Album Review – Charley Crockett’s “Lonesome Drifter”

It wasn’t a hit single or record that landed Charley Crockett where he is today, and it most certainly didn’t happen overnight. His strategy more closely resembles something certain people in the industry would probably label as sheer stupidity. But it’s a strategy that has now revealed itself to be sweat equity and dogged persistence that brick by brick has built one of the most momentous and fortified music careers out there to study. It started on street corners, and might end up in arenas before he’s done.
Charley Crockett isn’t the greatest singer out there, and his songwriting is simple and plainspoken. As he says in his new song “Life of a Country Singer,” “I ain’t the first one, or the best, but I’m different.” That difference is Crockett’s ability to get you to completely suspend disbelief and fully immerse yourself into his musical universe while he weaves seamlessly through the roots music disciplines of country, blues, soul, and early rock ‘n’ roll without you ever recognizing the difference.
For his latest album Lonesome Drifter, Charley Crockett solicits the services of Shooter Jennings as producer, where previously throwback genius Billy Horton had been employed for many of Crockett’s records. No concerns about pulling Charley towards rock present themselves as sometimes Shooter projects do. Instead, the notable difference is the presence of strings on numerous tracks, which helps lend to the cinematic experience of listening to a Charley Crockett record.
There’s always been a very visual component to Crockett’s audio experience. Lonesome Drifter is sold as the first installment of an album trilogy with a deeper story. Crockett loves to speak in wide and sweeping notions, which lends to that cinematic immersion. Weather we get three albums with a deeper narrative remains to be seen, but he certainly gets you buttered up for it with Act One.
Many of the new, original songs of Lonesome Drifter seem to be inspired by Charley’s own experiences, while perhaps embellished with fiction. “Game I Can’t Win” is about his philosophy of dealing with the music industry, which he’s always been wary of, and found his success in spite of. In “Easy Money,” he talks at one point about his brother going to prison and Charley ending up in New York, which loosely shadows Crockett’s own experience.

“Never No More” feels inspired by his wife and fellow performer Taylor Grace, who Crockett married at Willie Nelson’s little Luck, TX Western town outside of Austin. An interesting note about the song: it sounds like Crockett played his own guitar solo on the track in his more aspirational than adept, but still entertaining plucking style.
The night before the release of Lonesome Drifter, Crockett played an intimate acoustic set in Willie’s legendary chapel in Luck as part of the Luck Reunion. He said his new song “Life of a Country Singer” was partly inspired by Willie, along with his own story of course, with the reference to “Houston” calling to mind Willie writing “Family Bible” while living in the city, and having to sell the song for $50 to buy his family bread.
Lonesome Drifter gives you another good haul of original Charley Crockett songs that are immediately entertaining, and that endear you ever further to the man and the mythos, even if he writing is never groundbreaking. You also can’t wait to hear some of these songs live.
You also get another fine selection of cover songs. Some will ask why we need another version of “Jamestown Ferry,” which Crockett first helped blow up way back in 2017, or “Amarillo By Morning” by George Strait. But one of Crockett’s biggest bullet points has been his ability to revitalize classic country songs. “These kids don’t know this f—king song,” he recently said about “Amarillo By Morning,” and unfortunately he’s right. Being an interpreter of songs across time and generations is a critical attribute to Crockett’s career and legacy.
But what ultimately has made Charley Crockett a wonder of music and an unlikely story is the magic and charisma he exudes that has made a poor kid from south Texas who started as a street busker seem larger than life. He was a Lonesome Drifter for many years as he tried to find himself and the world tried to find him. Now, he’s Charley Crockett.
1 3/4 Guns Up (8/10)
– – – – – – – – – –
Purchase from Charley Crockett
Purchase from Amazon
March 14, 2025 @ 8:42 am
He’s no Shaboozy but the man can sing!
March 14, 2025 @ 8:47 am
Why the recording sound like he’s far away from the mic? Another banger Chuck!
March 19, 2025 @ 1:13 pm
I had the same thought when I first listened on streaming. I think it’s the Atmos mix that sucks. Listen to the CD in normal stereo sounds way better.
March 14, 2025 @ 8:55 am
Love his music! It’s a great album. Gonna see him on Monday at the Houston Rodeo!!!!
March 14, 2025 @ 9:17 am
Look I don’t want to be too off topic but do the kids really not know Amarillo by morning? I’m 36 but maybe I’m old now lol
March 18, 2025 @ 1:05 am
Haha! Man, the sad thing at our age we are. That’s considered classic country my friend.
March 14, 2025 @ 9:18 am
Charley has one of the highest floors in country music, when there’s a new Charley Crockett record you know its going to be good at minimum. There’s a reason he’s been in the top 3 of my spotify the last few years, and will be again this year, you can just hit play on his whole catalogue and let it roll all evening long. Its the soundtrack to many a card night in my house.
The record sounds great, I love the strings, I love the organic sound. Crank it up loud and you feel you are in a concert hall with him and a full band and strings, whatever they are doing at Sunset Sounds I hope they continue. There are some cracking tracks, I can’t tell you how many times I’ve danced with my daughter in the kitchen to Game I Can’t Win the last few weeks and 3 or 4 of them will still be in his setlist for years to come.
With that said on his scale I feel this record is middle of the pack, and unlikely to be in my top 10 records of the year. I think the record goes into a bit of a lull in the middle where the tracks are pleasant, but lack a little something to stand out.
Overall I’d say 7/10.
March 14, 2025 @ 9:28 am
exactly how i felt. also been dancing in the kitchen with daughters to charley for years.
March 14, 2025 @ 9:22 am
Gotta say this is his weakest album in quite a few. Coming from a huge CC fan. Sounded a bit dull and suffered from same-ness. The Orbison strings didn’t do much to help what was otherwise a gloss over album to me. It just doesn’t have those sweeping melodic Charley songs that pull you in i.e. Diamond in the Rough, Odessa, Charlene. Doesn’t change anything about Charley for me and I had heard (correct me if I’m wrong) he recorded the $10 albums after this one so he certainly hasn’t lost his sound.
March 15, 2025 @ 4:32 pm
And yet, a bad Charley Crockett album is 100 percent better than 98 percent of country radio. Agree that it’s not as good as previous albums but still enjoyable out on my exercise walks.
March 14, 2025 @ 9:44 am
Those that know my comments , realize I’ve been a staunch defender of Crockett. And that’s unchanged. Yet as the years go by, my mind has come around to the solid conclusion that this guy is a CHARACTER.
He’s been rocking this persona for awhile now. And he’s not morphing into anything else, he’s tripling down on the act as it were.
Charley Crockett is a carefully crafted stage character. And he’s very good at it. You attend a live performance, and you can’t look away, he sucks you in with the whole deal. The quality of the band, the style, the songs, and the performance. He’s developed the whole thing into an art form.
That’s how I see him now. Thats not a bad thing either. It’s all entertainment. But who is the real Charley Crockett? I wonder if he even knows. Is he the Tom Waits of throwback country? I’m mulling that idea over, and I may be off base with that analogy, but think about how Tom Waits is an over- the- top character in every way, and yet brilliant as an entertainer. Again, you cant look away, it just grabs you. Feel free to tell me I’m way out there on this take.
Sounds like a decent record and is it just me or is Crockett putting out 2-3 albums a year now? That’s crazy.
March 14, 2025 @ 10:40 am
That’s an interesting comparison to Tom Waits.
March 14, 2025 @ 11:57 am
Not a bad analogy. After all, Tom Waits covered “Phantom 309”, but he did it his way instead of trying to copy Red Sovine . Charley would try to sound closer to Red.
March 15, 2025 @ 3:14 pm
Never understood this perspective on authentic versus contrived character. Everyone, everyday, chooses how they want to be perceived and adjusts their behavior accordingly. Tom Waits was Tom Waits because he did what Tom Waits wanted to do and acted in a manner that matched what he had in his head. So what’s more real: a personality someone wants to change and has never felt suited them, or one that they’ve explicitly chosen?
March 15, 2025 @ 4:38 pm
Kevin, I agree with you but I’d say the vast majority of popular musicians (not classical musicians) create a persona, whether it’s a gangster rapper who grew up in the suburbs or Johnny Cash, who didn’t really shoot a man in Reno.
True story: many decades ago I met a well-known blues musician, nearing the end of his own lifelong career singing about broken homes, drinking, bad women, gambling, men gone wrong, prison, etc, etc. He was so proud to show me a family picture of his wife of 50 years and their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren, all of whom like him were active in his church (he was a deacon for decades.) The entirety of his blues-hard-living schtick was a persona, when in fact he was a steadily employed Christian teetotaler!
His clean living didn’t hurt his music at all.
March 18, 2025 @ 1:10 am
The difference is Charley knows music. The history, the songs, he lives, eats and breathes all of it. So being such a historian of country music he is living out his passion. I think that’s a hell of a lot more authentic than you are giving him credit for. Nashville didn’t create him, he created himself. Then to top it off the dude straight up earned it.
March 14, 2025 @ 10:09 am
Haven’t heard the rest of the album yet, but I do have to say I liked the 2017 version of ”Jamestown Ferry” a lot better.
March 14, 2025 @ 10:44 am
One thing is for certain the dude is all about wakin’ up and bustin’ his but tryin’ to earn a wittle where she pay. He’s country to the bone.
March 14, 2025 @ 11:03 am
This album is not grabbing me like his previous ones. His voice needs to be front and center, why are the instruments up front and not his voice?!
“These kids don’t know this f—king song,” he recently said about “Amarillo By Morning,” and unfortunately he’s right.
Citation needed lol because according to my Spotify app, “Amarillo By Morning” is the #1 George Strait song, with 275 million streams. The kids know George, they don’t know Garth since he’s the dumb dumb deciding to only let Amazon music and Bass Pro Shops hold his music.
Covering Amarillo is puzzling to me. It’s too well known. When he covered Jerry Reed, he went with a deep cut. Willie Nelson, his pre-outlaw clean cut days. I will admit I did not know Jamestown Ferry when he first covered it, so it was like a new song to me. I love that whole album of James Hand songs he did.
March 15, 2025 @ 4:42 pm
Julie, agree 100 percent, this was an unnecessary cover, because “Amarillo” is so deeply associated with George Straight that any similar cover is likely to suffer in comparison.
I’d compare this to Luke Combs covering “Fast Car.” That’s totally different: a white good ol’ boy singing “Fast Car,” even if he basically just copied the original, revealed the universality of the song, because nobody could claim it’s about being black or being a woman or being poor (which Tracy Chapman wasn’t.) By singing in a woman’s voice, Combs make that song something new, and made it an act of great empathy with anybody stuck in generational dysfunction.
Crockett singing “Amarillo” didn’t do anything new. That’s the problem, to me.
March 14, 2025 @ 11:17 am
“Amarillo By Morning” is not unknown to today’s listeners.
It has 43 million views in 11 years.
March 14, 2025 @ 3:08 pm
And it still gets played in the “gold” rotation at some mainstream country stations, although you’re probably more likely to hear “Check Yes or No” or “Write This Down” or the embarrassing “River of Love,” which are more contemporary sounding and ditty-like than meatier tracks like “Amarillo.”
March 18, 2025 @ 8:51 am
YouTube views and radio play are not really a way to gauge the appeal of young listeners. If the younger generation knows a George Strait song the best, it’s “Carrying Your Love With Me,” because it’s been part of a viral Tik-Tok sensation.
Anyway, I’ve been keeping quiet about this, but as i suspected, Charley Crockett performed “Amarillo By Morning” as the encore to his performance at Rodeo Houston last night to probably over 60,000 people. I think his Rodeo Houston berth is the reason he wanted to cover that song. And that’s not a bad reason.
March 19, 2025 @ 8:12 am
It’s Texas and Charley is Texas. Nuff said.
March 14, 2025 @ 12:49 pm
Well ive listened to it a couple times now, i still need a few more to fully appreciate it but ill still give my thoughts here. Being a shooter jennings produced album, you might think this would be one of crocketts more uptempo albums but its the opposite actually. The middle is very mellow, too mellow for me. While i loved his original jamestown ferry, i figured i would love this more with the horns but he underused them, more just a token showing so i like it less. Amirillo by morning is a fine cover, i think a more obscure strait song would have been better. I totally love two songs, game i cant win, and night rider. Under neon lights isnt bad and life of a country singer while slow and mellow is the most tolerable of the slower songs in the middle. To me its a step back from his last album, visions of dallas which to me was perfect, not one bad song on it. While i dont usually rate albums, this is closer to a 7 than a 8. I could see where some might like the style of a lot of the tracks and would rate it higher but not me. He said hes got 28 more tracks already lined up for next album so hopefully he opens it up a bit more there.
March 14, 2025 @ 2:04 pm
“Lonesome Drifter” fulfills the expectations one has of a Charlie Crockett album. But it doesn’t exceed them.
“$10 Cowboy” was an exciting, thrilling masterpiece, one of the best albums of 2024.
“Lonesome Drifter,” on the other hand, is somewhat disappointing. The songs are arranged somewhat similarly. The mood of the songs is also quite similar and less varied than on “$10 Cowboy.”
If I had to explain the difference between neo-traditional and retro to someone, I would play these two albums. “$10 Cowboy” as an example of neo-traditional and “Lonesome Drifter” as an example of retro.
It’s a very good album, but less strong than his work from the previous year.
The individual songs are strong, but as a whole they are not varied enough to maintain the excitement throughout the entire album.
March 14, 2025 @ 4:01 pm
I’m gonna point out that Amarillo by Morning is actually by Terry Stafford. Hell, even Ned Ledoux covered it before George Straight did. (And better, if you ask me)
I quite like Charlie’s version. Just as I like Moe Bandy’s. It’s really a hard song to screw up.
March 14, 2025 @ 5:01 pm
Chris Ledoux* but you’re right. LeDoux’s version will always be my favorite. Massively underrated.
March 14, 2025 @ 7:10 pm
I meant Chris. Brain fart on my part. It’s been a long day. But yeah, his version just feels more authentic. George’s is great, but it sounds more…commercial. Chris lived the rodeo life, George didn’t.
March 18, 2025 @ 1:13 am
The fact that you know who Ned Ledoux is, gives you all the credibility sir.
March 18, 2025 @ 1:59 pm
Not a sir, but the respect is appreciated!
I really do think Ned is doing his father proud. He’s put out some great western music.
March 15, 2025 @ 12:54 am
He is authentic. The real deal.
March 15, 2025 @ 6:31 am
I’ll be honest, I haven’t been the biggest Charlie Crockett fan. I don’t dislike the guy, and a few songs have passed through my playlists the last few years, but the whole retro sound thing just kinda comes off as a schtick. It’s more like trying to recreate a 40s/50s country sound rather than having influences help create your own sound.
As the comments above show, Crockett’s fans like this sound, and there is almost a sub genre now of artists now who make this kind of music. But I think the switch to Shooter Jennings as producer has brought out a growth in Crockett. Instead of feeling like you have accidentally stumbled onto some old album from the past, this album sounds like a modern country album that respects past influences.
I’m sure there will be disagreement on my take from Crockett’s current fans, but I think this album is a definite improvement in his direction going forward, and will appeal to a wider audience than just a sub genre of retro artists.
March 15, 2025 @ 8:51 am
I think thats a good observation. There are songs on here that i think if charley had did them by himself instead of using shooter, they would sound quite differently. This was something i began thinking about when contemplating my dislike for some of the stuff. The songs seem fine, its more the production. Far as your comments, it being a schtick, i agree with you but i dont think its a bad thing. Lots of artists do it, in fact most to a point. Thing is most are trying to emulate the 90s sound or in some cases the western sound, charley delves back a lot further and more varied. With the 90s stuff, i just think might as well just listen to alan jackson who does it best. Charleys stuff is old enough that goes past my memory n experience a bit. Now it will be interesting if charley is trying to do as u say. Im not sure charley has the vocals to pull it off to be successful, but we will see. Is he going to be able to gain more fans than he might lose with a big change. One album wont lose long time fans but a total shift might. Like i said, to me its an ok album. Its not up to 10 dollar cowboy and especially visions of dallas but we will see what his next album brings.
March 15, 2025 @ 9:35 am
I agree. Most music these days is derivative from the past, and that’s ok because it’s those familiar sounds that draw us to the artists we love. I just feel some artists seem to imitate the past rather than try to take those influences and create something their own. And I’m not trying to single out Crockett. He’s probably just the most successful in this particular type of sound.
As you say, it will remain to be seen if broadening his sound will attract new listeners, or simply alienate his loyal following. For me, I can say this is the first Charlie Crockett album I listened all the way through without skipping several songs and just grabbing the one or two I like for a playlist.
March 17, 2025 @ 8:36 am
I think sometimes this take is right, and it definitely has that old timey (more 60s/70s than 40s/50s) country feel on this record, but I think his whole catallogue is deeper than that where he blends country, soul, blues, rock and New Orleons jazz influence into a sound that I think he can call his own.
For me he did think best on Man from Waco where songs like “I’m Just a Clown” capture that blend perfectly. I think if there is one criticism of him its that he goes for quantity over quality. There are some tracks on this record that feel a little unfinished/album filler. Over the last 3 records I think there are 2 great albums. I know he prides himself of publishing a lot like Willie Nelson, butd a little more editing would serve his albums better.
March 15, 2025 @ 3:08 pm
I’d like to know what the man himself, Charlie thinks about his new cut?
March 17, 2025 @ 12:11 pm
I think the assessment that its a step down from the last two records is probably fair but it could grow on me. I still like his work ethic though.