The Civil Wars Tension Creates Confusion For Fans
The importance of authenticity and realism in country and roots music cannot be overstated. And as you work your way down the musical food chain from big stadium acts like Kenny Chesney and Taylor Swift, to more artistically-minded acts like The Civil Wars, all the way down to the guy playing guitar down at the local bar, that authenticity becomes even more important in the minds of listeners.
We like to think of musical duos and groups as troupes of kindred souls that get together to share the musical experience, and that we are simply the fortunate voyeurs who get to peer into their reality and share in their joy. In truth, most musical enterprises are burdened with some sort of tension and conflict, even if it only exists in the short term. From the outside looking in, fans are often confounded why certain musical pairings can’t tough it out through conflict for the good of the music (and for the project’s financial gain), but the melding of music and egos can be such a perilous thing, the stories of musical collaborations sticking it out in the long term is more of the exception than the rule.
These issues become compounded when you’re dealing with a musical relationship that has become much more than a duo or group, but a major entertainment franchise whose name constitutes a financial mint that sometimes millions of dollars has been invested in by record labels, promoters, and other backers.
Like big banks, many times these franchises become “too big to fail,” and performers must fight through bad blood and tension, sometimes for years, to keep the franchise going, sometimes against their will because of financial or contractual obligation.
Brooks & Dunn were said to be beset with this type of unbearable tension for a period before their eventual break up, reportedly not speaking to each other off the stage near the end. Superstar trio Lady Antebellum had to hire a mediator in their early days—a sharp contrast to the smiling faces on stage that would allude to the idea that the three members are friends. In truth Lady Antebellum and many of country music’s big acts should be characterized more as carefully orchestrated business arrangements instead of creative endeavors amongst friends.
And this brings us to this ongoing, unusual situation with the award-winning Americana singing duo The Civil Wars. The recently-split duo is now set to release a new album…though they’re completely open about the fact that they’re not even speaking to each other. How is a music fan, or specifically a Civil Wars fan supposed to perceive this? How can you submit to their music when you know there’s open tension between the two, especially when their music has depended so much on the intimacy the duo strikes in their singing and lyricism?
At least they’re being honest about their once dubbed “irreconcilable differences,” which is a curiosity in its own right because the term “irreconcilable” seems to allude to never reconciling, yet the duo must agree in spirit to some things to at least see this latest album out into the world. They’re even going as far as saying that they’re using the tension as a source of inspiration and muse. Is this sentiment built from sincerity, or a sales pitch to circumvent their fan’s concerns?
Some have even surmised that maybe this whole bubbling feud is simply to spark interest and intrigue in the project. Maybe they both simply have to fulfill a contract or face financial ruin, and they are simply fighting through their hate. And don’t for a second fancy The Civil Wars as a small, boutique musical franchise. Though their music may have much more of an artistic aim than mainstream country, over the years they’ve enjoyed big accolades from industry awards like the CMA’s, ACM’s, and Grammy’s, and surely have amassed much wealth from their music, and many obligations. Maybe suspicious notions of the duo are unfair, but when you’ve raised the facade on your intimate stage persona that presented the duo as kindred spirits in song, it’s hard to blame folks for wondering what else they’re not being shown.
Is it in any way possible for this collaboration and their latest album to be successful under the circumstances? One of my open criticisms of The Civil Wars over the years has been the sappiness of their presentation. I once compared it to Sonny & Cher; how in better days The Civil Wars would stare in each other’s eyes so sweetly on stage. Maybe this intense, and in many ways unnatural affection is what led to their differences becoming irreconcilable. Maybe The Civil Wars burned too bright, too quickly, found overwhelming success overnight, and now the flame is gone.
But Sonny & Cher were able to reconcile after their divorce, at least for the cameras, and at least for a while when they launched the Sonny & Cher Show in 1976. But the show eventually floundered. The chemistry between the two stars was gone, and no amount of writing and production could bring it back. Chemistry is that big unknown quotient that you can’t manufacture, and was one of the principle ingredients to The Civil Wars’ success.
What kind of money is awaiting the surviving members of Led Zeppelin if they decided to book a reunion tour? Would it be the highest grossing tour in the history of music? Possibly, but Robert Plant is perfectly content playing big clubs and small theaters with his Band of Joy. Why? Because the experience feels more real to him. When I look at the eyes of The Civil Wars’ John Paul White, that is what I see—a yearning to return to the days when it was about the creative process and intimate crowds. While in Joy Williams I see a woman who wants to make the world her oyster; not wanting to give up on what the duo has already built. Of course, these are all personal perceptions. What the reality is, that’s anyone’s guess. But it’s the perceptions, not the reality, that may be the duo’s biggest problem.
In the end, whatever you may read on the internet or in magazines has no bearing on the quality of the music The Civil Wars release. But then again, everything you read and know about The Civil Wars has everything to do with how that music will be perceived. The Civil Wars are not Jason Aldean or Toby Keith, and can’t rely on a passive audience who suspends disbelief as a matter of habit to resolve the lack of authenticity from their favorite artists. The Civil Wars appeal to an elevated, active music listener. And that may be The Civil Wars circa 2013’s biggest hurdle when it comes to presenting their new music, and having you believe it.
Keith L.
July 24, 2013 @ 8:35 am
I heard a quote from Joy Williams the other day that stated that if you want to learn about the problems in their relationship, you should listen to the album. “Wish you were the one” being the most notable.
Trigger
July 24, 2013 @ 10:36 am
But roughly half the album was written and recorded before the breakup. So what are we to make of those songs?
Keith L.
July 24, 2013 @ 11:18 am
Not sure, concept album maybe?
Keith L.
July 24, 2013 @ 12:24 pm
http://bit.ly/1aSVE4D
Jack Williams
July 24, 2013 @ 5:54 pm
This comment on that article resonates with me:
“Complete and total bullshit…doesn’t say a word about what really happened…and I don’t care…their music is good, the drama makes it not-worth-following…end of story…lots of great music that eclipses theirs…”
Keith L.
July 25, 2013 @ 10:55 am
Hey, don’t get pissed at me! I’m just posting the article!
Jack Williams
July 25, 2013 @ 11:32 am
Oh, I’m not at all getting pissed with you. I just copied and pasted the first comment someone left on the American Songwriter article, as it sums up sort of how I feel about this whole Civil Wars situation. I don’t feel as quite as intense as that guy did, maybe because I’m not that into them to start with.I
Keith L.
July 25, 2013 @ 1:08 pm
I hear you. I like to hear “Barton Holler” on the radio, but I’ve never bought any of their stuff
MJBods
July 24, 2013 @ 8:58 am
What ever the drive behind it, it’s working on a marketing level because I’m more curious now to listen to their new album. The video seems to be trying to portray a Fleetwood Mac-ish tension. And I love Fleetwood Mac.
Trigger
July 24, 2013 @ 9:38 am
See, there you go. But where does the marketing end, and the music begin?
Jon
July 24, 2013 @ 10:15 am
I’m intrigued by the whole thing. They’ll get my money.
But if this turns into more manufactured drama than truth and heartbreak, they’ve done so for the last time. That’s quite a risk, isn’t it?
Trigger
July 24, 2013 @ 10:34 am
I don’t personally think the drama is manufactured. They canceled a tour right in the middle (though Joy Williams’ baby came into the picture somewhere around there). But the way they are handling it seems to be manufactured in the way they are using it as some sort of marketing point, and I think that in itself is somewhat disingenuous.
Jeremy
July 24, 2013 @ 7:23 pm
I think Joys baby came before the tour, and right after Bonnaroo, but I’m sure bring a new mother may have changed the group dynamic in some way. I hope these two figure it out though. They are one of my favorites.
Lunchbox
July 24, 2013 @ 12:27 pm
i’ve got a feelin the album is gonna be shit and they know it. that’s why they’re going with this Lifetime Channel angle,whether it’s manufactured or not. it’s too bad,i really liked the first record..i was really rooting for these guys.
Casey198
July 24, 2013 @ 1:12 pm
Great article and a very interesting point made. I think this is the sort of thing that can really turn people off to an artist, particularly when it’s so strained to the point of being just a cash grab (not to say that’s what’s going on here). Other times, the tension might could push people creatively (The Kinks, Oasis….maybe) but that’s probably pretty rare. I think people eventually people tire of it though, or feel that the wool’s being pulled over their eyes.
On a somewhat related note, I noticed that Unkown Hinson has decided to tour/record again. Last I heard he was done, period. I’m glad, of course, but a little curious on the details….
Anyway, I really enjoy this site, and appreciate the cause. I hope you never hang it up.
Trigger
July 25, 2013 @ 8:09 am
Thanks for the heads up on the Unknown Hinson news.
TX Music Jim
July 24, 2013 @ 4:43 pm
Not on purpose manufactured for marketing BUT the people charged with marketing this record are going to use it to create buzz for the project. They’d be nuts if they didn’t. Might it turn people against the artist ? Perhaps but the general public tend to be suckers for drama. Sad part is if played wrong could be a bad thing for the current boom in the interest of roots music in general.
mike
July 24, 2013 @ 8:10 pm
Honestly, if this is Manufactured, will I feel deceived, Yes will this stop me from buying their satuff no, they make good music.
Dag
July 25, 2013 @ 4:46 am
I think the dude should go out on his own and do more of that heartfelt blues stuff. He’s got a great voice. She is way too sweet for my tastes–angelic pipes though she may have.
Tony
July 25, 2013 @ 6:39 pm
I really enjoyed your article. I am a big fan of the band, and cant wait for the new record. I never knew that about Brooks and Dunn. Very interesting. I also like the Sonny and Cher comparison. I recently wrote an article on the band and drew a similar comparison to Stevie Nicks and Lindsey Buckingham of Fleetwood Mac. I would love to have you check it out!
http://themusicroom.me/choosing-sides-on-the-civil-wars-i-wish-i-didnt-know/
Josh
July 26, 2013 @ 6:37 am
Am I the only one that thinks these two were involved romantically, and since they’re both married that caused the problem? Just curious…
Maria
July 26, 2013 @ 5:08 pm
Totally agree. In their earlier interviews and live shows there were far too many awkward mentions of their separate marriages to believe it wasn’t a case of “protesting too much”. Barton Hollow is one of my all time favorite albums and I love their songwriting and the incredible blend of their voices. And John Paul White is a fantastic musician. I hope they continue making music together.
Anna
July 26, 2013 @ 8:32 am
“When I look at the eyes of The Civil Wars”™ John Paul White, that is what I see””a yearning to return to the days when it was about the creative process and intimate crowds. While in Joy Williams I see a woman who wants to make the world her oyster; not wanting to give up on what the duo has already built.”
I think you’ve got this right. John hasn’t sent out a tweet in a long time and is only speaking about this record through a spokesperson. Joy is willing to promote the album properly; attending record label parties in New York, inviting morning shows into her home to discuss the album, doing newspaper interviews.
Joy and her family were photographed spending a few days at Taylor Swift’s summer house in Rhode Island recently: http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/79801182.html I’m not sure if they’re considering writing more material together, but Joy is obviously ambitious and wants to make the most of her newfound opportunities.
Acca Dacca
July 26, 2013 @ 12:44 pm
Speaking of the importance of authenticity, what are your thoughts on Chris LeDoux, Trig? He’s one of my favorites from the 90’s.
Trigger
July 26, 2013 @ 5:53 pm
Chris LeDoux and Keith Whitely are two guys I get charged with not talking about enough, probably because they’ve both passed and there hasn’t been any real current events to bring their names up. Both are great guys and deserve more due and attention. I think Whitely will be in the Hall of Fame eventually. Maybe not LeDoux, but he taught country music how you didn’t need the industry to be successful.
Acca Dacca
July 29, 2013 @ 2:42 pm
Well, perhaps an article focusing on authenticity with LeDoux and Whitely at the forefront is in order? After all, you frequently point out that many modern country artists aren’t the real deal (such as Florida Georgia Line and their most recent song, “Round Here”). Of course, that opens a whole other can of worms, depending on what stance the article might take (such as Johnny Cash staging his Folsom Prison photo). Just a thought.
michiel
July 27, 2013 @ 3:52 am
Seems to me that the artist name Civil Wars was chosen pretty well. I like their music, but I don’t expect this new cd to be anywhere near as good. It sounds like a contract-thing to me, and it could even damage both their individual career-plans. Worst case scenario.
In a good duo the partners make each other better. One plus one is more than two, and the best I’ve seen that was with Stacey Earle and Mark Stuart, When I first saw them I really thought I saw sparks fly between them, while their voices and guitar-picking are totally different, but perfectly fit together. A couple of years ago they announced that after may many years of touring together, they would musically go their own way. But that divorce didn’t work out and very soon they were back doing it together, which is better, and I hope they’ll be doing it as long as they can.
Don’t expect that with the Civil Wars.
Ross CMR
July 30, 2013 @ 8:28 pm
People focus too much on their personal lives and romance and less on the actual quality of thier music which in my opinion hasnt changed a bit. Their video for “Same old Same old” proves it http://smarturl.it/CWSameOld
The Civil Wars – Album Review | For The Country Record
August 9, 2013 @ 9:00 am
[…] record under these circumstances has raised some eyebrows and a lot of questions, most notably from Saving Country Music, asking whether these supposed differences are simply well-articulated publicity, or whether they […]
Rachel
October 26, 2013 @ 10:20 am
I watched Joy become cloyingly The Queen of a Country Named Drama. Her voice was contrived and in her head rather than vulnerable.
Her clever curations began to sound weary. I was wary that their endearing moments on stage were bags of chips and zesty burps behind the curtain.