have used the tools to download out of print music for artists and songwriters who have passed away and whose music is not available on any streaming platform. Would copyright infringement issues for YouTube mp3 converters be in line with posting the music on YouTube in the first place? I’d assume there is no financial gain for any party.
Matt F.
January 9, 2020 @ 12:14 pm
Of all the artists to steal from, Colter Wall? There’s no one with a more distinctive voice.
Trig, your days must have 28 hours and your weeks must be 8 days. I don’t know how you had time to do this investigation while you’ve been publishing two items every day. Maybe you have a squad of elves? Thanks, as always, for all you do.
JF
January 9, 2020 @ 12:51 pm
C’mon, streaming is the best thing to happen to the music fan since the invention of the victrola. You can’t condemn streaming because of this (directed @ posters above, not this story). People scam tickets to shows and no one says we should stop live music. Condemn the scammers — they suck. Sure, Spotify should do more to police this.
My music spending has dramatically increased since Spotify came around. Apart from my annual fees, I buy tons of vinyl direct from the artist. Plus buy all kinds of merch and concert tickets from artists I would have never even heard of were it not for streaming. It kicks ass.
Wilson Pick It
January 10, 2020 @ 3:23 pm
Yep, streaming and vinyl is where it’s at. If radio wasn’t total corporate garbage, we could maybe do without streaming, but we all know that ain’t the case.
Greg Green
January 19, 2020 @ 6:24 am
But many aren’t buying copies, they’re just streaming. And the artists are then left with very little.
JW
January 9, 2020 @ 1:03 pm
That is quite a scam… I guess the goal is really to make money by streaming the same songs you published, and the copyright infringement is more of a side effect? I have to say I’m amazed they can make a net profit that way, and if so, what prevents someone from making some original “music” and doing the same thing, with much less chance of it getting noticed.
Trigger
January 9, 2020 @ 1:51 pm
This is a good question. We know of instances in the past of “fake” artists that basically make simple music beds via algorithm, then upload them on streaming networks and try to receive spins. There really is no reason to steal someone else’s work, aside from perhaps if it goes undetected, it may be more likely that people will listen to it organically. But some of the stuff that was stolen is very crude. One album sounds like a high school girl with her iPhone singing Taylor Swift and Adele songs.
Mnnvint
August 9, 2020 @ 6:24 am
I often stream a song on YouTube for convenience, even when I’ve bought the track on Bandcamp AND have access to it on a subscription streaming service. Is it really fair to say the artist is losing money on me then?
I take responsibility for helping the artists I enjoy to survive so they can keep making more music. That they’re paid per play, I don’t care much about.
However, when money I pay to keep my favorite artists alive is diverted to spammers, then I get mad. That’s a problem on a whole another level.
eckiezZ!
January 9, 2020 @ 1:04 pm
How long until another journalist steals Trigger’s work without credit for their own investigative piece?
Trigger
January 9, 2020 @ 1:47 pm
As long as folks link back to this article, I hope others report on this issue. That’s the reason I extrapolated all the data so if other people want to use it, it’s all there for them. This is a major problem, and the more people taking about it, the better.
albert
January 9, 2020 @ 1:15 pm
i’m at a loss to understand why artists agree to let labels license their music for criminally low royalty returns in the first place .if this isn’t a deal with the devil i don’t know what is . WHY would you ?……why aren’t artists banding together in this ? ..possibly starting an artists union policed BY artists to force labels to pay fair compensation . or do away with this method of exposure altogether . i have yet to talk to a writer/artist (whose name isn’t bieber or drake ) who doesn’t feel the same way …….like they are being raped by the streaming system .
but THIS scam is almost unimaginably simple , it seems , for scammers to pull off ….sad as it is , of course .
Convict charlie
January 9, 2020 @ 6:16 pm
Article I read a few years back for major label artists had the label getting 76%, artist 17%, and writer 7% on streaming. That’s for the payment royalties.
TwangBob
January 10, 2020 @ 7:42 am
Yow! I can’t hit Like on that one. Those rates are horrible… especially for the artist and writer. So sad. 🙁
Normal Street
January 9, 2020 @ 1:25 pm
This absolutely stinks! I am of the opinion that artists do not make enough money from streaming anyway, but to have what they do make siphoned off by a thief who doesn’t have a single bit of creativity in them is just disgusting. Thanks for taking the time to do such a detailed investigation and exposing what these ‘people’ have done.
Jerry Clower's Ghost
January 9, 2020 @ 3:06 pm
This is great investigative work, and I do hope the music journalism industry builds on this reporting, because corporations normally don’t move to correct issues with their products until the negative PR is hurting profits.
Streaming isn’t the problem. Streaming is the best thing to happen to music since electrification. All the indie and regional artists who bitch about royalties wouldn’t be getting paid nearly as much without the internet and streaming, and they certainly wouldn’t have as much exposure. There wouldn’t be an independent country and roots music community without the internet and streaming. Go listen to FM radio ONLY for a week, and come back and tell me you hate streaming. We just need to get those greedy Swedes at Spotify to put in the grunt work for coding protective algorithms.
albert
January 9, 2020 @ 4:22 pm
”We just need to get those greedy Swedes at Spotify to put in the grunt work for coding protective algorithms.”….
and PAY for what THEY ( streaming services ) themselves are essentially stealing from artists .
how ’bout a label representing an artist only gets , say , two ‘promotional ( stream-able) songs per album from a given artist to , essentially , give away to streaming services ? this would accomplish several things , to my mind :
1. limit the glut of crappy filler we constantly wade through …no matter the artist or genre .
2. limit the number of tracks an artist records , thus limiting the artist and label overhead .
3. encourage ( force ) listeners to go DIRECTLY to the artists/label site to stream or download more ,if they like the ‘free’ stuff ..but at a REAL PRICE payable to that artist ….not to the catalogue coffers .
4. encourage FAR better songwriting . if you only get to ‘give away’ two loss leaders they had better be able to compete with the two loss leaders every other artist is allowed .
there’s no question artists are getting the shitty end of this streaming business stick . yes you could argue that more indie’s get to put stuff out there but that , by default and averages , just means MORE inferior stuff and undermines the value of the best most creative efforts by all . there will always be acts willing to play a club for a meal and gas money . but that ‘fee’ becomes the norm in a hurry and the best bands with the best players and the toughest work ethics are losers in terms of maintaining economic viability …CAREERS… because of the devaluation of ALL acts . if you want something to remain in demand , you need to limit the supply …..and limit that supply to the BEST available .
there was a time when big move stars weren’t allowed to make any more than a movie every 3-5 years . it forced them to choose the BEST projects available with the best stories , directors and crews and THIS not only kept their stock up but the quality of their work. i think this glut of ‘free’ music means ALL music becomes far less appreciated and listeners become conditioned to the average , by default , nature of the product and the ridiculously low price they pay for it . a person will pay 50-100 dollars and up monthly for a cell phone….well over that for cable TV and internet …but only 10 bucks a month for all the music on the planet . I think its clear that most music artists are being shafted .
Jerry Clower's Ghost
January 9, 2020 @ 4:56 pm
I have to disagree with you on most of what you’re saying. Streaming services are simply the newest medium for artists to use to get their music in the public sphere. It’s no different than 8track, cassette, and cd. Those media had just as many gatekeepers and greedy execs. Also, artists don’t have to put their music on streaming platforms. But even the bigtime artists can’t stay out of the streaming game forever, because that’s what their fans want. Jason Aldean and Taylor Swift are a couple examples of big stars who held out til they got the deal they wanted from Spotify. Ultimately the biggest responsibility for the wider musical community lies with those big acts at the top of the heap who have the clout to make a difference. If enough of them got together and said “Hey we’re not gonna participate anymore until we get a fairer shake for all artists.” then you would see big change.
Limiting the number of tracks an artist can release on a platform makes no sense at all. That strategy reminds of New Deal policies during the Great Depression that tried to raise prices on farm goods by buying and destroying surplus crops. That seems like a formula that would bring all the worst qualities of commercial radio into the streaming sphere. Artists only get a couple “loss leaders” on radio over a given period as well. This also goes against the indie spirit that has thrived on streaming services.
People already go to artists’ websites to get hard copies of albums, so I don’t really understand the advantage of forcing a company to send its customers to another market. That doesn’t make sense for a business to do that.
The limiting of supply is exactly why mainstream music is the way it is. The big media companies pay to develop the most popular and lucrative acts and oftentimes sacrifice quality in the process.
But nothing is going to improve until the top tier acts wipe the dollar signs out of their eyes for the short term to bring the streaming companies to the table and make things better in the long term for everyone.
Cackalack
January 11, 2020 @ 11:10 am
This is a bad comment. Speaking as a regional artist, and as such being very familiar with the economics, you are flat out wrong. Prior to the advent of streaming, an act in our position would be able to count on $10-15k a year in CD sales, most of which would be sold at gigs. That has plummeted, and the $700 we got in streaming revenue doesn’t come close to plugging the hole. And yes, you’re right, it’s way easier for folks to find our music now, but the problem is; while it’s cool that (for instance) four folks in Albuquerque are now listening to our music that otherwise wouldn’t be, there’s no way to effectively monetize that. It’s just too spread out.
While it might be different for a national act, or one of those Soundcloud people that never play live, for us middle-class working bands it’s a big problem. Please quit talking out of your ass.
Jerry Clower's Ghost
January 12, 2020 @ 3:02 pm
The folks in Albuquerque wouldn’t be attending a concert put on by your regional act, so you’re getting more revenue from them than if streaming didnt exist. If you dont like the revenue from streaming, then pull your music from the platforms and sell your shit at your concerts like you were before…
Cackalack
January 13, 2020 @ 8:15 am
Folks under 35 don’t buy CDs anymore hoss, regardless of whether or not the music’s available on Spotify. Most don’t even have the equipment to listen to them. The 48 cents in streaming revenue from New Mexico doesn’t come close to filling the gap. Claiming that “indie and regional artists who bitch about royalties wouldn’t be getting paid nearly as much without the internet and streaming” is A) demonstrably, empirically false, and B) makes you part of the problem. Honest folks shouldn’t make claims in areas in which they have no experience, especially when they’re damaging to other folks’ livelihoods.
Jerry Clower's Ghost
January 13, 2020 @ 2:52 pm
Ok bub, you stick to what you think you know about a completely random person on a commenting section. If people don’t wanna buy your music on disc, then my advice is to put out a better product.
Greg Green
January 19, 2020 @ 6:29 am
You really seem clueless on this. You’re arguing your hypotheticals with someone with real world experience, yet you continue to cling to your hypotheticals. Because the crooked process benefits you.
hoptowntiger94
January 9, 2020 @ 3:12 pm
The music industry has always been corrupt. This reminded me of those “sound alike” CDs/Cassettes in the budget bins we used to stock in Walmart, Kmart, Shopko and Pamida (but in reverse). Best Buy forbid use to stock them in their stores. The compilations would be entitled “80’s Dance Party” or “Classic Country from the 60’s”. The consumer would purchase the CD based on the track list, but when they played the CD (or cassette) it was some unknown, generic person singing the song. We sold a ton of those in Walmart and the margins were high. Consumers would often time return them. Others I think just didn’t care.
But great work exposing the fake artists.
Jerry Clower's Ghost
January 9, 2020 @ 3:15 pm
Ive been using Spotify for years, but i’ve never really paid attention to the “Verified Artist” blue checkmark on the About section for each artist. All of the fake artists listed in this article are verified artists! Wtf??? Is the qualification for the verification the same as what you described about DistroKid’s verification?
Trigger
January 9, 2020 @ 3:23 pm
No, none of the fake artists had blue checkmarks, though a lot of real artists don’t have blue checkmarks, just like on Twitter/Instagram, etc.
Jerry Clower's Ghost
January 9, 2020 @ 3:37 pm
Im looking at your list of Fake Accounts With Albums And Songs. I’ve checked at least 20 of the artists listed on Spotify, and they all have showed a “Verified Artist” blue checkmark that shows on the “About” section pic on the artist main page. When you click the “About” section it just says the monthly listeners. I’m using the mobile app.
Trigger
January 9, 2020 @ 3:43 pm
Huh. Well I was dealing mostly with desktop here, and don’t see any blue checkmarks. I just opened the app on my phone and am still not seeing any blue checkmarks for the fake accounts. Not calling you a liar, I’m just not seeing them, but I am seeing them on Verified accounts. Maybe there’s different software versions of Spotify or something.
Jerry Clower's Ghost
January 9, 2020 @ 3:49 pm
I’m using an Android with the most recent update. Shoot me an email, and I’ll reply with screenshots.
Trigger
January 9, 2020 @ 3:50 pm
trigger at saving country music dot com
Jerry Clower's Ghost
January 9, 2020 @ 3:53 pm
They’re sent.
NJ
January 9, 2020 @ 3:19 pm
Where does something like Dylan Miller on Apple Music fall on the spectrum? He has 22 Garth Brooks tracks as his only output, they sound like covers – all tracks have the name of the song as the cover art.
Brad
January 9, 2020 @ 3:29 pm
Thank you for posting this.
Stringbuzz
January 9, 2020 @ 6:08 pm
I still don’t get it… are they just stumbled upon? People search for the artist album or song and that makes them part of a search result?
Trigger
January 9, 2020 @ 6:26 pm
Many of these fake accounts were around for six months or longer before anyone discovered them. You would never know where to find them, because you would never search for that particular artists, because it’s a fake name. And even if you happened upon them by accident, the accounts look real enough at first glance, and you wouldn’t know that the songs were someone else’s work unless you were intimately aware of the artist whose song it was.
The only way we found out about these accounts is songs from them started to get placed in people’s Discovery Weekly playlists on Spotify. The fake Jason Dover account had been around since August, but when Colter Wall’s Daytrotter version of “I Ride Old Paint” showed up in people’s Discovery Playlists who were Colter Wall fans, they cried foul. That’s how I heard about this. Same goes for Katrina Stone, who had her fans recognize her songs under someone else’s name coming through their Discovery Weekly playlists.
Then using Spotify’s artist recommendation tools, the other fake accounts were discovered.
Marianne
January 9, 2020 @ 6:45 pm
Good investigative reporting. Wouldn’t have thought there was enough money in streaming to make that kind of theft worthwhile.
Sascha
January 10, 2020 @ 3:22 am
I cannot speak for other platforms, but Youtube/Google’s Content ID machine should easily identify the correct rights owners, even if it’s a cover or live version. Usually there’s an according claim on the song and monetizes to the rights holders, i.e. digital distributor or record label.
Bri
January 10, 2020 @ 3:08 pm
This isn’t the first time something like this has happened. I remember a couple years ago a group of scammers made fake 30-second tracks, put them on Spotify playlists, then used fake accounts to stream them on repeat. They made a million dollars in royalties, so it’s a very lucrative scam. Here’s a news story about it: https://qz.com/1212330/a-bulgarian-scheme-scammed-spotify-for-1-million-without-breaking-a-single-law/
Also, I believe this scam is quite common unfortunately, especially targeting smaller artists. I know many other small artists who have had their music stolen and reuploaded under a different name (myself included). Unfortunately, it’s very easy to get away with doing that, especially if the artist doesn’t have a very big fanbase, makes instrumental tracks, or isn’t on Spotify/Shazam. Streaming services need to do better in order to stop scammers 🙁
Trigger
January 10, 2020 @ 3:14 pm
The difference here and what makes this unprecedented is that they music they used for their scheme comes from other artists and in many instances is copyright protected. Anyone can make a 30-second sound snippet and upload it to streaming sites, as long as it’s not infringing on anyone’s work. Generating fake streams would be where the fraud is similar.
Hal Drury
January 15, 2020 @ 10:13 am
It’s worth saying that Pitchfork had a look at similar issues back in August, although mostly focusing on rap/r&b because that’s what they do. It may be that these guys are copying those, or it could be the same people moving on to smaller but greener fields to exploit. It looks like a problem that’s oging to stick around, unfortunately.
https://pitchfork.com/features/article/how-artist-imposters-and-fake-songs-sneak-onto-streaming-services/
Mary K.
January 17, 2020 @ 12:16 am
Thanks again for the investigation into this and for getting the info out there. I was wondering about a lot of the issues brought up in previous comments. Were these Song Theft Scammers also experts at Spotify P.R. and Playlists, or conducting a second scam to get more plays (with fake listener accounts ) ? The amount of plays & income generated is much higher than that of many Musicians I know, or have read about. I think it’s interesting that these Fake Artists could generate income while having no social media accounts or online presence. So complicated now!
Trigger
January 17, 2020 @ 10:08 am
There appears to be a second scam in place that is sending spins to the stolen songs to rack up revenue for the fake accounts. That is the reason all the fake accounts came up in bunches in the “Artists You Might Also Like” features on streaming services, because you had the same machines playing the same artists, despite the styles being wildly diverse. However, these songs were also populating on playlists, so they were getting extra spins that way as well.
Jack Miller
January 17, 2020 @ 10:00 am
AND THIS IS WHY YOU DON’T USE CRAPPY DISTOKID! They should be held fully responsible for letting these tracks go out.
Greg Green
January 19, 2020 @ 6:32 am
On the other hand they were responsive to complaints. The bigger companies weren’t. Amazing that this is so obviously wrong but the artist couldn’t get the attention of the large companies.