Facebook Becoming the Big Box of the Internet
Remember back in mid September when Facebook made a myriad of changes and everyone was complaining and threatening to leave, many for Google’s new rival social network Google+? Well apparently people were more bark than bite. Though Google+ did receive a spike of interest from Facebook’s format change, which virtually coincided with Google+’s Sep. 20th public beta launch, the trend was very short lived, with Google+’s usage going back to the same levels they were at before the Facebook changes within a few days.
Meanwhile many of the services that had people worried about privacy issues, ones that if you used your friends could see the activity, had huge spikes in subscribers. Spotify gained over a million users, and MOG grew by over 246% after the redesign. But one major Facebook tweak that went by without drawing much interest or ire was the de-emphasis of links in the news stream that lead to websites outside of Facebook’s format, and an extra emphasis on personal pictures and embedded video that keep you in the Facebook fold.
In other words, instead of seeing a link to an in-depth album review or interview from Saving Country Music, you see the picture of a cat vomiting with an ironic statement below it. Instead of seeing a link to a website petitioning for social change, you see a picture of a hardline political statement that leads to nowhere but a friend’s Facebook picture gallery. Facebook’s policy change on links has cut traffic to this website from Facebook three fold.
Facebook has made it clear that they want to become the only place you go on the internet, with all other sites running through Facebook’s format, i.e. CNN for news, Spotify for music. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg has said many times he doesn’t care about making users happy, he cares about what improves the number of Facebook users, and the amount of time they spend on the site.
As a small independent website owner, this has me just as concerned as a small, independent business owner would be if a big box store like Wal-Mart was moving into his town. As evidenced over and over in America, the intrusion of big box stores into communities means the downfall of many small, independent businesses, and the sense of community they create, and the local flavor they contain; a trend that has become an indelible theme of modern American life. Facebook, or any large website that is able to assert ultra-dominance over what you see and how you behave online could spell doom to the microservice, specialization, and just simple charm that independent websites above the hobby level are able to offer.
Of course, ironically, one of the ways a small, independent website can make itself known and create a following is through social networking, and many sites have been successful doing so. However with Facebook’s downgrade on outside links, and dominance of the social network landscape, this dynamic could change dramatically, and also stunt future websites who were not able to get the word out before the current and future changes to how links are handled.
Meanwhile every day there seems to be a new concern over privacy and intrusion with the Facebook format. The State Data Protection Agency in Germany is suing Facebook over their facial recognition feature. Another lawsuit points out that Facebook tracks users through cookies even when they’re logged off. Earlier this week concerns came up that Facebook stores your data, even after you delete it, possibly making them the largest holder of personal data on individuals the world has ever seen. And then just in the last few days, the widespread porn spam that pervaded Facebook raised new concerns that with so many Facebook users, it has created a computer mono-culture that with one hack could infect the entire country.
Nobody wants to shop at Wal-Mart, just like nobody wants to use Facebook. Unfortunately, left with no alternative, people still use it. And as big of the promise of Google+ was, and the fact that since Google is the advertiser, they have no reason to sell your data to another party, it simply hasn’t taken off, and the format still contains many of the same challenges and concerns that Facebook does when it comes to data sharing and privacy.
I would hope that the lessons we’ve learned from the physical world about how letting a few large national entities dominate our buying and eating habits robs us of community and individuality could be translated to the online world. In many communities, the big box phenomenon is in its latter stages, and urban renewal is happening as people decide to reinvest in community instead of giving their money to foreign entities. Hopefully with the internet, we will never get where renewal is needed, but it will only happen if individuals understand that every click is like a vote cast and a dollar spent, and small, independent websites are one way we can keep the individuality and charm of the internet in a global format.
November 17, 2011 @ 8:56 am
Hey, Trig:
I’m not sure I understand all this. I use Facebook regularly, and I think I’m seeing everything you post there. In fact, I got here today from clicking on a Facebook post with your link in it.
Is Facebook blocking your posts? Is there any way for you to tell if they are blocking your posts?
While I know how to use various Internet sites, I’m not educated enough on the underlying processes to know when they have been changed, and how those changes affect a site’s functions. I only know what I can see, and when certain functions no longer perform as they used to.
Keep up the good fight!
John
November 17, 2011 @ 9:35 am
Facebook is not “blocking” my posts, and if you saw this link, great! There are still people seeing links, just not as many.
If you go to my Facebook wall, then you will see all of my posts in real time, with the last one I posted first, etc. However since many people have so many Facebook friends and going to each individual’s Wall is too time consuming, Facebook relies on a “news stream”. The news stream aggregates information from all of your friends into one place. To do this, it can’t show you everything, so it must prioritize the information. How exactly it prioritizes that information is a complex formula, but it has to do with whose Facebook profile you visit most often, who visits your Facebook profile, what things you click on the most, etc. etc. It can also matter on your gender, geographic region, ads you click on while on the site, all kinds of stuff.
If you commonly click on my links, you might see them more often, but the point is with Facebook’s redesign in late September, they took links that lead to outside of Facebook, and made them less likely to come up in people’s news streams. Facebook used to account for about 20% of the traffic coming to this website. Now it is about 6%.
April 9, 2012 @ 1:38 pm
i added you to my family thing and i get notice every time you post… any person or band you want to keep up with should be added to your family group then you don’t miss nothin’… i quit stoppin by as often because of all the trolls and haters that were ruining the post…
November 17, 2011 @ 9:06 am
Great article. I’ve said it for years that the social networking sites have ruined the web industry for mom and pop design shops like me. With people able to have myspace and facebook type “sites”, people now think they don’t need web sites and that they are themselves web masters……. uurggh
November 17, 2011 @ 9:27 am
I recommend to any and all bands to have a presence on all social media platforms, including Facebook. But if you use these sites as your ONLY online presence, you are doing yourself and your music a disservice.
Think of it like an aircraft carrier with fighters. The aircraft carrier is your base, your mothership, your primary website, with the fighters your social network properties, flying out to collect fans and connect with other entities. Social networks put a barrier between a band’s information and search engines like Google. They also leave a band open to the whims of that social network, and the whims of the pliable social network consumer. Look what happened to MySpace, and many of the bands that relied on their format. Facebook never really offered an alternative, and Google+ isn’t either.
I talked much more in-depth about all of this here:
https://savingcountrymusic.com/a-post-facebook-music-guide-for-bands-artists-and-fans
November 17, 2011 @ 9:15 am
I too share your concerns about Facebook. I’ve had several small blogs over the past 5 years or so and for a bit Facebook increased my number of hits. That’s changed over the past couple of months. I originally used the service to re-connect with old friends and to keep current with family. It was new, it was novel. Now…not so much.
The big box analogy is right on the mark. I managed an indie record store on Long Island for years. The good times ended when Best Buy moved in and the labels eliminated MAP (minimum average price). Yes the consumer benefited from lower prices but they have seen options and selections decrease over the past decade. The local mom and pop store is gone and now Best Buy has cut music to a small percentage of the store. It was always about selling TV…never about the music!
The paradigm shift away from physical music sucks but the labels, big box stores and the major acts got what they deserved. It’ll be a shame if Facebook kills off the indie bloggers and websites which are the best thing that has happened to music in years.
I love your site (although I don’t always agree) and this is one great example of what is happening out there for music fans. Too bad it will get harder and harder to find.
November 17, 2011 @ 9:16 am
I hate Wal-Mart but it is the only place here to shop. Literally. We have Safeway and I go there but otherwise Wal-Mart is what we have. I am on Facebook because I choose to be. I do not put any identifying info except my age and my name. I have no phone number, address, mother’s maiden name or anything else on there. I honestly don’t understand the hate some people have for Facebook. To me it is a tool to stay in touch with my friends and family and to (yes, I admit) play games. When you have been laid off for 5 months those damn Facebook games are the only thing keeping you sane. I am not a savvy computer user. I can navigate a little but when I have problems I frantically call my next door neighbor. So Facebook is getting too big for its britches? Ok. I don’t really care. It provides a service I need and since I still see your links you post I’m really not understanding. Although I should tell you that yours are the only outside links I ever click on so maybe that’s why I’m not noticing. Or I could just be oblivious. That is extremely possble too.
November 17, 2011 @ 10:25 am
Facebook is excellent for staying connected with friends and family and for wasting time with silly little games, and there’s nothing wrong with that, that is what Facebook is for. When they start branching out to other areas, like music distribution and news dissemination, to the point where you have no other reason to go to any other site is where it could become a problem.
It is just like the story of how Wal-Mart started. It started as a fairly useful, small but all-encompassing department store that brought products to under-served communities that were not big enough to support shopping malls, etc. When they started dramatically expanding their selections, and branching out to things like garden supplies and groceries and oil changes is when their impact really started to be felt by those communities.
As far as personal information on there like maiden name and phone number, that stuff is all irrelevant at this point. Anyone can find that info on anyone without Facebook with a few clicks. I don’t want to be alarmist, because I do think many folks get too worked up over this, but the concern with Facebook is much more detailed information, like when your children are sick, when you ate lunch at Dairy Queen, and with who, and a picture you added to your profile as proof. Or let’s say you said something in a status update, and then quickly deleted it because it was damaging in some way. All that is stored by Facebook, and as part of their user policy, is now their property to do with whatever they wish.
Again, for most of of, this is not a concern, and shouldn’t be a reason for paranoia. But as Zuck says himself, the era of privacy is over.
November 17, 2011 @ 11:44 am
I have always just put the websites I like to frequent (like this one) in my favorites. Even when I see one of your posts, I don’t click the link. I go to the site from favs. I have a long list of favorites but it works for me.
November 17, 2011 @ 9:47 am
Triggerman,
There are alternatives to Facebook besides Google+, which in my opinion, was not much better than Facebook. I could share links and such as to why I feel this way. On the secure, control all of your information, etc. side of social networking is Diaspora. However, I believe Anybeat would be more interesting to most Facebook users. The community is encouraged to make new acquaintances through the forums and such.
Thanks,
Johnny
November 17, 2011 @ 11:20 am
Yeah, but how many people use them? That’s the problem. Of course they’re better. Just like good music, the better it is, the less widespread appeal it usually has. Maybe one of them will rise up. Here’s to hoping.
November 17, 2011 @ 1:33 pm
That’s a very valid point. I believe people are searching too much for the “Facebook killer.” My thoughts are that Facebook will be the death of itself much in the same way Myspace essentially killed itself (though Myspace is certainly attempting a comeback.) Perhaps it will be the ‘hipsters’ that ring the death toll: when they started making smartphones with a Facebook specific button, I assume it was a matter of time before Facebook was no longer cool. These are just assumptions and guesses.
I’m very happy to see you covering these sorts of issues, Trigger. They’re very important to security, privacy, freedom and the Internet as a whole.
November 17, 2011 @ 1:54 pm
And to music. I think we are still struggling in the music world to the post-MySpace reality, and I think Facebook’s dominance has kept us from finding something equal or better than what MySpace meant to bands, artists, and fans years ago.
November 17, 2011 @ 2:17 pm
That’s very true. While there are websites that are great (Bandcamp comes to mind), none offer the strong community that Myspace did. It’s either you depend on the current social networking websites (Tumblr, Facebook, etc.) which do not really cater to bands/musicians or strike out on your own with a personal website (which may work for more established artists but not new/indie ones due to price). Sorry to reinforce your point, Trigger. Haha.
I haven’t thought much on social networking websites that could really provide for artists, but I’m sure a model wouldn’t be hard to develop. Now, if one wanted to execute the model, that’s a totally different ballgame. Hopefully there are entrepreneurs out there waiting for the decline of Facebook in order to strike.
April 9, 2012 @ 11:15 am
Yeah, the argument for Google + over Facebook is like arguing for Target over Walmart. Same shit, different cooler more hip “bullseye” packaging…
November 17, 2011 @ 10:10 am
The first thing I noticed about the new Facebook was that it does your web surfing for you. It began telling all your friends what you liked, watched, read, commented… every move.It posted you mobile phone #. It even deleted posts from pages without consent or control from the page admins. (Personally, I thought it was interesting that it happened at the same time as Occupy Wall Street began, but I’ll take that elsewhere) The moment people started predicting that facebook would go the way of MySpace, i speculated that the next social media phenom wouldn’t be a site, it would be more like a “cyber-self”. Effectively, the entire web will be a social network connected to your physical world through your mobile device. If you go to Wal Mart, your facebook self will be there as well. (11:09am near Cordova, Tennessee)
Not only does Wal-Mart have a virtual monopoly on products in many areas of the country, it actually changes the streets, stop lights, turns lanes, and such so that it becomes central to the area. Facebook has inserted itself into search engines and blog sites in similar fashion.
What I’ve done is organize my “favorites bar” on my homepage with SCM and some indie on-line radio stations. That way I can click directly rather than thru facebook. It helps to support sites where I know people are WORKING rather than clicking on whatever catches my eye.
November 17, 2011 @ 10:27 am
I like facespace, although in the beginning it was a reluctant move because I liked myspace. I have grown to see the advantages and disadvantages of all the social networking, albeit it’s not the networking’s fault anymore than it’s the users fault. You lead a horse to water then get upset about how the horse drinks it? The horse is thirsty and that’s all there is to it or they wouldn’t drink it. The danger in facebook or anyother network is not the network itself, but the weaknesses (or even strength’s of the users that abuse, and distort and pervert it. Porn has been around for how long? If you are perverted to it then that’s on you. If you are out to harm people, then that’s on you. If you are out to rob, steal, lie, etx etx, then that’s on you. If people take personal responsiblilty then I respect that. It’s not a secret that I believe in God. Read the Bible and you might see that all is coming true, all is happening whether atheists and agnostics like it or not, and the demoralization of America is sure one big hint that God told us so. If facebook is hindering you and your efforts then I don’t know what to say. Look at what is going on in government, in people’s homes, on the streets, in the schools, in the chatrooms so on and so forth. It really shouldn’t come as a surprise. Put trust in God and you’ll be ok.
November 17, 2011 @ 11:07 am
A little off topic but still relevant.
http://m.npr.org/news/front/142420978
November 17, 2011 @ 11:22 am
I keep hoping for Google to rise up and bust the monopolies like Facebook or Apple, but they always seem to be too incremental. So you can buy music on your Android phone and share it with your computer. That’s cool, but more of an eventuality than a game changer in the industry in my opinion.
November 17, 2011 @ 3:10 pm
I didn’t like seeing how people can buy music through Google, and turn around and share it with others. This just goes back to the question of whether music should be free or not. I would think this aspect would keep independent artists from using their site, considering Google is targeting them.
November 17, 2011 @ 5:16 pm
Good point.
April 9, 2012 @ 11:16 am
Excellent point.
November 17, 2011 @ 2:43 pm
face book is a good place to talk to people, I like you tube better… face book gives out way too much of people’s info any way… i try to stay limited what i do on face book. I will only talk to my friends on facebook is if that is the only thing they use.
November 17, 2011 @ 9:06 pm
I love Facebook because it puts me in front of everyone I would never be able to find on my own. I can easily network with people with the same interests as me just as in myspace. But I will say they have become greedy with their control of information. If you take away my ability to successful communication then you are no good to me. So I will use them for now but when someone comes along with more access to communication I will jump ship.
This whole crap of having to subscribe to people to see their posts is bullshit. I friend them to see what they say or to have them see what i say. Now I have to go back and subscribe to them? It’s crap and it’s only one of the things they have done that irritate.
greedy gatekeepers.
November 18, 2011 @ 7:12 am
Trig – you and your readers need to read this. I’m in technology and do not use Facebook under any circumstances for many reasons. This is one of them.
http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-tracking-2011-11
It’s important to know what (and who) you are dealing with on the Internet.
April 9, 2012 @ 11:22 am
We’re all being tracked every moment, every place. Dive into some of the SOPA and NDAA governmental access points and you will see that if you log on anywhere, you are being tracked. I’m involved in some radical revolutionary activism stuff and you can bet your ass that “they” have a shit ton of data on all of the times I hit “Crimethink” or some other subversive website. The thing is, “they” could justify taking just about any action “they” wanted to against anyone. I don’t surf animal porn or anything that I would be embarrassed for folks to know I look at, so in my view, we are all constantly being watched regardless of whether you click on FB or any other site, and you might as well just use whatever you want to connect to anyone you want to. There’s no escaping “the powers that be” having access to your data.
April 9, 2012 @ 11:30 am
I did install that disconnect add on you posted. Doesn’t hurt to try! 🙂
November 18, 2011 @ 7:15 am
This is a really good post. I’m really torn when it comes to Facebook. You point out its obvious disadvantages, but on the other hand, I’ve found more independent music on Facebook than I ever did before, which I always pay for by the way 😉
November 18, 2011 @ 7:16 am
P.S. Google is no better. When you subscribe to a ‘free’ service, you are not a customer; you are the product being sold.
November 18, 2011 @ 7:20 am
I recommend disconnect me – http://disconnect.me/
November 18, 2011 @ 8:45 am
Thank you for the link, LostInNYC. I only use Facebook to keep up with family I otherwise wouldn’t hear from often and that amount bothers me. I suppose I enjoy being a product for Mr. Zuckerberg to sell. All spiffy, all pretty.
Seriously, thank you for this add-on.
November 18, 2011 @ 10:17 am
GREAT ad-on! Thank you so much! I also like Ad Blocker http://adblockplus.org/en/
November 18, 2011 @ 8:48 am
I’m a reluctant user of FB. I joined because so many friends and acquaintances were using it. I also realized that a lot of the local bands that I follow use it as a way to advertise their shows and keep fans up to date. Myspace used to be the way to keep up with all that, but now it’s about extinct.
I use the mobile version almost exclusively. So just by opening up FB on the phone I get the latest updates of the local bars, bands, musicians and plan my nights out accordingly, if going to see local music.
It’s a means to an end. A tool that I use the way I want to keep up with the things I want.
I hate FB, yet need it at the same time. Until someone comes up with a Target or Kohl’s version to compete with the Walmart version, I’ll have to keep using FB.
November 19, 2011 @ 6:49 am
LostInNYC got it, in my opinion–the insidious thing about facebook is how it tracks you when you’re not even on the site. The cookies. It sends a chill up my back when I visit a website and see a little fb widget or banner or whatever with my name on it, asking me if I want to “like” the site. I think “how the F did you know I was here!?”
I don’t want any bot or human or website following my every move! With the right algorhythms and something like the MMPI test, you could probably figure out someone’s entire personality, history and life just by tacking them!
November 21, 2011 @ 9:33 pm
Here is an article that explains exactly what I am talking about from a more technical standpoint. This stuff is shocking. Facebook is truly making a power play to take over the internet.
http://dashes.com/anil/2011/11/facebook-is-gaslighting-the-web.html
“what Facebook is calling “frictionless” sharing is actually placing an extremely high barrier to the sharing of links to sites on the web. Ordinary hyperlinks to the rest of the web are stuck in the lower reaches of a user’s news feed, competing for bottom position on a news feed whose prioritization algorithm is completely opaque. Meanwhile, sites that foolishly and shortsightedly trust all of their content to live within Facebook’s walls are privileged, at the cost of no longer controlling their presence on the web.”
November 26, 2011 @ 7:13 am
hey, triggerman, it’s been a while. happy thanksgiving. i was using Facebook regularly for a year or so. i bailed out about a month ago. the ‘new Facebook’ being the main reason. though i still have my account there. maybe one day they’ll ‘get it’ and i can go back. yeah. like that’s gonna happen. Facebook has always been insidious since it’s inception. cookies and spying being the primary things most folks there just don’t understand. your writing as always is top notch. at any rate, i’m bookmarking this site on my new rig.
November 26, 2011 @ 7:20 am
Good to hear from you John!
April 9, 2012 @ 4:32 pm
Well, apparently it is working out ok for some folks…Facebook sucking or not. This is a pretty well researched study…
http://www.npr.org/blogs/therecord/2012/04/09/150287405/how-to-succeed-in-the-music-industry-by-trying-really-really-hard