Why Daily and Real-Time Music Charts Are Now Necessary
2015 has been back loaded with big events and even bigger releases that have caused renewed interest in the charts used to measure the popularity and impact of music. The problem is, in this here-and-now world, the model for how music is measured is still based around walking to a newsstand on Monday, and picking up the latest Billboard, or waiting for Tuesday when the album charts are updated online. And by that time, whatever big musical event that went down last week is already old news.
When country songwriter Chris Stapleton won big at the CMA Awards on November 4th, we witnessed one of the biggest post-award sales bumps in history. Sales for his Traveller album and the song “Tennessee Whiskey” skyrocketed. But it was left to estimates and prognostications to glean just how much the sales spike was until the new charts came out. What were the sales broken down on a daily basis so we could see just how Stapleton’s meteoric rise took shape? That information isn’t made available to the general public.
Adele’s 25 has been named the best-selling album upon its debut in American history, with sales of 3.38 million, and followed it up with another record-breaking million-plus sales week. So much for major album sales being a thing of the past. But when the new Billboard 200 sales chart was published on Monday (12-6) and was updated online Tuesday, it was already old news. Due to so much speculation and prognostication surrounding where Adele’s sales would land, Billboard didn’t wait until Monday to let the public know. As soon as everything was finalized by Billboard‘s point-of-sale tracking partner Neilsen Music on Saturday night, Billboard immediately published the information online. Previously, Billboard had started releasing some official sales stats on Sunday night to stay ahead of other publishers and public speculation.
Along with the hyper interest in the sales performance of marquee releases and fast-rising stars, Billboard and other chart managers have to worry about the growing business of estimating sales and competition from real-time charts provided by music sellers directly. Wait to release sales info until Monday, and sometimes the story is already old hat. Sites like HITS Daily Double offer fans, media, and industry a building album sales chart updated daily with estimates of sales built from point-of-sale tracking history and actual sales numbers, giving readers a fairly accurate view of what they can expect from next week’s charts many days before they’re made official. iTunes charts and rankings on Amazon update in real-time (or hourly), and more and more these measurements are being cited by labels, artists, and publicists as accomplishments as they attempt to buzz certain projects.
But in the rush to be first to report on sales numbers, accuracy can get lost, and manipulations can build into the market. To claim a #1 on the iTunes charts, all one artist or band has to do is win a given hour. Tasking fans to purchase a single or an album within a short window can result in an iTunes chart #1 that doesn’t necessarily paint an accurate picture of the true appeal of a record or single. There’s a constant effort by the industry to make artists and bands look bigger than they actually are. If someone can claim a #1 or a Top 5 sales performance, this can create enough buzz to where other consumers will jump on the bandwagon. Adele’s early estimated sales had her peaking somewhere near 2.5 million. But with all the buzz surrounding the album, she beat those estimates by nearly one million units.
iTunes only accounts for sales on iTunes. We saw what the results can be when the system is manipulated after nationally-syndicated country DJ Bobby Bones tasked his listeners to purchase country artist Chris Janson’s “Buy Me A Boat” until it shot to #1 on iTunes. Because of the interest, Janson was able to land a major label deal, and “Buy Me A Boat” secured a nationwide single release. But the event wasn’t nearly as organic as it was portrayed. It wasn’t a single catching fire under its own volition. It was the result of a powerful DJ, and a chart that is easily manipulated by a spike in sales. Another rising star in country, Kane Brown, has also been attempting to dazzle the public with big showings on iTunes and other proprietary tracking systems.
The need for transparency, and the need for daily and real-time charts from trusted sources that take into consideration the entire marketplace and not just one sales outlet to give consumers, media, and business-to-business entities a more clear and relevant picture into the true behavior of music consumers has never been more necessary. And now with so many point-of-sale and online tools for tracking sales available through companies such as Neilsen Music and MediaBase who are keeping track of consumer activity in real time, the technological leap for creating such charts is well within reach.
It doesn’t mean the weekly charts have to go away. They will still be a way to take a more broad-based, benchmark perspective on sales activity and radio play, and will also allow the balancing of sales in historical significance compared to previous years. In some ways it’s unfortunate we live in such a fast-paced and easily-manipulated environment that real-time and daily charts from trusted entities are necessary. But it may be the best way to help everyone who cares about music navigate the new paradigm with the transparency and insight only well-regulated charts can provide.
December 6, 2015 @ 11:07 am
I think a reasonable solution would be to date the album’s time spend at Number 1. We already do that, but if every “number one” album came with a time spent at number one disclaimer, it could solve a lot of the problem…
Alternatively, we’d have to designate a lasting time block (say, two days, three days) that a piece of work has to hold on to that spot in order to be counted as having gone number one…
December 7, 2015 @ 1:09 am
Why does it matter? Money & the industry standard does not give music validity. Just enforces sheep mentality.
December 7, 2015 @ 6:23 am
It matters because mainstream country is the 800 pound gorilla in the room. You want to keep your eye on something like that–especially if you hate gorillas. . . But not Gorillaz–cuz I loves me some Clint Eastwood!
December 7, 2015 @ 11:12 am
Completely disagree. The point is the system should be fair for all parties.
In 2015, #1’s by Jason Isbell, Chris Stapleton, Aaron Watson, Blackberry Smoke, Willie and Merle, and other top-grade chart performances by folks like the Turnpike Troubadours completely changed the game in country music in 2015. Charts matter more than ever, and they matter more than ever for independent artists. It’s a way to even the playing field. We have to stop thinking of #1’s as only a discussion of Luke Bryan and Taylor Swift. It is a new day, and charts are they way we can prove that. But if manipulations continue to happen, that could change. More transparency means better chances for independent artists who cannot benefit from savvy marketing moves like mainstream ones. Chris Stapleton is the biggest artist in country right now, and Jason Isbell and Sturgill Simpson have outsold many mainstream artists.
We’ve got to end this loser mentality, and assuming the entire system is rigged against substance. This isn’t 2013 anymore. Substance is cresting the charts, and regularly.
December 7, 2015 @ 7:41 am
I don’t know I think I agree with Brett. What puts you on charts is teenagers. Aren’t they the biggest demographic, and who cares what they think, right. Obviously just because something goes to number one says nothing about substance or quality.
December 7, 2015 @ 11:05 am
Were teenagers the ones who put Chris Stapleton at #1?
It goes without saying that #1 doesn’t usually denote substance or quality, but perhaps by better regulating #1’s it can be a more fair measurement, and these two things could factor in more.
December 7, 2015 @ 3:22 pm
Chris Stapleton (overhyped) is a part of the same business that puts the anything else at the top. His hype will not last more than a year because he can’t back it up. He’s boring, and in music, boring is worse than bad. Industry can swing it which way they want at anytime. Charts don’t make you good. Best musicians and singers/writers are nowhere near the charts. It’s a kid, idiot game. Just like McDonald’s sells the most burgers, but we know they are not the best.
December 7, 2015 @ 5:38 pm
Whether Stapleton is boring or not is one’s opinion.
Adele’s music is frequently cited as boring among many, yet she’s as relevant as ever six years into her mainstream career. Many have considered Celine Dion boring yet she’s among the best-selling entertainers of all time and had impressive longevity in the mainstream.
If anything, if many consider Stapleton “boring”, then that bodes well for his mainstream career! 😉
December 7, 2015 @ 6:25 pm
Brett,
We have got to transition out of this losers mentality as music fans. We’ve become so hardened and jaded in our fights over the years, we’re untrusting of anything that’s successful, and we praise other things for being unsuccessful as a badge of honor.Just because something sucks commercially doesn’t mean it must be creatively better, or vice versa. It’s come to the point now where certain artists are making shitty records because that’s where they think the “soul” is. Most of mainstream music is absolute garbage, but if you look, statistically, independent music continues to gain market share. Jason Isbell’s album beat out Alan Jackson who’s one of the greatest selling artists in country of all time. Go ahead and shit on Stapleton as boring. Okay, what about Blackberry Smoke? What about the dozens of other independent artists that marked career highs in 2015?
It’s come to the point where we identify so much with losing, we don’t want to win, we don’t want things to get better, because it means the erosion of who we are, and what we’re supposed to stand for.
Slowly but surely, we’re taking the music back, and being able to point to charts and statistics is how we can prove that.
December 8, 2015 @ 8:22 am
Contrary, we as an audience have to quit letting publicists and major labels tell us what is supposed to be good. The loser mentality is looking at a chart and saying oh, that’s what I should be listening to. It ain’t losing to ignore those things and the masses. If you need a soap box that’s fine, but any real music revolution will not be televised”¦(or on the radio, or in print media). However, mainstream will attempt to steal it…
December 8, 2015 @ 9:20 am
I can’t speak for everyone, but I was a fan of Blackberry Smoke, Jason Isbell, the Turnpike Troubadours, and many others way before their names began to appear on charts, and was posting about them on this site. Sure, in the end it’s about the music, but the success of these artists proves why exposure and recognition matters. That doesn’t mean it’s the only thing, but it is important. And what’s so bad about the mainstream being influenced by better music?
December 8, 2015 @ 10:31 am
But was their success based on them being good? Why did their names begin to appear on the charts? Somebody manipulated something. You can’t complain about Kane Brown manipulation but then let it be ok for someone else to manipulate something just because it’s what you like.
December 8, 2015 @ 1:54 pm
The reason these worthy names began to appear on the charts is because indpendent fans are more likely to purchase cohesive albums as opposed to cherry picking singles like mainstream fans. This caused the paradigm to shift, and now all of a sudden you have independent artists competing, and sometimes dominating on the mainstream charts. And no, no manipulations are occurring with this. And we’re not just talking about Chris Stapleton or even Jason Isbell. Even artists like Jason Boland and Mike and the Moonpies are having banner years.
December 7, 2015 @ 9:18 pm
That’s an absolute falacy on boring. It’s subjective. What you didn’t describe as passion. What modern and processed mainstream music is missing. What chris has. Label it anything you want to. Maybe his singing style or lyrics or whatever he has doesn’t do it for you. You will not hear a person listen to his music with a full heart and think he doesn’t believe or live every part of it. His voice shows emotion. Why singing is subjective. Why some of the greatest artists ever were not the best singers. They lived and bled country music. Much more to it than that. That part of his music will never go away.
December 8, 2015 @ 8:27 am
Yes Charlie, that was a passionate ‘cover’ song Chris sang on TV the other week. With all his songwriting/singing accolades”¦? Chris: Hey guys were on the TV next week what song should be do, hmm, let’s go with a cover”¦WEAK. You know why he sang a cover, because his original stuff is boring! There is no passion in boring.
December 7, 2015 @ 6:01 pm
Spotify does this too, as they update their charts daily. They have the top 100 currently in the US, and I’m not sure if they have a similar chart for country, but this one shows that people are playing the hell out of the new Justin Bieber album (3 songs in the top 5), as well as Drake and The Weeknd and a few classic Christmas songs. Not just the radio hits either. Bieber doesn’t have a single song on his new album without 10 million streams or more. These charts seem more accurate to me in terms of what’s hot right now than the radio. They won’t play every Bieber song on the radio, but he can chart 14 songs in the top 85 on Spotify.
December 7, 2015 @ 6:06 pm
But the reason Bieber charts so well on Spotify is because his fans have absolutely no interest in buying music. So if you only grade music by the Spotify charts, you’re only looking at one cross section of the listening public. Same goes for radio, and same goes for iTunes, which tends to veer older and more educated. That’s why you need charts that take it all into account, like Billboard does. The problem is, if someone wants to know what’s hot today, at this very moment, they have to resort to proprietary charts. Meanwhile Billboard’s charts come out a week after people stopped caring.
December 10, 2015 @ 11:17 am
Hey Trigger, how come popular music does not appeal country music and country music only appeal people listen to country music tastes? Also, why country music like mainstream country struggles and only appeals country stations and North America? I’m curious. Why people streaming music hates country like Luke Bryan and only appeal mainstream like heavy metal. Is mainstream music like pop music popular music’s main appeal and not country? I don’t know. What you think, Trigger? Why popular music tastes like Vevo avoid country like Miranda Lambert?
December 10, 2015 @ 12:07 pm
Hey Peter,
I’m not exactly sure what you’re are asking or how to answer it. But I will say that today, country music IS pop music in the mainstream. It’s more pop music than pop music is. There’s plenty of terrible pop music too, but you’re more likely to hear a song of substance on a pop station today than you are a country station.
I hope this helps explain it.
December 20, 2015 @ 5:32 pm
Country music is NOT pop music. Country music is country music. Also, pop does NOT mean popular. It means that music that is catchy and repetitive. Mainstream country is still dwindling even with big names like Luke Bryan and popular music only appeals country music-less popular music like pop music. Pop and popular are different words. Please understand.
December 20, 2015 @ 6:15 pm
Country music IS popular music. However, country music is NOT mainstream music. Country music is a separate popular music. You see, mainstream music like pop music is ALWAYS popular music’s main priority because country music is made in Nashville designed for local music like country radio and CMT, not for popular music tastes in general like Music Choice and Vevo. That’s why country music did not perform well in the popular music industry like Spotify because country music only appeals regular music and North America and the biggest popular music will always remain mainstream music. That’s why mainstream music like Justin Bieber is MORE popular than country music like Florida Georgia Line. Country music only appeal Nashville and North America.
So there are 2 different kinds of popular music: mainstream and country. Mainstream music is a popular music where mainstream genres like rock and metal appeals for mainstream like MTV and Europe making regular music and country off of mainstream. Country music is where popular music is made in Nashville and made for country music department like country music awards, not popular music section like YouTube. That’s why country music will remain a placeholder popular music genre in the popular music department because popular music don’t seem to care for popular music and mainstream music will ALWAYS be the biggest popular music. Mainstream music is designed for worldwide while country is designed for North America. Not US, North America. Country music is NOT US music, country music are North American music.
Here’s how I divide 2 different popular musics:
Mainstream music: pop, hip-hop/rap, rnb/soul, rock, metal, dance/EDM, alternative, top 40, MTV, VH1, urban
Country music: mainstream country, traditional country, pop country, Nashville, country radio, CMT, GAC, country music awards
There you go, these are the 2 popular musics, Trigger. Therefore mainstream music is bigger than country music. I hope you like it.