Why The CMA’s Should Consider Adding “Traditional” Categories
It has become patently obvious, especially over the last few years, that country music exists in two completely different worlds. One is the traditional world, where the way country music sounds is in close proximity to the way it has always sounded. And the other is Top 40 or mainstream country, which in the last few years has become the home for a hodgepodge of musical influences that can range from stuff that sort of sounds like traditional country, to rock, EDM, pop, and hip-hop, and really any music made by predominately white American mainstream artists. In other words, mainstream country has become a catch-all term similar to how “rock” defined mainstream music for the better part of 50 years before.
The struggle of traditional vs. pop has been an eternal one in country music dating back to the very formation of the genre as a commercial enterprise, and it is likely that it will never go away. But never before have we seen the two realms of country music present themselves with such contrast. The cracks that form in country music’s otherwise unified front, which tend to form and heal themselves over time, have grown into downright chasms in the last few years that could now be considered unnavigable and unfixable. So what to do?
One of the ways to solve this problem could be to stop trying to put Humpty Dumpty back together again, and instead identify traditional country and contemporary country as the two separate entities they are, that ultimately share the same history, but have very different properties and objectives in the modern world.
This is already beginning to happen within the industry itself. It is at the heart of what many consider to be the impending format split on country radio, with Cumulus Media’s NASH Icon leading the charge by putting many older country music artists back on the mainstream airwaves. In fact the format split has been so successful for NASH Icon so far, it’s hard to see how two separate radio worlds for country music won’t soon be a reality. Meanwhile we can’t forget that the other half of the NASH Icon idea is for one of the genre’s biggest labels, Big Machine Records, to have an entire label roster of older country music artists that are still very much economically viable, but have been forgotten by the rest of the industry.
That’s the thing. Even though traditional country is seen as “old,” the simple fact is traditional country fans still make up what may be as much as half of country music fandom, and these consumers have been abandoned in the recent focus on youth in the mainstream. As we have seen with NASH Icon in Nashville, when consumers are presented with a country music option that includes older music, they apparently prefer it, or at least favor it just as much.
READ: NASH Icon is Now Beating Bobby Bones in Nashville
So now that radio and other segments of the industry have stepped up to fill the gap that opened when older, more traditional country artists were abandoned, the next step should be for the Country Music Association, or CMA, to step up as well and recognize that traditional country artists and consumers are being underserved, especially when it comes to events such as CMA’s music festival during the summer, and their annual awards show presentation in November.
Maybe it would be just one or two awards to start to see how it is received—a “Traditional Artist of the Year” or “Traditional Album of the Year.” This would simply be a way to acknowledge the two realities that exist in country music in the 2010’s, and would also give traditional fans and artists something to look forward to in the presentation and a reason to tune in. If it is successful, maybe you expand it from one traditionally-distinguished award to two or three. Maybe include “Traditional Song of the Year.” And if the idea is really well-received, maybe expand it even to “Best Male” and “Best Female” in traditional categories. The presentations for these traditional awards don’t all have to be televised; again maybe just one or two of them. But similar to the idea behind the country radio split, it would be a way to re-engage the fans mainstream country has left behind recently. And as we’ve seen with radio, re-incorporating more traditional country fans isn’t robbing Peter to pay Paul, it is engaging more people overall with country music media and growing the pie.
The CMA is charged with representing and promoting all types of country music, not just the hot young artists at a given moment. And if the idea works, maybe the ACM Awards would follow suit, and the CMT Awards and new Country Countdown Awards as well.
And this may not just be beneficial for traditional country artists and the industry by creating a more widely-appealing product. Current contemporary artists may also benefit. Remember at both the CMA and ACM Awards this last round, George Strait won Entertainer of the Year when Luke Bryan’s camp for example believed Luke was the more worthy recipient. It’s debatable if Luke’s people had a legitimate beef, but if you have another award category, this gives artists who are excelling a greater chance of being recognized. It also gives a host of traditional nominees the extra exposure even if they don’t win.
And these traditional country categories shouldn’t just be considered a shoe-in for traditional country artists. Let’s say a contemporary artist decides to make a throwback, more traditionally-oriented album like Dierks Bentley did with Up On The Ridge in 2010, or Kellie Pickler did with 100 Proof in 2012. Then they could hypothetically qualify for these traditional distinctions, just as a traditional country artists could still qualify for contemporary female or male vocalist awards, or Entertainer of the Year if they do enough to deserve it during the eligibility period. By having traditional awards, it may even entice mainstream artists to make more traditional-sounding records, just like the presence of “Duo of the Year” and “Group of the Year” categories has spurned its own industry of acts that try to take advantage of these televised distinctions annually. And this isn’t simply about age. Younger artists playing traditional-sounding music like Ashley Monroe or Sturgill Simpson should also be considered.
The CCMA Awards—Canada’s rough equivalent to the CMA Awards—already does something similar to this idea with their “Roots Artist of the Year” distinction. Both males and females can be nominated for the more traditional award (Corb Lund and Lindi Ortega won it over the last couple of years), and it gives that extra exposure that can really boost their career. The Grammy Awards also offer some distinctions between classic and contemporary music in certain categories.
There could be some potential drawbacks however for traditional country artists and music. Depending how any new awards are approached, the traditional categories could feel like a second place, or inferior distinction unless they were handled properly. However, just like we have seen with NASH Icon, these awards could draw just as much, if not more interest from the public as their mainstream counterparts. You would also not want to discourage traditional artists from being nominated for the contemporary awards if they deserve it, like George Strait’s recent Entertainer of the Year wins. You also have to consider the Devil’s Advocate position that by making a traditional award or awards, you could be seceding the fight that some of the stuff that they call country music deserves distinction when it really shouldn’t be called country at all. To some traditional fans, the ideal world would be to take back the awards from pop/rock/rap/R&B interlopers and make them more about traditional country across the board.
Nonetheless, it is time to recognize the new realities emerging in mainstream country music. And if the genre wants to grow, it has to figure out ways to re-engage the traditional fans radio and the industry has disenfranchised recently, especially in the last half decade. It would be prudent to start small with just one or two awards and then twist and tweak with the awards and the eligibility rules after you gauge how the idea is received.
It is time for the CMA and the entire mainstream country music industry to recognize the huge gap between traditional and contemporary country music, and the potential revenue traditional country music fans pose for the industry. These are fans who still buy full albums, who still listen to terrestrial radio, who show tremendous loyalty to their favorite artists, and beyond the philosophical differences that keep them from engaging with today’s country, traditional country fans simply represent an economic block that the country music industry needs to re-engage with to deal with the economic realities besetting the business.
October 13, 2014 @ 8:40 am
I think it should be the other way around. Traditional country music was first. Add a category called “Pop/Rap country music.
October 13, 2014 @ 8:41 am
or “Pretty Boy” country music!
October 13, 2014 @ 1:23 pm
Jason Aldeen and the 2 clowns in FGL ain’t pretty though.
October 13, 2014 @ 7:15 pm
‘I think it should be the other way around. Traditional country music was first. Add a category called “Pop/Rap country music.’
I could not agree more vehemently with Shannon’s suggestions. Country music IS traditional country music . The crap currently being peddled as country music should be heaped into ONE award category if it needs even THAT kind of recognition .
It could be called ‘BEST-EST KIDDIE-KOUNTRY AKT’ with a funny little play on the spelling and a statuette awarded of a backward-hatted , sun-glassed, droopy-jeaned , wallet-on-a-chain “cowboy ” playing a LesPaul with a broken string .
OK …sorry about that last suggestion . A little much I guess . Make it a fully-stringed Les Paul .
October 13, 2014 @ 8:45 am
I’ve been pushing traditional since 2007.
October 13, 2014 @ 8:56 am
Country music exists in two different worlds, as you say in the first line.
Well, there are award shows for both. On the one hand you have the CMA’s, and on the other you have the AMA’s. One celebrates pop-, glitter- and bro-country. The other celebrates country music.
The trick is to get people who fall into the NASH Icon audience to notice all the fantastic music that is made and honored in the AMA realm.
October 13, 2014 @ 9:31 am
The simple reality is that for every fan that pays attention to the Americana Music Awards, there are 2,500-5,000 fans that pay attention to the CMA’s. Putting the two beside each other, for all intents and purposes, the Americana Awards might as well not even exist. I love the Americana Music Awards and they are doing a great job promoting independent artists. But the simple fact is the mainstream country music industry controls the message of what country music is perceived to be by the American public, and if we are ever going to make a dent in that these institutions have to be engaged directly.
Also, the AMA’s do a great job giving credit to independent artists who slip through the cracks. But what about artists like Alan Jackson, Ashley Monroe, Kellie Pickler, and many others that are too mainstream to be distinguished by the AMA, and too traditional to be considered by the CMA’s? Hypothetically, a new traditional category or categories could go far to giving them the distinctions they deserve.
October 14, 2014 @ 7:24 pm
Interesting, or why doesn’t the AMA’s include some more mainstream artists to bring in a wider audience? I mean, that seems to be the point of why you cover so many pop country artists on your site isn’t it? Draw people here for a story on FGL in the hopes that they might read a review of a lesser known indie artist?
October 14, 2014 @ 8:00 pm
Yeah, I’m not sure that model would translate to the AMA’s. In the Texas scene there’s a little more mixing of stuff. At the Lone Star Music Awards you’ll have Robert Earl Keen, Kacey Musgraves, Jason Isbell, and Sturgill Simpson all up for awards, but I think the spirit of the AMA’s is to catch artists as they fall from the mainstream, like Johnny Cash or Lee Ann Womack.
October 13, 2014 @ 9:11 am
The only thing that separates “mainstream” “hit radio” country from rock or pop these days is the singer singing with a twang. That’s the identifier. You could easily take a lot of “country” songs and have them be sung by say….Adam Levine, maybe change a few references to things less small town/rural, and you’d have a hit pop song.
That said, I’ve yet to see a country song played on a mainstream pop radio station. I wonder when that is going to happen. Right now my daughter and her friends in the Chicago area listen to US 99 one minute, B96 the next. Suburban kids.
October 13, 2014 @ 11:53 am
Get them an HD radio and they can listen to US 99 HD2. No DJ’s, no commercials (maybe 1 minute every 30 minutes), plenty of women artists, and the Top 100 instead of the Top 20 over and over and over…
October 13, 2014 @ 9:34 am
To play devil’s advocate…The CMA’s, to me are nothing but a popularity contest. Who’s to say that they add a Traditional category and someone such as Florida Georgia Line or Luke Bryan release a traditional style album. They have contributed nearly nothing to true country music. But they may want to just get another award for their collections. What would keep these artists out of the Traditional category? Artists such as Sturgill Simpson, Whitey Morgan, or Chris Knight would still not be recieving their due recognition if they have to compete against a Keith Urban.
October 13, 2014 @ 10:58 am
Of course the CMA’s are nothing but a popularity contest. But they also reach millions of people, and represent what country music is on a grand scale. So we can either concede the entire mindset about what country music is to the CMA, or we can try to craft pragmatic solutions on how help the organization better represent what country music truly is.
There’s never going to be a scenario where Luke Bryan and Florida Georgia Line completely disappear from country music, and Whitey Morgan and Chris Knight are winning the top CMA Awards, no matter how much anyone hopes for it. And that’s certainly not going to happen overnight. So instead, let’s figure out ways to slowly bring the balance back where more traditional and substantive artists are at least represented, and then go from there.
And if it entices Florida Georgia Line to make a traditional country record, then hey, that means country music overall is going in a more traditional country direction, and overall this would be a good thing. But 1) That’s never going to happen. 2) It’s not likely Whitey Morgan or Chris Knight would be nominated in a traditional country category anyway. Sturgill Simpson maybe. This is still the mainstream industry.
October 13, 2014 @ 12:12 pm
I completely agree that this would be a very positive step in the direction of country music. To clarify, I agree that Knight or Morgan would ever be a top winner over FGL or the like. I was just saying that in a Traditional category, current mainstream artist have no business to be allowed to compete. From a popularity stand point, music quality aside, it would be totally unfair.
October 13, 2014 @ 1:33 pm
That is why I think that if the CMA decided to go in this direction, they should start small to make sure they control how the new categories develop. If they just become ways to highlight the same artists the other categories do, it would be a big fail. As we’ve seen when new categories are added in the past, or when rules change such as when Billboard changed their chart rules a couple of years ago, the industry responds by specifically catering music to fit these new rules. If this happened in accordance to the new categories, I’m not sure it would be an entirely bad thing. And if it entices some mainstream artists to make traditional country records, then that’s a good thing. But any award or nominations should still go to the most qualified, or worthy candidates.
October 13, 2014 @ 11:09 am
I agree with Trigger; my dislike for contemporary mainstream pop-country artists isn’t personal, if someone like Luke Bryan were to release a legitimate traditional country album I’d give it a listen without prejudice. Well, maybe with a little prejudice, but I wouldn’t write it off without listening to it just because I hate most of his other songs.
There would have to be some pretty well-defined ground rules, though, to prevent a song like “Cruise” from becoming eligible for a traditional award just by adding some fiddles and steel guitar.
October 13, 2014 @ 10:37 am
For the Australian Country Music Awards they have a category for Alternative Country Album of the year as well as Heritage Song of the year and Bush Ballad of the year.
October 13, 2014 @ 11:00 am
That the thing. When you look at a lot of music industry awards, they make this key traditional vs. contemporary distinction. Country music is one of the last genres not to adopt this, and is also one of the last radio formats to split. This is all long overdue, and if they do it, it will be mutually beneficial to everyone.
October 13, 2014 @ 4:02 pm
speaking of Australia..what did you guys think of the new C.W. Stoneking?
October 13, 2014 @ 11:53 am
Thank God I have 98.1 here in Albuquerque. It’s all classic country. I don’t watch the CMAs, just because there’s nothing other than tailgates and girls, and even worse, girls in the crowd that dress slutty.
October 13, 2014 @ 1:00 pm
I discovered real country music about 10 years ago, when I was in my early twenties. So, as a still youngish country fan, I am wholly in favor of traditional country distinguishing itself.
But, better still, the mainstream should finally move beyond this horrid nightmare! I am not too hopeful with all the adoring, lustful female fans flocking around Luke, Chase, FGL, and all the other vapid so-called artists, but maybe these fans will move-on once their fickle lusts turn elsewhere. Please, ladies, go find a real man and stop this adolescent grappling.
October 13, 2014 @ 9:55 pm
Males, not females, are the primary fan base for bro-country.
October 14, 2014 @ 6:38 am
That would hardly explain why the fans in the audiences are predominately female. It’s the irony of mainstream country today: the female artists are the most creative and rightly indignant at their gender’s near-total absence on the radio, while the bro-country movement has been driven heavily by its female audience. This is only anecdotal, but go to YouTube and read the positive comments for any Luke Bryan, Chase Rice, Jason Aldean, or FGL video.
October 15, 2014 @ 11:37 am
Check out the third comment on this page, written by Windmills Country, our resident expert in music statistics:
https://savingcountrymusic.com/sirius-xms-fresh-female-voices-looks-to-return-girl-power-to-radio
October 15, 2014 @ 1:55 pm
Thanks, Eric, for the link. I am willing to retract my claim. But I am still curious as to why it appears that female fans are driving the bro-country phenomenon — maybe they are the most enthusiastic, willing to buy front row seats, comment positively on YouTube, and so forth. I trust that my impression is not alone.
October 13, 2014 @ 2:17 pm
I honestly feel like the time for commercial country is coming to an end. Country music has always kind of operated in cycles where it goes overty pop and gets mainstream popularity, and then goes back to its roots. Obviously the popularity of the current mainstream country is unprecedented (and not country), but I just have a feeling that its going to turn stale rather quickly and people are going to run from it, but not neccesarily to other (better) country acts. In other words; I think Country is going to become decisively “not cool” again and that’s just fine with me.
October 14, 2014 @ 6:02 am
What about Bluegrass?
October 14, 2014 @ 8:16 am
I think bluegrass should definitely be considered within these traditional categories right beside country offerings. If there is a standout bluegrass album or artist in a given year, this would be the perfect outlet to highlight it in, whether it is something like Dierks’ “Up on The Ridge,” Alan Jackson’s “The Bluegrass Album,” The O’ Brother soundtrack (a perfect example of a traditional album that should have been considered for CMA acclaim), or something from one of the more traditional bluegrass acts. I’m not sure a dedicated bluegrass category would work, because I have a feeling it would immediately become an “also ran” category. But who knows. If more traditional music can take hold in the awards, maybe in the future this could be a possibility. Again, the CMA is charged with promoting ALL country music, including bluegrass.
October 14, 2014 @ 6:21 pm
My only issue with this idea is I don’t see the industry coming to a consensus on what “traditional” means. Some may contend that the Strait/Jackson sound was the end of the traditional sound. Others consider the 90’s sound of artists like Tim McGraw and Brooks & Dunn as traditional. Moreover, I know there is a significant portion of mainstream fans who consider artists like Justin Moore traditional (which obviously many in this community would disagree with.) What about artists and sounds that blur the line? Miranda Lambert? Easton Corbin? Brad Paisley? In my mind, there is just too much grey area to make everyone happy.
October 16, 2014 @ 11:15 pm
Very interesting. Please Keep me informed.
Best regards from Switzerland
October 17, 2014 @ 12:29 am
Trigger, I think this is an excellent suggestion. I would go further and suggest that the CMA eliminate gender specific award categories such as “Best Male Vocalist” and “Best Female Vocalist”, and replace them with stylistic categories such as “Best Traditional Vocalist”, “Best Bluegrass Album”, etc. There are far more important things about music artists than their gender. Yes, bro country is bad for the country genre, but it would be just as bad if the same music were released by female artists. The CMA should allow males and females to compete for the same awards, and encourage artistic creativity and stylistic diversity.
October 28, 2014 @ 12:28 pm
This was a very good article written by Trigger and most informative. Even all the comments had valid points. A true country artist has to be very strong in their beliefs when pressure is put on them by agents/managers/labels to go for the bigger bucks that are promised (but not always achieved) if they cross over.
For me some of the blame must go in the way the music is now recorded and produced, using the same ‘pro tools’ systems as pop records, we just get a mass produced sound and you can’t tell one song from another and even more importantly can’t remember it when it stops, the ‘new country’ may as well be all one long boring song. Some say Garth Brooks changed country music, not for the better, though he sold 200 million albums, he just made it heavy.