Song Review – Sturgill Simpson’s “In Bloom” (Nirvana Cover)
It has been said often about country music, and about popular music in general, that we need a “Nirvana moment”—meaning a point in time when everything we know about music is turned upside down, and an era of more authentic and raw expressions is ushered into the popular culture. But this theory has always involved a bit of revisionism and myopic perspective. Just like Hank Williams, just like Townes Van Zandt, the tragic and poetic death of Kurt Cobain has inexorably skewed our perspective on his influence and importance in popular culture.
Nevermind wasn’t even Nirvana’s first record, and it’s popularity was preceded, paralleled, and eventually bested by Pearl Jam’s Ten, and was bolstered by a crowd of other grunge artists who were also important to the revolution in popular music at that time. 1991 wasn’t just the story of one man, one song, one band, or one album. Undoubtedly, Kurt Cobain and Nirvana were incredibly important to what happened to popular music in the early 90’s, but we’re always looking for just one, when many are usually to blame.
There seems to be something intuitive to the human design to expect all of the ills of society to be resolved by one person, whether that’s a popular music artist, a Presidential candidate, or a Messiah busting through the clouds to usher in the rapture. And so as creatures of habit, we take burdens, many of which would be more fairly assigned to our own shoulders or the shoulders of many, and lump them onto this one person. Or we assign the absolution for all previous burdens to a cult of personality figure from the past.
This leads us all to Sturgill Simpson, whom many have compared to that biblical “Country Music Savior” or modern day Kurt Cobain that could come in and so completely reshape the current music paradigm, it would usher in an entirely new era of substantive entertainment that would be lasting for generations and save us all from the current scourge of simplistic pap. And here Sturgill goes cutting a Nirvana song. Without hearing a peep of it, that in itself seems poetic, or maybe even prophetic. Right?
What was Nirvana’s album Nevermind about? What was “Smells Like Teen Spirit” trying to say, and even more specifically “In Bloom,” which is the song Sturgill has selected to cover? “In Bloom” was Nirvana spilling its frustration on how the message they were trying to convey through their music was being lost on its audience. Their ideology was being diluted by the sheer number of people it was reaching. They were fed up that a portion, or even a majority of Nirvana’s “fans” were just there for the scene that had been created around the music, or the blood and guts and rawness of it all. They were tired of people assigning their own desires to what the music was saying instead of trying to interpret what the band was really trying to convey.
“But he don’t know what it means, knows not what it means…” the song says. In fact this premise of misunderstanding is echoed throughout Nirvana’s Nevermind, including in the more well-recognized “Smells Like Teen Spirit,” and is embodied in the title “Nevermind,” which is the band acknowledging that their message was being lost, misinterpreted, or downright ignored as come-a-long grunge fans banged their heads to the beat mindlessly.
The premise of “In Bloom” is quietly brilliant, and the more the song and Nirvana became misunderstood (including how society assigned hero status to Cobain), the more brilliant it became. But whether it is Nirvana’s version, or Sturgill Simpson’s version, “In Bloom” is an indictment of ones own fans, and is based in part on judgement and assumption. Sturgill gives the song a slight twist by adding the addendum, “But he don’t know what it means, knows not what it means…to love someone,” but despite the more bright feel of the music of Sturgill’s version, the message remains the same.
“Here we are now, entertain us,” was what accompanied the release of Sturgill’s “In Bloom” song and video Thursday (3-24) on social media—another indictment Nirvana thrust towards its fans in song, and was misunderstood by many. Even today, we see headlines talking about Sturgill’s version as being “happy,” or even “uplifting.” But at the core of “In Bloom,” is a level of judgement, however true it might be for some indolent fans. There’s nothing happy or uplifting about it.
At a show at the Ryman Auditorium last November, Sturgill had to help break up a fight from the stage and said, “I can’t wait ’til all these flannel shirt/beard motherfuckers figure out I ain’t like them.” Has this entire move by Sturgill to slowly extricate himself from the sonic burdens of country music been just as much about expanding his creative possibilities as it’s been to push back on the public perception of who he is, and how he should be assigned as a “savior,” which is the same motion that defined Kurt Cobain throughout his short career?
Just like Kurt Cobain, Sturgill Simpson has been hounded by the prevalence of misunderstanding. In the press, in the population of his fans, there are thousands that have shown up just to be a part of the scene, while the message, and even the style of Sturgill’s music passes well above their heads. There’s the Waylon Jennings comparisons, there’s references to his songs as “drug music,” even though this applies to one, maybe two songs, and even these are just passing references, and not the condoning of anything. But more importantly, there’s the lumping of responsibility on Sturgill to be a country music savior, to save popular music just like Kurt did, and the expectation to criticize other current country artists. Perhaps all of this has become buried in Sturgill’s psyche, and is now being expressed through his music.
Covering Nirvana’s “In Bloom” is two parts brilliant, but it’s one part troubling. Judgement is a two way street, and can come to the stage, and from the stage. How do we know that the villain of “In Bloom” doesn’t know how to love someone?
All of this information, and what “In Bloom” is trying to say, is critically vital to understanding this song. At its core, “In Bloom” is enigmatic, and necessitates analyzing and placing in context for one to be immersed in the full experience. Otherwise, you become the song’s dupe. And “In Bloom” needs dupes to be effective.
But brushing that all aside, what do we have with Sturgill’s version of “In Bloom”? First, this song says something, and it goes somewhere, both sonically and lyrically, which is a good sign after the slightly meandering “Brace For Impact.” Though it may seem ironic, “In Bloom” is decidedly a more country-sounding song than the previous two Sturgill song releases. The steel guitar sounds like a steel guitar, and just like Sturgill did with a previous cover—“The Promise” by When in Rome—his use of vocal dynamics is how he adroitly makes the song his own.
READ: Song Review Sturgill Simpson’s “Brace For Impact (Live A Little)”
The concern about how horns would integrate into Sturgill’s music is rendered almost superfluous by the time they actually show up in “In Bloom.” In fact it would feel sinister if they were removed. Same goes for the strings, and other accoutrements that some might consider “non county,” which aid to the incredibly dreamy and ethereal landscape Sturgill creates both as singer and producer. Though it’s fair to point out that as a cover, this song is more interpretive than original, the effort is no less valiant.
All this talk of genre has it all wrong with Sturgill Simpson. Genre is still incredibly important, but it’s not the only concern of music. Good music defines genre, but great music transcends it.
Popular society foisted all of its hopes, burdens, and concerns on the shoulders of Kurt Cobain, just as it had on the shoulders of Hank Williams, Elvis Presley, Michael Jackson, and others. And it was a mistake every time that aided to these transcendental artist’s ultimate demise. In the end the task of the singer is to sing, and the task of the audience is to listen. It just happens to be that the message of “In Bloom” is worth repeating, now more than ever.
Two guns up.
(since I like to shoot my guns)
– – – – – – – – – –
Jim
March 24, 2016 @ 12:32 pm
I know you’ve talked about Sturgill pretty often on this site, but most of what I heard of his never really grabbed me. I thought this was tremendous though. The horns at the end were great. Everything. Ironic, I guess I am now one of those scene people you’re complaining about, lol.
MikeP
March 24, 2016 @ 12:33 pm
I’ve seen some polarizing sentiments about this song pop up in my news feed… All the while since seeing it on the tracklist, attempted to wrap my brain around how he’d tackle the song.
I really enjoyed it. And echo that my fears surrounding the horns being laid to rest.
63guild
March 24, 2016 @ 12:35 pm
Hell of a review Trig and I thought the same when i first gave this a listen with the horns, country sound, vocals, etc. His voice in this is haunting to me. Ready for the rest of the album more than ever
Dallas bowlin
March 24, 2016 @ 12:36 pm
Love sturgill, but these past two songs do nothing for me.
S.
March 24, 2016 @ 12:39 pm
Hey, the song got taken down for copyright.
Jody
March 24, 2016 @ 12:58 pm
It’s such an iconic song that I would have preferred the lyrics not be changed.
Stephanie
March 24, 2016 @ 1:01 pm
Can someone enlighten me a bit on the “flannel shirt / beard motherfuckers” comment by Sturgill?
I live in WI, and if you’re around Madison / Milwaukee / Chicago, the bearded guys in flannel are all total hipsters (or gay men.) But then if you get up into other parts of the state, that description encompasses a different demographic. And I’m wondering if down South its something else entirely.
Anyone have a better read on this?
Acca Dacca
March 24, 2016 @ 1:10 pm
I think he meant rabble-rousing rednecks, myself. I picture that type being more apt to fight than a group of hipsters (unless of course you burn a copy of Pet Sounds or something). Sturgill wants to be seen as “intelligent” music now, so he’s disassociating himself from what he feels is the general country music scene.
Fenton
March 24, 2016 @ 1:21 pm
Oh, is that what he’s doing?
Acca Dacca
March 24, 2016 @ 1:29 pm
Perhaps. If you have the facts and I’m wrong, do let me know.
Fenton
March 24, 2016 @ 2:40 pm
Facts have no place here.
Big Black Richard
March 24, 2016 @ 1:40 pm
I was at the concert in question. I’m pretty sure it was a particularly bro-ey group of hipsters that got chucked out. Nashville is full of them.
Not sure about the rest yet. Waiting to hear the album.
BwareDWare94
March 24, 2016 @ 2:29 pm
I disagree. I think definitely think he means that hipster crowd, the crowd that’s using his artistic expression to validate themselves as opposed to being a student of the music and understanding the things he stands for, and what makes him great, creatively. That sounds more like a hipster to me than some backwoods redneck. Are rednecks more likely to fight? Sure, but there are a lot of masculinity-challenged, aggressive hipsters out there. They don’t know who they are so they’re dressing to make themselves noticeable, and growing 1920s beards to be absolutely positive that they’ll look like jackasses (seriously, who uses beard oil?). They are quite simply the most obnoxious men on the planet, and if I could wipe away this whole trend with the snap of my fingers, you’re damn right I would.
I do not like that Sturgill generalized like that, though. Those of us in the northern Midwest look like that because it’s fucking cold, man. Not everybody with a beard and a flannel shirt is some dipshit who doesn’t even know how to change a flat.
Cool Lester Smooth
March 24, 2016 @ 4:50 pm
Yeah, a guy with Sturgill’s NPR audience saying “flannel shirts and beards” 100% means hipsters with douchey “disconnected undercuts.”
Hawkeye Hank
March 24, 2016 @ 6:05 pm
If you watch the video of the fight at The Ryman its pretty obvious what type of people that got thrown out. It definitely wasn’t hipsters, tho they’re douches too.
Mike
April 23, 2016 @ 11:35 am
Uh….beards were definitely out of style in 1920’s…..try the 1890’s.
ElectricOutcast
March 24, 2016 @ 1:29 pm
Some drunks were getting into a fight at the Ryman and it got everybody and Sturgill a little understandably angry.
Stephanie
March 24, 2016 @ 1:34 pm
Yeah, I went back and re-read that article and it’s comments. I still don’t QUITE grasp exactly what he’s trying to say. But I guess he was referring to rednecks and not hipsters. See, in my (admittedly limited) experience, the rabble rousing rednecks I know have never even heard of Sturgill. So I didn’t realize he’d have to be disassociating himself from them.
Acca Dacca
March 24, 2016 @ 1:42 pm
I might very well be wrong, Stephanie. The storm around Sturgill’s decision or not-decision to jump ship is causing me to turn bitter, and I was never that big a fan anyway.
Cool Lester Smooth
March 24, 2016 @ 4:51 pm
I think you’re 100% right. In Nashville especially, it’s going to be 24 year old hipsters.
Jake W
March 25, 2016 @ 7:01 am
You know human nature, he probably looked at one of them or all of them registered a trait and said something without thinking just like any normal person would do. Cause if he had time to think about it he would have said wait i wear flannel shirts and have a beard and I might even be a little like these guys better not paint myself into a corner. I have noticed some arrogant and elitist behavior from him besides this. The Waylon remarks, who gets mad at a compliment. Not like you are not on some level partially intentionally trying to sound like him. Sturgill does make badass music, has a great voice, plays the shit out of the guitar, but he ain’t e first to do what he s doing just the most recent.
Brett
March 24, 2016 @ 1:02 pm
This is a well-done critique, and I can’t say I disagree with anything you’ve written here. But I also can’t say the song really does anything for me. Just not my style.
Peter_Caixas
March 25, 2016 @ 12:44 pm
Yea the idea was cool but i really cant see myself playing it going to or leaving ftom work. I’m scratching my head on what the hell he meant by that comment. I have a beard, sometimes I wear flannels. What gives lmao?
Peter_Caixas
March 25, 2016 @ 12:48 pm
I”™m scratching my head on what the hell he meant by that comment. I have a beard, sometimes I wear flannels. What gives lmao?
Bill Goodman
March 24, 2016 @ 1:07 pm
I like it. It’s different. Sturgill wasn’t trying to remake the song to be like Nirvana, only to do it his way. Well done.
Acca Dacca
March 24, 2016 @ 1:08 pm
Great review. I like how you addressed Nirvana equally with Sturgill and drew that striking parallel between him and Cobain. It should be noted, though, that Cobain’s most quoted issue with Nirvana’s fanbase was his fear that he would lose his underground street cred for being too mainstream, which is basically hipsterism before that was a thing. And I still don’t get all of this interpreting that’s done of Cobain’s lyrics. Did he have a point with some of his songs? Yes. But the man himself said they were unimportant to him and mostly based on a rhyming structure more than anything else. “Smells Like Teen Spirit” might have an ultimate point, but to get there one has to wade through a bunch of words that have no correlation, all sung with that intolerable heroin-induced slur and rasp by Cobain. And I don’t buy that “the point is there is no point” garbage counterculture defense of inane lyrics.
Kurt might have “saved” rock & roll but the salvation was short-lived. There’s a reason why rock is no longer a viable mainstream entity and every band writes downtuned angry/depressed music these days, and that’s thanks to Mr. Cobain. He purified the water but also cut it off from the stream, thus it has stagnated. I’ve expressed my opinion that many of the so-called “post-grunge” bands are given a bad rap for unreasonable factors, but the fact that the genre is still essentially stuck in the same cesspool says something.
Forgive the soapbox, but I’ve yet to listen and I’m fairly certain my deep-seated distaste for the originating band will color my feelings on it, not to mention the fact that Sturgill has never been one of my favorites to begin with (and I’m also more of an album guy, anyways). I guess I’ll find out come April.
In other news, AC/DC is apparently hiring Axl Rose as frontman after unceremoniously canning Brian Johnson (frontman for 36 years) because he was advised to take a break from touring by his doctor. And I’m pissed.
sbach66
March 24, 2016 @ 1:24 pm
Regarding the last line of your post: you should be. That’s a got-dam travesty. Glad I got to see them on the Black Ice tour when Malcolm was still around as well.
Acca Dacca
March 24, 2016 @ 1:38 pm
I love him and am thankful for his role in the band, but I could have lived without Malcolm. Stevie has filled in for him before and I couldn’t even tell it wasn’t Malcolm on Rock or Bust; Stevie channels him that well. But then Phil Rudd lost his mind and started conspiring to kill people, so he got sacked. And now Brian is being replaced, at least for this tour (the band have suspiciously hesitated to comment on his future with the band as a whole). But I consider Brian more integral to the band than Malcolm. He’s the other face, right behind Angus. At this point it’s looking like AC/DC is going to turn into one of those bands like Lynyrd Skynyrd and (until recently) Guns N’ Roses that’s only recognizable in name only. Ironic that they’ve apparently hired the man responsible for that situation with the latter. I’m aware that Brian wasn’t the original frontman (and neither was Bon Scott), but the only reason he’s in the band is because Bon died. The band displayed chivalry in keeping Brian around for the late-’80s, early-’90s period in which his voice was shot and he sounded freaking terrible. But since he needed some time off he’s fired? And here I thought you had some integrity, Angus (I bet Malcolm would have waited for Johnson).
My theory is that Angus is having a mid-life band crisis. His brother retiring due to dementia, drummer getting embroiled in legal issues and singer expressing that he needs to take a break for health reasons has to be a lot to deal with in two years’ time. I think he’s afraid the ride is coming to an end, which is fueling his desire to continue without key members. Malcolm and Phil are inescapable losses, but as I understand it Brian just needs a few months to recuperate and he’ll be okay to resume. You can’t wait for that, Angus, even for business reasons? Nevermind your friendship or anything silly like that.
Henning Furbach
March 25, 2016 @ 1:04 am
I’m guessing here, but surely there are also contracts to be fulfilled? “Business reasons” looks petty on paper, but If there’s a tour already booked, there are many many millions of dollars and piles of contracts involved. Sure ACDC have made a lot of money in their lifetime, but who could or want to miss out on that? Who knows how many contractors and promoters ACDC have to compensate if the tour does not happen? If Brian is physically not able to show up and ACDC are trying to not have to cancel, they could not just replace him with any able Heavy Metal singer without letting down their fans. It would take a star of Axl Rose calibre for the tour to still be accepted as an event.
the pistolero
March 26, 2016 @ 7:25 am
It would take a star of Axl Rose calibre for the tour to still be accepted as an event.
Yeah, and that sucks, because I’m rather skeptical when it comes to Axl’s ability to sing those AC/DC songs the way they’re meant to be sung. I could be all wet ”” I stopped listening after Use Your Illusion II ”” but as far as I can tell, pretty much the only singer alive who could fill Brian Johnson’s shoes vocally would be either Mark Tornillo or maybe Udo Dirkschneider.
Stephanie
March 24, 2016 @ 1:31 pm
I suspected you’d have a comment here as soon as I saw the article talk in any depth about Nirvana. 🙂
Cobain really was an early hipster, wasn’t he?
I’m pretty sure I was the only teen in at least a hundred miles who didn’t really love Nirvana in the 90s, (or Pearl Jam for that matter.) So I guess I was even more hip! (I’m kidding. I have never been cool.)
Acca Dacca
March 24, 2016 @ 1:40 pm
*And there was a rolling of eyes as Acca Dacca took to his keyboard.*
I admit, this is one of my hot-button topics that doesn’t take much to get me going on. But considering how much I’ve ranted about Nirvana around here on articles where they’re completely irrelevant or only partially on topic, surely I’d chime in when they’re a core subject 🙂 . And I’m not cool either, but my fiance is hot so I hope that’ll offset my deficiencies a bit 😛
Stephanie
March 24, 2016 @ 1:45 pm
No I appreciate your sentiment. I don’t feel nearly as strongly, but overall I agree with your opinion on the matter.
Scotty J
March 24, 2016 @ 2:13 pm
Not sure I see Cobain as an early hipster. I grew up in the same area as Cobain and he was 5-6 years older than me but I know a few people that knew him pre-fame and he seems to lack a lot of the arrogance that I associate with hipsterism. He came from a pretty messed up family and was in many ways a non entity as a kid. I just think his issues with fame came from that in many ways as he was always an outsider and then huge fame came his way and it seems people’s focus on him totally changed. Novoselic on the other hand always struck me as a hipster.
And I’m not really a Nirvana fan as I was much more of an Alice In Chains and Soundgarden fan but it can’t be overstated the impact that Nirvana had in a slightly different way than the other members of the Seattle Big 4. They were not as accessible lyrically as the others and more open to interpretation as this article shows. This added a mystery to them that the others didn’t have as much.
Acca Dacca
March 24, 2016 @ 2:40 pm
Touche. And we’re in the same boat on Alice In Chains and Soundgarden (my two favorites of the Big 4). However, I don’t think Soundgarden’s lyrics are that accessible at all, at least not certain songs. But they also don’t have the tendency to resort to rhyming non sequiturs like Nirvana or political gibberish like Pearl Jam. If it helps to inform my opinion, I have more of a problem with Cobain’s deification than I do the man himself. Same goes for John Lennon and certain others.
EDIT: I think his bashing of Pearl Jam, Stone Temple Pilots, Guns N’ Roses and other bands because they weren’t anti-mainstream and such is hipster-like. That’s pretty arrogant in my eyes.
Scotty J
March 24, 2016 @ 3:05 pm
Good points. Trigger mentioned this in the article that Cobain is looked at the way he is because he died young as did Lennon (I’m getting old 40 is now young to me) and I’ve always been a much bigger fan of McCartney’s solo material anyway. As for his hipsterism and maybe I’m just splitting hairs but I think Cobain was coming at things as that wounded outsider as opposed to what I think of as the arrogant cooler than thou hipster of today. End result may be the same but I think he is of a different breed.
As for Soundgarden you are right about some of their lyrics and I might overlook that as they seem to be a more traditional rock band with the power front man and the big guitars.
An example of those lyrics would be my favorite Soundgarden song ‘Outshined’ which features a line I still use occasionally because it is so descriptive. ‘Looking California and feeling Minnesota’. Love that. Along with ‘Hunger Strike’ by Temple Of The Dog (Cornell and Vedder sharing lead weee!!!) ‘Outshined’ may be my favorite song from that era of Seattle music which was right at the beginning when all these bands were beginning to break big.
ShadeGrown
March 24, 2016 @ 6:02 pm
Put me in the camp with Alice and Soundgarden being better than Nirvana. To me they were the worst of the Big Four from Seattle. I still like them but man are they overrated!
mattdangerously
March 24, 2016 @ 7:51 pm
Cobain wasn’t anti-mainstream. He wanted Nirvana to be a mainstream band, otherwise they never would have left Sub Pop. His issues were with bands that placed fame ahead of creating good art, which is why he disliked Pearl Jam. He thought Stone Gossard and Jeff Ament were too concerned with making a career out of being rock stars. Cobain became friendly with Eddie Vedder once he realized Vedder was earnest about his music.
Acca Dacca
March 24, 2016 @ 8:16 pm
@Scotty J
Same with Jim Morrison, Jimi Hendrix, Skynyrd, etc. I’m not saying there’s necessarily anything wrong with the trend, I just think it snuffs out the honesty of any given appraisal of an artist. As Trigger said, it wasn’t just Kurt Cobain or Nirvana that broke grunge into the mainstream and killed hair metal, it was a litany of bands and labels. But ask the average person on the street and they’ll describe Cobain as some sort of Jesus figure but couldn’t tell you the names of even one of the other two band members. I do like “Hunger Strike” and “Outshined” as well; I personally prefer Badmotorfinger to Superunknown as Soundgarden’s opus, but that’s just me. As for my favorite product from Seattle, I’d have to say that Alice In Chains’ Dirt is it. Rarely have I loved a concept album from cover to cover like I do that one.
@ShadeGrown
Nirvana and Pearl Jam were much more accessible than Alice In Chains and Soundgarden, so they got bigger. I don’t hate Nirvana per se, I just resent their overblown placement in the canon of music.
@mattdangerously
Huh? Nirvana’s entire reputation was vested in their anti-mainstream stance back when they were active. That’s the reason for a nude baby on the cover of Nevermind. That’s the reason that Cobain is shown flipping off the buyers of the album on the inside art. That’s the reason he cut songs like “In Bloom” where he decried his mainstream fanbase for not understanding his band. That’s the reason Nirvana was punk-inspired hard rock instead of hair metal. The band is such a symbol of counterculture that it’s a cliche (and ironically mainstream at this point).
Don’t confuse mainstream success with mainstream aspirations. Nirvana left Sub Pop because Cobain wasn’t satisfied with the way they were handling the band’s material, not because he wanted some big break.
the pistolero
March 26, 2016 @ 7:35 am
I”™m pretty sure I was the only teen in at least a hundred miles who didn”™t really love Nirvana in the 90s
Well, maybe, unless you were living in Northeast Texas back then. I didn’t like Nirvana when they were new and I don’t like them now. I’ve always thought grunge and alternative in general were dreadfully overrated. To me, pretty much the only Seattle bands from that time period that were worth a shit were Soundgarden and Alice in Chains.
(Well, Queensrÿche too, but of course they were metal as opposed to grunge, and their last really good album was 1990’s Empire. I did like 1994’s Promised Land, but that album is a very, very difficult listen, as it’s essentially the soundtrack to QR’s unraveling as a band.)
Marky Mark
March 25, 2016 @ 2:47 pm
I never understood the whole nirvana hubbub. Nevermind was a good rockin album but it didn’t change my world. I always thought G’n’R’s appetite was the the album that changed things.
I have to think that ac dc / Axl mashup must be an Internet joke. It makes zero sense. I do think axl could have done mad justice to a lot of the AC/DC songs 20+ years ago when he was in his prime, but now, sadly, he’s just old, fat and tired. If axl wants to prove to me that he has anything left in the tank, I suggest he focus on the GnR reunion and cut a new album with slash and Duff, and make it one that shows some artistic effort and integrity(And don’t take 15 years to do it). …and bring back Izzy, it ain’t GNR without izzy stradlin.
Mike
April 23, 2016 @ 11:40 am
No…you’re wrong. Appetite for Destruction was the same hair pop-metal that had been coming out since the early eighties.
Mike
April 23, 2016 @ 11:47 am
No, you’re not really correct about Cobain. I don’t think he was worried about “street cred” so much as just that he felt like an outsider growing up and while creating Nirvana, but it definitely wasn’t “outsiders” that were buying his music. I think his greatest fear was that the raw energy of Nirvana’s music was being used as a soundtrack by a lot of “bro”-types”for their nefarious, narrow-minded purposes.
Stringbuzz
March 24, 2016 @ 1:09 pm
I really really like this cover by Sturgill.
This is really making me look forward to the rest..
I liked, but wasn’t blown away by Sugar Daddy or Brace for Impact (I still blare them on the jukebox at the bar though. LOL)
This was more in line with what my expectations were for the new music.,
Stephanie
March 24, 2016 @ 2:54 pm
See, I was looking forward to the album after Brace for Impact, whereas I don’t like this at ALL. And I HATE this video (not that that really matters to me one way or the other.) Granted, I dislike the Nirvana song to begin with. Though, I do appreciate the choice of this song, lyrics wise. But oh man, I gave it an honest shot, but have no desire to see if it improves with repeated listening. I couldn’t stop recoiling from the Nirvana-ness of it all. I don’t hate Nirvana (don’t care for them much either,) but I don’t want Nirvana in my Sturgill! That’s just me personally though, as clearly many preferred it to his last couple (which I preferred over this.)
I don’t mind the horns though. Kinda cool.
gtrman86
March 24, 2016 @ 1:09 pm
Man that is pretty damn awesome! I was really dreading hearing it fearing the worst but he definitely put his own spin on it, full of heart and soul.
Fuzzy TwoShirts
March 24, 2016 @ 1:12 pm
I prefer to think of Sturgill as the “Country Music John the Baptist” who preceded Chris Stapleton, the “Country Music Jesus.”
He’s really out there flexing himself creatively at this point, and who knows where or how he’ll peak or burn out.
Acca Dacca
March 24, 2016 @ 1:14 pm
I don’t know. John the Baptist preached the same message as Jesus; I don’t really think Sturgill and Chris are on the same page as far as that goes. Besides, I thought Eric Church was the “Country Music Jesus”?
Fuzzy TwoShirts
March 24, 2016 @ 5:01 pm
Eric Church is Country Music’s Prodigal Son, he may wander, but he’ll always come home, and he’s pretty consistently put out good music.
“Sinners Like Me” is an album I’d count among the greatest Country Music albums of the decade, maybe even in all the genre’s history (if I were to do a top twenty five or thirty, it would be a stretch to count it in the top ten (of course I also think the top five would be “My Love Affair with Trains,” “Choices,” “The Pilgrim,” “Magnificent Music Machine,” and “If I Can Find a Clean Shirt.” So my top picks are a little unusual.))
Andrew
March 24, 2016 @ 1:30 pm
Great review Trigger, some good stuff to think about here. I liked the song, it had a cool feel to it. I’m not sure what the hell the video was trying to say though.
Trigger
March 24, 2016 @ 1:58 pm
The video lost me as well. Either it’s too much symbolism or it is supposed to be abstract.
Andrew
March 24, 2016 @ 2:15 pm
Well, we know Sturgill has a thing for psychedelic music, but yeah, it’s a weird video. Now, Sturgill may have a story that he’s trying to convey, but I believe that just because something seems deep, it may not be. Basically, I believe that if a piece of art(or a song or video) is too complex to understand, it isn’t good art. I’m not dissing the song, I understood the music and lyrics. I am questioning the video.
But maybe i’m just missing the point.
Jeff
March 24, 2016 @ 5:56 pm
The last two videos kinda remind me of a TOOL music video. Does anyone really know what the hell is going on in a TOOL video? Who knows. Are they visually striking, weird, abstract, and cool? Yes. Sturgill even said he is a TOOL fan somewhere on the internet.
Big Cat
March 25, 2016 @ 2:56 am
I think I get the video. I believe Sturgill is singing this to son (as he has said) and saying you can be loving and compassionate in this world; you don’t have to be cold and dark. So here is this boy being attacked by this dark mangy monster yet the boy finds a head on himself (the cannon) strong enough to fight it away back to sea.
Weird video for sure but hey it’s Sturgill. Makes sense to me though so guess I’m weird too!
Keith
March 25, 2016 @ 5:02 pm
Feed the monster that dwells below with love or it will consume you.
Scott S.
March 24, 2016 @ 1:32 pm
This song doesn’t do anything for me. The steel guitar at the begging was cool, but the repetitive drum beat and background synth sounds ruined it. Worst of the three singles so far in my opinion.
Dragin
March 24, 2016 @ 2:08 pm
I happen to agree Scott. While Brace for Impact has grown on me…. this song just does not do it for me. This is not what I like to hear when I want to listen to Sturgill Simpson. I do not like the horns at all. I know sometimes it takes a lot of listening to determine how much you really like a particular song but I can say for certain that this one will not be included in my Sturgill Simpson playlist.
Dane
March 24, 2016 @ 1:34 pm
Trigger- do you know if he used his road band for this, and the album?
Trigger
March 24, 2016 @ 1:59 pm
I don’t know the personnel on the album at the moment.
Nolyn
March 24, 2016 @ 2:30 pm
The Dap Kings provide the horns on this track I believe.
Jeff
March 24, 2016 @ 5:16 pm
“Recorded primarily at Nashville”™s The Butcher Shoppe, Simpson was joined in the studio by Grammy Award-winning engineerDavid Ferguson (Johnny Cash, John Prine, “Cowboy” Jack Clement) and assistant engineer Sean Sullivan. Along with members of his touring band, the album features Dave Roe on bass, Dan Dugmore on steel guitar, Dougie Wilkinson on bagpipes, Garo Yellin and Arthur Cook on cello, Jonathan Dinklage and Whitney LaGrange on violin and special guests The Dap-Kings.”
PriceOnTheRidge
March 24, 2016 @ 1:56 pm
For whatever reason, every Sturgill song I hear takes multiple listens to really love it. And I’m as much of a fan as Trigger probably is. I’ve always felt like most of his music is not meant to hook you after the initial first listening. Does anyone else feel this way? And with any other artists?
Big Cat
March 24, 2016 @ 4:29 pm
Yes. You could argue that meta modern is still at its peak popularity too. It was different and it took people a while to understand it. Now it’s getting “hip”. People don’t like change. But I’m convinced Sturgill wants to constantly change to stay in front of people’s expectations. To me that’s cool. I don’t want the same thing over and over.
The song is completely badass IMO
Rob
March 24, 2016 @ 2:08 pm
After one listen, I like the sound of the song, but this is kinda like “The Promise,” I can’t barely understand him sometimes lol
Gena R.
March 24, 2016 @ 3:14 pm
I thought the same thing! 🙂 The instrumentation and vocal dynamics are nice, but the lyrics do tend to get lost, especially during the verses…
TheRealBobCephus
March 24, 2016 @ 2:57 pm
I don’t know that this is actually directed at his fans. This album is for his son right? What if its directed at his son, who is too young to understand love and Sturgill’s music and what it all means right now? That would make that little tag at the end of the chorus fit a little better. I don’t know if that makes any sense at all with the context the video provides (or convolutes?), but that was one of my initial reactions. Also the cello solo was sublime.
Andrew
March 24, 2016 @ 3:21 pm
That’s actually a really good theory. I wouldn’t be surprised if you are right.
Trigger
March 24, 2016 @ 5:07 pm
The album is for his son, but that doesn’t necessarily mean every song is, or that the songs are about his son, or directed to his son necessarily. That doesn’t mean it isn’t either. But I think the message of “In Bloom” is well-recognized, and even if Sturgill shakes up the lyrics a little bit, the underlying message remains, at least to some extent.
Kross
March 25, 2016 @ 5:20 am
If this album is for his son, is it safe to assume that Keep it Between the Lines, is his version of the old Ricky Van Shelton song?
Wicket
March 25, 2016 @ 9:47 am
Kurt Cobain made a joke of masculinity with this song. Sturgill says he doesn’t want his son to feel like he has to be tough or cold to be a man. It’s only an indictment to his fans if they are hard-ons or assholes. I don’t know who you see at his shows, but the fans there seem pretty cool to me, except for the occasional drunk dickbag. Finding an underlying message seems pretty silly when he flat out explains why he chose the song.
Trigger
March 25, 2016 @ 11:13 am
A few things:
First off, I’m not passing judgement on Sturgill Simpson’s fans. So I think you’re assigning something to me that I’m not asserting. If anything, I questioned passing judgement on Sturgill Simpson’s fans.
Second, I wrote this review before Sturgill Simpson decided to pass some notes to various media sources about the changing of the lyrics, or who he wrote the song for, etc. etc. So to take things he says 24 hours after I posted my review and say, “Well, you are wrong because he said this” is presumptuous and unfair. I stand 100% behind my take on this song, and nothing Sturgill has said really changes any of my feelings on it. It helps fill in some holes, but nothing Sturgill can say will ever change what “In Bloom” was originally about when Nirvana cut it 25 years ago.
I knew Sturgill was going to release this song as a single. I said in a March 21st article, “And all this might be even more difficult to navigate soon since it looks like Sturgill”™s cover of Nirvana”™s “In Bloom” could be the next single from the record.”
https://savingcountrymusic.com/sturgill-simpson-im-never-going-to-make-anything-other-than-a-country-record/
So before Sturgill released this song, I had already spent a lot of time researching the original version, what it meant, how it was received, the entire premise of the “Nevermind” album. In fact I kind of spent hours falling down a rabbit hole researching it. That’s how I was able to write a 16-paragraph review for the song some 2 hours after it was posted. Not to give myself more credit than is due, but I feel like I’m passing back volley’s with Sturgill in the press or something. Twice in as many weeks I’ve written a story about him, and then shortly thereafter a story comes out addressing something I said or asserted in Rolling Stone Country.
I’m not saying Sturgill Simpson is lying, being dishonest, or anything like that. But he does have a tendency to say things that don’t always line up. Earlier this week, there were two separate articles, one from Garden and Gun, and one from Rolling Stone Country, that both came out at the same time. In one Sturgill said he no longer thinks of himself as a country artist, and the second one he said he will always make country records. Which one is true? They probably both are. It’s a complicated situation, Sturgill’s career. I’m not saying one is a lie, and one is the truth, but I don’t know that you can take stock in either quotes as hard facts. This is also one of the reasons Sturgill is so tough on the press. I know how it is myself. I’ve written over 3,300 articles here, and people will go back and find some garbage I wrote in 2008 and shove it in my face and call me a hypocrite or a liar or whatever. That’s why I tell folks not to buy too hard into Sturgill’s quotes about only making five records. At one point Sturgill was quoted as saying he was going to quit music. I kind of find it hard to believe that he thought “to love someone” was part of the lyrics to “In Bloom.” I’m not complaining, I like the change. I think it completes the song. But everyone’s take on songs is different. So I don’t care what Sturgill Simpson has to say about it. A song should speak for itself, and you can’t assume every listener will read some article where he explains what he wants people to take away from it. In fact, you can assume most listener’s won’t.
Will James
March 24, 2016 @ 3:05 pm
I’ve always thought Sturgill to be a rather orn’ry cuss, ever since I timidly asked him six years ago if he could play a bit longer set as we were running early for once. The look he gave me. And then he waits til he gets on stage and demands a shot of Jack Daniels before he would start, me trying to get back to the small bar five deep. I never thought the guy was saving anything, though I still think the performance he gave me that night was worth what I paid him.
marc
March 24, 2016 @ 3:12 pm
I like the song it has a bit of a Van Morrison feel.
Laura
March 24, 2016 @ 3:45 pm
I have no idea what the original sounds like (I was too busy listening to Hag in high school and college), but I really like this. I like that Sturgill is doing what he wants rather than listening to any of us, and I think it works here.
I’ve always thought Sturgill sounds more like Keith Whitley than Waylon, and there are a few lines in this song that are astonishing in their similarities to Keith’s voice and phrasing. I’m looking forward to hearing the entire album – I suspect it won’t get nearly as much constant play as Metamodern got in my car, but I’m looking forward to it nonetheless.
Big Cat
March 24, 2016 @ 4:35 pm
I think it is badass personally. People hate change, Sturgill loves it.
Warthog
March 24, 2016 @ 4:50 pm
While on the subject of Sturgill, does anyone know where I can get (or hell, just listen to) his ‘Bastard Children’ songs “Hey Now” and “Four Flame Candle”? I can’t find them on YouTube or anywhere.
Jim Bob
March 25, 2016 @ 5:14 am
Try searching for them on SCM. I swear Trigger posted them. But it’s been a bit, I could be wrong.
Warthog
March 26, 2016 @ 5:29 pm
The links are gone.
I managed to find “Four Flame Candle” (I love it, by the way), but I still can’t find “Hey Now”.
Jake W
March 24, 2016 @ 4:51 pm
Well…..
That was interesting, now I love nirvana and believe Kurt Cobain was a genius, so anything that borrows from them I am going to be hypercritical of. It is a good cover, definitely injects Sturgill’s personality and a country flavor into it. Do I think he did the justice that I believe he could have to it? No. I am starting to see, and this is only judging by what ive heard so far, these are songs that are a personal take on the music that influencef sturgill. I dont think that is a bad thing, i cant wait to see him perform this live next month.
Also, I read some pretty interesting opinions in the comments above, bashing and labeling KC or SS was not one of them.
Who produced this album, i put through my amp and the quality was not that good. That looked like an official video, but the vocals were very too far below the music. Hopefully, the album and a good pair of headphones will prove different. Anyway, still a really good and unique cover just could see it being a little more developed.
Trigger
March 24, 2016 @ 5:04 pm
Sturgill produced the album himself. That doesn’t mean he mixed and mastered it himself, but as producer he would have the final say so on these things.
Erik North
March 24, 2016 @ 4:55 pm
With respect to what Trigger bought up of Sturgill being conceived of as this time and place’s Country Music Savior–well, putting any one person upon that pedestal is, to me anyway, a dangerous thing because it is such a burdensome and onerous “task”. This could be why Chris Stapleton doesn’t want that label either.
It seems to me that country music did have a savior in the 1990s, in the personage of Garth Brooks. His emergence and dominance in that decade is, in my opinion, an example of how looking for and finding a single “savior” in any genre can be a mixed blessing. Yes, his jaw-dropping popularity, which was rivaled overall only by Elvis and the Beatles, did a lot to bring respectability to the country music world in that decade. But at the same time, his stage shows, with his high-flying acrobatics and spectacles more suited for corporate 1980s arena rock, not only obscured a lot of the really good neo-traditional elements of his own music, but it also set the stage for practically everything that has been done in mainstream country from that point to virtually this very second. In short, Garth Brooks made the genre BIGGER to be sure, but that doesn’t necessarily mean he made it BETTER, at least not in all facets.
And besides, changes in any genre, including country, are usually instigated not by just one single artist or band, but by a collection of them at the right place and the right time (although Bro Country is the most graphic and toxic exception). It can’t be just one Messiah doing the heavy lifting. In a real sense, what Sturgill Simpson and Chris Stapleton seem to be saying is what Bob Dylan warned us with respect to idolizing him and others in his 1965 hit “Subterranean Homesick Blues: “Don’t follow leaders, watch the parking meters.”
I miss Steve Gaines
March 24, 2016 @ 5:02 pm
I hear pedal, I hear lap steel (?) Good song!
Wally
March 24, 2016 @ 5:06 pm
As someone who was totally blown away by Brace for Impact, this completely underwhelmed me.
I thought you did a great review Trig but for me, there’s so many OTHER Nirvana songs I could of heard him do besides this one. I truly hope that ANY correlation to Kurt Cobain stops at the speculation in this article.
Sturgill Simpson has already done in 2 albums, for me, musically, a hundred fold the amount of influence than Nirvana did. Nirvana wouldn’t have done squat if it wasn’t for MTV. A lot of people forget that.
From what I’ve seen and experienced Sturgill crosses a lot of ground culturally and generationally. Nirvana didn’t do that. Sturgil’s music actually appeals to a hell of a lot more people too. Old, young, country die hards to I’d never listen to a country record but I’ll listen to that. Sturgil’s music is real music from a real person.
Justin
March 24, 2016 @ 5:20 pm
Well not to piss off trigger or the commenters cause I love this site, but this cover is absolutely terrible. As for the article itself, I get some of the comparisons of Sturgill/Kurt but to think he’s in Kurt Cobains ballpark right now.is absurd. I’m from Appalachia so I naturally root for those artist like Sturgill, SundAy best, tyler Childers, chris stapleton who just donated 50 grand to his high school for the band BTW. But Sturgill isn’t the guy to turn country back around.he is almost a country music pink Floyd with all his weirdness. If country artist do pop covers or pop and.or 80s rock covers country it gets negative reviews most of the time, but Sturgill does a nirvana cover and it gets two guns up like he is being some expressive genius is crazy.
Trigger
March 24, 2016 @ 8:15 pm
Just for the record, I am not comparing Kurt Cobain and Sturgill Simpson as far as their artistry or impact on culture. Obviously, Kurt is a household name, and at the moment Sturgill isn’t. I mentioned the two together because so many others have, and I was trying to expound on how that’s probably unfair to both.
ManBearPig
March 24, 2016 @ 5:30 pm
Loving this cover. Was happy to hear that he made this his own and didn’t try to incorporate the signature guitar riff from the Nirvana version.
I may be the only one, but I get a Keith Whitley vibe from Sturgill’s vocal on this one.
JohnWayneTwitty
March 24, 2016 @ 5:50 pm
Holy mother of fuck. This is cool.
He picked the perfect song that could be Strugill’d
ShadeGrown
March 24, 2016 @ 5:54 pm
It’s ok. I like Brace For Impact better. One of my dislikes is when I feel country singers “over singing” parts… That’s why, though I have AND listen to Sturgill’s solo albums, I don’t dig him as much as some. For anyone who cares, Witchcraft covered “Even In His Youth” recently and it’s really cool, though not taking a different path with it like Simpson does here.
one_time
March 24, 2016 @ 6:01 pm
This is the best song review that I’ve read on SCM. You really dug deep. Great cover. The horns sounded amazing.
I don’t care what genre this song (or album) fits. It’s not the same as his last record…so what? Sturgill’s music is transcendent and doesn’t need to fit in a specific mold. I can’t wait for the entire album to drop!
TheOutlawJoseyWales
March 24, 2016 @ 6:09 pm
everything I’ve heard so far has blown me away, I get that this album will be polarizing for a lot of folks but I’m willing to bet this’ll get played just as much if not more than Metamodern.
RG
March 24, 2016 @ 6:11 pm
I like this version of In Bloom. I thought Sturgill might roar at us with his range and go more rock infused. But I like the toned down simpleness of how he covers it.
I approve. Get it Sturgill!!
Boss
March 24, 2016 @ 6:15 pm
I think we’ve lost our boy. The magic seems gone. This sounds like a bad Keith Whitley cover song.
Big Cat
March 24, 2016 @ 6:24 pm
Lol. “Our boy”… Who’s boy? Your boy?
But I think you sum up Sturgill’s entire motivation and ironically what this song is all about.
He doesn’t want to be country music’s ‘boy’. He’s in it for different reasons. I applaud him for being different.
Patrick C
March 24, 2016 @ 6:43 pm
Big Cat I do believe you are looking at things with a good eye.
Patrick C
March 24, 2016 @ 6:37 pm
what a time for this to happen. what only a few of you perhaps realize is what this guy is shaping in to. he has the makings to be like the Bowie of country in the fact that his vision of what he wants to do is not what people expect, or be able/willing to comprehend. He becoming a true artist, and you can know this because he has vision. if you have really been following his career as i have, you can hear it in his quotes and see it in his work. At this time of the country genre itself being diluted in the hip-pop blender its easy for people to say this and that and have all sort of valid points, but when years have past we may very well look back like we have with Bowie and take it all in and realize he had a vision that no one could imagine. it deviates from what we might expect from a country artist largely because what we have come expect from the very term “country artist” is a bunch corporate shills pedaling vapid pop music wearing a country costume. Like Leroy Virgil and J.B. Beverly, Sturgill is one of the current artists i follow because of their talent, vision and character.
Kross
March 24, 2016 @ 6:42 pm
Here’s the thing…this is a cool version of a song that most gen x-ers have heard s thousand times. I also appreciate what Nirvana did for rock-n-roll in the early 90’s. You could almost make an argument that Cobain single handily killed hair metal. But for me, this song means very little. Almost a year to the day after Nevermind was released a little album called Hollywood Townhall by the Jayhawks came into existence and made the biggest impression on a young man in his early 20’s and set me on a musical path that I have rarely deviated too far from in the last 20 years. I would have been more impressed if Sturgill did a cover of a Son Volt or Jayhawks song. Those were the bands that defined the early 90’s for me. 1 1/4 guns up for me.
Mike
March 24, 2016 @ 6:47 pm
Trigger – Just a comment and possible clarification. Nevermind’s breakthrough is consider the catalyst for Ten’s sales and Nevermind has significantly passed Ten in total sales since then. Of course, some of this was due to his death but also do to the larger impact and popularity of Nirvana. Also, Nirvana always remained the go to headliner act during this era. They were even offered the Lallapalooza in 1994 after VS by Pearl Jam had already been released and outsold In Utero (partly due to Nirvana purposely not promoting In Utero). So not saying Kurt Cobain was a one man show but I just felt like his impact was more significant than you seemed to imply and not all of “the Nirvana moment” has been revisionist history. Overall great article.
ShadeGrown
March 24, 2016 @ 7:36 pm
Record sales, schmecord sales. “Ten” is better than “Nevermind”. Cobain used his laid back heroin fueled attitude to make junior high schoolers think he was cool and that drove his legend. He didn’t have near the talent of Staley, Cantrell, Cornell, or Veddar.
Mike
March 24, 2016 @ 8:10 pm
Wasn’t going to respond but I then I saw you decided to insult Cobain for heroin lyrics and then praise Layne Staley? Tell me this is satire? Please?
ShadeGrown
March 24, 2016 @ 8:23 pm
So?
ShadeGrown
March 24, 2016 @ 8:27 pm
It wasn’t his lyrics it was his ATTITUDE! He was SO cool cause he didn’t want to be a star. But forget all that, he didn’t write as good of songs as the other frontmen of his time. And it isn’t even one bit fucking close. But, I do like him and his band.
Trigger
March 24, 2016 @ 8:30 pm
Obviously I don’t profess to be a master historian of grunge, but “Ten” was released in August of 1991, and “Nevermind” a month later. Also in Billboard’s decade end charts for the 90’s, “Ten” was #14, and “Nevermind” was #32. I won’t argue that “Nevermind” helped bolster “Ten” because my guess is that it did, just like “Ten” probably helped bolster “Nevermind.” But clearly “Nevermind” has enjoyed legendary status since the era. The 25th Anniversary for “Nevermind” was massive. The 25th Anniversary for “Ten” was sort of something a few people tweeted out about and folks were like, “Oh, that’s nice.” And I think a lot of Kurt’s mythos has been built up by the obsession over him by Rolling Stone.
I actually wanted to go further with that train of thought and talk about Lalapalooza, 1994, the rise of Industrial with NIN’s “Downward Spiral” and the emergence of Marilyn Manson, 3rd generation punk with Green Day, but then I decided that was too much of a tangent. It really is an interesting music study though. That was a very dynamic time in Americana popular music. Much more interesting than today.
Scotty J
March 24, 2016 @ 8:38 pm
One side effect for an artist to cover a well known song from a very well known act in another genre is you are going to invariably have the discussion veer off into that other very well known act.
Actually I’m not sure if covering a song like this is such a great idea regardless of the artist doing the covering. May be best to just leave well enough alone.
Henning Furbach
March 25, 2016 @ 1:23 am
“The Nirvana moment” refers to the moment when a scene that has been building up reaches the tipping point, right? At the time, underground bands in the Seattle scene, but as importantly bands like the Pixies, Dinosaur Jr or the Throwing Muses had been boiling up. When Nirvana took it up that crucial notch with the accessibility of “Smells Like Teen Spirit” that was like the first gush that spilt over and broke the dam.
I think that moment in traditional/Roots/alternative/whateveryoumaycallit Country has happened with the mega success of Chris Stapleton. Sturgill Simpson would take the place of the Pixies in that scenario.
Trigger
March 25, 2016 @ 10:31 am
Good observation.
Toby in AK
March 24, 2016 @ 6:54 pm
I really want to like this song. I can’t though, something is off with the volume levels. I actually turned it down because it was hurting my ears, then I couldn’t hear the lyrics. I saw one other commentator mention this. I listened on headphones and thought maybe it just wasn’t a good headphone song, I don’t know. It’s too bad, because I like the arrangement and vocals.
hoptowntiger94
March 24, 2016 @ 6:59 pm
Kurt Cobain was probably 23 years old when he wrote this song; the angst, misunderstood artist play doesn’t look good on a 37 year old man. Do you think Willie Nelson said “my next album is probably going to piss off a lot of people” before he realeased Stardust? Or ever bitched about the fans his music attracted?
Trigger
March 24, 2016 @ 8:31 pm
Not to argue against your point, but I do think it’s worth pointing out that Willie’s solo career really didn’t start until he was nearly 40.
Lunchbox
March 24, 2016 @ 7:37 pm
listened to this sober the first time and thought it was okay. took a couple hits off the hash rig and it didn’t really help. it’s not Sturgill’s fault..i just really don’t like Niravana’s music.
KSU
March 24, 2016 @ 7:42 pm
Hi Trigger
It’s rare that I post anything in the comment section, but I’ve been a long time reader of SCM. Your writing in the past few weeks has been some of your best ever (in my opinion). Thank you so much for providing us something free that has such great insight on the music we love. It must be hard work, and you’re obviously very passionate about it. I’ll read until I die. Many thanks.
Trigger
March 24, 2016 @ 7:47 pm
Thanks KSU. I appreciate the words. Thanks for reading.
Studley Dudley
March 24, 2016 @ 8:30 pm
Sturgill, smurgill. I’m waiting for the next FGL record.
Mean Willie Green
March 24, 2016 @ 10:43 pm
excellent – Sturgill Simpson is coloring outside the lines again with another genre-bending cover
Scott S.
March 24, 2016 @ 11:46 pm
Gave this another listen with headphones after work. Didn’t help. The song seems overly produced. Sounds on top of sounds, and the drums are drowned out until the end, sounding like a metronome. I did notice one thing though. What I mistook for synths on my computer speakers appear to be a string section, or a computer generated string section. Either way it’s all too much with the horns, strings, and other instruments piled on top of each other.
Grady Shades
March 25, 2016 @ 1:00 am
I liked the horns, I liked the strings, I liked the steel. What I think would have elevated this, more cowbell. Sturgill decided less cowbell and the result is less cowbell and not more.
Big Cat
March 25, 2016 @ 3:55 am
Trigger have You read Sturgill had to write the Cobain estate to get permission to release the song after he cut it and sent it to Atlantic they realized he got the lyrics wrong with “don’t know what it means to love someone” in the corus.
Seems like an ironic miscue considering how much of this theme is in his music.
Anyway apparently the note was pretty cool and they approved. Found that interesting.
Trigger
March 25, 2016 @ 10:30 am
I’ve read all of the stuff Sturgill has said about the song post it’s release. I’m not calling Sturgill a liar by any means, but I find it a little hard to believe that he though “to love someone” was part of this song. I completely believe the story about the note, but if you’re going to cover a song like that, you’re going to pull up the lyrics, you’re going to make sure you have them right, etc. etc. I don’t have a problem with Sturgill changing the lyrics, and I can’t see why anyone would. I like the change. I kind of see it like when Waylon covered Neil Young’s “Are You Ready For The Country.” But if you’re going to cover a song, you probably going to know the original lyrics, and what the song was originally about. Or at least you should.
Again, I’m not saying Sturgill’s lying to us or anything like that. But nothing he’s said so far post the release of this song has changed my opinions on it.
Big Cat
March 26, 2016 @ 1:29 pm
I wouldn’t expect you to change your opinion. Think you responded to these post before you read/heard the comments. Sturgill threw the letter writing bit out on Zane’s radio show. So I believe that part but I also agree there is no way he didn’t know the lyrics.
I think it is just kick ass arrangement and mixed beautifully.
RD
March 25, 2016 @ 4:45 am
Its hard to take a crappy, meaningless, nonsensical song, like anything from Nirvana, and turn it into something decent. This sounds like something that the fat Elvis would have cut in late ’76.
Bigfoot is Real (lonesome, on'ry, and mean)
March 25, 2016 @ 8:00 am
I see this as a logical extension of where Sturgill Simpson is and where he is headed. I’m along for the ride. Love it.
richk
March 25, 2016 @ 8:21 am
I didn’t like it on first listen because I was looking for a “cover” … it was just *so* different and his voice seemed out of place. On second listen I realized this isn’t so much a cover song, it seems, as Sturgill inhabiting a song and making it entirely his own. It’s an interesting question, then, as to *why* he would do that….I think Trigger’s review addresses that question astoundingly well. Kudos.
Frank the Tank
March 25, 2016 @ 8:58 am
I was a Nirvana fan back in my teenage years (and I still enjoy listening to them from time to time) and I like the original, but I also really like this version. I prefer this to “Brace for Impact,” but I’m looking forward to hearing the album as a whole.
Derek Sullivan
March 25, 2016 @ 10:03 am
I also love the horns. To be honest, and I’m not the biggest Sturgill fan, I was getting a little bored with the song in the middle. The horns give the song a second wind and it ends strong.
ManBearPig
March 25, 2016 @ 11:06 am
I appreciate your take on the song Trigger, and completely understand how you’d reach the conclusions that you did about Sturgill’s reasoning for covering it. But if Sturgill is to be believed, it appears his reasons for recording the song and what he wants it to represent have much more to do with youth & his son than with an indictment of fans who misunderstand him.
You’ve most likely seen this quote from Rolling Stone Country by now.
“I wanted a song on the album to capture that awkward stage in every young boy’s life where they are searching for their place in the world,” Simpson tells Rolling Stone Country. “One night while discussing the album with my wife, she asked, ‘Well, what were you listening to when you were 13?’ I remember in seventh or eighth grade, when [Nevermind] dropped, it was like a bomb went off in my bedroom. For me, that song has always summed up what it means to be a teenager, and I think it tells a young boy that he can be sensitive and compassionate ”” he doesn’t have to be tough or cold to be a man.”
Trigger
March 25, 2016 @ 11:47 am
Alright, well I just spent 30 minutes responding to two other comments on this issue, and another comment longer than your just came in from “Jimmy” with the same concern. And now a sinking suspicion I had is being validated.
Nirvana wrote “In Bloom” as an indictment of their own fans and the prevailing misconceptions about their music. If Sturgill wants to have his version mean something else, especially since he changed the lyrics a little bit, excellent. He has every right to do that. But as I explained above, Sturgill has actively spoken about and addressed the misconception with his music many times, and it clearly is something that bothers him, if not angers him. I’m not saying that Sturgill’s version of “In Bloom” doesn’t have anything to do with a lesson that Sturgill wants to impart to his son. What I’m saying is that inherently, this song also has to do with the disillusion with one’s own fans because of the incorrect conclusions they draw from their music.
And furthermore, every song means something different to every listener. I didn’t have the benefit of this Sturgill Simpson quote when I wrote this review, and neither will 95% of the people when they listen to it. “In Bloom” is about what it’s about. And if Sturgill didn’t want people drawing wrongful conclusions about what it’s about (and I would still asset my conclusion is not wrong), then perhaps he should have chosen a different song to cover.
ManBearPig
March 25, 2016 @ 9:47 pm
Can I just say how great it is that we are debating the intentions Sturgill had when he chose to cover a Nirvana song, as opposed to trying to understand why he signed with a major and released an albums worth of Dallas Davidson co-writes.
This is a good problem to have.
Most importantly Trigger, I appreciate your opinions and your work to save country music. Thanks.
Jimmy
March 25, 2016 @ 11:13 am
Trigger- Brilliant song review. But I just read something that makes me think Sturgill had a completely different interpretation of the song than what you suggest. Check out Sturgill’s recent quote from Rolling Stone, about his “In Bloom” cover:
“I remember in seventh or eighth grade, when that album dropped, it was like a bomb went off in my bedroom,” Simpson says of Nirvana’s Nevermind. “For me, that song has always summed up what it means to be a teenager, and I think it tells a young boy that he can be sensitive and compassionate ”” he doesn”™t have to be tough or cold to be a man. So I wanted to make a very beautiful and pure homage to Kurt.”
This meaning is not only far simpler, but quite different than the one you postulate:
“The premise of “In Bloom” is quietly brilliant, and the more the song and Nirvana became misunderstood (including how society assigned hero status to Cobain), the more brilliant it became. But whether it is Nirvana”™s version, or Sturgill Simpson”™s version, “In Bloom” is an indictment of ones own fans, and is based in part on judgement and assumption. Sturgill gives the song a slight twist by adding the addendum, “But he don”™t know what it means, knows not what it means”¦to love someone,” but despite the more bright feel of the music of Sturgill”™s version, the message remains the same.
Just like Kurt Cobain, Sturgill Simpson has been hounded by the prevalence of misunderstanding. In the press, in the population of his fans, there are thousands that have shown up just to be a part of the scene, while the message, and even the style of Sturgill”™s music passes well above their heads. There”™s the Waylon Jennings comparisons, there”™s references to his songs as “drug music,” even though this applies to one, maybe two songs, and even these are just passing references, and not the condoning of anything. But more importantly, there”™s the lumping of responsibility on Sturgill to be a country music savior, to save popular music just like Kurt did, and the expectation to criticize other current country artists. Perhaps all of this has become buried in Sturgill”™s psyche, and is now being expressed through his music.”
The meaning of the song being that a young boy can be sensitive and compassionate, as Sturgill says in his quote, is a far cry from this cover choice being a reaction to the pressures of success and labeling as country music savior/ ignorant fans not understanding his music, etc. Unless I am missing something, or if Sturgill is trying to deceive us (which falls into “reading too much into Sturgill and his music choices” realm) it appears that maybe way too much was read into this choice as a cover.
So this also begs the question: Was Sturgill’s interpretation of the meaning of Nirvana’s “In Bloom” completely off? Telling little boys they can be compassionate is way different than an indictment of someone’s fans. It seems the two meanings are mutually exclusive of one another.
Trigger
March 25, 2016 @ 11:57 am
I just spent the last hour responding to similar comments, and it’s lunchtime so I’m just going to link to them here and you can read further. If Sturgill says the song is a lesson to his son, I will take him at his word. He can try to change the song’s meaning if he wants, but then he can’t be surprised if listeners draw different conclusions. “In Bloom” is about what it’s about, and Sturgill can’t change that even if he wants to. That said, I think it can mean two different things, and both at the same time. The best songs most all mean different things to different people, shaping themselves to the listener’s own experiences.
https://savingcountrymusic.com/song-review-sturgill-simpsons-in-bloom-nirvana-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-726726
https://savingcountrymusic.com/song-review-sturgill-simpsons-in-bloom-nirvana-cover/comment-page-1/#comment-726736
Jimmy
March 25, 2016 @ 12:29 pm
Trigger- Very good points. Interesting to think that his latest quote might possibly be a reaction to what you wrote. I am not ruling that out in the least. You seem to make a lot more sense than Sturgill these days. I don’t understand all the mixed messages coming from him. And I don’t understand this quote as well:
Simpson tells Rolling Stone. “I thought it was hilarious when ‘Brace for Impact’ was released and people said I had abandoned country even though the song is dripping with pedal steel. If anything, that tells me I’m making progress.”
Does Sturgill really think that instrumentation alone will make for a country song? Listen to a lot of the pop country on the radio today and it has a fiddle or banjo on it, but its hardly true country music. Sometimes I get the feeling that not even Sturgill is sure of what he wants or what he is trying to portray.
Trigger
March 25, 2016 @ 1:32 pm
I don’t want to come across like a douchebag that thinks a press story is about them. That might have been an overreaction. But the timing and how that all happened was quite curious.
Sturgill Simpson appears to want it both ways right now. He doesn’t want to be burdened by the “restrictions” of being a country artist, either creatively or logistically, but he’s also not ready to give up all the press attention he gets from country, or all the street cred he’s built up in the genre.
The same things goes for “In Bloom.” Sturgill covering a Nirvana song is something that you know is going to bring him incredible attention from listeners and the media, but he doesn’t want to be saddled by any perceived negative connotations the song might have, or the meaning from its original writers. I’ve got no problems with Sturgill covering the song. I think he did a great job, and I gave him a full positive grade. But since the song is about listeners drawing misconceptions about your music, I felt it was important for someone to really delve into what “In Bloom” was about.
“Brace For Impact,” is a similar example. I listen to country music all day. I know what certain instruments sound like what. I had no idea that was a steel guitar in “Brace For Impact.” I thought it was slide guitar. I think it is a stretch to call it a country song personally, but I guess that’s a matter of opinion. Sturgill himself has said he no longer thinks of himself as a country singer, and that his new album might piss some people off. And here it is, and here we are, and as he said himself, some feathers are getting ruffled. I still think we should all wait to hear the full album before coming to any hard and fast conclusions. But he can’t complain if some people think his new songs aren’t country, when that’s exactly what he’s been warning listeners about for months.
There’s a lot of unnecessary conflict and misunderstanding swirling around Sturgill Simpson right now. And it’s not coming from me.
Sturgill Jennings
June 25, 2018 @ 1:58 am
In bloom doesn’t mean what you think it does. Kurt wrote the lyrics “He’s the one Who like all our pretty songs and he likes to sing along and he likes to shoot his gun but he don’t know what it means” about his friend Dylan Carlson.
LocoMojo
March 25, 2016 @ 1:02 pm
I was a big Nirvana fan. Kurt was a complex artist. In Bloom was written about an audience he really didn’t have at that point.
Sometimes i’m not sure if the lyrics of his songs are genius or an inside joke. Probably a lot of both. More than the music and lyrics, It was his personality and attitude that caught the masses attention. There popularity, compared to Pearl Jam, is because he passed away. Pearl Jam has been selling out arenas for over 20 years, while Nirvana only had a handful of arena shows.
Pearl Jam’s music was much more accessible, to a larger demographic, because they reminded older music fans of the arena rock scene like a Led Zep, 20 years prior.
Its too bad Kurt didn’t live on, cause i could have seen him become a singular folk artist. See him at a smaller club with just him and his guitar.
Mike Rutherford
March 27, 2016 @ 8:56 am
Your first three sentences are EXACTLY correct. Nirvana were not a well-known band whatsoever when “Nevermind” dropped. Our local record shop had exactly 2 copies (one cassette/one CD – they did not ever carry “Bleach” until “Nevermind” blew up). So to say that Kurt wrote “In Bloom” regarding his own fans just doesn’t add up to me because he did not have that many fans and was just a small fry, club artist at that point touring in a dingy van. He might have written the lyrics in regards to how he viewed certain fans of (whatever) style(s) of music, but I do not think he wrote w/any intention toward his own fans. It is easy to view it that way with revision because as always, hindsight is 20/20 and we now know how huge they became. But while writing the album’s material, including “In Bloom”? Nirvana were just a TINY little band. I KNOW – I saw them open for Tad on the “Bleach” tour. Might have been 40 people there if I’m being very generous.
Trigger
March 27, 2016 @ 10:05 am
I disagree. If you go back and you read the history of Nirvana, they had incredible momentum, and a ton of underground support before “Nevermind,” and Cobain was specifically worried about alienating those fans as the band exploded internationally. Was the support even close to what they would eventually get when “Smells Like Teen Spirit” became such a hit? Of course not, but that doesn’t mean the spotlight wasn’t still burning bright on them, and they had enough of a fandom to feel misunderstood for their message.
Think about it like this: We all think of Sturgill Simpson as this country artist who has exploded in popularity recently, is selling out shows left and right, will probably have the #1 album in country when he releases his record, and could turn the entire genre on his head. But the simple fact is 99.5% of Americans still don’t know who the hell he is.
Furthermore, Kurt Cobain, his Nirvana bandmates, and journalists, biographers, etc., have all come to a strong consensus about what “In Bloom” is about. Don;t take my word for it, just go anywhere and read what the song is about. That’s what I did before writing this review. I don’t profess myself to be a Nirvana expert, so I deferred to the opinion of others.
Mike Rutherford
March 27, 2016 @ 1:02 pm
The problem with that is Kurt and only Kurt truly knows what was going through his head at that time (of writing those lyrics) and Kurt was well-known to “screw” with people’s heads after the fact. The truth is? Other than a line here and a line there in most of those songs? A lot of those lyrics were written at the last second, some in the car ride to lay down his vocal tracks.
As far as how “big” they were and how much momentum they had? Well, that was theirs and anyone’s guess. The way I remember it, I would guesstimate today, 25 yrs. on? They were right around where the Pixies were around the “Surfer Rosa” era (an album that was SUPER HARD to find in a lot of places just like “Bleach” itself was).
I remember hearing the album when it first came out. I did NOT hear a “big” hit with “Teen Spirit” and I still to this day have never understood the massive appeal of that song. The first song that I thought was genius was “Lithium”. I loved the album but I absolutely could NOT foresee the mega-success that was to come. It was like GNR’s “Appetite For Destruction” (except “Nevermind” started taking off more quickly – it took AFD a while and I remember being blown away that the rest of the world was finally catching on. Actually I felt that way in both cases). As for how “big” Sturgill is? Well, know who he is and probably have longer than a great number of people as I was born and raised very very close to where he was. I’ve only heard “Metamodern” one time through so, I don’t know if I’m a fan or not. He actually, the way he (some times) says opposing things about one singular matter, reminds me a bit of how Kurt was.
Back to “In Bloom” and it’s “meaning”? I can no longer remember the name, but I can remember clearly, back in the day, Kurt saying that he actually wrote that song to/for his best friend at the time. This was prior to their mega-surge in popularity in an issue of Alt. Press magazine (prior to the release of the album actually). Whatever he/they/anyone might have said post-mega-success? I have to take with a huge grain of salt personally as it kind of makes him look/sound like some sort of a foreshadowing genius. (I just looked it up to make sure I was not crazy: “a thinly disguised portrait of his friend Dylan Carlson”).
Unfortunately, the man is dead and it’s impossible to know 100% for sure (and I don’t doubt that you read exactly what you say you did regarding what it is about). However, it’s odd I remember him specifically mentioning it being about his best friend before the album was even released (even then, in 1991, the song already dated back a bit as I think it was written in late ’89, first recorded in ’90 maybe? It’s been 25 years and some of the precise details might be just slightly off a bit). Not that anyone cares, but I also remember him mentioning that the original version of “Breed” was written about Tad Doyle and his stomach issues (“Immodium” I think was the title). For me? Being such a massive Pixies fan at the time, Nirvana simply represented an updated version of that band. I prefer Frank Black’s solo career (especially those Catholics albums) to the Pixies BY FAR however.
I also agree w/the comment (by LocoMojo) that Kurt maybe would have become a great folk type musician later on. The greatest song he ever recorded just might be the “Unplugged” version of Leadbelly’s “Where Did You Sleep Last Night”. I’ve turned people that claimed to HATE Nirvana into literal fans by simply playing them that song. It’s powerful. In fact, IIRC, he was supposed to record an entire album’s worth of Leadbelly covers right around the time he committed suicide. I never did care how huge they became. I loved them before and I loved them just as much afterwards and I, to this day, feel as though his death was a great loss to music in general (though I doubt many folks here will agree w/me, and that is okay too).
Anyways, I’m going to bow out of this conversation now as it gets too easy to start going in circles; and I don’t suppose in the end that it matters whether I am correct, you are correct or there are shades of “correctness” in both…
Unknown Shredder
March 25, 2016 @ 8:08 pm
Well, I sure don’t need to hear that song again.
Is this song going to take up one of the slots on the new album???
I’m feeling a little iffy as to what he’s up to and direction after listening to that cover.
Trigger
March 25, 2016 @ 8:12 pm
Yes, it’s a single to be featured on the album.
Unknown Shredder
March 25, 2016 @ 8:34 pm
Okay, thanks.
Really liked his last 2 albums so I’m sure I will get this one as well.
It’s hard to like every track on majority of albums I guess
karl
March 26, 2016 @ 2:47 pm
I kinda like this. I have tried way too hard to like this guy. But have had a hard time understanding what he’s saying. I prefer High top Mountain over metamodern sounds. But, at least for this song, this is pretty good.
Orgirl1
March 26, 2016 @ 3:27 pm
I like this more than Brace for Impact. But then, I liked Nirvanna. I was also going to write a huge definition/rant of the word “hipster”, but I think I’ll pass.
Cowboyal
March 26, 2016 @ 5:24 pm
I just don’t get it.
I listened to the song and it is simply not very good.
I read your review but 95% has nothing to do with the actual song. You basically discuss the relationship between Nirvana and their fans.
I feel myself stuck in the middle – somewhere in between the dumbed down version of country music that has generally ruled the airwaves these last few years and the arty niche artists like Sturgill Simpson that some critics, such as yourself, rave on about but upon listening to them I find boring and unappealing.
I believe an artist like Sturgill Simpson, even if given mass exposure by the media, will not be able to make it big in the mainstream. His music is just not accessible enough for a mass audience.
I will end this post as I began it, I just don’t get it.
Before FM
March 26, 2016 @ 6:23 pm
I’m waiting for the album as a whole. This single at a time, for an album supposedly as life lesson for his son is like reviewing a (insert favorite author here) book as it is released a chapter at a time. IMO.
HelloWalls
March 26, 2016 @ 11:03 pm
Country, Rock and Blues all wrapped into one. Video’s a little out there though. A deeper mind than mine might be able to make sense of it.
JF
March 27, 2016 @ 10:26 am
This is one of the worst things I have heard in a long time. If it didn’t have Simpson’s name on it, we’d all be laughing at it. Just a hot mess.
The Ghost of Buckshot Jones
March 28, 2016 @ 7:15 am
As someone who routinely cranked Nirvana alongside Waylon Jennings in his truck in High School in the 90s, this makes me happy. As someone who also got accused of singing with a twang when performing back then, when in reality all I was doing was aping Cobain’s vocal style, this is fun.
Mike Rutherford
April 1, 2016 @ 11:57 pm
You sound somewhat like me. I was cranking “Honky Tonk Heroes” & a TON of David Allan Coe and a TON of Nirvana from my sophomore to senior years of high school. (Also, I was a MASSIVE fan of the Afghan Whigs due to the fact that they were just another local band that played here in KY all the time, based out of Cincinnati and I went to all of their pre-fame shows and me and friends would often hang out with them at all night pizza joints/pool halls after their Sunday night all-ages gigs. I was all of 15/16 and “Congregation” still my fave of theirs. By 1993 and their breakthrough “Gentlemen”? I was a whopping 17 and so happy to see them taking off on a national level. Though I did see Nirvana once pre-fame? They were relatively tame to how much the ‘Whig’s blew me away EVERY SINGLE TIME I saw them live pre-fame. Oh, the stories that I could tell…God, those were amazing days/times)….
But yeah, a friend of mine beat me to the punch and purchased the only cassette copy of “Nevermind” that our local record store had (they also had a CD copy but none of us had CD players at that time). He was a couple of years older and was already driving and was playing it non-stop in his car and I thought “my GOD – this is a F’N GREAT album – this is “Doolittle”, but even BETTER)! The album reminded me of the Pixies cover of “Head On” – only even better and over the course of an entire LP. I actually made a HUGE asshole move and “snuck” the cassette home one evening w/out permission so I could dub it. My friend showed up the next night and I don’t think he ever quite liked me as much afterwards (not that I could blame him – it WAS a total dick move).
I managed to buy the album as soon as the local record shop got in one more copy (still pre-“Teen Spirit”/fame) and I wore it the hell out. Strange thing though? I usually skipped the very song that put them on the map. I just NEVER DID love “Teen Spirit”. Did NOT hate it. Just thought that every other song on the album was better.
Loved everything they released (from “Incesticide” to “In Utero”). I knew that w/”Utero” and using Albini, Kurt was trying to dial things back – not entirely – but to some degree. But DAMN. MTV constantly played “Heart Shaped Box” & “All Apologies” and that album was still huge. At that point? I don’t think Kurt could entirely break away from his songwriting formula – it was simply a part of his DNA, so to speak. He tried like HELL even more with the “Unplugged” session, and I’ll be damned if I don’t think that that just might be the greatest recording he left behind. Even those (great but quirky as hell – if you have heard the originals, you know EXACTLY what I mean) tracks from the Meat Puppets II album – Kurt somehow made them sound amazing. In the process, he turned the Meat Puppets into a household name and, if you want to see what sudden success can do to even a veteran band, this is an absolutely amazingly brutal & very DARK read (http://www.phoenixnewtimes.com/news/shooting-star-6421612 ). Even beyond that article, things degenerated even further before ultimately turning into a story of redemption.
I am looking very forward to checking out this new Sturgill album. I have a feeling that if me and him were to sit down and have a conversation? It would go on for a LONG while and we would have a hell of a lot in common.
mark
March 28, 2016 @ 10:53 am
Sturgill could probably sing anything in pop music. The guy can really sing.
And this tune gets better each time I listen to it.
Sturgill’s last three tunes I’ve heard at SCM.com have been outstanding.
A step up, maybe a refining of what he was doing with Turtles all the way down.
The guy is definitely inspired these days.
I’d give him a complete pass on saying different things at different times. It doesn’t matter… just listen to the music.
Charlie
March 29, 2016 @ 9:17 am
I would have preferred more Beatles, less Smithereens. The drums let it down, the strings/horns seem a little confused.
But I like what he is going for. Should have been recorded at Abbey Road is all.
mark
March 30, 2016 @ 8:17 am
The video/short film looks like a depiction of a Sturgill’s journey through life…. led by a strange creature, into the sky, below the sea, love, love damaged and reborn many times, violence, innocence, music exploding in his ears and head, and ending by going home.
beautiful video. The man/creature with the strange head looks very familiar.
Buying this album is an easy decision for me. looking forward to that.
Mike Rutherford
April 2, 2016 @ 12:13 am
One more thing about Sturgill – and specifically “Metamodern”….He actually reminds me in some ways of the Red Hot Chili Peppers John Frusciante. Frusciante is absolutely THE reason that that band blew up like they did in the early 90’s. However, sorta like Sturgill? He was always his own person. He HATED fame, loved the smaller club shows and wanted things to be like that forever. Yet, he had this amazing gift of coming up with material that, once filtered through the other 3 guys? It could be turned into pure pop-radio & MTV brilliance.
It’s when one listens to Frusciante’s MANY brilliant solo albums (up to and including “The Empyrean”) that one truly understands how “different” yet simultaneously brilliant Frusciante truly was. As a pure guitarist, few can compare as he was a disciple of the all-time greatest IMO (Hendrix) as well as the quirky yet brilliant Zappa (he actually had an offer to join Zappa’s band but turned it down because he wanted to use drugs and Zappa had a strict “no drug” policy).
While Frusciante’s solo material is more “out there” (especially albums like Niandra Lades & Usually Just a T-Shirt”), I can still draw some parallels between Nirvana, Frusciante and Sturgill’s Metamodern album. Check out “Running Away Into You” by Frusciante (there are also tracks where he employs backwards guitar-tracking on the same album) and, while I might be wrong? I think that Sturgill, along with loving him some Nirvana very possibly also loved himself some Frusciante. While it’s technically not exactly the same? I just get that VIBE.
Sturgill could do very little to really surprise me at this point in his career. I think his range of influences are incredibly diverse and w/him being only a couple of years my junior? He was almost assuredly growing up on a large portion of the very same stuff that I was as well.
RedDirtCyclone
April 7, 2016 @ 10:28 pm
Sailor’s Guide to Earth is on NPR now. FANTASTIC ALBUM! Love it all. We only have 2 more Sturgill records to enjoy folks,
Is it pure country? Heck no, Is great damn music? Yes!
Mike
April 23, 2016 @ 11:32 am
‘“In Bloom” was Nirvana spilling its frustration on how the message they were trying to convey through their music was being lost on its audience. Their ideology was being diluted by the sheer number of people it was reaching. They were fed up that a portion, or even a majority of Nirvana”™s “fans” were just there for the scene that had been created around the music, or the blood and guts and rawness of it all. They were tired of people assigning their own desires to what the music was saying instead of trying to interpret what the band was really trying to convey.’
My problem with your paragraph here is that it presumes that Nirvana was being heard by a wide audience when In Bloom was written. It was not. Sure, Cobain may have been struggling with what his 9000 fans thought….but it was not much more than that after Bleach. I don’t think Cobain could have reached the point of being “tired” of Nirvana fandom yet. It was just starting. I can guarantee you that, when I was working in a record store in Indiana in the early nineties, only my coolest co-worker had any idea about Nirvana when the CD came in to the store. Of course two months later every self-respecting 20 year old knew about Cobain……but not before then, and certainly not before the time that In Bloom was written.
Trigger
April 23, 2016 @ 12:17 pm
First, the message of “In Bloom” is not bred out of my personal speculation. It’s pretty universally recognized what the song is about, because that information has been corroborated through Cobain and the other band members. We know what “In Bloom” was about. And as for this idea that Nirvana wasn’t big when they wrote it, I think that’s not entirely accurate. “Bleach” was a huge underground album, and the reason the band was signed to a major label. Though they were mostly a regional band, in Seattle and the Pacific Northwest, Nirvana was very much in the public spotlight.
Now, if Sturgill wants to make the song be about something different, especially since he changed up the lyrics some, that’s totally understandable. But it doesn’t change what the original composition was. Furthermore in his recent interview, he acknowledged the original meaning. “I know what Kurt [Cobain] wrote the song about, but that wasn”™t why I picked it. I guess certain aspects of that apply to my life depending on what town we”™re in, and night to night.”
Sally
April 26, 2016 @ 10:37 am
I’m a big Nirvana fan and I thought this cover was HORRIBLE! And I was annoyed he changed the lyrics. Oh well, c’est la vie!
TwoSheds Jackson
May 3, 2016 @ 10:05 am
Hey, let’s face it, Nirvana is the greatest and everything sucked at the point that they came along. The music of MY youth is the best so suck it! So much sanctimonious shit over one goddamn song.