‘San Antonio Current’ Beclowns Itself with Charley Crockett Data Center Story

If you need any more validation that some weird social contagion around attempting to take down Charley Crockett has taken hold among a certain population, look no further than this irresponsible, and arguably defaming and libelous new article from San Antonio Current.
Apropos to really nothing except trying to mine clicks and extend the whole fiasco with the Satanic Twin Temple band, they decided to take the 27th sentence from a 30-sentence missive from Charley Crockett, and turn it in to a dedicated article to push the canard that he’s pro data center construction of all things. Oh, and for good measure, they also tried to inject drama into the entirety of country music by acting like data centers were an emerging wedge issue, instead of one that’s drawing nearly universal condemnation.
In an article written by Stephanie Koithan published on Monday, August 3rd titled, “South Texas Country Artist Charley Crockett Disses Celebs Who Stand Against Data Centers,” she asserts, “Alt-country artist Charley Crockett can’t seem to keep his mouth shut. First, he sparked controversy by dropping Satanic doo-wop duo Twin Temple as opener from a series of his shows. Now, he’s going after celebrities who rail against data centers — including some of the biggest names in country music.”

What is the source of this dedicated article by what otherwise is considered a well-respected South Texas publication? It was one sentence from a week old social media post from Crockett. For illustrative purposes, you can see the sentence in question bolded in Crockett’s full post below.
“2 riders were approaching, the wind began to howl”. The last line from what might be the greatest song ever written. A plate I’ve been eating off of since I was 17. I became a disciple of Bob Dylan whether he wanted me or not. I loved Woody Guthrie as a young boy and so I was destined to fall for Bob. I too piled all the burden of a savior on a man I never met because I felt so close to his songs. You might say I worshipped him. Then one day, for reasons I won’t elaborate on here, I hated him. I felt he had betrayed me. He refused to fly my flag. The Outlaw brand in the music business was a marketing gimmick created by new blood record executives in Nashville to repackage Waylon & Willie. I came to identify, not with the brand of these 2 men, but with the road they walked down, as my own road caused me to recognize their struggle to find a place in an unforgiving high stakes system. There’s no reason to imitate these men sonically, without understanding their trials and tribulations. That is, if you intend to lay siege to the citadel. Kris Kristofferson once said something that hit me like a train: “I know a lot of times I’ve read that Mickey Newbury and I changed things here. We didn’t do it. It was them. It was Johnny Cash and Bob Dylan who changed Nashville from just being a country hick place to something important you oughta examine.” Turns out I’ve come to the same conclusion. Maybe it ain’t a coincidence that me and Kristofferson were born one town apart in Deep South Texas. You see Cash and Dylan had all the power in the world an artist could hope to amass at that time in America. They were label mates at Columbia New York and were so popular they could hardly be controlled, though every effort was made to wrangle them boys in. They didn’t have to push the boundaries. It would have been more profitable if they played it safe. Leaders like JFK and MLK were being gunned down in the streets. It’s difficult for me to take a celebrity serious railing against data centers when they’re posting enough selfie videos to house one themselves. Oh and about Dylan, he’s my favorite again. Where do you think I got the idea for Quantro & Cholla?
Talk about an opportunistic pull quote. And even though Crockett said nothing about other country artists, and was clearly talking about social media influencer types, the article goes on to try and twist Crockett’s words to calling out his fellow country artists.
Stephanie Koithan goes on to say, “In an interesting coincidence of timing, Willie Nelson spoke out against data centers the next day — including one being developed in his hometown … It’s unclear which celebrities in particular Crockett was referring to with this jab about data centers. However, as of the date that he posted it, Brad Paisley had already come out against a data center threatening the Nashville Zoo in a selfie video. (Hmm). Since then, Tanya Tucker has also joined the chorus about the danger the big computing centers pose to rural Texas.”
The quite telling “Hmm” is especially damming, while the clickbait article concludes, “Is a rift forming in the country music scene over data centers?”
Charley Crockett responded on Tuesday (8-4),
Wow. So now a newspaper in San Antonio is presenting me as pro data center. What a riot. Funny how they didn’t mention I called out the tech billionaires behind them for buying our elections just a few months ago. I’ve been speaking up against AI since way before it was popular to do so, I just wasn’t really on the map. This is conformity. Public shaming because you think god, or your anti-god is on your side. When I said I’m not on the left or the right, I’m on the road, I’m telling you that we see it all out here. Most people can barely pay their rent. Folks are drowning in depression and these phones have a lot to do with it. I think for myself. Conformity is picking a side and sticking with it even when the flag waivers are dead wrong or show themselves to be selfish and corrupt. Step out of line and they’ll ruin you. You know what would be brave when you stand up against data centers with your platform? Admitting your own participation in it. We’re all addicted to social media. Completely dependent on smart phones. We’re addicted to the instant gratification. That includes me. I got myself off the street by learning how to use one of these things in late 2014. It was a Samsung Android (ha) and I paid my Metro PCS bill every month in cash. Every single thing you do on a phone is backed by data centers. All of it. Root Causes America. Root causes. It’s really starting to look like 1984 out here. I’m against data centers. I don’t like AI. Throw away your phone in America and you don’t exist. I’ve done it. I’ll do it again. Rage against data centers. Keep them as far away from our communities as possible, but wherever they end up they destroy the environment and I wonder if you’ll be satisfied as long as they’re in a poor, brown 3rd world country like everything else we send overseas or across the borderline. This shit reminds me of Vietnam. We didn’t lose that war. Hell I’m wearing a shirt writing this made in Southeast Asia. The only thing we lost was the moral high ground. How many have died in the Middle East since 9/11? Lemme tell you. Millions. Here’s one for you bronco. Vietnam never ended, we just got used to it. Put that in your pipe jack.
As has been said many times with Charley Crockett, he’s not above criticism. Even in his initial, meandering rant where the data center quote was taken from, he says, “The Outlaw brand in the music business was a marketing gimmick created by new blood record executives in Nashville to repackage Waylon & Willie.”
That’s not exactly true. It was Hazel Smith who came up with the term. She worked for Tompall Glaser at the Hillbilly Central renegade recording studio, and is considered the “Mother of Outlaw Music.” Yes, the term was an element of marketing, but not by “new blood record executives.”
Charley Crockett needs a filter, and a full-time publicist. And go ahead and criticize him for being a “cosplay cowboy” all you want. But this San Antonio Current article might be the most egregious mischaracterization of a country artist by a publication currently in print. Did they reach out to Charley Crockett to clarify his position on data centers before publishing the story?
This situation definitely rivals the story published by TMZ about how Morgan Wallen poured a full beer down a woman’s blouse in Nashville in 2023 when no such thing happened, even by TMZ’s own video.
TMZ eventually pulled the libelous article. That’s exactly what San Antonio Current should do too, and apologize for trying to muckracke in the country music community about something all the artists named and involved actually agree with.
It’s become fashion in certain circles to slag Charley Crockett. But articles like the one in San Antonio Current undermine the credibility of all media outlets when they come to such clearly unfounded conclusions.
– – – – – – – –
If you found this article valuable, consider leaving Saving Country Music A TIP.

August 5, 2026 @ 11:25 am
“It’s a slow news day and I need a country music story by noon. The Jelly Roll divorce is played out, nobody’s gone into rehab this week and Morgan Wallen hasn’t hit anybody lately. I guess I’ll go over to IG to see what Charley’s ranting about today.”
August 5, 2026 @ 12:49 pm
It’s wild that Stephanie Koithan is supposedly an award-winning journalist and this is the kind of reach she publishes. Taking cheap shots and twisting Charley’s words just for clicks. Where has real journalism gone?
August 5, 2026 @ 3:08 pm
The New York Times has never returned Walter Duranty’s Pulitzer.
August 5, 2026 @ 2:34 pm
I do like how he says I’m neither left or right before unloading some pretty heavy left wing positions. Happy to have him even if he doesn’t realize it
August 5, 2026 @ 4:31 pm
I would mark Crockett as a “populist” more than on the spectrum of right or left. The populist movement has politically strange bedfellows often. Steve Bannon has ranted on his show before about AI and the tech-elite having so much influence in the Trump White House. Tucker Carlson has Benn Jordan on his show a few weeks ago to talk about the dangers of FLOCK cameras and mass surveillance.
Crockett seems to be more in the vein of populist than anything approaching a liberal or conservative.
August 6, 2026 @ 10:37 am
Alexander I see your point and it’s a fair one, but I’d agree with Mike here. People can reject the political establishment but still hold views associated with one side or the other. You could look at Charley’s comment on conformity in his post here as an example.
August 14, 2026 @ 10:55 am
Self-telling jokes are just like self-rising biscuits and to that end look no further than Charley Crockett. Here’s a guy who can’t even win for being exactly what he appears to be..
August 5, 2026 @ 12:13 pm
I saw Silverada Monday night and was surprised they threw a little shade at Charley as well — he is really making enemies everywhere it seems
August 5, 2026 @ 1:59 pm
What did they say about him?
August 5, 2026 @ 2:52 pm
As early as March they were changing “Davy Crockett” to “Charley Crockett” in the song “Eagle Rare.” I’m not sure if it’s meant as a dig at Charley, or if this is what Cwcs is referring to.
August 5, 2026 @ 7:25 pm
Yes — maybe it wasn’t meant as a direct dig but not a flattering comment
August 6, 2026 @ 5:43 am
I expect to see your condemnation of Silverada in one of your next comments/articles considering they’re out here calling for the cancellation of the poor and defenseless Charley Crockett.
August 6, 2026 @ 8:52 am
Yeah, I think one of now half a dozen articles published by outlets condemning this “San Antonio Current” story is probably not the right place to broach a discussion about how the attacks on Charley Crockett haven’t been an overreach. I heard Silverada change the lyric at SXSW, certainly took note of it, but am not going to muckracke and say it’s a dig when I don’t know that for sure.
August 5, 2026 @ 3:47 pm
It’s more like he’s shedding fake friends. Did you listen to One Eyed Jack?
August 5, 2026 @ 12:18 pm
As I’ve said before:
Charley Crockett is the Jesse Welles of Sturgill Simpsons.
August 5, 2026 @ 12:42 pm
Be that as it may, what are your thoughts on the San Antonio Current story? Regardless of your dislike of Charley Crockett, do you think it was fair and responsible journalism?
August 5, 2026 @ 1:05 pm
Opinion pieces aren’t journalism and a Charley Crockett brain fart isn’t news.
August 5, 2026 @ 1:33 pm
Was it a fair and responsible opinion piece?
August 5, 2026 @ 1:52 pm
No.
August 5, 2026 @ 12:38 pm
It’s strange how desperate people are to find a reason to throw dirt at Charley. Taking a single sentence entirely out of context just to manufacture outrage is ridiculous. Let the man speak! Haters get ta steppin’!
August 5, 2026 @ 1:34 pm
I checked out your instagram, and saw the three black and white pictures. I think I have seen that type of picture before, and I find them interesting due in part to the eyes I think. I think the ones I am thinking about were zoomed in even more.
I am wondering whether it would be interesting taking these type of close up pictures of faces and then asking the person a question just before taking the picture (or series of pictures), but giving them the instruction to not actually give the answer. For instance, a question could be “What is the most beautiful thing you have ever seen?”.
I wonder whether there might be a moment where the photographer can “see” in the eyes of the person that they are thinking about what the answer is for them. The photographer can then pick the photo they think might “capture” the exact moment the person is thinking about the answer. Or, maybe the person can have some sort of button in their hands which they can press as soon as they come up with the answer in their mind.
I wonder whether that could be an interesting approach for making photos. If that would produce some interesting photos, it could even be made into a collection or book of sorts. One could simply title the book with the collection of photos using the exact question asked when taking the photo. It seems possible to come up with some interesting questions, perhaps relatable to many, that could be used in this manner.
Anyway, here’s a section of some lyrics I wrote:
I think there was a moment when I looked into your eyes
Where it seemed I was observing something beyond the skies
And once in a while I remember and think about it
Perhaps because I don’t understand, or know of words that fit
It seemed as if it got more quiet, and time moved slower
It was as if I was drunk, and getting more and more sober
Up to a moment where it seemed silent, and time stood still
And I could see and sense what I may never again will
August 5, 2026 @ 2:37 pm
Stalker!
August 5, 2026 @ 11:16 pm
Now don’t you hoot ‘n holler
I only checked it out ’cause of the color
You see, the name is shown in orange and it has a hyperlink
I assume it’s there to be checked out, or a least that’s what I think
August 6, 2026 @ 11:46 am
Don’t listen to the trolls Alexander. You are in no way a stalker.
August 5, 2026 @ 3:56 pm
Thank you so much, Alexander! What a thoughtful response and creative concept.
Your idea actually reminds me a lot of a technique Richard Avedon used! When he photographed the Duke and Duchess of Windsor on April 16, 1957, he knew they had practiced, rigid expressions for the camera. To break past those fake smiles, he told them a story about a taxi hitting a dog right before snapping the shutter—capturing their true, unguarded emotion.
These three portraits are deeply personal to me—my dad is on the left and my grandpa is on the right, both shot by me on 4×5 film (heavily inspired by Avedon’s In The American West). The center photo is of me, taken by Joseph Wyman during a solar eclipse at Stagecoach music festival a few years ago.
I really love your idea about capturing that quiet, internal moment in someone’s eyes, and thank you for sharing your lyrics! Much love!
August 5, 2026 @ 11:57 pm
I checked out some pictures on the website of Wyman and I think I like black and white pictures more than pictures in color for some reason. Perhaps that’s why I noticed the portraits on your instagram page as well. Maybe it’s less distracting for me when a picture is in black and white.
I think the photos you took of your dad and grandpa are beautiful (or whatever word is more appropriate or better to use here). They capture that something that I was thinking about when writing my comment and mentioned the type of black and white pictures I have seen before and thought were very beautiful and interesting. As a result of your comment I now wonder whether these photos I have previously seen, and was thinking about, were pictures taken by Avedon.
I think there might be some sort of similarity or overlap in songs and pictures for me. I think they both capture or describe something that can be experienced or taken in (or whatever word is more appropriate to use) during a short time period, but can be thought about much longer and much more than what might first occur. It’s hard to describe in words, but I think that’s also why I like quotes and poetry. Photo’s, songs, quotes, and poetry are all brief, short, and concise, and I can subsequently take my time processing things long after seeing or reading or hearing. Again, hard to describe in words, but I’ve tried.
Here’s a poem I wrote about pictures:
Pictures
In my mind are pictures of experiences and scenes
They weren’t captured by a device, nor are they dreams
They weren’t made possible by electronics or machines
I guess they simply appeared there by other means
I don’t know how, why, or what may have done the trick
And I don’t think I can consciously decide, choose, or pick
Perhaps it was a certain feeling that made something click
Or maybe it was a specific sight that made the scene stick
These pictures, scenes, and views in my mind’s eye
Occasionally emerge, without me having to try
They tell something, without waiting for a reply
Just for a moment, before saying goodbye
Like a flash of lightning that illuminates the sky
I wonder if these pictures are the lightning in my mind’s eye
Only emerging to then disappear
But just long enough to make something clear
To briefly remind me what I’ve seen
To highlight and show where I’ve been
To momentarily tell me what’s good to know
And to guide and illuminate where I might best go
August 6, 2026 @ 1:50 pm
What a beautiful poem, Alexander. That line about pictures being like a ‘flash of lightning that illuminates the sky’ is so true to how visual memories work. You described that connection between photography, poetry, and song perfectly!
I completely agree—black and white photos are often so much more striking because the lack of color removes what can sometimes be a big distraction, letting you focus purely on the emotion and shadow.
Richard Avedon’s In The American West was actually a massive influence on me when I first started studying photography. In fact, the portfolio I submitted that got me my scholarship was all 4×5 work shot on a seamless white backdrop, very much in that same spirit! https://www.cartermuseum.org/carter-collection/collection-group/american-west
Thank you for your kind words and thoughtful insight!
August 6, 2026 @ 12:06 am
When i first saw those pictures Alexander is talking about they reminded me of this one by Seth Michael Stern:
https://www.instagram.com/p/DChl-6jTktS/?igsh=MWJ2NGt2eDRzZXM4Yw==
August 6, 2026 @ 9:05 am
I haven’t looked at any of the pictures, but this reply chain fulfills the promise of the internet! Bringing people together to talk about something interesting, while ignoring the troll comment (“stalker!”. Well done, y’all!
August 6, 2026 @ 11:14 am
“Bringing people together to talk about something interesting (…)”
Thanks for the comment. I try and “feel” whether it is appropriate to talk about things and share things that may not necessarily be directly related to the topic of the article. I think I’ve seen it before in other comment sections on here and assume it is fine to do, at least once in a while. Your comment helps me in trying to calibrate (if that’s the correct word) my intuition and sense concerning this all, so thanks again.
And as for the “stalker!” comment, I assumed it might very well be intented as a joke. Also, if I remember correctly I think Sofus has been positive about some lyrics I posted a while back. I did not necessarily take the comment as something negative, but to at least make things clear I thought to add the poem-as-a-reply to explain. It also gave me the opportunity to use the hoot ‘n holler thing which I used in the last two days or so in an atttempt to write some lyrics to a blues song intended for a female musician titled “Barred Owl Blues”.
August 5, 2026 @ 1:24 pm
I’ve lived around San Antonio for almost 70 years. The Current has always been a rag, with an extreme left slant. Haven’t read it since I was young and stupid.
August 8, 2026 @ 5:50 am
And now, by the Laws of the New Left, they’s also racist.
August 5, 2026 @ 2:02 pm
As usual I’m not quite sure what point Charley was trying to make, but it was in no way newsworthy.
“Vietnam never ended, we just got used to it,” is a good one though.
August 5, 2026 @ 4:10 pm
His main point was calling out the fake outrage. It’s pretty hypocritical for artists to preach against data centers while using the exact platforms that rely on them to run.
August 5, 2026 @ 4:36 pm
Most of these hyper scale data centers being built are not being built for YouTube videos or Instagram posts or Tweets.
They are being built for AI systems from OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, Anthropic, etc.
The compute power needed to run a bunch of complex prompts to spit out a AI-generated slop video on Facebook is infinite times more than your Uncle Bill posting about the water turning the frogs gay on the same platform.
I really don’t see the hypocrisy around artists railing against data centers. If Brad Paisley or Willie Nelson take a sponsorship deal from Anthropic or start posting AI-generated videos of themselves than I would agree, but saying “hey, maybe putting a noise machine next to a zoo” is a bad idea or “local residents shouldn’t bear the costs and impacts of a hyper scale data center” when the profits will only go to Silicon Valley elites is not hypocritical.
August 6, 2026 @ 5:29 am
Well, Willies team got called out for using an AI generated poster for the 4th of July Picnic just a few months ago.
August 6, 2026 @ 8:38 am
I hardly see some random office worker in Willie’s team using AI to whip up a concert flyer as the same as Willie Nelson being a hypocrite regarding his stance on Data Centers.
The flyer was ugly – most stuff pumped out by AI is – and it shouldn’t have happened, but I hardly see it as evidence that Nelson is a hypocrite on this issue. It’s not like old-man Willie is tapping away in ChatGPT himself “make a poster for my concert”.
If this is the standard we are going to hold the famous to in terms of hypocrisy no individual is ever going to be able to take a stand without being labeled a hypocrite.
I try to avoid AI and Big Tech as much as possible, but I own an iPhone. Does that make me a hypocrite?
Purity tests are stupid.
August 6, 2026 @ 8:46 am
That Willie Nelson poster was likely made by a C3 Presents/LiveNation staffer.
August 6, 2026 @ 2:07 pm
Fair points on the AI compute load versus regular social media, Mike—and the local resource impact is a valid concern. But I think the larger point in all of this is that we’re moving into an age of AI technology that’s becoming completely inescapable. Whether it’s massive server farms built for complex prompts or the apps we use every day, we’re all tied to a system that feels almost impossible to opt out of anymore.
August 6, 2026 @ 11:26 pm
Yeah, I agree, Liza. It’s not anymore a matter of “IF” but it’s a matter of “HOW” and I think that’s what CC was talking about (also when he posted his pictures with Willie and Tanya). He says “real Texans look out for each other”, but you can also read “real human beings look out for each other”
August 7, 2026 @ 11:46 am
Once the bubble pops on the AI industry, we will have a better idea of what that “inescapable” future looks like IMO.
Right now you have a lot of grifters and conmen that are pushing out talking points completely detached from reality about the impact of AI. There are absolutely industries where AI is going to play a massive role even after the bubble pops. See software development, where there is no going back to the old way of writing code with AI tools being quite proficient in at least assisting developers.
But I do think an equilibrium is coming once the hype cycle is done on Wall Street. What exactly that looks like is anyones guess, but based on the public sentiment towards AI and Big Tech in general I think you will see a shift in user habits over time. Some of that might take government regulation – i.e., aggressive anti-trust enforcement towards Google, Meta, etc. – but it is coming.
Parents (and students) are wising up to the fact Chromebooks in the classroom all day are a terrible idea. The Flock camera inferno swirling shows people are wising up the decays of our civil rights and privacy. People overwhelmingly hate data centers and the AI slop infesting their social media feeds.
I don’t like Kara Swisher all that much, but one point I will agree with her on is that it took 30 years for people to turn on Big Tobacco. We are near the 30 year point of a lot of Big Tech companies and you are starting to see public sentiment shift wildly from “I find this new software or piece of tech useful” to “how do I move away from these platforms”.
August 7, 2026 @ 3:09 pm
Not a very well thought out point given he’s against data centres and very active on social media. Very weird a Texas news outlet decided to make a thing out of it but his recent social media presence hasn’t been helping his image and branding. He needs a social media person and to stop posting whatever stream of consciousness comes to mind
August 5, 2026 @ 2:13 pm
Charley sure does love to post on social media with a whole rambling wall of text. Paragraphs? Nah!
August 5, 2026 @ 3:22 pm
None of this could be any dumber if anyone tried. What a stupid and dishonest story. Crazy how quickly the activist machine turned on him. His rant of a reply is a mess in itself. We live in the dumbest timeline as the kids say.
August 5, 2026 @ 3:40 pm
Woke is a cancer!
August 5, 2026 @ 4:25 pm
Please explain to me how any of this relates to “wokeness”.
I’m against the whole “cancel culture” bullshit as much as anyone, but is Charley Crockett “woke” for canceling Twin Temple? Is Charley Crockett “woke” for bringing up a very right-wing talking point of celebrities pitching climate change talking points while cruising around the world in tour buses and private jets?
Is the journalist “woke” for responding to Charley’s comments?
This isn’t “woke”. This is stupidity. Crockett has showed his ass a lot lately – sorry Trigger, but it’s true – and the journalist wrote a lazy, clickbait article. That ain’t “woke”.
August 5, 2026 @ 5:11 pm
Cancel culture is woke.
August 5, 2026 @ 6:30 pm
Huh. So ‘woke’ cancelled Bud Light over that trans lady? And cancelled Kaep over taking a knee? The Dixie Chicks? More than a few GOP politicians who didn’t bend the MAGA knee? People getting fired for saying anything about Charlie Kirk that wasn’t effusive praise? Changing signs in museums and national parks to remove any suggestion that maybe some bad things happened in our past? Banning books from schools? Cancelling education programs that discuss racism, sexism, gender, sexuality, or bias? Ron ‘Woke’ DeSantis’ Don’t Say Gay Bill? The red scare? The lavender scare?
Stop buying into politicians and the media trying to paint villainous portraits of your fellow citizens and consider that cancel culture is a whole lot of bullshit yet also a very human thing, and as irritating as it is, it’s also been around a very long time and has been used in all sorts of ways by all kinds of people.
August 6, 2026 @ 9:13 am
Yeah, I detested MAGA attempting to cancel everyone’s free speech rights after Charlie Kirk was assassinated. Kirk was definitely a hypocritical asshole, deserved to be called out as a hypocritical asshole, but shouldn’t have been assasinated for it. But I totally agree with you that MAGA is totally woke, and went totally woke trying to whitewash Kirk’s life.
This is what you’re referring to, right?
Because while I love both Charley Crockett & Willie Nelson, and probably agree with their politics, I don’t look to Charley Crockett for political advice, much less get offended by it, nor do I look to Willie Nelson for advice on my respiratory health…
August 6, 2026 @ 10:56 am
You know we can hear you, right? How you Leftists have responded to Charlie Kirk’s assassination has been the most radicalizing thing I’ve seen in a long time.
August 5, 2026 @ 4:18 pm
Whiskey Riff just managed to squeeze a 1000 word story out of Evan Felker’s sarcastic reply to a smartass question about the co- headlining gig he’s doing with Charley at Cain’s on the 26th. As a retired music journalist, I would think that Evan and Charley doing a show together at a legendary venue would be the point of the story.
August 5, 2026 @ 5:10 pm
You know the answer. It’s why you immediately thought of cancel culture.
August 5, 2026 @ 7:21 pm
Actually I didn’t think of “woke culture” at all. Just that they buried the lede.
August 5, 2026 @ 4:42 pm
Yes, the San Antonio Current article was a ridiculous take on what Charlie Crockett posted, and he’d be justified in calling the writer a pathetic idiot.
“But articles like the one in San Antonio Current undermine the credibility of all media outlets.”
No they don’t. This one undermindes the credibility of the woke hack who wrote it.
“Defaming and libelous”?
Sheesh.
Everybody has opinions, some smart and some dumb.
Why would a guy who has his own highly opinionated, blog/site (or whatever this is classified as) want to expand the parameters of defamation to encompass sloppily sourced opinions? Do you want to make it easier for some artist or personality to sue you for something you wrote?
A couple of the threshold issues for bringing a libel suit are that you have to prove that the statements were false and that you suffered damages. It’s likely that some jurors would say the article was false, some would say it’s true and most would probably just be confused by it. And good luck trying to prove that Charlie Crockett was damage by this nonsense
August 5, 2026 @ 5:18 pm
Wow! Right away talking about taking people to court. The article was defaming and libel. Doesn’t mean anyone is taking the writer to court or suing them. Lol
August 5, 2026 @ 7:21 pm
When you go off on how terrible an irresponsible and article is and then add that it’s “arguably defaming and libelous,” you’re suggesting that the subject should sue. If not, then what’s the point of adding that? Fine. It’s irresponsible, its defaming, it’s libelous, it’s an atrocity it’s horrific–you can go on if you don’t actually mean anything new with the additional invective.
August 6, 2026 @ 8:57 am
The term “arguably” is what you’re missing here Luckyoldsun. I do think it’s defamatory. And I’ll say this: the editor has now come out on record saying to “My San Antonio” that they’re not going to correct the story, nor are they going to update it with any of Charley Crockett’s rebuttal.
https://www.mysanantonio.com/entertainment/article/charley-crockett-san-antonio-22373678.php
Even TMZ would reach out to an artist to attempt to get comment, or update with their statement in a situation like this. Yes, slander and libel are very hard to prove in a court of law. But I think if he did, San Antonio Current’s refusal to even consider his side would certainly be a mark against them.
They’ve set a very bad, lazy precedent.
August 6, 2026 @ 5:40 am
It’s quite concerning that a journalist could read that and take from it Charley is pro data center.
August 6, 2026 @ 6:34 am
…on a little side note: at his zurich concert at the end of june brad paisley played around with some of the audience’s mobiles. quite surprised he found out that many swiss didn’t have all the popular social media icons on their phones leading him to ask: “you have instagram here, don’t you?” that much for being newly critical about data centers. by the way, shopping malls have a much larger ecological footprint than data centers – and there are way more of them in the u.s., i believe.
charley crockett’s strategy is working: he knows very well that he cannot win them all (music fans) but he can attempt to build a solid and big enough base of dedicated followers by regularly closing the ranks against haters. kinda smart move and keeping him steadily in the public eye. ms. koithan was less smart making herself a nice tool – and that world famous “san antonio chronicle”. still, not such useful ones as charley’s favourite fool: mr. adcock.
August 7, 2026 @ 1:53 am
Adcock is everyone’s favorite fool because he’s an entitled jerk. To hate on him you take a number and get in line.
August 6, 2026 @ 6:58 am
Who would really be interested in whether Crockett or any other celebrity is for or against Data Centers? I might like an artist’s music but I do not always agree with their views or opinions. This article is fairly typical clickbait nonsense.
August 6, 2026 @ 8:49 am
I think people are extremely interested in where people stand on data centers, and it’s an 80/20 issue where if you stand on the wrong side, you’re likely to be publicly shamed. That is why I think this particular story is so egregious and potential defamatory in how it was presented.
August 6, 2026 @ 9:29 am
https://www.instagram.com/p/Dbs9smnjgXq/?igsh=Z3Q1N3IydTFsNDVm
August 6, 2026 @ 10:40 am
Look at me I’m on your side!!! I’m a good guy!!
Marissa needs to start up her accountability list again. We absolutely need to know where every artist stands on Palestine, data centers, fracking, dumb “devil worshipping” bands, Super Bowl half time shows, ice, etc etc, etc….
And we need more of these posts. Every artist needs to prove their purity NOW, by posting via their friendly data center!!
August 6, 2026 @ 2:41 pm
Where does Charley stand on censorship?
We know Trigger is big into it.
August 6, 2026 @ 3:13 pm
We know Big Jilm is big into shitposting.
Go and try to leave a comment about censorship on Whiskey Riff or Rolling Stone, or a comment at all.
Best of luck.
August 6, 2026 @ 3:25 pm
What is shitpoasting about wondering if Charley uses AI to write his lyrics?
August 7, 2026 @ 7:27 am
If Charley Crockett used AI, his songs would be better written. Just like your assertion that he’s a “rich kid,” it’s bullshit. It’s shitposting, and disruptive to actual adult conversation.
August 6, 2026 @ 5:13 pm
Charley just posted an anti AI song on his Facebook and IG and it’s hilarious. Jesse Welles will be jealous.
August 7, 2026 @ 12:20 pm
More proof he can’t carry a tune.
August 6, 2026 @ 5:15 pm
Censorship is the government telling you what you can’t say. Private party’s have every right to tell you to go crap someplace else.
August 8, 2026 @ 7:11 am
I’m calling this web site Saving Linda Cauthen from now on.
August 7, 2026 @ 4:47 am
This whole ongoing thing is flat-out exhausting.
August 10, 2026 @ 3:43 pm
I’m sure Charley and Willie have done a deep dive into all things data center. Poring over studies and economic analyses deep into the night. Give me a break. Who the fuck cares what any musician thinks about anything other than music?
August 21, 2026 @ 12:07 pm
You hit him once and he acts like he got hit ten times. That’s Charley for you.