Slackeye Slim Latest to Pull Music Amid False Streaming Fraud Notices

Songwriter and musician Joe Frankland, better known by his artist name Slackeye Slim, has been a creative force in underground country for over 15 years. His conceptualized Western album El Santo Grial, La Pistola Piadosa won Saving Country Music’s 2011 Album of the Year, and his 2023 album Scorched Earth, Black Heart was also well-received.
But unfortunately, you can no longer navigate to your favorite DSP of choice (Spotify, Apple Music, etc.) and spin any of Slackeye Slim’s titles, thanks to yet another pernicious and pervasive issue plaguing the digital music space in the technological dystopia that continues to entrench itself.
As fraud runs rampant on these music distribution networks, companies take punitive actions to attempt to curb it that ultimately affect innocent artists negatively, and nowhere is a human reachable to solve these problems. The whole livelihoods of some artists are simply written off as collateral damage in the algorithmic/AI approach to policing fraud, while ironically, much of the fraud continues unabated.
In late May, Slackeye Slim received a notice from his music distributor TuneCore warning him that his music had been flagged for illegal streaming activity. Clearly, performers paying for artificial streams is a real issue, and something worthy of addressing. But an underground country artist who only pursues music part-time would not be one of these guilty parties.
The warning also said, “In line with our and our store partners’ policies, if we continue to receive reports that the content noted above is generating artificial streams, TuneCore will process full, all-store takedowns, and you will be subject to a financial penalty of €10 per track per month where artificial streams account for almost all of the track’s total streams.”
Slackeye Slim had been working with TuneCore since 2008, and was a premium subscriber to the service. Nonetheless, he was unable to receive a response from support about the matter. “I wrote and reminded them that I had been a customer for many years and let them know I was not happy. I had not received a response, so I pulled all of my music offline to avoid being penalized. Many other musicians have simply had their music removed without warning.”
He also reached out to Spotify, who told him to consult his distributor (TuneCore). Slackeye was able to determine through Spotify that on February 16th and 17th, a song received 1,800 plays that normally would have only received a dozen. These weren’t plays that Slackeye Slim had anything to do with, and as soon as fake plays are detected, they are immediately deleted, so he hadn’t received credit for them in any way. They also happened four months before he was notified about them.
“My story is repeated over and over again in YouTube videos, Reddit posts, etc.” says Slackeye Slim. “Essentially, these distributors are punishing their customers for something they have nothing to do with, all while refusing to help resolve it. As far as I can tell, no one is doing anything about it. They are not being held accountable. It seems that they are viewing these fines as additional revenue. It’s highway robbery.”
Slackeye Slim is definitely not alone. An artist named Benn Jordan with 1.6 million annual listeners had 23 albums removed from DSPs for alleged streaming fraud in 2024. Benn Jordan was also a TuneCore customer, though according to many, DistroKid can be even worse in these matters.
As Benn Jordan said, “Whether this is malice related to my Spotify criticism or simply negligence, this is dystopian for reasons much larger than myself or my loss of income … being erased from existence and gaslit is among one of the worst things that can happen to an artist.”
After pulling his music, Slackeye Slim tried to re-upload his music through a different distributor, but one of the DSPs continued to put up roadblocks.
“I was informed that I had to change the artwork for ‘Santo Grial’ because the AI these DSPs use can’t differentiate between text in the artwork and the text for the artist/title. So I paid someone to remove the text in the artwork of a 14 year old album. Next, I got a notification saying I couldn’t publish ‘Scorched Earth – Black Heart’ unless I replace the dash with a comma and also change the artwork to reflect that. They are now dictating what we can call our albums.
“It’s way out of control. I just made the decision to not redistribute to DSPs. It’s gonna hurt, yeah, but I’m not going to bow down to some billionaire (Daniel Ek) and his AI who already treats music made by real people like a valueless commodity.”
That means Slackeye Slim’s music will not be returning to streaming services anytime soon.
“I don’t make a lot of money from music, but it’s enough to set aside to pay for releasing new music,” he says. “I can’t imagine the burden this would put on an independent musician who is actually trying to use their music to pay the bills.”
Many full-time musicians are also facing this dilemma as the DSPs continue to lean more and more into AI and bots to police the online music marketplace, and refuse to give musicians the option to speak to a human who could often solve the issue in minutes.
You can still purchase Slackeye Slim’s music directly at slackeyeslim.com/shop.
– – – – – – – –
If you found this article valuable, consider leaving Saving Country Music A TIP.
June 11, 2025 @ 7:28 am
Dystopian is exactly what the AI universe is in so many ways. And it gets worse by the day.
June 11, 2025 @ 7:47 am
That’s infuriating, and sure this artist is a small fry, but the whole business model is you pay a monthly fee for LITERALLY ALL THE MUSIC EVER. I think the model is more fragile than it appears on the surface. It’s not impossible that a competitor could come along that fragments the whole thing.
June 11, 2025 @ 9:42 am
Well that’s bullshit. Sorry to hear this stuff is effecting him and others financially. I saw recently that he was going to release some cover songs. I’m excited to check out his 16 Horsepower cover since his voice is pretty much the opposite of David Eugene Edward’s. I wonder if this affects the release of those cover songs.
June 11, 2025 @ 12:22 pm
Everybody reading this site should drop everything and read Liz Pelly’s book about Spotify, Mood Machine. It’s a phenomenal look about what spotify’s business model actually is, and how much it fucks over absolutely everybody involved except the executives at the company.
Benn Jordan, an electronic musician and YouTuber mentioned in this article, has done very good documentaries and videos about all of the issues involved with streaming, AI music and fraud, and a lot of other relevant stuff. He’s all over the place and covers all kinds of techie topics as well but he’s one of the people doing the best work on these problems.
You can stream Slackeye Slim’s albums on Bandcamp too. At least for now, until band camp gets enshittified too.
June 11, 2025 @ 12:27 pm
And I know the issue here is allegedly mostly about the distributors, but that is how Spotify polices streaming fraud, often incorrectly. The distributor is, sort of an arbitrary middleman parasite between artists and streaming platforms. Spotify forces the distributors to deal with fraud allegations by finding them I believe, and the distributors pass the punishment on to artists.
Another outlet that deals with the ins and outs of this kind of thing is the YouTube channel Top Music Attorney, who often those videos looking at streaming service and distributor terms of service and contracts
June 11, 2025 @ 5:01 pm
I personally like the fact that the new Turnpike record was released on SoundCloud. Advertisements before/after each track. I’m assuming in that model it’s similar to local radio. The advertising pays for operational costs and the royalties. Win…win.
June 11, 2025 @ 5:54 pm
Why TF are distributors even a thing in the streaming era? It should be completely trivial to just upload a file to and get paid. I don’t know if that would solve this particular issue, but it’s just nonsense that there’s this middleman gatekeeper for an online platform.
June 11, 2025 @ 9:59 pm
The streaming services invented the need for distributors- that won’t deal with artists directly. So you get this additional annoying parasite that you have to pay for completely arbitrary reasons. There’s no reason it had to be that way except that the streaming service is decided it had to be that way.
June 12, 2025 @ 1:47 am
I wondered why all my Slackeye Slim was gone from my Weird Western playlist. So sad, one of my favorite artists. I still have the songs locally on my PC/phone so I can add them that way but I was happier to have them on my large, active Americana playlist so others could discover this music. I miss the early 2010’s when indie artists had an easier time getting their music out on various sites. Now it seems we’re rolling right back to corporate gatekeeping. My discovery weekly has been full of absolute corporate trash lately too.
June 12, 2025 @ 2:14 am
Stop streaming music. It’s 2025 and legal downloading has never been easier/better + physical media is still available. There is no reason to bog around in the streaming swamp anymore.
June 12, 2025 @ 6:15 am
Unfortunately, not everything gets either a CD or digital download release. (A case in point is the recent Bob Woodruff release which I mentioned in a comment on the ‘Best of 2025 so far’ article: it is only available on vinyl, or through the various streaming platforms.)
June 12, 2025 @ 9:41 am
All the real money to made in music, is in fucking over musicians.
June 14, 2025 @ 5:53 pm
I’m so glad I found this article because I’m going through this right now.
June 13, 2025 @ 2:58 pm
PSA– not sure if related to the spotify kerfuffle, but two CDs of his are currently available on his website for $4 apiece. If you want to keep listening to his stuff/send a message of support/middle finger to spotify, might be worth an investment.
June 14, 2025 @ 2:13 pm
I wasn’t aware of this unfortunate trend. It should be a mere temporary annoyance that can be resolved by professing your innocence to someone at your distributor, but it seems that’s not necessarily the case.
It’s perhaps also worth noting that the fees these distributors charge to upload an artist’s release are often considerably more money than many independent artists will ever make back in streaming revenue. Additionally, distributors are increasingly and forcibly moving to annual, rather than release-based, fee structures, which means that to keep your releases available on DSPs, you have to pay a hosting fee every year, not just as a once off.