Taylor Swift Leaves Behind Big Machine, and a Legacy of How Women Can Succeed in Country
There is no way to sugar coat it for Scott Borchetta, Big Machine Records, and the two one-way streets just west of downtown Nashville known as Music Row where the heart of the country music industry resides. Taylor Swift choosing to move on from Big Machine—the label she’s been signed to since 2006 when she was 15-years-old—leaves a gaping hole in the country industry, even if Swift officially left the genre two albums ago. The loss of revenue for the music campus and Big Machine specifically will be felt for years to come. They have lost their biggest superstar.
Taylor Swift announced the move on Monday (11-20) about a month after her contract with Big Machine Records had officially expired. She had been negotiating with the label for months, with one big sticking point being the ability to retain ownership of her masters, and gain ownership of the masters she’s already made with the label. Swift specifically stated that one of the reasons she chose to go with Universal Music Group and Republic Records as her new label was due to the partnership allowing her to retain the masters of her music. Without getting too technical, masters are basically the ownership of the music, with labels then paying artists royalties on their work but keeping the rights.
As an independent label, Big Machine and Taylor Swift were already distributed through Universal Music Group, and even though Taylor has moved on from Big Machine, there is still the possibility she may end up reuniting with her previous masters eventually. Just as Taylor Swift was negotiating with Scott Borchetta, Scott Borchetta was negotiating with major record labels to sell the company, including with Universal. Borchetta is still pursuing a sale, even though without Taylor Swift under contract, the prize isn’t as juicy.
The news comes after what can only be characterized as a protracted losing streak for Scott Borchetta and Big Machine Records. Once coined the “Country Music Antichrist” by Saving Country Music for both the way Borchetta was gobbling up market share at an alarming pace, and his propensity to promote artists who had little to do with country music (Florida Georgia Line, et al.), Borchetta hit a rough patch in early 2017, and hasn’t wielded the same amount of power since.
It came as a shock to many when in February of 2017, Tim McGraw chose to move from Big Machine to Sony Music Nashville. Borchetta had worked hard to wrestle McGraw away from Curb Records, including a protracted legal battle. Then just a month later, Big Machine was forced to shutter their Dot Records imprint, which was home to artists such as Maddie & Tae, and Drake White.
After significant growth in Big Machine necessitated Scott Borchetta sprouting imprints left and right, including restarting the legacy Dot imprint in 2014, he now was forced into downsizing as Big Machine’s management structure got so stretched it began to unravel, and too many projects weren’t making the label money. Big Machine’s partnership with Cumulus Media on the NASH Icon imprint meant to offer radio support for older artists such as Hank Williams Jr. and Ronnie Dunn also seems to only be limping along at best. Cumulus is currently in Chapter 11 bankruptcy restructuring itself.
Now you add the loss of Taylor Swift, and it’s another devastating blow to Big Machine, who at one point looked like it might take over Music Row and country music. It still has ownership of Taylor Swift songs that were responsible for selling some 32 million albums just in the United States, but that is an asset of diminishing returns, especially in the streaming era.
But Taylor Swift moving on from Big Machine deserves a deeper reflection than just the financial ramifications for a big Music Row label, and the important, but embellished (as per usual with Swift) benefit other Universal artists may receive, since Swift used her signing to strong arm Universal into agreeing to share the money with the artists if the label sells their stake in Spotify.
If it wasn’t for Taylor Swift, there would be no Big Machine Records. And if it wasn’t for Big Machine Records, there would be no Taylor Swift.
These days you can’t get away from articles showing concern with the lack of women in country music, and for good reason. Championing women in country has become the cause célèbre in many circles, with media outlets well outside the country genre joining the fray. Awareness of the problem is no longer an issue. In fact the case could be made the issue has been run into the ground, resulting in it becoming too adversarial to find any pragmatic solutions for it, while potentially scaring some women away from pursuing a career in country music at all, exacerbating the problem.
You’ll find all kinds of of news stories about how women aren’t played on the radio, women aren’t considered for festivals, women aren’t given equal treatment to their male counterparts, and how women can expect to face sexual harassment and other potentially dangerous scenarios if they choose a career in country music—just like Taylor Swift did when a DJ who groped her. But what you won’t hear are the stories of how women can and have succeeded in the genre, despite the odds and adversity they face. In fact if you attempt to highlight the positive stories, you run the risk of being cast as part of the problem. And there is no greater success story for women in country music than Taylor Swift.
Understand that Taylor Swift was just 14-years-old when Scott Borchetta first saw her perform at the Bluebird Cafe in Nashville, and he was so enamored, decided to start an entire record label around her. Forget that Swift was a women trying to make it in country, Taylor Swift couldn’t even legally drive at the time. And to make it, Taylor would have to rely on a label with no track record, no clout, and no roster except for Swift herself. Scott was no stranger to the record label business, but he was trying upstage the country music industry and go against the grain of Music Row norms—something that has been tried many times over the decades, and often failed.
Taylor Swift’s odds were impossible, yet her first record has now sold over 5 million copies. Her second record, the aptly-named Fearless, has sold 7 million, and won the Grammy for Album of the Year. Swift’s 2010 Record Speak Now was solely written and co-produced by Swift herself, and also won two Grammy Awards. Not only is Taylor Swift one of only seven women to win the CMA for Entertainer of the Year in its 52 year history, she won it twice.
Yes, we all know that Taylor Swift is not country, and arguably never was, though compared to much of today’s country music, this argument feels irrelevant. And no matter how you feel about her music, true country fans will always owe Taylor Swift a debt of gratitude, however begrudgingly so, for being one of the very few artists in modern country history to come clean about the nature of her music, and move on to pop just as they had requested. She proved why this was not only important, but could be a pathway to even greater success.
Despite incredible, arguably insurmountable odds Taylor Swift faced, she was able to persevere through the Music Row system, and rise to the point of becoming one of the biggest artists in all of popular music, with so much clout and power, she was able to negotiate a contract with some of the most favorable concessions any artist has ever earned, including potentially helping out hundreds of other artists if and when a Spotify sale goes through.
Taylor Swift became so damn big, country music couldn’t contain her. And neither could Music Row. And she did it all while starting in country music as a woman, and as a young woman. And so could others, including artists that actually sound country, if like Taylor Swift they possess unique talents that fit the time and place of their ascent perfectly. But they also have to believe in themselves more than believing it is impossible for a woman to make it in country music, just like Taylor Swift did. Only then will they be fearless enough to succeed.
Trigger
November 20, 2018 @ 10:28 am
TAYLOR SWIFT’S NOT COUNTRY!!!
There I said it. Now let’s move on.
King Honky Of Crackershire
November 20, 2018 @ 10:44 am
Then why write the article?
Trigger
November 20, 2018 @ 11:21 am
Because it’s my fucking website and I’ll write about whatever the fuck I want to write about.
David
November 20, 2018 @ 12:22 pm
Let him have it, Trig!
King Honky Of Crackershire
November 20, 2018 @ 2:49 pm
Why are you deleting me?
Trigger
November 20, 2018 @ 2:59 pm
Because you and others are turning these comments sections into slag pits instead of forums for discussion, and then I’m the one who has to answer for it any time I go on Twitter and get hounded down as a racist Nazi, not you. You want to troll these comments sections? Then let the game to come to you instead of trying to rush to get the first comment in. This is a country music website, not a forum for you and others to vent your anger at society. You’re lucky I still keep your ass around because believe it or not, I think your perspective has value. And by the way, I only deleted one comment here, and it was because you left a comment that was exactly the same.
And if you have to ask why a story on the biggest artist on Music Row leaving her label is important to country music, then you don’t understand what this website is all about.
Brian B
November 29, 2018 @ 9:00 am
Taylor Swift leaving country? Isn’t this at least somewhat similar to the outcry when Dylan left traditional folk music of his “Blowin’ in the Wind” days to the hard rock sound of such songs as “Like a Rolling Stone”. And he was booed off the stage of the Newport Folk Festival.
Brian
November 20, 2018 @ 10:45 am
If hitting a rough patch means getting offered 250 to 300 million for your company please give me directions to that road. No way he was giving her masters back. Genius.
Biggest Al Downing
November 21, 2018 @ 9:46 am
Given Taylor’s deal with Universal, I’d wager that Ms. Swift will end up with all of her master’s when it is all said and done. Kudos to Scott Borchetta if he milks that kind of $ from a sale of the label. #nothappening
JB-Chicago
November 20, 2018 @ 10:57 am
She is one of the sharpest music business minds of her generation. She knows and always talks about the importance of the “album” in full as an artistic expression. Gained my respect for that alone, not just the songs and or the masters, publishing etc…. She wants total control and she’s earned that right at this point.
Brian B
November 29, 2018 @ 9:02 am
In the beginning she no doubt had as models two other women who also started their careers at a tender age and became on the verge of superstars: Tanya Tucker and LeAnn Rimes.
Brian B
November 29, 2018 @ 9:04 am
In the respect of wanting and demanding total control of the music, haven’t we heard this one somewhere before? Oh, yes, that was also the mantra of the late, great Waylon Jennings. It worked pretty well for him for a very long time. But even he aged out of commercial success with time.
TwangBob
November 20, 2018 @ 11:06 am
Borchetta should have given Swift all of her masters if that was the only negotiation point in contention in keeping her on his label. However, as pointed out, Big Machine isn’t worth as much to a buyer with its top artist leaving the company. I’m surprised Swift didn’t just buy them outright but I guess Scott wants to hold onto those masters as a bargaining chip for the label sale. I wonder how much Big Machine is worth without Swift on the label?
Dragin
November 20, 2018 @ 11:11 am
I wonder if Scott Borchetta wil remove We Are Never Ever Getting Back Together from the office playlist?
Fuzzy TwoShirts
November 20, 2018 @ 11:15 am
Halle-Freaking-Lujah!
Hopefully Borchetta takes the hint and gets the heck out of dodge and stops screwing up Country Music.
King Honky Of Crackershire
November 20, 2018 @ 11:18 am
Puke. Vomit. Barf.
Fuzzy TwoShirts
November 20, 2018 @ 11:18 am
and if it weren’t for Big Machine records, Country Music would be a hell of a lot better off.
AT
November 20, 2018 @ 11:24 am
Excellent article….just wanted to point out that Barbara Mandrell was the first woman to score two CMA Entertainer of the Year wins in 80 + 81….Taylor became the second.
Jamie
November 20, 2018 @ 1:57 pm
Actually, Mandrell was the first artist – male or female – to win EOTY twice. I vividly remember seeing an ad in TV Guide for Barbara Mandrell & The Mandrell Sisters. It boldly proclaimed “The only rwo-time Entertainer Of The Year!”
And BTW…where are HER masters? Most of Mandrell’s MCA/Dot/ABC albums have never been released on CD. It’s a shame how her catalog has been so poorly curated over the years. Especially given that she’s in the Country Music Hall Of Fame.
Randy Allen
November 20, 2018 @ 3:57 pm
Amen to that!! Her full catalog needs to be released.
hoptowntiger94
November 20, 2018 @ 12:16 pm
So what’s the long play? Universal eventually buys Big Machine and sells the masters back to Swift?
Paulo
November 20, 2018 @ 12:16 pm
Love Taylor, she’s a trailblazer.
Now, Trigger, are you aware Kane Brown dethroned Bebe Rexha from Hot Country Songs’ #1?
Fuzzy TwoShirts
November 20, 2018 @ 1:16 pm
In other news my toilet was full of crap and I flushed another crap that knocked the first one out of the pipe
bill weiler
November 20, 2018 @ 3:22 pm
Next time I plug my pipes, I’m inviting you over for dinner. My wife’s burritos should do the trick
Trigger
November 20, 2018 @ 2:49 pm
Yes, I’m aware.
Amy Chen
November 20, 2018 @ 12:17 pm
Also shoutout to Taylor for requiring UMG to distribute the $$ from Spotify shares they sell to the artists on their roster as part of her new deal.
You can be cynical and say it’s just more $$ for her and some good press but it’s still a cool thing to do.
MH
November 20, 2018 @ 12:21 pm
Daddy Swift is part owner of Big Machine (he bankrolled the startup capital and therefore owns a stake) so she owns the masters anyway through her father.
Trigger
November 20, 2018 @ 3:03 pm
Taylor Swift’s dad bought a 3% stake in the company for $12,000. The idea that he bankrolled Big Machine is a bit of an embellishment. It was actually Toby Keith who got Big Machine off the ground, and continues to profiteer from his investment as his own label Show Dog limps along.
Camerpn
November 20, 2018 @ 12:30 pm
MOAR WOMENZ IN COUNTREEEEEE
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
altaltcountry
November 20, 2018 @ 1:13 pm
The following is not about the “TS is not country” issue per se but about mass marketing and authentic country music, but bear with me.
I like well-crafted, honest pop music, but I can’t stand crafty, calculated pablum performed just to sell copies to a mass audience. Whenever someone’s immediately popular, I do my best to ignore them. So far I haven’t heard an entire song by Katy Perry, Ariana Grande, Milli Vanilli, Justin Bieber, etc., and until today Taylor Swift. I made some comments relegating Taylor to the “feel-good pop” category in another thread, and decided after reading the above column to give her a try. Maybe her early country-oriented stuff was the real thing. So I slogged through the first 2 albums. Frankly, I’m at a loss as to why she was considered country in the first place, except that her family moved from Pennsylvania to Nashville to give her a shot at breaking into the music BUSINESS.
But that’s not my point. Nor is my point that her music is artificially colored and flavored cotton candy with no soul. That’s just my personal taste, and others may feel differently. It is that I don’t credit her with promoting “women in country music” simply because she successfully navigated (or co-navigated) Music Row. To my ear at least, her goal since she was 14 was to become a superstar, not to create or encourage good music. Look at how she milked the Kanye West spat to garner more media attention than she or Kanye or their music deserved.
Swedish pop musicians like First Aid Kit (“Emmylou”) or Anna Ternheim (“The Night Visitor”) or Melissa Horn have shown how artists with no (physical) American roots whatsoever can be inspired by country music and then use that inspiration to create honest and moving popular music that doesn’t water down the achievements of their influences. Of course they’re not likely to become superstars, but that was never their goal in the first place.
Marketing isn’t itself the problem (country stars have marketed themselves and their image since the early days). But it isn’t the solution either. Open discussions like those on Saving Country Music will do far more to promote honest country music by all genders, races, ages, etc. than any Music Row ad campaign.
Pete Marshall
November 20, 2018 @ 2:38 pm
Great article Trigger it’s well said.
StraitOuttaNashville
November 21, 2018 @ 12:08 am
As much as we all don’t think Taylor was ever Country Music we have to give her and her family credit for her success. I mean she was 14 at the time she got started and became arguably the biggest musical artist on earth by the time she was 25. Taylor wrote all her own music and the genre argument aside is one of most talented artists we have ever seen, ever! I never cared for her music at any point but talent is talent, on top of how incredibly smart she is. I remember a lot of people, myself included, begging her to just “go Pop”, and she did and is on top of that genre too. Most of these artists, in my opinion, like FGL or Sam Hunt wouldn’t stand a chance in the Pop music world, and its why I think they never cross over. Taylor Swift will always have my respect for how she got to where she is today. In a world where Women struggle, she showed others how to be Fearless.
Bear
November 21, 2018 @ 2:17 am
She did not write all her own stuff on her last two albums however, just a small quibble, as plenty of great acts never wrote a song in their life. But I think she is more like Madonna a savvy business woman than a real great musical talent (especially with in the vocal arena). She knows how to sell a hook and sell herself and doesn’t get two takes about what “haters” have to say even if we are right (i.e. that last album cover was HORRENDOUS). And that too is very Madonna like.
I agree about the bros who won’t go pop. They know they don’t stand a chance again the women (or men) dominating right (even with the fuzzy chart math).
StraitOuttaNashville
November 21, 2018 @ 8:22 am
Taylor Swift has a writing credit on every track on 1989 & Reputation, and every other track that she every put on every album from my research.
peanut
November 24, 2018 @ 5:47 pm
Country was just a stepping stone on the way to going pop. Why do you think she always did promotion to pop and country? If Red wasn’t successful she would still be in country. Writing fluff isn’t talent. Her only talent is being business women.
StraitOuttaNashville
November 24, 2018 @ 10:17 pm
If it was that easy there would be a million Taylor Swift’s running around. There is a reason we have only one Taylor Swift. Just saying.
Peanut
November 26, 2018 @ 4:18 pm
If Taylor tried to go to pop from the start she would have failed. People on here give her way to much credit. Not all little girls have the advantage of having dad who helped start their career. She didn’t decide to just do pop one day and left country. She built up a pop fan base while in country. Why do you think her transition was so smooth? She didn’t get these pop fans over night. It’s much easier to go from promoting yourself to pop and country (that includes calling herself pop or country when convenient and putting your songs on pop and country radio ect..) to build up pop fan base while being on country genre than go straight to pop from the begging. Why do you think she tested how she would do with Red? It’s to see how successful she would be in pop genre. Taylor cares about image and money. If she would not have been so successful with Red she would still be in country. Taylor is terrible singer and writer/co writer. She is such below average in talent. Simply writing doesn’t take talent. Writing a good songs takes talent. Making a lot of money doesn’t make Taylor talented musically. Taylor will never be Agnes Obel (since Taylor is pop I’ll use her) in talent. Adele is a lot more impressive. She actually started her success in pop and didn’t have to use country as stepping stone.
Chris
December 1, 2018 @ 10:32 am
You’re so out of touch with reality that you keep yourself sane with delusions. Never change, please.
Charlie
November 21, 2018 @ 9:50 am
This is gonna piss Toby Keith off somethin’ fierce.
Mike
November 21, 2018 @ 9:53 am
I think that Taylor Swift leaving Big Machine was the most foregone conclusion in music history. No way she was staying there when she’s about to hit enormous paydirt. More power to her.
I still believe her dad brought her way and that Swifturds are one of the most annoying fan bases in music history, though
Black Boots
November 21, 2018 @ 12:24 pm
Taylor and Big Machine are never ever ever getting back together.
For the Birds
November 21, 2018 @ 2:55 pm
I wouldn’t be surprised at all if UMG or Taylor buys Big Machine to get those masters.
liza
November 21, 2018 @ 5:30 pm
“And she did it all while starting in country music as a woman, and as a young woman. And so could others, including artists that actually sound country, if like Taylor Swift they possess unique talents that fit the time and place of their ascent perfectly. But they also have to believe in themselves more than believing it is impossible for a woman to make it in country music, just like Taylor Swift did. Only then will they be fearless enough to succeed.”
I bet you’ve never felt the need to write this about aspiring male artists.
Conrad Fisher
November 22, 2018 @ 9:25 am
Please explain.
altaltcountry
November 22, 2018 @ 11:24 am
I think she may mean that you don’t have to tell aspiring male artists to believe in themselves because the system’s already stacked in their favor. If that’s not what Liza meant, it’s close to what I believe.
My two cents: Even minority male artists who encounter resistance because of their ethnicity have a built-in advantage over female artists. I doubt that anyone in the music business is saying “Let’s keep women out.” More likely they’re thinking something like “women are not as profitable as men in country music” or “there’s less demand for female artists.” So they invest less in promoting women, or they play fewer women on the radio, so their stereotypes seem true. Women who promote themselves CAN succeed big-time if they promote their image successfully (like Swift and Musgraves). But female artists who want to succeed based on the quality of their music alone are at a disadvantage. The problem isn’t that they don’t believe in themselves–it’s that they don’t believe in selling themselves at the expense of their music.
Conrad Fisher
November 22, 2018 @ 1:43 pm
That is fair.
I am very confused about the whole conversation surrounding women in the music industry. I don’t pretend to understand what it would be like to be a woman in the music industry. I know they face obstacles I can’t imagine.
I also believe that a good song is a good song is a good song, no matter who wrote it. There are people working in the industry who welcome a good song no matter where it comes from. Chicks with Hits comes to mind. https://musicrow.com/2018/04/nashvilles-chicks-with-hits-song-plugging-group-to-celebrate-20-years/
I think it’s important to defend women and their work in the music industry, and equally important not to promote a female artist/writer’s work simply because there aren’t enough of women being played on country radio. I recognize that sounds a little stupid considering the steaming pile country radio has become, but my point still stands. I feel like Trigger has written an article addressing this point, but I’m not sure.
He has written several articles on booking women at festivals that add value to the conversation. Here’s a link to one.
https://savingcountrymusic.com/twitter-trolling-is-hurting-not-helping-the-cause-for-women-at-country-festivals/
It’s a complicated conversation. I hope I don’t sound like a jerk here. I wonder what Loretta Lynn would have to say about it.
John Lomax III
November 28, 2018 @ 7:31 pm
Don’t forget, Taylor was very well financed and at the time Big Machine started, Scott was also running Toby Keith’s Big Dog Records, weirdly competing with himself, working on building a superstar and also maintaining and enhancing Toby’s career. That did not last long and I hear in the rumor mill that when Scott and Toby went their respective ways, Toby, got a piece of the action on Taylor as he had invested in her early on.
Chris Matthew
December 16, 2018 @ 11:00 pm
Sounds like the rambling of a conspiracy theorist.
Matthew
December 6, 2018 @ 9:59 pm
This a load of bullcrap. As if funding the company for 3% isnankrolling her entire career
liza
June 30, 2019 @ 12:13 pm
https://www.billboard.com/articles/news/8518131/taylor-swift-scooter-braun-big-machine-catalog-response