Album Review – Lavender Country’s “Blackberry Rose”
If you were writing a detailed history on country music, compiling a timeline of significant moments in the genre, or a list of firsts experienced over the years, you would be remiss if you did not at least give mention to Patrick Haggerty and his band Lavender Country. Despite Jason Isbell and The Highwomen claiming to have written the first gay country song in 2019, Haggerty and Lavender Country beat them out by nearly half a century.
Based in Seattle, Lavender Country released the first gay-themed country album in history with their 1973 self-titled release. It wasn’t country music’s first gay album just because Patrick Haggerty happens to be gay. The songs were specifically about the gay lifestyle, and from a gay perspective. From Washington State originally and raised on a dairy farm, Haggerty was kicked out of the Peace Corps in 1966 for being homosexual. The Lavender Country album was funded by the Gay Community Social Services of Seattle.
Regardless of how one feels about the actual music of Lavender Country, it was quite revolutionary at the time. In the early 70’s, you were running a big risk just being out of the closet, let alone broadcasting that fact through playing in a gay country band. Beyond the ridicule, you could be assaulted or receive death threats. Not to be cute, but what Patrick Haggerty did took balls, and it has secured his name as an important figure in country history.
Lavender Country wasn’t just about the music. It was about the radical activist attitude, and the pushing of boundaries and buttons the band symbolized. As a band, it never was much of a going concern as it was a novelty. Patrick Haggery was a professed socialist, and it was basically a side project to express his activism, performing at Pride rallies and political functions. The original lineup of Lavender Country disbanded in 1976.
Now Patrick Haggery and Lavender Country are back with their first record in 50 years called Blackberry Rose, and it’s being released at a time when much of the media is obsessed with identity in country music, and when the “queer country” movement is taking root, despite being named after a long-standing euphemism that five years ago would have you banned on social media if you used the term towards someone else.
And dutifully, the media has stepped up to support Lavender Country’s efforts with vociferous acclaim. It’s received more press than most any other country album in 2022, and reading the reviews and coverage, you will conclude Blackberry Rose is one of the best country albums that will be released all year.
But there’s just no way to soft peddle it. As an album, Blackberry Rose is awful. It’s incredibly amateurish, poorly performed, even more poorly engineered and produced, with hackneyed and rudimentary instrumentation that often can’t even stay on time with the crudely-constructed songs. Similar to Long Violent History by Tyler Childers, Blackberry Rose is just very novice, gliding past criticism via favorable name recognition, but without the benefit of at least a fundamentally sound effort.
And the thing is, everybody knows it, including those praising the album to the hilt. Because that’s what you do in 2022. You take stock of an artist’s inherent grievance vectors, and you deliver your conclusions based on that. That’s how you sow social capital, and gain traction on Twitter. Otherwise, you might be accused of bigotry. In fact, the more you lie about your feelings on an album like Blackberry Rose, the more clout you accrue. It shows your loyalty to the cause.
The truth is Patrick Haggerty is a musician in a similar way that Jesco White is, which is not really at all. He’s a cult figure, a cultural icon, who as covered before, deserves all the credit in the world for his pioneering and brave moves in the early 70’s. And frankly, it’s a bit embarrassing to have to point out the shortcomings here, because Haggerty does deserve a level of priae.
But there’s a pervading idea out there perpetrated by the media that anyone from a marginalized class who didn’t make it to superstar status in country music must have been the victim of discrimination, despite the fact that 99 out of 100 white straight males don’t make it either. But Patrick Haggerty never had the opportunity to be a big star in country, and it had nothing to do with being gay, or the content of his songs.
In fact, if you really cared about the legacy of Patrick Haggery, Lavender Country, and gay country in general, you would be incensed by how this record turned out. Haggerty deserved better, and this is one of the many reasons to speak honestly about Blackberry Rose. With all the support for gay country artists these days, and the legendary status Haggerty holds in that realm, the community should have come together and made him an album he could have been proud of, and that could have enjoyed some resonance.
Instead, even the people who say they’re listening to this album and love it, they’re not. They’re lying. All you have to do is look at the streaming numbers, and be shocked by the lack of reception for a record that has received as much press and praise as it has. Pitchfork graded it a 7.7. For context, they graded Sturgill Simpson’s Grammy nominated last record The Ballad of Dood and Juanita a 7.4. If it wasn’t for the way the current media landscape salivates over efforts solely off of identity, a review like this would never need to be written here. With the amount of undue praise it’s receiving, it’s imperative to at least attempt to set the record straight.
Yes, part of the charm of the original Lavender Country album from 1973 was it’s homespun, “come on let’s go, count it off!” attitude. It wasn’t some masterpiece either. Beyond Haggerty, Lavender Country has always been a collective of fellow activist local musicians. And again, Lavander Country was not necessarily even about the music from the beginning, but about the defiance of the effort. But you could tell that even by 1973 standards, there was an effort to take Haggerty’s songs and do right by them with that first record. Blackberry Rose isn’t ready for open mic night at the local pub. It’s shockingly bad from such an important figure.
There are some amazing country musicians out there at the moment that also happen to be gay, not that whomever someone chooses to sleep with should be a curation point for who anyone chooses to listen to. Just in the last year we’ve received quality records from Melissa Carper, Bobby Dove, Brandi Carlile, Sarah Shook, and many others. Trixie Mattel surprised us all with her more folk-inspired country songs. Though Orville Peck’s debut album was not nearly as country as some wanted to sell it as, his new stuff sounds much more promising. There’s also some great country artists that proceeded Haggerty such as K.D. Lang, Kristen Hall, and Jimbeau Hinson, who never seem to receive enough credit.
And let’s face it, in 2022, few if anyone cares about someone’s sexual orientation when it comes to whose music they decide to listen to, except for the people who obsess over identity. That ship has sailed aside from a very small minority of forgotten souls. And the sooner we stop harping on the “who” as opposed to the “what,” the sooner real progress will be made, and we reach the ideal of equality.
But in this case, the “what” is just not even listenable, regardless of who it is.
1 3/4 Guns Down (1.5/10)
Wobblyhorse
March 16, 2022 @ 9:47 am
There are so many queer country artists that are actually good, so I don’t understand why this is notable
Harpo
March 16, 2022 @ 9:56 am
Well said,Trigger.
Jerry
March 16, 2022 @ 10:23 am
Thank you for writing this.
Eric
March 16, 2022 @ 10:25 am
Jason Isbell willing felating himself is not ‘writing the first gay country song,’ “Feed Jake” is another famous song, from the 90’s that is loosely a gay song.
Trigger
March 16, 2022 @ 10:34 am
Willie Nelson released “Cowboys Are Frequently, Secretly Fond of Each Other” in 2005 around the release of “Brokeback Mountain” that made national news. It was written by Ned Sublette, who released his own version in 1981. I don’t blame anyone for not knowing about Lavender Country, or even Ned Sublette, since they are pretty obscure artists. But it takes a real leap of faith to declare writing the first gay country song in 2019. Don’t mean to pick on Isbell, but the historian in me wants to make sure we get this stuff straight.
Eric
March 16, 2022 @ 10:39 am
I still think Florida George Line and Walker Hayes are gayer than two men having anal s*x and enjoying it.
Eric
March 16, 2022 @ 11:36 am
Social Justice activism doesn’t care about true historical facts. The 70’s had a strong underground taboo counterculture where “taking it as far as you could” was seen as an artform, regardless of the actual artistic merit of the artist
King Honky Of Crackershire
March 16, 2022 @ 10:59 am
Eric,
My understanding of “Feed Jake” was always that it was criticizing the judgement of someone based on appearance. The song basically says, “you shouldn’t assume someone is homosexual just because they get their ear pierced.”.
Eric
March 16, 2022 @ 1:06 pm
@King Honky That’s probably true, and I meant it partially tongue in cheek. It was ballsy at that time to even give room for the assumption. Either way I consider it one of the great “not perfectly written” songs of the 90’s.
Kevin Wortman
March 18, 2022 @ 3:59 pm
Only if they get their right ear pierced. The left side is cool
King Honky Of Crackershire
March 16, 2022 @ 10:51 am
Trig,
Did you review this to show you’re “down”? Or did you review it just to prove you’re willing to criticize music performed by a communist homosexual?
If it’s really as bad as you say, it immediately makes me curious about your motivation for posting this. I get posting negative reviews for mainstream Country acts. Those reviews serve a purpose. I don’t see a purpose for this review, other than to make a statement. But I’m not sure what the statement is.
I’m not attacking you; I’m just curious.
Wilson Pick It
March 16, 2022 @ 11:19 am
What is your motivation for posting this comment? What is MY motivation for posting THIS comment? Let it go. It’s an album review, I don’t think there’s much more to it than that.
Trigger
March 16, 2022 @ 11:49 am
Honky, you’re always trying to assign underlying political motivations to all of my actions, despite my insistence that I have no underlying political motivations aside from removing political motivations from the realm of musical criticism, which was the motivation for posting this review.
Luckyoldsun
March 16, 2022 @ 2:55 pm
The guy’s a Trig groupie.
King Honky Of Crackershire
March 16, 2022 @ 4:34 pm
Naw, Trig, I’m not trying to assign political motivations necessarily; just trying to understand the motivations in general. I assume a political motivation first, because that seems the most obvious to me. And based on what you said, your motivation is political, just not in either of the ways I suggested.
You’re saying, “I’m going to write about an album with political ramifications, even though it sucks, so that I can prove I’m not political.”.
Again, I’m only asking because it seems like an odd album to write about, if it’s as bad as you say. As I’ve told you before, I believe you to be one of the most misguided doofuses in journalism, but a gifted writer nonetheless. So if you feel writing negative reviews for albums from homosexual communists is a good way to prove you aren’t political, then go for it. I just like to understand the whys.
Trigger
March 16, 2022 @ 5:11 pm
I stated very specifically why I chose to write this review in the review itself.
“If it wasn’t for the way the current media landscape salivates over efforts solely off of identity, a review like this would never need to be written here. With the amount of undue praise it’s receiving, it’s imperative to at least attempt to set the record straight.”
King Honky Of Crackershire
March 16, 2022 @ 7:01 pm
Trig,
I skimmed through, so I missed that part. I’m following you now.
SkiBum
March 17, 2022 @ 9:43 am
Why do you follow this website if you think Trigger is “one of the most misguided doofuses in journalism”? There are a lot of those out there. I don’t waste time following any of them.
Doug Carter
March 18, 2022 @ 9:28 am
He does it so he can have an audience for his agenda. Why start your own website to push your politics when you can take advantage of existing sites? It isn’t easy to build a following. By infiltrating non-political websites’ comment sections with his politics, he is doing, in his mind, “The Lord’s work”. He is a prosletyzer, plain and simple. Otherwise, there would be no point in his political posts. Even if I agreed with the views, I would ban such commenters, especially after several warnings, but it isn’t my site. C’est la vie.
CountryKnight
March 18, 2022 @ 10:14 am
Of course, people like you call for censorship and bannings.
Doug Carter
March 18, 2022 @ 10:40 am
This is not political, simply educational. Even if I owned SCM, I am not a government, so I could not censor anyone. A private business should be able to run their business as they choose, as long as it abides with constitutional law, including deciding the parameters for commenting in their website’s comment section. That’s free enterprise, of which I am a proponent.
Luckyoldsun
March 18, 2022 @ 11:03 am
@dc–You’re 100% right from a legal and ethical standpoint.
Still, it seems that Trig/KC has made the decision to keep the comment section relatively free-wheeling, with very moderate moderation on his part. (The Trig groupie complains constantly, even about that.)
Given that KC has, somewhat improbably, made a success of this site (and given also the inordinate number of hours a week that he has to devote to it), I refrain from critiquing him on matters pertaining to operation of the site.
King Honky Of Crackershire
March 18, 2022 @ 4:19 pm
Hi SkiBum,
Trigger is a very gifted writer, and I enjoy reading his articles, even though the overwhelming majority of his opinions are misguided. Also, this is a website that reports on C(c)ountry Music, and I enjoy the nostalgia it brings me.
Despite what my groupies, Douglas and Luckoldsun, stated, I seldom, if ever, bring up politics on this site, until someone else does it first. But yes, once the gate is opened, I enjoy participating in political discussions.
You know what’s really funny? I never speak to Douglas or Luckyoldsun, unless they speak to me first, and even then, I sometimes don’t. Those dudes are obsessed with policing my behavior. Have a good day.
Paul Jesselle
September 14, 2023 @ 4:15 pm
If he had “underlying political motivations” would he not have given the album a positive review?
EmmonsDay
March 16, 2022 @ 11:03 am
Bro. What’s bad about it? Having listened, I have some answers to that question. But I didn’t get any reading your piece. Not a single one. Just more of your lifestyle /media reception ruminations, another shot or two at your boy isbell, and a list of some gay singers.
Also, to remove the wool from your eyes- yes, people obviously deeply care about a singers sexual orientation, particularly in pop country. It’s the most heteronormative reductive conservative junk we’ve ever been treated to as a genre. It clings so deeply to some version of ‘normalcy’ it’s almost a gay parody of itself.
Final friendly reminder- in your album review, tell us something, anything about why you don’t like this new album.
Eric
March 16, 2022 @ 11:37 am
Funny that someone with two of the greatest pedal steel players ever in his Handle can’t answer that question for himself.
EmmonsDay
March 16, 2022 @ 12:22 pm
Huh? Am I an album reviewer? Do I post album reviews on the internet? Am I saving country music? What’s your point boss? What’s funny for you here?
Trigger
March 16, 2022 @ 11:54 am
“It’s incredibly amateurish, poorly performed, even more poorly engineered and produced, with hackneyed and rudimentary instrumentation that often can’t even stay on time with the crudely-constructed songs. Similar to Long Violent History by Tyler Childers, Blackberry Rose is just very novice, gliding past criticism via favorable name recognition, but without the benefit of at least a fundamentally sound effort.”
I could have gone deeper with my specific criticism of the music song by song or something, but I just didn’t see that as in any way helpful or enlightening. To be frank, this music is so bad, what’s wrong with it is self-evident. But seeing how you have universal acclaim behind this record, expanding the discussion to how the album sits in the greater narrative on country music—which is something I do in almost all of my reviews—I thought was more valuable to share.
Di Harris
March 16, 2022 @ 12:56 pm
“It’s the most heteronormative reductive conservative junk …”
‘Splain.
EmmonsDay
March 17, 2022 @ 7:44 am
Sure. Take a look at the big sellers, the up and comers, and their B grade knock-off versions, particularly before the last few years (when the industry has made a concerted effort to promote something other than straight whites singing the same songs). It’s hats jeans trucks and girls and bad food and back roads and party anthems and church and momma and daddy and t. Swift’s feelings and Jesus and rich guys’ cowboy john Wayne fantasies, based on the previous hit about some of the above. Musically, it’s jingoistic hair metal with different tones made by the same handful of producers/musicians, with a ballad or two, and a little vocal twang. The cover will feature one of less than a dozen image themes, usually a singer’s face. There are exceptions, but this is the rule.
Zach M
March 17, 2022 @ 8:13 pm
When the posted video started playing, I checked my background because I thought another video was playing behind it. The music doesn’t overlap at all. The audio balance was awful too. His voice sounds so distant (for lack of better explanation) from the music
EmmonsDay
March 17, 2022 @ 9:05 pm
Yeah man. It’s brutal. Vocals one whole state away. I’d love it live at a rural fair, because they’re not so far off, it’s funny and clever and weird as hell, and I could always walk away. Put it up against click track super compressed modern country with predictable lyrics and big dick hot licks Brent Mason b-team guitar solos, and it’s another planet all together.
Jeff Stevenson
March 16, 2022 @ 11:46 am
Lol, we found the Haggerty fan.
Di Harris
March 16, 2022 @ 11:56 am
Jim Nabors had one of the most beautiful voices of the last several decades.
DJ
March 16, 2022 @ 11:59 am
The future’s not what it used to be….
Great write up Trigger… good to see an honest journalist actually getting attention.
RyanPD
March 16, 2022 @ 12:11 pm
Would their first album in ’73 at least be considered a better album than this one?
Trigger
March 16, 2022 @ 12:34 pm
I would consider it better, but I would also not consider it good. But as some will tell you, that’s not the point. The point is what this music symbolizes, not the music itself. The problem is when you grade the music on such a demonstrable curve that you act like it’s great, that deception creates downstream dilemmas. When Patrick Haggerty put out his first record in 1973, the community came together to try and make the best album they could for him. This time, it almost feels like they’re trying to exploit the moment, and didn’t even care how the music was rendered. He isn’t even the primary performer on some of the tracks. It’s such a shockingly poor effort. I hate playing the mean critic believe it or not, but this whole thing just feels like a grift, from the production, to the release, to the complicit media coverage.
Jake Cutter
March 16, 2022 @ 9:12 pm
Is the grift working? Like Mickey, apparently the media activism isn’t enough to make people listen. What will they get out of it? Now….imagine this…..…it would be funny as shit if like a year from now it was revealed that this was all an experiment to see how bad they could make something that the media would still rally behind.
CountryKnight
March 16, 2022 @ 12:24 pm
The content of music and writing have never really mattered to most critics as much as the beliefs held by the musicians and writers.
Modern reviewers have taken it up to eleven.
This album is terrible. But I will listen to The Wooks to save my ears. “Union Pacific” is real music with a real story to tell.
Steve Murphy
March 16, 2022 @ 12:34 pm
The album is terrible, and while I have respect for Patrick Haggerty, he isn’t a great singer (something he will freely admit) and the production of the album was horrible.
Back in my early-teen years me and a few of my friends used to prank call Mr. Haggerty all the time, and make fun of him and his music. Obviously that was a very immature thing to do, I can’t help but chuckle when I think of it.
AdamAmericana
March 16, 2022 @ 2:30 pm
This is some Candice Owens/Ben Shapiro type BS up in here. The Anti-Woke Beast Speaketh!
Earl McLachlan
March 16, 2022 @ 2:50 pm
Or, here me out, it’s also possible that the album sucks.
terry
March 16, 2022 @ 2:46 pm
Unfortunately this review is very true! I saw a lot of other reviews that made me listen but I thought it was unlistenable. Why would they rave about such a bad album? Surely it sets their cause back? I listen to lots of gay artists like the ones you said Bobby Dove and Orville Peck and Sarah Shook and I’d add Cameron Hawthorn and Philipa Cookman and Tommy Atkins. Why not promote music which is actually good?
CountryKnight
March 16, 2022 @ 2:54 pm
Because it is not about promoting music. It is about promoting an agenda.
Jake Cutter
March 16, 2022 @ 4:28 pm
The fawning of the press over this is just awesome. They couldn’t delegitimize themselves any faster if they tried. They’re giving the Babylon Bee a run for their money with their recent news of Zelensky asking the US to send over FGL.
Di Harris
March 16, 2022 @ 4:37 pm
“They’re giving the Babylon Bee a run for their money with their recent news of Zelensky asking the US to send over FGL.”
Jake,
Are you kidding?
What asshole(s) are making fun of Zelenskyy?
RD
March 16, 2022 @ 6:20 pm
Me
Di Harris
March 16, 2022 @ 6:53 pm
RD,
You’re making fun of Zelenskyy?
Want to make sure i have this straight.
Trigger
March 16, 2022 @ 7:07 pm
This article has absolutely nothing to do with Ukraine, or Zelensky. The Babylon Bee article was SATIRE. For the love of all things holy, STOP veering these comments into stuff completely off topic, and even more contentious than the topic at hand.
Di Harris
March 16, 2022 @ 7:11 pm
@Trigger,
*sigh*
RD
March 16, 2022 @ 7:13 pm
I’m making fun of his martyrdom. I view him sort of like I view that tranny swimmer at Penn. For all I know, he’s filming his parts at a soundstage in LA.
AdamAmericana
March 17, 2022 @ 7:05 am
RD is a troll. A conspiracy theory troll.
Lefty
March 16, 2022 @ 6:26 pm
the babylon bee is a satire news website. the article didnt make fun of Zelensky, but damn they sure dragged FGL hard. hilarious article actually, i dont think theres too many people hating on ukraine outside of some alt-right qanon nutjobs
https://babylonbee.com/news/in-massive-escalation-zelenskyy-requests-america-send-florida-georgia-line-to-play-concert-for-russian-soldiers
RD
March 16, 2022 @ 6:29 pm
Yeah. And some people who understand American foreign policy of the last 30 years. Oh yeah, and those people who find neo-Nazis objectionable.
CountryKnight
August 12, 2022 @ 5:42 pm
RD,
Amazing how months later, people are finally starting to wake up how Zelenskyy just wants money for his globalist agenda.
Maybe people will finally realize that America’s foreign policy is nothing but fighting wars to make our leaders money.
King Honky Of Crackershire
March 16, 2022 @ 8:13 pm
Trig,
Why am I being prevented from participating in this conversation?
Trigger
March 16, 2022 @ 8:33 pm
Honky,
This is not difficult to understand. This is a country music website. Each article is based around a topic. The discussion needs to center around that topic, or around music. Sometimes people want to chat about other things. Cool. But when it comes to divisive political subjects, it commonly gets out-of-hand. And so I request people please do not veer into that subject matter.
Sometimes people do anyway, accidentally, naturally, whatever. I try to not be an overbearing moderator, so I try and let the discussion breathe. But when someone comes in, like you did with your comment—and you do all the time—and dramatically escalates the divisive nature of the conversation—especially in a way that could very specifically bring criticism down on me—you give me no choice. Feeling singled out? Well maybe it’s because you’re the guy that’s constantly doing this.
And by the way, the only thing I hate more than off-topic comments about divisive political subjects are comments about comments, and more comments about comments. Are we going to do this on every fucking article? I don’t live you moderate your comments, Honky. Figure it out.
Jake Cutter
March 16, 2022 @ 7:53 pm
It’s making fun of FGL, and I’m making fun of the media.
RD
March 16, 2022 @ 4:30 pm
Rod Hart’s “CB Savage “ came out in 75 or 76. It’s older and gayer than anything mentioned here.
Kevin Wortman
March 16, 2022 @ 4:32 pm
Wheeler Walker not only has gay songs…he praises pedophilia, incest, you name it…all the “cool” stuff
RD
March 16, 2022 @ 4:45 pm
Yeah, then he incites violence against innocent minors. When he gets taken to task, he deactivates his social media and disappears for years. He is one of the worst humans drawing breath on this planet. Little Ben Hoffman, fuck him with post hole digger.
RyanPD
March 17, 2022 @ 5:21 am
If you take one Wheeler song seriously, then you have to take them all seriously, which defeats the purpose of actually listening to him.
Kevin Wortman
March 17, 2022 @ 9:43 am
It’s all just music. I wouldn’t take any of it seriously
Eric
March 16, 2022 @ 5:27 pm
His slimy opportunistic comeback deserves a story. He waited just long enough so the rednecks who coagulate in Walmart parking would run to his stupid, expletive-laden juvenile music
Paul Kagourtine
March 16, 2022 @ 7:27 pm
Not a Patrick Haggerty fan, I presume.
Lefty
March 16, 2022 @ 6:29 pm
Any plans for a review on ernest’s new flower shops album? havent really checked it out yet but i dont have high hopes, but the title track was pretty solid.
Trigger
March 16, 2022 @ 7:17 pm
Might have an Ernest review very soon.
hoptowntiger94
March 16, 2022 @ 7:34 pm
I thought there was some unearthed Ernest Tubb box set entitled “Flower Shops” you were referencing and it sent me searching the internet to find ANOTHER single named country artists. There’s only one Ernest.
Lefty
March 17, 2022 @ 6:26 am
look, i dont like the guy either and im a big ET fan, but anyone making traditionally sounding music in the mainstream has my interest
wayne
March 16, 2022 @ 7:35 pm
I simply don’t know what to make of all this.
robbushblog
March 17, 2022 @ 10:52 am
That song sounds terrible. Ugh.
Ian
March 17, 2022 @ 12:44 pm
I’m sure this album is as terrible as you say, but I take the whole rating of albums with a grain of salt, for example you gave the Staind “country” album an 8.5 despite the fact that was not country or good, only better than the rest of Staind-“country” I guess glass houses come to mind. Either way I will not be listening to this.